its cover some points regarding Mendel Experiment and detail molecular characterization of seven characters of garden pea. Its journey from 1866 to 2016 or factors to gene or mendel to molecular and its 150 year long journey
6. 1
5
4
3
2
Removed stamens
from purple flowerTransferred sperm-
bearing pollen from
stamens of white
flower to egg-
bearing carpel of
purple flower
Parental
generation
(P)
Pollinated carpel
matured into pod
Carpel
(female)
Stamens
(male)
Planted seeds
from pod
Examined
offspring:
all purple
flowers
First
generation
offspring
(F1)
Selection of material for
experiment
Collection of material
3/7/2016 6MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
7. 1. Length of stem
2. Color of stem
3. Size of leaves
4. Form of leaves
5. Position of flower
6. Color of flower
7. Size of flower
8. Length of flower
stalk
9. Color of pods
10.Form of pods
11.Size of pods
12.Form of seeds
13.Size of seeds
14.Color of seed coat
15.Color of
albumin(cotyledon)
Pisum sativum
Phaseolus nanus,
Pisum saccharatum
3/7/2016 7MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
10. Dominant traits Recessive traits Ratios of dominant
and recessive in F2
generation
No. of plant
observe
Round seed Wrinkle seed 2.98:1 5474:1850
Yellow seed Green seed 3.01:1 6022:2001
Inflated seed Constricted pod 2.95:1 822:299
Green pod Yellow pod 2.82:1 428:152
Purple flower White flowers 3.14:1 705:224
Flower on stem Flower at tip 3.14:1 651:207
Tall stem Dwarf stem 2.84:1 787:277
Average ratio of all
traits
3:1
Ratios of Dominant to Recessive in Mendel’s plants
3/7/2016 10MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
11. • ‘‘Versuche’’ : cited 15 times 1865-1899
• Most unfortunately, his scientific records were
apparently burned around the time of his
death (Olby, 1985; Orel, 1996).
3/7/2016 11MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
13. Pea genetics and genomics
• The standard Pea comprises seven SEVEN
linkage group
• Different types of polymorphism in pea
genomes
3/7/2016 13MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
14. • latest consensus map published in pea (2011)
which includes
– Functional markers(214),
– SSR(180),
– RAPD(133)
– Morphological markers(3).
3/7/2016 14MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
15. • Completed and annotated genomes of five
model legumes like –
• Comparative genomics is potential tool
3/7/2016 15MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
17. • International Pea Genome Sequencing
Consortium
• John Innes pisum collection – JI5 and five
other related are referred as mummy plant
have fascinated character
3/7/2016 17MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
18. Seed shape
•Bhattacharyya et al., (1990)
•Controlled by R locus (rugous)
•Linkage group V
•JI15(RR) JI1194(rr)
3/7/2016 18MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
19. Compound Round seed Wrinkle seed
Starch (% dwt) 45-49 33-36
Amylose (% total starch) 33 71
Sucrose (% dwt) 5-7 9-12
Lipid (% dwt) 2.4 4.2
Legumin (% protien) 33 36
Composition of mature round and wrinkle seed
•Effect of higher sugar content
•Lack of starch biosynthesis pathway
3/7/2016 19MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
21. SBE1 enzyme lack in rr line
• Antibody raised against SBE1
protien and conduct the
western bloting
• Bond at 114 kDa in RR line
3/7/2016 21MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
22. Cloning of cDNA for SBE1 gene
• Screening cDNA library in gt11 of RR line
• pJSBE5 (2.7kb) clone
• Northern blot analysis
3/7/2016 22MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
23. • Molecular organization of
the cDNA
Genomic DNA of near
isogenic line ( RR and rr)
digested with EcoRI, EcoRV,
and HindIII and probed with
pJSBE5
4.1kb
3.3 kb
3/7/2016 23MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
24. Linkage analysis
of the SBE1 gene
and ‘r’ locus
JI15(RR) JI1194(rr)
40 F6 plants
3/7/2016 24MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
25. Molecular analysis of the insertion in the rr
allele
pJSBE206
3/7/2016 25MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
26. Southern blot
genomic DNA
were
hybridized
with the HincII
fragments
from pJSBE102
and pJSBE206
3/7/2016 26MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
27. • compare sequences the
ends of pJSBE102 and
pJSBE206
• Insertion was located in exon
• inserted sequence had 12
inverted repeats at its
termini flanked by 8bp direct
repeats from SBE1 gene
5’……..AGTAGAATTAGGGGTGGCAAAA……………………………….AATTGCCACCCCTAAGTAGAAT………3’
Ips-r
3/7/2016 27MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
28. • These 12 inverted repeats have high homology with
Ac transposon of maize
3/7/2016 28MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
30. Stem length
•Lester et al.,
(1997) Martin et al., (1997)
•Stem length is governed by Le
locus linkage group III
Alaska (Le), line 58(le)3/7/2016 30MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
31. • Role of various harmones
• Gibberelic acid
• GA20 GA1
• GA1 is bioactive form
• Dwarfism because reduced endogenes activity
of GA1
3/7/2016 31MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
32. • GA20 GA1
• Lack of 3- hydroxylase in dwarf plants
• Mutation in 3- hydroxylase enocode gene
• Dwarf gene in other species like dwarf 1 in
maize, rice dy, Arabidopsis ga4
GA 3- hydroxylation
3/7/2016 32MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
33. Isolation of GA4 related gene from Pea plant
• Screening of pea cDNA library (Alaska) with
portion of arabidopsis GA4 cDNA produced
Partial cDNA – pDO3c probe
• pDO3c that shows high homology
• 2ODD , the family of enzyme to which GA 3-
hydroxylase belongs
• This enable the isolation of full length le and
Le genomic sequence.
