Discussion Discuss an organization’s need for physical security. What methods, approaches, and models can be used by organizations when designing physical security needs? Lastly, explain how these security measures will safeguard the organization. Please make your initial post and two response posts substantive. A substantive post will do at least TWO of the following: · Ask an interesting, thoughtful question pertaining to the topic · Answer a question (in detail) posted by another student or the instructor · Provide extensive additional information on the topic · Explain, define, or analyze the topic in detail · Share an applicable personal experience · Provide an outside source that applies to the topic, along with additional information about the topic or the source (please cite properly in APA) · Make an argument concerning the topic. At least one scholarly source should be used in the initial discussion thread. Be sure to use information from your readings and other sources. Use proper citations and references in your post. 300 words and 2 references. Assignments View Feedback Feedback for 7-2 Career Assessment Report: Draft Two Submission Feedback Rubric Name: COU 630 Assessment Report Draft Two Rubric COU-630-Q3485 Career Counseling 20TW3 SC mySNHU Online Student Services Shapiro LibraryCourse Menu Tools Help Hi Shannen, There is room for improvement on draft 2. Please see Turn it in Markups for areas to improve. Please reach out if you have any questions on the feedback. Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Assessment Scoring: Scored 0 / 8 Assessment Results Interpretation: Results 6.8 / 8 8 points Discusses how the assessments are scored 6.8 points Discusses how the assessments are scored, but lacks detail or has inaccuracies Criterion Feedback See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion 8 points States the results of each assessment 0 points Does not state the results of each assessment Criterion Feedback See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion 0 points Does not address how assessments are scored 6.8 points States the results of each assessment but lacks detail or contains inaccuracies Feedback for 7-2 Career Assessment Report: Draft Two - COU... https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_f... 1 of 5 3/15/20, 9:37 PM Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Assessment Results Interpretation: Assessment Means 6.8 / 8 Assessment Results Interpretation: Mean Together 0 / 8 Assessment Results Interpretation: Future Career 6.8 / 8 Assessment Results Interpretation: Validity and Reliability 0 / 8 8 points Summarizes what each assessment means 0 points Does not summarize what each assessment means Criterion Feedback See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion 8 points Summarizes what the assessments mean together 6.8 points Summarizes what the assessments mean together, but lack ...

1. Discussion
Discuss an organization’s need for physical security. What
methods, approaches, and models can be used by organizations
when designing physical security needs? Lastly, explain how
these security measures will safeguard the organization.
Please make your initial post and two response posts
substantive. A substantive post will do at least TWO of the
following:
· Ask an interesting, thoughtful question pertaining to the topic
· Answer a question (in detail) posted by another student or the
instructor
· Provide extensive additional information on the topic
· Explain, define, or analyze the topic in detail
· Share an applicable personal experience
· Provide an outside source that applies to the topic, along with
additional information about the topic or the source (please cite
properly in APA)
· Make an argument concerning the topic.
At least one scholarly source should be used in the initial
discussion thread. Be sure to use information from your
readings and other sources. Use proper citations and references
in your post.
300 words and 2 references.
Assignments View Feedback
Feedback for 7-2 Career Assessment Report:
Draft Two
Submission Feedback

2. Rubric Name: COU 630 Assessment Report Draft Two Rubric
COU-630-Q3485 Career Counseling 20TW3 SC
mySNHU Online Student Services Shapiro LibraryCourse Menu
Tools Help
Hi Shannen,
There is room for improvement on draft 2. Please see Turn it in
Markups for areas to improve.
Please reach out if you have any questions on the feedback.
Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident
Assessment
Scoring: Scored
0 / 8
Assessment
Results
Interpretation:
Results
6.8 / 8
8 points
Discusses how the
assessments are

3. scored
6.8 points
Discusses how the
assessments are
scored, but lacks
detail or has
inaccuracies
Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion
8 points
States the results of
each assessment
0 points
Does not state the
results of each
assessment
Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion

4. 0 points
Does not address
how assessments are
scored
6.8 points
States the results of
each assessment but
lacks detail or
contains inaccuracies
Feedback for 7-2 Career Assessment Report: Draft Two -
COU...
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_f.
..
1 of 5 3/15/20, 9:37 PM
Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident
Assessment
Results
Interpretation:
Assessment Means

