SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 7
Download to read offline
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology
Special Issue on UKM Teaching and Learning Congress 2013, June (2015) 91 - 90
© School of Engineering, Taylor’s University
91
Peer-review under responsibility of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE IN ENGINEERING
MATHEMATICS COURSES: VECTOR CALCULUS VERSUS
DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
F. M. HAMZAH*, P. S. D. KAMARULZAMAN, N. A. ISMAIL, K. JAFAR
Centre for Engineering Education Research, The Fundamental Studies of Engineering
Unit, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment,
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia,43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
*Corresponding Author: kagba2006@gmail.com
Abstract
Students’ performance can be evaluated through final exam results consist of
students’ assignment, quizzes, e-learning tutorial and mid-semester exam. In
engineering, mathematics is one of the important course students should
dominated especially in Differential Equation (DE) course. However, students
should have deep understanding of some important topics covered in Vector
Calculus (VC) at early stage such as Integration, Differentiation and Series
before they taken the DE course. This article attempts to explore students'
performance and correlation between two mathematics courses, VC and DE
among engineering students. A study is carried out on student’s results data which
consisted of 205 engineering students from four different departments;
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering (JKAS), Department of
Mechanical and Materials Engineering (JKMB), Department of Chemical and
Process Engineering (JKKP) and Department of Electrical, Electronic and
Systems Engineering (JKEES). The results, which are verified by using paired t-
test and Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, indicated that VC and
DE courses are related and have positive linear relationship.
Keywords: Students’ performance, Grades, Vector calculus, Differential equations.
1. Introduction
Mathematics is an expression of the human mind reflects the active will, the
contemplative reason, and the desire for aesthetic perfection which the basic
Students’ Performance In Engineering Mathematics Courses: Vectors . . . . 92
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Special Issue 2 6/2015
elements are logic and intuition, analysis and construction, generality and
individuality [1]. According to Fennema and Sherman [2], Mathematics is used
and studied in courses other than mathematics such as computing, chemistry
and physics. Mathematical courses are widely used in almost all educational
institutions.
Engineering Mathematics is a fundamental course for all engineering courses
at tertiary level typically consisting of Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra and
Differential Equations. Students in Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment
(FKAB), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) are required to take Vector
Calculus (VC) course at first semester and Differential Equations (DE) course for
third semester. In engineering, mathematics is one of the important course students
should dominated especially in DE course. However, students should have deep
understanding of some important topics covered in Vector Calculus (VC) at early
stage such as Integration, Differentiation and Series before they taken the DE
course. The purposes of this paper are to explore students' performance and
correlation between two mathematics courses among engineering students.
2. Methodology
A total number of 205 students’ final exam results for two courses VC and DE are
used for the data in this study from four different departments which are
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering (JKAS), Department of
Mechanical and Materials Engineering (JKMB), Department of Chemical and
Process Engineering (JKKP) and Department of Electrical, Electronic and
Systems Engineering (JKEES). Final exam results data consist of students’
assignment, quizzes, e-learning tutorial and mid-semester exam. The data was
analysed using Microsoft Office Excel and SPSS (version 18). Analyses included
descriptive statistics. A paired t-test and Pearson product-moment correlation
coefficient tests was conducted to analyse the results of VC and DE. The score
interval for each grade is shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Score interval for each grade.
Grades Score Interval
A 75-100
B 60-74.9
C 45-59.9
D 35-44.9
E 0-34.9
2.1. Paired t-test
Typically researchers analyse paired data using the paired t-test, which essentially
is a one-sample Student t-test performed on difference scores [3]. It is the most
basic statistical test that measures group differences which is appropriately used
when the researcher wishes to determine whether two groups, as defined by the
independent variable, differ on the basis of a selected dependent variable [4, 5].
Andrew et al. [5] Also states that the t-test allows a researcher to compare a
93 F. M. Hamzah et al.
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Special Issue 2 6/2015
categorical independent variable with two groups on the basis of an interval or
ratio-scaled dependent variable specifically. The t-test for two dependent groups
is used to compare the mean of the two data sets obtained from the same sample.
Two hypotheses tested are as follows:
0H : There are no significant differences between VC and DE final exam results
1H : There are significant differences between VC and DE final exam results
If p-value 05.0=< α , 0H is rejected and shows that there are significant
differences between the mean of VC and DE final exam results.
A paired t-test is used to calculate differences of group by examining the
means of the groups [6]. The difference between the means of the groups is
divided by the standard error of the difference. The variance is simply the square
of the standard deviation. This calculation results in a t-value, which can be
referred in table of significance to test for a significant difference between the
groups. Fortunately, in this paper, we can use SPSS to automate this process. The
formula for the test statistics for paired differences is
ˮ =
 
