A Guide to the Pronunciation of Indigenous Communities and Organizations
in BC
The Pronunciation Guide offered below is from the September 2018 Guide to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in
British Columbia. Please note there may be some variation from this version due to periodic updates that have
occurred since then. For changes, please email: [email protected]
1
This Guide contains aids to the pronunciation of communities and organizations listed in the Excel Database
“Guide to Indigenous Organizations and Services in British Columbia” (Previously known as The Guide to
Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia). The original Pronunciation Guide was created
with input from First Nations and other Aboriginal organizations, as well as from the First Peoples’ Cultural
Council.
British Columbia has a vast wealth of First Nations languages and cultures. There are 7 distinct language
families, completely unrelated to each other. Within these families there
are 34 different First Nations languages and at least 93 different dialects (varieties) of those
languages. Besides these 34 living languages, at least three languages which were spoken in
British Columbia are now sleeping.1 All of these languages contain a rich inventory of sounds, many of
which are not found in English.
When preparing this Guide, we asked representatives to help us understand how to pronounce the
traditional name of their community or organization. The pronunciation equivalents we have developed
here are meant as an introductory guide. The final authority on a pronunciation rests with the community.
We encourage you to gain a first-hand understanding of how a name is pronounced by speaking directly
with, and being guided by, representatives from each community.
Please note that many sounds in First Nations’ languages do not occur in English and so cannot be
expressed using the English writing system. Additionally, there are often multiple variations of a
pronunciation based on dialectal and other differences. The pronunciations represented below come as
close as possible to the correct pronunciation, while being restrained to the English alphabet. A few of the
letter combinations below are used to represent specific sounds not found in English. These are:
“wh” represents a breathy ‘wh’ sound that is pronounced with friction in the throat.
“thl” represents a breathy ‘l’ sound with friction in the mouth, similar to the l in ‘athlete’
“ts” at the beginning of a word sounds like the ‘ts’ in ‘cats’
First Nation communities and organizations continue to adopt Indigenous names distinct from anglicized
versions or non-indigenous names. You will also find we have included several names that are cross-
referenced with traditional or alternative names in brackets that may not appear in the Excel database, but
may continue to be used in communities.
For more information about First Nations’ languages in Bri.
UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
A Guide to the Pronunciation of Indigenous Communities and Org.docx
1. A Guide to the Pronunciation of Indigenous Communities and
Organizations
in BC
The Pronunciation Guide offered below is from the September
2018 Guide to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in
British Columbia. Please note there may be some variation from
this version due to periodic updates that have
occurred since then. For changes, please email:
[email protected]
1
This Guide contains aids to the pronunciation of communities
and organizations listed in the Excel Database
“Guide to Indigenous Organizations and Services in British
Columbia” (Previously known as The Guide to
Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia).
The original Pronunciation Guide was created
with input from First Nations and other Aboriginal
organizations, as well as from the First Peoples’ Cultural
Council.
British Columbia has a vast wealth of First Nations languages
and cultures. There are 7 distinct language
families, completely unrelated to each other. Within these
families there
are 34 different First Nations languages and at least 93 different
dialects (varieties) of those
languages. Besides these 34 living languages, at least three
languages which were spoken in
2. British Columbia are now sleeping.1 All of these languages
contain a rich inventory of sounds, many of
which are not found in English.
When preparing this Guide, we asked representatives to help us
understand how to pronounce the
traditional name of their community or organization. The
pronunciation equivalents we have developed
here are meant as an introductory guide. The final authority on
a pronunciation rests with the community.
We encourage you to gain a first-hand understanding of how a
name is pronounced by speaking directly
with, and being guided by, representatives from each
community.
Please note that many sounds in First Nations’ languages do not
occur in English and so cannot be
expressed using the English writing system. Additionally, there
are often multiple variations of a
pronunciation based on dialectal and other differences. The
pronunciations represented below come as
close as possible to the correct pronunciation, while being
restrained to the English alphabet. A few of the
letter combinations below are used to represent specific sounds
not found in English. These are:
“wh” represents a breathy ‘wh’ sound that is pronounced with
friction in the throat.
“thl” represents a breathy ‘l’ sound with friction in the mouth,
similar to the l in ‘athlete’
“ts” at the beginning of a word sounds like the ‘ts’ in ‘cats’
First Nation communities and organizations continue to adopt
Indigenous names distinct from anglicized
3. versions or non-indigenous names. You will also find we have
included several names that are cross-
referenced with traditional or alternative names in brackets that
may not appear in the Excel database, but
may continue to be used in communities.
For more information about First Nations’ languages in British
Columbia, please visit the First Peoples’
Cultural Council’s website (www.fpcc.ca), or the First Peoples’
Language Map of B.C.
(http://www.maps.fphlcc.ca/).
1 This information is taken from FPCC’s paper “Recognizing
the Diversity of BC's First Nations Languages”
https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/indigenous-
people/aboriginal-organizations-services
http://www.fpcc.ca/
http://www.maps.fphlcc.ca/
A Guide to the Pronunciation of Indigenous Communities and
Organizations
in BC
The Pronunciation Guide offered below is from the September
2018 Guide to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in
British Columbia. Please note there may be some variation from
this version due to periodic updates that have
occurred since then. For changes, please email:
[email protected]
2
4. Your comments and suggestions for improvement are welcome.
Please email:
[email protected]
Socio-Economic Partnerships Branch
Ministry of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation
Name of Organization Alternate or Previous Name
Pronunciation
?aqam St. Mary's Band
?Esdilagh First Nation Alexandria Indian Band ess-dey-la
Ahousaht First Nation a-howz-at
Ahousaht Holistic Centre a-howz-at
Aitchelitz Band a-che-leetz
Akisqnuk First Nation Columbia Lake First Nation a-kissk-nook
Akisqnuk Health Resource Centre a-kissk-nook
Alberni Clayoquot Métis Association may-tee
Ashcroft and District Métis Association may-tee
A-Tlegay Fisheries Society at-le-gay
Ayas Men Men Child & Family Services ay-es mun mun
BC Métis Association May-tee
Bonaparte Indian Band bone-eh-part
Boothroyd Band booth-roid
Boundary Community Métis Association Boundary Community
Métis
Association
Boundary Community Métis Association may-tee
Cariboo Chilcotin Métis Association may-tee
Carrier Chilcotin Tribal Council carry-er chill-ko-tin
Carrier Sekani Family Services carry-er sek-an-ee
Carrier Sekani Tribal Council carry-er sek-an-ee
Cayoose Creek Band kai-yuse creek
Champagne and Aishihik First Nations sham-pane and eh-
5. zhee-ack
Chawathil First Nation formerly Hope Indian Band cha-wah-
thul
Cheam First Nation chee-am
Chemainus First Nation see Stz’uminus First Nation Cha-main-
us
Cheslatta Carrier Nation chess-la-ta
Chilliwack Métis Association may-tee
Ch'nook Indigenous Business Education Chi-nook
Chrysalis Society Kris-Sull-Iss
Columbia Valley Métis Association may-tee
mailto:[email protected]
A Guide to the Pronunciation of Indigenous Communities and
Organizations
in BC
The Pronunciation Guide offered below is from the September
2018 Guide to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in
British Columbia. Please note there may be some variation from
this version due to periodic updates that have
occurred since then. For changes, please email:
[email protected]
3
Conayt Friendship Society kon-ate or kun-ate
Conayt Housing kon-ate or kun-ate
Coqualeetza Cultural Education Centre co-ka-leetz-a
Council of the Haida Nation hy-dah
Cowichan Tribes cow-i-chin
Cowichan Valley Métis Nation cow-i-chin / may-tee
Cwenengitel Aboriginal Society kwa-nin-cha-tul
6. Dana Naye Ventures da-na-nay
Da'naxda'xw First Nation Tanakteuk Indian Band da-naw-dawh
Daylu Dena Council formerly Lower Post First Nation day-lou
den-a
Dene Tsaa Tse K'Nai First Nation see Prophet River First
Nation de-ne tsah tsay k-nai
Denisiqi Services Society den-ne-se-kai
Ditidaht First Nation formerly Nitinaht First Nation dee-tee-dot
Dzawada'enuxw First Nation formerly Tsawataineuk First
Nation
dza-wah-day-noowh
Dze L K'ant Friendship Centre Society zel-kant
Ehattesaht First Nation ee-hat-a-sut
Elk Valley Métis Association may-tee
En'owkin Centre Okanagan Indian Educational
Resources Society
en-ow-kin
Esk'etemc ess-ke-tem
Esquimalt Nation es-kwai-malt
Fort Nelson Métis Society may-tee
Fort St. John Métis Society may-tee
Fraser Valley Métis Association may-tee
Gitanmaax Band Council git-n-max
Gitanyow Band Council git-n-yow
Gitanyow Hereditary Chiefs' Office git-n-yow
Gitga'at First Nation Hartley Bay Band Council git-gat
Gitksan Watershed Authorities gicks-san
Gitksan Wet’suwet’en Education Society gicks-san wet-so-a-
den
Gitmaxmak’ay Nisga’a Prince Rupert/Port
Edward Society
7. git-ma-mgai nis-gah
Gitsegukla Band Council gits-a guk-la
Gitwangak Band Council git-wan-gawk
Gitxaala Nation formerly Kitkatla First Nation git-gath-la
Gitxsan Child and Family Services Society gicks-san
A Guide to the Pronunciation of Indigenous Communities and
Organizations
in BC
The Pronunciation Guide offered below is from the September
2018 Guide to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in
British Columbia. Please note there may be some variation from
this version due to periodic updates that have
occurred since then. For changes, please email:
[email protected]
4
Gitxsan Government Commission gicks-san
Gitxsan Health Society gicks-san
Gitxsan Hereditary Chiefs' Office gicks-san
Gitxsan Treaty Society gicks-san
Gitxsan Unlocking Aboriginal Justice gicks-san
Gitxsan Watershed Authorities gicks-san
Golden Ears Métis Society may-tee
Gwa'sala-'Nakwaxda'xw Nation Tsulquate Band gwa-sal-a
nawk-wa-dawh
Gwawaenuk Tribe gwah-way-ee-nook
Gya' Wa' Tlaab Healing Centre Society geeya-wah-tlawb
8. Hagwilget Village Council hag-wil-git
Haida Child and Family Services Society hy-day gwai
Haida Gwaii Community Futures hy-day gwai
Haida Gwaii Restorative Justice, c/o Haida
Tribal Society
hy-day gwai
Haisla Nation Council Haisla Nation, Kitamaat Village
Council
High-sla
Halalt First Nation hull-alt
Ha-Shilth-Sa Newspaper ha-shilth-sa
Heiltsuk Cultural Education Centre helts-uk
Heiltsuk Kaxla Society helts-uk kaks-la
Heiltsuk Nation formerly Bella Bella Indian Band helts-uk
Heiltsuk Tribal Council helts-uk
Hesquiaht First Nation hesh-qwee-at
Hiiye'yu Lelum (House of Friendship)
Society
he-yay-ya lay-lum
Homalco First Nation hoe-mall-co
Hulitan Family and Community Services
Society
hull-eet-n
Hul'qumi'num Treaty Group hull-kuh-mee-num
Hupacasath First Nation ho-putch-eh-set
9. Huu-ay-aht Development Corporation ho-ay-at
Huu-ay-aht First Nations ho-ay-at
In-SHUCK-ch Nation in-shuck-sh
Interior Métis Child and Family Services may-tee
A Guide to the Pronunciation of Indigenous Communities and
Organizations
in BC
The Pronunciation Guide offered below is from the September
2018 Guide to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in
British Columbia. Please note there may be some variation from
this version due to periodic updates that have
occurred since then. For changes, please email:
[email protected]
5
Iskut Band Council isk-cut or Alternate of is-
koot
Island Métis Family and Community
Services Society
may-tee
K’ómoks First Nation co-mox
Ka:'yu:'k't'h'/Che:k:tles7et'h' First Nation Kyuquot Native Tribe
kai-you-cut / sheh-kluh-szet
alternatively kai-you-cut
/chek-tluh-set
10. Kackaamin Family Development Centre
Association
ka-kaah-min
Kanaka Bar Indian Band can-a-ka bar
Kaska Dena Council kas-ka
Katzie First Nation kat-zee
Kekinow Native Housing Society kee-kin-oh
Kekuli Centre keh-koo-lee
Kelowna Métis Association may-tee
Kikino Métis Children & Family Services kee-kin-oh
Ki-Low-Na Friendship Society key-low-nah
Kispiox Band Council kiss-pea-ox
Kitasoo Band Council Klemtu Band ki-ta-soo
Kitkatla First Nation see Gitxaala Nation kit-cat-la
Kitselas First Nation kit-sel-us
Kitselas Treaty and Resource Office kit-sel-us
Kitsumkalum First Nation kits-um-kale-um
Kitsumkalum Health Centre kits-um-kale-um
Kitsumkalum Treaty Office kits-um-kale-um
Klahoose First Nation kla-hoose
Kluskus Indian Band see Lhoosk’uz Dené Nation looze-k’ U z
Knucwentwecw Society kanuk-when-twah
Kootenay South Métis Society may-tee
Ksan Historical Village and Museum Ka-san (also gicks-san?)
