Women’s health across
time and space
6th
Australian Women’s Health Conference
Hobart, Australia
Lorraine Greaves, PhD, DU
British Columbia Centre of Excellence for
Women’s Health
Canada
Goals
1. To reflect on progress in women’s health over
the past 50 years
2. To identify conceptual developments in
women’s health
3. To promote understanding of policy making
4. To recommend strategies going forward to
improve women’s health policy and practice
Keeping in mind four“locations”
 Providers
 Academic researchers
 Policy makers
 Communities
Messages
 There has been progress, lots of it
 Conceptual approaches are in constant
evolution
 Evidence, engagement and economics
matter in policy making
 We need to be more strategic to secure
our achievements
Part 1
Progress
2nd
wave women’s movement
 Emerging politics of
women’s liberation
 Consciousness-
raising
 Control over body
 Labour force
participation and
pay equity
Including decades of women’s health
advocacy
 Over-medicalization of women
 Sexism & paternalism
 Gender-neutrality and gender-blindness
 Exclusion from trials
 Lack of women in science and medicine
Feminist Women's Health Center, Oregon
Self-examination kits to avoid
doctors and be self sufficient
Home birth and midwifery- avoiding
hospital and reclaiming birthing
Women’s health movement
identified values to underpin care
 Inclusive
 Sensitive
 Respectful
 Empowering
 Accessible
 Comprehensive
Since 1970 in Canada
 Royal Commission on the Status of Women
1970
 Women’s Health Bureau, 1993
 Centres of Excellence for Women’s Health
Program, 1996
 Women’s Health Strategy, 1999
 Gender analysis policy, 2000
 Institute of Gender and Health, 2000
Some achievements in this time
periodStructural changes
 Rapidly increasing evidence and research on sex,
gender and health
 Introduction of gender analysis into policy
 Creation of women-specific health care services
Parallel processes
 Infiltration of feminists into positions of influence
 Evolution of consciousness raising into communities
of practice and knowledge exchange
 Global advocacy connecting women’s status to
women’s health
Key policies were, and are, very
important
 Institute of Medicine report (USA)
 Argues importance of sex (and gender) in all pillars of
health research “Every cell is sexed” (2001)
 Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
Institute of Gender and Health (2000)
 Requires sex and gender analysis be included in all
proposals
 Health Canada, requires GBA of policies (audited by the
Auditor General of Canada, 2009)
 National Institutes of Health (USA)
 NIH requires women, children and minorities be included in
all research (1993)
 Audited by the General Accounting Office 1999
Led to new knowledge
 Newly identified disease trajectories for
women
 Identification of diagnostic issues
 Requirement for new treatment
approaches
 Shortcomings of rehabilitation identified
 Health system design is gendered
 Health reform is gendered
Part 2
Some theoretical and conceptual
transitions
The concepts, the issues
 Sex
 Gender
 Diversity
 Language clarity
 Measurement issues
 Capacity
 (Re) training
 Institutionalization
 Knowledge transfer
Sedimentary layers of terminology
and analytic frames over30 years
 Sex
 Gender
 Sex and gender
 Sex differences
 Gender differences
 Sex differences and gender
influences
 Sex and gender related
factors
 Gender equity
 Sex stratification
 Sex differentiation
 Gender (based) analysis
 Determinants of health
 Sex and gender (based)
analysis
 Sex, gender and diversity
(based) analysis
 Disparities, inequities of
health
 Intersectional analysis
 Intersectional-type analyses
Parameters of the field have
evolved Health
 Women’s health
 Gender and health
 Men’s health
 Gender and women’s health
 Gender and health, (including
women’s health and men’s health)
 Health equity
 Now three fields: (at least)
 gender and health
 women’s health
 men’s health
Lessons?
 Keep women in sight
 Being vigilant about diluting the focus on
women
 Broadening the field can generate
support
 Continuous adult education is necessary
 Retain the historical values base
 Embrace increasing complexity of
conceptual development
Sex and genderinteract
 Sex: biological and physiologically related
factors
 Metabolism, hormones, size, anatomy etc
 Gender: social and cultural factors
 Roles
 Identity
 Relations
 Institutionalized gender
Osteoarthritis &
Osteoporosis
Sex: Female bodies are more likely to
develop osteoarthritis or osteoporosis due
to differences in bone structure, bone
density, and hormones (Cenci et al., 2000;
Riggs, 2000).
