This document discusses aligning information literacy with graduate employability. It begins with definitions of employability, noting it involves lifelong learning and developing skills beyond specific job requirements. A literature review found employers value soft skills like teamwork and communication over technical skills. The document explores how information literacy relates to desirable employability attributes like problem solving, working socially, and career management. It argues information literacy contributes to these attributes and workplace success through competencies like analyzing information to solve problems and tapping networks as knowledge sources. The document provides examples of integrating information literacy and employability frameworks in university programs and discusses libraries' roles in developing students' work-related skills.
A graduate employability lens for the Seven Pillars of Information Literacy
1. 1
A graduate employability lens for the
Seven Pillars of Information Literacy
Stéphane Goldstein
InformAll
Moira Bent
Newcastle University
LILAC2016
University College Dublin
23 March 2016
Photo: LenDog64, on Flickr ((CC BY-ND 2.0)
2. • Devising a graduate employability
lens for SCONUL’s Seven Pillars of
Information Literacy
• Lens is backed by a review of
sources on perceptions and
understanding of employability
• Published December 2015
Background
2
3. A conventional definition:
“A set of achievements – skills, understandings and personal attributes
– that make graduates more likely to gain employment and be
successful in their chosen occupations, which benefits themselves, the
workforce, the community and the economy.”
Cole & Tibby (2013), for HEA
What is employability?
3
4. • Not just about getting a job or possessing a set of skills /
attributes…
• Also about lifelong learning and development, in the workplace
and beyond
• Other factors come into play, not directly related to specific job
requirements: self-awareness, self-belief, deploying learning
strategies…
• Employability related to the characteristics of graduate identity,
e.g. as uncovered in an investigation of employers in East Anglia:
value, intellect and social engagement, as well as performance
(Hinchliffe and Jolly, 2011)
But is it more than that?
4
5. What graduates need to know to build and develop their own
careers, and navigate their way through the ever-evolving and
highly competitive world of work:
• Self-management
• Career-building skills (e.g. finding and using information about labour
markets, locating and applying for work, creating professional relationships…)
– some evidence that new graduates aren’t very good at this
• Implies a lifelong, proactive commitment
• Wending a way through complex career paths that are often enmeshed with
other aspects of own lives
• Adapting to and exploiting rapidly-changing nature of work, to the labour
market of the future
It’s also about future-proofing
5
6. • Review of reports, from 8 organisations, which included
employability frameworks
– Confederation of British Industry (CBI), Universities UK (UUK), National Union
of Students (NUS), Council for Industry and Higher Education (CIHE),
Association of Graduate Careers Advisory Services (AGCAS), Association of
Graduate Recruiters (AGR) and, in the USA, National Association of Colleges
and Employers (NACE)
• Strong focus on generic, soft attributes and skills
• Technical, job-specific skills and knowledge about particular
employment sector are not a prominent feature
The view from employers
(and others at the interface between HE and employment)
6
7. • “The term ‘employability’ or ‘employability skills’ is used to refer to a
set of generic softer skills such as self-management, teamworking and
communication. Much work has been done in defining what
employability means as well as in establishing a list of the
competencies that are central to being employable. Although the term
employability skills is commonly used, it is evident from our research
that employability is not solely concerned with the possession of a
certain set of skills”.
CBI also stresses the notion of a ‘positive attitude’:
• “A ‘can-do’ approach, a readiness to take part and contribute,
openness to new ideas and a drive to make these happen”
CBI (2007)
Example: what the CBI says
7
8. • Employability attributes most commonly cited as desirable:
• Other attributes include self-management / time management /
resilience, analytical skills, literacy / use of English and job-
specific skills
• Information or digital literacy do not explicitly feature
8
- Teamworking
- Communication (oral and/or written)
The two above attributes are the only ones flagged up by all
8 organisations
- Problem-solving
- Planning and organisation
- Business / customer awareness and customer handling
- Numeracy
- IT skills
Main employability attributes
9. • Cardiff: guidance on IL and employability
• Exeter: case studies on how knowledge acquired during
studies relates to workplace competencies
• Glasgow: mapping of graduate attributes against
transferability
• Leeds: employability model framed around three factors:
attributes, skills, knowledge
• Sheffield: case studies on employability and information
literacy
[Descriptions of these frameworks are included in SCONUL, 2015]
9
Employability frameworks in universities
a few examples
10. 10
Information literacy in the workplace (1)
Library at RIBA, the Royal Institute of British Architects , London
11. • Growing body of scholarly/empirical research on IL in the workplace
charted in two recent literature reviews
– Williams, Cooper & Wavell (2014) and Inskip (2014)
• A useful definition of IL adapted for the workplace, which summarises
the relationship to employability:
“A set of abilities for employees to recognize when information is
needed and to locate, evaluate, organize and use information
effectively, as well as the abilities to create, package and present
information effectively to the intended audience. Simply speaking, it is
a set of abilities for employees to interact with information when they
need to address any business issues or problems at work.”