5. 6.8 / 8
Assessment
Results
Interpretation:
Mean Together
0 / 8
Assessment
Results
Interpretation:
Future Career
6.8 / 8
Assessment
Results
Interpretation:
Validity and
Reliability
0 / 8
8 points

6. Summarizes what
each assessment
means
0 points
Does not summarize
what each
assessment means
Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion
8 points
Summarizes what
the assessments
mean together
6.8 points
Summarizes what the
assessments mean
together, but lacks
detail

7. Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion
8 points
Summarizes what
the results mean in
terms of the client’s
future career
0 points
Does not summarize
what the results
mean in terms of the
client's future career
Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion
8 points
Addresses the
validity and reliability
of the results

8. 6.8 points
Addresses the validity
and reliability of the
results, but has
inaccuracies or lacks
detail
Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion
6.8 points
Summarizes what
each assessment
means, but lacks
detail or has
inaccuracies
0 points
Does not summarize
what the
assessments mean

9. together
6.8 points
Summarizes what the
results mean in terms
of the client’s future
career, but lacks
detail in potential
future careers or has
inaccuracies
0 points
Does not address the
validity and reliability
of the results
Feedback for 7-2 Career Assessment Report: Draft Two -
COU...
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_f.
..
2 of 5 3/15/20, 9:37 PM

10. Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident
Recommendations:
Educational Level
6.8 / 8
Recommendations:
Education
Resources
6.8 / 8
Recommendations:
Occupational
Resources
6.8 / 8
Recommendations:
Career Direction
6.8 / 8
8 points
Discusses how the
results impact their
educational level

11. 0 points
Does not discuss
how the results
impact their
educational level
Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion
8 points
Identifies any
specific education
resources
recommended for
the client
0 points
Does not identify any
specific education
resources
recommended for the

12. client
Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion
8 points
Identifies any
occupational
resources you may
provide the client
with
0 points
Does not identify any
occupational
resources you may
provide the client
with
Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion
8 points

13. Discusses what the
client’s suggested
career direction
should be moving
forward
0 points
Does not discuss
what you suggest the
client's career
direction should be
moving forward
6.8 points
Discusses how the
results impact their
educational level, but
lacks detail or
contains inaccuracies
6.8 points

14. Identifies any specific
education resources
recommended for the
client, but submission
is inappropriate or
does not cover all
required elements
6.8 points
Identifies any specific
occupational
resources
recommended for the
client, but submission
is inappropriate or
does not cover all
required elements
6.8 points
Discusses what the

15. client’s suggested
career direction
should be moving
forward, but lacks
sufficient
Feedback for 7-2 Career Assessment Report: Draft Two -
COU...
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_f.
..
3 of 5 3/15/20, 9:37 PM
Total 66.4 / 100
Overall Score
Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident
Recommendations:
Data
6.8 / 8
Conclusion: Career
Recommendations
8 / 8
Articulation of

16. Response
4 / 4
Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion
8 points
Supports the client’s
career direction
using data
0 points
Does not support the
client’s career
direction using data
Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion
6.8 points
Summarizes overall
career
recommendations but

17. has inconsistencies or
lacks detail
0 points
Does not summarize
overall career
recommendations
Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion
3.4 points
Submission has major
errors related to
citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or
organization that
negatively impact
readability and
articulation of main
ideas

18. 0 points
Submission has
critical errors related
to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or
organization that
prevent
understanding of
ideas
Criterion Feedback
See Turn it in markup for details on this criterion
recommendations, or
recommendations do
not align to the
assessment results
6.8 points
Supports the client’s
career direction using

19. data, but lacks clarity
8 points
Summarizes overall
career
recommendations
4 points
Submission has no
major errors related
to citations,
grammar, spelling,
syntax, or
organization
Feedback for 7-2 Career Assessment Report: Draft Two -
COU...
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_f.
..
4 of 5 3/15/20, 9:37 PM
Score
46.48 / 70 - F

20. Feedback Date
Mar 15, 2020 2:08 PM
Assignment
7-2 Career Assessment Report: Draft Two
Points earned out of 100
86 points minimum
The overall submission earned 86
points or more. Final calculation of
grades can be found in the
gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
1 point minimum
The overall submission earned 1
points or more. Final calculation of
grades can be found in the
gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
0 points minimum
The overall submission earned 0

