Investigating potential of energy efficiency initiatives such as the “Green Deal” to contribute towards multi-dimensional sustainability in the English housing development pathways. It is indentifed that the role of stakeholders is crucial in making this a reality. First order learning is generally visible, however, second order learning is not apparent. Full stakeholders engagement - experts and non-experts, academics and non-academics, policy-makers and decision-makers, developers, regulators and end-users - can delve into greater granularity of interrelationships, forces and pressures, barriers and opportunities to direct successful sustainable transformations.
4. Socio-Technical regime for Building/Retrofitting
Multi-level perspective
Strategic Niche Management
Multi-level Socio-Technical
regime
4
Socio-technical
system for Buildings
Regulations and policies (e.g. The
Climate Change Act; The Energy
Act 2011; The Green Deal)
Maintenance, repairing &
retrofitting (e.g. boiler;
building infrastructure; roof &
wall insulation)
Building material and
supply chain (e.g.
cement; timber)
Markets and user
practices (e.g. green
buildings; social and
private ownership)
Ecology and
biodiversity
Economic, social
and cultural values
Building experts and
service providers
Energy providers &
infrastructure
5. Socio-Technical regime
5
Adapted from Geels (2005b)
Socio-technical
system for Buildings
Regulations and policies (e.g. The
Climate Change Act; The Energy
Act 2011; The Green Deal)
Maintenance, repairing &
retrofitting (e.g. boiler;
building infrastructure; roof &
wall insulation)
Building material and
supply chain (e.g.
cement; timber)
Markets and user
practices (e.g. green
buildings; social and
private ownership)
Ecology and
biodiversity
Economic, social
and cultural values
Building experts and
service providers
Energy providers &
infrastructure
6. Construction
technologies
Housing
designs
Local building
practices
Norms &
Standards
Culture
Economic
conditions
Climatic
Conditions
Prices and
supply in the
building
materials
market
Local
expertise
Training
Global
knowledge
Best
practices
Construction/
Retrofitting in
Building Industry
Construction/
Reconstruction
Policies
Financial
assistance
scheme
Size and
Scale
Multi-
disciplinary
experts
Local
governments
Building
Industry
Local
communities
Planning
Building
codes
Accessible for
all
Reduced
environmental
impact
Energy
efficiency
Safety
Comfort
Environmental
impact
Architects
Chartered
surveyors
BuildersEngineers
Dimensions &
Orientation
Socio-Technical Regime in
Building6
9. Factors for failure
9
Lack of technical stability
Weak regulatory framework
Societal preferences and values
Lack of demand
Inappropriate infrastructure for
maintenance
Unknown impacts of new
technologies
Source: Kemp et al. (1998)
13. Driver: Climate Change
Modus Operandi
The “Green Deal” dynamics13
CO2, Methane,
Halocarbons,
NOx, Soot
14. Climate Change
14
Technological and
Medical advances
Growth in
Population,
agriculture & animal
husbandry
CO2, Methane,
Halocarbons,
NOx, Soot
Source:
Crutzen (2002);
Wilbanks et al. (2003);
Bierbaum et al. (2007);
IPCC (2007);
Moser (2012).