Ktunaxa Kinbasket Aboriginal Training
Council (KKATC)
te-nawh-ha Kinbasket
Ktunaxa Kinbasket Treaty Council te-nawh-ha Kinbasket
Ktunaxa Nation Council (KNC) te-nah-ha alternatively k-
11. too-nah-ha
Ktunaxa/Kinbasket Child & Family
Services
te-nah-ha / kinbasket
A Guide to the Pronunciation of Indigenous Communities and
Organizations
in BC
The Pronunciation Guide offered below is from the September
2018 Guide to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in
British Columbia. Please note there may be some variation from
this version due to periodic updates that have
occurred since then. For changes, please email:
[email protected]
6
KUU-US Crisis Line Society
koo-us
Kwadacha Nation Fort Ware Indian Band kwa-da-chuh
Kwakiutl Band Council kwa-gul
Kwakiutl District Council kwa-gul
Kwakiutl District Council Health (KDC
Health)
kwa-gul
12. Kwantlen First Nation Fort Langley Band kwant-len
Kwaw-kwaw-apilt First Nation kwa-kwa-plit
Kwiakah First Nation kway-ka
Kwikwasut'inuxw Haxwa'mis First Nation quick-wa-sut-uh-
nook / ha-
kwuh-meesh
Kwikwetlem First Nation kwee-kwet-lum
Kw'umut Lelum Child & Family Services kwa-mut lay-lum
Laich-Kwil-Tach Treaty Society lee-kwa-ta
Laichwiltach Family Life Society lee-kwa-ta
Lake Cowichan First Nation cow-i-chin
Lalum'utul' Smun'eem Child and Family
Services
lay-lum-atul smah-nawm
LÁU,WELNEW Tribal School lhay-wull-nough
Lax Kw'alaams Band lacks-qwah-lambs
Laxgalts'ap Village Government lax-galt-sap
Leq’á:mel First Nation la-cam-el
Lheidli-T'enneh Band clayt-clay den-ay
Lheidli-T'enneh Natural Resource Office clayt-clay den-ay
Lhoosk’uz Dené Nation looze-k' U z den-ay
Lhtako Dene Nation Red Bluff Band Office lah-ta-ko den-ay
Liard First Nation lee-ard
Lil'wat Nation lil-watt
Little Shuswap Indian Band shoo-shwahp
Lower Similkameen Indian Band si-mil-kuh-meen
Lyackson First Nation lye-ack-son
Maa-Nulth First Nations maw-nawlth
Maiyoo Keyoh Society My-you Kay-yo
M'akola Housing Society ma-ko-la
Mamalilikulla First Nation Mamalilikulla-Qwe'Qwa'Sot'Em
13. Band
ma-ma-leelah-kwalah kwe-
kwah-sum
Matsqui First Nation mats-sqwee
A Guide to the Pronunciation of Indigenous Communities and
Organizations
in BC
The Pronunciation Guide offered below is from the September
2018 Guide to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in
British Columbia. Please note there may be some variation from
this version due to periodic updates that have
occurred since then. For changes, please email:
[email protected]
7
Métis Commission for Children and
Families of BC
14. may-tee
Métis Community Services Society of BC may-tee
Métis Employment and Training Program may-tee
Métis Family Services may-tee
Métis Matters Radio Show may-tee
Métis Nation BC may-tee
Métis Nation Columbia River Society may-tee
Métis Nation of Greater Victoria may-tee
Métis Women of British Columbia may-tee
Metlakatla Governing Council met-la-cat-la
Metlakatla Treaty Office met-la-cat-la
Mid-Island Métis Nation Association may-tee
MIKI'SIW Métis Association may-tee
Moccasin Flat's Métis Society may-tee
Mowachaht/Muchalaht First Nation mo-which-it/much-a-lit
Musgamagw Tsawataineuk Tribal Council moos-ga-muk zow-
wa-dane-
nook
Musqueam Indian Band mus-kwee-um
Nadleh Whut'en Band nad-lee woo-ten
Nak'azdli Alternate Justice Centre na-caused-lee
Nak'azdli Band Necosli Band na-caused-lee
‘Namgis Community Services nhum-geez
‘Namgis First Nation nhum-geez
‘Namgis Health Centre nhum-geez
Nanoose Te'mexw Treaty Association
na-noose tey-muck
Nat'oot'ten Nation see Lake Babine Nation nad-oo-ten
Naut’sa mawt Resources Group, Inc. nawt-saw-mawt
Naut'sa mawt Tribal Council nawt-saw-mawt
15. Nawican Friendship Centre now-i-kin
Nazko First Nation nazz-co
Nazko Treaty Office nazz-co
Nee-Tahi-Buhn Indian Band knee-tie-boon
Nelson and Area Métis Society may-tee
Nenqayni Wellness Centre Society nen-ky-knee
Neskonlith Indian Band ness-con-lith
New Aiyansh Village Government new eye-annch
A Guide to the Pronunciation of Indigenous Communities and
Organizations
in BC
The Pronunciation Guide offered below is from the September
2018 Guide to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in
British Columbia. Please note there may be some variation from
this version due to periodic updates that have
occurred since then. For changes, please email:
[email protected]
8
Nezul Be Hunuyeh Child & Family Services
Society
nezul bay hun-yeah
Nicola Valley & District Métis Society may-tee
Nicomen Indian Band ni-kuh-men
NIL/TU,O Child & Family Services Society neeth-two-wa
Nisga’a Lisims Government nis-gah liss-ums
Nis'ga’a Ts’amiks Vancouver Society nis-gah tsa-miks
Nisga’a Valley Health Authority nis-gah
16. Nisga’a Village of Gingolx nis-gah / gin-gol-lix
Nisga'a Child & Family Services nis-gah
Nisga'a Village of Gitwinksihlkw nis-gah / git-win-silk
Nitinaht First Nation see Ditidaht First Nation dee-tee-dot
Nlaka'pamux Nation Tribal Council ent-la-cap-um
Nlha'7kapmx Child & Family Services ent-la-cap-um
Nooaitch Indian Band new-ich
North Cariboo Métis Association may-tee
North East Métis Association may-tee
North Fraser Métis Association may-tee
North Island Métis Nation may-tee
North West BC Métis Association may-tee
Northern Shuswap Tribal Council Northern Secwepemc te
Quelmucw
shoo-shwahp
Northwest BC Métis Association may-tee
N'Quatqua First Nations neh-qwa-qwa
Nuchatlaht First Nation new-chat-lat
Nupqu Development Corporation noop-ku
Nuu-chah-nulth new-chaw-nulth
Nuu-chah-nulth Child and Family Services new-chaw-nulth
Nuu-chah-nulth Economic Development
Corporation
new-cha-nulth
Nuu-chah-nulth NIHB new-chaw-nulth
Nuu-chah-nulth Tribal Council new-chaw-nulth
Nuxalk Nation Bella Coola First Nation new-hawk
Office of the Wet'suwet'en wet-so-a-den
Okanagan Métis & Aboriginal Housing
Society
may-tee
17. OoknaKane Friendship Centre ooka-na-cane
Osoyoos Indian Band oh-soy-use
A Guide to the Pronunciation of Indigenous Communities and
Organizations
in BC
The Pronunciation Guide offered below is from the September
2018 Guide to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in
British Columbia. Please note there may be some variation from
this version due to periodic updates that have
occurred since then. For changes, please email:
[email protected]
9
Oweekeno Nation See Wuikinuxv Nation whee-kin-au
Pacheedaht First Nation pah-chee-dat
Pauquachin First Nation paw-kwi-chin
Pauquachin Health Centre paw-kwi-chin
Penelakut Tribe pen-el-a-cut
Popkum First Nation c/o Sto:lo Nation pop-kwum
Powell River Métis Society may-tee
Prince George Métis Community
Association
may-tee
Prince Rupert & District Metis Community may-tee
Prophet River First Nation Dene Tsaa Tse K'Nai First Nation
de-ne tsah tsay k-nai
Qayqayt First Nation New Westminster Indian Band key-kite
18. Qualicum First Nation kwal-i-come
Quatsino First Nation quat-see-know
Quesnel Tillicum Society Native
Friendship Centre
qwi-nel till-i-kum
Quw'utsun Syuw’entst Lelum' Culture and
Education Centre
ko-whuts-sun swhents lay-
lum
Qwallayuw Head Start qkwell-eye-you
Rocky Mountain Métis Association may-tee
Saik'uz First Nation sigh-cuz
Sal'i'shan Institute sal-i-shan
Salmon Arm Métis Association may-tee
Saulteau First Nation so-tow
Scia'new First Nation Beecher Bay First Nation chee-a-new
Scia'new Treaty Office chee-a-new
Scw'exmx Child and Family Services
Society
shwa-come
Scw'exmx Community Health Services
Society
shwa-come
Sechelt Indian Band Child & Family
Services
see-shelt
19. Secwepemc Child and Family Services
Agency
sec-wep-emc
Secwepemc Cultural Education Society sec-wep-emc
Semiahmoo First Nation semi-ah-moo
Sexqeltqin Health Centre se-kell-keen
Shackan Indian Band shack-n
A Guide to the Pronunciation of Indigenous Communities and
Organizations
in BC
The Pronunciation Guide offered below is from the September
2018 Guide to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in
British Columbia. Please note there may be some variation from
this version due to periodic updates that have
occurred since then. For changes, please email:
[email protected]
10
shíshálh Nation Sechelt Indian Band see-shelt
Shuswap Family Resource and Referral
Centre
shoo-shwahp
Shuswap Indian Band shoo-shwahp
Shuswap Nation Tribal Council shoo-shwahp
Shxw’?whámél First Nation shwah-ham-ul
Shxwha:y Village Skway First Nation shwhy
20. Simpcw First Nation North Thompson Indian Band sim-ka
Siska Indian Band sis-ka
Skatin Nations skah-teen
Skawahlook First Nation skow-look
Skidegate Band Council skid-eh-get
Skin Tyee Nation skin-tye-ee
Skowkale First Nation skow-cale
Skuppah Indian Band scup-pa
Skwah First Nation skwah
Skway First Nation see Shxwha:y Village sh-why
Slelemw Child Development Centre sull-ay-mu
Sliammon Development Corporation sly-am-mon
Snaw-Naw-As First Nation see Nanoose First Nation snaw-naw-
as
Snaza'ist Discovery Centre snaw-zay-ist
Snc'c'amala?tn Okanagan Indian Band
Early Childhood Education Centre
sun-chich-she-mall-it-ton
Snuneymuxw First Nation snue-ney-mowck
Snuneymuxw First Nation Health Centre snue-ney-mowck
Songhees Nation song-geez
Songhees Treaty Office song-geez
Soowahlie Indian Band sue-wall-e
South Okanagan Similkameen Métis
Association
si-mil-kuh-meen
Southern Stl'atl'imx Health Society stat-lee-um
Splatsin Spallumcheen Indian Band spla-cheen
Spuzzum First Nation spuz-zum
Sqewlets First Nation Scowlitz First Nation scow-litz
Squamish Nation squa-mish
Squamish Ocean Canoe Family squa-mish
21. Squiala First Nation skwai-all-a
Stellat'en First Nation stull-a-tin
A Guide to the Pronunciation of Indigenous Communities and
Organizations
in BC
The Pronunciation Guide offered below is from the September
2018 Guide to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in
British Columbia. Please note there may be some variation from
this version due to periodic updates that have
occurred since then. For changes, please email:
[email protected]
11
Stitsma Employment Centre schtitz-ma
Sto:lo Aboriginal Skills and Employment
Training
staw-low
Sto:lo Nation Community Development
Department and Qwi:Qwelstom
staw-low
Sto:lo Nation Health Services staw-low
Sto:lo Nation Society staw-low