21. points or more. Final calculation of
grades can be found in the
gradebook.
Submission ID Submission(s) Turnitin® Similarity Inline
Feedback Date Submitted
10454617 week 7 .doc (32 KB) 8 %
View
Turnitin®
GradeMark®
Mar 8, 2020 12:55 PM
Done
Feedback for 7-2 Career Assessment Report: Draft Two -
COU...
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_user_view_f.
..
5 of 5 3/15/20, 9:37 PM
week 7 .doc
by Shannen Carambia
Submission date: 08-Mar-2020 12:55PM (UTC-0400)
Submission ID: 1271504935

22. File name: week_7_.doc (32K)
Word count: 983
Character count: 5337
→
Address task
Vague
Address task
Strong evidence
Address task
Vague
VagueCheck evidence
Strong evidence
Explain your evidence
Strong evidence

23. Check evidence
Critical Element
8%
SIMILARITY INDEX
5%
INTERNET SOURCES
5%
PUBLICATIONS
7%
STUDENT PAPERS
1 3%
2 2%
3 1%
4 1%
5 1%
Exclude quotes On
Exclude bibliography Off
Exclude matches Off
week 7 .doc
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES

24. Submitted to York St John University
Student Paper
Submitted to Argosy University
Student Paper
www.drryanduffy.com
Internet Source
Submitted to Roehampton University
Student Paper
Submitted to American Public University System
Student Paper
QM
QM
QM
QM
FINAL GRADE
/70
week 7 .doc
GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor

25. PAGE 1
PAGE 2
→
Move right
Additional Comment
Level 1 heading is centered; applies to all subsequent Level 1
headings- see project outline
Address task
Present a topic sentence that clearly addresses the task. Look
back at the question and revise your
response so that your ideas on the topic are clear.
Additional Comment
Refer to the rubric on this criterion. Here you should discuss
what you learned from the scoring
information for each assessments.
Vague
Unclear:
When making a point in one of your body paragraphs, one of the
most common mistakes is to not
offer enough details. A paragraph without much detail will seem
vague and sketchy. A paper is
always strengthened when your claims are as specific as
possible, The more detailed evidence you
offer, the more reference points your reader will have.
Remember that you are communicating your
argument to a reader who has only your description to go by.
Someone who reads your essay will
not automatically know what you mean to express, so you have
to supply details, to show the reader

26. what you mean, not just tell him or her.
Additional Comment
For example, stating what assessment was used and what
interests were assessed would explain
what you are discussing.
Address task
Present a topic sentence that clearly addresses the task. Look
back at the question and revise your
response so that your ideas on the topic are clear.
Additional Comment
It appears that only one assessment was addressed. The results
of both a personality assessment
and career assessment was needed for draft 2
QM
QM
QM
QM
QM
Strong evidence
The evidence selected is highly relevant to your topic sentence.
In future responses, continue to
include the most appropriate evidence to support your ideas.
PAGE 3

27. Address task
Present a topic sentence that clearly addresses the task. Look
back at the question and revise your
response so that your ideas on the topic are clear.
Additional Comment
only one assessment was interpreted
Vague
Unclear:
When making a point in one of your body paragraphs, one of the
most common mistakes is to not
offer enough details. A paragraph without much detail will seem
vague and sketchy. A paper is
always strengthened when your claims are as specific as
possible, The more detailed evidence you
offer, the more reference points your reader will have.
Remember that you are communicating your
argument to a reader who has only your description to go by.
Someone who reads your essay will
not automatically know what you mean to express, so you have
to supply details, to show the reader
what you mean, not just tell him or her.
Additional Comment
It was expected that the assessment offered specific career
options
Vague
Unclear:
When making a point in one of your body paragraphs, one of the
most common mistakes is to not
offer enough details. A paragraph without much detail will seem
vague and sketchy. A paper is
always strengthened when your claims are as specific as
possible, The more detailed evidence you

28. offer, the more reference points your reader will have.
Remember that you are communicating your
argument to a reader who has only your description to go by.
Someone who reads your essay will
not automatically know what you mean to express, so you have
to supply details, to show the reader
what you mean, not just tell him or her.
Additional Comment
Validity and reliability were not adequately addressed
Check evidence
Check your evidence here. Be sure to represent all information
appropriately.
Additional Comment
a cited source will substantiate the discussion here
Also remember the goal is to assess how well these assessments
can predict career options for your
client
PAGE 4
QM
QM
QM
QM
QM

