1. Creative Inclusion Workshop
Potential Collaborative Cultural & Creative Sector
Bids for BIG Lottery Social Inclusion funding
via the EU Programme (North East LEP)
4. Reminder: the opportunity for
Creative Inclusion
BIG Lottery Opt-in Route
Offers 100% grant funding to a (fairly)
fixed partnership
Targeted at ‘multiple barriers to
employment’ – the most
disadvantaged: NEETs, Long-term
unemployed, (ex)offenders, some BME
groups, over 50s,disabled people
“additional and innovative approaches
to pre-employment training”
“Outcomes must include progression
towards economic activity”
Small number of targeted calls for large
(£2-4m) projects
6. Latest position (?)
Likely to be geographic and
thematic targeting
2 themes:
multiple barriers to work
health inequalities
Financial and digital inclusion
woven through both of these?
Geography = Durham, Tyne &
Wear (possibly in 2 parts),
Northumberland?
7. VONNE Recommendations on
Health Inequalities
BLF supports calls for two health inequality projects
Supporting and promoting healthy lifestyles – Fit for work activities
diet / exercise / smoking / alcohol / motivation / activity and support –
Participation and referral to job support
(ESF eligibility query over exercise)
Support for people with mental health issues to progress towards
economic activity
Condition management, motivation, confidence building, support with
progression and some in work support. This must align with and add value to
other DWP provision. It should also include in work support and retention.
BLF should specify examples of a range of activity that is eligible and what is
specifically ineligible, but should keep the call specification flexible so that
partnerships can develop locally responsive initiatives.
Support for over 50s, people with physical disabilities and people with addictions
form priorities under the multiple barriers to employment strand of themed
activity.
8. 3 programmes of activity targeted on those furthest away
from the labour market – with progression onto Work
Programme as an outcome and with cross referral to other
SI programmes (i.e. people with debt refer to the financial
inclusion programme)
Support to families with chaotic lifestyles and individuals
with severe and multiple disadvantage
Support for over 50s , people with long term conditions
and people with physical disabilities.
Support to people with Learning Disability
People with protected characteristics must be served by the
above projects.
VONNE Recommendations on
Multiple Barriers to employment
9. My thoughts (only guesses)
Cultural organisations will have options to bid
for ‘Multiple Barriers’ work and/or ‘Health
Inequalities’ work in their patch
Could bid as part of wider partnerships in
each patch OR as the cultural sector in that
patch if can reach “critical mass” of £2-3m
(unlikely?)
If seeking to be part of a partnership, there
are likely to be several courtiers
Can be included in more than one proposal
11. Volunteering in
cultural & creative
activities and events
as a way of
developing
confidence and skills.
The Offer from the Sector
Cultural/creative
classes as a way of
overcoming isolation
for excluded groups
e.g.
• The elderly
• People with
learning
disabilities
Participation in
cultural/creative
activity as a way of
tackling health
problems – especially
mental health
Culture & creativity
as a way of
developing the skills
and enthusiasm of
young people.
Possibly leading to
further education,
training or
employment in the
sector.
Creative
Inclusion
12. The Offer from the Sector
1. Culture & creativity as a route to engage, develop and move on young
people post 16
2. Volunteering on cultural & creative activities and events as a route for
disadvantaged people to gain confidence and skills
3. Culture & creative classes to help overcome isolation and build confidence
for excluded adults, where this leads towards economic activity
4. Participation in cultural/creative activity as a route to better (mental)
health, as part of progression towards economic activity
13. Proven track record of working with
‘hard to reach’ groups
Proven impact on participation, well-
being, confidence
Variety of ways into, through and
out of the sector
Scale of activity – 1,000s of
beneficiaries (how many eligible?)
Diverse size, sector, location
Interesting routes to digital inclusion
Most organisations have some
experience of ESF
The Offer from the Sector
Harnessing people’s enthusiasm for what they enjoy
16. My thoughts (only guesses)
Cultural organisations will have options to bid
for ‘Multiple Barriers’ work and/or ‘Health
Inequalities’ work in their patch
Could bid as part of wider partnerships in
each patch OR as the cultural sector in that
patch if can reach “critical mass” of £2-3m
(unlikely?)
If seeking to be part of a partnership, there
are likely to be several courtiers
Can be included in more than one proposal
19. Next steps
Write up results to date
Get some clarity on the call
Decide whether to co-ordinate
across the sector, if so, how?
Woo partners
Bid
Win
Deliver
Editor's Notes
Talk about the role of Cultural Organisations in addressing poverty and social exclusion.
Lots of guff and waffle about this, but essentially it is about getting people into work. Maybe in the sector, maybe self employed, maybe employed elsewhere using skills gained in the sector. But working.
Our timelines are guided by the progress of the MA, and also local negotiations with LEPs. We want to ensure we move at the right speed for LEPs and applicants using learning from previous awards as to the importance of planning time, whilst avoiding the temptation to rush project delivery. Our timescales therefore are;
Development Phase From October 2014 – March 2015- Almost £630k of lottery money, through the Programme Development Fund, has been given to local areas to help them make the most of the joint Big Lottery and ESF funding which will. The PDF money will - Ensure widespread awareness of the ESF opportunities and requirements - Provide administrative support - Provide a publically advertised contact for local organisations
Application Phase – We will be submitting funding applications to the MA as early as we can in 2015. These will give detail of the LEP proposed activity and will allow us to begin more formal planning, with LEP’s. Our proposal is to launch calls in two tranches; we will agree with LEPs which tranche is most appropriate for which project. Assuming the Operational Programme is signed off late 2014/early 2015, we are currently planning for tranche one to launch in June 2015 and close to stage one applications in September 2015. As we expect projects in the second tranche to be more complex and potentially take longer to develop, we will close to stage one applications for tranche two projects in December 2015. The second stage allows flexibility to allow faster awards to projects which are relatively small and straightforward or where we know applicants will be well-prepared and able to move quickly.
Delivery Phase - We then go into the delivery phase, in early 2016, for the full programme activity to begin.