Sto:lo Tribal Council staw-low
Stó:lo Xwexwilmexw Treaty Association Staw-low
Sts'ailes formerly Chehalis Indian Band sta-ay-liss
Stswecem'c -Xgat'tem First Nation Canoe Creek Band St-wet-
22. lem hight-lem
Stu''ate LeLum Secondary School stu-eight lay-lum
Stz’uminus First Nation Chemainus First Nation sha-main-us
Sulsila Lelum Wellness Centre Society sawl-see-la-lee-lum
Sumas First Nation sue-mas
Tahltan Band tall-tan
Tahltan Health and Social Services
Authority
tall-tan
Takla Lake First Nation tack-lah
Taku River Tlingit First Nation ta-koo-river tling-get
Tale'awtxw Aboriginal Capital Corporation tah-la-hout
Tansi Friendship Centre Society tawn-say
Te'mexw Treaty Association tey-muck
T'exelc Treaty Williams Lake Indian Band teh-huwl
Tillicum Lelum Aboriginal Friendship
Centre
till-i-kum lay-lum
T'it'q'et Administration tilth-kit
Tla’amin Health Tla'amin Community Health
Services
sly-am-mon
Tla'amin Nation sly-am-mon
Tla-o-qui-aht First Nation klay-o-kwee-at
Tlatlasikwala First Nation Nuwitti Band tla-tla-see-kwa-la
Tl'azt'en Nation tlaz-den
Tl'etinqox-T'in Government Office kleh-deen-ko-teen
Tlowitsis Nation tlow-eet-sees
Toosey Indian Band two-zee
Toquaht Nation tow-kwat
23. Tri-River Métis Association may-tee
A Guide to the Pronunciation of Indigenous Communities and
Organizations
in BC
The Pronunciation Guide offered below is from the September
2018 Guide to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in
British Columbia. Please note there may be some variation from
this version due to periodic updates that have
occurred since then. For changes, please email:
[email protected]
12
Tsartlip First Nation sart-lip
Tsartlip Health Centre sart-lip
Tsawout First Nation say-out
Tsawout Health say-out
Tsawwassen First Nation tsa-wah-sen
Tsay Keh Dene Band say-kay-denay
TseK'hene First Nation see McLeod Lake Indian Band tse-kan-
ay
Ts’elxwéyeqw Tribe Management chil-kway-uhk
Tseshaht First Nation say-shot
Tseshaht Health Clinic say-shot
Tseshaht Youth Centre say-shot
Ts'ewulhtun Health Centre of the
Cowichan Tribes
say-wool-tun / cow-i-chin
Tseycum First Nation say-come
24. Tŝideldel First Nation Alexis Creek Indian Band tsigh-dell-dell
Tsilhqot'in National Government sill-ko-teen
Tsimshian First Nations Treaty Society sim-she-an
Ts'kw'aylaxw First Nation Pavilion Indian Band tisk-why-lah
Tsleil-Waututh Nation Burrard Band sail-wha-tooth
T'Sou-ke Nation tsa-awk
Tsow-Tun Le Lum Society Residential
Substance Abuse Treatment Centre
sow-tun-lay-lum
Tsq'escen' Canim Lake Band chess-ken
Two Rivers Métis Society may-tee
Tzeachten First Nation chee-ack-ten
Uchucklesaht Tribe u-chuk-les-at
Ulkatcho First Nations ul-kat-cho
U'mista Cultural Centre oo-miss-ta
Usma Nuu-Chah-Nulth Family and Child
Services
us-mah new-cha-nulth
United Canadian Métis Nation Vancouver Métis Citizens
Society
may-tee
Vancouver Métis Community Association may-tee
Vernon & District Métis Association may-tee
Waceya Métis Society may-tee
Wachiay Friendship Centre Society wha-chey
Wazdidadilh Aboriginal Infant & Family
Development Program
woss-did-a-duh
25. A Guide to the Pronunciation of Indigenous Communities and
Organizations
in BC
The Pronunciation Guide offered below is from the September
2018 Guide to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in
British Columbia. Please note there may be some variation from
this version due to periodic updates that have
occurred since then. For changes, please email:
[email protected]
13
We Wai Kai First Nation wee-wa-kai
Wei Wai Kum First Nation wee-wha-come
Wet'suwet'en First Nation wet-so-a-den
Whe-La-La-U Area Council we-lala-you
Whispering Pines / Clinton Band - the
Pellt'iq't People
pel-tighk
Wilp Si'Satxw Community Healing Centre wilp-s-sat
Wilp Wilxo'oskwhl Nisga’a Institute wilp will-kosk-wuh
WSÁNE? School Board wh-say-nuch
Wuikinuxv Nation Oweekeno Nation whee-kin-au
Wuikinuxv-Kitasoo-Nuxalk Tribal Council whee-kin-au; kit-a-
soo; new-
hawk
Xat'súll First Nation Soda Creek hat-sull
Xaxli'p Band Fountain Band hawk-leap
26. Xaxli'p Health Centre hawk-leap
Xeni Gwet'in First Nations Government Nemaiah Band hon-ay
gwi-teen
Xolhemet Society o-le-met
Xyolhemeylh Child and Family Services yoth-me
Yakweakwioose Band ya-kweek-we-oos
Yekooche First Nation yeh-koo-chee
Yinka Déné Language Institute ying-kaw denay
Yunesit'in Government you-neh-seh-teen
Yuu?u?i??at? Government formerly Ucluelet First Nation u-
clew-let
Environmentalism
This page intentionally left blank
Environmentalism
David Peterson del Mar
ISBN: 978-1-4082-5558-2
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
A CIP catalogue record for this book can be obtained from the
British Library
27. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
Peterson del Mar, David, 1957–.
Environmentalism / David Peterson del Mar.
p. cm
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-1-4082-5558-2 (pbk.)
1. Environmentalism–History. 2. Nature conservation–History.
3. Natural areas–History. I. Title.
Ge195.P478 2011
333.7209–dc22
2011001745
Set in 10/13.5pt Berkeley Book by 35
The right of David Peterson del Mar to be identified as author
of this work has been
asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and
Patents Act 1988.
2006
2006, 2012
This edition published 2012
Introduction to the series
History is narrative constructed by historians from traces left by
the past.
28. Historical enquiry is often driven by contemporary issues and,
in conse-
quence, historical narratives are constantly reconsidered,
reconstructed and
reshaped. The fact that different historians have different
perspectives on
issues means that there is also often controversy and no
universally agreed
version of past events. Seminar Studies was designed to bridge
the gap between
current research and debate, and the broad, popular general
surveys that
often date rapidly.
The volumes in the series are written by historians who are not
only familiar
with the latest research and current debates concerning their
topic, but who
have themselves contributed to our understanding of the subject.
The books
are intended to provide the reader with a clear introduction to a
major topic
in history. They provide both a narrative of events and a critical
analysis of
contemporary interpretations. They include the kinds of tools
generally
omitted from specialist monographs: a chronology of events, a
glossary of
terms and brief biographies of ‘who’s who’. They also include
bibliographical
essays in order to guide students to the literature on various
aspects of the
subject. Students and teachers alike will find that the selection
of documents
will stimulate discussion and offer insight into the raw
materials used by
29. historians in their attempt to understand the past.
Clive Emsley and Gordon Martel
Series Editors
This page intentionally left blank
Contents
Acknowledgements x
Publisher’s acknowledgements xi
Chronology xii
Who’s who xiv
Glossary xvii
Map xxiii
PART ONE ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT 1
1 INTRODUCTION 3
2 DOMESTICATING THE WILD 6
Background 7
The birth of conservation 8
Nostalgia and nature loving 10
The birth of nature tourism 12
Pets 14
Environmentalism in the colonies and early US 15
3 INDUSTRIAL NATURE LOVING 18
The spread of conservation and preservation 19
Nature and nation 21
Wild nature 26
30. Domesticating the wild 28
4 THE FRIENDLY WILD OF POST-WAR AFFLUENCE 32
Background 33
American suburbs 34
The friendly wild 35
Meaning and ecology 38
5 THE COUNTER-CULTURE’S NATURE 41
Prosperity and alienation 41
Wild = good 43
Nature loving goes mainstream 45
Farley Mowat and the world we have lost 46
Mother nature’s sons: Cousteau and Denver 48
6 EPIPHANIES 50
Silent Spring 51
Green surge 52
Western Europe 53
The rest of the West 56
Green nationalism 58
7 RADICAL DEPARTURES 60
Background 60
Deep ecology 62
Bioregionalism and ecofeminism 64
Friends of the Earth 65
Greenpeace and Earth First! 67
8 THWARTED 70
Background 70
Western European Greens 72
Central and Eastern Europe 74
31. Backlash and accommodation 75
Success stories 79
Divisions 81
9 EXTREME NATURE LOVING 83
Wilderness and technology 84
Wild playgrounds 85
Consuming nature 87
Aquariums and dogs 90
Freeing Keiko and finding Nemo 93
10 ASSESSMENT 95
viii ENVIRONMENTALISM
PART TWO DOCUMENTS 99
1 Beowulf 100
2 William Wordsworth, Tintern Abbey 102
3 The Cruelty to Animals Act of 1835 106
4 George Perkins Marsh, Man and Nature 108
5 Anna Sewell, Black Beauty 109
6 William Morris, News from Nowhere 111
7 Robert Baden-Powell, Scouting for Boys 112
8 John Muir, My First Summer in the Sierras 115
9 J.R.R. Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring 116
10 Aldo Leopold, A Sand County Almanac 118
11 Rachel Carson, Silent Spring 120
12 Farley Mowat, Never Cry Wolf 121
13 Edward Abbey, Desert Solitaire: A Season in the Wilderness
123
14 Richard Adams, Watership Down 124
15 Donella H. Meadows et al., The Limits to Growth: A Report
32. for
the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind 126
16 Arne Naess, ‘The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range
Ecology
Movements’ 128
17 Endangered Species Act of 1973 133
18 Where You At? A Bioregional Quiz 133
19 Earth First! Action in Oregon, 1985 134
20 United Nations Conference on Environment and
Development,
Rio de Janeiro, 1992 137
21 Petra Kelly, ‘Creating an Ecological Economy’ 138
22 Kyoto Protocol, 1997 139
23 Bjørn Lomborg, The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring
the
Real State of the World 142
24 ‘10 Steps to Animal Communication’ 145
25 Al Gore, An Inconvenient Truth: The Planetary Emergency
of
Global Warming and What We Can Do About It 147
26 Rural Manifesto of the Countryside Alliance, 2009 149
27 Report of the League Against Cruel Sports, 2010 150
GUIDE TO FURTHER READING 152
REFERENCES 159
INDEX 169
Contents ix
33. Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Gordon Martel, both for inviting me to write
this book and
for insisting that I do so boldly. He also straightened many
kinks in my prose
and reasoning. Josie O’Donoghue at Pearson was very helpful
throughout the
revision process.
