1. Australian Institute of Health & Safety (AIHS) – Adelaide Symposium
Psychosocial risk management
Jason Mavrikis - Education & Engagement Advisor
SafeWork SA – Education Team
2. Acknowledgment of country
We acknowledge and respect Aboriginal peoples as the state's first peoples and nations and
recognise them as traditional owners and occupants of land and waters in South Australia.
Further, we acknowledge that the spiritual, social, cultural and economic practices of
Aboriginal peoples come from their traditional lands and waters, that they maintain their
cultural and heritage beliefs, languages and laws which are of ongoing importance, and that
they have made and continue to make a unique and irreplaceable contribution to the state.
3. SafeWork SA’s Mission:
Making South Australian workplaces safe
Provide advice
and education on
work health and
safety
Issue licences
and registration
for workers and
plant
Investigate
workplace
incidents
Enforce the
Work Health and
Safety Laws in
South Australia
SafeWork SA is South Australia's workplace health and safety regulator
4. In May 2021, Australia’s WHS ministers agreed to amend the
model WHS Regulations to prescribe control measures for psychological risks
In April 2022, SafeWork Australia released an update to the model WHS regulations,
which now define psychosocial hazards, psychosocial risk, and provide a list of
matters that must be considered when implementing control measures
In July 2022, SafeWork Australia released the model Code of Practice for Managing
Psychosocial Hazards at Work
The psychosocial regulations will come into effect in SA on 25 December 2023.
An Approved Code of Practice is not forthcoming – the model code is available.
Setting the scene…Why is this relevant to me?
5. A quick recap of the WHS Framework
5
WHS Act
WHS Regulations
SA Approved Codes of Practice
- National Codes of Practice
Australian Standards
Guidance materials / information sheets etc.
= Work Health and Safety (Psychosocial Risks) Amendment
Regulations 2023
Examples of SWSA
guidance:
• Psych Health for Small
Business
• Psychosocial risk
assessment tool
• How to examine and
interrogate data
• Focus Group guide
Model Codes of Practice are practical guides to
achieving the standards of health and safety
required under the model WHS Act and
Regulations.
To have legal effect in a jurisdiction, a model
Code of Practice must be approved as a code
of practice there.
6. Who has duties?
Duty of Person Conducting a Business or Undertaking
Manage risk to workers Manage risk to other persons
Duty of Workers
Take reasonable care with
respect to their own health
and safety
Take reasonable care with
respect to the health and
safety of others
Follow the reasonable directions
of the persons conducting the
business or undertaking
Under the Work Health
and Safety (Industrial
Manslaughter)
Amendment Bill,
individuals can face a
maximum penalty of
20 years
imprisonment, and $18
million for companies,
if they are reckless or
grossly negligent in
conduct which
breaches a work
health and safety duty
and results in the
death of another
person.
8. Plant at a
workplace
Workplace
interactions
and
behaviours
Work
environment
Psychosocial hazards arising
from or relating to:
Design or
management
of work
Stress
response
When frequent, prolonged or
severe
Psychological
harm
• Depression
• Anxiety
• Burnout
• Post traumatic stress
disorder
Physical harm
• Cardiovascular disorders
• Musculoskeletal disorders
Figure 1. Model of work-related stress
9. Psychosocial hazards
Hazard
Poor workplace relationships
Work pressure – high or low, work patterns
Poor support and job control
Poor organisational justice and change mgmt
Low role clarity
Inadequate recognition and reward
Poor environment conditions
Harmful workplace behaviours
Remote / isolated work and fatigue
Violent or traumatic events
Potential harm
Depression, anxiety, MSDs,
cardiovascular ill-health
Absenteeism, presenteeism
10. Four steps to prevention - overview of the
process to manage psychosocial risks
Manage workplace risks to psychological
health as you would for physical health
and safety
Step 1: Identify the hazards
Step 2: Assess the risks
Step 3: Control the risks
Step 4: Review
Do this in consultation with workers
Image from Model Code of Practice Managing Psychosocial
Hazards at Work 2022
12. Workplace bullying is the symptom of
organisational dysfunction not the disease to
be treated
Bullying arises primarily from ‘stress’ in the
organisational system
Bullying is underpinned by power dynamics
Individual factors play a role, but are not the
major contributors
12
Workplace bullying - A systems issue
Tuckey, M.R., Li, Y. Chen, P.Y., Dollard, M.F., McLinton, S., Rogers, A.,
& Neall, A.M. (2015). Prevention of workplace bullying through risk
assessment: Final project report. Adelaide, Australia: Asia Pacific Centre
for Work Health and Safety. DOI: 10.4225/50/5759F7C5354D5. Retrieved
from: http://apo.org.au/node/64434
Prevention of workplace bullying through risk assessment – Tuckey et al.