Gender: Feminine gender roles do not
encourage women to do weight-bearing
exercises, which put women at risk for
developing osteoarthritis and osteoporosis
(Fausto-Sterling, 2005).
Cardiovasculardisease
Sex: Aspirin helps prevent cardiovascular disease
in men but not women due to genetics and
hormones (Levin, 2005). Women may have different
symptoms than men of CVD.
Gender: Women may delay seeking care for
cardiovascular health problems due to cultural
expectations or their multiple roles within families,
which may prevent them from taking time for
themselves (Rosenfeld, Lindauer, and Darney, 2005)
CardiovascularDisease (CVD)
and Diversity
 Substantial ethnic differences in CVD exist;
The death rate due to CVD is 69% higher in
black women than white in the USA
(American Heart Association, 1997).
 Gender and class-linked differences
associated with CVD risk factors include:
smoking, hypertension, poor nutrition,
diabetes, obesity (American Heart
Association, 1997), access to health care
and educational attainment (Nietert,
Sutherland, Keil, & Bachman, 2006).
Contracting HIV – sex and gender
collide
Sex: The vagina is more susceptible to
contracting sexually transmitted infections
(STIs) than the penis due to physiology
(Darroch and Frost, 1999)
Gender: Women can have less power in
sexual relationships which puts them at a
greater risk of contracting HIV (Amaro and
Raj, 2000). And, women may delay
seeking treatment for HIV/AIDS due to
family and childcare obligations.
Ourlocations have evolved as well…
 Community
 Women and girls
 Community
organizations
 Advocates
 Activists
 Providers
 Health care providers
 Social services
 Hospitals
 Health authorities
 Researchers
 Academics
 Community based
researchers
 Polling firms
 Policy makers
 Government
 Decision makers
 Institutional leaders
 Research funding
agencies
In reality, many linkages between
sectors
Community
Research
Policy
Care
In reality, common goals and
movement
 These sectors are overlapping sets
 Less distinguishable now compared to 50 years
ago
 Roles evolve and change over time
But,
 Stereotypes still dominate, and impede
 More synergy is required
 Some bridges exist, but we need to embody
these
Do these stereotypes persist?
Community
 Powerless
 Persistent
Providers
 In Silos
 Essential
Researchers
 Theoretical
 Opportunistic
Policy makers
 Powerful
 Sold out
All ourdifferent commitments need
nurturing
Different “projects” and goals for each sector
 Clinical treatment
 Health system improvement
 Program design
 Policy design
 Academic research
 Community based research
 Capacity building
 Advocacy
 Knowledge translation
Part 3
Strategies forgoing forward in
policy and
practice
Ourcollective aims
 To improve health care practices
 To change policies and policy making
 To deliver health information to women
 To generate support for gender analysis
and reform
 To generate new thinking and language
 To broaden the view of health
 To increase the evidence on women’s
health
Things to know about policy
making
 The cycle of government
 Budgets are made same time each year
 Internal processes are fixed
 Information is public
 Too little or too much funding?
 Speed
 Decisions are made quickly
 Policy is made quickly
 Decision making is not public
 Enacting decisions may take a long time
But politics matterthe most
 Politicians
 Tensions are normal
 Economics will rule
 Ideology will surface
 Public service
 Civil servants outlast politicians
 Leadership and championship matter
 Changing the policy making pro ce ss is the lasting
contribution
Things to know about engagement
 Network
 Who knows who and what position did they have
before?
 Who has a personal interest?
 The power of reacting
 One individual complaint can kill an initiative
 One community can kill a policy
 Write letters, they count and are counted
 Critical incidents and media coverage rule
Positioning the argument
 Enter the dialogue
 What is a ‘wicked problem’?
 What is a ‘killer fact’?
 How to exploit a ‘wedge issue’?
 Link to the platform
 Contortion or reality?