3/7/2016 33MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
34. • Genomic DNA gel blot
analysis with pOD3c
and digest with EcoRI,
EcoRV, HindIII
• RFLP only seen with
HindIII
3/7/2016 34MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
35. Restriction mapping of GA4 related gene in pea
• 1.2kb fragment spanning RFLP region is amplified by PCR
and digest with HindIII
•PCR product of LE line remain intact(1.2kb band) where as
le produce 0.2kb and 1 kb band
3/7/2016 35MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
36. • Linkage analysis of GA4 related gene with stem
length
•All dwarf plants
1.0- and 0.2-kb
bands only.
• Tall plants 1.2, 1 .O,
and 0.2 kb,
• Some tall plants
1.2-kb band only
3/7/2016 36MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
37. Comparision of GA4 gene of arabidopsis with pea GA4
related gene
• A 2.2-kb fragment encompassing the coding region, the TATA
sequence, and some of the flanking sequence of the GA4-
related gene from the Le line
• By comparing the open reading frame of the Le allele with
GenBank sequences, we determined that this sequence is
most highly matched with the GA4 cDNA
• The 1122-bp nucleotide sequence is 61 % identical to the
GA4 cDNA, which translates to an identity of 53% for the
predicted 374-amino acid
3/7/2016 37MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
38. Alignment of Deduced Amino Acid Sequences of the Pea (Le) GA 3P-Hydroxylase
Gene and the Arabidopsis GA4 gene
3/7/2016 38MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
39. Mutation study in le allele
• Extra two nucleotide bases, AT, in intron
region (1954) HindIII polymorphism
• G to A transition in exon region (2654)
amino acid changes
3/7/2016 39MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
40. • le line code for threonin instead of alanine in
tall plant (229)
3/7/2016 40MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
41. Cotyledon color in pea
• Sato et al.,2007
• I locus present on LG1
• Yellow cotyledon(II/Ii) and green cotyledon(ii)
3/7/2016 41MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
42. • Mechanism takes place at the time of
senescence
– Unmasking the pre-existing caretinoids compound
– Existing chlorophyll degradation
• In higher plants chlorophyll exist – chl a and
chl b
• Chl a contain PSI and PSII
3/7/2016 42MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
43. Chlorophyll
Chlo b Chlo a
Chlorophyllide a
(chide a)
Pheophorbide a
(Pheide a)
Red chlorophyll
reductase
Chlorophyllase
Mg+2
oxygenase
Chlo b reductase
3/7/2016 43MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
44. All these SGR genes present in almost all
plants, these are conserved sequence
3/7/2016 44MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
45. • Stay Green Mutant
• SGR yellow color and sgr retain greenness
• Nonfunctional SGR
– lls1/acd1/Pao (Maize)
– Nyc1 (Rice)
– Sgr (Rice)
Mutation is independent
3/7/2016 45MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
46. Mendel’s Green Cotyledon Mutation Is a Stay-Green
Mutation
chl a and chlo b content
after 12 days of dark
induced
3/7/2016 46MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
47. Sequence of SGR gene in pea
Prepare cDNA clones of both isolines
Primers from sequenced gene
• Pao, NYC1,
SGR
degenerate
PCR
• Partial
sequence
of genes
inverse PCR
and 3’-RACE
Full lentgh
sequence
3/7/2016 47MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
49. • Analysis of PsSGR genome sequence
• PCR analysis of 3rd intron
in parents
3/7/2016 49MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
50. Mutation study in PsSGR
• Difference inPsSGRJI2775 and PsSGRJI4 sequence:
In sequence of nucleotides In sequence of amino acids (clustal W)
A- T substitution Thr Ser at amino acid 12 (T12S)
T A substitution Asp Lys at amino acid 38 (N38K)
6 bp insertion
two-amino acid insertion of Ile and
Leu at 189
3/7/2016 50MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
51. OsSGR cDNA
