When One Thinks Of The Word Ague, They Automatically Think

When One Thinks Of The Word Ague, They Automatically Think
When one thinks of the word ague, they automatically think of a heated discussion between two
parties advocating for entirely different things. One could easily imagine two roman senators
arguing in the republic of Rome with their togas and audience. Many times like Deborah Tannen's
stated in her article The Argument Culture, "When you're having an argument with someone you're
usually not trying to understand what the other person is saying" (488). However, this situation does
not only belong to senators and congressmen. Normal and average people fall into a spiral of
statements and rebuttals seeking to argue and win over any given topic. This never ending instinct to
win and demolish any opposition has made its way into everyday life. The ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
It is only when misinterpretation or lack of knowledge causes such person to botch the discussion
and converts a simple discussion into a cut throat argument. When a discussion is botched, an
argument is birthed. In this case Tannen explains "when you 're having an argument with someone,
you 're usually not trying to understand what the other person is saying, or what in their experience
leads them to say it" (488). In other words, one does not consider what the other side of the
argument is advocating for. Nor do they consider what that other person went through. This causes
what Purdue University's, the writing lab, considers as an "Either/ or" logical fallacy. This local
fallacy "is a conclusion that oversimplifies the argument by reducing it to only two sides or choices"
(OWL). This logical orientation many people choose to use in their arguments and nothing has
changed. One example is Planned Parenthood. The topic of planned Parenthood is an organization
that provides sex education and very commonly women's health services. A right wing political
figure like Arizona's, Jon Kyl, would have said in Coleman's article "Ninety percent of what Planned
Parenthood does is provide abortions.". Statements like these provide the misinformed sentiment to
the public. It creates the excuse for there to rely on his title as a source of credibility in his
statements. People with the anti–sentiment against an organization designed to help parents can only
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Here Be Monsters Ted Genoway Analysis
Monster exists long time ago and they are everywhere. However, there are different types of
monster, some that are good and some that are bad. Many people that watched monster films get the
desire of being one of the monsters that appears in the film. This essay will argue the different
aspects and effects that monsters have in a person. I will use two article that will help explain the
differences aspects and actions of the monster. One of the articles is "Here Be Monsters" by Ted
Genoways, second article is "Fear of the Monster is Really a Kind of Desired" by Jeffrey Jerome
Cohen. "Monster can function as an alter ego, as an alluring projection of (an Other) self" (Cohen,
190). Furthermore, this essay will show some fallacies that the author ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The author started by presenting the problem with monsters and how does it affect the human's
imagination. Next, Genoways presents a little bit of what happened during World War II, also
"discussing the public panic that occurred after Orson Welles's famous broadcast of War of the
Worlds" (Genoways, 130). Later the author presents his legitimacy knowledge on both sides of the
argument. Genoways uses examples of the real life event that happen in the United States in order to
explain how the fear of the past is similar to the fear in now in days but deeper. Third, the author
presents his point of view. Which is that if a human being gave in their fear will face the real
possibility of losing their freedom. Lastly, he explains that humans need to find a way to being seen
as a strong community, and that everywhere we go, there are

Embryonic Research
Many women are eager to become a mother, but infertility prevents some women from satisfying
this need. However, modern biotechnologies combined with changed norms of culture now provide
them reproductive choices such as in vitro fertilization. In order to develop these reproductive
choices, we need to research on living human embryo. Because its procedures terminate the life of
embryo, embryonic research stirs up public attention on its morality. Society questions if these
methods are morally right. Do they violate the meaning of personhood and life? Do we kill a human
when we research the embryos? These questions are asking our foundation of morality. We must be
cautious and avoid any logical fallacies when we answer them. Using ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In this essay, Gorovitz points out several logical fallacies in embryonic research opponent essays,
including Kass'. For instance, one of his arguments is that opposing essays usually use slippery
slope arguments, stating that starting of artificial insemination would lead us to social disaster (117).
He argues that the slippery slope arguments are not valid in this discussion because they never
provide any rational evidences why we cannot stop after we start down this path. Gorovitz claims
that "Collectively we have significant capacity to exercise judgment and control" (118) so the
practice of artificial insemination will not lead us to the disaster. There are few more ill logics in
Kass' and other opposing essays that Gorovitz has pointed out. Ironically, however, logical fallacies
he uses to attack his opponents also appear in his essay too.
Another Gorovitz's important argument is the argument against Kass' statement, "The human
embryo is not mere meat; it is not just stuff; it is not a 'thing'" (Kass 102). Gorovitz argues that
according to Kass' statement, human cadavers which are also not mere meat, not just stuff, not the
thing, should be protected from being used for research purpose too. But since it is acceptable to use
human cadavers in research, in medical education, and in organs transplant, Gorovitz claims that
these using of cadavers justify using of embryos as well. In this comparison,

Analysis Of Mark Edmundson 's ' On The Uses Of A Liberal...
The Proper Use of Fragments Mark Edmundson, the author of "On the Uses of a Liberal Education",
is an English teacher at the University of Virginia who expresses his concerns about the trajectory of
the universities and colleges in America. Edmundson depicts how college students today have "little
fire, little passion to be found," towards their classes (4). In an effort to find the source of this lack
of passion, Edmundson describes contacting other professors about this issue while refining his own
ideas. Ultimately, Edmundson comes to a conclusion. He believes that the consumer mindset of
college students has hindered American universities as a whole. My target audience is my professor,
Professor Chezik. Looking closely at his wording, formation of sentences, and idea structure, one
can see a recurring theme throughout Edmundson's essay. Edmundson uses fragments, specifically
at the beginning of his paragraphs, to start his point, pose counter arguments, and to have a poetic
refrain. Edmundson uses fragments to effectively begin his point. His first use of a fragment, seen
on the very first page, is used in discussion of his student's assessment of the course.
"What is your evaluation of the instructor?" asks question number eight, entreating them to circle a
number between five (excellent) and one (poor,poor). Whatever interpretive subtlety they've
acquired during the term is now out the window. Edmundson: one to five, stand and shoot.
And they do. (Edmundson 1)