This book depends on the work of many researchers and writers.
I am
particularly indebted to Michael Bess, Jon Katz, Roderick
Frazier Nash,
Jennifer Price, Harriet Ritvo, Keith Thomas, and Meredith
Veldman.
As always, Wendy del Mar has been a wonderfully warm and
supportive
life partner. Peter, my son, allows me to see the whole world
with new eyes.
Publisher’s acknowledgements
We are grateful to the following for permission to reproduce
copyright material:
Photographs
Plate 1. The Bridgeman Art Library and Museum of Fine Arts,
Boston,
Massachusetts, USA (Henry Lillie Pierce Fund). Plate 2.
34. Maurice Branger/
Roger-Viollet. Plate 3. Three Lions/Getty Images. Plate 4.
NASA. Plate 5.
Weyler/Greenpeace. Plate 6. Gary Crabbe/Alamy Ltd. Plate 7.
Arco Images
GmbH/Alamy Ltd. Plate 8. Painting by Nantucket Artist, Louis
Guarnaccia.
Map
Map from An Inconvenient Truth, Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
(Al Gore 2006)
Text
Poetry on pages 100–2 adapted by David Breeden from
Beowulf; Extract on
pages 115–6 from My First Summer in the Sierras, Houghton
Mifflin ( John Muir
1911); Extract on pages 121–2 from Never Cry Wolf,
McCelland & Stewart
Ltd (Mowat, F 1963); Extract on pages 138–9, Reprinted from
Thinking
Green! Essays on Environmentalism, Feminism, and
Nonviolence (1994)
by Petra K. Kelly with permission of Parallax Press, Berkeley,
California,
www.parallax.org; Extract on pages 142–5 from The Skeptical
Environmentalist:
Measuring the Real State of the World, Cambridge University
Press (1998)
pp. 330–332, Copyright Bjorn Lomborg 2001, published by
Cambridge Univer-
sity Press, reproduced with permission; Extract on page 69,
Copyright 1999,
from the book Animal Talk by Penelope Smith, Reprinted with
35. permission of
Beyond Words Publishing, Inc., Hillsboro, Oregon. All rights
reserved.
In some instances we have been unable to trace the owners of
copyright material,
and we would appreciate any information that would enable us
to do so.
http://www.parallax.org
Chronology
1669 French Forest Ordinance
1761 Jean Jacques Rousseau, The New Heloise
1798 William Wordsworth, Tintern Abbey
1824 Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals founded
in England
1831 British Association for the Advancement of Science
founded
1854 Henry David Thoreau, Walden
1859 First dog show held in England
1864 George Perkins Marsh, Man and Nature
1872 Yellowstone National Park established in the US
1877 Anna Sewell, Black Beauty
36. 1879 Royal National Park established in New South Wales,
Australia
1885 Banff National Park established in Canada
1889 Society for the Protection of Birds founded in Great
Britain
1892 Sierra Club founded in the US
1895 National Trust founded in Great Britain
1902 Beatrix Potter, The Tale of Peter Rabbit
1905 Federation of Rambling Clubs founded in England
1907 Boy Scouts founded in England
1914 France’s first national park
1917 Spain’s first national park
1920 First national park in the Soviet Union
1934 Germany becomes the first nation to protect wolves
1942 Disney’s Bambi
1949 Aldo Leopold, A Sand County Almanac
1952 London smog
Chronology xiii
37. 1956 Dam on Colorado River blocked in US
1962 Rachel Carson, Silent Spring
1963 Partial Test Ban Treaty
1964 Wilderness Act in US
1967 Torrey Canyon oil spill
1968 Edward Abbey’s Desert Solitaire
Paul Ehrlich, The Population Bomb
The Undersea World of Jacques Cousteau premieres
Sweden’s Environmental Protection Law
1969 Radical student protests in western Europe
Friends of the Earth founded in the US
1970 Earth Day
1971 Greenpeace founded in Canada
1972 Club of Rome, Limits to Growth
Arne Naess coins the term ‘deep ecology’
West Germany’s Council of Environmental Experts established
United Nations Stockholm Conference on the Human
Environment
1973 British Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution
38. established
Peter Singer coins the term ‘animal liberation’
1975 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park founded
1978 Toxic wastes found at Love Canal in US
1980 Earth First! founded in US
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals founded in US
1983 West Germany’s Green Party wins representation in the
Bundestag
1986 Accident at Chernobyl nuclear power plant in the Soviet
Union
1987 World Commission on the Environment stresses
sustainable development
1989 The Green Parties of the United Kingdom and France win
15 and
10 per cent of the vote, respectively, in European elections
1991 Founding of the People of Color Environmental
Leadership in the US
1992 United Nations Rio de Janeiro Summit
1998 Keiko returns to Iceland
2004 Hunting Act passes UK Parliament
2006 Release of An Inconvenient Truth
39. Who’s who
Abbey, Edward (1927–1989): US novelist and essayist, radical
environmentalist.
Adams, Richard (1920– ): British writer whose best known book
(Watership
Down, 1972) expressed sympathy for rabbits victimized by
human development.
Bookchin, Murray, aka Lewis Herber, (1921–2006): US
socialist and a
leading social ecologist who linked social and environmental
exploitation.
Brower, David (1912–2000): US environmentalist, founder of
Friends of
the Earth.
Buffon, George Louis Leclerc de (1707–1788): French scientist
and author,
perhaps the most prominent naturalist of the eighteenth century.
Carson, Rachel (1907–1964): US biologist and writer, author of
Silent Spring,
the book that jump-started the modern environmental movement
after it
appeared in 1962.
Clements, Frederic Edward (1874–1945): US botanist and
pioneering
ecologist who emphasized climax communities and other
expressions of
ecological stability.
40. Cousteau, Jacques (1910–1997): Popular French oceanographer
who
achieved great fame on television.
Denver, John (1943–1997): Popular US country singer who
celebrated wild
places.
Foreman, Dave (1947– ): US environmentalist who left the
Sierra Club to
help found the much more radical Earth First!
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von (1749–1832): German Romantic
poet, philoso-
pher, and scientist who greatly influenced European artists and
scholars.
Goodall, Jane (1934– ): English primate researcher whose work
on the
human-like characteristics of chimpanzees has enjoyed a wide
readership
outside of academia.
Kelly, Petra (1947–1992): Charistmatic West German Green
Party leader.
Leopold, Aldo (1887–1948): US ecologist, author of A Sand
County
Almanac, promulgated the ‘land ethic,’ which anticipated Deep
Ecology.
Linnaeus, Carl (1707–1778): Swedish scientist whose elaborate
system
41. of nested classification dominated natural history well into the
nineteenth
century.
Lomborg, Bjørn (1965– ): Danish scholar whose The Skeptical
Environ-
mentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World, first
published in 1998, seeks
to debunk more alarmist assessments of environmental health
and world
poverty.
Marsh, George Perkins (1801–1882): Pioneering US
conservationist,
particularly of forests, author of Man and Nature.
McTaggart, David (1932–2001): Canadian radical
environmentalist who
headed Greenpeace for many years.
Morris, William (1834–1896): Leading English socialist,
designer, and
author who urged a return to rural places and values rather than
embracing
industrialization.
Mowat, Farley (1921– ): Widely read Canadian author of many
nature
books.
Muir, John (1838–1914): US wilderness advocate, writer,
founding presi-
dent of the Sierra Club.
Naess, Arne (1912–2009): Norwegian philosopher, founder of
Deep Ecology.
42. Pinchot, Gifford (1865–1946): Influential forester and the
founding head of
the US Forest Service.
Potter, Beatrix (1866–1943): British author of children’s books
featuring
animals that dressed and acted like humans, starting with The
Tale of Peter
Rabbit.
Redford, Robert (1936– ): US actor, entrepreneur, outdoor
enthusiast,
conservationist.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1712–1778): Swiss-born French writer
and philoso-
pher, perhaps the leading Romantic celebrant of nature of the
eighteenth
century.
Schumacher, E.F. (1911–1977): British economist, author of
Small is
Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered, a highly influential
book published
in 1973 whose thesis is in its title.
Who’s who xv
Seton, Ernest Thompson (1860–1946): Born in England to
Scottish parents
who soon moved to Canada, he moved to the US as an adult and
was a
widely read naturalist and observer of animals.
43. Sewell, Anna (1820–1878): English writer whose sole novel,
Black Beauty,
appeared in 1877 and stimulated a great deal of sympathy for
the plight of
horses.
Singer, Peter (1946– ): Australian philosopher and leading
intellectual of the
animal-rights movement.
Snyder, Gary (1930– ): US poet, radical environmentalist,
leading propo-
nent of bioregionalism.
Tansley, Arthur George (1871–1955): English botanist and
ecologist
who pointed out that communities of plants did not necessarily
evolve in
predictable or stable ways.
Thoreau, Henry David (1817–1862): US transcendentalist,
nature advo-
cate, author of Walden.
Tolkien, J.R.R. (1892–1973): English scholar of literature but
much better
known as author of the wildly popular Lord of the Rings, a
series of novels set
in the fictional past and celebrating nature.
Turner, J.M.W. (1775–1851): Perhaps the leading landscape
painter of
England during the nineteenth century whose work strongly
reflected
Romanticism.
44. Wordsworth, William (1770–1850): English Romantic poet and
champion
of hiking, nature loving.
xvi ENVIRONMENTALISM
Glossary
Animal Liberation Animal-rights movements date back to the
early
nineteenth century. More radical groups formed in the later
decades of the
twentieth century, such as the Animal Liberation Front. These
groups have
both advocated more extreme forms of animal rights, such as
vegetarianism,
and have protested medical research and other forms of animal
cruelty.
Anthropomorphism The practice of imputing human
characteristics and
motives to non-humans. The thickly-drawn line between humans
and
animals began to blur with the spread of pet ownership in
eighteenth-century
Europe, and by the turn of the twentieth century wild animals
who spoke,
wore clothes, and formed human-like families were common in
children’s
and adult literature alike. Though modern ecologists are critical
of anthro-
pomorphism, the belief that animals are essentially people
continues to
45. shape western culture and inspire environmental movements.
Audubon Society This US organization formed in 1905 and led
the fight
against killing birds for their ornamental plumage. In recent
decades it has
become one of America’s largest organizations devoted to
preserving wildlife
habitat, and it has also fostered the hobby of birdwatching.
Bambi This Disney animated movie, based on Sigmund
Salzmann’s novel of
the same name, appeared in 1942. Its protagonist is a young
deer, and it pits
the creatures of the forest against evil hunters.
Boy Scouts Founded by Robert Baden Powell in 1907, the
scouting movement
quickly spread across the western world. It combined military
organization
with outdoor life. It targeted growing numbers of middle-class
boys who would
otherwise have little experience with camping and other aspects
of rural life.
Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament This organization appeared
in 1958 in
Great Britain and spread quickly. Members engaged in many
demonstrations
and lobbying efforts before the organization declined in the
1960s. It became
popular again early in the 1980s.
Chernobyl The 1986 accident at this Ukrainian (then part of the
46. Soviet
Union) nuclear power plant was the most serious in the history
of the world
and provoked widespread concern and protests inside and
outside the
Soviet Union.