29. Strong evidence
The evidence selected is highly relevant to your topic sentence.
In future responses, continue to
include the most appropriate evidence to support your ideas.
Explain your evidence
Explain to the reader how the evidence supports your ideas
about the topic. Your response should
show that you understand the topic and/or source(s).
Additional Comment
How should your client practice? Where is the practice?:
Strong evidence
The evidence selected is highly relevant to your topic sentence.
In future responses, continue to
include the most appropriate evidence to support your ideas.
PAGE 5
Check evidence
Check your evidence here. Be sure to represent all information
appropriately.
Additional Comment
a cited source will substantiate the discussion here
Critical Element
Missing Critical Element
Additional Comment
Your report did not reflect information obtained from both a
personality assessment and career
assessment.

30. PAGE 6
week 7 .docby Shannen Carambiaweek 7 .docORIGINALITY
REPORTPRIMARY SOURCESweek 7 .docGRADEMARK
REPORTFINAL GRADEGENERAL COMMENTSInstructor
!"# $%& '(()((*)+, -)./0, 1023, 45/ 6789):8+)( 2+9 -7;08<
!" #$%& '(&)* +&,'* $' *-. /)).))0."* 1.2$&*3 #$% ,++&.)) *-.
("*&$+%4*($"3 ,)).))0."* &.5(.63 ,"+ ,)).))0."* ,+0("()*&,*($"7
8$% 6(99 "$6 :%(9+ $" *-,* +&,'*
6(*- #$%& ,)).))0."* )4$&(";3 ,)).))0."* &.)%9*)
("*.&2&.*,*($"3 &.4$00."+,*($")3 ,"+ 4$"49%)($"7 8$% ,&.
%)("; *-. ),0. &.)%9*) #$% &.4.(5.+ '&$0 #$%&
2,&*".& '$& #$%& '(&)* +&,'* ,) #$% 4$029.*. *-() ).4$"+
+&,'*7
/) 2,&* $' #$%& /)).))0."* 1.)%9*) !"*.&2&.*,*($"3 #$% 6(99
,;,(" .<29$&. 5,9(+(*# ,"+ &.9(,:(9(*#7 =-." 4$")(+.&(";
5,9(+(*# ,"+ &.9(,:(9(*# $' *-. (")*&%0."*)3
*$;.*-.&3 $'*." 6-,* #$% ,&. 9$$>("; '$& () -$6 6.99 *-.
(")*&%0."*) 2&.+(4* )%(*,:(9(*# '$& , 4,&..&7 ?#2(4,99# *-.
&.)%9*) 6(99 0,*4- %2 *-. ("+(5(+%,!"# $%&'('"&"
,"+ 2.&)$",9(*# 6(*- , 2$*."*(,9 4,&..& 2,*-7
1.'.& *$ *-. @AB CDE F(",9 G&$H.4* ! A%*9(". I9$4,*.+ (" *-
. /))(;"0."* J%(+.9(". ,"+ 1%:&(4 ).4*($" 6(*-(" K*,&* L.&.M
*$ -.92 )*&%4*%&. #$%& 2&$H.4*7
=0/*.,> F$& *-() ,))(;"0."*3 #$% 6(99 )%:0(* *-. ,)).))0."*
)4$&(";3 ,)).))0."* &.)%9*) ("*.&2&.*,*($"3 &.4$00."+,*($")3
,"+ 4$"49%)($" ).4*($") $' #$%&
4,&..& ,)).))0."* &.2$&* '$& (")*&%4*$& '..+:,4>7