(1)
where
= Mean of the paired differences
ˤ = Difference in the means
J = Standard deviation of the difference
J = Number of sample size
2.2. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient
Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient test is used to measure the
existence of a linear relationship between two variables. There are three types of
linear relationship that may exist between these two variables namely positive
linear correlation, negative linear correlation and no correlation. This can be
tested by using these two hypotheses:
0H : There is no linear relationship between VC and DE
1H : There is a linear relationship between VC and DE
When p-value 0.05α = (95% level of confidence), then 0H is rejected and
show that there is a significant linear relationship between VC and DE. The
strength of these variables can be seen by the value of the correlation coefficient.
In addition, correlation coefficient for each department is also has been investigated.
This is a measure of the strength and direction of the linear relationship
between the two variables [7]. This is the correlation coefficient of the pair of
variables indicated. The correlation coefficient can range from -1 to +1, with -1
indicating a perfect negative correlation, +1 indicating a perfect positive
Students’ Performance In Engineering Mathematics Courses: Vectors . . . . 94
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Special Issue 2 6/2015
correlation, and 0 indicating no correlation at all. A variable correlated with it will
always have a correlation coefficient of 1.
3. Results and Discussion
Based on Fig. 1, the pie chart shows the percentage of students for each
department JKAS, JKMB, JKKP and JKEES. JKKP and JKEES shows the
highest number of students with the same percentage of 27.8, followed by JKAS
with the percentage of 22.9 and the lowest percentage is 21.5 for JKMB.
Fig. 1. Distribution of engineering students by department.
Figure 2 shows the distribution of students for VC and DE according to each
grade. The bar chart shows there is high number of difference which is almost
half who get grade A, B, C and D for the two courses. In particular, the number of
students who get grades A and B in DE are higher than VC and the numbers of
students who get grades C and D in DE are smaller than VC. Obviously, none of
the students fail in DE (grade E) course compare to VC.
Fig. 2. Distribution of students for VC and DE courses by grade.
Figure 3 shows the comparison of grades for VC and DE courses according to
departments. The bar chart shows for all departments JKAS, JKMB, JKKP and
JKEES produces same results as increasing number of students get grades A, and
B and decreasing number of students get grades C and D for DE compare with
VC course. It is also found that none of the students get grade D in DE for JKAS
and JKKP compare to VC. Surprisingly, there are no students fails (grade E) in
these two courses for all departments except for JKEES.
95 F. M. Hamzah et al.
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Special Issue 2 6/2015
Fig. 3. Distribution of students for vector
calculus and differential equations courses by departments.
Table 2 indicates the results for paired samples t-test and Pearson product-
moment correlation coefficient of the pair variables VC and DE. The t-test
statistics is -22.077 and the corresponding two-tailed p-value is 0.000 which is
less than level of significance (α) 0.05. Therefore, we can conclude that there is
significance difference in final exam marks between VC and DE course. The
value of mean difference with -12.1560 suggested that mean marks for DE course
1
15 24
77
25 15
0
50
A B C D E
No.ofStudents
Grades
JKAS
VC
DE
1
19 20
4
15
20
8
1
0
10
20
30
A B C D E
No.ofStudents
Grades
JKMB
VC
DE
3
12
37
5
18
29
10
0
20
40
A B C D E
No.ofStudents
Grades
JKKP
VC
DE
2
13
31
9
2
12
35
9
1
0
20
40
A B C D E
No.ofStudents
Grades
JKEES
VC
DE
Students’ Performance In Engineering Mathematics Courses: Vectors . . . . 96
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Special Issue 2 6/2015
is greater than VC course. The value of the Pearson correlation of 0.714 and p-
value is less than 0.05 imply there is significant strong positive linear relationship
between VC and DE. The positive value of the correlation means that students
who scored high on the VC course tend to score high on the DE course.
Table 2. Paired Samples t-Test and Pearson
product-moment correlation coefficient.
Courses N
Mean
difference
t-test
Pearson
Correlation, r
Sig. (p-
value)
VC-DE 205 -12.1560 -22.077 0.714 0.000
Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient of the pair variables VC and
DE for each department is shown in Table 3. Generally, the Pearson correlation
for each department more than 0.6 and p-value is less than 0.05 but the highest
value of Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient of 0.745 which is JKAS
whilst the lowest is JKMB imply there is significant strong positive linear
relationship between VC and DE. The highest positive value of the correlation
from JKEES means that students who scored high on the VC course tend to score
high on the DE course compare than other department.
Table 3. Pearson product-moment
correlation coefficient for each department.
Department Courses N Pearson Correlation, r Sig. (p-value)
JKAS VC-DE 47 0.745 0.000
JKMB VC-DE 44 0.680 0.000
JKKP VC-DE 57 0.732 0.000
JKEES VC-DE 57 0.724 0.000
Based on Table 4, we have found that the corresponding two-tailed p-value for
all department is 0.000 which is less than level of significance ( α ) 0.05.
Therefore, we can conclude that there is significance difference in final exam
marks between VC and DE course for all departments. The value of mean
difference with all the negative values suggested that mean marks for DE course
is greater than VC course but the highest mean differences is from JKEES whilst
the lowest is from JKAS.
Table 4. Paired Samples t-Test for each department.
Department Mean Difference SD Difference t-test Sig (p-value)
JKAS -9.63830 7.05083 -9.372 0.000
JKMB -10.93182 8.40652 -8.626 0.000
JKKP -13.42105 7.32156 -13.839 0.000
JKEES -13.91228 8.15099 -12.886 0.000
97 F. M. Hamzah et al.
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Special Issue 2 6/2015
4. Conclusion
An analysis on students’ performance based on their final exam results in two
Engineering Mathematics courses: Vector Calculus (VC) and Differential
Equations (DE) were conducted. Based on analysis and results, the t-test and
Pearson correlation shows that VC and DE courses are related and have positive
linear relationship. The main reason of the correlation of these two courses is
topics covered in VC such as Integration and Differentiation are the basic
knowledge students have to know in order to learn DE. This shows that students
have to take VC course before they proceed to the DE course. As conclusion, VC
is important as preparatory course for DE course.
Acknowledgement
This is a collaboration research between Centre for Engineering Education
Research (www.ukm.my/p3k), and Unit of Fundamental Engineering Studies.
The authors would like to thank the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia for
supporting this work via research grants, GGPM-2012-075 and PTS-2014-036
respectively in the effort of improving the quality of teaching and learning in
engineering education.
References
1. Courant, R.; and Robbins, H. (1996). What is Mathematics? An elementary
approach to ideas and methods. Oxford University Press.
2. Fennema, E.; and Sherman, J. (1977). Sex-related differences in mathematics
achievement, spatial visualization and affective factors. American
Educational Research Journal, 14(1), 51-71.
3. Zimmerman, D. W. (1997). Teacher’s corner: A note on interpretation of the
paired-samples t test. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics,
22(3), 349-360.
4. King, M. R.; and Mody, N. A. (2010). Numerical and statistical methods for
bioengineering: applications in MATLAB. Cambridge University Press.
5. Andrew, D. P.; Pedersen, P. M.; and McEvoy, C. D. (2011). Research
methods and design in sport management. Human Kinetics.
6. Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data
analysis using SPSS. McGraw-Hill International.
7. Bui, Y. N. (2013). How to write a master's thesis. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.

