Legal Issues Surrounding The Death Penalty

Legal Issues Surrounding The Death Penalty
Some legal issues gain importance because they concern basic religious, social and ethical values.
Capital punishment is one of these concerning issues. Most people hold an opinion, pro or con
regarding the death penalty. Many people who favor the death penalty believe that capital
punishment costs less money, reduces the amount of murderers, and fulfills the concept of justice.
On the other hand people who disagree with capital punishment believe that innocent people are
often put to death, it doesn't fix the crime person committed, and it's a cruel punishment. In viewing
both sides of the argument it is clear that the death penalty must be abolished.
The history of the death penalty goes back as far as people can remember. The earliest records ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"The issue moved onto a front burner in July 1997 when Dieter's group published a report claiming
that 69 innocent persons had been freed from death rows since the reinstitution of capital
punishment in the United States in 1976." (Jost) The death penalty can be faulty. Some also say that
there's no point in putting someone to death. Revenge, anger and hate will never cure the sadness of
a lost loved one. They believe that it doesn't change the fact that crime the suspect committed can
never be fixed. What's done is done, and it can't be taken back. Also different types of people like
the mentally ill or juveniles get treated differently when it comes to the death penalty. Sick people
and children should not be executed. The death penalty applies differently towards different people;
For Example the United States has executed more juvenile offenders –– 160 –– than any nation
since 1973. (Cooper) Most who agree with capital punishment follow the old Bible teaching, "An
eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, and a life for a life." Support for the capital punishment is strong
in the U.S. "64% express support for the death penalty" (McCarthy) according to the recent Gallup
Poll. People believe that anyone who takes another's life away deserves to have their life taken.
Many believe that the system serves as a form of justice allowing suspect to "get what they
deserve." Many people think that the families of the victims should be able to see the murderer
suffer just as their loved ones
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg Analysis
Dear Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg,
I am writing to seek for your opinion about capital punishment. Recently, I read a book named Dead
Man Walking written by Sister Helen Prejean. It is about her experiences of witnessing the death
penalty. She shows how complexity it is and drew my attention. While I tried to read in depth of this
issue, I found it is hard to judge which side is better. Opposing or supporting capital punishment
both have their undoubtable arguments.
On the side of opposing death penalty, the value of human rights cannot be ignored. According to
the article of Union Nation, "no one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment or punishment". Everyone has his own rights to survive. The government has no absolute
power to take people lives away. Not by chance, people who judged to be guilty are found to be
innocent. According to the DNA to Clear 200th Person; Pace Picks Up on Exonerations, the
Innocence Project showed that more than two hundred inmates have ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
As Bryan Stevenson, executive director of the Equal Justice Initiative in Alabama, said 95 percent of
the 3,350 people on death row were poor in 2007. People who cannot afford to pay high lawyer fee
have a higher chance to receive the capital punishment. Horace Dunkins, Gary Drinkard and John
Eldon Smith are the examples that were sentenced to death because their lawyers failed their
responsibilities. Dunkins' lawyers failed to show his mentally retarded to prove his non–intention;
Drinkard's lawyer failed to prove that he was unable to murder due to his back injury; Smith's
lawyer lacked of awareness of changing rules. However, in the case of Ethan Couch, he killed four
people and got 10 years' probation with a recommendation for treatment of his "affluenza" only.
Punishment failed to accomplish its purpose. It punished the innocent but leave the criminal away.
This really hesitated me to support death

Morality In Truman Capote's In Cold Blood
Across America a battle of morals rages over the death penalty. Like many other controversial issues
that consume our society, the issue of the death penalty is not easily defined. Some people feel that
one should reap what they sow. However, the issue is more complex than the eye for an eye
standard. With the death penalty in place, our country is stumbling down a twisted path with
numerous complications nationwide.
In this day in age, technology is rapidly redefining acceptable standards. The way our legal system
requires evidence is much more profound as compared to a decade ago. In the past forty two years,
"one hundred and fifty five people have been exonerated from the death penalty" (Innocence).
Technological advances played a significant ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
At times it's difficult to understand why others may do something unspeakable or even
unimaginable. When dealing with a case in which the defendant is suffering from a mental illness, a
different standard must be applied. It is unreasonable to prosecute the mentally ill as if they were
like another convict in their right mind. In the novel In Cold Blood by Truman Capote, Perry Smith
is a man on trial for the murder of a family of four. He is found to have many parallels in his story
that align with other mentally ill people that have committed murder. Perry claims that before he slit
the throat of Mr. Clutter that he "didn't want to hurt the man. [He] thought he was a very nice
gentleman" (Capote 244). However, his mind started to whirl and then things began to blur. He did
not "realize what [he'd] done until [he] heard the sound" (Capote 244). Perry killed Mr. Clutter
without really knowing how or why. What he does remember is thinking of all the people who had
done him wrong in the past and all of "the shame. Disgust. And they'd (his parole officer) told me
not to come back to Kansas" (Capote 244). Perry's condition justifies mitigating consideration for
his

Michael Sattler's Arguments Against Capital Punishment?
Capital punishment, commonly known as the death penalty, has not always been controversial. In
the early 1600s, capital punishment was seen as an absolute option for the punishment of evildoers.
However, over the past century and before the 1600s, scholars have shown strong arguments against
the use of the death penalty as a means of punishment. This paper argues against capital punishment
through the lenses of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and Michael Sattler's
Anabaptist view on the use of violence. This topic will be argued in five sections. Part one briefly
introduces the historical development of the death penalty. Part two introduces a summary of the
UDHR followed by part three, an analysis of capital punishment through ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The declaration has served as a model for many domestic constitutions, laws, regulations, and
policies that are aimed at protecting fundamental human rights (Hannum 145). For the purpose of
this paper, there are three essential aspects of the human rights theory outlined in the UDHR. First,
Article 3 grants all humans the right to life stating, "everyone has the right to life, liberty, and
security of a person." Second, Article 5 states that "no one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel,
inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment." This right to safety alludes to the negative rights of
a human, which grants the moral right that someone remain unharmed or "left alone." Third, the
UDHR argues in favor of the preservation of the human dignity. The document states that an
increased awareness of "dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and
women... have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom"
(The United Nations). The belief of human dignity within this document is strongly influenced by
Kantian ethics, which believes that humans are their own ends, not the means to the end, and
possess intrinsic value (Kant 36). In arguing for human dignity, the UDHR acknowledges the
transcendent value of a human and his or her rights as more than just a body and more as a soul.
Since publication,