By Definition Miracles Do Not Occur Essay
By Definition Miracles Do Not Occur
Even in this modern age, belief in the miraculous is widespread and is a feature of many world
religions, including the Christian faith where miracles have played a significant role.
It is important attempt to define what a miracle is, as this in itself is a source for debate. Today the
term 'miracle' in many different ways and the idea is open to many interpretations.
A miracle can be defined in a number of ways, firstly as an unexpected change for the better. This
centres miracles in people's treatment of each other, not necessarily demanding the idea of a creator
God, although it can be interpreted as being God's action (here a change can be deemed ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is with this definition of miracles that the majority of arguments occur, with some claiming them
to be obvious signs of God's reality and active presence within the world, with some such miracles
being incorporated in arguments for religious experience. We see examples of such RSSE in the
gospels. For many Christian's miracles, demonstrate God's care for his creation and show God's
willingness to intervene to change things for the better. Such examples of RSSE are not confined to
the times of Jesus, but have occurred in the fairly recent past especially in the Catholic Church (who
undertake a strict procedure in ascertaining the validity of miracles) e.g. Lourdes, The miraculous
recovery of John Fagen, which lead to the sainthood of John Ogillve etc.
Scholars such as Hume, and scientists such as Dawkins, believe that 'miracles' have natural
explanations and are only seen as miraculous due to ignorance (as science advances forward so faith
retreats). They believe that there are no real miracles but events that can be better explained in
scientific terms (the plagues, walking on water etc) or are simply fabricated.
The German scholar Rudolf Bultmann took a similarly sceptical view of miracles and argued that
the world view of the Bible was unacceptable in a modern, scientific age. Bultmann reasoned that
the

Essay about Argument and Natural Selection
1. "I like the rain. Some people will tell you that the sun is the best, but they are wrong. What waits
for you in the sun? Skin cancer. What waits for you in the rain? Puddles to jump in. I'll take puddles
over cancer any day." Tell me as much as you can about this passage as an argument (especially the
parts). p1. Sun will bring skin cancer. p2. Rain will bring puddles that we can jump. p3: Pain is bad,
joy is good. If a thing causes more good things than bad things, then it is better. p4: If A is better
than B, then we should like A. p5. Puddles are better than skin cancer because it creates more joy
than pain.
Conclusion: I like rain better.
2. Find an argument from an external source (make sure to tell me where it is from). ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Its strengths are that it allows me to pursuit my goal selfishly without worrying about others, and it
allows me to provide a simple theory for many phenomena in the world. Its weaknesses are that I
care too much about my wants and needs without considering others' needs and wants, and the
model ignores other fundamental motives like parental cares, self–esteem, belonging, and etc.
4. Tell me about a model that you have not internalized. What are its strengths/weaknesses?
A model that I have not internalized is the belief that a person should find their own love instead of
obeying his or her parents' arrangement. A strength of this model is that people can follow their
dreams and have freedom. A weakness of this model is that people are usually driven by their sexual
drives while ignoring many important factors when it comes to marriage (personality, family
background and etc.). Parents often have more experiences and thus are more objective when
choosing a mate.
5. Tell me about a way that people around you have influenced your thinking for the better.
When I discuss something of which I am certain with people who held different opinions, they
sometime provides counter examples or reasons that I haven't thought of, which makes me
reconsider my thoughts more closely.
6. Tell me about a way that people around you have influenced your thinking for the worse.
When I discuss something that I am

Logical Fallacies. Logical Fallacies Can Be Found In Many
Logical Fallacies
Logical Fallacies can be found in many forms of persuasions, in infomercials, political debates,
common discussion, everywhere. Although Logical Fallacies are very common, they mar our
arguments and should be avoided. In order to avoid them we must first learn to recognize them. To
fully understand Logical Fallacies, we will look at the definition of Logical Fallacies, some
examples of Logical Fallacies, classifications of Logical Fallacies, and finally why we should, and
how we can, avoid them.
In simplest form, Logical Fallacies are fallacious arguments, fallacious meaning logically unsound
or misleading. However a more in depth understanding can be constructed from three definitions for
Logical Fallacies. The first is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Schmidt's article, On Classifications of Fallacies including the author's own classification system.
Although they all attempted to classify the complicated Logical Fallacies, most of the philosophers
presented in On Classifications of Fallacies agreed that there was no definite way to classify Logical
Fallacies. The classification of Logical Fallacies was first tackled in 350 B.C., by Greek philosopher
Aristotle, and continues to be tackled, as philosophers search for a better way to define them. In
general Logical Fallacies are defined by where the logic goes wrong, however one philosopher,
Ronald Munson, attempted to classify them according to what type of argument they "support"
(Schmidt). No matter the way the classification system is drawn there is always Fallacies that
crossover into multiple categories. Any classification system that eliminates crossovers is too
complex to fulfil the purpose of a classifying, which is to simplify. The classifications found in
Schmidt's article On Classifications of Fallacies, attempt to create formal classification systems,
however in our pursuit of understanding Logical Fallacies a simple working classification will do
fine.
The Purdue Owl article, Logical Fallacies, provides a simple classification, "Fallacies can be either
illegitimate arguments or irrelevant points" (Weber). From my understanding illegitimate argument
Logical Fallacies rely on faulty evidence or misrepresented evidence to support

The Church Of Liberalism By Ann Coulter
Brittany Zeock
James Holland & Michael Martin
Government & Politics in the US
4/30/15
Ramblings of the Ill–informed
In Godless: The Church of Liberalism, published by Three Rivers Press in 2007, author Ann Coulter
argues that liberalism has become a religion despite liberals rejecting god and religion. On the first
page Coulter writes, "Of course liberalism is a religion. It has its own cosmology, its own miracles .
. . its own churches, its own high priests, its own saints, its own total worldview, and its own
explanation of the existence of the universe. In other words, liberalism contains all the attributes of
what is generally known as a religion." Coulter attempts to draw many parallels between liberals
and religious people in the beginning of the book. Coulter then gets into the ideologies that the
"liberal religion" possesses in the chapters to follow. This includes Coulter's assertion that liberals
love violent criminals, but hate fetuses because all liberals oppose the death penalty and support
abortions. Coulter's overgeneralizations continue when she rants and yells about the liberal media's
adoration for educators and how teachers are the saints for leftists and schools are like churches of
socialism. Then Coulter states that educators are indoctrinating students with false beliefs in
evolution and turning children away from Christianity. Finally, Coulter attempts to disprove
evolution a very small amount understanding of what evolution really is. In Godless: The

Issues Surrounding The Legalization Of Euthanasia
This essay will critically discuss slippery slope arguments with reference to the issues surrounding
the legalization of euthanasia. Firstly, the foundations of a slippery slope argument will be
discussed, along with the usual fallacious nature of this type of argument, also to be discussed, is if
slippery slope arguments ever provide good reasons for accepting their conclusions. Secondly,
euthanasia will be introduced and discussed, this will be done using an example of a slippery slope
argument by John Keown from his book Euthanasia, ethics and public policy: and argument against
legalization. From this example, the morality of euthanasia will be discussed as to whether slippery
slope arguments show that euthanasia is immoral. Lastly, euthanasia will be discussed with
reference utilitarianism, and if euthanasia would potentially be viewed as a good or moral option by
utilitarian theory or if it would be viewed as immoral. Slippery slope arguments are often used to
argue that if we allow something to become legal we will be stepping onto the slippery slope to
allowing something viewed as morally wrong to also become legal. These arguments are used often
within society, although most of the time they are used in a casual manner and the distance between
point A and B is so large they are not taken seriously, (Spielthenner, 2010; Jefferson, 2014). For that
reason slippery slope arguments as a general idea are not considered to be good logical arguments.
So, slippery slope

