FruitBreedomics – Technical Session
Sampling procedures:
Hands on experience and practical details
I. Baumgartner (Agroscope)
San Giuseppe di Comacchio (Italy),
June 19th 2015
Overview
• 96-well format – why?
• Coding systems for plant identification
• Demonstration on steps of leave sampling
procedure
Companies process samples in a 96-well format
Coding systems for individual plant identification
Individual labeling of seedlings
• combination number
• seedling number
• (parents, resistances)
Positional coding system
• 4 plates of 6 x 4 pots represent 96-well
plate
• No individual seedling labeling
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
1 - I 1 - II
1 - III 1 - IV
Positional coding system I
Plants in 4 plates of 6 x 4 pots Leave samples in 96-well plate
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
1 - I 1 - II
1 - III 1 - IV
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
2 - I 2 - II
2 - III 2 - IV
Positional coding system II
LGC leaf sampling I
LGC leaf sampling II
LGC leaf sampling III
• Plates of 6 x 4 pots allowed plant identification
without labelling
• Coding system not easy for processing of plants
• Missing plants were replaced by living plants to
fill up gaps in the plates (cost), laborious
• Puncturing the leaves and expedition of the
plates was efficient
• The whole procedure was more time-consuming
than expected
• Costs are relatively low, DNA extraction is the
most expensive, data point to low price
• Close interaction with the company
(LGC genomics) was required and successful KASP - SNP Genotyping
MAB experiences
Thank you for your attention
powdery mildew
Agroscope good food, healthy environment

02 baumgartner

  • 1.
    FruitBreedomics – TechnicalSession Sampling procedures: Hands on experience and practical details I. Baumgartner (Agroscope) San Giuseppe di Comacchio (Italy), June 19th 2015
  • 2.
    Overview • 96-well format– why? • Coding systems for plant identification • Demonstration on steps of leave sampling procedure
  • 3.
    Companies process samplesin a 96-well format
  • 4.
    Coding systems forindividual plant identification Individual labeling of seedlings • combination number • seedling number • (parents, resistances) Positional coding system • 4 plates of 6 x 4 pots represent 96-well plate • No individual seedling labeling
  • 5.
    1 2 34 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A B C D E F G H 1 - I 1 - II 1 - III 1 - IV Positional coding system I Plants in 4 plates of 6 x 4 pots Leave samples in 96-well plate
  • 6.
    1 2 34 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A B C D E F G H 1 - I 1 - II 1 - III 1 - IV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A B C D E F G H 2 - I 2 - II 2 - III 2 - IV Positional coding system II
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 11.
    • Plates of6 x 4 pots allowed plant identification without labelling • Coding system not easy for processing of plants • Missing plants were replaced by living plants to fill up gaps in the plates (cost), laborious • Puncturing the leaves and expedition of the plates was efficient • The whole procedure was more time-consuming than expected • Costs are relatively low, DNA extraction is the most expensive, data point to low price • Close interaction with the company (LGC genomics) was required and successful KASP - SNP Genotyping MAB experiences
  • 12.
    Thank you foryour attention powdery mildew Agroscope good food, healthy environment