15. Measures and Challenges
15
UK: Climate Change Act – 80% by 2050;
Zero emission buildings by 2050;
87% of existing building will require extensive
retrofitting
Energy Act 2011 (OPSI, 2011)
The “Green Deal”
Source: UNEP (2009); DECC (2009); DECC (2010); DCLG (2010); European Union
(2010); Boardman, 2007;
16. The “Green Deal”
16
The Building Directive
Energy Performance Certificates
“Golden Rule”
“The savings in the energy bills
resulted from installing energy
efficiency measures should
equate the cost of implementing
those measures”
Source: European Union (2010); Boardman, 2
17. 17
The
“Green Deal”
MODUS
OPERANDI
EXPERIMENTAL PROJECTS
MICRO LEVEL (niche practices)
MESO LEVEL (regimes)
“GREEN DEAL” GOV. POLICY &
VOLUNTARY MECHANISM
MACR0-LEVEL (Landscape)
National targets for UK
80% reduction in carbon emissions by
2050; Low carbon economy;
Employment boom; Energy Security;
Reduced risk to Climate Change
UNFCCC, 1992:
Stabilization of GHG
emissions;
Kyoto Protocol: Reduce 5.2%
GHG emissions between 2008
& 2012
Hokkaido Summit, G8:
Reduce 50% GHG
emissions by 2050
EU Spring Council:
Reduce20% by 2020
compared to 1990 levels;
October 2008 EU Council:
80% to 90% by 2050
compared to 1990 levels;
European Council Meeting
2008: 20% reduction, EU ETS,
20% increase in renewable
energy by 2020, CSC
technology
Socio-political & Bio-physical systems
problem: Climate Change
Retrofit and
Replicate:
£80,000
funding; 80%
CO2 emissions
Solar thermal and
wind turbine installations: match
funding by the council &
government to isolated private
households
Warm Front Scheme
(England): 2.3 m homes
upgraded for energy
efficiency
Home Energy
Conservation
Act 1995; Local
Councils: cut
residential
energy
consumption
by 30% and
report annually
Decent Homes: 40 billion
funding & 1.1 m homes
upgraded to Decent
Homes Standard
Housing market renewal
pathfinders; 1.2 billion; refurbishment
of poor home owners
“Green Deal”
Providers
Installers
Approved
Product Suppliers
Energy
Company
Accredited
Accessors
Consumers
Support 1000
“Green Deal”
apprentices
100,000 Jobs by 2015 14 million households &
business will become energy
efficient
1996-2012
2012
18. The “Green Deal” challenges
18
The “Green Deal” prerequisite ‘golden
rule
No upfront cost
No guarantee for actual cash savings
Actual cash savings subjected to
The users’ awareness
Practices, and
Sense of ownership and responsibility
19. The “Green Deal” challenges
19
Implementation subjected to
Preferences
Affordability
Technical specifications
The local social-technical niche.
Not a easy choice
Voluntary
20. The way forward
20
Beyond the locked-in characteristic
Profound changes
New characteristics
Source: Farmer and Guy (2005);
Guy (2006); Lovell et al., (2009);
Rip and Kemp (1998); Geels (2002).
21. Keys
Construction
technologies
Housing
designs
Local building
practices
Norms &
Standards
Culture
Economic
conditions
Climatic
Conditions
Prices and
supply in the
building
materials
market
Local
expertise
Training
Global
knowledge
Best
practices
Construction/
Retrofitting in
Building Industry
Construction/
Reconstruction
Policies
Financial
assistance
scheme
Size and
Scale
Multi-
disciplinary
experts
Local
governments
Building
Industry
Local
communities
Planning
Building
codes
Accessible for
all
Reduced
environmental
impact
Energy
efficiency
Safety
Comfort
Environmental
impact
Architects
Chartered
surveyors
BuildersEngineers
Dimensions &
Orientation
Natural lighting,
Ventilation & Spatial
organization
Heating,
ventilation &
air
conditioning
Building
fabric
Lighting
Water
heating
Microgeneration
Green Deal
Provider
Installer
Energy
Provider
Assessor
Supplier
Climate
Change Act
2008
EXISTING
REGIME
COMPONENTS
NEW REGIME
COMPONENTS
New characteristic
Socio-Technical Regime21
22. Stakeholder engagement
22
• Sustainabl
e products
• Targets
• Directives
• Sustainabl
e lifestyles
• Sustainabl
e targets
Busines
ses
Users
Supplier
s
Regulato
rs
24. Summary
24
Climate change
80% reduction in carbon emissions
by 2050
The “Green Deal”
Contributes towards SNM literature
25. Conclusion
25
The “Green Deal”
Potential to contribute
Role of stakeholders
Second order learning
Full stakeholders engagement
Greater granularity
Hello everyone, good afternoon. I am Renuka Thakore. I am currently doing my Phd in Building Sustainability at Centre for Sustainable Development, University of Central Lancashire, United Kingdom. I started my Phd this January and the paper I am going to present today is the outcome of the literature review carried out in the investigation phase of my Phd project. Professor Jack Goulding is my Director of Studies and also the co-author of this paper. He joins me in thanking you for giving us this wonderful opportunity to present our paper in the conference.