Club of Rome This international think tank formed in 1968 to
consider
global political issues. Its most influential publication was
Limits to Growth,
which appeared in 1972 and argued for a widespread
commitment to sus-
tainability rather than continued growth so that the earth could
restore its
environmental equilibrium.
Conservation This broad term became common in the nineteenth
century as
western nations sought to use natural resources such as timber
and water
more wisely and rationally.
Counter-culture The counter-culture blossomed in the mid-
1960s, as
growing numbers of young people rejected the verities of
growth and con-
formity that had long resided at the centre of western
civilization. Although
nurturing radical political movements attacking capitalism,
imperialism,
and racism, the counter-cultural movement was often amorphous
and
more focused on altering people’s consciousnesses than
political structures.
Affinity for nature resided at the heart of the counter-cultural
47. movement and
was expressed symbolically – through having long hair, for
example.
Deep Ecology Norwegian philosopher Arne Naess coined this
term early in
the 1970s. Deep Ecologists argue that humans must be
understood as part
of, rather than separate from, the rest of nature. Deep Ecology
implies and
argues that conventional environmental movements and
philosophies are
shallow by comparison inasmuch as they accept western
civilization’s dualistic
assumption of a human/nature divide and therefore cannot get at
the roots
of why modern humans exploit the nonhuman world.
Earth Day Conceived as a national ‘teach-in’ on the
environment, Earth Day
drew approximately 20 million people – mostly students –
across the US on
April 22, 1970. Probably the biggest demonstration of its very
eventful era,
it was much more celebratory and less shrill than protests
having to do with
war or racism. Subsequent American Earth Day celebrations
were smaller but
spread to other countries.
Earth First! This radical environmental organization emerged in
the 1980s
and quickly spread across much of the western world. Its
members often
participated in creative demonstrations to preserve wilderness
and reduce
48. humanity’s footprint.
Ecofeminism This movement emerged in the 1970s as part of
the growing
radical environmentalist impulse. As its name implies, it
combines feminism
xviii ENVIRONMENTALISM
and environmentalism. Like so-called ‘cultural feminists,’
ecofeminists argue
that women’s biological and psychological processes make them
uniquely
close to nature and that misogyny and hatred of nature share a
common,
masculine root, namely western civilization’s mania for
domination of the
natural and the feminine.
Ecology This scientific field of study arose early in the
twentieth century
and emphasized the relationship between elements of an
environment that
had been studied or approached discretely. Ecologists
understood forests, for
example, as a complex organism whose various parts – plants,
mammals,
insects, soils, bacteria – acted in concert with and relation to
each other.
Many environmentalists since the 1960s have embraced
varieties of ecolog-
ical thought.
Ecotourism This movement emerged in the 1970s and expressed
49. the desires
of many western peoples to enjoy exotic travel in an
environmentally respon-
sible manner. In its pure form, ecotourism is environmentally
and socially
sustainable, respectful of both the integrity of local ecosystems
and busi-
nesses. In practice, any form of tourism ordinarily creates a
great deal of
pollution, and businesses have commonly claimed the
ecotourism label
without substantially altering their practices.
Enlightenment This multi-faceted intellectual and cultural
movement
swept across much of Europe in the eighteenth century.
Proponents of the
Enlightenment shared optimism over human capacity to master
and mani-
pulate the non-human environment.
Federation of Rambling Clubs This organization of groups
concerned with
preserving people’s access to the British countryside formed in
1905, an
effort that had begun nearly a century before. Many Britons
believed that
they should have a right to hike across private property.
Forestry This term refers to the scientific and systematic
management of
forests that emerged in Germany in the eighteenth century and
spread across
the western world. It was at first concerned primarily with the
rational use
of timber and later with maintaining forests to prevent flooding
50. and erosion
and, more recently, as part of sustaining healthy ecosystems.
Friends of the Earth This organization began in the US in the
1970s before
spreading across the globe to become one of the world’s most
influential
environmental groups. By 2002 Friends of the Earth had a total
of 5,000
local groups in 68 countries. Friends of the Earth addressed a
multiplicity of
issues, many of them highly controversial: nuclear power, acid
rain, trapping
fur-bearing animals, toxic waste, over-packaging, and much
more.
Glossary xix
Global warming Scientists had long hypothesized that
industrialization,
through the production of CO2, could lead to global warming by
trapping
warm air in the earth’s atmosphere. The theory gained traction
from
scientists and then from a growing proportion of the public and
politicians
late in the twentieth century. By the 1980s scientists and
policymakers alike
commonly identified global warming as the most serious
environmental
problem confronting the planet.
Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Australians created this park in
1975 to
51. protect the world’s largest reef. The reef had by then become a
very popular
tourist destination.
Greenpeace This radical group emerged in 1969 in Canada and
soon flour-
ished across the western world. It combined both large numbers
of members
and contributors and a dedicated corps of activists who engaged
in creative
and highly publicized protests against such activities as nuclear
testing,
whaling, and pollution.
Kyoto Protocol The plan resulting from the United Nations’
conference in
Japan in 1997 which focused on halting climate change. Nearly
all western
nations agreed to work toward limiting their emissions of
greenhouse gases.
Minimal-impact camping This variety of camping emerged in
the 1970s as
part of the solution to overcrowding in North America’s back
country. Hiking
and camping more carefully served to increase popular areas’
carrying cap-
acities, allowing more people to enjoy them without degrading
the environ-
ment. Low-impact camping entailed using established camping
areas, not
using wood for fuel, and carefully disposing of all waste
products.
National Trust Founded in 1895 by prominent philanthropists,
this soon
52. became the leading organization devoted to preserving natural
and historical
landscapes in Great Britain. It has focused on landscapes
heavily shaped by
humans and on buildings and remained strong and influential at
the turn of
the twenty-first century.
Nationalism This movement emphasized pride of country,
including its
natural features, and emerged across the western world in the
nineteenth
century. It often led to the preservation of places and species
deemed intrinsic
to a nation’s identity.
Parks Parks in areas considered wild became common in the
United States,
Canada, and Australia during the late nineteenth and early
twentieth
centuries and soon spread to Europe.
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) Founded
by Ingrid Newkirk
in the US, PETA had become perhaps the most successful
environmental
xx ENVIRONMENTALISM
organization in the world by the turn of the twenty-first century.
PETA’s
well-developed websites attack pet stores that take insufficient
care of their
animals, animal experimentation, circuses, factory farms, the
53. fur industry,
and fishing, among other activities. PETA blends idealism and
pragmatism.
Its leaders advocate and practise veganism, a form of
vegetarianism that
abjures the eating or use of any animal product, but they also
work to
improve the conditions under which animals such as chickens
and cattle
are raised and slaughtered.
Preservation This broad term emerged late in the nineteenth
century as
growing numbers of people in the western world advocated
setting aside and
protecting lands considered particularly scenic.
Recycling Re-manufacturing material such as paper, metal, and
plastic. It
became common during the 1970s and soon became one of the
most widely
practised forms of conservation, particularly in Europe.
Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit This 1992 United Nations’
conference on the
environment was the largest to date, with 17,000 attendees and
representa-
tives from 172 governments. It explored interrelated problems
of world
poverty, development, pollution, and climate change. The
government rep-
resentatives agreed to join in a global partnership of sustainable
development
and pledged to reduce greenhouse gases, an agreement that was
refined five
years later, at Kyoto, Japan.
54. Romanticism Romanticism emerged from the eighteenth century
Enlightenment
and acted as a counterweight to its more scientific, rational
aspects. Proponents
of Romanticism emphasized the importance of emotion, of
feeling, and
Romantic poets, painters, composers and philosophers
commonly turned to
nature for inspiration and material.
Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
(RSPCA) Founded
in 1824 in London, this organization quickly gained the backing
of influential
people, and in 1840 Queen Victoria allowed it to include
‘Royal’ in its title.
For several decades the society focused on encouraging the
enforcement of
legislation penalizing the abuse of working animals. Later in the
nineteenth
century the RSPCA paid increasing attention to the abuse of
pets and sport-
ing or fighting animals. It spread to much of the British Empire.
Sea Birds Preservation Act This piece of 1869 British
legislation was a land-
mark in the movement toward protecting selected species of
birds.
Sierra Club Founded in 1892 and headed for many years by
John Muir,
the Sierra Club was for many decades the principal advocate of
large parks
and wilderness preservation in the US. It emerged as a potent
political
55. force in the 1960s before being joined by and in some respects
eclipsed by
Glossary xxi
more radical movements. But it remains a strong political force
with a large
membership.
Smoke abatement Concern over air pollution in England grew
along with
industrialization. Strong, effective measures to improve urban
air quality did
not appear until the 1950s, however.
Student movement The student movement emerged across the
western
world in the 1960s on burgeoning university and college
campuses. It soon
focused on broad issues such as war, imperialism and
environmentalism.
The protection of nature implied a critique of both the older
generation and
the status quo. The student movement faded in the 1970s,
though campuses
would remain a fertile ground for groups concerned with social
and environ-
mental reform.
Suburbanization Suburbs began to ring England’s cities in the
first half of the
nineteenth century as improved forms of transit allowed more
and more
prosperous families to live farther away from where they
56. worked and
shopped. This process accelerated with the invention of electric
trolley cars
and of course privately-owned automobiles, and by the 1950s
more people
lived around than inside many large cities of the western world.
Suburban
developments appealed to families who desired to live closer to
nature and
often featured extensive plantings of trees and shrubs and other
landscape
features deemed natural.
Sustainable development This term became popular late in the
1980s and
implied a compromise or rapprochement between economic
development
and environmental protection.
Woodcraft Movement This broad movement emerged in Britain,
North
America, and Europe in the early decades of the twentieth
century. It cham-
pioned camping and other outdoor activities, particularly for
youth.
xxii ENVIRONMENTALISM
T
hi
s
m
65. IA
C
H
IN
A
This page intentionally left blank
Part 1
ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT
This page intentionally left blank
1
Introduction
The project seemed reasonable enough. Americans’
consumption ofenergy continued to climb at the dawn of the
twenty-first century, andwind offered a relatively ‘green’ or
clean source of electricity. Locating
some 170 energy-producing turbines on windy Nantucket
66. Sound, off the
New England coast, would serve area homes and businesses
without the
pollution attached to oil, natural gas, or coal.
But residents and their sympathizers raised $3 million to oppose
the plan,
and they did so in the name of nature preservation. ‘Our
national treasures
should be off limits to industrialisation,’ explained Walter
Cronkite, the retired
news anchor (Burkett, 2003: 48). The wind generators would
not belch
smoke, create acid rain, or require extensive mining. But they
would mar
the horizon, would constitute a pimple on the smooth cheek of
sand, sky,
and ocean.
Of course Cronkite’s ocean-front home consumed a great deal
of nature in
its construction and maintenance, and the power which ran it
had to come
from somewhere. But opponents of the project evidently thought
that people
living inland, where views and property values were more
modest, ought to
bear the burden of producing energy for those whose capacious
living rooms
enjoyed better vistas. Indeed, another opponent of the project
pointed out
that the turbines would be part of a working industry, would not
resemble
the ‘quaint, scenic windmills . . . scattered across the Cape’
(Phadke, 2010: 13).
Nostalgia-inducing remnants of earlier manufacturers were
67. welcome;
modern industry was not (see Plate 8).
The battle over wind-generated power off Cape Cod illustrates
this book’s
salient themes. Environmentalism dwells on the paradoxical
relationship
between prosperity and nature loving. Professions of concern
and affection
for the environment have been most powerful among the eras,
nations, and
people that have most successfully subjected and consumed it.
