Procedures for Performing Systematic Review. This is general guideline for undertaking systematic reviews.The goal of this document is helpful for preparing systematic paper.
6. .
Planning Conducting Reporting
The stages associated with planning the review are:
• need
• Development
•
• Selection
• assessment
• extraction monitoring
• synthesis
The stages associated with conducting the review are:
7. .
need for a systematic review
CRC [12] suggests the following checklist:
• objectives
• restrictions
• inclusion/exclusion criteria
• assess the quality
• extracted
• synthesised
combined
• conclusions flow evidence
8. .
need for a systematic review
From a more general viewpoint, Greenlaugh [9] suggests the following questions:
•
•
•
•
•
9. .
reduce the possibility researcher bias
most important activity research question.
The Research Question
In software engineering, questions can be adapted to software engineering issues as follows:
< Question Types >
• effect
•
• Identifying cost and risk factors
•
•
18. 5. Conducting the review
• 5.1 Identification of Research
– 5.1.1 Generating a search strategy
Baron-Cohen S, Jolliffe T, Mortimore C,
Robertson M. Another advanced test
of theory of mind: evidence from very
high functioning adults with autism or
asperger syndrome. Journal of Child
Psychology and Psychiatry
1997;38:813–22.
Baron-Cohen S, Ring HA, Wheelwright
S, Bullmore ET, Brammer MJ, Simmons
A, et al. Social intelligence in the
normal and autistic brain: an fMRI
study. European Journal of
Neuroscience 1999;11:1891–8.
• 관련 논문의 Reference를 참조하여 중요 논문들을 찾음
19. 5. Conducting the review
• 5.1 Identification of Research
– 5.1.1 Generating a search strategy
• Journals (including company journals such as the IBM Journal of Research and
Development), grey literature (i.e. technical reports, work in progress) and conference
proceedings.
• Grey literature : 정식 시판되는 거시 아닌 기관에서 만든 보고서, 학술적인 기술보고서 등
Neuropsychologia
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
European Journal of Neuroscience
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
• Internet
20. 5. Conducting the review
• 5.1 Identification of Research
– 5.1.3 Documenting the Search
– Wikipedia
List of academic databases and search
engines
21. .
Study selection criteria
•
• research question
•
Japanese or Chinese
papers are often difficult to access
• authors,
institutions, journals or year of publication
•
26. .
Using the Quality Instrument
Quality appraisal
synthesis of results
Limitations of Quality Assessment
• possible assume something wasn’t reported,