Insertion of 6-bp at the site
corresponding PsSGRJI2775
Insert the constract into sgr
mutant
Restore the stay green
mutation
3/7/2016 51MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
53. FLOWER COLOR
•Hellen et. al in 2010
•Flower color governed by A locus
•Linkage group II
3/7/2016 53MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
54. • Phenyl alanine----> anthocyanin----> Purple
flower
• MYB or bHLH transcription factor or WD40
protien
• Disruption of these above regulation gene
lead to white flower production
3/7/2016 54MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
57. Seven exon and six introns
92% sequence identical to the between two clones
Sixteen SNP found in open reading frame of bHLH
gene of cameor (white flower)
One of these silent mutations is a single base
change, from G to A, in the splice donor site of intron
6
3/7/2016 57MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
58. Role of GT splice donar site
• GT region present in all introns
• Help to removal of intron region in during
mRNA processing
• Mis-spling
3/7/2016 58MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
62. •Flowers from the twelve PI lines, JI 2822 and Came´or
used in this analysis.
• RT-PCR products spanning the exon6-exon7 junction.
•79 bp amplify in color flower campare to white flower
(87bp)
3/7/2016 62MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
64. Uncharacterized genes
• Position of flower (Fa or Fas)
• Pod color (Gp)
• Pod form (P or V)
Why ?
3/7/2016 64MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
65. POSITION OF FLOWERS
• Axil or terminal
• Several genes regulate
the position of flowers-
– det, Fa, Fas
• det locus muntant is
not correlate with mendel
explaination
3/7/2016 65MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
66. • Fa and Fas locus on linkage group IV and III
respectivly
• Relation between Fas and Le
• This fascinated type phenotype also seen in
Arabidopsis.
• Failure CLV signalling path way
3/7/2016 66MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
67. POD COLOR
• Green color (Gp) > Yellow color (gp) (LG-V)
• Is not contrasting of I locus
• In yellow pods plastids are restricted to single
layer and lack of grana (5%)
3/7/2016 67MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
68. • Is it possible to get yellow cotyleden in green
pods?
Gp locus on linkage group on V but I on
linkage group I so mendel 2nd law apply
3/7/2016 68MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
69. POD FORM
• Inflated > constricted Pods
• Sclerenchyma layer plays role
• Suger pods
• p or v mutants possess the same phenotype
– Pv – small patch of sclerenchyma
– pV – sclerenchyma along each side
– pv – lack of sclerenchyma
Which mutant mendel
study ?
3/7/2016 69MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
70. Mendel found the linkage
•Why did mendel use less
no. sample in
independent assortment
of stem length and pod
form
•he used genotype
mutant in V locous
•V and Le are 15 cM apart
on linkage group III
Mendel not found the
linkage
•If he studied P locous
mutant
•P locus on linkage group
VI
•then no Question of
linkage
Linkage ?
3/7/2016 70MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR
71. Trait
Dominant
phenotype
Recessive
phenotype
LG Gene function
Molecular
nature of
mutation
Reference
Seed
shape(R)
Round Wrinkle V
Starch branching
enzyme 1
0.8-kb insertion
Bhattacharyya et
al. (1990)
Stem
length(L)
Tall Dwarf III GA3-oxidase1
G-to-A
substitution
Martin et al.
(1997)
Cotyledon
color(I)
Yellow Green I Staygreen gene 6-bp insertion Sato et al., (2007)
Flower
color(A)
Purple White II
bHLH transcription
factor
G-to-A splice site
Hellens et al.,
(2010)
Pod
color(GP/?)
Green Yellow V
Chloroplast
structure
Unknown
Reid and Ross.,
(2011)
Pod
form(V/?)
Inflated Constricted III
Scleronchyma
formation
Unknown
Reid and Ross.,
(2011)
Flower
position(FA/?
)
Axil Terminal IV Meristem function Unknown
Reid and Ross.,
(2011)3/7/2016 71MAHESH R HAMPANNAVAR