Bagali, MM, HR, HRD, HRM, MBA, Research, India

1. NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON REDEFINING QUALITY STANDARDS IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE
CHANGING GLOBAL SCENARIO / 16TH FEB / 2013 / BANGALORE / INDIA
Question of Faculty Assessment in
Management Education:
A Model for Faculty Accreditation
mm bagali
Professor of Management and Human Resources,
Coordinator, Research in Management,
JAIN University, India

2. Our Experience
Honored with AIMA-AMT,
Accredited Management
Teacher in Management
Sciences
The paper is based on the
experience of having such
Professional Accreditation
Award for faculty

3. Our Thinking
Surveys and Ranking are done of
B-Schools
Parameters
Infrastructure, Knowledge
delivery, Corporate interface,
Placements, Pedagogy approach
Industrial visits, Corporate guest
faculty, Soft skills training, Student
- faculty exchange, tie-up- MOU
Canteen, recreational facilities,
health care, Wi-Fi, laptops………

4. Academic Requirements
First Class
NET-SET
M.Phil / PhD
Conference attendance
Paper publication in ISBN / ISSN….
Many more
Why not Accreditation or
Contribution Assessment?

5. Accreditation ?
3 Reasons
1.Unquestionable Integrity of
Academic Excellence
2. Quality Academic contributions
with continuous improvements
3. Foreign University are come(ing),
hence match the delivery system

6. Accreditation: Paradox for Excellence
When we say Accreditation, we mean
Exceeding stated standards of quality performance
in academics and related academic activity
Production of Intellectual contributions and
Professional Development
The need for maintaining Professional Qualification
along with AQ
Upon entering at very senior leadership roles at
higher levels in academics (Dean/ Director), an
Accredited teacher on the resume will stand out
more to employer than one of questionable
integrity

7. Pause
Yes, Need for Accreditation of
Management Faculty
Assumption
Holistic Achievement and
Contributions to the Academia
by Faculty
Thus,
Confirming the ‘PAT’,
Professional Accreditation Teacher

8. A Model for Faculty Accreditation

9. Assessment Parameters
Academic
Develomment
Acade p ic Administratio
n and Intellectual
Development posmions
Ad it inistratio
n and Cotellecution
In ntrib tual
positions
Contribution
MOU/Collabora International
tion,
anOUoCollltancy
M d C/ nsuab Assignmeo t and
oration, Internati nnal Social Respon
and Consultancy Networke sibility
Assignm nt and towial Re atio
Soc ards Npon n
s sibility
Network towards Natio
n

10. Academic Development 300 points
Teaching Best Practices adopted 150
Course Development/Design 40
Case development 40
Monographs 20
Text books 30
Executive Education
20

11. Administration and positions 50 points
Responsibility held 15
Position held 10
Committees 10
Board Member 10
Support in Instituting a 5
Chair of Excellence

12. Intellectual Contribution 200 points
Research Publication 50
Projects 40
PhD guidance 25
PhD awarded 30
Advisory Board on Journals / Editor 15
Reviewer of papers 10
Patents and copyrights 20
Working papers 10

13. MOU/Collaboration, and Consultancy 100 points
Consultancy 30
Corporate network 10
Training held in academics 20
Training held for corporate 20
Industry based projects 10

14. International Assignment and Network 150 points
Visiting Assignments 30
Collaboration 20
Post-Doctoral 40
Fellowship 20
Scholarship 10
Conference / Workshops organized 30

15. Social Responsibility 100 points
Association with NGO’s/ Red Cross 20
Social impact projects 20
Work at School level 20
Economic Development Activity 20
Teach India program 20

16. Other Academic Excellence areas 100 points
Associates 15
National / State Awards
35
Certifications/ Exams 20
Membership to Professional Bodies
10
Positions in any Organization/Governing body 10
Cultural/ Sports promotion 10

17. Selection Methodology
Criteria
PhD
5 years
PG Teaching, Full Time
Management Institutes

18. Stage 1: Peer Review Process
Considering nominees' accomplishments within
Assessment parameters [The total qualifying points
501+ onwards]
or
Qualify in each area with 50% of total points
or
Qualify in each section with 50% of total points

19. Stage 2: Final Review Process
Presentation
Assigned 100
Interview
Assigned 100

20. Panels
A. Stakeholders
B. Government Organization/
Institutions
C. Research Organization/
Institutes
D. Industry Bodies
E. Overseas Representatives
F. Corporate University
G. Combination of all

21. Selection Panel
Stake holders
Management Education ….. UGC-NAAC, AICTE -NBA, and Local
affiliated University, including deemed and autonomous
The National/ State Knowledge Council/
Commission, Council for higher Education, State Innovative
Council, IIM, IIT, AIU, National Mission on Education, AIMA
Association - NASCCOM, NHRD, AIMS- Association of Indian
Management Schools, University Representatives/ CII, FCCKI,
National Skills Development Board

22. Post Accreditation Utility
1] Member of Board of Studies / Examiners
2]Member, various committees, AICTE/UGC, et al
3]Should be Eligible to…..
1 ] Grants and Research funding from University
2] Part of Board/Member - Knowledge commission or other board
3 ] Member, LIC Committee of university, any other ad-hoc committee
4 ] Corporate offerings of MDP, Consultancy, and design of training tools
and programs
5 ] Overseas Travel Grants
6] Guide Project work of MBA
4]Research committees in University
5] Guides for PhD work

23. Grading Scale and Stars
State Level STAR Category Points Final certification
State A Star Best in Class 91-100 High Honors
State A Star Excellent 80-90 A-Distension
State A Star Above Average 60-79 B- Distension
State B Star Average 40-59 A-Merit
State B Star Poor 20-39 B-Merit
State B Star Zero based 00-19 C-Merit
The consolidated points of Presentation and Interview

24. [PAT]
Professional Accreditation
Teacher, Award

25. MT, in
AI MA-A Teacher
tho r is gement hold
s
au ana nd
The
dit ed M ences, a IR area
A ccre ent Sci and
PM
is
m
Ma nage or in HR roposal
on p f
th is h 94. The rience o
19 pe n
s ince n the ex editatio ng
o r i
based such Acc r Assess Status
ng fo l
havi ication fessiona
if o t
Cert y and Pr anagemen
it M
Qual ulty of
ac
to f es.
nc
Scie
Thanks

26. Thanks