Wallboards and workforce politics


Published on

A brief article on wallboard content for call centers. Keep negative agent specific content off of the public wallboard and push it to the agents desktop.

Published in: Business, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Wallboards and workforce politics

  1. 1. Wallboards and workforce politics March 2012At first glance anyone would look at this title and think what does one have to do with the other? In aproperly run call center they would not have anything to do with each other. However, in a call centerthat does not have goals, objectives, and structured agent reviews wallboards and workforce politicshave much to do with each other.A properly run call center works from the top down. Senior management develops a mission for the callcenter with the help from the call center manager. The mission statement will be short clear andconcise. The manager then develops goals for the call center that will be used to meet the missionstatement. Then working with the team leaders the manager will generate objectives for the teamleaders and agents.What all of this has to do with wallboards and workforce politics is this: If you do not have a missionstatement you probably do not have well thought out goals and objectives. When there are no goalsand objectives for the agents in the call center content on the wallboards end up being full of negativecompetitive content. This type of content will create workforce politics.Some examples of wallboard content that is full of workforce politics.1. Displaying agent names that are available when there are calls waiting;2. Listing the agent names and the number of calls taken for the day;3. Displaying the amount of idle time including breaks;4. Displaying the names of bottom producing agents with the any of the following metrics: Adherence,Transfers, AHT, FCR, CSat, absenteeism, Revenue or Service Level.When asked about displaying this type of content some managers claim the competitive nature of theagents helps them when they see how they are ranked. There are many situations that may haveoccurred that caused an agent to be a bottom producer at that moment or even for the day.
  2. 2. Notice how in this real life example (name have been changed) the wallboard shows agents are availableand there calls in queue. The call center can now openly criticize Black and Vennesch about not takingcalls. There could be a real explanation for this situation which is why showing this information cancreate negative situations.On the other hand providing a list of agents that are top producing in almost any categories is anexcellent way to build a positive competitive environment. If the motive and motivation behind the listsare positive and all of the agents see it that way then lists with agent names are acceptable.In this example because most of the data is positive it is acceptable to display the agent names and howthey are producing. When showing positive numbers a friendly competition can be created and makethe call center more enjoyable.Agents already have enough challenges to deal with during the day adding to those challenges negativeand very public feedback only serves to increase the stress level on the agents. Wallboards should beused to generate as much positive information as possible when listing agent names. If the wallboard isshowing poor performance show only group information.This all sounds so easy and normal yet it continues to surprise the Spectrum installation crew thenumber of times workforce politics are added to the wallboard content.Spectrum is a leading provider of Unified Contact Center Reporting. Contact Spectrum today tolearn more about wallboard content.Follow Spectrum Corporation: • SlideShare • LinkedIn
  3. 3. • BlogDan BoehmVP Sales and MarketingSpectrumdan@specorp.com+1 713 986 8839