This rela-
tionship has been, in some respects, logical. Worries over
nature’s wellbeing
should indeed rise as its health is compromised, and
environmentalists have
4 ENVIRONMENTALISM
succeeded in regulating the exploitation of natural resources,
preserving
many parks and other areas, rescuing from extinction many
animals and
plants, and reducing some pollutants.
But nature loving has more often embodied than challenged the
western
march of material progress and comfort. People who buy the
expensive homes
on the shores of Cape Cod may consider themselves refugees
from industrial
capitalism. Yet only the very wealthy can afford the view, a
prized window
68. onto a ‘natural’ world that is every bit as much of a consumer
good as the
luxury cars in the driveway.
We revere nature not so much because it provides us with food,
shelter,
and tools, but because it offers meaning. Western peoples have
become pro-
gressively ignorant of and disinterested in how soil, water,
animals, trees, and
other plants sustain our bodies, more and more adamant that
these things
feed our souls, that they transport us to a pure place beyond our
superficial,
everyday lives.
Most environmental histories do not focus on these sort of
broad cultural
themes. The field has historically divided itself between
scholars who study
how humans have shaped the environment – a sort of blending
of natural
and human history, if you will – and historians who focus on
particular
environmental movements, such as the development of forestry
or nature
reserves.
One problem with this set of approaches is that it skirts one of
the central
ironies in the field: Why have we seen a steady increase in
conservation and
preservation, the setting aside of areas deemed especially scenic
even as
human exploitation of the environment has continued apace?
This book
69. focuses on the recent history of western people’s
understandings of and
sentiments about nature. It is a cultural history of nature loving.
This book will spend considerable ink on the development of
ideas and
practices having to do with the conservation and preservation of
particular
parts of the environment, including some, like forestry, that
have been
highly technical in nature. But we shall study these political and
economic
movements in the context of much broader cultural forces, a
growing
embrace of places, species, and experiences deemed precious
and beneficent:
nature loving. Unlike programmes of rational conservation,
nature loving has
been much more concerned with transcending this world, our
environment,
than with coming to terms with it. Hence upon being confronted
with the
choice of lowering the rate of pollution and climate change or
preserving
a good view, many Cape Cod residents opted for the latter.
Environmentalism explores the recurring tension between
science and
emotion, conservation and preservation. The former has taken
up the
business of establishing a sensible, sustainable way of
interacting with
nature, which is understood as providing humans with life’s
necessities, from
Parks Parks in areas
70. considered wild became
common in the United
States, Canada, and
Australia during the late
nineteenth and early
twentieth centuries and
soon spread to Europe.
Conservation This broad
term became common in
the nineteenth century
as western nations sought
to use natural resources
such as timber and water
more wisely and rationally.
Preservation This broad
term emerged late in
the nineteenth century
as growing numbers of
people in the western
world advocated setting
aside and protecting
lands considered particu-
larly scenic.
Forestry This term refers
to the scientific and
systematic management
of forests that emerged
in Germany in the
eighteenth century and
spread across the west-
ern world. It was at first
concerned primarily with
the rational use of
71. timber and later with
maintaining forests to
prevent flooding and ero-
sion and, more recently,
as part of sustaining
healthy ecosystems.
Introduction 5
building materials to clean air. Preservation has been more
likely to focus
on nature’s intangible gifts – the spiritual or national
regeneration said to
spring from certain places or species.
Class or economic divisions have informed these clashes. Poor
people’s
reliance on plants and animals has often been direct – as has
their experience
of environmental problems like toxic waste. Well-to-do
westerners have been
more apt to perceive nature in abstract or symbolic terms and to
disguise
their reliance on it, like the prosperous Victorians who replaced
vegetable
with flower gardens, chickens and pigs with pets and cast-iron
deer. Ideas
about and movements concerned with nature loving have
provided venues
for people to malign the character of and attack the material
interests of
people different from themselves.
This book’s emphasis on the complexities, divisions, and
72. paradoxes
of environmentalism should not be understood as an indictment
of environ-
mental movements, a brief for unfettered capitalism. But in
exploring the
history of nature loving I have become convinced that many of
our environ-
mental problems are rooted not simply in the western world’s
commitment
to prosperity and growth but also in environmentalism’s
tradition of inco-
herence and irrelevance, its tendency to complement rather than
to confront
the attitudes and practices behind our growing environmental
problems.
I am optimistic and vain enough to hope that Environmentalism
can play
a role in helping a worthy set of impulses and movements
become more
self-reflective and therefore more relevant and effective.
2
Domesticating the wild
Men on trains were not supposed to behave this way. The
gentlemanwas sticking his head out of the window, exposing
himself to thestorm. Finally he withdrew, then sat back, with
eyes closed, as if
trying to memorize the unpleasant sensations he had just
subjected himself to.
Landscape painter J.M.W. Turner’s odd behaviour seemed to
73. make a
mockery of the hard-won comforts of mid-nineteenth-century
England. For
millennia travellers had slowly toiled along at the mercy of the
elements. To
travel several hundred miles overland was the work of weeks or
months,
through all manner of weather. The railroad had finally changed
all of that,
had annihilated time and space, cheated sun, wind, cold, and
rain. So why
was this Englishman sticking his head into the storm?
Europeans had a long legacy of distrusting and trying to
dominate the
environment. Indigenous peoples across the world emphasized
their depend-
ence on a powerful, animate world that had the power to bestow
or withhold
sustenance. East Asians, notwithstanding their technological
achievements,
perceived nature as a potent force that humans ought to
contemplate and
learn from. But Christians viewed untamed nature as a threat to
their
survival, livelihoods, and salvation.
The economic and scientific transformations of the seventeenth
and eigh-
teenth centuries made western people less fearful of nature,
more confident
in their ability to unlock its bounties. Indeed, thoughtful
scientists and
bureaucrats began to realize that woods and soils were being
exploited too
successfully, that without programmes of conservation, nations’
74. future pros-
perity and security would be compromised.
But the emergence of sensible programmes of conservation do
not explain
the spread of sensibilities such as Turner’s, the growing affinity
for a nature
that appealed precisely because it still lay beyond human
control. By the
mid-nineteenth century the most prosperous western peoples
had turned
to nature for instruction and meaning even as they transformed
it into
a machine that predictably produced wheat, timber, and other
crops.
Domesticating the wild 7
BACKGROUND
Christianity dominated medieval Europeans’ views of nature.
The Judeo-
Christian God transcended the earth rather than residing in or
emanating
from it. Worldly existence was a fleeting prelude to eternal,
hopefully
heavenly, life.
Like the Greeks and Romans before them, medieval Christians
asserted
that nature made itself available and useful to humans. Even
Francis of
Assisi, a thirteenth-century figure often invoked by modern
nature lovers,
75. placed humanity squarely at the head of creation. St
Bonaventure noted
approvingly that St Francis had ‘subdued ferocious beasts,
tamed the wild,
trained the tame and bent to his obedience the brute beasts that
had rebelled
against fallen mankind’ (Coates, 1998: 54). When medieval
people expressed
appreciation for nature, they had in mind orderly and productive
fields, land
that they had cleared or drained, and animals that they had
domesticated,
not the uninhabited places where wild beasts, monsters, and
perhaps Satan
himself lurked [Doc. 1, p. 100].
Nature’s toils and fruits alike could distract good Christians
from pursuing
a heavenly reward outside this world. Its terrors – drought,
wolves, trolls, and
worse – could kill, and its pleasures could divert people’s
attention from God.
Then capitalism emasculated nature. Scientists such as Galileo
Galilei,
Francis Bacon, René Descartes, and Isaac Newton described
nature as passive,
a collection of inert materials and mechanistic processes that
humans could
and should manipulate to further their own ends. Leon Battista
Alberti, a
fifteenth-century writer, celebrated ‘the Rocks cut, Mountains
bored through,
Vallies filled up, Lakes confined, Marshes discharged into the
Sea, Ships built,
Rivers turned, their Mouths cleared, Bridges Laid over them,
76. Harbours
formed’ (Glacken, 1967: 464–5). Humanity had found the
golden key to unlock
prosperity’s stubborn door. Transportation, commerce,
agriculture, and industry
accelerated. Yields of wheat and other staples swelled with such
inventions and
innovations as the seed drill, more efficient ploughs and other
implements,
and intensified crop rotations – all the fruits of a more
experimental, scientific,
market-oriented approach to farming. Pastures, heaths, fens, and
marshes
were drained and put to work, forests cut to create space for
more fields.
Western peoples approached nature with less trepidation, more
confidence. Scientists such as Galileo and Descartes reduced
what had been
a mysterious and daunting world to mathematics. The
experimental method,
not passive piety, made the world apprehensible. This optimism
accelerated
with the eighteenth-century Enlightenment, a movement, as its
name
implies, suffused with a spirit of confidence in the ability of
human beings to
fathom and manipulate their world. Progress in abstract and
practical science
validated this growing faith in human reason and intellect.
Christians had
Enlightenment This multi-
faceted intellectual and
cultural movement swept
across much of Europe in
77. the eighteenth century.
Proponents of the Enligh-
tenment shared optimism
over human capacity
to master and manipu-
late the non-human
environment.
8 ENVIRONMENTALISM
previously understood dominion over the earth as an unmerited
gift from
God. Now that dominion, made much more complete, was their
own hard-
won achievement. God had become a remote entity that set the
universe in
motion and then stood aside as people seized their futures.
Practical men of
the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries created machines
for spinning
and weaving cotton, harnessing steam, harvesting crops, and
casting metals,
all of which multiplied the rate at which food, minerals, and
wood were
extracted from the earth and bent to human will.
THE BIRTH OF CONSERVATION
But growing numbers of Europeans realized that their new
machines and
techniques could endanger the very prosperity they had
fostered. Agriculture
had less to do with subsistence, with feeding local populations,
more to
78. do with generating money by producing crops for distant
markets. But these
shifts put more pressure on the land. Thoughtful farmers
compensated by
rotating crops more carefully, using legumes such as peas and
clover to
restore nitrogen to depleted soils, for example.
Others worried about the consequences of shrinking forests.
Sixteenth-
century landslides and floods provoked a ban on logging in
parts of Florence.
Germans began noticing wood shortages around 1600, and in the
late
eighteenth century they began regulating logging in an attempt
to provide a
reliable annual supply of firewood and building material. The
first forestry
school appeared in 1763 and was accompanied by many articles
and books
on the subject. ‘From the State Forest not more and not less may
be taken
annually than is possible on the basis of good management by
permanent
sustained yield,’ remarked a 1795 text (Rubner, 1984: 171). The
Danes
created Forest Acts in 1763 and 1805, with the latter set of
regulations
requiring both preservation and replanting. Russia’s reform-
minded Peter the
Great touted forest preservation as a means to both slow erosion
and ensure
a reliable supply of oak trees for masts in the early eighteenth
century.
The French expressed similar concerns as early as the twelfth
century.
79. Their Forest Ordinance of 1669, though routinely ignored,
covered human
activities from grazing and charcoal production to logging, even
how many
seed-bearing trees were to be left standing.
Forestry became not an exercise in cutting down trees as
quickly as pos-
sible, but a process of establishing rational, even mathematical,
equations to
ensure that trees were utilized with maximum, long-term
efficiency.
This emphasis on conservation, on using natural resources in a
sustain-
able manner, flew in the face of western tradition and local
demands, but it
Domesticating the wild 9
fitted well the requirements of the new science and the modern
economy.
Trees could best be understood as timber, as material to be
converted into
fuel, fences, houses, and railroad ties. Like the earth itself, they
were expan-
sive yet finite and ought therefore to be used judiciously.
Empirical study and
mathematical equations should determine the rate at which they
should be
cut and the uses to which they should be put. Forestry was a
scientific study
in which specially trained humans used reason to address
concrete, practical
80. problems.