More Related Content

What's hot

An ahp (analytic hierarchy process)fce (fuzzy comprehensive evaluation) based...
An ahp (analytic hierarchy process)fce (fuzzy comprehensive evaluation) based...An ahp (analytic hierarchy process)fce (fuzzy comprehensive evaluation) based...
An ahp (analytic hierarchy process)fce (fuzzy comprehensive evaluation) based...ijcsa
 
AN E XAMINATION OF T HE E FFECTIVENESS OF T EACHING D ATA M ODELLING C ONCEPTS
AN E XAMINATION OF T HE E FFECTIVENESS OF T EACHING D ATA M ODELLING C ONCEPTSAN E XAMINATION OF T HE E FFECTIVENESS OF T EACHING D ATA M ODELLING C ONCEPTS
AN E XAMINATION OF T HE E FFECTIVENESS OF T EACHING D ATA M ODELLING C ONCEPTSijdms
 
ch11sped420PP
ch11sped420PPch11sped420PP
ch11sped420PPfiegent
 
The effects of remedial mathematics in learning college algebra
The effects of remedial mathematics in learning college algebraThe effects of remedial mathematics in learning college algebra
The effects of remedial mathematics in learning college algebraAlexander Decker
 
IRJET- Using Data Mining to Predict Students Performance
IRJET-  	  Using Data Mining to Predict Students PerformanceIRJET-  	  Using Data Mining to Predict Students Performance
IRJET- Using Data Mining to Predict Students PerformanceIRJET Journal
 
Psyc 354 Massive Success / snaptutorial.com
Psyc 354 Massive Success / snaptutorial.comPsyc 354 Massive Success / snaptutorial.com
Psyc 354 Massive Success / snaptutorial.comReynolds45
 
Using DOK to Write Common Assessments
Using DOK to Write Common AssessmentsUsing DOK to Write Common Assessments
Using DOK to Write Common AssessmentsJeremy
 
Measurement and instrumentaion
Measurement and instrumentaionMeasurement and instrumentaion
Measurement and instrumentaionahmedabbas1121
 
Appel, Matthew_math sample
Appel, Matthew_math sampleAppel, Matthew_math sample
Appel, Matthew_math sampleMatthew Appel
 
Lesson 1 05 measuring central tendency
Lesson 1 05 measuring central tendencyLesson 1 05 measuring central tendency
Lesson 1 05 measuring central tendencyPerla Pelicano Corpez
 
Business statistics-i-part1-aarhus-bss
Business statistics-i-part1-aarhus-bssBusiness statistics-i-part1-aarhus-bss
Business statistics-i-part1-aarhus-bssAntonio Rivero Ostoic
 
MLCS Presentation AMATYC 2012 handout
MLCS Presentation AMATYC 2012 handoutMLCS Presentation AMATYC 2012 handout
MLCS Presentation AMATYC 2012 handoutkathleenalmy
 

What's hot (18)

An ahp (analytic hierarchy process)fce (fuzzy comprehensive evaluation) based...
An ahp (analytic hierarchy process)fce (fuzzy comprehensive evaluation) based...An ahp (analytic hierarchy process)fce (fuzzy comprehensive evaluation) based...
An ahp (analytic hierarchy process)fce (fuzzy comprehensive evaluation) based...
 