 Learning the language
 Being ready for the next ideology
Women’s health requires evidence,
engagement and economic overlay
 Has a tenuous position in government
 Corporate memory is short
 Sexism tenacious
 Must be renewed and refreshed continuously
 Personnel, politicians and deputies change
 Requires vigilance
 Take nothing for granted
 Needs economic arguments
 How can improving women’s health contribute?
 Framing women’s health in economic terms
Using the structure of government
to advance women’s health
 In Canada, for example
 GBA is required at the federal level, but not provincial
 Women’s health strategy is federal
 Federal government signs international treaties
 Federal government sets rights
 GBA was audited in 2009 by the Auditor General
A global view: Women’s health in all
policies Women’s health in all policies
 protect women’s property rights
 policies that support equal access to formal employment
 targeted action to encourage girls to enrol in and stay in
school
 health promotion to increase access of all adolescent
girls to health education
 measures that provide specific economic opportunities
for women
 measures that increase access to water, fuel and time-
saving technologies
 strategies to challenge gender stereotypes and change
discriminatory norms, practices and behaviours
 action to end all forms of violence against women
 building “age-friendly” environments for older women
World Health Organization, 2009
How do we need to shift our
approach?
Embrace biology, in conjunction
with social models of health
 Social determinants don’t fully explain, or intrigue,
scientists and policy makers
 Science is increasingly identifying more biological
issues that affect health
 Epigenetics is the frontier of explanation - the
interaction of environmental factors and genetic
factors
Drop the binaries, and accept,
embrace and teach, the fluidity of
concepts
 Sex, gender, (dis)ability & ‘ethnoracial’ categories are
increasingly diffuse and blurry
 Drop measuring “differences”, on the assumption that
there is a standard
 Adopt more complex views of the various factors
affecting women’s health
 Move into globalized views of women’s health
Contribute to betterdata collection
 Without data, we cannot measure progress
 Facilitates evaluation and costing
 Underpins the “business case”
 Can be used for performance management
 Will get noticed, if governments collect them
 Expand the notion of data and evidence
Finally, be bridge-builders for
women’s health
 Understand each sector’s role and responsibilities,
measures of success
 Actively assist with other sector’s goals
 Cultivate mutual support across sectors
 Travel across sectors in your own careers
 Engage in 21st
century consciousness-raising
Thankyou
The British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health
and its activities are supported by a financial contribution from
Health Canada, through the Women’s Health Contribution
Program

1.1.5 Lorraine Greaves

  • 1.
    Women’s health across timeand space 6th Australian Women’s Health Conference Hobart, Australia Lorraine Greaves, PhD, DU British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health Canada
  • 2.
    Goals 1. To reflecton progress in women’s health over the past 50 years 2. To identify conceptual developments in women’s health 3. To promote understanding of policy making 4. To recommend strategies going forward to improve women’s health policy and practice
  • 3.
    Keeping in mindfour“locations”  Providers  Academic researchers  Policy makers  Communities
  • 4.
    Messages  There hasbeen progress, lots of it  Conceptual approaches are in constant evolution  Evidence, engagement and economics matter in policy making  We need to be more strategic to secure our achievements
  • 5.
  • 6.
    2nd wave women’s movement Emerging politics of women’s liberation  Consciousness- raising  Control over body  Labour force participation and pay equity
  • 7.
    Including decades ofwomen’s health advocacy  Over-medicalization of women  Sexism & paternalism  Gender-neutrality and gender-blindness  Exclusion from trials  Lack of women in science and medicine
  • 9.
    Feminist Women's HealthCenter, Oregon Self-examination kits to avoid doctors and be self sufficient
  • 10.
    Home birth andmidwifery- avoiding hospital and reclaiming birthing
  • 11.
    Women’s health movement identifiedvalues to underpin care  Inclusive  Sensitive  Respectful  Empowering  Accessible  Comprehensive
  • 12.
    Since 1970 inCanada  Royal Commission on the Status of Women 1970  Women’s Health Bureau, 1993  Centres of Excellence for Women’s Health Program, 1996  Women’s Health Strategy, 1999  Gender analysis policy, 2000  Institute of Gender and Health, 2000
  • 13.