(Cheuk, 2008)
11
Information literacy in the workplace (2)
12. • Workplace information environments are rather different from
those in academia
– Workplaces are ‘messier’ than scholarly learning environments,
characterised by business challenges that are often less linear, less
predictable and more open-ended
– In the workplace, greater emphasis on people and networks as sources
of information and knowledge
– IL as acquired at university does not necessarily translate well to
business settings – this can be disconcerting for students who need to
adapt rapidly to unfamiliar, non-academic information practices
• IL’s contribution to employability should be driven by factors and
requirements reflecting the reality and culture of the workplace,
and the contextual nature of workplace information practices
12
Information literacy in the workplace (3)
13. A worrying view from employers in the US:
“When we specifically asked employers to assess how adept new
graduates were at finding and using information, many noted that
the online proficiency they had prized at the recruiting stage
turned out, in many cases, to be both limited and limiting.”
Concern expressed by employers about competencies they feel
that graduates lack:
• Engaging team members during the research process
• Retrieving information using a variety of formats
• Finding patterns and making connections
• Exploring a topic thoroughly
(Head, 2013)
13
Information literacy in the workplace (4)
14. Business and customer awareness
• Keeping proactively informed about the practices, expectations and
goals of employers; the dynamics of the workplace; the evolving
nature of the business environments in which enterprises operate
and the needs of customers and users.
• Requires an ability to seek out, interpret, share and present
information / data which exists in many forms, and which tends to be
specific to given business environments.
• New graduates, with little or no experience of employment, may find
this attribute challenging, and employer surveys suggest that there
are concerns about graduates’ often poor grasp of the business
environment and what this entails.
14
Alignment between IL and employability (1)
15. Coping with workplace complexities
• Understanding that the information
needs of enterprises are complex,
often messy and largely determined
by the nature of their services,
products and organisational
cultures.
• Adaptability is therefore important
to cope with a context-specificity
that varies from enterprise to
enterprise.
15
Alignment between IL and employability (2)
16. Analytical skills and problem-solving
• Using, handling, interpreting and analysing information /
data, to resolve business questions and problems.
• Bears some similarity to the skills and competencies
necessary in higher education – but the key distinction is that,
in the world of employment, such know-how is deployed for
the purpose of providing practical, timely, innovative and
cost-effective solutions to meet organisational goals.
16
Alignment between IL and employability (3)
17. Ability to work socially
• Making use of people (colleagues, associates, clients and
others) and teams as valuable sources of organisational
information and knowledge; and sharing information as
appropriate.
• Implies an aptitude to work collectively and to network
imaginatively, seeking and obtaining information, and tapping
into corporate knowledge, in ways which may be less formal
and more diffuse than is the case in student settings.
17
Alignment between IL and employability (4)
18. Career management and lifelong learning capacity
Keeping informed about career opportunities, the evolving
nature of work, and the adaptability and resilience needed to
cope with that, as a means of charting career paths and defining
lifelong learning and self-development preferences.
18
Alignment between IL and employability (5)
19. 19
A couple of key points…
• Information literacy is relevant to the
workplace. It is not explicitly recognised
as a graduate employability attribute,
but it is inherent to a range of well-
recognised competencies
• The challenge is to explain how IL relates
to these competencies, and how it
contributes to the reality of workplace
culture and practices
20. 20
The employability lens in practice
• Whose job is it anyway?