Capital Punishment Rhetorical Analysis
Should the Death Penalty still be an option or only life in prison? This is the question at issue that
the writer, Kyle Gibson(Heritage Foundation research fellow for the Center for Data Analysis),
debates in the article, " Death Penalty Repeal: It's necessary to use Capital Punishment in a Free
World". On June 23, 2013 Gibson explains that Capital Punishment is a right and is important in
society. He provides evidence on why Capital Punishment is important and how it is a free right of
all citizens. His purpose is to show readers why the death penalty is important in order to convince
readers to support and not oppose the death penalty.
The author claims that Capital Punishment is a free right and is important in keeping criminals out
of society. His purpose is to show the reasons why the death penalty is important to society and he
does just that! Gibson shares how the death penalty serves justice for the families of the victims and
how its retributive for the victim. Not to mention how Capital Punishment acts as a deterrence.
Through these statements one can't help but be a little persuaded to read on. ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
He relates this to the presence of prison gangs. People want criminals to go to prison so that they are
out of society but Gibson argues that criminals truly aren't due to the fact of prison gangs. Prison
gangs have been behind 50% or more of all murder crimes within state prisons. Not to mention
prison homicides have increased 44% in the past year. He uses this as an example as to why the
death penalty is important. THe author claims that it gets rid of the criminals permanently from
society not just

Michael Sattler's Arguments Against Capital Punishment
Capital punishment, commonly known as the death penalty, has not always been controversial. In
the early 1600s, capital punishment was seen as an absolute option for the punishment of evildoers.
However, the past century and scholars before the 1600s have both shown strong arguments against
the use of the death penalty as a means of punishment. This paper argues against capital punishment
through the lenses of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and Michael Sattler's
anabaptist view on the use of violence. This topic will be argued in five sections. Part one briefly
introduces the historical development of the death penalty. Part two introduces a summary of the
UDHR followed part three, an analysis of capital punishment through this lens. Part four introduces
a summary of Michael Sattler's work as an anabaptist and pacifist followed by part five, an analysis
of capital punishment through his lens. Lastly, these arguments will be concluded with a ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To this Sattler answered that he simply should not accept the position of magistrate; "they wished to
make Christ king, but He fled and did not view it as the arrangement of His Father" (134). In the
modern world, this would translate to the people who hold a position in office. Although common
governments do hold people in high, powerful positions, this does not grant anyone the right to the
power to decide life or death. Sattler emphasizes that while the government's magistracy is
according to the flesh, the Christians is according to the Spirit (135). Therefore, a Christian should
live his life in accord with viewing humans in their full nature. No human should be more powerful
than another in such a sense that he can determine the fate of the other. A Christian's war is against
the devil in which palpable weapons will not suffice, the war is spiritual and a Christian's armor is

The Death Penalty Is Archaic and Immoral Essays
The death penalty is simply a modernized version of the Holy Bible's "an eye for an eye, a tooth for
a tooth, a hand for a hand, a foot for a foot". Some argue that death is a necessary retribution for
murderous cases – but is it effective morally? Revenge only glorifies violence, which is most
definitely not the message the world strives to display. The death penalty is a negative form of
punishment and insinuates a harsh reflection of society economically, politically, and socially. More
than two thirds of the world's countries formally oppose the death penalty, yet only fifteen out of the
fifty United States also object against the decree. What does this say about America? The United
States represents freedom yet braces an ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Dating back to the great words of Voltaire, "It is better to risk saving a guilty person than to
condemn an innocent one." Over 130 people have been exculpated over false convictions since 1730
and the numbers are still growing. When those thirty–five United States prove that they can weed
out the guilty from the innocent confidently and without fail, maybe then they shall obtain the
rationale behind such a serious sanction. Yet as it stands so clumsily today, there is no assurance the
death penalty emits for the future. The death penalty is discriminatory against social and economical
aspects of society. Studies show that starting in 1977, most of those placed on death row are guilty
of killing white victims, and that African– Americans enumerate one third of those executions. The
most evident factor determining execution is the ethnicity of the victim, which is extremely biased,
even if racial hostility is still inextricable to civilization. Not only is the death penalty prejudice, but
it is also exceedingly unfair economically. It's horribly expensive to run executions, and the money
spent on them could be put into more useful areas of interest and even help reduce rates of crime!
Many inmates cannot afford their own attorney, which leaves them with either no lawyer or poor
representation in court to defend them selves. The government has the authorization to ratify the
death penalty in any location inside America, even in states

The Controversy Over The Death Penalty
The controversy over the legal process widely applied in ancient times– the death penalty– has
always intrigued me because of the reasonable stances from both sides on whether it should be legal
or illegal. The dispute goes between the biggest issues of immorality behind the act, if it gives the
best suffering over jail time, and human rights. Personally, I side with illegalization of the capital
punishment, yet can resonate with some of the common legal sided thoughts. A few reasons of why I
believe the death penalty should be illegal begin with my belief of immorality that occurs during the
act of murdering someone. From my perspective, I do not think any human should kill, including the
prison guards. My second stance is my belief that the death penalty does not serve the cause justice
or to give the best form of punishment over the life time of jail sequence. Lastly, I believe in human
rights, and murdering others that have done wrong should not be considered as a human right, in my
opinion. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
That seems hypocritical to me because murder is murder and it is immoral. For my second stance,
my belief does not follow that taking the life of someone who has done wrong gives the best form of
punishment over living the rest of their life locked up in prison to suffer like they deserve. Lastly, I
believe that for human rights, harming others is not a human right, if used in protection, of course,
but not just for revenge. The United Nations General Assembly agrees and recall that it does not
involve human rights to use the death

Abolishing The Death Penalty In The United States
The death penalty continues to be an issue of controversy and is an issue that will be debated and
talked about in the United States for many more years. The death penalty is a punishment of
execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime. In 1963 the United States
abolished the death penalty, also called capital punishment. Through the 1960s, the Supreme Court
battled many cases involving the death penalty and whether it should be allowed. The Supreme
Court finally ruled a decision in 1976 that the death penalty can be enforced by the states that want
it and not enforced by those who don't want it. To me not only is capital punishment unethical,
useless and serves no purpose it is also biased and racist. Racial bias ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In fact, the death penalty will most likely never bring closure to anyone. The death penalty is
supposed to divert their attention to the victim's families and help them heal, provide services but in
most states with the death penalty they don't. It splits up families and causes never– ending pain to
families. Jim O'Brien is one of the many family victims of the death penalty. In this case, his
daughter was murdered by a serial killer and for 8 years O'Brien has been trying to find closure.
Every day he wakes up to questions about a new appeal or a detective on his doorsteps. He wanted
the serial killer to be put on death row but after eight years of trials and more trials, the idea of the
death penalty changed his mind. Instead, the killer got life without parole and that taught O'Brien a
powerful lesson. "I learned the hard way that the death penalty is an albatross over the heads of
victims' families"(O'Brien). A killing for another killing will not bring

