Perceptions On The Effectiveness Of Pictorial Warnings
1. Abu Bakar A M; Norhazwany MS, Amalina A Cyberjaya University College of Medical Sciences PERCEPTIONS ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PICTORIAL WARNINGS – A cross-sectional study in Taman Dengkil Jaya, Selangor
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15. RESULTS Most effective pictorial warning ranked as perceived by smokers
16.
17.
18. Reference 1 Miller CL, Hill DJ, Quester PG, Hiller JE, Impact on the Australian Quitline of new graphic cigarette pack warnings including the Quitline number Tob Control. 2009 Jun;18(3):235-7. 2. Miller CL, Hill DJ, Quester PG, Hiller JE, Response of mass media, tobacco industry and smokers to the introduction of graphic cigarette pack warnings in Australia. Eur J Public Health. 2009 3. Hammond D, Fong GI, Borland R, Cummnings KM, McNeill A, Driezen P. Text and graphic warnings on cigarette packages: findings from the international tobacco control four country study. Am J Prev Med. 2007 Mar;32(3):202-9. 4. Chapman S, Carter SM, "Avoid health warnings on all tobacco products for just as long as we can": a history of Australian tobacco industry efforts to avoid, delay and dilute health warnings on cigarettes. Tob Control. 2003 Dec;12 Suppl 3:iii13-22. 5. Hammond D, Fong GI, Borland R, Cummnings KM, McNeill A, Tob Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey Control. 2006 Jun;15 Suppl 3:iii19-25.
![INTRODUCTION ,[object Object],[object Object]]()