This document discusses kerosene usage in India for lighting and cooking. It finds that while kerosene usage for cooking has significantly declined, representing a success story, kerosene usage for lighting still holds sway in many rural areas, representing a failure. The document analyzes census data on kerosene usage for Delhi and finds that some districts still have over 10% of households using kerosene for cooking or lighting, showing more progress is needed. It concludes more promotion of solar home lighting could help capture the market currently occupied by kerosene for lighting.
Impact Of Educational Resources on Students' Academic Performance in Economic...
Kerosene Story: Tracking Rural Lighting and Cooking Fuel Deprivation
1. ‘The Kerosene Story‘
Energy Access: tracing the contours of deprivation
Dr. Satish Balram Agnihotri
Part - IV
2. Kerosene
Story of a success and a failure
Petroleum products claim the third biggest subsidy in our economy (about
Rs 65,000 Cr per annum) next only to food (1.2 lakh Cr) fertilizer (1.0 lakh Cr).
It is worth contrasting this with the MNRE budget of about Rs 1600 Cr p.a.
Kerosene – a prominent petroleum product enjoys a subsidy of about Rs
33/ Litre. It is used both as a source of fuel cooking and for lighting.
Use of kerosene as a fuel for cooking has declined significantly – a success
story that ‘WE’ have failed to project (Government, researchers, Civil Society
alike).
As a source of lighting it still holds a huge sway – a story of failure that the
same ‘WE’ have failed to highlight adequately.
LET US HAVE A CLOSER LOOK
3. Kerosene as a source of lighting still serves a large rural area with a large
number of districts (marked in red) where more than 2/3rds
households still depend on kerosene as source of lighting.
4. Even in urban areas there are districts where more than 2/3 rd
population depends upon Kerosene as a source of light even though the
number of district where such dependence is less than 10 % has
increased substantially (marked in green)
5. Reaching electricity to households dependant on kerosene may be a
difficult task.
Solar home lighting could be an intermediate solution.
Subsidy of less than Rs 1000 to provide solar home lighting could
significantly reduce kerosene subsidy.
A household could save 30 to 35 Litres or a saved subsidy of about Rs
1000 – 1200 per annum (Source: Field survey done by IIT Bombay
under its million solar lights programme).
Point for Petroleum ministry to ponder over!
6. Ministry of new and renewable energy (MNRE) also needs to
promote solar home lighting.
The programme must aim at capturing the space occupied by
kerosene as a source of lighting.
But as seen in part I of this analysis solar lighting systems barely
cover 0.3 to 0.5 % of household.
Census data indicates that there are nearly 7.5 crore households
using kerosene for lighting. That is the size of the market!
7. Before going to intra state differences in consumption of
Kerosene as a source for lighting, it will be useful to look at
the ‘success story’ in reducing the use of kerosene as a source
of fuel for coking
Kerosene as source of fuel for cooking
a success story
8. Districts where more than 6% urban households use kerosene as fuel (shown
in red) for cooking has drastically reduced between 2001 and 2011-
a success story that needs to be highlighted and driven further particularly in
the south western districts.
9. Interestingly the rural population lacked similar access to kerosene – were they virtuous
or priced out compared to their urban counterparts? Still, the number of districts where
less than 1% households use kerosene, has increased substantially (shown in green)
- It still is a success story!
10. How do the intra state patterns of change look like. It is worth
examining this using sub-district data i.e. block, tehsil or the thana as
available in the census.
Quite clearly each state must be having its own leading and lagging
regions, and the nature of consumption of kerosene as source of fuel for
cooking and for lighting may differ significantly.
It is also quite plausible to expect intra state variations to be sharper
at a more disaggregated level. This will become clear in the analysis
below.
We begin with Delhi – to see how has the NCT has faired
11. NCT has seen drastic reduction in use of kerosene for lighting which is
how it should be – except in the cantonment sub district where 3.8% HH still
use it - a level same as that in 2001 census. This need to be brought down.
Does it represent a case of diversion of Kerosene? This needs to be checked.
12. NCT has had a moderate success in reducing use of kerosene as fuel for cooking
yet there are still over 1.75 lakh households using it. Even though the reduction
from 2001 levels is impressive, in sub districts like Chanakyapuri , cantonment or
model town more than 9% households still use kerosene as the main source (Census
2011)! This needs to be addressed on a priority .
14. NCT of Delhi still has over 1.2 lakh households using firewood is used as fuel for cooking.
Narela reporting the highest; more than 9% of households followed by Chanakyapuri and
Cantonment sub-districts. This is puzzling and these fuel consumption patterns need
closer scrutiny. At least we should popularize modern blue flame wood burning cook-
stoves there!
15. Luckily, use of crop residue and cow dung cakes in the NCT in 2011 is
quite insignificant.
Fire – wood, crop residue, cow-dung cake, coal, and even kerosene can
be clubbed together into less clean fuels where as use of LPG – a clean
fuel (and bio-gas) is an indicator of progress in a region.
It is instructive to see, therefore, the increase in the usage of LPG in
Delhi between 2001 and 2011.
We see a substantial increase in use of LPG. However, Cantonment,
Chanakya Puri, Model town and Narela continue to show relatively
lower use of LPG (<85%)
16. From the NCT it is time to move to its neighbours – the other northern
states. We begin with the two prosperous states Punjab and Haryana.