The Purpose Of The Death Penalty
The existence of the death penalty is an endlessly controversial issue in the United States justice
system that has that has initiated countless debates for decades. The death penalty is most commonly
carried out by lethal injection and electrocution and as of July, 2015, there are a total of 26 states
that allow the death penalty, 20 that don't, and 4 that have imposed a moratorium on it (Legality of
Capital Punishment in the US, by State). As our country continues to learn through experience and
become wiser, it becomes increasingly evident that it is best that the death penalty be continued.
Reasons for this include deterrence, morality, and that it is constitutional. Essentially, these reasons
are backed with evidence that allows us to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This idea is motivated by the principles of lex talionis, or "an eye for an eye" (Carmical). The death
penalty simply serves to punish a criminal for his or her wrongdoing and there is nothing unjust
about that, nor is it as abolitionists claim it to be, "a means of revenge" (Carmical). Furthermore, the
morality of the death penalty has sparked countless debates as opposers often say that is it simply
wrong to execute someone under any circumstances. However, what would these opposers say to a
case in which an attempted murderer was killed in order to save a victim's life? The death penalty is
just as similar of a scenario as that because once the murderer is put to death, there is no possibility
that this murderer will commit any more crime in the future. Additionally, the death penalty sets a
fine line between common crimes and murders. In The Spirit of the Laws (1750), famous political
philosopher and lawyer, Montesquieu, wrote: "It is a great abuse among us to condemn the same
punishment a person what only robs on the highway and another who robs and murders. Surely, for
the sake of public security, some difference should be made in the punishment" (Tucker). What
Montesquieu wrote is an obvious yet disregarded point to the death penalty and why it should still
be used. There is an undeniable difference between the crime of robbery and the crime of

Death Penalty Argumentative Analysis
The death penalty has become an extremely controversial topic as of recently, especially in the
United States. This is mainly because of the many horrid attacks and mass murders that
United States citizens have become victim to. Terrorists that commit these crimes typically face
serious consequences for their actions, most oftenly capital punishment. The death penalty has
become so controversial because people are torn on whether or not it is morally correct to control
when an individual's life is to be terminated and by what means. The Case for Mercy: Some of the
Unlikeliest People Oppose the Death Penalty is an article written by Erik Gunn that discusses the
controversy concerning the death penalty. The author takes a clear and definite stance ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
In February of 2014, the body of ten–year–old Hailey Owens was found wrapped in garbage bags in
a plastic tote. After further analysis, it was concluded that her abductor had shot and raped her
before attempting to hide her body. Stacy Barfield, Hailey's mother, requested that her daughter's
killer be sentenced to life in prison rather than face execution. Barfield wrote the prosecuting
attorney to request
"Mercy for [her], for [her] family, and for the memory of [her] daughter, Hailey Owens" (Gunn,
p.1). She claimed that sentencing Craig Wood, her own daughter's killer, to life in prison would
bring more ease to her family than execution. The case concerning Hailey Owens is not as unique as
one would think. Several others who have control over the fate of a criminal opt for the convict to
face a life sentence for reasons including their religion, practical concerns (like
Critical Analysis
4
Barfield), concerns about the execution of the wrongfully convicted, or simply just compassion.
After discussion of these reasons and expansion to include stories and interviews involving each, the
article discusses statistics concerning the popularity of the death penalty across the

The Fifth Amendment And The Rights During Arrest, Trial,...
No matter what the crime is, the Constitution is supposed to help protect the accused's rights during
arrest, trial, and sentencing. The Sixth Amendment clearly states that "In all criminal prosecutions,
the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and
district wherein the crime shall have been committed... and to have the assistance of counsel for his
defense". If the accused is found to be guilty, the Eighth Amendment is there to protect us from the
possibility of cruel and unusual punishment. This is something as an American we all expect and we
all assume is what happens, but what if you're a minority, or have a mental impairment and you're
facing the death penalty, can you expect the same rights? Recent studies have shown that while the
use of the death penalty have gone down over the years since it was reinstated in 1976, there is still
a staggering number of statics showing inequality in the application of its use. A law professor from
the University of Iowa, David C. Baldus and two colleagues published a study not long after the
reinstatement of the death penalty in 1976 (Dow, 2011). In this study it looked at over 2,000
homicide cases just within Georgia alone beginning in 1972, what they found was startling (Dow,
2011). Baldus found that black defendants were 1.7 times more likely to be given the death penalty
than white defendants and those who murdered white victims were actually 4.3 times more apt to be

Death Penalty Decline
Also "offenders aged fifteen and younger at the time of their crimes was unconstitutional"
("introduction to the death penalty"). This shows that there are many factors that prevent a person
from getting the death penalty and these limitations protects them from it. In recent years, "the
United States numbers of death sentences are steadily declining from 300 in 1998 to 106 in 2009"
("introduction to the death penalty"). This shows that the usage of the death penalty is declining and
many people are not being punished with the death penalty. This also shows that the death penalty is
still being used in certain crimes in the United States. This is showing that the death penalty might
not be used as much in the future.
There are many ways that

Relativism Death Sentencing Analysis
Relativism and Death Sentencing In 2013 a news headline advised that the death penalty in the
United States was gradually declining. A shortage of lethal injection chemicals has contributed to
declining the use of capital punishment in the United States with a new report stating there had only
been 39 executions that year (cnn.com)". Going back into the past when there were several other
methods that were offered for prisoners on death row i.e. electrocution, gas chamber, hanging to a
firing squad the main problem with the decline right now is chemical shortage and to top it off some
of the chemical injections what were given were not even do the job correctly. A lot of the articles
that are being distributed talk about the same thing ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
About two thirds of the countries around the world have abolished capital punishment in law or in
practice on the grounds that it really isn't effective to crime (opposingviews.com). But a 2008
comprehensive review of capital punishment research since 1975 by Drexel University economist
Bijou Yang and psychologist David Lester of Richard Stockton College of New Jersey concluded
that the majority of studies that track effects over many years and across states or counties find a
deterrent effect (usnews.com). Relativism is in which a moral or ethical proposition does not reflect
on universal or objective truth, but instead makes a claim in relation to circumstance. Death is not
right in any aspect that it is put in but we the people should not be in the position to determine
someone's fate even if that person chose to determine someone else's. Why do we kill people who
kill people to show that killing people is wrong? It is murder only spelled different. One of the Anti–
Death Penalty organization support