    Some achievements inthis time periodStructural changes  Rapidly increasing evidence and research on sex, gender and health  Introduction of gender analysis into policy  Creation of women-specific health care services Parallel processes  Infiltration of feminists into positions of influence  Evolution of consciousness raising into communities of practice and knowledge exchange  Global advocacy connecting women’s status to women’s health
  • 14.
    Key policies were,and are, very important  Institute of Medicine report (USA)  Argues importance of sex (and gender) in all pillars of health research “Every cell is sexed” (2001)  Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Institute of Gender and Health (2000)  Requires sex and gender analysis be included in all proposals  Health Canada, requires GBA of policies (audited by the Auditor General of Canada, 2009)  National Institutes of Health (USA)  NIH requires women, children and minorities be included in all research (1993)  Audited by the General Accounting Office 1999
  • 15.
    Led to newknowledge  Newly identified disease trajectories for women  Identification of diagnostic issues  Requirement for new treatment approaches  Shortcomings of rehabilitation identified  Health system design is gendered  Health reform is gendered
  • 16.
    Part 2 Some theoreticaland conceptual transitions
  • 17.
    The concepts, theissues  Sex  Gender  Diversity  Language clarity  Measurement issues  Capacity  (Re) training  Institutionalization  Knowledge transfer
  • 18.
    Sedimentary layers ofterminology and analytic frames over30 years  Sex  Gender  Sex and gender  Sex differences  Gender differences  Sex differences and gender influences  Sex and gender related factors  Gender equity  Sex stratification  Sex differentiation  Gender (based) analysis  Determinants of health  Sex and gender (based) analysis  Sex, gender and diversity (based) analysis  Disparities, inequities of health  Intersectional analysis  Intersectional-type analyses
  • 19.
    Parameters of thefield have evolved Health  Women’s health  Gender and health  Men’s health  Gender and women’s health  Gender and health, (including women’s health and men’s health)  Health equity  Now three fields: (at least)  gender and health  women’s health  men’s health
  • 20.
    Lessons?  Keep womenin sight  Being vigilant about diluting the focus on women  Broadening the field can generate support  Continuous adult education is necessary  Retain the historical values base  Embrace increasing complexity of conceptual development
  • 21.
    Sex and genderinteract Sex: biological and physiologically related factors  Metabolism, hormones, size, anatomy etc  Gender: social and cultural factors  Roles  Identity  Relations  Institutionalized gender
  • 22.
    Osteoarthritis & Osteoporosis Sex: Femalebodies are more likely to develop osteoarthritis or osteoporosis due to differences in bone structure, bone density, and hormones (Cenci et al., 2000; Riggs, 2000). Gender: Feminine gender roles do not encourage women to do weight-bearing exercises, which put women at risk for developing osteoarthritis and osteoporosis (Fausto-Sterling, 2005).
  • 23.
    Cardiovasculardisease Sex: Aspirin helpsprevent cardiovascular disease in men but not women due to genetics and hormones (Levin, 2005). Women may have different symptoms than men of CVD. Gender: Women may delay seeking care for cardiovascular health problems due to cultural expectations or their multiple roles within families, which may prevent them from taking time for themselves (Rosenfeld, Lindauer, and Darney, 2005)
  • 24.
    CardiovascularDisease (CVD) and Diversity Substantial ethnic differences in CVD exist; The death rate due to CVD is 69% higher in black women than white in the USA (American Heart Association, 1997).  Gender and class-linked differences associated with CVD risk factors include: smoking, hypertension, poor nutrition, diabetes, obesity (American Heart Association, 1997), access to health care and educational attainment (Nietert, Sutherland, Keil, & Bachman, 2006).
  • 25.
    Contracting HIV –sex and gender collide Sex: The vagina is more susceptible to contracting sexually transmitted infections (STIs) than the penis due to physiology (Darroch and Frost, 1999) Gender: Women can have less power in sexual relationships which puts them at a greater risk of contracting HIV (Amaro and Raj, 2000). And, women may delay seeking treatment for HIV/AIDS due to family and childcare obligations.
  • 26.
    Ourlocations have evolvedas well…  Community  Women and girls  Community organizations  Advocates  Activists  Providers  Health care providers  Social services  Hospitals  Health authorities  Researchers  Academics  Community based researchers  Polling firms  Policy makers  Government  Decision makers  Institutional leaders  Research funding agencies
  • 27.
