1. CRICOS No. 00213J
a university for the worldreal
R 1
A/Prof. Marcello La Rosa
BPM Discipline
Queensland University ofTechnology
IAB203 – Business Process Modelling
Week 10, 5 May 2015
2. Value chains
Chains of processes. Stay at a high level. Rule of thumb: 3-7 processes
• Procure-to-service, Risk management
(Root/Main) Processes
Build up value chains and affect each other. They are abstract
• Lead-to-quote, Quote-to-order, Order-to-cash
Subprocesses
Build up processes. They are detailed, involve multiple activities and can be layered on
different levels of abstraction (i.e. sub-subprocesses)
• Order shipment, invoicing
Process tasks
Build up processes and sub-processes. They are atomic and performed by human beings, IT
systems or equipment
• Approve invoice
Typical artifacts for vertical scoping
Typical focus of Process enumeration
3. Process architecture: hierarchical view
Processhierarchy
Level 1
Process
Landscape
Level 2
Main
Processes
(e.g. BPMN)
Level 3+
Subprocesses, Tasks
(e.g. BPMN)
4. 4. Decomposition based on logical constraints, e.g.
• Predominant business object (e.g. order vs invoice)
• Predominant resource class (e.g. sales vs financial department)
5. Consider process modeling guidelines for readability
purposes (e.g. no more than 30 flow objects)
Guidelines to identify vertical boundaries
15. Process architecture vs Enterprise architecture
Process architecture is a slice of an overarching enterprise
architecture (e.g. TOGAF)
16. • If Process Architecture already in place: where does the
process fit into the Process Architecture?
• On what level is the unit of analysis, i.e. end-to-end process,
procedure or operation?
• What are the previous/subsequent processes and what are the
interfaces to them?
• What variants does this process have?
• What underlying processes describe elements of this process
in more detail?
Locating a process in an existing architecture
17. A reference model is used as a template to design the process
architecture
Examples:
• Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL)
• Supply Chain Operations Reference Model (SCOR)
• Process Classification Framework (PCF)
• Value Reference Model (VRM)
• Voluntary Interindustry Commerce Solutions (VICS)
• eTOM Business Process Framework
• Performance Framework
Designation via reference models
18. • Industry-neutral enterprise model
• Open standard for benchmarking
• Four levels
• Categories
• Process group
• Process
• Activity
Example: APQC Process Classification Framework (PCF)
21. APQC Classification Framework
Available industry sectors:
• Aerospace & Defense
• Automotive
• Banking
• Broadcasting
• Consumer Electronics Just released
• Consumer Products
• Education
• Electric Utilities
• Petroleum Downstream
• Petroleum Upstream
• Pharmaceutical
• Retail
• Telecommunications
22. Prioritization (aka Process Selection)
1. Importance
Which processes have greatest impact on the organization‘s strategic
objectives?
2. Health (or Dysfunction)
Which processes are in deepest trouble?
3. Feasibility
Which processes are most susceptible to successful process
management?
Prioritized process portfolio
Hammer, Champy (1993)
23. Financial institution
Example: prioritized process portfolio
Health
High
Low
GoodPoor
Short-term action
Rating
Contract
preparation
Loan market
evaluation
Handling of
payments
Loan
application
Loan
planning
Loan
controlling
Loan
decision
Feasibility
Low
High
Medium
Possible Strategic fit?
25. Does an assessment of the importance, health and
feasibility always point to the same processes to manage?
26. Should all processes that are important, healthy and
feasible to manage be subjected to BPM?
27. • Processes are identified with every request from
a line of business
• Ensures high relevance for involved business unit
• Reactive approach (-)
• Often restricted to discrete improvement (-)
• No conscious process selection approach (-)
Alternative: project-by-project identification
28. Pitfalls of Process Identification (1/2)
• The purpose of the project is not clear enough leading to
inappropriate scoping of the process.
• The scope of the process is too narrow leading to the fact that
later the identified root-causes are located outside the
boundaries of the process under analysis
• The scope of the process is too wide leading to a process
improvement project that has to be compromised in its lack of
detail
29. Pitfalls of Process Identification (2/2)
• The process is identified in isolation to other projects due
to poor portfolio management leading to redundancies and
inconsistencies between these projects
• Involved project members and stakeholders have not been
sufficiently informed about the benefits of the project
leading to limited participation
• The involved project members and stakeholders have not
been carefully selected leading to a very limited source of
knowledge
• The business process architect has poor facilitation skills
and cannot resolve emerging conflicts between the project
members and stakeholders.
30. References
Required
• M. Dumas, M. La Rosa, J. Mendling, H.A. Reijers, “Fundamentals of Business Process
Management”, Springer, 2013, Chapter 2
Recommended
• T.H. Davenport, “Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology”,
Harvard Business School Press, 1993
• M. Hammer, J. Champy, “Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business
Revolution”, HarperCollins, 1993
• M.E. Porter, “Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance”, Free
Press, 1985
• P. Harmon, Business Process Change, Morgan Kaufmann, 2014 (3rd edition)
• M. Rosemann, “Process Portfolio Management”, BPTrends, April 2006
• R. Dijkman, I. Vanderfeesten, H.A. Reijers, “The road to a business process architecture: an
overview of approaches and their use”. BETA Working Paper Series, WP 350. Eindhoven
University of Technology, Eindhoven (2011)
Web-sites
• http://www.value-chain.org (Value Reference Model)
• http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newSTR_66.htm (more on value chains)
• http://www.apqc.org/process-classification-framework (APQC PCF website)