Natural history in some ways resembled forestry. The rational
exploitation
of the earth’s flora and fauna, after all, required an exhaustive
cataloguing of
those commodities. Botanists and other collectors commonly
accompanied
explorers such as Captain James Cook because the sponsors of
such expedi-
tions wanted to know the commercial and agricultural potential
of lands that
they hoped to colonize.
But by the eighteenth century a growing array of enthusiastic
amateurs
who gathered plants and insects in the fields and hills around
their homes
had joined the self-conscious professionals. These collectors
eventually
formed natural history societies, such as the British Association
for the
Advancement of Science. British publishers produced books on
natural
history that sold very, very well in the nineteenth century, and
British news-
papers included natural history sections. ‘By the middle of the
century, there
was hardly a middle-class drawing-room in the country that did
not contain
an aquarium, a fern-case, a butterfly cabinet, a seaweed album,
a shell
collection, or some other evidence of a taste for natural history’
(Barber,
1980: 13). Natural history collecting and societies spread to
Canada and
81. other English colonies.
These collectors were fired by several impulses, not all of them
instru-
mental. The amateurs, to be sure, believed that they were
advancing
scientific knowledge. They fitted their discoveries into an
interminable Linnaean
catalogue of nested classification in which plants, animals, and
minerals were
assigned places in an extensive but fixed hierarchy. The
collectors ‘were
strong on staying power, weak by comparison on speculation
and insight’
(Allen, 1976: 820). Status accrued to those who assembled and
organized the
most specimens and facts. Unlike twentieth-century ecologists,
they were not
much interested in how their insects or plants related to
everything else. This
interest in the jots and tittles, the genus and species, of beetles
and ferns
embodied the Enlightenment confidence that nature could be,
literally, pinned
down, that it could be sorted and contained in a finite, if vast,
system of
kingdoms, classes, and genera. Nature was a static collection of
species and
data that could and would be fully defined, not a dynamic set of
interactions.
Discovering, describing, and cataloguing the world’s flora and
fauna repre-
sented Europeans’ growing sense of mastery over the natural
world.
82. 10 ENVIRONMENTALISM
NOSTALGIA AND NATURE LOVING
Yet amateur naturalists also looked backward, to a time when
nature con-
stituted not a scientific laboratory, but God’s handiwork. They
were apt to be
pious Protestants, particularly Quakers, for whom plants,
insects, and shells
suggested the beautiful, intricate, and wondrous work of God’s
creation,
‘through Nature up to Nature’s God,’ as British collectors liked
to put it
(Lowe, 1983: 333).
European gardens illustrated the same ambivalence over man’s
growing
power. By the time of the Reformation, in the 1520s, Italians
had the most
elaborate and celebrated. Fine gardens spread north, with
economic growth.
Holland’s urban elite purchased country estates in the
seventeenth century
that they surrounded with elaborate arrangements of plants,
especially
foreign and flowering varieties. These gardens provided a foil
to wild land-
scapes. They served not simply to please the eye, but to
demonstrate how
human artifice made nature orderly and pleasant.
Gardens also performed political functions. The overwhelming
Versailles
gardens of Louis XIV, which consumed more water than the
83. 600,000
denizens of Paris, suggested that a monarch who could so
successfully con-
trol nature should also control his nation. The ability to make a
thousand
flowers bloom betokened a sort of supernatural command of the
rest of
creation. Likewise, the tree-lined avenues leading up to
important people’s
homes connoted power as well as taste.
Yet the unprecedented wealth of the eighteenth century brought
gardens
that were not only larger, but less orderly. Geometric and rigid
landscapes –
patent in their human artifice – gave way to less linear
arrangements of
plants, hills, water, and temples. These gardens required a great
deal of inter-
vention, not only in planting and cultivating various types of
vegetation, but
also in fashioning the very features that lent the gardens such a
‘natural’
appearance. An English landscape garden created in 1764
included a
forty-acre lake. Indeed, the fences that separated the gardens
around British
estates from the fields and woods (and cows) beyond them were
sunken so
as not to jar people’s line of vision, to blur purposefully the
division between
two very different landscapes. From the windows of aristocratic
homes, no
discernible line separated the contrived and calculated nature of
the garden
from the relatively unkempt lands beyond them.
84. Eighteenth-century landscape gardens fed people’s souls. The
Duke of
Buckingham wrote that ‘the works of nature appear to me the
better sort of
sermons; and every flower contains in it the most edifying
rhetorick, to fill
us with the admiration of its omnipotent Creator.’ A half
century later,
in 1755, writer Edward Young turned Milton on his head by
asserting: ‘A
garden to the virtuous is a paradise still extant; a paradise
unlost’ (Coffin,
Domesticating the wild 11
1994: 67, 69). As God became more remote, flowers and other
domesticated
plants became not simply tokens of the creator’s blessings but
emblems of
perfection in and of themselves. Well-to-do Britons alarmed
religious author-
ities by choosing their gardens over their churchyards as burial
grounds, as
if to say that these places were their Eden, and their heaven,
too.
Western Europe’s leading artists and intellects embraced nature.
Words-
worth, Keats, Shelley, Coleridge, Blake, Goethe, Balzac,
Beethoven, Berlioz,
Liszt, and Wagner turned to the non-human world for
inspiration.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau inaugurated the movement in the mid-
85. eighteenth
century when he turned the rational wing of the Enlightenment
on its ear by
celebrating ‘primitive’ people as authentic and independent
precisely because
they lived outside the artificiality and selfishness of civilized,
urban life.
‘I closed all my books,’ explains one of his characters. ‘There is
one book
open to all eyes, that of nature’ (Gay, 1977: 547). Nature served
to stimulate
modern people’s souls and imaginations, fostering a healthy,
reflective indi-
vidualism. Like other Enlightenment writers, Rousseau had an
optimistic
view of the human condition. He denied the religious and
political ortho-
doxies of the day, that human beings were abject sinners
incapable of
thinking for or governing themselves.
Individualism resided at the heart of this cult of nature loving.
‘I rustle
with the wind,’ wrote German philosopher Johann Gottfried von
Herder,
‘and become alive – give life – inspire – I inhale fragrance, and
exhale it with
the flowers; I dissolve in water; I float in blue sky; I have all
these feelings’
(Cartmill, 1993: 116). The poet William Wordsworth believed
that nature
and human consciousness mirrored each other: ‘. . . what I saw/
Appeared
like something in myself, a dream,/ A prospect in my mind’
(Brennan, 1987:
55). Wordsworth found in nature not a collection of substances
86. to be
studied and prodded and put to good use, but divinity itself. The
contem-
plation of nature could and should be intensely and personally
mystical
and enlightening – a religious experience [Doc. 2, p. 102].
Ludwig Van
Beethoven, one of the era’s consummate and crotchety
individualists, pro-
fessed himself ‘only happy in the midst of untouched nature’
(Schauffler,
1933: 261). Romantics embraced the self and nature, the natural
self.
Nature was not always agreeable. True, many aesthetes
celebrated a
picturesque, quaint nature. The movement peaked in the 1790s
in England,
where John Constable’s paintings offered a harmonious palette
of trees, fields,
sky, and rural folk, a countryside shaped but hardly spoiled by
humanity. But
more and more artists turned from the picturesque to the
sublime, from the
pleasant to the forceful. Beethoven pioneered the use of
dissonant, even
sinister musical compositions, and his evocations of nature, as
in his Sixth
Symphony, featured a fearsome storm as well as pastoral
themes. Wordsworth
described solitary, dark pools surrounded by ‘huge stones and
masses of
12 ENVIRONMENTALISM
87. rock,’ a vista that ‘excites a sense of some repulsive power
strongly put forth
and thus deepens the melancholy natural to such scenes’ (Byatt,
1970:
273–4). Nature could be ‘awful & immeasurable.’ Likewise, the
landscape
painter J.M.W. Turner forsook pleasant British country scenes
for indistinct,
menacing representations. To capture the terror of a storm at sea
he asked to
be lashed to a ship’s mast for several hours, an ordeal so awful
that ‘I did not
expect to escape’ (Brennan, 1987: 79, 90). The fear this
experience induced
is palpable in The Slave Ship, a painting in which indistinct sea
monsters
devour slaves that have been pitched from a vessel swallowed
by malignant,
squatting clouds (see Plate 1).
Picturesque depictions of nature invited people to feel good
about nature.
The sublime, like other elements of Romanticism, simply
required them to
feel – and strongly. In either event, nature provided a sanctuary
that excised
banal society so that the solitary, sensitive soul could connect
with primal
forces and emotions.
These ideas soon spread beyond artists and intellectuals.
Intrigued by
Rousseau’s celebration of primitivism, Marie Antoinette and her
retinue
played at being peasants in the gardens of Versailles. The
88. growing urban,
middle class was particularly interested in celebrating nature.
Mountains and
seas had long been regarded as dreadful and threatening places
unsusceptible
to improvement. Now the burgeoning cities had become
degraded and
diseased, less populated places vivifying and restorative.
THE BIRTH OF NATURE TOURISM
The search for pastoral peace created a rural tourist industry. By
the 1780s
guide books directed sensitive tourists to Rousseau’s
Hermitage, where he
had written some of his most influential works. Germans
flocked to the
Rhineland for inspiration, a pilgrimage facilitated by steamship
and then rail
travel. ‘Between Mainz and Cologne,’ observed an engraver in
1840, ‘hardly
a house, hardly a tree can be found which has not set in motion
a pen or
a gouge’ (Lekan, 2004: 26). Wordsworth was hosting some 500
visitors
annually to his home in the Lake District by the 1840s, where
his poems
instructed less articulate souls what to feel as they trekked
across the
landscape he had made famous.
Genteel tourists were soon worrying that their less-cultivated
counterparts
did not approach nature properly. Wordsworth wrote several
editions of a
guidebook to his beloved Lake District between 1810 and 1842,
89. which he
hoped would be of use to ‘the Minds of Persons of taste, and
feeling for
Landscape’ (Buzard, 1993: 30). But as growing numbers of
travellers flocked
northward, he fretted over ‘cheap trains pouring out their
hundreds at a time
Romanticism Roman-
ticism emerged from
the eighteenth century
Enlightenment and acted
as a counterweight
to its more scientific,
rational aspects. Pro-
ponents of Romanticism
emphasized the impor-
tance of emotion, of feel-
ing, and Romantic poets,
painters, composers and
philosophers commonly
turned to nature for
inspiration and material.
Domesticating the wild 13
along the margin of Windermere,’ that the countryside would
soon be
plagued by ‘wrestling matches, horses and boat races without
number’
(Ousby, 1990: 192). A wealthy woman complained that the
Derbyshire
valley was defaced by
90. throngs of mill hands . . . tearing through the fields like swarms
of devas-
tating locusts, and dragging the fern and hawthorn boughs they
had torn
down in the dust, ending the lovely spring day in pot houses,
drinking
gin and bitters, or heavy ales by the quart, and tumbling pell-
mell into the
night train . . . sodden, tipsy, yelling, loathsome creatures, such
as make
the monkey look a king.
(Winter, 1999: 211)
The same thing was happening in North America. Niagara Falls,
on
the border of Canada and the US, moved from being ‘the
ultimate test of the
“civilized” man or woman’s ability to feel deeply . . . to hear
Nature speak,’ to
a mere tourist destination. A writer in 1846 complained that the
site was plagued
with ‘Chinese pagoda, menagerie, camera obscura, museum,
watch-tower,
wooden monument, sea gardens, “curiosity shops” ’ ( Jasen,
1995: 33, 43).
European and especially English beaches were similarly
transformed. The
waters of mineral and hot springs had long been celebrated for
their healing
properties. By the early eighteenth century physicians were
prescribing salt-
water bathing. This recommendation, coupled with a growth in
disposable
incomes, brought a trickle and then a stream of vacationers to
91. English
resorts. The bathers were soon appreciating more than the
ocean’s water.