    In reality, manylinkages between sectors Community Research Policy Care
  • 28.
    In reality, commongoals and movement  These sectors are overlapping sets  Less distinguishable now compared to 50 years ago  Roles evolve and change over time But,  Stereotypes still dominate, and impede  More synergy is required  Some bridges exist, but we need to embody these
  • 29.
    Do these stereotypespersist? Community  Powerless  Persistent Providers  In Silos  Essential Researchers  Theoretical  Opportunistic Policy makers  Powerful  Sold out
  • 30.
    All ourdifferent commitmentsneed nurturing Different “projects” and goals for each sector  Clinical treatment  Health system improvement  Program design  Policy design  Academic research  Community based research  Capacity building  Advocacy  Knowledge translation
  • 31.
    Part 3 Strategies forgoingforward in policy and practice
  • 32.
    Ourcollective aims  Toimprove health care practices  To change policies and policy making  To deliver health information to women  To generate support for gender analysis and reform  To generate new thinking and language  To broaden the view of health  To increase the evidence on women’s health
  • 33.
    Things to knowabout policy making  The cycle of government  Budgets are made same time each year  Internal processes are fixed  Information is public  Too little or too much funding?  Speed  Decisions are made quickly  Policy is made quickly  Decision making is not public  Enacting decisions may take a long time
  • 34.
    But politics matterthemost  Politicians  Tensions are normal  Economics will rule  Ideology will surface  Public service  Civil servants outlast politicians  Leadership and championship matter  Changing the policy making pro ce ss is the lasting contribution
  • 35.
    Things to knowabout engagement  Network  Who knows who and what position did they have before?  Who has a personal interest?  The power of reacting  One individual complaint can kill an initiative  One community can kill a policy  Write letters, they count and are counted  Critical incidents and media coverage rule
  • 36.
    Positioning the argument Enter the dialogue  What is a ‘wicked problem’?  What is a ‘killer fact’?  How to exploit a ‘wedge issue’?  Link to the platform  Contortion or reality?  Learning the language  Being ready for the next ideology
  • 37.
    Women’s health requiresevidence, engagement and economic overlay  Has a tenuous position in government  Corporate memory is short  Sexism tenacious  Must be renewed and refreshed continuously  Personnel, politicians and deputies change  Requires vigilance  Take nothing for granted  Needs economic arguments  How can improving women’s health contribute?  Framing women’s health in economic terms
  • 38.
    Using the structureof government to advance women’s health  In Canada, for example  GBA is required at the federal level, but not provincial  Women’s health strategy is federal  Federal government signs international treaties  Federal government sets rights  GBA was audited in 2009 by the Auditor General
  • 39.
    A global view:Women’s health in all policies Women’s health in all policies  protect women’s property rights  policies that support equal access to formal employment  targeted action to encourage girls to enrol in and stay in school  health promotion to increase access of all adolescent girls to health education  measures that provide specific economic opportunities for women  measures that increase access to water, fuel and time- saving technologies  strategies to challenge gender stereotypes and change discriminatory norms, practices and behaviours  action to end all forms of violence against women  building “age-friendly” environments for older women World Health Organization, 2009
  • 40.
    How do weneed to shift our approach?
  • 41.
    Embrace biology, inconjunction with social models of health  Social determinants don’t fully explain, or intrigue, scientists and policy makers  Science is increasingly identifying more biological issues that affect health  Epigenetics is the frontier of explanation - the interaction of environmental factors and genetic factors
  • 42.
    Drop the binaries,and accept, embrace and teach, the fluidity of concepts  Sex, gender, (dis)ability & ‘ethnoracial’ categories are increasingly diffuse and blurry  Drop measuring “differences”, on the assumption that there is a standard  Adopt more complex views of the various factors affecting women’s health  Move into globalized views of women’s health
  • 43.
    Contribute to betterdatacollection  Without data, we cannot measure progress  Facilitates evaluation and costing  Underpins the “business case”  Can be used for performance management  Will get noticed, if governments collect them  Expand the notion of data and evidence
  • 44.