AN E XAMINATION OF T HE E FFECTIVENESS OF T EACHING D ATA M ODELLING C ONCEPTS
AN E XAMINATION OF T HE E FFECTIVENESS OF T EACHING D ATA M ODELLING C ONCEPTSAN E XAMINATION OF T HE E FFECTIVENESS OF T EACHING D ATA M ODELLING C ONCEPTS
AN E XAMINATION OF T HE E FFECTIVENESS OF T EACHING D ATA M ODELLING C ONCEPTS
 
ch11sped420PP
ch11sped420PPch11sped420PP
ch11sped420PP
 
C0364010013
C0364010013C0364010013
C0364010013
 
The effects of remedial mathematics in learning college algebra
The effects of remedial mathematics in learning college algebraThe effects of remedial mathematics in learning college algebra
The effects of remedial mathematics in learning college algebra
 
IRJET- Using Data Mining to Predict Students Performance
IRJET-  	  Using Data Mining to Predict Students PerformanceIRJET-  	  Using Data Mining to Predict Students Performance
IRJET- Using Data Mining to Predict Students Performance
 
Lecture 1
Lecture 1Lecture 1
Lecture 1
 
Psyc 354 Massive Success / snaptutorial.com
Psyc 354 Massive Success / snaptutorial.comPsyc 354 Massive Success / snaptutorial.com
Psyc 354 Massive Success / snaptutorial.com
 
Using DOK to Write Common Assessments
Using DOK to Write Common AssessmentsUsing DOK to Write Common Assessments
Using DOK to Write Common Assessments
 
Measurement and instrumentaion
Measurement and instrumentaionMeasurement and instrumentaion
Measurement and instrumentaion
 
Assess curr mathg03
Assess curr mathg03Assess curr mathg03
Assess curr mathg03
 
Soalan
SoalanSoalan
Soalan
 
Appel, Matthew_math sample
Appel, Matthew_math sampleAppel, Matthew_math sample
Appel, Matthew_math sample
 
Lesson 1 05 measuring central tendency
Lesson 1 05 measuring central tendencyLesson 1 05 measuring central tendency
Lesson 1 05 measuring central tendency
 
Assess curr mathg08
Assess curr mathg08Assess curr mathg08
Assess curr mathg08
 
bayes_proj
bayes_projbayes_proj
bayes_proj
 
Business statistics-i-part1-aarhus-bss
Business statistics-i-part1-aarhus-bssBusiness statistics-i-part1-aarhus-bss
Business statistics-i-part1-aarhus-bss
 
MLCS Presentation AMATYC 2012 handout
MLCS Presentation AMATYC 2012 handoutMLCS Presentation AMATYC 2012 handout
MLCS Presentation AMATYC 2012 handout
 

Viewers also liked

Mix Nashville Email Promotion
Mix Nashville Email PromotionMix Nashville Email Promotion
Mix Nashville Email PromotionTyler Reed
 
Dss es nn fuzzy l vr etc
Dss es nn fuzzy l vr etcDss es nn fuzzy l vr etc
Dss es nn fuzzy l vr etcAkshay Sikarwar
 
Dietro lo schermo: come migliorare la vita delle persone rovinando la propria
Dietro lo schermo: come migliorare la vita delle persone rovinando la propriaDietro lo schermo: come migliorare la vita delle persone rovinando la propria
Dietro lo schermo: come migliorare la vita delle persone rovinando la propriaMartina De Natale
 
Gica's habits by stefy
Gica's habits by stefyGica's habits by stefy
Gica's habits by stefyStefy1307
 
Alexandros Stogiannis_Professional_ Portfolio
Alexandros Stogiannis_Professional_ PortfolioAlexandros Stogiannis_Professional_ Portfolio
Alexandros Stogiannis_Professional_ PortfolioAlexandros Stogiannis
 
Music player network non endemic profile
Music player network non endemic profileMusic player network non endemic profile
Music player network non endemic profileTyler Reed
 
Broad market indices by Akshay Sikarwar
Broad market indices by Akshay SikarwarBroad market indices by Akshay Sikarwar
Broad market indices by Akshay SikarwarAkshay Sikarwar
 
Pistolshot presentazione finale
Pistolshot presentazione finalePistolshot presentazione finale
Pistolshot presentazione finaleMartina De Natale
 
Product list_ Mayura Analytical
Product list_ Mayura AnalyticalProduct list_ Mayura Analytical
Product list_ Mayura Analyticalmrao13
 
Guitar Player Subscriber Profile
Guitar Player Subscriber ProfileGuitar Player Subscriber Profile
Guitar Player Subscriber ProfileTyler Reed
 
ROL Building Concepts
ROL Building ConceptsROL Building Concepts
ROL Building Conceptsrolchurch
 
Chhattisgarh State by Akshay SIkarwar
Chhattisgarh State by Akshay SIkarwarChhattisgarh State by Akshay SIkarwar
Chhattisgarh State by Akshay SIkarwarAkshay Sikarwar
 
Presentation on Ratan Tata
Presentation on Ratan TataPresentation on Ratan Tata
Presentation on Ratan TataAkshay Sikarwar
 

Viewers also liked (16)

Mix Nashville Email Promotion
Mix Nashville Email PromotionMix Nashville Email Promotion
Mix Nashville Email Promotion
 
Dss es nn fuzzy l vr etc
Dss es nn fuzzy l vr etcDss es nn fuzzy l vr etc
Dss es nn fuzzy l vr etc
 
Dietro lo schermo: come migliorare la vita delle persone rovinando la propria
Dietro lo schermo: come migliorare la vita delle persone rovinando la propriaDietro lo schermo: come migliorare la vita delle persone rovinando la propria
Dietro lo schermo: come migliorare la vita delle persone rovinando la propria
 
Gica's habits by stefy
Gica's habits by stefyGica's habits by stefy
Gica's habits by stefy
 
Alexandros Stogiannis_Professional_ Portfolio
Alexandros Stogiannis_Professional_ PortfolioAlexandros Stogiannis_Professional_ Portfolio
Alexandros Stogiannis_Professional_ Portfolio
 