14. Small group activity
• Each group has a different image of a workplace in a
specific industry or an occupation.
• Based on your experience and knowledge of that
industry or occupation, discuss any psychosocial
hazards that MAY be present in that workplace.
• Referring to the hierarchy of controls, discuss the
types of psychosocial risk control measures that you
would implement in this workplace.
• List the top 3 psychosocial hazards you have
identified in that industry and what you’re going to do
to control the corresponding risk
17. Example scenario – Medium size construction company
Scenario
• Several projects on the go,
with backlog of work
• Manager responsible for
contractors, apprentices,
ensuring supplies/equipment
are delivered to sites
• An electrical sub-contractor
is engaged for all sites. The
manager aware an
electrician has been verbally
aggressive with 1st year
apprentice. He tells
apprentice this is the
industry, no time to deal with
this and to toughen up
• Apprentice making mistakes,
afraid to ask for help and
wants aggression to stop
17
Psychosocial hazards
• Poor emotional and
practical supervisor and
manager support – manager
does not acknowledge and
address apprentice
concerns
• Occupational violence and
poor workplace
relationships – verbal
aggressions by the
electrician
• Low job control – the
apprentice has little say in
his work
• Role overload demands –
the manager and workers
experience a high workload
with competing demands
Psychosocial controls
The business owner:
• Meets with electrical subcontractor
to develop behaviour standards
• Informs workers aggressive
behaviour can be reported directly to
him
• Speaks with apprentice to check in
on wellbeing, offer support services
• Reviews supervision and support of
apprentices
• Reduces demands on manager by
providing assistance with managing
contracts and tenders
The manager:
• Starts daily toolbox talks
• Sets time aside each week to
understand 1st year apprentice
needs, assigns 3rd year buddy
18. 18
Overview of the psychosocial risk management process
Step 1 - Identify the organisational, and environmental, psychosocial hazards via:
Interrogation of workplace data, direct observation (e.g., respectful communication amongst
workers, conflict and signs of distress), workplace safe systems of work (e.g., policies and
procedures developed in consultation with workers, training on respectful behaviour, and
reporting mechanisms)
Step 2 - Assess and prioritise risk – consider the duties/task elements, consequences
(possible injury outcomes), injury risk potential (likelihood x consequences) and action
required
Step 3 - Establish a psychosocial risk management plan that considers risk priority, risk
factors to be considered, cause, existing controls, additional controls to be implemented,
person responsible, review date, and sign off upon completion
Step 4 - Review the effectiveness of the controls by establishing an implementation plan that
considers existing control measures in place, are the control eliminating or minimising risk to
an acceptable residual risk level(?), remaining risk needing further attention, and evidence of
consultations with key stakeholders (e.g., workers and other persons).
Consult throughout!!!
19. Psychological health for small business (SafeWork SA)
– Provides practical suggestions on the ‘do(s)’ and ‘don’t(s)’ on ‘how’ to control the risks associated with
each organisation’s psychological hazard.
Psychosocial risk assessment tool – (SafeWork SA)
– This risk assessment tool is designed to help employers meet their legal obligations to manage risks
associated with psychological injury
How to examine and interrogate workplace data – (SafeWork SA)
– Data can help to identify and assess potential psychosocial hazards. Sources of data can vary
depending on the size of your organisation. The data source table below will help you identify some that
may be available to your organisation.
Focus group guide
– Focus groups can help you identify and analyse emerging psychosocial hazards and inform future
planning identified in the risk assessment process. They’re ideal for consulting with workers and enable
the collection of meaningful data on people’s perceptions of their work environment.