Socrates Essay
Socrates Socrates spent his time questioning people about things like virtue, justice, piety and truth.
The people Socrates questioned are the people that condemned him to death. Socrates was sentenced
to death because people did not like him and they wanted to shut him up for good. There was not
any real evidence against Socrates to prove the accusations against him. Socrates was condemned
for three major reasons: he told important people exactly what he thought of them, he questioned
ideas that had long been the norm, the youth copied his style of questioning for fun, making
Athenians think Socrates was teaching the youth to be rebellious. But these reasons were not the
charges against him, he was charged with being an atheist and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Socrates traveled from one group to another visiting wise politicians, poets, and craftsmen, making
enemies out of each group. After talking to the "wise" men Socrates realized they were all arrogant
for thinking themselves wise. Because Socrates knew he was not wise he believed he was better off
then them. In the end it was a representative from each group that charged Socrates with the crimes
that got him condemned to death. This "occupation" consumed his leisure as well as his finances.
Socrates told the court at his trail: "I live in great poverty because of my service to the god"(6).
Socrates compared himself to a gadfly, and the city of Athens a steed he was just trying to stir into
life (11). When a horsefly bites me I squash it, and that is exactly what the city of Athens did to
Socrates. Instead of squashing him they made him drink poison, a little bit less messy. Socrates was
a gadfly by questioning Athenians on subjects they rarely talked about, making them think about
something they normally wouldn't. He did his questioning out in the open where Athenians
congregated so the public could observe and hopefully think on whatever subject that was being
talked about. Socrates would question respectable Athenians making them look stupid too a crowd,
because they would not know what to say. Making the person being questioned very angry towards
Socrates for putting them in such a position. Socrates

Abolishing The Death Penalty In The United States
There is a topic that lingers in today's society "The death penalty" which has been around since the
1800's hundreds. The death penalty still remains as a controversial issue in society. In the last sixty
years, there has been numerous and many polls that has been carried out to determine the amount of
support that the death penalty has. There has been many abolitionists that have made it known to
others that the death penalty should be abolished in the US for decades. America has always been
threatened with terrorist attacks, such event that has occurred in September 11, also the distribution
of virus that was known to be deadly, and also random attacks by dangerous people from across the
country. Due to these attacks there has been an outrage, a moral outrage, also there are new debates
on whether to use or to abolish the death penalty as a way to stop criminals from committing crimes.
There has been thousands of innocent people that have lost their lives due to terror attacks. There
has been a rise on rape and murder due to these criminal behaviors. The victim's family members are
left with anger and hurt and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Some people are certain that someday these vicious criminal sentenced to life imprisonment will be
released (Unnever 169). The cycle of preying on innocent citizens will continue, and this should be
avoided by all means possible. Executing violent and dangerous offenders enable the society to
make sure that such individuals do not harm other people in the future. Death penalty eliminates any
possibility of convicted criminals returning to the society (Unnever 169). Most of the offenders have
a high risk of returning to committing crimes once they are released. The death penalty is real
punishments that will make the criminal to pay proportionately for the offense they

Texas Death Penalty Research Paper
Immigration continues to grow through out Texas and so does politicians, however despite the
growing population and growing supporters for Republicans, the death penalty does not. The death
penalty has taken the lives of many criminals but does not continue to do so. Through out the nation,
the death penalty has been a wide debated topic on whether or not it is in violation of the eighth
amendment and also has been considered cruel and unusual punishment. Texas, among other states,
has used and continues to use the death penalty costing taxpayers millions. The death penalty is
cruel and usual punishment and is costing taxpayers millions of dollars.
The Death penalty was re–instituted in the United States with the 1976 Gregg v. Georgia decision

The Stranger By Albert Camus
Albert Camus's novel "The Stranger" revolves around a young man estranged from society. This
man, Monsieur Meursault, lives the majority of his life fulfilling his own physical needs and social
obligations, but has little emotional connection to the world around him. Throughout the book
Meursault attends his mother's funeral, begins a serious relationship with his former co–worker
Marie, kills a man without motive, goes through trial, and is sentenced for execution. His lack of
emotional response to these major life events causes a general mistrust from the people around him.
In part one, before he commits murder, the impression he makes on others does not affect him much,
but this is not true for the second half of the book. Though he was ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
When one of his mother's closest friends stops sobbing, Meursault is glad "finally shut up" instead
of having any sympathy for a mourning woman. This shows how insensitive Meursault can be in a
time in which most people would be too sad to get upset over such natural behavior. In this way, the
mourning friends are used as a comparison between Meursault and the majority of society in this
sense, and as portrayed here, Meursault appears to be the lesser of the two. Though Meursault
asserts that he loved his mother in her life and tried to take the best care of her that he could provide
when she lived with him, once she dies he immediately accepts that she is gone. This is technically a
rational way to react, as mourning does bring back loved ones and therefore is pointless, but few
people can actually manage to forget about their loved one so quickly. It can be assumed that
Meursault feels the same way about the death of his mother as he does the possible death of his
girlfriend Marie, that he would not be "interested in her dead," meaning that if she were gone, he
would be able to move on since she no longer plays a role in his life. He may still have had strong
feelings for his mother just as he does for Marie, but he bases the feelings he has off of how much of
a role these people play in his life. This idea is consistent with the existential view that the only
thing that matters is the here and now of life and not the past or

Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Death Penalty
For any good argument to be made you need both an opposition and proponent stance. The
oppositions views on the death penalty is that it should not be abolished and its main purpose is to
make to criminals suffer, just as there victims did and gives the ultimate just punishment for their
crimes. One oppositions views of the death penalty is as followed, "Why should a serial killer live
when his victims cannot" (Dobbs). Though this thought can be an understood one, the facts on
morals re appear. Appoints of abolishing the death penalty believe that morals went out the door
when the person committed the crime. They believe that since it was morally wrong for someone to
say take another's life, that that person does not deserve to have their