31. K2.4('(4,99#3 *-. '$99$6("; <08,8<2: ):)*)+,( 0%)* :.
,++&.)).+N
!O7 '(()((*)+, ?</[email protected]
/7 P()4%)) -$6 *-. ,)).))0."*) ,&. (</0)97
O7 '(()((*)+, -)(7:,( A+,)0.0),2,8/+
/7 K*,*. *-. 0)(7:,( $' .,4- ,)).))0."*7
Q7 K%00,&(R. 6-,* .,4- 2(()((*)+, *)2+(7 P()4%)) *-.
2.&)$",9(*# ,"+ 4,&..& ,)).))0."*) (" ).2,&,*. 2,&,;&,2-)7
@7 K%00,&(R. 6-,* *-. ,)).))0."*) *)2+ ,/@),B)07
i. =-,* () #$%& ("*.&2&.*,*($" $' *-. ,)).))0."* &.)%9*)S
IT$*.N 8$%& ("*.&2&.*,*($" )-$%9+ :. +()4%)).+ ,) , ).2,&,*.
-.,+("; %"+.& #$%&
)%00,&# $' 6-,* *-. ,)).))0."*) 0.," *$;.*-.&7M
P7 K%00,&(R. 6-,* *-. &.)%9*) 0.," (" *.&0) $' *-. 49(."*#)
37,70) <20))07
i. U,>. )%&. *$ 2&$5(+. &,*($",9.') *+,( (-&$+%-!' ".+,!/
$%0!,/' .+1 &.' 2'-%$%3 +4 &.' ('",!&" -!$3% 1$&. &.'
0!$'%&#" 4,&,(' 0-(''()
V7 /++&.)) *-. C2:898,D 2+9 0):82;8:8,D $' *-. &.)%9*)7
i. T$*.N 8$% +()4%)).+ 4$"4.&") ,&$%"+ 5,9(+(*# ,"+
&.9(,:(9(*# $' *-. *$$9) (" *-. ,)).))0."* &.5(.6 $' #$%& '(&)*
+&,'*7 T$63 +()4%)) *-.
5-!$/$&6 -%/ ('!$-7$!$&6 +4 &.' &++!"# -7$!$&6 &+ 8('/$0&
4,&,(' 0-(''( +8&$+%" 7-"'/ +% &.' -""'""2'%& ('",!&" -%/ ('"'-
(0. $" *-. *$$97
O!7 -)</**)+92,8/+(
/7 P()4%)) -$6 *-. &.)%9*) (02,4* *-.(& )97<2,8/+2: :)C):7
(7 P$.) *-. 49(."* "..+ 0$&. .+%4,*($" *$ )..> , ".6 4,&..&S

32. ((7 =-,* +$ *-. &.)%9*) (029(4,*. 6(*- &.)2.4* *$ *-.(&
.+%4,*($"S
Q7 !+."*('# ,"# )2.4('(4 )97<2,8/+ 0)(/70<)( #$% 6$%9+
&.4$00."+7 =-#S
@7 !+."*('# ,"# /<<7.2,8/+2: 0)(/70<)( #$% 0,# 2&$5(+. *-.
49(."* 6(*-7
(7 =-,* $44%2,*($",9 &.)$%&4.) 6$%9+ #$% &.4$00."+ *$ -
.92S =-#S
P7 P()4%)) 6-,* #$% )%;;.)* *-. 49(."*W) <20))0 980)<,8/+ )-
$%9+ :. 0$5("; '$&6,&+7
V7 K%22$&* *-. 49(."*W) &.4$00."+.+ 4,&..& +(&.4*($"
%)("; 92,27
(7 L$6 () *-. +,*, ("'$&0("; *-. 9,:$& 0,&>.* ,"+ *-. 4,&..& 2,*-
#$% ,&. )%;;.)*(";S
O!!7 !/+<:7(8/+
/7 K%00,&(R. #$%& $5.&,99 <20))0 0)</**)+92,8/+(E
(7 =-,* ,&. #$%& $5.&,99 &.4$00."+,*($") ,"+ 2&.+(4*($") ,"+
2&$;"$)()S
-7;08<
6789):8+)( 3/0 ?7;*8((8/+> 8$%& 4,&..& ,)).))0."* &.2$&* )-
$%9+ :. , 0("(0%0 $' D 2,;.) (" 9.";*- ,"+ '$&0,**.+ ,) , 49("(4,9
+$4%0."* *-,* %).) *-. ).4*($")
(" *-. 2&$02* ,) *-. )*&%4*%&. ,"+ '$&0,*7 B). /G/
'$&0,**(";N +$%:9. )2,4(";3 XYZ2$("* ?(0.) T.6 1$0," '$"*3
,"+ $".Z("4- 0,&;(")7 V,4- -.,+("; )-$%9+ :.
)%22$&*.+ 6(*- 4%&&."* 9(*.&,*%&. ,"+ *-. &.)$%&4.)
("49%+.+ (" *-() 4$%&).7 U,>. )%&. *$ ("49%+. ,99