Stefi v
Stefi vStefi v
Stefi v
 
Music player network non endemic profile
Music player network non endemic profileMusic player network non endemic profile
Music player network non endemic profile
 
Broad market indices by Akshay Sikarwar
Broad market indices by Akshay SikarwarBroad market indices by Akshay Sikarwar
Broad market indices by Akshay Sikarwar
 
Pistolshot presentazione finale
Pistolshot presentazione finalePistolshot presentazione finale
Pistolshot presentazione finale
 
Product list_ Mayura Analytical
Product list_ Mayura AnalyticalProduct list_ Mayura Analytical
Product list_ Mayura Analytical
 
Mba i rm measurement
Mba i   rm measurementMba i   rm measurement
Mba i rm measurement
 
Guitar Player Subscriber Profile
Guitar Player Subscriber ProfileGuitar Player Subscriber Profile
Guitar Player Subscriber Profile
 
ROL Building Concepts
ROL Building ConceptsROL Building Concepts
ROL Building Concepts
 
Mba lecture1
Mba lecture1Mba lecture1
Mba lecture1
 
Chhattisgarh State by Akshay SIkarwar
Chhattisgarh State by Akshay SIkarwarChhattisgarh State by Akshay SIkarwar
Chhattisgarh State by Akshay SIkarwar
 
Presentation on Ratan Tata
Presentation on Ratan TataPresentation on Ratan Tata
Presentation on Ratan Tata
 

Similar to Students' Performance in Engineering Math Courses

Students’ satisfaction with service quality
Students’ satisfaction with service quality Students’ satisfaction with service quality
Students’ satisfaction with service quality Alexander Decker
 
IRJET- Effectiveness of Constructivist Instructional Approach on Achievem...
IRJET-  	  Effectiveness of Constructivist Instructional Approach on Achievem...IRJET-  	  Effectiveness of Constructivist Instructional Approach on Achievem...
IRJET- Effectiveness of Constructivist Instructional Approach on Achievem...IRJET Journal
 
Correlations of Students’ Academic Achievement in Mathematics with Their Erro...
Correlations of Students’ Academic Achievement in Mathematics with Their Erro...Correlations of Students’ Academic Achievement in Mathematics with Their Erro...
Correlations of Students’ Academic Achievement in Mathematics with Their Erro...paperpublications3
 
An empirical study on skewness of test scores of a management subject in an a...
An empirical study on skewness of test scores of a management subject in an a...An empirical study on skewness of test scores of a management subject in an a...
An empirical study on skewness of test scores of a management subject in an a...prjpublications
 
DISCUSSION ON THE TALENT TRAINING OF UNIVERSITIES WITH INDUSTRY CHARACTERISTI...
DISCUSSION ON THE TALENT TRAINING OF UNIVERSITIES WITH INDUSTRY CHARACTERISTI...DISCUSSION ON THE TALENT TRAINING OF UNIVERSITIES WITH INDUSTRY CHARACTERISTI...
DISCUSSION ON THE TALENT TRAINING OF UNIVERSITIES WITH INDUSTRY CHARACTERISTI...ijejournal
 
Regression techniques to study the student performance in post graduate exam...
Regression techniques to study the student performance in post  graduate exam...Regression techniques to study the student performance in post  graduate exam...
Regression techniques to study the student performance in post graduate exam...IJMER
 
Didactic analysis of the items proposed in the competition test of entry to t...
Didactic analysis of the items proposed in the competition test of entry to t...Didactic analysis of the items proposed in the competition test of entry to t...
Didactic analysis of the items proposed in the competition test of entry to t...journal ijrtem
 
Didactic analysis of the items proposed in the competition test of entry to t...
Didactic analysis of the items proposed in the competition test of entry to t...Didactic analysis of the items proposed in the competition test of entry to t...
Didactic analysis of the items proposed in the competition test of entry to t...journal ijrtem
 
QUANTIFYING THE THEORY VS. PROGRAMMING DISPARITY USING SPECTRAL BIPARTIVITY A...
QUANTIFYING THE THEORY VS. PROGRAMMING DISPARITY USING SPECTRAL BIPARTIVITY A...QUANTIFYING THE THEORY VS. PROGRAMMING DISPARITY USING SPECTRAL BIPARTIVITY A...
QUANTIFYING THE THEORY VS. PROGRAMMING DISPARITY USING SPECTRAL BIPARTIVITY A...ijcsit
 
Quantifying the Theory Vs. Programming Disparity using Spectral Bipartivity A...
Quantifying the Theory Vs. Programming Disparity using Spectral Bipartivity A...Quantifying the Theory Vs. Programming Disparity using Spectral Bipartivity A...
Quantifying the Theory Vs. Programming Disparity using Spectral Bipartivity A...AIRCC Publishing Corporation
 
Machine Learning Regression Analysis of EDX 2012-13 Data for Identifying the ...
Machine Learning Regression Analysis of EDX 2012-13 Data for Identifying the ...Machine Learning Regression Analysis of EDX 2012-13 Data for Identifying the ...
Machine Learning Regression Analysis of EDX 2012-13 Data for Identifying the ...IJITE
 
6317ijite01
6317ijite016317ijite01
6317ijite01IJITE
 
Mat120 syllabus
Mat120 syllabusMat120 syllabus
Mat120 syllabuschellc14
 
University Ranking Variable Analysis
University Ranking Variable AnalysisUniversity Ranking Variable Analysis
University Ranking Variable AnalysisAlexa Chesser
 