People at Work psychosocial risk assessment tool (state/territory WHS regulators)
– A validated survey-based measurement tool that aims to help organisations identify and manage
psychosocial risk.
19
Psychological health – tools and resources
20. Safe Work Australia - guidance
• SWA Model Code of Practice Managing Psychosocial Hazards at Work (July 2022)
• SWA Infographic: Managing Psychosocial Hazards at Work
• SWA Infographic: What psychosocial hazards sound like
• Guidance material on specific hazards includes…
– Guide for preventing and responding to workplace bullying & worker’s guide (2016)
– Preventing workplace sexual harassment guide (Jan, 2021)
– Preventing workplace violence and aggression guide (Jan, 2021)
• Information sheet Family and domestic violence at the workplace
21. Treat psychosocial risks, including s-xual harassment,
like any other WHS risk
Review your existing WHS systems
Consult, consult and consult some more!
Maintain up-to-date knowledge
Ask questions about culture
Be proactive
Officers must engage
Review your HR framework
Think outside of the box
Do not ‘set and forget’
What should organisations do now?...
22. Contact Us
1300 365 255
www.safework.sa.gov.awww.safework.sa.gov.au/freeadvice
Questions?
Editor's Notes
SafeWork SA | Strategic Plan 2023 – 2027 Our Vision
SafeWork SA website: About us: We are South Australia's workplace health and safety regulator.
What industries so they work in ?
Have they any contact with WHS Inspectors ?
(Have they been involved in a workplace incident ?)
Jason
Jason
‘Mental health’ – is a positive concept related to the social and emotional wellbeing of individuals and communities. The concept is influenced by culture, but generally relates to the enjoyment of life, ability to cope with stress and sadness, the fulfilment of goals and potential, and a sense of connection to others.
‘Mental ill-health’ – is a broad term that encompasses both mental illness and mental problems. A mental illness is a disorder diagnosed by a medical professional that significantly interferes with an individuals cognitive, emotional and social abilities.
‘Psychosocial’ – broadly, the term psychosocial refers to the interrelationships between an individual’s thoughts and behaviours, and their social environment. In the context of WHS, we consider the workplace, a worker’s team, and the organisational culture as the primary social environments. In literature outside of the WHS field, the term often refers to social environments such as family of origin, socioeconomic status and level of education.
‘Psychological’ – Psychology is the scientific study of the mind and behaviour, including feelings and thoughts. In its oldest meaning, the word psychology derives from the Greek word psyche, meaning spirit or soul. The latter part of the word "psychology" derives from -λογία -logia, which refers to "study" or "research" = taken together, psychology means ‘the study of the soul’.
Psychosocial hazards rarely exist in isolation and are often interrelated
For example, when a high workload, or excessive job demands, is combined with high autonomy and high supervisor support, this combination can lead to ‘flourishing’, a state of positive mental health, which means that the worker is potentially in the flow state, enjoying their work, and performing well.
Conversely, if we took high workload, or excessive job demands, and combined it with workplace incivility, and low autonomy, that may lead to burnout.
So, if we take that one psychosocial hazard, high workload, and combine it with other factors, it can lead to either damaging work-related stress, or eustress, ultimately becoming either a positive or negative influence on a worker’s psychological health and wellbeing.
Four steps to prevention
A systematic approach to risk management should examine the impact of the community, the organisation, systems within the organisation and individual factors, to build the organisation’s risk profile.
This involves looking at the context and systems of the organisation (e.g. male-dominated workforces, hierarchical structures) as well as the characteristics of the job (e.g. access to weapons and drugs, exposure to death and violence). The management of risks to physical and mental health and safety is a requirement of work health and safety legislation.
For police and emergency services organisations, a risk management strategy should have a broad focus that includes actions to reduce stigma, develop management capability, monitor exposure to trauma, and build a strengths-based culture.
Convictions were recorded against two employees, Jeffrey Rowe and Luke Chenoweth, and their employer, Tad-Mar Electrical Pty Ltd, in respect to the bullying of a 19 year old apprentice. Rowe and Chenoweth pleaded guilty to charges that they had engaged in conduct that exposed an individual to a risk of death or serious injury or illness, and that they were reckless as to that risk.