33. +$4%0."*.+ 4-,";.) '&$0 #$%& +&,'*) %)("; *&,4> 4-,";.)7
!' #$% +$ "$* %). *&,4> 4-,";.)3 #$%& (")*&%4*$& 6(99 ,)>
#$% *$ &.)%:0(* #$%& 2,2.&7
!08,8<2: F:)*)+,( =0/38<8)+, GH&&IJ K))9( A*.0/C)*)+,
GLMIJ K/, FC89)+, G&IJ N2:7)
'(()((*)+, ?</[email protected]>
?</0)9
P()4%)).) -$6 *-. ,)).))0."*) ,&. )4$&.+ P()4%)).) -$6 *-.
,)).))0."*) ,&. )4$&.+3
:%* 9,4>) +.*,(9 $& -,) (",44%&,4(.)
P$.) "$* ,++&.)) -$6 ,)).))0."*) ,&.
)4$&.+
[
'(()((*)+, -)(7:,(
A+,)0.0),2,8/+> -)(7:,(
K*,*.) *-. &.)%9*) $' .,4- ,)).))0."* K*,*.) *-. &.)%9*) $' .,4-
,)).))0."* :%*
9,4>) +.*,(9 $& 4$"*,(") (",44%&,4(.)
P$.) "$* )*,*. *-. &.)%9*) $' .,4-
,)).))0."*
[
'(()((*)+, -)(7:,(
A+,)0.0),2,8/+>
'(()((*)+, O)2+(
K%00,&(R.) 6-,* .,4- ,)).))0."* 0.,") K%00,&(R.) 6-,* .,4-

34. ,)).))0."* 0.,")3
:%* 9,4>) +.*,(9 $& -,) (",44%&,4(.)
P$.) "$* )%00,&(R. 6-,* .,4- ,)).))0."*
0.,")
[
'(()((*)+, -)(7:,(
A+,)0.0),2,8/+> O)2+
4/@),B)0
K%00,&(R.) 6-,* *-. ,)).))0."*) 0.,"
*$;.*-.&
K%00,&(R.) 6-,* *-. ,)).))0."*) 0.,"
*$;.*-.&3 :%* 9,4>) +.*,(9
P$.) "$* )%00,&(R. 6-,* *-. ,)).))0."*)
0.," *$;.*-.&
[
'(()((*)+, -)(7:,(
A+,)0.0),2,8/+> P7,70)
!20))0
K%00,&(R.) 6-,* *-. &.)%9*) 0.," (" *.&0)
+4 &.' 0!$'%&#" 4,&,(' 0-(''(
K%00,&(R.) 6-,* *-. &.)%9*) 0.," (" *.&0)
+4 &.' 0!$'%&#" 4,&,(' 0-(''(9 7,& !-0:" /'&-$!
(" 2$*."*(,9 '%*%&. 4,&..&) $& -,)
(",44%&,4(.)

35. P$.) "$* )%00,&(R. 6-,* *-. &.)%9*) 0.,"
(" *.&0) $' *-. 49(."*W) '%*%&. 4,&..&
[
'(()((*)+, -)(7:,(
A+,)0.0),2,8/+> N2:898,D
2+9 -):82;8:8,D
/++&.)).) *-. 5,9(+(*# ,"+ &.9(,:(9(*# $' *-.
&.)%9*)
/++&.)).) *-. 5,9(+(*# ,"+ &.9(,:(9(*# $' *-.
&.)%9*)3 :%* -,) (",44%&,4(.) $& 9,4>) +.*,(9
P$.) "$* ,++&.)) *-. 5,9(+(*# ,"+ &.9(,:(9(*#
$' *-. &.)%9*)
[
-)</**)+92,8/+(>
F97<2,8/+2: Q)C):
P()4%)).) -$6 *-. &.)%9*) (02,4* *-.(&
.+%4,*($",9 9.5.9
P()4%)).) -$6 *-. &.)%9*) (02,4* *-.(&
.+%4,*($",9 9.5.93 :%* 9,4>) +.*,(9 $&
4$"*,(") (",44%&,4(.)
P$.) "$* +()4%)) -$6 *-. &.)%9*) (02,4*
*-.(& .+%4,*($",9 9.5.9
[