Data Clustering in Education for Students
Data Clustering in Education for StudentsData Clustering in Education for Students
Data Clustering in Education for StudentsIRJET Journal
 

Similar to Students' Performance in Engineering Math Courses (20)

Students’ satisfaction with service quality
Students’ satisfaction with service quality Students’ satisfaction with service quality
Students’ satisfaction with service quality
 
Grading sh-learners
Grading sh-learnersGrading sh-learners
Grading sh-learners
 
Grading sh-learners
Grading sh-learnersGrading sh-learners
Grading sh-learners
 
IRJET- Effectiveness of Constructivist Instructional Approach on Achievem...
IRJET-  	  Effectiveness of Constructivist Instructional Approach on Achievem...IRJET-  	  Effectiveness of Constructivist Instructional Approach on Achievem...
IRJET- Effectiveness of Constructivist Instructional Approach on Achievem...
 
Correlations of Students’ Academic Achievement in Mathematics with Their Erro...
Correlations of Students’ Academic Achievement in Mathematics with Their Erro...Correlations of Students’ Academic Achievement in Mathematics with Their Erro...
Correlations of Students’ Academic Achievement in Mathematics with Their Erro...
 
An empirical study on skewness of test scores of a management subject in an a...
An empirical study on skewness of test scores of a management subject in an a...An empirical study on skewness of test scores of a management subject in an a...
An empirical study on skewness of test scores of a management subject in an a...
 
DISCUSSION ON THE TALENT TRAINING OF UNIVERSITIES WITH INDUSTRY CHARACTERISTI...
DISCUSSION ON THE TALENT TRAINING OF UNIVERSITIES WITH INDUSTRY CHARACTERISTI...DISCUSSION ON THE TALENT TRAINING OF UNIVERSITIES WITH INDUSTRY CHARACTERISTI...
DISCUSSION ON THE TALENT TRAINING OF UNIVERSITIES WITH INDUSTRY CHARACTERISTI...
 
Regression techniques to study the student performance in post graduate exam...
Regression techniques to study the student performance in post  graduate exam...Regression techniques to study the student performance in post  graduate exam...
Regression techniques to study the student performance in post graduate exam...
 
Didactic analysis of the items proposed in the competition test of entry to t...
Didactic analysis of the items proposed in the competition test of entry to t...Didactic analysis of the items proposed in the competition test of entry to t...
Didactic analysis of the items proposed in the competition test of entry to t...
 
Didactic analysis of the items proposed in the competition test of entry to t...
Didactic analysis of the items proposed in the competition test of entry to t...Didactic analysis of the items proposed in the competition test of entry to t...
Didactic analysis of the items proposed in the competition test of entry to t...
 
QUANTIFYING THE THEORY VS. PROGRAMMING DISPARITY USING SPECTRAL BIPARTIVITY A...
QUANTIFYING THE THEORY VS. PROGRAMMING DISPARITY USING SPECTRAL BIPARTIVITY A...QUANTIFYING THE THEORY VS. PROGRAMMING DISPARITY USING SPECTRAL BIPARTIVITY A...
QUANTIFYING THE THEORY VS. PROGRAMMING DISPARITY USING SPECTRAL BIPARTIVITY A...
 
Quantifying the Theory Vs. Programming Disparity using Spectral Bipartivity A...
Quantifying the Theory Vs. Programming Disparity using Spectral Bipartivity A...Quantifying the Theory Vs. Programming Disparity using Spectral Bipartivity A...
Quantifying the Theory Vs. Programming Disparity using Spectral Bipartivity A...
 
Machine Learning Regression Analysis of EDX 2012-13 Data for Identifying the ...
Machine Learning Regression Analysis of EDX 2012-13 Data for Identifying the ...Machine Learning Regression Analysis of EDX 2012-13 Data for Identifying the ...
Machine Learning Regression Analysis of EDX 2012-13 Data for Identifying the ...
 
Grds conferences icst and icbelsh (2)
Grds conferences icst and icbelsh (2)Grds conferences icst and icbelsh (2)
Grds conferences icst and icbelsh (2)
 
6317ijite01
6317ijite016317ijite01
6317ijite01
 
Mat120 syllabus
Mat120 syllabusMat120 syllabus
Mat120 syllabus
 
A Mini Research
A Mini ResearchA Mini Research
A Mini Research
 
University Ranking Variable Analysis
University Ranking Variable AnalysisUniversity Ranking Variable Analysis
University Ranking Variable Analysis
 
Data Clustering in Education for Students
Data Clustering in Education for StudentsData Clustering in Education for Students
Data Clustering in Education for Students
 
Presentation2 bucks-1
Presentation2 bucks-1Presentation2 bucks-1
Presentation2 bucks-1
 