Meursault Quotes
"But everybody knows life isn't worth living. Deep down I knew perfectly well that it doesn't much
matter whether you die at thirty or at seventy, since either case other men and women will naturally
go on living– and for thousands of years. In fact, nothing could be clearer. Whether it was now or
twenty years from now, I would still be the one dying." (Page 114, Chapter 5)
My favorite quote from the book, it sums up really who Meursault is as person and what his take is
on life. He pretty much is saying that essence doesn't matter one bit to him, and shouldn't matter to
anyone, because in the end we're all dying, some sooner than others. We all have the same starting
point between a woman legs, but we all have our different ending. Meursault is saying that your
actions don't really matter and what you do with your life or in your life won't change anything for
you at all, you're going to die and you have to live with that, so what's the point of doing well and
making right choices to help others.
That's what they're more concerned about in the court, they're trying to find out how could one could
be so dead inside and live without a care in life. To me, I think they believe they sort cared about the
Arab because they're trying to figure out how could he be okay with his action, why is he so easy
and on taking the death penalty. What is the reason that caused him to be like this, and maybe him
killing ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Something did snap in him, because why out of all the people? Why not tell the court, tell his
girlfriend, but he tells a priest who didn't even want to waste his last minutes with talking about
God. I guess the fact that he was ready to die and just to be done, hit him then and there and he was
ready to go without a care of essence ever in his

The Murder Of Mr. Adams
On November 27th, 1976 Mr. Adams' car ran out of fuel and he was forced to walk to the nearest
gas station (Radelet, 2011). Shortly after this Mr. Adams was given a ride by local teenager David
Ray Harris, who was driving a stolen vehicle. The two then spent the day together, even going to see
a drive in movie. That night Mr. Adams returned to a motel where he was staying. Mr. Harris, now
alone, was stopped by Officer Wood and his Partner Teresa Turko shortly after midnight. Officer
Wood was shot and killed by Harris, who sped off too quickly for Officer Turko to get a plate
number or a good look at the shooter. Directly after this Mr. Harris drove home and for the next few
days, bragged to his friends that he offed a pig. Police questioned Harris upon learning of these
statements. Harris however, feigned innocence, stating that he did not kill a cop and that he was just
trying to impress his friends. Mr. Harris unfortunately pointed the finger at a hitchhiker that he had
picked up, Mr. Adams. Police took Adams in for questioning, where he denied everything, but he
did detail the events of the previous day. Mr. Adams was informed by the police that he had failed a
lie detection test and that Harris had passed, but Adams still held that he was innocent. At this time
the only actual evidence implicating Adams in the crime is the testimony that Harris gave to the
police. During Adams ' trial at the Dallas District court, Turko testified that the driver had the same
color

Poem Analysis: Bali Nine
Language Analysis– 'Bali Nine: Why I won't be lighting a candle for Myuran Sukumaran and
Andrew Chan'
The author of the opinion piece: 'Bali nine: Why I won't be lighting a candle for Myuran Sukumaran
and Andrew Chan', Garry Linnell, co–presenter of the Breakfast program on 2UE, uses a strong
passionate tone to argue that both Myuran Sukumaran and Andrew Chan deserve the death penalty
as they 'knew the penalty if they were caught' claiming that the 'poster boys' had made 'stupid, self–
indulgent' mistakes.
Linnell reveals background information about the issue, as Artist Ben Quilty and several other
prominent Australians 'gather in Martin Place' to 'shine a light' against the 'growing shadow'. Linnell
suggests that the act of 'lighting a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He then states that the Bali nine had 'flouted' the 'sovereign rights and penalties' suggesting that they
openly disregarded them without any regret. Following this, he provides rough statistics about the
consequences that would follow: 'hundreds, if not thousands, of lives would have been affected.'
Linnell supports these statistics by providing a visual image showing both the Chan and Sukumaran
family supporting each other. By providing the reader with this image, the author provokes the
audience with fear that although the family is sticking together, 'affected lives' would consequently
be pulled apart. The author provides the reader with rhetorical questions relating to the context,
questioning whether Sukumaran and Chan would '...have gone on to lead simple lives filled with
redemption and remorse...' Contrasting this, he questions whether they would have, like so many
others, 'bought themselves a flashy home... drive a flashy car' and 'expunge from their mind the
damage their deeds may have caused so many others' and instead would go on to 'reap' the benefits
in awe of how they got away with 'such a ridiculous get–rich–quick scheme'. In this argument,
Linnell depicts the two ringleaders as people who would have reaped the benefits, oblivious and
blind to their own 'damaging deeds' if they had gotten away and not received the death penalty. This
causes the reader to feel more inclined to believing that Sukumaran and Chan should receive the
death penalty as they deserved it from their damaging actions, and do not deserve to 'reap the
benefits' that others have suffered from, therefore agreeing to the author's

Bali Nine Persuasive Speech
Hello
As most of you might already know, I'm Fardowsa Haji and today I'm going to be talking about the
infamous death penalty and why the two Australian Bali Nine ringleaders should not be executed.
A wise man once said, "If we believe that murder is wrong and not admissible in our society, then it
has to be wrong for everyone, not just individuals but governments as well." As most of us already
know Andrew Chan and Myuran sukumaran were arrested in 2005 for attempting to smuggle 8 kg of
heroin form Indonesia to Australia. And then we might think, that the Australian government would
prosecute these two Australian men. But no, they are sentenced to death in Indonesia. Thesis that is
causing the most controversy is the fact that these two Australian men are being executed in a
country they're not ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While some might believe that pushing them for the crime they have committed is fair, others feel
that prosecuting them in a harsh manner will result in a negative relationship between the two
countries. I believe that the Bali nine ringleaders should not be executed because of the fact that they
have used jail as a form of rehabilitation and changed their ways and because execution is extremely
inhumane. There are other alternatives.
I have several reasons for thinking this, my first being the time they have spent in jail. They were
arrested on the 17th of April 2005 and fund guilty of the charges on the 14th of February 2006. But
the prosecutors called for the death penalty on the 24th of January 2006, way before they were
found guilty. The prosecutors were willing to put these two to death before it was even confirmed
that they were guilty. Doesn't that seem a little wrong? Chan and Sukumaran spent ten years in
prison and they have shown genuine remorse and greatly rehabilitated. Sukumaran taught English,
computer, graphic design and philosophy classes to prisoners and he pushed