    Finally, be bridge-buildersfor women’s health  Understand each sector’s role and responsibilities, measures of success  Actively assist with other sector’s goals  Cultivate mutual support across sectors  Travel across sectors in your own careers  Engage in 21st century consciousness-raising
  • 45.
    Thankyou The British ColumbiaCentre of Excellence for Women’s Health and its activities are supported by a financial contribution from Health Canada, through the Women’s Health Contribution Program

Editor's Notes

  • #7 Stereotypes by gender roles Reaction to post war domesticity
  • #8 Non academic Early 1970s Control over reproductive and sexual health Manifested in control over repro and sexual health Structured around avoiding contact with hospitals and doctors; seeking alternatives, such as home birth, midwifery, self exam, health information geared to women, homeopathic and natural herbal medicine. Paternalism and sexism manifested in “doctor knows best” attitude toward patient decisions; sexist authority over nurses; medicine especially gynecology, in the service of men and the patriarchy. Gender neutrality less obviously offensive, but there in the notions of not noticing women and female bodies. Perhaps women were just small men, and that was it, OR, perhaps men had all the important diseases? Set up practice and research that was not helping women, but rather focused on men or gender neutral (read male) aims and approaches Manifested in exclusion from research trials for drugs devices, treatments. Fuelled by the lack of women in both science and medicine, and I might say, the lack of men in nursing.
  • #9 Health information Frank approach to sex and health literacy Rejection of doctor centred paradigms of care
  • #12 CWHN 25th anniversary quilt, 1981-2006 Values that are now underpinning health care reform in government systems Engagement; access; satisfaction and quality; joined up?, respectful of diversity
  • #13 Had only 5 out of 167 recommendations pertain to women’s health But ushered in the 2nd wave of the women’s movement, in which a vibrant women’s health movement grew
  • #14 Imperatives in US and Canada to include sex in research proposals. Evidence collected in USA, but no analysis done. Journals need to impose requirement. Women’s versions of diseases such as lung cancer, COPD, CVD, turning out to be different diseases, with different etiology, trajectories and treatments Women’s diseases such as MS, Auto immune disorders, osteoporosis getting more attention Sex and its manifestations such as: hormones, anatomy, metabolism, size, shape, genes, physiology place all individuals on a continuum. Sometimes, men are large women! Evidence regarding genes, size and physiology affect our understanding of ethnic and “racial” groups health and disease trajectory. WH Centres are few in canada Federally supported in USA Small ambulatory clinics in canada with specialities GBA introduced but not analysed
  • #15 IOM pivotal in addressing ALL four pillars of research, including animal and human. Pivotal and influential statement, as was the Agenda for the 21st Century, womens health, also USA. This took on the terminology issue as well as the agenda setting problem Australian women’s health policy very NB Women’s health strategies, very NB Symbolic or real? Doesn’t matter. They exist as the backdrop for action, advocacy, policy makers and researchers. INVEST IN THIS
  • #16 Women’s diseases such as MS, Auto immune disorders, osteoporosis getting more attention Sex and its manifestations such as: hormones, anatomy, metabolism, size, shape, genes, physiology place all individuals on a continuum. Sometimes, men are large women! Evidence regarding genes, size and physiology affect our understanding of ethnic and “racial” groups health and disease trajectory. WH Centres are few in canada Federally supported in USA Small ambulatory clinics in canada with specialities GBA introduced but not analysed Health reform, waiting times, primary care, team care, utilization, access issues Health human resources are female and affected by gendered issues, such as SARS workers, again nursing workforce, double caregiving roles.
  • #18 Latter two including KTS E
  • #19 Left: Terms historically used Right: analytic frameworks offered
  • #20 In order, and again layered
  • #25 CVD, particularly coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke, is the number one killer of women in most developed countries. Despite overall reductions in death rates due to CVD, the rate of decline for women is less than men.
  • #27 These may look separate, but in fact they are not We started out with an us vs them. Women vs patriarchy Care providers vs institutions Then we went to community vs academy All vs government
  • #29 Integrated knowledge translation CBR, PAR Research to evidence based decision making Evidence based treatment and care Sophistication of health consumer Technological advances that assist in bringing all worlds closer to each other.