Students' Performance in Engineering Math Courses

  • 1. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Special Issue on UKM Teaching and Learning Congress 2013, June (2015) 91 - 90 © School of Engineering, Taylor’s University 91 Peer-review under responsibility of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE IN ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS COURSES: VECTOR CALCULUS VERSUS DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS F. M. HAMZAH*, P. S. D. KAMARULZAMAN, N. A. ISMAIL, K. JAFAR Centre for Engineering Education Research, The Fundamental Studies of Engineering Unit, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia,43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia *Corresponding Author: kagba2006@gmail.com Abstract Students’ performance can be evaluated through final exam results consist of students’ assignment, quizzes, e-learning tutorial and mid-semester exam. In engineering, mathematics is one of the important course students should dominated especially in Differential Equation (DE) course. However, students should have deep understanding of some important topics covered in Vector Calculus (VC) at early stage such as Integration, Differentiation and Series before they taken the DE course. This article attempts to explore students' performance and correlation between two mathematics courses, VC and DE among engineering students. A study is carried out on student’s results data which consisted of 205 engineering students from four different departments; Department of Civil and Structural Engineering (JKAS), Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering (JKMB), Department of Chemical and Process Engineering (JKKP) and Department of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering (JKEES). The results, which are verified by using paired t- test and Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, indicated that VC and DE courses are related and have positive linear relationship. Keywords: Students’ performance, Grades, Vector calculus, Differential equations. 1. Introduction Mathematics is an expression of the human mind reflects the active will, the contemplative reason, and the desire for aesthetic perfection which the basic
  • 2. Students’ Performance In Engineering Mathematics Courses: Vectors . . . . 92 Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Special Issue 2 6/2015 elements are logic and intuition, analysis and construction, generality and individuality [1]. According to Fennema and Sherman [2], Mathematics is used and studied in courses other than mathematics such as computing, chemistry and physics. Mathematical courses are widely used in almost all educational institutions. Engineering Mathematics is a fundamental course for all engineering courses at tertiary level typically consisting of Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra and Differential Equations. Students in Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment (FKAB), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) are required to take Vector Calculus (VC) course at first semester and Differential Equations (DE) course for third semester. In engineering, mathematics is one of the important course students should dominated especially in DE course. However, students should have deep understanding of some important topics covered in Vector Calculus (VC) at early stage such as Integration, Differentiation and Series before they taken the DE course. The purposes of this paper are to explore students' performance and correlation between two mathematics courses among engineering students. 2. Methodology A total number of 205 students’ final exam results for two courses VC and DE are used for the data in this study from four different departments which are Department of Civil and Structural Engineering (JKAS), Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering (JKMB), Department of Chemical and Process Engineering (JKKP) and Department of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering (JKEES). Final exam results data consist of students’ assignment, quizzes, e-learning tutorial and mid-semester exam. The data was analysed using Microsoft Office Excel and SPSS (version 18). Analyses included descriptive statistics. A paired t-test and Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient tests was conducted to analyse the results of VC and DE. The score interval for each grade is shown in Table 1. Table 1. Score interval for each grade. Grades Score Interval A 75-100 B 60-74.9 C 45-59.9 D 35-44.9 E 0-34.9 2.1. Paired t-test Typically researchers analyse paired data using the paired t-test, which essentially is a one-sample Student t-test performed on difference scores [3]. It is the most basic statistical test that measures group differences which is appropriately used when the researcher wishes to determine whether two groups, as defined by the independent variable, differ on the basis of a selected dependent variable [4, 5]. Andrew et al. [5] Also states that the t-test allows a researcher to compare a
  • 3. 93 F. M. Hamzah et al. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Special Issue 2 6/2015 categorical independent variable with two groups on the basis of an interval or ratio-scaled dependent variable specifically. The t-test for two dependent groups is used to compare the mean of the two data sets obtained from the same sample. Two hypotheses tested are as follows: 0H : There are no significant differences between VC and DE final exam results 1H : There are significant differences between VC and DE final exam results If p-value 05.0=< α , 0H is rejected and shows that there are significant differences between the mean of VC and DE final exam results. A paired t-test is used to calculate differences of group by examining the means of the groups [6]. The difference between the means of the groups is divided by the standard error of the difference. The variance is simply the square of the standard deviation. This calculation results in a t-value, which can be referred in table of significance to test for a significant difference between the groups. Fortunately, in this paper, we can use SPSS to automate this process. The formula for the test statistics for paired differences is ˮ = (1) where = Mean of the paired differences ˤ = Difference in the means J = Standard deviation of the difference J = Number of sample size 2.2. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient test is used to measure the existence of a linear relationship between two variables. There are three types of linear relationship that may exist between these two variables namely positive linear correlation, negative linear correlation and no correlation. This can be tested by using these two hypotheses: 0H : There is no linear relationship between VC and DE 1H : There is a linear relationship between VC and DE When p-value 0.05α = (95% level of confidence), then 0H is rejected and show that there is a significant linear relationship between VC and DE. The strength of these variables can be seen by the value of the correlation coefficient. In addition, correlation coefficient for each department is also has been investigated. This is a measure of the strength and direction of the linear relationship between the two variables [7]. This is the correlation coefficient of the pair of variables indicated. The correlation coefficient can range from -1 to +1, with -1 indicating a perfect negative correlation, +1 indicating a perfect positive