Thesis About The Death Penalty
Abadir 1
Sandra Abadir
English 101
Professor Lace
July 8, 2015
Proposal
My essay is going to be about the death penalty. The thesis that I have for now is "The death penalty
should be legalized in the United States." The death penalty is sentencing one to death. Crimes that
deserve such a punishment are called capital crimes. I will be using some of the following sources:
the Huffington post's article "Execution and the Supreme Court: Right Issue, Wrong Questions" by
Martin Clancy. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/death–penalty–debate/ . I have not decide what
book I will be using, but I will look through the Death Penalty information center for further
information and statistics. http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/ The death penalty began as far as the
seventeenth–eighteenth century B.C. It was followed by the Romans. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In Britain, they began using hanging as a new way to execute criminals. The punishment was
enforced on only heinous crimes such as adultery and treason. In the twentieth century, Portugal was
the first country to abandon the punishment. Today people argue that the death penalty is a cruel
way of punishing criminals, yet it does not reduce their numbers. Others argue that it disregards the
human rights. While many others see that murderers deserve to be executed to keep the community
safe from them. Safer prisons are been built to protect the society from people who deserve to be
isolated, yet many see that it is not just to keep a killer alive. Though many countries abolished the
death penalty, Egypt is one of the countries that still practice it. The Egyptian government allows the
judges to execute in cases like murder, terrorism, causing harm to building causing the death of the
people present at the incident, kidnapping or raping a female, drug dealing, and treason. Other
reasons for the

Hugo Bedau's Argue About The Death Penalty
Should we execute murders? That is the debate that we have been struggling with when talk about
the death penalty. A famous philosophy professor by the name of Hugo Adam Bedau has a distinct
argument on this topic that he explains in his paper, How to Argue About the Death Penalty. He
opposed the death penalty on solely moral principles and excludes the augments he believes are
strictly factual. I will show that Bedau's case against the death penalty fails because his "facts" he
excludes are morally sound arguments.
Hugo Bedau argues that a society is not required "to invoke the death penalty for murder – unless
one accepts lex talionis" that is his first premise and follows it by stating since it is not completely
accepted, lex talionis ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I believe that the criminal loses all rights and their inputs are irrelevant. Murders, for example, take
the rights away from their victims. The victims do not get a say in the final outcome. They believe
that is okay to take the rights away from someone, so they must be okay with the idea of their right
being compromised as well because they believe in it. You cannot act on something that you cannot
be okay with it happening to yourself in a similar situation. So if murders are willing to compromise
the rights of another human being, then they give up their own

Ethical Issues Surrounding Capital Punishment
The topic I chose to present on was the ethical arguments surrounding the death penalty. The death
penalty as defined by Merriam Webster is "Punishment by death; the act of killing people as
punishment for serious crimes". The method for execution is determined by the courts, the people
harmed and by the state. Each state has their own laws regarding death penalty and methods of
carrying it out, vary. The death penalty is reserved for serious crimes of which include rape, murder,
and treason. Capital punishment, in its many forms is not at all unique to the United States, as many
other countries carry it out also. There are many ethical concerns surrounding death penalty as well
as arguments from both sides to whether or not death penalty ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In Exodus 21, a set of laws is laid out before the Hebrew people declaring what is punishable by
death. For example, anyone who attacked their father and mother was to be put to death. They were
set by God to instate a sense of civility amongst people and create a society that was free of heinous
crimes. "Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,... (Exodus 21:24). This particular
verse in the bible justifies retribution for crimes committed to you as long as they were committed
purposefully. In other cases it was up to God to pass due judgement. Throughout the bible there are
many examples of God's wrath and fear of being struck down for committing crimes that plagued
societies and the general

Innocent People Have Been Removed From Death Row Essay
1. The ad's headline read: " Thanks to modern science 17 innocent people have been removed from
the death row. Thanks to modern politics 23 innocent people have been removed from the living".
Which emphasize how because of modern science, seventeen innocent people were able to be
removed from the death row. But, because of modern politics, twenty–three innocent lives were
taken away from their right to live. Hence, it's interesting because based on the numbers that are
given, the number of innocent people who have been sentenced and killed, is only a bit higher than
those who were removed. Furthermore, the ad supports the fact innocent people have been removed
from the death row by presenting the examples of Ronald Williamson and Anthony Porter. However,
it does not provide any evidence for a case where the person was sentenced and after their death
discovered he was innocent. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The first impression I got when I looked at the picture was the image of a man who has no control
over anything and as every second passes, his heart only beats, faster and faster with fear. The fear
of not knowing what will happened next or how many more seconds he has until his heart stops
beating through his chest. Such an unexplainable feeling that torments and plays with his mind as he
is unable to see or do anything about his situation. Hence, the picture and the text go hand–in–hand
with each other because just like an innocent person who is unable to escape their cell or prove
themselves innocent; the person tied to this chair has no power over anything and can't escape his
situation. 3. The ad revolves primarily around emotions and logic (to an extent). The reason I said
logic is because it's clear that incompetent lawyers exist and that in a situation like this, a person's
ethnicity can be an advantage or disadvantage. However, the ad does not provide enough facts or
evidence to reinforce their main point. Hence, it is mostly based on opinion and

Death Penalty: A Qualitative Study
The great debate on whether the death penalty is truly necessary in the United States is a great
debate still today. This debate would have to supported by whether or not it deters crimes in the
United States. The reason for this would be that if the death penalty truly did deter crime than it
would greatly be necessary in the United States compared to if it did not deter crime or had little to
no effect on the crime would result in the case that it would not be necessary. There were studies
given by scientists such as White and other studies given by Robert Dann to determine whether or
not capital punishment deterred crime. Just like White and Dann my method of purpose would be to
study whether or not capital punishment deterred crime. The study I would use would be a
qualitative study. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Using the qualitative study I would begin my study with the criminals that were on death row. Death
row is a separated part of a federal prison where those who are facing the possible death penalty
awaits. Although I would not study all of the criminals enrolled, I would study about 70 percent of
them from each federal prison being studied. I would then ask them a serious of in–depth questions
such as whether or not they knew if their state had death as a form of punishment and if so did it
affect them on the decision to commit the crime? If they were not informed that their state had death
as a form of punishment, would it have affected his decision to commit the crime? I would also ask
those on death row if they did or did not believe in capital punishment. I would even ask those on
death row if they believed their race or financial category (whether they were able to pay for what
they believed was a good attorney) played a part in them being on death row and possibly facing

