Please help. thanks, Many government agencies and other organizations display warning and consent banners to users logging onto the network. A sample consent banner is shown below. Based on a user’s acceptance of the banner, should the government be authorized to monitor network communications? To search and seize data contained on the information system? Should the government be required to obtain consent, a subpoena or search warrant to search the data? Is it foreseeable that the government could intercept or search a user’s personal data such as personal email or web browsing activity and should that be authorized? Discuss these questions thoroughly in your Conference response, and respond to at least one other student’s original post in a way that adds to the discussion. Sample banner: By using this Information System (IS) (which includes any device attached to this IS), you consent to the following conditions: The U.S. Government (USG) routinely intercepts and monitors communications on this IS for purposes including, but not limited to, penetration testing, Communications Security (COMSEC) monitoring, network operations and defense, personnel misconduct (PM), law enforcement (LE), and counterintelligence (CI) investigations. At any time, the USG may inspect and seize data stored on this IS. Communications using, or data stored on, this IS are not private, are subject to routine monitoring, interception, and search, and may be disclosed or used for any USG-authorized purpose. This IS includes security measures (e.g., authentication and access controls) to protect USG interests--not for your personal benefit or privacy. Notwithstanding the above, using this IS does not constitute consent to PM, LE or CI investigative searching or monitoring of the content of privileged communications, or work product, related to personal representation or services by attorneys, psychotherapists, or clergy, and their assistants. Such communications and work product are private and confidential. See User Agreement for details. Solution Answer: if various government agencies and the other organization displaying warning and if the user accept the warning banner then i think yes, the government is authorized to monitor the network communications. Government has all the rights, because government has already displayed you the warning, and if after seeing warning message if you are accepting it, then you are giving approval. Regarding searching data or even seizing data on information system, government should obtain the legal warrant, without that government should not be allowed to seized or even search data on any information systems. Without taking the user\'s permission or user\'s approval, no one should be authorized to access user\'s data such as email, address, browsing activities. .

1. Please help. thanks, Many government agencies and other organizations display warning and
consent banners to users logging onto the network. A sample consent banner is shown below.
Based on a user’s acceptance of the banner, should the government be authorized to monitor
network communications? To search and seize data contained on the information system? Should
the government be required to obtain consent, a subpoena or search warrant to search the data? Is
it foreseeable that the government could intercept or search a user’s personal data such as
personal email or web browsing activity and should that be authorized? Discuss these questions
thoroughly in your Conference response, and respond to at least one other student’s original
post in a way that adds to the discussion.
Sample banner:
By using this Information System (IS) (which includes any device attached to this IS), you
consent to the following conditions:
The U.S. Government (USG) routinely intercepts and monitors communications on this IS for
purposes including, but not limited to, penetration testing, Communications Security (COMSEC)
monitoring, network operations and defense, personnel misconduct (PM), law enforcement (LE),
and counterintelligence (CI) investigations.
At any time, the USG may inspect and seize data stored on this IS.
Communications using, or data stored on, this IS are not private, are subject to routine
monitoring, interception, and search, and may be disclosed or used for any USG-authorized
purpose.
This IS includes security measures (e.g., authentication and access controls) to protect USG
interests--not for your personal benefit or privacy.
Notwithstanding the above, using this IS does not constitute consent to PM, LE or CI
investigative searching or monitoring of the content of privileged communications, or work
product, related to personal representation or services by attorneys, psychotherapists, or clergy,
and their assistants. Such communications and work product are private and confidential. See
User Agreement for details.
Solution

2. Answer:
if various government agencies and the other organization displaying warning and if the user
accept the warning banner then i think yes, the government is authorized to monitor the network
communications. Government has all the rights, because government has already displayed you
the warning, and if after seeing warning message if you are accepting it, then you are giving
approval.
Regarding searching data or even seizing data on information system, government should obtain
the legal warrant, without that government should not be allowed to seized or even search data
on any information systems.
Without taking the user's permission or user's approval, no one should be authorized to access
user's data such as email, address, browsing activities.