The United Kingdom building sector has been challenged to retrofit a enormous stock of existing buildings in order to increase its energy efficiency and adaptive capacity for climate change impacts. Addressing such challenges will require systematic structural changes in both, Socio-Technical and Socio-Political infrastructure. As a result, the UK Government has introduced a raft of initiatives; one of which is the “Green Deal”. The “Green Deal” is an innovative programme proposed to “foster energy efficiency dynamics in UK buildings”. Simultaneously, a numbers of studies have suggested the approach of strategic niche management for successful sustainable technological transitions. Thus analysing the “Green Deal” mechanism using ex-ante strategic niche management approach would help to critically assess the reforms undertaken for the programme and guide the practitioners to take improved actions. So the topic of the presentation is Fostering energy efficiency dynamic through Ex-ante strategic niche management: the UK perspective.
The paper serves three purposes. First, the paper introduces multi-level Socio-Technical regime for construction/retrofitting in building industry. Second, the ex-ante strategic niche management approach has been applied to analyse the dynamic of “Green Deal” initiative. Thereby critically assessing technological, organisational and institutional reforms undertaken for the initiative in the processes for sustainable technological transition, and third, the paper contributes towards strategic niche management literature which lacks in practical examples in assisting practitioners in regime transition.
The first section will introduce Socio-Technical regime for building industry and discuss theoretical concept of multi-level perspective for sustainable transition process.
This figure represents theoretical concept of Socio-Technical regime for buildings. Accordingly a Socio-Technical regime consist of various attributes. A regime is a combination of components ranging from artefacts, material networks, infrastructure, technology, supply chain, economic regime and the lifestyles adapted to and for the artefacts. In short, when a technical regime of production and distribution incorporates the components related to the users, it is called a Socio-Technical regime. Complementarities between components make these regimes function and support societal needs for housing, mobility, food, communication and so on. Nevertheless these complementarities are equally responsible for making these regimes dynamically rigid, stable, or locked-in. Modern societies are challenged by serious problems such as increasing carbon emissions and effects of climate change. Thus, radical changes or regime transitions are necessary more than ever.
This figure represents detailed set of complementarities between components of existing Socio-Technical regime for buildings that would have technologies and relevant technical actors developed within the regime in construction in UK.
Multi-level perspective in transition theory suggests that the transition process occurs at three operational levels: macro, meso- and micro- embedded within three analytical concepts in a nested hierarchy: landscape, regimes and niches respectively. Landscapes are external structures, set of heterogeneous factors consisting of wider institutional adjustments. Niches are small experimental projects having support mechanism, away from the market, trying to build social networks and contribute towards the development of sustainable regimes.
Further, on the landscape levels, changes occur gradually and put pressures on the regime. And on niche level, number of experimental projects leading to innovations too exert pressure on the regime. As time progress, the radical innovations break out of niche level into the regime level. Simultaneously, the on-going processes in regime and landscape create a window of opportunity and a new sociotechnical regime is formed.
A number of studies have effectively analysed underlying dynamics and mechanisms responsible for technological transitions and suggest that SNM can be a valuable tool for practitioners in the transition of technological innovations into the mainstream. Various factors identified for failure of such transition are lack of technical stability, weak regulatory framework; societal preferences and values; lack of demand; incompetent infrastructure for maintenance; and unknown impacts of new technologies.
Even so, scholars argue that radical innovations succeed. They have identified three interrelated processes for the success of such transition: One, expectations and promises perceived by the innovations should be constructively translated and communicated into requirements that are inevitable for the societal development.
Second, networks between different levels and between different actors within the level at project as well as multi-project level (niche/s) should be created.
And third, in line with theories governing organisation learning, actors involved in the project directly or indirectly should learn from experiences through first and second order learning process contributing towards the stability of the niche or the technology.
Having said that, the second section will discuss climate change as one of the driver for the “Green Deal” programme and analyse the “Green Deal” Modus Operandi using ex-ante strategic niche management approach.
While many factors influence climate, anthropogenic activities resulting from technological and medical advances; and the consequential growth of population, agriculture and animal husbandry has led to exponential increase in carbon-dioxide concentration over the past 50 years. Moreover, the burning of fossil-fuel and large-scale land-use changes, along with different energy uses, combustion and manufacturing processes, all have collectively intensified climate change.
