Overview The Midterm Paper is worth 100 points. It will consist of a 1-2 page written description and analysis of a work of art using terminology from Chapters 2-5. You will find an outline of the terminology to follow in the Midterm Paper Outline .  This is an assignment to help you recognize visual elements and principles of design in works of art. For this assignment, you are to discuss the form, content, and subject matter of a work of art and how they relate to each other. This is not a research paper, you will not need to do additional research. This paper is about looking and seeing, and is based on your observations of the visual elements and principles of design from Chapters 3 and 4, Style in Chapter 5, and the discussion of the relationship between form and content from Chapter 2.  Requirements Select a work of art: Select ONE of the following listed works of art. Analysis papers submitted using a work of art other than one of those listed will not be accepted. The Approach of Krishna . c. 1600 - 1670. Pahari region, India. Basophil style. Fig. 18.10, pg. 309. Thomas Cole. The Oxbow . 1836. Fig. 21.6, pg. 365. Vincent van Gogh. The Sower . 1888. Fig. 21.29, pg. 384. Pablo Picasso. Violin, Fruit, and Wineglass . 1913. Fig. 22.17, pg. 403. Diego Rivera. The Liberation of the Peon . 1931. Fig. 23.18, pg. 423. Any paper submitted that does not analyze one of the works listed above will be returned for re-submission. Introduction: In the first paragraph, called the introduction, you will include: An identification of the work of art you selected: The name of the artist, title (which is underlined or italicized every time you use the title in your paper), date, and medium. Your initial interpretation of the subject - what is this piece about? A very brief visual description of the work. Thesis statement - usually the last line or so of your first paragraph clarifying the type of paper you are writing. What is this assignment, therefore your paper, about? Description: Your formal analysis should include a description of the piece using terminology (Visual Elements and Principles of Design in the order they are listed in the outline provided), and details of the work that have led you to come to some understanding of what the artist is communicating. Your analysis should have a sense of order, moving purposefully through your description, from one term to the next, with regard to each specific element. How do the visual elements and principles of design work within the work of art to create the meaning you are addressing? Remember that your analysis should not be just a mechanical, physical description. Please use descriptive language and adjectives to describe your work. To aid in writing a formal analysis, you should think as if you were describing the work of art to someone who has never seen it before. What do you see? When your reader finishes reading your analysis, she/he should have a complete mental picture of what the work lo.

1. Overview
The Midterm Paper is worth 100 points. It will consist of a 1-2
page written description and analysis of a work of art using
terminology from Chapters 2-5. You will find an outline of the
terminology to follow in the
Midterm Paper Outline
.
This is an assignment to help you recognize visual elements and
principles of design in works of art. For this assignment, you
are to discuss the form, content, and subject matter of a work of
art and how they relate to each other.
This is not a research paper, you will not need to do additional
research. This paper is about looking and seeing, and is based
on your observations of the visual elements and principles of
design from Chapters 3 and 4, Style in Chapter 5, and the
discussion of the relationship between form and content from
Chapter 2.
Requirements
Select a work of art:
Select ONE of the following listed works of art. Analysis papers
submitted using a work of art other than one of those listed will
not be accepted.
The Approach of Krishna
. c. 1600 - 1670. Pahari region, India. Basophil style. Fig.
18.10, pg. 309.
Thomas Cole.
The Oxbow
. 1836. Fig. 21.6, pg. 365.
Vincent van Gogh.
The Sower
. 1888. Fig. 21.29, pg. 384.
Pablo Picasso.
Violin, Fruit, and Wineglass
. 1913. Fig. 22.17, pg. 403.
Diego Rivera.

2. The Liberation of the Peon
. 1931. Fig. 23.18, pg. 423.
Any paper submitted that does not analyze one of the works
listed above will be returned for re-submission.
Introduction:
In the first paragraph, called the introduction, you will include:
An identification of the work of art you selected: The name of
the artist, title (which is underlined or italicized every time you
use the title in your paper), date, and medium.
Your initial interpretation of the subject - what is this piece
about?
A very brief visual description of the work.
Thesis statement - usually the last line or so of your first
paragraph clarifying the type of paper you are writing. What is
this assignment, therefore your paper, about?
Description:
Your formal analysis should include a description of the piece
using terminology (Visual Elements and Principles of Design in
the order they are listed in the outline provided), and details of
the work that have led you to come to some understanding of
what the artist is communicating. Your analysis should have a
sense of order, moving purposefully through your description,
from one term to the next, with regard to each specific element.
How do the visual elements and principles of design work
within the work of art to create the meaning you are addressing?
Remember that your analysis should not be just a mechanical,
physical description. Please use descriptive language and
adjectives to describe your work.
To aid in writing a formal analysis, you should think as if you
were describing the work of art to someone who has never seen
it before. What do you see? When your reader finishes reading
your analysis, she/he should have a complete mental picture of
what the work looks like. This section is the most important
part of this assignment.
Conclusion:
Your conclusion should consist of a restatement of your thesis