• Can we / how can we use it?
• Should we / how should we use it?
21. 21
What’s our role?
• With:
– Students – in schools, FE, HE
– Academic teaching staff
– Colleagues in our workplace
– Others?
• As:
– Advocates
– Teachers
– Collaborators
– Mentors
– Facilitators
22. 22
What do you / could you do with the lens?
• Example from Newcastle
University: library staff in
conversation with careers
service a bout a new version
of the graduate skills
framework, liaising with
careers staff about getting the
IL message across to students
• Any other experiences?
23. • CBI (2007), ‘Time well spent: embedding employability in work experience’ –
http://www.educationandemployers.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/time-well-spent-cbi.pdf
• CBI (2014), ‘Gateway to Growth – CBI/Pearson Education and Skills Survey 2014’ –
http://www.cbi.org.uk/media/2809181/embargo_00.01_4_july_cbi_pearson_education_and_skills_
survey_2014.pdf
• CBI / National Union of Students (2010), ‘Working towards the future: making the most of your
time in higher education’ –
http://www.cbi.org.uk/media/1121431/cbi_nus_employability_report_march_2011.pdf
• Cheuk, B. (2008), ‘Delivering business value through information literacy in the workplace’, Libri,
58(3), pp. 137-143
• Cole, D. and Tibby, M. (2013), ‘Defining and developing your approach to employability: a
framework for higher education institutions’, Higher Education Academy –
https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/resources/employability_framework.pdf
• Head, A. et al (2013), ‘What information competencies matter in today’s workplace?’, Library and
Information Research, 37 (114), pp. 74-104 –
http://www.lirgjournal.org.uk/lir/ojs/index.php/lir/article/view/557
References (1)
23
24. • Hinchliffe, G.W. and Jolly, A. (2011), ‘Graduate identity and employability’, British Educational
Research Journal, 37(4), pp. 564-584 –
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1080/01411926.2010.482200/abstract
• Inskip C. (2014), ‘Information literacy is for life, not just for a good degree: a literature review’,
CILIP – www.cilip.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/IL in the workplace literature review Dr C
Inskip June 2014. doc.pdf
• Klusek, L. & Bornstein, J. (2006), ‘Information Literacy Skills for Business Careers: Matching Skills
to the Workplace’, Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 11, pp. 3-21 –
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J109v11n04_02
• NACE (2012), ‘Job Outlook 2013’ – http://career.sa.ucsb.edu/files/docs/handouts/job-outlook-
2013.pdf
• SCONUL (December 2015), ‘A graduate employability lens for the SCONUL Seven Pillars of
Information Literacy’ –
http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/Employability%20lens%20and%20report.
pdf
• Williams, D., Cooper, K. and Wavell C. (2014) ‘Information Literacy in the Workplace – an
annotated bibliography’, Robert Gordon University, Institute for Management, Governance and
Society (IMaGeS), in association with InformAll – http://www.researchinfonet.org/wp-
content/uploads/2014/01/Workplace-IL-annotated-bibliography.pdf
References (2)
24
Abstract from Hinchliffe and Jolly paper (2011):
“This paper develops the concept of graduate identity as a way of deepening the understanding of graduate employability. It does this through presenting research in which over 100 employers in East Anglia were asked to record their perceptions of graduates in respect of their employability. The findings suggest a composite and complex graduate identity, depending on employer size and sector. There is no one fixed identity for graduates. Nevertheless, certain themes emerged that seriously put into question the traditional model of graduate employability comprising skills, competencies and attributes. What emerges is a four-stranded concept of identity that comprises value, intellect, social engagement and performance. Thus, when assessing the potential of graduates, performance is not the only criteria that employers take into account. Moreover, the four elements of identity are by no means independent of each other but are expected to interpenetrate producing a composite identity, with different employers emphasising different facets of this identity.”
Characteristics of evolving nature of work as picked out by draft Jisc report on 'Deepening digital know-how: building digital talent’ (Helen Beetham):
less secure, more casualised
more entrepreneurial
fragmented in terms of attention, tasks, work-time and work-space
multiple and hybrid
dislocated from traditional workplaces, often characterised by home working
automated or at risk from automation