The Death Penalty In The United States
The death penalty is an issue that has the United States divided. The death penalty is a controversial
problem in law that has become a popular debate among politicians due to its economical and
ethical issues. While there are many who encourage it, there is also a huge amount of those who are
against it, including myself. I believe the death penalty should be illegal throughout the country.
There are many reasons why I presume this. The debates against the death penalty are mainly moral
in their character that it is wrong to kill and when the state kills it sends out the wrong message to
the rest of the country. The death penalty should not be legal in the United States because putting the
criminal in prison would keep people safe and cost ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Acording to nccadp.org it states "according to the N.C. Department of Justice, the state murder rate
has declined in the years since executions stopped. Given this fact, there is no credible argument that
the death penalty deters crime". Nccadp.org also states that "In fact, most people on death row
committed their crimes in the heat of passion, while under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or
while suffering from mental illness". In ones opinion this quotation means there is a bigger more
wider picture and that is eliminating drugs from the picture instead of using drugs against someone.
One isnt in the right fraim of mind if they are under the influence by any drug they are not
"themselves" The use of alcohol and drugs can negatively affect all aspects of a person's life, impact
their family, friends and community, and place an enormous burden on American society. according
to ncadd.org "Nearly 50% of jail and prison inmates are clinically addicted". and "Approximately
60% of individuals arrested for most types of crimes test positive for illegal drugs at

A Research Project On Juvenile Capital Punishment
The survey that was conducted for this research project was geared toward my classmates and how
they feel towards juveniles receiving the death penalty. The survey geared towards yes or no
questions but giving explanations on why they choose yes or no. The survey had ten questions with
three of those questions having to justify their answer (see appendix A). All questions concentrated
on juvenile capital punishment and whether juveniles were in their right mind when committing
their heinous crimes. The survey had seventeen anonymous participants and a little more than half
agreed with juveniles receiving capital punishment. Some of the participants were a little harsh
towards the death penalty with juveniles as little as fifteen being able to receive capital punishment.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, which is why this survey was conducted, to gather Intel on
what others believe on capital punishment for juveniles. One participant said, "Nowadays, juveniles
are old enough to know the difference between right and wrong. We have so many different crimes
happening in the US right now that they know better. Their punishment should fit their crime. If
they murder, it should be life. If they rape, it should be at least 15 years." Others disagreed but
Interviews After gathering research from the Internet, five interviews were conducted in person to
gain more opinions toward juveniles receiving capital punishment over adults receiving capital
punishment. Only three

What Is Andrew Allentuck Pulling The Plug On Capital...
In the essay Pulling the plug on capital punishment, Andrew Allentuck uses an antithesis and an
appeal to authority to prove his thesis. He believes that Canada should not restore capital
punishment because it does not deter murderers, satisfy victims' families, and protect policemen.
The essayist uses an antithesis that he can refute for his thesis. He says, "Policemen claim their work
is intrinsically dangerous and their safety requires the death of people who murder police officers."
Allentuck refutes this antithesis by giving a statistic that Canada had the largest number of police
murders, 11 in 1962, when capital punishment was still in effect. This statistic helps refute the
antithesis because if capital punishment protected policemen,

When Taking Theology And Ethics
Before taking Theology and Ethics, I was a firm believer of the Lord, but I had never once thought
in different ways to interpret him or his word. I had taken religion classes in my church while in
high school, and we were never told or asked to think of how we interpret God 's word as I have in
my theology class.
That is a mistake made by many churches and the church classes for students that they offer. What
they tend to do is stuff information down the people 's throats instead of explaining different ways of
understanding God in their own unique way. I know that's what happened to me while I was in
church classes. I was only told information and forced to participate even though I didn't fully
understand God. It was not until I went to a church retreat where I felt God, and it was a feeling I
had never experienced before, it was a new discovery for me. The point is that I didn't feel God in
class, because that was not the teachers job. The teacher 's job is to educate us on the Lord so we can
be ready to pass a test at the end of the class, the goal should be for the students to understand and
find God. I 'm still surprised how I had never thought nor learned of breaking down the holy trinity.
I was taught what the Holy Trinity was, but I never went beyond knowing it was the father, the son,
and the holy spirit. I had never opened my eyes to the things this theology class has questioned of
me and make me pounder on.
One of the most interesting things that made me

California Death Penalty Case Study
In Western Europe and North America it seemed that the death penalty was becoming obsolete
during the latter half of the twentieth century. In 1976, Canada abolished the death penalty. In the
United States executions declined to an all–time low in 1977 when no executions took place in the
United States. In Furman v. Georgia, the US Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty constituted
"cruel and unusual punishment and thus was unconstitutional" (Galliher, Koch, & Wark 1). France's
President Mitterrand abolished the death penalty in 1981 and was the final European nation to do so.
European repugnance to the death penalty was pervasive that Germany and Great Britain barred
shipping sodium thiopental to the United States. By the 1980s, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Bruck is considered a legal expert on the topic and he took offense at much of what Mayor Ed Koch
had to say about the effectiveness of the death penalty. Mayor Koch's strange claim that the death
penalty was actually a life affirming event because it shows respect for the victim is boiler plate
moral rhetoric. This is the argument that is offered when the argument that the death penalty deters
crime is proven false (Bruck 489). This is an old fashioned argument based on notions of vengeance
that came to be considered as abstract during the twentieth century and then re–emerged along with
the religious

Capital Punishment Ethos Analysis
Rhetorical appeals are very helpful in persuading someone, and that is exactly what Coretta Scott
King used to persuade the people that the death penalty is wrong. Anyone can clearly see the use of
ethos, pathos, and logos in "The Death Penalty is a Step Back."
In order to persuade, one needs to be credible. Ethos is crucial, because no one is going to listen to
someone who is not trustworthy or reliable. King makes use of counterarguments, saying how
"proponents of capital punishment often cite a 'deterrent effect' as the main benefit of the death
penalty" (King par. 5). She goes on to point out the flaws with the argument, including the dearth of
evidence and logic of it all. Acknowledging the other sides of the argument makes her reliable,
because she is being fair. It also allows her to say why her side is better. Ethos is also apparent in the
first sentence. She points out that "although [she has] suffered the loss of two family members by
assassination," she will not be moved to think that the death penalty is ok (King par. 1). Even though
she has lost a loved one, she would not want their murderer ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In King's case, the use of strong vocabulary and smart phrasing of words make it that much easier to
agree with her. The emotions evoked are blatantly obvious in her work. She also includes the
sentence "Morality is never upheld by legalized murder" (King par. 1). No one would like to agree
with the thought of legalized murder. She uses that phrasing to make it have a more negative
connotation. Loaded word choice is seen scattered throughout the entire work. We also see that in
the last paragraph she uses figurative language, stating that "The only way to break the chain of
violent reaction is to practice nonviolence" (King par. 6). Figurative language such as this one
allows the reader to visualize the death penalty ending. It not only evokes emotion, but it is a call to
action to end her