3. and your initial response to the piece. After your analysis, has
your initial interpretation of the meaning changed? If so, in
what way? If not, how has your analysis reinforced your initial
interpretation?
Midterm Paper Outline
Follow the outlined list of terms below to help in your analysis.
Address each - in the order they are listed - and simply fill in
your response to how each is used in the piece. Each term you
are required to address is in bold type. The additional
information included in the outline is there to help you with
your observations. Remember, this is an exercise in looking,
seeing, and interpreting what you see, it is not a research paper.
Papers submitted with terms addressed in a random order will
be returned for clarification and reorganization, and considered
late. Additionally, papers submitted analyzing a work not listed
in the rubric will also be returned for re-submission and
considered late.
Visual Elements
Line
: what types of lines do you see in the piece? Provide examples.
Are the outlines (whether perceived or actual) smooth, fuzzy,
clear? Are the main lines vertical, horizontal, diagonal, or
curved, or a combination of any of these? Are the lines jagged
and full of energy? Sketchy? Geometric? Curvilinear? Bold?
Subtle?
Actual and Implied Line - look for both types of lines
Shape
: what types of shapes do you see? Provide examples.
Geometric Shapes
Organic Shapes
Mass:
How is mass implied?
Space:

4. how is the illusion of space created in the piece? How did the
artist convey the idea and illusion of space? What type of
spatial devices are used? What is the relation of the main figure
to the space around it? Are the main figures entirely within the
space (if the artwork is a painting), or are parts of the bodies
cut off by the edge of the artwork? Is the setting illusionistic, as
if one could enter the space of the painting, or is it flat and
more two-dimensional, a space that one could not possibly
enter? Consider the following spatial devices in your analysis:
Two-Dimensional Space
Illusion of Depth - Implied Depth
Overlapping, Diminishing Size, Vertical Placement
Perspective
Linear perspective
Atmospheric or Aerial Perspective
Time and Motion
: are time or motion evident? If so, how are they conveyed?
Implying Motion – if evident, how is it implied?
Actual Motion
Light:
How is the illusion of light created? Are shadows visible? If so,
where? Are there dark shadows, light shadows, or both? How do
the shadows, of present, effect the work?
Seeing Light
Value (or tone)
Implied Light
Chiaroscuro
Strong Value Contrasts
Minimal Value Contrasts
Light as Medium?
Color:
Is color important in the piece? How is it used? What type of
colors are used in the work - bright, dull, complimentary? Does
the artist use colors to draw your attention to specific areas of
the work? If so, how?
Texture

5. : Is texture actual or implied? If a sculpture, is the surface
smooth and polished or rough? Are there several textures
conveyed? Where and How? If a painting, is there any texture to
the paint surface? Are the brushstrokes invisible; visibly
brushy, sketchy, loose and flowing; or tight and controlled?
Principles of Design
Unity and Variety
- How is the piece unified? What elements offer some variety?
Balance
: how is balance created?
Symmetrical Balance or Asymmetrical Balance
Emphasis and Subordination:
what is the focal point?
Emphasis – what is emphasized?
Subordination – what is subordinated?
Directional Forces:
do lines or repeated elements create paths for the eyes to
follow? Directional forces typically direct our eyes to the area
of emphasis.
Contrast
: any variation of value, color, or scale, for example, creates
contrast.
Repetition and Rhythm
- Do elements repeat? If so, describe what is repeating and how
this works in the piece you selected.
Scale and Proportion:
How big is the artwork? Are the figures or objects in the work
life-sized, larger or smaller than life? How does the size affect
the work? Does the whole or even individual parts of the
figure(s) or natural objects in the work look natural? Why did
you come to this conclusion?