  • #30 These are stereotypes, but worth acknowledging or testing in your world. Are you critical of those women in other sectors, who may be in a different position or location? Are you collaborating? Do you recognize that all different positions are critically important? Community: engaged and relevant Provider: experienced and knowledgeable Researchers; questioning and funded Policy makers: embedded and political
  • #31 Layers mean all are kept, some might be older and have deeper roots, but are not irrelevant Not in the business of developing new perspectives in order to ditch the old, but rather to reflect all the facets of the diamond of sex and gender research, and more importantly to respect all of the projects that people are involved in.
  • #37 Wicked problems:Thus wicked problems are also characterised by the following: The solution depends on how the problem is framed and vice-versa (i.e. the problem definition depends on the solution) Stakeholders have radically different world views and different frames for understanding the problem. The constraints that the problem is subject to and the resources needed to solve it change over time. The problem is never solved definitively. The solution depends on how the problem is framed and vice-versa (i.e. the problem definition depends on the solution) Stakeholders have radically different world views and different frames for understanding the problem. The constraints that the problem is subject to and the resources needed to solve it change over time. The problem is never solved definitively. There is no definitive formulation of a wicked problem. Wicked problems have no stopping rule. Solutions to wicked problems are not true-or-false, but better or worse. There is no immediate and no ultimate test of a solution to a wicked problem. Every solution to a wicked problem is a "one-shot operation"; because there is no opportunity to learn by trial-and-error, every attempt counts significantly. Wicked problems do not have an enumerable (or an exhaustively describable) set of potential solutions, nor is there a well-described set of permissible operations that may be incorporated into the plan. Every wicked problem is essentially unique. Every wicked problem can be considered to be a symptom of another problem. The existence of a discrepancy representing a wicked problem can be explained in numerous ways. The choice of explanation determines the nature of the problem's resolution. The planner has no right to be wrong (planners are liable for the consequences of the actions they generate HiAP is a more promising way of tackling "wicked problems" because it helps mitigate the compounding factors that make them wicked. e.g. permanent poverty is a "wicked problem" -- it's a bad thing that is made worse and harder to escape by other bad things, leading to a vicious cycle.  whichever problem in the cycle you try to address (poverty, low education, unemployment), you can't get traction because each factor slides into the next one. Hence health policy makers and social policy makers and everyone throws up their hands and says they can't fix the problem in their sector unless all the other problems are fixed as well.  HiAP tries to reduce the causal connection between the things in that cycle, so that even if one you're poor, at least you might have a healthier physical environment and better health education and better housing etc.  This should in principle make the problems less wicked or cyclical, even though it can't diffuse the problems altogether.  As for "killer facts," here's the one on SDOH.  Keon's report attributes health to the following: biology: 15% health care system: 25% socioeconomic factors: 50% physical environment: 10%
  • #38 Killer fact: 85% of health care workers are women; women make the majority of visits to the health care system; healthy women = healthy children; Addicted women have three reasons for not accessing treatment, fear, shame and guilt. Economic costs of violence in Canada are 4.2 billion per year (1995)- 87% of which are borne by government
  • #42 Conversion to SDOH a bit religious when it happens. However, there is a lack of sustained interest in SDOH simply because of silo responsibility. Solutions to SDOH are multisectoral and cross governmental, so until structures change there is little hope of changing this. In economic crisis that health care takes up 46% of budget, sustainability issues are of primary importance, so more attention may be paid to changing structures. Lung cancer in non smoking women, mix of hormones, environment (SHS) and lung characteristics and interpersonal power Lung cancer in smoking women. Mix of hormones, airways, lung size, gendered style of smoking, type of cigarettes marketed to women (lights) and social trends. Lung cancer in smoking women, mix of lung anatomy, gendered marketing of lights, and style of smoking.
  • #43 Intersectional type analyses Continuua Less surety and discreteness Requires flexibility and growth, keeping up, and reducing to simple messaging NOTE: still need to reduce to binaries on occasion , for those who are new to the concepts. Need to go thru the same learning curves.
  • #45 NP knowledge transfer in CoPs on line. Global application May 31, WNTD