Is There a God?
The question on whether there is a God is not very easy to answer. There are two many sides to this
question. There is the scientific side that shows that man has evolved over time to its current state.
Then there is the theological side that says that God created man, the earth, and the heavens. But
what is the real answer or is there any answer at all.
When looking at the theological side of this question one must have faith and believe that there is a
God. They must take the word of others and books like the Bible to show them that there is a God.
Rev. Billy Graham, a firm believer in God, presents a very fallacious argument in his speech. Cline
(2014) defines a fallacy as "Fallacies are defects in an argument – other than false premises – which
cause an argument to be invalid, unsounds or weak" (para. 1). This is mostly done by Graham's
failure to ever give any evidence or verifiable facts of Gods existence at in time in his speech. All of
Graham's references to God in his speech have to do with someone's feelings they are not tangible
facts that can be touched or verified. There is only really one section of Graham's speech that has
any facts that can be verified and that is when he is speaking of King David. When talking about
King David Graham (1998) states "The Bible says that David laid up great stores of iron, and which
archaeologists have found, that in present–day Palestine, there are evidences of that generation"
(para. 8). While there has been some recent

How Do Baby Teresa Benefit Other Children
Is it wrong to take Baby Teresa's life so she can donate her organs to others in need even though she
can only live for a few days? Although some might argue that it is morally wrong to take an
innocent person's life, she could be saving many others' lives by donating her organs. I will be
defending the Benefits Argument in this paper, and I will argue that transplanting the organs will
indeed benefit other children. I will first present a general overview of the Baby Teresa case, and
then I will present the facts to my Benefits Argument. I will then present an opposing argument, how
someone would attack my views, and then I will defend my argument from the objection. Finally, in
the conclusion I will give certain highlights and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Baby Teresa died 9 days after her birth and because her organs were so badly deteriorated, it was too
late for other children because her organs could not be transplanted. (Rachels, pg. 1–2)
My argument for the transplant of her organs is the Benefits Argument. My view is that because
Baby Teresa was going to die soon and the transplant would not cause her pain because her brain is
missing, her organs were doing her no good. She would not be able to have a life even if she did
survive, carry on any activities, have thoughts, feelings, and relations with other people. In contrast,
if she would gain from keeping her life, then transplanting her organs would be wrong. My
argument is as follows: Since the transplant can benefit someone without harming others, we ought
to do so. The organs would certainly benefit others without harming Baby Teresa, so therefore we
should take her organs. This argument is sound because the premises are true and the conclusion
logically follows the premise. It is important that the intention of the transplant is to benefit other
children; otherwise taking Baby Teresa's life would be wrong. (Rachels, pg. 3)
An objection to my argument would be that although we assume that Baby Teresa's organs can help
benefit others, what if it cannot? My Benefits Argument will show to be invalid if her organs or
blood type did not match any recipients. It is unlikely that her organs or blood type do not match,
but there is that possibility.

Acuscan Critical Thinking Case Study
Assignment Overview
Prepare a report for the CEO about this situation in two parts:
Part One: Respond to the specific questions on the worksheet that follows (100 points possible).
Part Two: Write an executive summary for the CEO (100 points possible).
PART ONE:
Use the case materials to complete this assignment.
ANALYSIS
1. Describe one (per instructors change week one) assumptions seen in any documents provided.
a. Kelly – Through several emails and communications, Kelly assume that there is not enough time
to meet the deadline of August for the project. Even though Pat seems to show that, there is some
chance to do so.
b. Pat – believes that an "Operation Optimization" project needs to be embarked on now to improve
the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
b. Pat Lambert – in the position of marketing has a good grasp of the market place and the
economics of their segment. With this information, Pat 's arguments are sound and logical.
c. Kelly Thomas – arguments for the most part are emotional and unsound. Kelly seems to view the
others are trying to remove power from him.
d. Chris Martinas – arguments seem to more emotional and some what sound. He is basing a lot on
his experience as the VP of product and the understanding of the market segment and the limitation
of the current product.
4. Describe specific fallacious arguments, and identify the people who hold them.
a. There are several in the company that believe that the new product will increase the companies
market share and stay in front of their competitors. The stakeholders for the new product are Chris,
Cliff, and Pat. Cliff, being the CEO, has directed the others to venture to other market segments and
position the new product in those markets. There are some in the organization, like Kelly that
believe that AcuScan does not have to have a full feature new product to be released to the market.
There are some issues with how Acuscan is going to finance the new product. These concerns are
coming from Cliff.
CONCLUSIONS
5. Describe all problems in this situation.
The largest issue is the deadline that has been imposed by what some inside information about the
company 's competitors. This along with economical issues and reduced budget has

Allowing College Students To Have Guns On Campus
Mass college shootings are becoming more and more common each day, happening all over the
country. This is an issue that requires a solution. Some people believe that allowing college students
to have guns on campus will help solve the issue. Numerous states have already started passing bills
that allow guns on campuses, and many more are trying. The Editorial Board at The Arizona
Republic are fighting against these laws, as seen in their editorial "Our View: Time to allow guns on
campus? No.". The authors use various points in hopes of bringing awareness to this issue and to
persuade the reader that allowing college students to have guns will not solve any issues, but will
only bring upon more. When taking a stance on a controversial topic, it is important to be aware of
all sides of the argument, and this article is effective in acknowledging these opinions. The authors
of the article recognize some people with other arguments do make a few good ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Towards the end of the article the authors use an anecdotal fallacy, and compare college shootings to
a situation that happened in Arizona. "Arizona's personal experience with mass murder also shows
the dangers of relying on armed civilians to keep the peace" this line is using the authors' personal
experience as a stance against having guns on campus (Our View). This argument is not strong, and
is more of a shot at the citizens in Arizona rather than a point for their side. A few lines later, the
articles attack an opinion that people of the other side may have "It is fallacious to think that simply
having more guns at the scene of a massacre will result in less chaos and less death. It could easily
make things worse" (Our View). Even though that is their opinion on the issue, they just attacked
their opponents rather than stating why they feel having guns could make issues

