2. Plymouth Rock Assurance
Automobile and homeowners insurance in Northeast US
Where we operate
2
Current
Future
3. Auto Insurance Abuse
Premium-related
Misrepresentations on application form: garaging address,
accident/violation history, homeowner status, etc.
Fake insurance broker collecting premium from
unsuspecting customers
Claims-related
Staged car accidents
Phantom uninsured motorist
Exaggerated/questionable injuries
3
4. Questionable Injury Example
An insurance customer in New Jersey, “David”, has
minor car accident on his 22nd birthday
David does not go to ER or seek any medical
treatment shortly after the accident
Two weeks after the accident, David goes to a
chiropractor after claiming to feel pain
No observable physical injury, just unverifiable claims of
pain
For next six months, chiropractor treats David 3-4
times a week for 2+ hours per session
Chiropractor also engages in suspicious billing tactics
4
5. Questionable Injury Example
David also goes to an acupuncture specialist for
additional remedies for seven months
More questionable billing practices occur at this practice
This pattern continues with several more medical
specialists
After one year, David’s medical bills total $70,000
across six different medical specialists
Under New Jersey no-fault insurance coverage,
David’s auto insurance pays the entire $70K despite
little evidence of actual injury
5
6. Abuse Detection/Prevention
Text Mining
Anomaly Detection
Social Media Analysis
Predictive Modeling + Smart Claims Handling
Graph Analytics
6
8. Handling Abusive Claims
Abuse triaging tactics
Request independent medical exam
Question customer on inconsistencies
Question medical provider on suspicious billing
But triaging is most effective early in the claims process
How to identify abusive claims early?
Solution: predictive modeling
8
9. Abuse Prevention System
Construct a predictive model that can flag abusive
claims early in the claims-handling process, and then
route the claim to the appropriate handlers
9
Predictive
Model
Settle
Settle
Claims
Specialists
Regular Claims
Staff
Flagged
Abusive
Not
flagged
Suspicious
Activity
10. Predictive Model
Modeling data: accident, insurance policy, vehicle,
demographic, weather conditions, etc.
Trained on years of historical data
Modeling technique: Gradient Boosted Decision Tree
Modeling software: H2O
10
+ + + Prediction
11. Predictive Modeling Results
Historical claims
Correctly identified ~60% of abusive claims shortly after
accident was reported
Seven-figure potential annual cost savings!
Current claims
Abusive billing patterns reduced by 40%
Useful features in predictive model
Policy tenure: longer-staying customers are less abusive
Lag between accident and report date: longer lags are more
abusive
11
12. Challenges
For new claims, difficult to gauge model’s accuracy on a
specific claim because of intervention by claims
specialists
Example:
• Model correctly predicts claim will be abusive
• Claim specialists successfully intervene to stop abuse, i.e. no abuse occurs
• Therefore model prediction appears to be wrong, but it’s not!
Possible solution: A/B testing
Some claims flagged by predictive model are not sent to
specialists, i.e. abuse is allowed to take place
Potential costs are high
12
14. Graph Analytics Overview
Medical providers sharing the same customers can be
linked together in a network
High counts indicate collusion because legitimate medical
providers across different medical practices rarely share >2
customers
14
All Past
Claims
Chiro
David
Phys
Ther
David
David
Acup Chiro
4
customers
Phys
Ther
7
customers
5
customers
Acup
15. Example of Provider Network
Real example of NJ network with known abusive providers
15