Active transportation can significantly improve the quality of life and improve the livability of neighborhoods especially for historically underserved and disadvantaged areas. The issues are vast, but many efforts are underway to make active transportation more inclusive. This session will look at three different efforts aimed at understanding equity barriers to bikeshare, grassroots efforts to make a disadvantaged neighborhood in outer NE Portland a safer place to walk and bike, and encourage broader participation of people with reduced physical ability and mobility.
Presenters:
Nathan McNeil, Portland State University
Timur Ender, City of Portland
Sheilagh Griffin, The Street Trust
Session Type: Case Study / Roundtable Discussion
Tags: Equity, Public Health, Safety, Promoting Active Transportation and Community Health, Designing Streets for People
1. Barriers to bike share
(and bicycling)
in underserved neighborhoods
Project Site:
http://trec.pdx.edu/research/project/884
Nathan McNeil,
Portland State University
2. Bike share and equity
• Past research tells us:
– Bike share stations are less likely to be located
nearby for people who are:
• Lower Income
• African-American or Black
– Bike share users are disproportionately:
• White or Caucasian
• Higher income
• Male
• Age 25-34
– Even when stations are placed in low-income and
minority communities, usage has been low.
2
3. Efforts to improve bike share equity
Better Bike Share
Partnership
Funded equity initiatives
for:
• Philadelphia – Indego
• Grants to 6 cities in
year one (2015-2016)
and 9 cities in year 2
(2016-2017)
3
4. 4
Element Who / What When
Bike Share owner /
operator scan
Entities planning &
operating bike share
systems
Spring 2016
Resident Surveys
Residents, whether or not
they currently bike or use
bike share
Summer 2016
Report expected
May 2017
User Surveys
Current & past bike share
users
Winter-Spring 2016-
2017
PSU Research Elements
5. Resident Survey
5
Details
18,000 residents in Brooklyn,
Chicago and Philadelphia
Low-income areas with
recent bike share stations
added
Areas with targeted outreach
Mail out survey with online
and paper options
Spanish Language option
6. Response Rates by City
6
9%
13%
12%
Chicago Philadelphia Brooklyn, New York
22. 22
Barriers: Bicycling
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
NON-WHITE &
LOWER INCOME
NON-WHITE &
HIGHER INCOME
WHITE &
LOWER INCOME
WHITE &
HIGHER INCOME
PERCENTSELECINT"BIGBARRIER"
Riding a bike could cause me to be
harassed or a victim of crime
Something could go wrong with a
bike (such as a flat tire)
I don't know how to get where I
need to go by bike
I am too out of shape to ride a bike
Biking might aggravate my personal
health issues
My friends and family wouldn't
want me to ride a bike
Riding a bike could make me a
target for police attention
Riding a bike is not viewed as a
cool activity by my friends
People might think that I can't
afford a car
3.6 2.9 2.9 2.2
Average # of big
barriers selected
23. 23
Barriers: Bike Share
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
NON-WHITE &
LOWER INCOME
NON-WHITE &
HIGHER INCOME
WHITE &
LOWER INCOME
WHITE &
HIGHER INCOME
PERCENTSELECTING"BIGBARRIER"
I worry that I'll have to pay for the
bike if anything happens to it
I don't want to use a credit card to
use bike share
I don't know enough about how to
use it
I don't have a smart phone
I worry that the [BikeShare] bikes
wouldn't adjust to fit me
I just don't want to support the
[BikeShare] program
Checking out and returning
[BikeShare] bikes is too
complicated
Signing up for [BikeShare] is too
complicated
2.5 1.8 2.0 1.4
Average # of big
barriers selected
25. So what to do?
25
What are reasons why people
would consider trying bike share?
26. Reasons to try bike share
26
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
NON-WHITE &
LOWER INCOME
NON-WHITE &
HIGHER INCOME
WHITE &
LOWER INCOME
WHITE &
HIGHER INCOME
To get exercise
For fun
To ride with friends/family
To help the environment
It's an easy way to get around
Want to try biking
Stations are near my home /
work / school
Saves me money
Saves me time
Don't need a bike of my own
Don't want to rely on transit
To get to bus or rail stops
To get to jobs more easily
To get to social services
27. Recreation
27
or Utility
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
N ON - WH I TE &
LOWER I N COM E
N ON - WH I TE &
H I GH ER I N COM E
WH I TE &
LOWER I N COM E
WH I TE &
H I GH ER I N COM E
To get exercise
For fun
To ride with friends/family
Want to try biking
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
N ON - WH I TE &
LOWER I N COM E
N ON - WH I TE &
H I GH ER I N COM E
WH I TE &
LOWER I N COM E
WH I TE &
H I GH ER I N COM E
It's an easy way to get around
Stations are near my home / work / school
Saves me money
Saves me time
Don't need a bike of my own
Don't want to rely on transit
To get to bus or rail stops
28. So what to do?
28
What sources of information are
compelling?
30. Research Team:
Research made possible by support from:
Better Bike Share Partnership
JPB Foundation
PeopleForBikes
National Institute for
Transportation and Communities
Grantee Cities around the country
30
Nathan McNeil, nmcneil@pdx.edu
Jennifer Dill, Ph.D.
John MacArthur
Joseph Broach, Ph.D.
Steven Howland
Project Site: http://trec.pdx.edu/research/project/884
Editor's Notes
Cities have begun to make more conscious efforts to place stations in low-income and minority communities, but even then the uptake among these community members has been challenges.
The Better Bike Share Partnership has funded efforts in Philadelphia and cities around the country. Large investment in Philly including stations in targeted neighborhoods, outreach, education, and system design. Grants to cities included a large variety of approaches including discounted memberships, education, outreach, and more.
Overall research project includes examining issues of bike share equity using data from a variety of sources. My presentation today will be focusing on data from the residents surveys.
Areas shaded in purple were outreach areas, and areas shaded in blue were control areas (that also had bike share stations)
Of all the survey respondents, I focus on a subset for the findings I’m presenting today – specifically people in the outreach areas (as opposed to control areas), under 65 years old, physically able to ride a bicycle, and who provided race and income information. These respondents were broken down into four groups based on race income, primarily because of the information we already know about bike share users – which is that they tend to be white and higher income.
Income level can be a dominant factor
In other cases race can be a dominate factors
Traffic safety was a top barrier for everyone, with no significant difference between groups.
Not having a safe place to leave a bicycle was a bit less likely to be cited by the white higher income group.
Personal safety emerged as a much bigger barrier for the non-white respondents.
Around 20% of non white group felt that riding a bicycle could cause them to be harassed.
Police attention – the overall number citing this was small, but considerably higher for the non white, and especially non-white lower income respondents.
Next group of barriers we looked at were around logistics, knowledge and experience
Too far away – higher for non-white respondents. Might be perception, or it might be that they are travelling further distances – unfortunately we can’t answer that with our data.
Given the perception that destinations are too far away, its not surprisingly that knowing how to get there on bike would be more of a barrier for the non-white respondents.
Fears or concerns about the journey can also be barriers.
Concerns about appearance were noted by quite a few respondents, however, there were not many differences between groups.
However, we did observe some differences on issues of image – with the non-white lower income group in particular having a few more concerns about biking being viewed as cool, and about being viewed as a symbol of not having money or being able to afford a car.
We looked at barriers that had significant differences between these race and income groups, and pulled out those that affected more than 10% of the people in one group, and less than 10% in another group. In all cases, the members of the non-white low income group faces greater barriers.
Many of these barriers were not cited as big barriers by most respdonents, however, there were many more