C. S. Lewis The Screwta Letters
With social media at the people's disposal, users are able to share their thoughts and to keep up to
date with current events. Its no surprise to find issues trending on social media every now and then;
this year's election was no exception. Politics are without a doubt a greatly debated topic. Millions
of post and articles taking sides flew all across social media; some were true while others were not.
A supposed satire letter written by author C.S. Lewis became popular throughout social media
during the campaigns. Letter is as followed:
My dear Wormwood,
Be sure that the patient remains completely fixated on politics. Arguments, political gossip, and
obsessing on the faults of people they have never met serves as an excellent distraction from
advancing in personal virtue, character, and the things the patient can control. Make sure to keep the
patient in a constant state of angst, frustration and general disdain towards the rest of the human race
in order to avoid any kind of charity or inner peace from further developing. Ensure that the patient
continues to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Lewis. This paper will analyze the argument of the passage above by parsing it, examining formal
and informal proof, while also discussing its fallacies.
Transitional paragraph.
In order to parse the passage we will use Stephen Toulmin's structural model of argument.
Consisting of a diagram, Toulmin's model allows the argument to be broken down into six elements.
Evidence – Facts and data that can be used to support the claim.
Warrant – Reasoning that connects the evidence to claim. Helps show the relevance of the evidence.
Claim – Conclusion being established.
Support for the Warrant – Provides strength for the warrant.
Reservation – Condition in which the claim can be negated. Provides a possibility that the claim
may be

Thank You for Smoking
Nica Javier CRITHIN A62 Ms. Hazel Biana August 5, 2013 "Thank You for Smoking" film viewing
Identifying fallacies paper. The movie, "Thank You for Smoking" is a comedy with a tobacco
industry lobbyist, Nick Naylor as the lead. The movie has an eerie comic theme which tackles the
serious issue of the addicting substance of tobacco, or to be more specific, nicotine. The idea which
the movie was trying to portray was that this lobbyist was a great speaker who is able to manipulate
many a feeble–mind. A lobbyist, to begin with, is one who is employed to persuade all–concerned of
the employer's concern(s), in this case, the marketing of tobacco products. The thing about Naylor
was, he had a confident approach to almost ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
She simply failed to present him with quality evidence. More identifiable fallacies presented in the
said movie comprise of the event wherein BR, Naylor's boss, approves of Naylor's suggestion on
how they will be able to circulate or sell more cigarettes by showing famous figures smoking and
BR tells the rest present in the meeting to, "slam your fucking brains against your desks until
something useful comes out!"

Acuscan Critical Case Study
AcuScan Critical Case Study
To: Cliff O 'Connor – CEO
From: Pete xxxxx – V.P. of Organizational Development
As the new Vice President of Organizational Development, I look forward to the upcoming
challenges concerning developing the Organizational Development department. I anticipate exciting
times ahead as we pursue a new course with the development of a new product based on our current
retinal scanning technology.
It is apparent from the recent Scanner 's Weekly and a Memo I received, that this company is at a
crossroads concerning its future in the retinal scanning security business. Per your request, I have
solicited information from all parties involved to make an informed consensus as to what is really
going on.
Assumptions: ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
4. Assumed staff would work together amidst the challenges for the good of the company.
Arguments:
Cliff O 'Connor: Argument made by Cliff that a new product would "recapture our position as a
market leader with our technology." Cliff further argues that Pat 's creativity is what AcuScan needs
right now. Sees "Operation Optimize" as not very different from the iScanner product and believes
all managers realize the need for a new product to expand revenues. Pat Lambert: Argues that
iScanner should be modified and launched in a new, non–vertical market, only solution for long–
term growth in revenue. Pat argues that Kelly initially stated it is simple to build on existing
applications. Finally, Pat also argues for additional money, for an outside contractor to complete the
product on time. Kelly Thomas: Kelly argued that new product was more complicated to develop
than the other managers could comprehend. Kelly believes company is rushing to develop new
product, at the expense of quality; thus possibly damaging his teams and company 's reputation.
Chris Martinas: Arguments were the company must expand into other vertical markets. He also
believed they needed to act quickly or risk losing any advantage in the new market. Lastly, agrees
with Pat that new product will save the company.
Analysis of Arguments: Cliff 's argument for an additional means of revenue is logical but his
approach, developing a new product when the

Case Study for Acuscan, Inc Essay
Critical Case Study Assignment
Maurine Shaughnessy
GEN/480
Paul C. Moretti, M.B.A.
September 12, 2006
I am the newly hired Vice President of Organizational Development. My responsibilities include
creating the Organizational Development Department. I look forward to working with all of you
especially with finding a new and improved product based on our already developed retinal
scanning system iScanner. First of all I am going to discuss assumptions made by Kelly Thomas, Pat
Lambert, Cliff O'Connor and Chris Martinas. After each employee assumptions will be their
arguments and my evaluation of whether the argument is sound or unsound and why.
Kelly Thomas – Senior Engineer, Product Development
1. Assumed that Pat, Director of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
2. Assumed programmers had plenty of time to work on new product even though he knew staff was
cut last year.
3. Assumed because they were not agreeing with him they were not committed to the new product.
4. Assumed that the job could be done by outside contractors in the specified time frame. Also with
money being a problem.
5. Assumed a meeting would resolve all problems.
6. Assumed the customer would be happy with whatever product was developed and launched.
7. Assumed Kelly was being a "smart ass" because he questioned his knowledge about QC.
Pat argued that the scanner needed to be launched in retail, not banks or other easy markets. He also
argued with Chris, Kelly's manager, that Kelly informed him that it would not be a problem to
expand the iScanner. Another argument he made is he had bigger problems than to listen to than
answering other questions presented by other staff members. Pats decision to launch a new product
in a new market was sound. To be the first company on the market with a new product to get ahead
of your competitors is a good market strategy. His idea to use an outside contractor was unsound
because we are already in a budget deficit and there is now guarantee that the contractor would have
the product completed in time. His statement about having bigger problems than to answer questions
from other staff members was an emotional one. I think he felt nobody wanted to work with