Many, ubiquitous guidebooks in hand, collected seashells or
seaweed. Shells
and pebbles could be arranged into intricate mementos of a stay
at the beach.
Other, more ambitious collectors, started (short-lived)
aquariums.
The ocean itself drew many pilgrims. Its boundless expanses
provided the
anvil upon which artists and other aesthetes could forge their
identities and
refine their sensibilities. Fishing villages had turned their backs
to the threat-
ening sea, seeking refuge and vistas inland. But in the early
nineteenth
century resorts began staking out ground near the water’s edge
and installing
large windows where visitors could absorb ‘all the grandeur of
the storm’
while staying warm and dry.
As in Wordsworth’s Lake District, more Spartan nature lovers
lamented
the commercialization of what they argued should be a more
elemental expe-
rience. ‘What are they doing here?’ asked a man observing a
group of stock-
brokers at the seaside. ‘If they had true relish of the ocean,’ he
wondered,
‘why have they brought all this land luggage with them?’
(Howell, 1974: 46).
But – then as now – nature loving and comfort in fact correlated
92. more
often than not. By the mid-nineteenth century, middle-class
English families
were going to the seaside for a month or more, soaking in the
resplendent
14 ENVIRONMENTALISM
ocean even as they enjoyed most, if not all, of the amenities of
home. By that
date seaside resorts were also common in southern Europe and
the eastern
US. This would not be the first time that the people most
insulated from
nature’s bite, people who had time and money on their hands,
were the most
apt to celebrate its beneficence and beauty.
PETS
Prosperity also reworked people’s relationships with animals.
Oxen, cattle,
and other creatures had played a key role in Europe’s economic
transforma-
tion. By the fourteenth century the average European used much
more
animal power than his or her counterpart in China or Africa, let
alone the
Americas. But urbanization and economic growth removed a
larger and
larger proportion of people from direct contact with working
animals. Pets
stepped into the breach. Royal menageries expanded during the
seventeenth
93. century. Louis XIV kept ostriches, camels, elephants,
crocodiles, and gazelles,
animals from across the Mediterranean lands that he dominated.
Like the
elaborate gardens of Versailles, such collections served political
and imperial
ends by suggesting the long reach of his power. Royals and
aristocrats of the
sixteenth and seventeenth centuries kept animals as pets,
especially dogs,
a practice that soon spread to the growing urban middle class.
Dogs, cats,
squirrels, monkeys, tortoises, otters, rabbits, mice, hedgehogs,
toads, and a
variety of birds made themselves at home among the bourgeois.
Song birds
were popular in London by the late seventeenth century.
Pets became quasi-family members. They typically lived
indoors and
might go to church. They seldom performed work and certainly
were not to
be eaten. Pets showed up in family portraits and graveyards, and
not a few
owners expected to meet their departed friends in heaven, since
dogs had
souls, too (see Plate 2). Russian writers suggested that dogs
committed
suicide when their masters died.
The multiplication of pets engendered attempts at animal
protection by
the late eighteenth century in Great Britain. Some became so
enamoured of
birds that they abjured putting any type on their plates – and
criticized their
94. Italian and French counterparts for being so barbarous as to
keep consum-
ing them. The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
appeared in
the 1820s in London and quickly gained influential members.
Bull-baiting,
the practice of setting dogs or other animals on bulls, was
banned in 1835,
cock-fighting in 1849 [Doc. 3, p. 106]. France’s Society for
Protection of
Animals denounced bullfighting and using dogs to pull carts.
The affinity of members of the middle class for animals, like
their love of
the outdoors, reflected their economic and social position.
Lamenting animal
cruelty served to criticize both the idle aristocracy for hunting
wild and the
Domesticating the wild 15
struggling lower classes for abusing domesticated animals.
Popular forms of
amusement such as cock- or dog-fighting also offended the
reformers. Bloody,
working-class spectacles were out of step with the emerging
Victorian ethos
of self-restraint and public order.
Prosperous animal lovers liked to point out that the lower
classes should
learn from, rather than exploit, animals, creatures that accepted
their station
in life and went about their work cheerfully, without complaint.
95. Victorian
animal lovers reserved their highest praise for creatures that
exhibited the
most subservience (dogs much more so than cats) or that
performed the
most beneficial work (horses). Elephants were one of the few
wild animals to
receive much respect, as they purportedly surrendered their
freedom to work
cheerfully for humans. If only servants could be so tractable.
Concern for animal welfare also constituted a platform from
which the
growing middle class could criticize the indolent rich. By the
late eighteenth
century country gentlemen were creating gargantuan cattle and
oxen that
could carry more and more meat. The British were proud of
consuming more
flesh than their continental counterparts, particularly the
French. Beef – on
the plate or in the field – represented British superiority. But
the fat-laden,
monumental creatures that aristocrats produced stood for more
narrow con-
cerns: the wealth and magnificence of their owners. Indeed, less
prosperous
Britons found these creatures more grotesque than useful. They
were incap-
able of sustained labour and produced gelatinous, unsavoury
meat. These
excrescences of aristocratic vanity were ‘a collection of
agricultural luxuries’
fattened by ‘Dukes and Earls’ who ‘can afford a fancy, whether
it is the pur-
chase of a Titian [painting], or the production of a prize
96. bullock.’ A clergy-
man criticized the practice from even higher moral ground and
wondered
if the creation and showing of animals suffering from
‘overwhelming and
torturing obesity’ did not constitute a ‘cruel and unchristian
exhibition’
(Ritvo, 1987: 72, 75).
The growing concern for animals was circumscribed and
conditional.
Sympathy for the wellbeing of congenial dogs and horses was
accompanied
in England by a ruthless slaughter of those deemed deleterious
to human
endeavours: rats and moles, of course, but also badgers and
hedgehogs.
Animals, like people, were expected to be useful.
ENVIRONMENTALISM IN THE COLONIES
AND EARLY US
Nature remained utilitarian in Europe’s colonies. Settlers in the
Americas and
the Pacific were too concerned with overcoming nature to give
much thought
to protecting or celebrating it.
16 ENVIRONMENTALISM
But the young US constituted something of an exception, not so
much
because of its growing prosperity, rather because of its
distinctive and potent
97. strain of nationalism.
Here, as in so many other fields, Thomas Jefferson played a
crucial role.
The Virginia planter was among the nation’s most enthusiastic
and skilled
naturalists, and he itched to put the lie to George Louis Leclerc
de Buffon’s
theory of American degeneracy. Buffon, the most celebrated
naturalist of the
day, found ample natural grounds for American inferiority. The
unimpressive
size of North America’s mammals and the purported lack of
agricultural and
technological accomplishments by its indigenous peoples
indicated that the
continent could produce only ‘cold men and feeble animals’
(Semonin, 2000:
125). Jefferson’s Notes on Virginia, written during the
American Revolution,
countered this theory. Did not American bears, for example,
weigh twice as
much as their European counterparts? Jefferson went so far as
to send Buffon
a large panther skin and the skeleton of an American moose. If
bigger were
better, the new nation had nothing to be ashamed of.
These sorts of sentiments multiplied after the US achieved its
inde-
pendence. Clearly the young nation could not compete with its
European
counterparts in the conventional measures of civilization: art
and architec-
ture. But America’s weakness, its newness, could be made a
virtue. Enthused
98. a patriot in 1833:
What are the temples which Roman robbers have reared, – what
are the
towers in which feudal oppression has fortified itself, – what
are the
blood-stained association of the one, or the despotic
superstitions of
the other, to the deep forests which the eye of God has alone
pervaded,
and where Nature, in her unviolated sanctuary, has for ages laid
her fruits
and flowers on His altar!
(Nash, 2001: 73)
‘Nature’s nation’s’ want of cathedrals and castles underscored
its inno-
cence and virtue, its democracy. Its unsurpassed forests and
mountains
offered proof enough of God’s favour – and a fresh canvas on
which God’s
chosen people would create the mightiest and best nation of all,
the New
Jerusalem.
That God’s chosen nation was ploughing up, cutting down, and
otherwise
subduing the very wilderness that distinguished it was an irony
lost on the
young country’s patriots. In the century following the American
Revolution
they quickly spread across the continent, laying waste to
forests, grasslands,
predators, and other animals with good cheer and industry. It
would not be
99. the last time that nature’s loudest partisans would be its most
ambitious
destroyers.
Nationalism This move-
ment emphasized pride
of country, including
its natural features, and
emerged across the
western world in the
nineteenth century. It
often led to the preser-
vation of places and
species deemed intrinsic
to a nation’s identity.
Domesticating the wild 17
Nature conservation had become well developed in western
Europe by the
mid-nineteenth century. Germany and other nations had by then
realized
that a reliable supply of timber required active management by
specialized
scientists – foresters – who would determine the time and place
and rate of
harvesting and a substantial bureaucracy to enforce forestry
laws.
But most expressions of concern over and affinity for nature
were less
calculated and logical. Natural history societies devoted to the
collection and
exhibition of nature’s bounty dotted western Europe and some
100. of its colonies.
Pets and gardens were commonplace, especially in England,
where people
inside and outside the Royal Society for the Prevention of
Cruelty to
Animals (RSPCA) were lamenting the suffering of some
animals. Educated
Christians no longer feared the rugged mountains and seashores
but sought
from them, in paintings and on vacation, meaning and
transcendence.
The sprawling landscape gardens of English and Welsh country
estates
perhaps best expressed the paradoxical relationship between
conservation
and efficiency on the one hand and nature appreciation on the
other. The
owners of such estates made their bread and butter by enclosing
what had
once been marginal land used by villages. Sometimes they
absorbed and
destroyed even the villages themselves. The profit-minded
capitalists culti-
vated these expanded fields more intensively and efficiently –
by turning
forests into tree plantations of rapidly growing softwoods, such
as larch and
pine, for example.
But the casual eye would not have detected such enterprises
from the
windows of the manor house. These domestic views were
carefully con-
structed to include broad expanses of lawn, noble oaks, placid
lakes, perhaps
101. some faux ruins evoking ancient Rome. A few cattle grazed in
the distance,
near a church steeple or, better yet, the crumbling walls of an
old castle.
Like the residents of expensive beach homes at the turn of the
twenty-first
century, the owners of these estates drew a thick line between
the increas-
ingly commercialized and rationalized nature that supported
their prosperity
and the nature of the drawing room, garden, library, concert
hall, and vacation
destination. Nature provided both wealth and a counterbalance
to wealth.
That is why nature loving advanced most quickly in England,
the nation
that had most fully subdued it, among people of ample
education and leisure
who were most insulated from its vagaries.
This ironic relationship between material progress and nature
loving
would become more widespread and intense in the century
preceding the
Second World War. Western people would have more reasons
than before
to conserve nature for purposes that were both rational and
irrational,
economic and spiritual.
Royal Society for the
Prevention of Cruelty
to Animals (RSPCA)
Founded in 1824 in
102. London, this organiza-
tion quickly gained the
backing of influential
people, and in 1840
Queen Victoria allowed
it to include ‘Royal’ in its
title. For several decades
the society focused on
encouraging the enforce-
ment of legislation
penalizing the abuse of
working animals. Later in
the nineteenth century
the RSPCA paid increas-
ing attention to the
abuse of pets and sport-
ing or fighting animals. It
spread to much of the
British Empire.
3
Industrial nature loving
One can read a lot of books extolling the virtues of western
environ-mentalism without running across the name of Hermann
Göring.Yet the notorious Nazi leader expressed a great deal of
affinity and
concern for nature. Like many of his colleagues, including
Hitler, he believed
that German identity and strength resided in its natural
landscape and that
the nation’s wellbeing depended on the preservation of those
features. A