The Most Controversial Issue Of The Death Penalty In The...
The Death Penalty A controversial issue in the United States as of recently is should the death
penalty be allowed or not. The death penalty or capital punishment, is the punishment for a severe
crime by way of death. As of July 1, 2015, the death penalty is used in thirty one states in the United
States. The main states with it are in the south and Midwest and the states without it are up north.
This is very controversial in the United States at the moment. The death penalty should be banned
from the United States because it is wrong morally and it gives criminals an easy way out for crimes
they should have to do their time for. First off, the death penalty is a punishment that is extremely
cruel. What makes it so cruel is that it isn't

Furman V. Georgia
The death penalty continues to a topic that is largely debated in the United States, but it was never
more unpopular than in the 1970s when it actually came to a halt. A moratorium is a temporary
prohibition brought about when "the Supreme Court issued its opinion on Furman v. Georgia which
struck down the death penalty nationally." The moratorium lasted from 1972–1976 and was brought
back during the time when Richard Nixon initiated the war on crime and condemned the decision on
the Furman, "These efforts to reinstate the death penalty succeeded when, only four years after
Furman, opened the door again on executions in the U.S. with its ruling on Gregg v. Georgia." After
the Gregg decision, the Supreme Court gave each state the choice to implement ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The argument that comes up almost as much as the formerly mentioned, is the notion that we as a
society, and a country with a superior justice system would be reducing ourselves to the level of the
person we want to punish for their heinous crime. Steven Pinker emphasizes the difference between
society and the people that we punish with the death penalty, "The first hallmark of moralization is
that the rules it invokes are felt to be universal. Prohibitions of rape and murder, for example, are
felt not to be matters of local custom but to be universally and objectively warranted. One can easily
say, "I don't like brussels sprouts, but I don't care if you eat them," but no one would say, "I don't
like killing, but I don't care if you murder someone." The other hallmark is that people feel that
those who commit immoral acts deserve to be punished. Not only is it allowable to inflict pain on a
person who has broken a moral rule; it is wrong not to, to "let them get away with it." People are
thus untroubled in inviting divine retribution or the power of the state to harm other people they
deem immoral" Pinker allows us the room to ponder what truly sets us apart from the accused. It
does not weigh heavy on our conscience because we have justified it enough times that most of
society is desensitized to the taking of

Against The Death Penalty Jeffrey Reiman Summary
To begin, believe it or not, death penalties have been dated all the way back from as far as the
Eighteenth Century B.C. Death penalty is the punishment of execution, administered to someone
legally convicted of a capital crime. In 1622, the first legal execution of a criminal, Daniel Frank,
occurred in Virginia for the crime of theft and was hung for his penalty. There are many forms of
death penalties such as lethal injection, electrocution, hanging, and many more! Even though the
death penalty is still around, it is getting less popular than it was before. As support for the death
penalty has fallen dramatically since hitting 80 percent in 1994, to 60 percent in 2013. In the article
"Against the Death Penalty," Jeffrey Reiman talks about how he believes it is wrong. He believes
that it isn't wrong to punish murderers less harshly instead of giving them the death penalty. Another
thing he says about the death penalty is it is an unjust practice in America due to it being applied in
arbitrary and discriminatory ways, which can lead to an unforeseeable future. Lastly, he says the
death penalty would be justified to deter future murderers, but there is no good reasoning to deter
future murderers. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, Reiman says "killers of whites are more likely to be sentenced to death than white
killers of blacks" (508). It can cause discrimination because blacks are more likely to get the death
penalty than whites. I find that true because a lot of stuff on social media or the news you can see
people talking about white privilege. This has been a huge topic lately because it feels like people of
color are still getting the different treatment. Another form of discrimination would be the legal
advantages of rich people compared to the poor in prison. Reiman says "more

The Purpose Of The Death Penalty
Death Penalty The purpose of this paper is to examine the ideas and views towards the death
penalty. The death penalty has had a various view on whether it should be eliminated from the
system due to the idea of it being cruel and unusual. While other view it as an effective way of
keeping the serious criminals completely off the streets. The death penalty laws came existent
around the eighteenth century. Most of America's influence and methods for carrying out a death
penalty came from Britain which is what they brought with them when they moved to the new land.
When the nineteenth century came around some states had begun to abolish the death penalty. As
time passed on more and more state began abolishing it, some states changed the rules ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The death row population had stayed steady on it numbers till about the 1970's is when they began
to increase. Before that, the Supreme Court ordered a hold upon all execution until after the issues
were worked out and rules had been applied. After the hold, the population of people facing death
penalty had an enormous increase. Since 2010 the number has begun to decrease leaving the public
concerned whether the executions have been carried out fairly or not. (Clear, Reisig, & Cole, 2014)
The death penalty has been limited down on who can deal with the cases and who can sentence it.
Capital Punishment cases are sent to the Supreme Court to be looked upon and for the decision to be
made on whether the criminal should be punished to death. The decisions that are made are
completely up to juries and what they believe the criminal deserves to be sentenced. The judge only
plays a small part in the case and announcing what the court has ordered. The death has been seen
ass misused and overused by the court just making a quick decision and not looking it over

Flawed Death Penalty
This Article is Flawed Form of an Opposing Viewpoint "Life in prison without the possibility of
parole keeps the public safe from killers, while eliminating the risk of an irreversible mistake"
insisted Brad Bushman in his article "The Death Penalty Is a Flawed Form of Punishment". This
wouldn't be as easy to accept if it was your loved one who was killed and you had the murderer's
fate in your hands. I believe if Bushman had given us a personal experience regarding the death
penalty, we could understand his view more clearly. There are three flawed points I would like to
bring up about this article, the perspective it was written in, the type of behavior the death penalty
models, and the unidentified research that a statement was based on. Bushman seems to have no
personal connection to the death penalty. It would be safe to assume that this is a perspective of a
bystander, with a view on this topic, gathering his information, and expressing his thoughts. But
how would he feel if he knew or even was the victim? How different would his article have been ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I think this quote would only appeal to those who knew the attacker and disagree with the
punishment. But I disagree with this statement because I don't see how violence breeds violence. If
the crime is severe enough, then the death penalty is the right thing to do. There is no need to fight if
you're in the wrong, you accept it, learn from it and move on. Does this statement assume that a
death penalty equals more death penalties? In that case, I don't see how you can use a harsh enough
punishment that would cause more cases of death penalties. In the case of the death penalty,
violence doesn't breed violence, it's enforced because it is the right punishment for the

Legal Issues Surrounding The Death Penalty

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Monica Rivera

More from Monica Rivera (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Legal Issues Surrounding The Death Penalty