Fallacy Essays
Fallacy
three logical fallacies that are used in this paper are Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc, Far–Fetched
Hypothesis, and False Dilemma. What is a fallacy? A fallacy is viewed as an error in reasoning. To
be more exact, a fallacy is an "argument" in which the premises given for the conclusion do not
provide the needed degree of support. A logical fallacy is an error in logical argument which is
independent of the truth of the premises. When there is a fallacy in an argument it is said to be
invalid. The presence of a logical fallacy in an argument does not necessarily imply anything about
the argument's premises or its conclusion. Both may actually be true, but the argument is still invalid
because the conclusion does not follow.
Post ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The second fallacy in the paper is Far–Fetched Hypothesis. This is a fallacy of inductive reasoning
that is committed when we accept a particular hypothesis when a more acceptable hypothesis, or one
more strongly based in fact, is available.
Doing my research I found that ads from newspapers, television, and magazines are notorious for
using the fallacy of Far–Fetched Hypothesis. The ad I am using for an example is
about Nite Trim. It states is a revolutionary new breakthrough in natural science allows your body to
melt off the excess weight while you sleep.–and for a limited time you can try it FREE!! Never
before has weight loss been achievable through a product so healthy, safe, and effective during
SLEEP! The combination of ALL–NATURAL, STIMULANT–FREE ingredients in NiteTrim have
made the dream of losing fat reachable. Our research and passion for helping people lose weight has
paid off for doctors and their patients for years, now it's your turn!
For the first time, natural ingredients can be as strong as pharmaceuticals...and with NiteTrim you
avoid the negative side effects, bothersome prescriptions and high prices!
The ad for Nite Trim uses Emotional Appeal and Far–Fetched Hypothesis to persuade the reader to
use the product. First they show a picture of a thin beautiful young lady in a bathing suit. The
statement from the picture is saying this product will make you look like

Should Parents Spy On Their By Judith Woods Analysis
Should parents sneak on their children's or no? This is the question that the author Judith woods
trying to find an answer for in her article "Should parents spy on their? In this article Judith woods is
discussing the fact that most of the teens and the children make a bad use of the internet. And
because of that, many parents spy on their children's texts and messages to make sure that they are
safe, and to protect them from any harm they can be exposed too in the online life like sexting,
bullying and many other things she has stated in her article. She also discussed how the online life
like twitter, face book, snap chat could affect the child's behavior. Moreover, she stated the fact that
children will create a separate online life if they caught you while you are spying on them, between
you and your child. In spite of the fact that the author throughout her article has stated many
trustworthy and convincing point and information about her argument whether parents should sneak
o, some of her arguments wer groundless and had some logical fallacies , false assumptions and
other weak evidence.
Judith woods in her article have stated many great and impressive points. firstly, when she said that
the trust between the parents and the children and then the children will be afraid to tell them
anything and will find a way to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The author also stated another logical fallacy when she wrote the words of the author Oliver james
when he said that Another logical fallacy is when she said that As this is slippery slope because she
was talking about maintaining communication and then jumped to another subject which is totally
different than the first

Comparison Between Friedrich Nietzsche And Dr. Martin...
Whether or not you agree with their views, both Friedrich Nietzsche and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
were great, highly influential men. Their views, though radically different, impacted the world in the
greatest of ways, altering history for many nations. While Nietzsche, a German philosopher from the
1800s, spoke from a materialistic point of view, believing that there is no god and that all that exists
is matter, King, a civil rights activist of the 1900s, spoke from the belief in transcendence, that there
is indeed a god, and that he exists in a divine realm outside of this universe. But not only do these
men differ in their backgrounds and religious beliefs, they differ radically in how they believe
society should function. In Nietzsche's writings, he promoted a system that emphasizes will to
power. He believed that an aristocracy was the basis for a great society. King, on the other hand,
promoted a system of equality and justice. He thought all men were created equal, and that society
should reflect that belief. The writings of these men have come to be studied by people everywhere.
They are so influential, in fact, that one of them played an incredible role in getting our society to
the point that it is today.
As stated previously, Nietzsche's work was both great and highly influential. The Nazis even used
his writings as a basis for their beliefs. Nietzsche believed that the greatest societies were always
built upon the aristocratic system. Since he believed there

Modern Technology And Its Impact On Modern Society Essay
Modern technology has undoubtedly had a profound impact on contemporary society. However,
critics of modern technology emphasize that modern technology has had deleterious effects on
young Americans. In The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans
and Jeopardizes Our Future: Or, Don 't Trust Anyone under 30, Mark Bauerlein attempts to argue
that the young Americans of contemporary society are increasingly unintelligent as a result of
modern technology, but fails to elaborate on his criteria for evaluating intelligence. Bauerlein
engages in fallacious rhetoric while presenting his argument that today's young Americans are part
of the "dumbest generation" because he fails to acknowledge the beneficial impacts that modern
technology has had on Americans. His overall argument is diminished by his usage of logical
fallacies, while arguments that do not rely on logical fallacies and rather focus on deliberate
rhetorical appeals are more cogent. Bauerlein's failure to contribute relevant evidence and his
excessive use of logical fallacies ultimately hinders his argument that modern technology has led to
the decline in youth intelligence, which is what makes counter–arguments presented by other
authors, such as Clay Shirky and Donald Norman's, much more convincing. In his book The
Dumbest Generation, Emory Professor Mark Bauerlein emphasizes his belief that most young
Americans avoid learning due to their pre–occupation with modern technology. He

Brains Not Like Ours: A Proposal on Serial Killers
Brains Not Like Ours: A Proposal on Serial Killers The mind is such a beautiful, complex, and most
times compassionate being, except for the times that it is not quite so beautiful and not quite so
compassionate. A serial killer for example has a brain just like you and I, but instead of obeying
their surroundings and having a general respect for others, these serial killers in fact kill. While most
of society may label these killers as crazy and brush off any other causes for their actions other than
their pure evilness, I feel differently. What if the part of the "average" persons brain that deals with
their feelings of anger is a little "off" in the serial killers brains. What if serial killers are "wired"
differently? Through my ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
After I am fully aware of the strategies of argument it will then be time to apply the best fit
strategies to my research in order to write a comprehensive research essay. Through my research I
have identified five sources of information. These sources include "What Would We Find Wrong in
the Brain of a Serial Killer", "The Making and Breaking of the Serial Killer", "Brain of the Intellect
vs. Brain of the Serial Killer", "A Neuroscientist Uncovers a Dark Secret", and "Psychopaths: Born
Evil or Born with a Diseased Brain". Each source provides different valuable information to my
argument. I plan to take the strengths of each article along with the main points and informative
facts to present the evidence to support the claim that serial killers brains are constructed differently
than the average human's brains. I also plan to use the example of Brian Dugan a serial killer who is
discussed in the article "Psychopaths: Born Evil or Born with a Diseased Brain". The research
articles I have chosen will help me to prove that serial killers brains are made up differently by
providing me with textual evidence.
While most do not even question the likelihood that serial killers are not plain evil, I plan to write an
informative and accurate argumentative research paper that proves to the public that those who
repeatedly commit murders have a different

Fallacies Examples
According to the text, The Power of Critical Thinking, by Louis Vaughn, a fallacy is defined as, "An
argument form that is both common and defective; a recurring mistake in reasoning (Vaughn, 561).
Fallacies can be found in many places whether it is in the media, the workplace, or around your
peers. Some fallacies contain the truth while others at a time can be false or misleading. It is
essential to be able to identify fallacies because they can be used in many ways, some good some
bad. Fallacies are used every day, whether it is to influence someone's opinion to agree with one side
of an argument rather than the other or to draw in others by appealing to their emotions or authority.
Today, I will be discussing three important fallacies and give examples of each. These fallacies
include Genetic Fallacy, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Tradition.
As stated by Vaughn, a Genetic Fallacy is "the fallacy of arguing that a claim is true or false solely
because of its abstract or nonhuman origins" (Vaughn, 561). Instead of looking into what someone is
actually implying is valid, the source gets attacked. It does not matter whether it is an organization
or a single person their reasoning is being invalidated simply because of their origin. What is being
argued is skipped and just one look is taken at the source and they are told they are wrong. For
example, in school, you were taught that five plus five equals ten but at home, you were taught that
five plus five equals twenty–five.

