A presentation delivered by Luke Mosely (Adelaide University) to the Soil Science Australia Workshop on salinity, sodicity and soil management under irrigated horticulture on the 19 Sept 2019 at Robinvale, Victoria.
7. University of Adelaide 7
“Exchangeable” cations is an operational definition
based on soil extraction using an electrolyte solution of
given composition and pH but consensus is that it
includes diffuse ion swarm and outersphere complexes
(ie. not specifically absorbed inner sphere complexes)
Inner Sphere Complex
Diffuse ion
Outer
Sphere
Complex
Organic
Matter
8. University of Adelaide 8
Mineral structure and surface complexes (incl.
organic matter) establish a charge, ions in diffuse ion
swarm (i.e. corresponding to bulk soil electrolyte
composition) are attracted to oppositely charged
surface which screens the charge at that surface
Na+
Na+
Ca2+
Na+
Ca2+
Na+
Na+
Ca2+
K+
9. University of Adelaide 9
Higher ionic strength or higher charge cations (divalent
cf. monovalent) compresses electrical double layer,
particles can approach closely, van der Waals and other
attractive forces come into effect and allow aggregation
Na+
Na+
Ca2+
Na+
Ca2+
Na+
Na+
Ca2+ K+
Ca2+
10. University of Adelaide 10
From Mosley et al. 2003
(Environmental Science & Technology
37, 3303-3308)
11. University of Adelaide 11
From Mosley et al. 2003
(Environmental Science & Technology
37, 3303-3308)
From Ebeling et al. 2011
(Nanotechnology 22, 305706)
Sodicity
15. 15
University of Adelaide 15
Drainage only resulted in increased soil salinisation, all
treatments receiving 3 irrigations had markedly
reduced salinity
Results – Soil Salinity
16. University of Adelaide 16
Gypsum & limestone application (plus irrigation)
decreased exchangeable Na relative to control but
effects were not significantly different than for irrigation
only
Results – Exchangeable Sodium
17. 17
University of Adelaide 17
Gypsum & limestone application (plus irrigation)
increased exchangeable Ca relative to control but
effects were not significantly greater than for
irrigation only
Results – Exchangeable Calcium
18. University of Adelaide 18
Free download on University of
Adelaide Press website:
https://www.adelaide.edu.au/pre
ss/titles/murray-soils/
20. University of Adelaide 20
• Saline-sodic soils can be successfully
recovered in the LMRIA
• Irrigation water with low SAR and sufficient
dissolved Ca can recover soils without
adding gypsum (particularly useful in heavy
clays)
• Irrigation AND drainage important – keep
salt moving down out of root zone,
particularly important where shallow water
tables present such as in the LMRIA
24. Cation Ionic Radius
(IR, nm)
Charge
(Z)
Ionic Potential (IP
= Z/IR, nm-1)
Na 0.102 1 9.8
K 0.138 1 7.2
Ca 0.100 2 20
Mg 0.072 2 28
Fe 0.065 3 46
Al 0.054 3 56
From Sposito 2016, Chemistry of Soils 3rd Edition
Cations with IP <
30 nm-1 tend to
be found free in
soil solution
Cations with IP 30-
100 nm-1 tend to
hyrolyse and
precipitate as
insoluble metal
oxides
Cation affinity for soil surfaces: K+ > Na+ > Li+ > Ba2+ > Sr2+ > Ca2+ > Mg2+
25. University of Adelaide 25
• Increasing evidence that Potassium can also influence soil
structural stability (although sodicity manifests more often
as Na normally more dominant in soil solution)
• Indices including K now developed, most notably the
Potassium Absorption Ratio (PAR) and Cation Ratio of
Structural Stability (CROSS, Rengasamy and Marchuk 2011):
𝐶𝑅𝑂𝑆𝑆 =
𝑁𝑎++0.56𝐾+
𝐶𝑎2++0.60𝑀𝑔2+
2
where cation concentrations are in mmol/L and 0.56 and
0.60 are coefficients relating the dispersive and flocculative
power of K and Mg, respectively, to Na and Ca, respectively.
26.
27. University of Adelaide 27
River Murray
water
Winery treated
wastewater
EC (μS/cm) 380 1286
pH 7.5 8
K+
(mmol/L) 0.09 3.22
Na+
(mmol/L) 1.75 7.00
Mg2+
(mmol/L) 0.32 0.29
Ca2+
(mmol/L) 0.27 0.75
Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) 2.3 6.9
Potassium Adsorption Ratio (PAR) 0.1 3.2
Cation Ratio of Structural Stability
(CROSS)
3.7 13
28. Long-term results
showing build-up of
K+ in subsoils with
Mg2+ decrease and
slight decline of Na+,
and little change in
Ca2+
Note: BIL switched to NPEC since
2010 (see the horizontal line)
29.
30.
31. Site Turbidity (NTU)
BIL 2 (0 – 10 cm) 20
BIL 2 (10 – 20 cm) 21
BIL 2 (20 – 30 cm) 178
BIL 4 (0 – 10 cm) 19
BIL 4 (30 – 50 cm) 141
35. Mike Carson and associates for providing the samples of
soils and the treated winery wastewater as well as
historical soil chemistry data provided by the North Para
Environmental Control (NPEC).
Tan Dang, Ivan Andelkovic, and Bogumila Tomczak for
assistance with laboratory analyses
Contact: luke.mosley@adelaide.edu.au
Editor's Notes
Now, let’s have a look at the long-term field results. I have put a figure containing four exchangeable cation accumulation in three soil layers: 0 – 10 cm, 10 – 30 cm, and 30 – 60 cm. The red dashline represents the change from BIL water to NPEC treated winery wastewater since 2010. I’ve circled one of deeper layers as an example. For exchangeable K accumulation, you can see K remained stable before the switch to NPEC, but increased gradually with time after the switch. The change of exchangeable Mg generally reduced with time before the switch, but an reduction observed after the switch. The change of exchangeable Na had little increase between 2007 and 2009, and presents a slight reduction after the switch. The change of exchangeable Ca is steady, only little alteration observed.
The EC values of all soil layers in this site are lower than 0.5 dS/m, so no salinity problem exists in this site.
RBEs: a pH of between 5.0 and 6.5. The topsoils of red brown earths are usually non-sodic, and relatively low in clay content. The subsoils are generally sodic and higher in clay content. This means that water penetration of the subsoil is low. Therefore a ‘perched’ watertable can form above the subsoils of red brown earths. Since water penetration of the topsoil is generally good, the deeper the topsoil the more water can be stored at each irrigation.
Electronic turbidity meters work by measuring the amount of light which is scattered at 90° by the suspended particles. This scattering does vary slightly with the size of the particles – large particles may be more prone to scatter light at smaller angles, while small particles will allow light to scatter at larger angles;
]
As the application of winery wastewater has become increasingly common in Australia, point 1.
Point 2
The methods applied in this project mainly focus on laboratory investigation + Point 3