The details of the bullying was particularly egregious. During a lunch break, Chenoweth squirted a flammable liquid onto the boot and shirt of the apprentice, Austin Courtney, and ignited the flammable liquid. Rowe, the site supervisor, took no steps to stop Chenoweth, and himself squirted more flammable liquid onto Courtney’s shirt while the shirt was burning. The court noted that both the acts and the omissions of Rowe were serious. Fortunately Courtney was not seriously injured.
Summary
This case serves as an important reminder that health and safety laws extend beyond the actions that someone takes, and also include an obligation to ensure that a lack of action does not adversely affect the health and safety of other persons.
Bullying should be treated as any other workplace risk, and measures should be put in place to eliminate the risk, to ensure bullying does not occur in the workplace. In addition, all workers should be trained to ensure they know how and when to intervene if it does.
The PCBU (Tad-Mar Electrical), had a duty to ensure, as far as was reasonably practicable, the health and safety of its workers. In this case it failed to adequately train and supervise its site supervisors involved in the incident and it failed to ensure that it possessed and made known to all of its workers a documented bullying and harassment policy.
The convictions of Rowe and Chenoweth mark the first successful Category 1 prosecutions in South Australia, and it is believed to be the first successful bullying prosecutions under the harmonised Work Health and Safety legislation, nationally. This is a significant decision for employers and employees because it is the first time s 31 (reckless indifference towards health and safety) has been used to prosecute individuals in relation to bullying behaviour.
Possible bullying related control measures:
Policy/code of conduct/principles of good behaviour
Procedurally fair process for the investigation of allegations relating to inappropriate workplace behaviour(s) – developed in consultation with workers
Relevant training, professional development opportunities and other systems of support for people managers and workers
Senior management ‘walking the talk’, setting the organisational ‘tone’ and positively influencing workplace culture
Jason to introduce and form the groups
Jason to introduce - Mardi and Amanda to help groups
Identifying psychosocial hazards and implementing risk control measures
Small group ACTIVITY:
One of the things that can make responding to psychosocial hazards or risks more challenging is that they are not as ‘visible’ as some physical hazards.
In a moment we will move into small groups.
Each group will be given an image of a workplace in a specific industry or an occupation.
Based on your experience and knowledge of that industry or occupation, discuss any psychosocial hazards that MAY be present in that workplace.
Referring to the hierarchy of controls, discuss the types of psychosocial risk control measures that you would implement in this workplace.
Please see the attached psychosocial hierarchy of controls that we would use to assist with this activity.
Jason:
Psychosocial Hazard Management – Controlling Risks
We know that exposure to psychosocial hazards and other risk factors increases the likelihood of unwanted mental health and physical health outcomes. Employees may be exposed to multiple psychosocial hazards and other risk factors, and these can interact. It is important to design work to control psychosocial hazards and risks using the hierarchy of controls.
The following are examples that may help you to understand how to apply the hierarchy of controls to psychosocial hazards and risks, so far as is reasonably practicable:
Eliminate after-hours or night work (high job demands, fatigue), eliminate driving at night (high job demands, fatigue), eliminate solo shifts (isolated work, stress).
Reducing the risk so far as is reasonably practicable may include designing jobs with safe workloads and scheduling (high job demands, fatigue, stress) or redesigning jobs to improve role clarity around job requirements and work timelines.
Modelling and promotion of positive interpersonal interactions, fairness, acknowledgement of achievements, and no tolerance for unreasonable behaviours from any person in the organisation, including leaders, supervisors and employees (poor workplace relationships, poor support, poor organisational justice, poor recognition and rewards, bullying, stress, gendered violence).
Allow employees to have job control as far as reasonably possible (stress).
Timely consultation and take into account the views of the workers around any changes impacting on employees (poor change management, stress).
Design to reduce exposure to environmental stressors, for example, lighting, vibration, temperature and noise (poor job demands, poor environmental conditions, stress, fatigue). Implement workplace design features, for example, physical barriers, visibility and secure staff areas (poor environmental conditions, occupational violence).