Summary Of Against School By John Gatto
Mandatory, enforced schooling is common all over the world, and is generally seen as a public
good, and a privilege of first world countries. However, author and teacher John Gatto argues that
mandatory schooling destroys your ability to be free thinkers and therefore should not exist, in his
piece "Against School". Despite his effective use of ethos, Gatto's argument fails to be convincing
due to logical fallacies, and a lack of evidence or first hand experience. Gatto opens his piece by
establishing his ethos. He talks about how he has taught for years, and has taught at many places. He
talks about his one–on–one experience with asking students about their boredom in school, and his
own boredom. Specifically, Gatto very purposefully uses what he says in paragraph 3 – "Often I had
to deny custom, and even bend the law, to help kids break out of this trap," to show us very that he is
invested in his students, and personally understands them. We feel that he is credible, trustworthy,
after hearing how he has interacted and connected with students all over Manhattan, and he really
must know what he's talking about. However, through the piece, several of his points lack evidence,
and has you looking warily at the rest of what he says. For instance, in paragraphs 6 and 7, Gatto
mentions several people who never were traditionally schooled as examples of why we do not need
mandatory schooling. While at first, it seems like Edison, Rockefeller, and Twain are all wonderful

Do We Really Want A President Sneezes?
Coughing Kills
On September 12, 2016 the Star–Telegram reprinted the article, "Do we really want a president who
coughs?" written by Rex Huppke, who is a columnist for the Chicago Tribune. With the upcoming
Presidential elections in November, Mr. Huppke focused his attention on the Democratic nominee,
Hilary Clinton and her recent coughing episode during a speech she gave in Ohio. He suggests that
her cough should be a major concern for voters and her health examined thoroughly to see if she is
fit enough to be the President of the United States. He sites what he calls "reliable websites" and he
quotes seemingly reputable sources that are also deeply concerned she is not. His cautionary tone in
the beginning of the article leads the reader to believe he has a serious point to get across. However,
his fictitious words, hasty generalizations, and outright lies tell a different story. He also breaks
numerous rules of fallacy throughout this satirical piece to make the point Americans are
ridiculously naïve if they rely solely on media to make significant decisions. In the beginning of his
article, Mr. Huppke asks those Americans who are of legal age to vote to consider the question, "Do
I really want a president who coughs?" (Huppke) to which he answers immediately for the reader,
no. His argument begins with a definitive perspective that answering no to this question is the only
rational answer. He goes on to say that "coughing is a sign of mental incapacity and

Get a Knife, Get a Dog but Get Rid of Guns by Molly Ivin
Molly Ivins's "Get a Knife, Get a Dog, but get Rid of Guns" is the authors personal opinion on how
guns should be banned from public use; she argues guns only kill that it would be safer to carry a
knife or get a dog to protect us. She uses the Second Amendment to back up her argument about
guns being only for the well–trained militia. The claim of the argument is Guns are a Danger, so it's
safer to get a knife or a dog. Ivins's argument is unclear without addressing the main reasons why
guns are bad overall.
Ivins's first proof of an assumption is "Let me start this discussion by pointing out that I am not
antigun. I am pro knife. Consider the merits of a knife" (323). If Ivins's is not anti– gun then why is
she making this argument? She is 'pro–knife' then she gives evidence about what the good things
about having a knife are. Her evidence that backs up why she argues that a knife is safer than a gun
is 'In the first place, you have to catch up with someone in order to stab them. A general substitution
of knives for guns would promote physical fitness. We'd turn into a whole nation of great runners.
Plus, knives don't ricochet and people are seldom killed while cleaning their knives (323).
The author states why it is a good idea to carry a knife, we would have to be physically fit with good
aim or skills if we were to carry a knife, But fighting against someone with a gun while the person
has a knife the gun wins so it wouldn't be able to protect the person. We would

Why Are Fallacies Important
Fallacies occur within our lives by strangers, friends, family and even our coworkers. Fallacies will
always be around. They will surround us throughout our entire lives. You cannot escape them;
however you can educate yourself on how to acknowledge them and learn to be aware of them.
Throughout Chapter 13 in our textbooks we are given incredible knowledge on how to detect
fallacies, how to understand them and how to deal with them. I have a coworker that never takes
responsibility for his actions. He never shows up to work on time. He is lazy and refuses to do
reports and other required work. This coworker has been with the company for a long time,
management is aware of his lack of interest, unwillingness to do his work however they continue

Fallacies In The Media Essay
Fallacies in Media
One rich source of fallacies is the media: television, radio, magazines, and the Internet. The
arguments you experience in your daily life (work, family, shopping) are another source of fallacies.
Identify three distinct informal logical fallacies you have experienced in the media or in your life.
Explain how the fallacies were used and the context in which they occurred. Then, explain what the
person presenting the fallacy should have done to ensure that he or she was not committing a logical
error. You must post to this discussion on at least four separate days of the week, and your posts
must total at least 500 words as you address this discussion. This means that, in order to receive full
credit, your first post ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In my argument I have generalized that all shelter are going to be like that but in reality it's not true
it's just that one we used. This was to use a sad story and scare tactical appeal to a play on emotions
of others not only that but appeal to pity as well.
Example 2
The other day at work one of the bosses asked who left out the tools. And of course no one said
anything. In my defense I was out on calls most of the day so I wasn't even at the shop. But because
one of the bosses is my father n law the other guys said hey Ty tell them it was you because you will
not get in trouble like we would. But in reality I would because I should know better I'm one of the
boss's son n law. But I work hard and do a good job so I took the fall for just this once I was the
scapegoat and the popular one in the group. But in this argument I would have to say that this one is
an appeal to popularity. I would not normally do this but to me it was a form of tradition for the one
ac/ guy to take the fall because I work outside of the shop. I'm not that concern of being apart of this
group but I work hard and the bosses like me so I did it. And besides I'm going to school to better
my life and those guys this job is all they have.
Premise: One of the bosses ask who left out the tools.
Premise: The other