36. -)</**)+92,8/+(>
F97<2,8/+ -)(/70<)(
!+."*('(.) ,"# )2.4('(4 .+%4,*($" &.)$%&4.)
&.4$00."+.+ '$& *-. 49(."*
!+."*('(.) ,"# )2.4('(4 .+%4,*($" &.)$%&4.)
&.4$00."+.+ '$& *-. 49(."*3 :%* )%:0())($"
() (",22&$2&(,*. $& +$.) "$* 4$5.& ,99
&.%(&.+ .9.0."*)
P$.) "$* (+."*('# ,"# )2.4('(4 .+%4,*($"
&.)$%&4.) &.4$00."+.+ '$& *-. 49(."*
[
-)</**)+92,8/+(>
"<<7.2,8/+2:
-)(/70<)(
!+."*('(.) ,"# $44%2,*($",9 &.)$%&4.) #$%
0,# 2&$5(+. *-. 49(."* 6(*-
!+."*('(.) ,"# )2.4('(4 $44%2,*($",9
&.)$%&4.) &.4$00."+.+ '$& *-. 49(."*3 :%*
)%:0())($" () (",22&$2&(,*. $& +$.) "$*
4$5.& ,99 &.%(&.+ .9.0."*)
P$.) "$* (+."*('# ,"# $44%2,*($",9
&.)$%&4.) #$% 0,# 2&$5(+. *-. 49(."* 6(*-
[
-)</**)+92,8/+(>
!20))0 180)<,8/+

37. ;$"0,""'" 1.-& &.' 0!$'%&#" ",33'"&'/ 0-(''(
+(&.4*($" )-$%9+ :. 0$5("; '$&6,&+
;$"0,""'" 1.-& &.' 0!$'%&#" ",33'"&'/ 0-(''(
+(&.4*($" )-$%9+ :. 0$5("; '$&6,&+3 :%*
9,4>) )%''(4(."* &.4$00."+,*($")3 $&
P$.) "$* +()4%)) 6-,* #$% )%;;.)* *-.
49(."*W) 4,&..& +(&.4*($" )-$%9+ :. 0$5(";
'$&6,&+
[
&.4$00."+,*($") +$ "$* ,9(;" *$ *-.
,)).))0."* &.)%9*)
-)</**)+92,8/+(>
12,2
<,88+(&" &.' 0!$'%&#" 0-(''( /$('0&$+% ,"$%3
+,*,
<,88+(&" &.' 0!$'%&#" 0-(''( /$('0&$+% ,"$%3
+,*,3 :%* 9,4>) 49,&(*#
;+'" %+& ",88+(& &.' 0!$'%&#" 0-(''(
+(&.4*($" %)("; +,*,
[
!/+<:7(8/+> !20))0
-)</**)+92,8/+(

38. K%00,&(R.) $5.&,99 4,&..&
&.4$00."+,*($")
K%00,&(R.) $5.&,99 4,&..&
&.4$00."+,*($") :%* -,) ("4$")()*."4(.) $&
9,4>) +.*,(9
P$.) "$* )%00,&(R. $5.&,99 4,&..&
&.4$00."+,*($")
[
'0,8<7:2,8/+ /3
-)(./+()
K%:0())($" -,) "$ 0,H$& .&&$&) &.9,*.+ *$
4(*,*($")3 ;&,00,&3 )2.99(";3 )#"*,<3 $&
$&;,"(R,*($"
K%:0())($" -,) 0,H$& .&&$&) &.9,*.+ *$
4(*,*($")3 ;&,00,&3 )2.99(";3 )#"*,<3 $&
$&;,"(R,*($" *-,* ".;,*(5.9# (02,4*
&.,+,:(9(*# ,"+ ,&*(4%9,*($" $' 0,(" (+.,)
K%:0())($" -,) 4&(*(4,9 .&&$&) &.9,*.+ *$
4(*,*($")3 ;&,00,&3 )2.99(";3 )#"*,<3 $&
$&;,"(R,*($" *-,* 2&.5."* %"+.&)*,"+("; $'
(+.,)
]
4/,2: H&&I