  • 4. Students’ Performance In Engineering Mathematics Courses: Vectors . . . . 94 Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Special Issue 2 6/2015 correlation, and 0 indicating no correlation at all. A variable correlated with it will always have a correlation coefficient of 1. 3. Results and Discussion Based on Fig. 1, the pie chart shows the percentage of students for each department JKAS, JKMB, JKKP and JKEES. JKKP and JKEES shows the highest number of students with the same percentage of 27.8, followed by JKAS with the percentage of 22.9 and the lowest percentage is 21.5 for JKMB. Fig. 1. Distribution of engineering students by department. Figure 2 shows the distribution of students for VC and DE according to each grade. The bar chart shows there is high number of difference which is almost half who get grade A, B, C and D for the two courses. In particular, the number of students who get grades A and B in DE are higher than VC and the numbers of students who get grades C and D in DE are smaller than VC. Obviously, none of the students fail in DE (grade E) course compare to VC. Fig. 2. Distribution of students for VC and DE courses by grade. Figure 3 shows the comparison of grades for VC and DE courses according to departments. The bar chart shows for all departments JKAS, JKMB, JKKP and JKEES produces same results as increasing number of students get grades A, and B and decreasing number of students get grades C and D for DE compare with VC course. It is also found that none of the students get grade D in DE for JKAS and JKKP compare to VC. Surprisingly, there are no students fails (grade E) in these two courses for all departments except for JKEES.
  • 5. 95 F. M. Hamzah et al. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Special Issue 2 6/2015 Fig. 3. Distribution of students for vector calculus and differential equations courses by departments. Table 2 indicates the results for paired samples t-test and Pearson product- moment correlation coefficient of the pair variables VC and DE. The t-test statistics is -22.077 and the corresponding two-tailed p-value is 0.000 which is less than level of significance (α) 0.05. Therefore, we can conclude that there is significance difference in final exam marks between VC and DE course. The value of mean difference with -12.1560 suggested that mean marks for DE course 1 15 24 77 25 15 0 50 A B C D E No.ofStudents Grades JKAS VC DE 1 19 20 4 15 20 8 1 0 10 20 30 A B C D E No.ofStudents Grades JKMB VC DE 3 12 37 5 18 29 10 0 20 40 A B C D E No.ofStudents Grades JKKP VC DE 2 13 31 9 2 12 35 9 1 0 20 40 A B C D E No.ofStudents Grades JKEES VC DE
  • 6. Students’ Performance In Engineering Mathematics Courses: Vectors . . . . 96 Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Special Issue 2 6/2015 is greater than VC course. The value of the Pearson correlation of 0.714 and p- value is less than 0.05 imply there is significant strong positive linear relationship between VC and DE. The positive value of the correlation means that students who scored high on the VC course tend to score high on the DE course. Table 2. Paired Samples t-Test and Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. Courses N Mean difference t-test Pearson Correlation, r Sig. (p- value) VC-DE 205 -12.1560 -22.077 0.714 0.000 Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient of the pair variables VC and DE for each department is shown in Table 3. Generally, the Pearson correlation for each department more than 0.6 and p-value is less than 0.05 but the highest value of Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient of 0.745 which is JKAS whilst the lowest is JKMB imply there is significant strong positive linear relationship between VC and DE. The highest positive value of the correlation from JKEES means that students who scored high on the VC course tend to score high on the DE course compare than other department. Table 3. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient for each department. Department Courses N Pearson Correlation, r Sig. (p-value) JKAS VC-DE 47 0.745 0.000 JKMB VC-DE 44 0.680 0.000 JKKP VC-DE 57 0.732 0.000 JKEES VC-DE 57 0.724 0.000 Based on Table 4, we have found that the corresponding two-tailed p-value for all department is 0.000 which is less than level of significance ( α ) 0.05. Therefore, we can conclude that there is significance difference in final exam marks between VC and DE course for all departments. The value of mean difference with all the negative values suggested that mean marks for DE course is greater than VC course but the highest mean differences is from JKEES whilst the lowest is from JKAS. Table 4. Paired Samples t-Test for each department. Department Mean Difference SD Difference t-test Sig (p-value) JKAS -9.63830 7.05083 -9.372 0.000 JKMB -10.93182 8.40652 -8.626 0.000 JKKP -13.42105 7.32156 -13.839 0.000 JKEES -13.91228 8.15099 -12.886 0.000
  • 7. 97 F. M. Hamzah et al. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Special Issue 2 6/2015 4. Conclusion An analysis on students’ performance based on their final exam results in two Engineering Mathematics courses: Vector Calculus (VC) and Differential Equations (DE) were conducted. Based on analysis and results, the t-test and Pearson correlation shows that VC and DE courses are related and have positive linear relationship. The main reason of the correlation of these two courses is topics covered in VC such as Integration and Differentiation are the basic knowledge students have to know in order to learn DE. This shows that students have to take VC course before they proceed to the DE course. As conclusion, VC is important as preparatory course for DE course. Acknowledgement This is a collaboration research between Centre for Engineering Education Research (www.ukm.my/p3k), and Unit of Fundamental Engineering Studies. The authors would like to thank the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia for supporting this work via research grants, GGPM-2012-075 and PTS-2014-036 respectively in the effort of improving the quality of teaching and learning in engineering education. References 1. Courant, R.; and Robbins, H. (1996). What is Mathematics? An elementary approach to ideas and methods. Oxford University Press. 2. Fennema, E.; and Sherman, J. (1977). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization and affective factors. American Educational Research Journal, 14(1), 51-71. 3. Zimmerman, D. W. (1997). Teacher’s corner: A note on interpretation of the paired-samples t test. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22(3), 349-360. 4. King, M. R.; and Mody, N. A. (2010). Numerical and statistical methods for bioengineering: applications in MATLAB. Cambridge University Press. 5. Andrew, D. P.; Pedersen, P. M.; and McEvoy, C. D. (2011). Research methods and design in sport management. Human Kinetics. 6. Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. McGraw-Hill International. 7. Bui, Y. N. (2013). How to write a master's thesis. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.