Pity Fallacies: American Society For The Prevention Of...
Fallacies are a commonly used method one uses to persuade others. There are numerous fallacies
that one can use for several reasons; such as to distract the audience with irrelevant details or even
another argument (Appeal1). One form of a logical fallacy would be to appeal to pity. The appeal to
pity method uses feelings of sympathy or pity to help one accept an argument, distracting them from
the main facts, focusing on the sympathy matter. Appealing to pity is simply using one's emotions
against them. The appeal to pity fallacy can be found in various commercials, movies, and editorial
articles.
Commercials are the most common place to find an example of appealing to pity. Many have seen a
commercial appealing to pity, not realizing it, falling for the method. A ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) commercials the
producers use sad music and videos to make the views feel bad for the animals without a home. The
animals in the adoption centers are not always sad and hopeless, although the creators of the
commercials do not show the media that side of it. The producers want the viewers to see the
animals sad and miserable to encourage them to adopt an animal from their center. Another example
of appeal to pity commercial would be commercials advertising fundraisers for ill. The producers
create a commercial with sad music and show pictures and videos of patients that the doctors have
diagnosed with an illness or disorder to make the views sad; concluding the advertisement with a
donation subscription. In the St. Jude Children's Research Hospital's commercial they show the
media videos of the children who the

The Declaration Of Independence : Argument And Persuasion...
The Declaration of Independence was written for the purpose of separating the American colonies
from the British Empire. In context of history, The Declaration was the first step into a modern
representative democracy. In addition, the makers of the declaration, primarily Thomas Jefferson,
constructed an argument to state the problems they had with Britain and tell how the new American
government was going to deal with the problems. The argument Jefferson constructed was one made
with all the wrong evidence; however, he built the argument in such a way to rally a people for war.
The Declaration of Independence is a well–written example of argument and persuasion with its use
of structure as a whole, use of specific fallacies, and use of appeals.
Foremost, when looking at the Declaration there needs to be an understanding of who the audience
is. The most prominent person who would be reading this document would be the king himself,
King George III. When looking at the Declaration, King George would primarily be looking at the
argument Jefferson put forth. He also would be looking at the attacks and accusations being set
against him. The purpose of the Declaration, with the King for an audience, is to separate all legal
and moral ties. In the newly formed American government, Congress would be looking at what they
were setting themselves up for and placing forth the foundation of their government. Congress's
purpose for writing the Declaration was to start a government and

Ad Hominem Fallacy
There are many Fallacies of Relevance, the most common one being the Non Sequitur. The Non
Sequitur is a conclusion/claim that has its sole focus on one idea or position being held, with the
evidence having hardly any relation to support that claim/conclusion. The Ad Hominem Fallacy is a
response argument whose purpose is to avoid responsibility for something. It usually represents
itself in the form of attacking someone based on an aspect such as appearance, ethnicity, behavior...
etc. The examples provided for Ad Hominem make the fallacy clear. Guilt by association is the next
fallacy. It aligns with Ad Hominem because it is based on someone's reputation, rather than the main
situation at hand. The examples given remind me of situations that ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
due to prior judgements about that person rather than paying attention at the evidence present. I
believe this fallacy is one that can be seen a lot in courts or hearings when a family member may
testify to say, "I know my daughter could not have murdered that man. She is a gentle and nice
person. She could would feed the homeless every weekend on her free time." Tu Quoque is another
fallacy that follows the Ad Hominem Fallacy. It is also an argument that tries to avoid responsibility
by stating that others are also doing the same thing. Examples of this happening can usually be seen
with kids. After getting in trouble, a kid may state, "Mom this is not fair, the other kids were running
in the house too. Why am I the only one in trouble?" Ad Baculum are arguments that have intention
to force an agreement by threatening or intimidating with no opportunity to make a decision. Ad
Vercundiam is an argument that depends on the status, respect, or importance of a supporter of an
argument. In other words, its whole argument is dependent on someone that is seen of importance or
with

The Argument Against Women 's Combat
Debunking the Arguments Against Women in Combat There are many who would argue that
allowing women, who are physically unprepared, to fight in combat would affect the cohesiveness
and combat readiness of the units in which they serve. Government officials and military personnel
are a just a few of the leaders behind this opposing argument.
When asked about women in ground combat, President Bush summed up his position in four words,
"No women in combat" (Curl and Scarborough A01). He supported his statement further by
claiming that, "The policies currently in place that prevent women from fighting in combat have
served our nation well. There is no reason to change what is already working. Our military is
successful and will continue to be so" (ibid.). In saying this, however, he is providing an emotional
fallacy to the listener. He is appealing with Americans to keep with their traditions. Bush also,
unintentionally, gives a post hoc fallacy when he alludes to the fact that if women fought in combat,
our military wouldn't be as successful. Furthermore, he makes the assumption that if women were
allowed to fight in combat, they would negatively affect unit cohesion and male bonding, but he
gives no evidence to support his assumption.
Other opponents argue that women aren't really interested in fighting in combat, they're more
concerned with the benefits they would get as a result. Anna Simmons, a Professor of Defense
Analysis at a Naval Postgraduate School, stated this,

should everyone go to college?
Should Every Student Go to College?
Now a days there's a lot of pressure for high school graduates to further their education by attending
college. Hard evidence states that more high school graduates attend college immediately after
graduation compared to any other generation. However, college may seem more of a challenge to
some rather than others whom may "need" vocational school. Getting an education is important but
some say college isn't for everyone. In the article "What's Wrong with Vocational School?" Charles
Murray says that not every student is mentally suitable for college and vocational school would
prepare them for the vigorous academic demands that come along with college. To critically analyze
if this argument is effective ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Upon doing research on Charles Murray it was discovered that he went to Harvard, which may
make one doubt the validity of his argument. Another faulty is that a man who went to such a
prestigious school will have a different expectation than someone who went to the University of
New Hampshire for example. Of course he doesn't think college is for everyone because not
everyone may be able to make it through a college as vigorous as Harvard. Anyone that attends
Harvard has some amount of talent but "anything below an IQ of 110 is problematic...if you want to
do well [in college], you should have an IQ of 115 or higher" (Kirszner, Mandell 677). By making
this statement, one can doubt his arguments validity; he may be making too high of an expectation
for the "qualifying" student academically college abled and underestimating the "unqualified"
college student that should try two years of vocational school before attempting a four year college.
Millar, who did not attend an Ivy League school like Murray, and did an exceptionally well job of
convincing her readers by stating facts with opinions. If a woman who went to UCLA can do that,
than Murray may be overestimating college and adding more insult than encouragement. If a parent
has a child with an IQ less than that of a "qualifying" one, then Murray may appear discriminatory
towards an audience that is associated

