MM Bagali 2012


Published on

MBA Teachers Professor HR HRM HRD OB Leadership

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

MM Bagali 2012

  1. 1. The Question of Faculty Quality Assessment in Management Education: A Model for Faculty Accreditat ion M. M. Bagali Professor of HR and Management Jain University, Bangalore, India;
  2. 2. Our ExperienceHonored with AIMA-AMT,Accredited ManagementTeacher in ManagementSciencesFirst author ….. HR and PMIRSecond author …. MarketingThe paper is based on theexperience of having suchProfessional AccreditationAward for faculty
  3. 3. Our ThinkingSurveys and Ranking are done ofB-SchoolsParametersInfrastructure, Knowledgedelivery, Corporate interface,Placements, Pedagogy approachIndustrial visits, Corporate guestfaculty, Soft skills training, Student- faculty exchange, tie-up- MOUCanteen, recreational facilities,health care, Wi-Fi, laptops………
  4. 4. Academic RequirementsFirst ClassNET-SETM.Phil / PhDConference attendancePaper publication in ISBN / ISSN…. Many more Why not Accreditation or Contribution Assessment?
  5. 5. Accreditation ?3 Reasons1.Unquestionable Integrity of Academic Excellence2. Quality Academic contributions with continuous improvements3. Foreign University are come(ing), hence match the delivery system
  6. 6. Accreditation: Paradox for Excellence When we say Accreditation, we mean Exceeding stated standards of quality performance in academics and related academic activity Production of Intellectual contributions and Professional Development The need for maintaining Professional Qualification along with AQ Upon entering at very senior leadership roles at higher levels in academics (Dean/ Director), an Accredited teacher on the resume will stand out more to employer than one of questionable integrity
  7. 7. Pause Yes, Need for Accreditation of Management Faculty Assumption Holistic Achievement and Contributions to the Academia by Faculty Thus, Confirming the ‘PAT’,Professional Accreditation Teacher award
  8. 8. Assessment ParametersAcademicDevelopment Administratio n and Intellectual positions ContributionMOU/Collabora International tion,and Consultancy Assignment and Social Respon Network sibility towards Natio n
  9. 9. Academic Development 300 pointsTeaching Best Practices adopted 150Course Development/Design 40Case development 40Monographs 20Text books 30Executive Education 20
  10. 10. Administration and positions 50 pointsResponsibility held 15Position held 10Committees 10Board Member 10Support in Instituting a 5 Chair of Excellence
  11. 11. Intellectual Contribution 200 pointsResearch Publication 50Projects 40PhD guidance 25PhD awarded 30Advisory Board on Journals / Editor 15Reviewer of papers 10Patents and copyrights 20Working papers 10
  12. 12. MOU/Collaboration, and Consultancy 100 pointsConsultancy 30Corporate network 10Training held in academics 20Training held for corporate 20Industry based projects 10
  13. 13. International Assignment and Network 150 pointsVisiting Assignments 30Collaboration 20Post-Doctoral 40Fellowship 20Scholarship 10Conference / Workshops organized 30
  14. 14. Social Responsibility 100 pointsAssociation with NGO’s/ Red Cross 20Social impact projects 20Work at School level 20Economic Development Activity 20Teach India program 20
  15. 15. Other Academic Excellence areas 100 pointsAssociates 15National / State Awards 35Certifications/ Exams 20Membership to Professional Bodies 10Positions in any Organization/Governing body 10Cultural/ Sports promotion 10
  16. 16. Selection MethodologyCriteria PhD 5 years PG Teaching, Full Time Management Institutes
  17. 17. Stage 1: Peer Review Process Considering nominees accomplishments within Assessment parameters [The total qualifying points 501+ onwards] or Qualify in each area with 50% of total points or Qualify in each section with 50% of total points
  18. 18. Stage 2: Final Review ProcessPresentation Assigned 100Interview Assigned 100
  19. 19. PanelsA. StakeholdersB. Government Organization/ InstitutionsC. Research Organization/ InstitutesD. Industry BodiesE. Overseas RepresentativesF. Corporate UniversityG. Combination of all
  20. 20. Selection PanelStake holders Management Education ….. UGC-NAAC, AICTE -NBA, and Local affiliated University, including deemed and autonomous The National/ State Knowledge Council/ Commission, Council for higher Education, State Innovative Council, IIM, IIT, AIU, National Mission on Education, AIMA Association - NASCCOM, NHRD, AIMS- Association of Indian Management Schools, University Representatives/ CII, FCCKI, National Skills Development Board
  21. 21. Post Accreditation Utility1] Member of Board of Studies / Examiners2]Member, various committees, AICTE/UGC, et al3]Should be Eligible to….. 1 ] Grants and Research funding from University 2] Part of Board/Member - Knowledge commission or other board 3 ] Member, LIC Committee of university, any other ad-hoc committee 4 ] Corporate offerings of MDP, Consultancy, and design of training tools and programs 5 ] Overseas Travel Grants 6] Guide Project work of MBA4]Research committees in University
  22. 22. Grading Scale and StarsState Level STAR Category Points Final certificationState A Star Best in Class 91-100 High HonorsState A Star Excellent 80-90 A-DistensionState A Star Above Average 60-79 B- DistensionState B Star Average 40-59 A-MeritState B Star Poor 20-39 B-MeritState B Star Zero based 00-19 C-Merit The consolidated points of Presentation and Interview
  23. 23. [PAT]Professional Accreditation Teacher, Award
  24. 24. For complete Assessment details and administration, fell free to get connected: M. M. Bagali Thanks
  25. 25. For all Management Professionals Can we all call yourself for IMS-Indian Management Service [A service for Students Future] M. M. Bagali