Administrative controls may include training for resilience, employee assistance program (EAP), health promotion, codes of conduct, policies and procedures (poor workplace relationships, poor change management, poor support, traumatic events, fatigue, stress, bullying, occupational violence, gendered violence).
Use of relevant personal protective equipment (PPE) for jobs with high risk of occupational violence.
Jason:
Psychosocial Hazard Management – Controlling Risks
We know that exposure to psychosocial hazards and other risk factors increases the likelihood of unwanted mental health and physical health outcomes. Employees may be exposed to multiple psychosocial hazards and other risk factors, and these can interact. It is important to design work to control psychosocial hazards and risks using the hierarchy of controls.
The following are examples that may help you to understand how to apply the hierarchy of controls to psychosocial hazards and risks, so far as is reasonably practicable:
Eliminate after-hours or night work (high job demands, fatigue), eliminate driving at night (high job demands, fatigue), eliminate solo shifts (isolated work, stress).
Reducing the risk so far as is reasonably practicable may include designing jobs with safe workloads and scheduling (high job demands, fatigue, stress) or redesigning jobs to improve role clarity around job requirements and work timelines.
Modelling and promotion of positive interpersonal interactions, fairness, acknowledgement of achievements, and no tolerance for unreasonable behaviours from any person in the organisation, including leaders, supervisors and employees (poor workplace relationships, poor support, poor organisational justice, poor recognition and rewards, bullying, stress, gendered violence).
Allow employees to have job control as far as reasonably possible (stress).
Timely consultation and take into account the views of the workers around any changes impacting on employees (poor change management, stress).
Design to reduce exposure to environmental stressors, for example, lighting, vibration, temperature and noise (poor job demands, poor environmental conditions, stress, fatigue). Implement workplace design features, for example, physical barriers, visibility and secure staff areas (poor environmental conditions, occupational violence).
Administrative controls may include training for resilience, employee assistance program (EAP), health promotion, codes of conduct, policies and procedures (poor workplace relationships, poor change management, poor support, traumatic events, fatigue, stress, bullying, occupational violence, gendered violence).
Use of relevant personal protective equipment (PPE) for jobs with high risk of occupational violence.
Jason
A medium-sized residential construction company is currently managing several projects, some are not on schedule, and there is a backlog of work.
The manager is responsible for organising the contractors, apprentices, ensuring supplies and equipment are delivered to different sites.
An electrical subcontractor is engaged for all the sites, and the building manager is aware that one of the electricians has been verbally aggressive with a first-year apprentice engaged by the construction business. He tells the apprentice that this is how the industry is, that he does not have time to deal with this and that he needs to toughen up and get on with his work.
The apprentice just wants to learn but makes regular mistakes and is afraid to ask for help. He wants verbal aggression to stop.
Psychosocial hazards and risks
Poor emotional and practical supervisor and manager support: The manager does not acknowledge the apprentice’s concerns or have the time to manage the training of apprentices.
Occupational violence and poor workplace relationships: Verbal aggression by the electrician, which could escalate to physical aggression if not stopped, is also having a negative impact on the apprentice’s ability to focus on his work. This is also stopping him from asking for help when he needs it.
Low job control: the apprentice has little say in his work.
Role overload demands: the manager and workers experience a high workload with competing deadlines.
Psychosocial controls
The business owner, after consulting the manager and workers to address poor workplace relationships, support and role overload:
meets with the electrical subcontractor to develop behaviour standards for all their workers when undertaking work at the same sites and processes for addressing safety concerns, including violence and aggression
informs workers that aggressive behaviour can be reported to him directly
speaks with the apprentice to check on his wellbeing and provide information about psychological support services
reviews the supervision and support of apprentices
decides to reduce the demands on the manager by providing assistance with managing contracts and tenders.
The manager, to improve support and job control:
starts daily toolbox talks with all workers, including contractors, to provide relevant information and instructions
sets time aside each week to understand the first-year apprentice’s learning requirements, assess his progress, develop learning goals, gets the supervisor to give him responsibility for some tasks he should be competent to do, and allocates a third-year apprentice to buddy the first-year apprentice to support him on various tasks.
There are also Review and Improve Column – which I haven’t included due to space – check out NSW Code to have a look at these