Examples Of Straw Man Fallacy
Straw man a.The first fallacy is an example of Straw man (no latin name ). b. A Straw man fallacy is
an intentional distortion, exaggeration, or misrepresentation of another person's argument or point.
c.The character from 12 Angry Men who committed this fallacy was Number 3, also named in class
"The Father". d. Number 3 asked Number 8 "You really think he's innocent?". e. This particular
quote was a Straw man fallacy because Number 8 (the architect) never said he the defendant was
innocent.He simply voted not–guilty. Number 3 tried to misrepresent what Number 8's reason was
for voting not–guilty by asking that question therefore making Number 8 seem like the illogical
person in the group and putting everyone against him. What ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
d.Number 8 said the the 12 men ".... I just think we owe him a few words that all." Then Number 10
said " ... We heard the facts didn't we ? You're not going to tell me we're supposed to believe this kid
knowing what he is.Listen I've lived among them all my life, you can't believe a word they say, you
know that.I mean they're born liars." e. These statements were an example of Dicto Simpliciter
because Number 10 was generalizing the defendant and his people , American Puerto Ricans.Putting
them in one category and describing them as liars when that wasn't true. What he should've done
was comment on the boy's troubled juvenile life and state facts giving by the prosecution.
f.It is important to recognize a Dicto Simpliciter because in the film, it was used for stating
prejudice and stereotypical things.Much like today, statements like these puts good people in a bad
light. Like how the defendant was classified as a murder by Number 10 just because he assumed the
defendant was a delinquent mainly cause of his race.
3. Hasty Conclusions
The third fallacy was an example of Hasty Conclusions ( Dicto

Weasel Words Has Been Used At Least Since The Early 1900
Weasel words The term 'weasel words' has been used at least since the early 1900's. What are weasel
words? Weasel words are modifying words that undermine, contradict or weaken a direct message
contained in the word, phrase or clause they accompany. These commonly overused words are
ambiguous, unnecessary and should be avoided. What are some examples of weasel words?
Commonly used weasel words include: actually, apparently, really, arguably, basically, certainly,
conceivably, definitely, duly, essentially, frankly, generally, highly, simply, in essence, in fact, it
turns out that, naturally, obviously, seriously, ultimately, virtually, possibly, reportedly. Why are
weasel words so frequently used? In some cases, it is the intention of

Fallacies in a commercial Essay
'Romney Killed My Wife'
In political races in the United States logical fallacies are a staple in political ads. The 2012 election
was no exception to this convention, especially being true in an advertisement with ex–steel plant
worker Joe Soptic, speaking in Obama–affiliated Political Action Committee Priorities. The
advertisement included many logical fallacies to argue against the Romney campaign. Those include
post hoc reasoning, ad hominem, and slippery slope.
The advertisement consisted of just one man, Joe Soptic, an ex–steel plant worker, of GST Steel,
speaking against Mitt Romney. He personally points blame on Romney for the death of his wife. He
says that when "Mitt Romney and Bain closed the plant, I lost my health care, ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
In addition there was a caption in the video short after the previous statement by Soptic, claiming
that "Mitt Romney and Bain Capital made millions for themselves and then closed the plant." This is
implying that Romney and Bain Capital are greedy. This has no relation to the topic of Romney's
political views and is merely an attack on character. Furthermore the advertisement ends with Soptic
stating that he does "not think that Mitt Romney is concerned" about the well being of workers of
the plant.
The last piece of logical fallacy that is present in the advertisement of 2012 is slippery slope. This is
when it is asserted that one event will inevitably be followed another with question or argument.
Slippery slope is implied in this advertisement in the way that if Romney is in charge, he will shut
down businesses, which will disable people to receive health insurance, which will cause many
deaths. This is improbable in the way that one event does not necessarily cause the other and
predominantly, is highly unlikely.
Logical fallacies are common in the political races in the United States, whether they're in
advertisements or in a speech given by a candidate. During the presidential election of 2012, logical
fallacies seemed to be more

Fallacies And Aspects Of Cheating In The Film : Faking The...
Cheating, also known according to the film as faking the grade, is certainly unfair to honest
students. The unfairness comes in some cases where the cheater outperforms the honest student.
Faking the Grade is a film that portrays cheating as something immoral and that it puts the honest
people at a disadvantage whether it is during school/university or throughout their lives. Children
nowadays are depending on the many forms of cheating to be successful. According to Schmuley
Boteach, however, cheating is something to blame on the parents and not the children because that is
where it starts (Faking the Grade, web). In this paper I analyze arguments made in the film by
specifically focusing on the generalizations made and connecting them to the different fallacies and
principles of argumentation that relate to hasty generalizations. First, I discuss a hasty generalization
that was introduced in the film at the beginning which led for the remaining arguments of the film to
be weaker and narrowed down. Then, I discuss Boteach's argument which concludes that parents are
the main fault for kids cheating and I mention the variety of different fallacies committed in that
argument.
The generalizations made in this film are very clear. The narrator starts off the film by bringing up a
study made in Canada where half of the undergraduates admitted to cheating in university and over
three quarters admitted they cheated in high school (Faking the Grade, web). We can tell from the

Spoiled Or Mislead? The Affluenza Defense
Spoiled or Mislead? The Affluenza Defense
In January of 2015, student athlete Brock Turner sexually assaulted an intoxicated, unconscious
woman. In June of 2016, Turner was sentenced to a mere six months in prison. The reasoning of
such a short sentence being it would have a "severe impact on him, [and his father argued that] a
kid's life shouldn't be ruined...because of 20 minutes of action"(Dockterman 2). This argument is
one that is often brought up in recent culture. Teens or young adults who are convicted of crimes
such as sexual assault, driving under intoxication, or other similar types of crimes are often let off
the hook. This defense used is known as "Affluenza", or, as defined by Matt Gutman of ABC News,
the idea of being "too spoiled by [one's] parents to know right from wrong"(Gutman 2). The
"Affluenza" defense is a greatly debated one. Those who argue in favor of the affluenza defense
often make arguments along the lines of a spoiled life causing a child to not see consequences of
their actions. Along these lines, they argue that if the children don't see what their outcome may be,
and they carry out negative, harmful, illegal action, their life shouldn't be ruined based off of the one
bad decision. Those who believe in affluenza think that these young people can be steered straight,
and these moments can be used as teaching experiences. However, others do not agree in the
validity of the Affluenza defense. Those with this perspective also make the argument

When One Thinks Of The Word Ague, They Automatically Think

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Sharon Price

More from Sharon Price (17)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

When One Thinks Of The Word Ague, They Automatically Think