Recognising the responsibility of tackling climate change, the UK government has set ambitious targets to reduce carbon emissions through regulations such as the Climate Change Act which binds UK to reduce carbon emissions by 80% by 2050. Given this, all buildings would need to be zero emissions by 2050. But, UK has a large existing building stock of which 87% would still exist in 2050. It is posited that these buildings may not offer comfort, safety and resource efficiency to the users’ expectations in coming years; instead their use would have unsustainable impacts on societal development. The UK government has announced various initiatives through Energy Act 2011, of which the “Green Deal” is to enable existing building become more energy efficient using retrofitting technologies.
Retrofitting in buildings is not a new concept; however, speedy mass retrofitting of all existing buildings to increase energy performance in accordance to the Building Directive adopted by UK in domestic sector and bringing properties to bands A and B on the Energy Performance Certificates is certainly a huge challenge.
Also amongst many other things, satisfying the golden rule associated with the green deal is the most important requirement because without which the green deal plan cannot go ahead. The Golden rule is that the savings in the energy bills resulted from the installation of energy efficiency measures should equate the cost of implementing those measures.
This figure analysis the “Green Deal” modus operandi applying ex-ante strategic niche management approach. It is observed that macro-level strategies have exerted pressure for the development of sustainable regime. At the same time, pioneering experimental projects have increased energy efficiency measures and facilitated first-order learning processes The success of experimental projects assert that it is developing essential technology and experts required for more sustainable building regime.
However, there are several challenges faced by the Green deal to be successful because of the prerequisite golden rule. Paying no upfront cost would undoubtedly be attractive to the consumers. However, not government or the installer can guarantee actual cash savings because they are subjected to the users’ awareness, practices and sense of ownership and responsibility.
Moreover, the implementation of energy efficiency measures in the building is subjected to owner’s preferences and affordability. Technical specifications required for energy efficiency would be difficult for a consumer to understand. The efficiency techniques would depend on the local social-technical niche and most importantly, the scheme is voluntary and the consumer is the decision maker for “Green Deal” plan.
Strategic niche management approach states that existing regime can become more sustainable when various attributes ranging from hard physical material artefacts to the users’ soft social practices would adapt the technology going beyond the locked-in characteristic of the regime. For such sustainable transitions to occur, existing regimes have to undergo profound changes to uproot the existing mutual interdependent technological performance and social practices, which together would dictate the new characteristics of sustainable Socio-Technical regimes as shown in this figure.
Thus the result of process changes occurs at variety of points of a complex web structures. The radical changes come first from the pioneering experimental projects that have been nourished in protected spaces. New developed characteristics of the niches would form new set of complementarities between components of Socio-Technical regime which would allow voicing and shaping of requirements, networking and first and second order learning process resulting into successful transition.
Thus the research findings advocate the need for full engagement with stakeholders that would deliver the required dynamics highlighted in the previous figure. The building assessment model should be extended to include a greater granularity of details, particularly in the unit of analysis and metrics employed for measuring and quantifying energy efficiency sustainability indicators and in particular capable of assisting the users to take responsibilities for their own actions.
Finally in conclusion, I would highlight few points and show how this case study has contributed towards the strategic niche management literature.
Climate change is one of most serious problem resulted from immense anthropogenic human activities. The UK government is committed to reduce carbon emissions by 80% by 2050 but challenged to retrofit huge stock of existing buildings. Thus an innovative programme the green deal has been launched. The novel approach of using strategic niche management as an ex ante tool has been applied to analysis of the green deal dynamics.
25. Analysis of the “Green Deal” shows that it is a systematic coordinated response programme possessing the potential to contribute towards sustainable building regime. However, the role of stakeholders including government and consumers is very important. A strategic approach should be adopted for second order learning to maximise the benefits. Thus the need for full engagement with stakeholders is advocated. Moreover, it is posited that the delivery and dynamics highlighted in the Figure 4 should also be extended to include a greater granularity of details, particularly in the unit of analysis and metrics employed for measuring and quantifying energy efficiency sustainability indicators.
Thank you for your attention and I invite you for questions and appreciate your feedback.