Essay On Israel

Essay On Israel
On the first night of the talks, September 5th 1978, Carter met with Begin to discuss the Israeli
proposal for peace. Begin asserted that Israel's highest priority was guaranteeing security to its
people, which included keeping Israeli settlements in the Sinai territories. Additionally, Begin
wanted to retain Israeli airfields in the Sinai for between 3–5 years, after which Israel would agree
to a general demilitarization of the region. Carter found Begin's proposal to be inflexible and
discouraging. The next day Carter met with Sadat, who presented him with a detailed proposal of
Egypt's framework for peace. The proposal obliged a full Israeli withdrawal from all occupied
territories, removal of all Israeli settlements in occupied ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Begin also reproached Carter for taking sides with the Egyptians. No formal meetings were held on
September 9th, however the Americans fleshed out their own proposal for peace. The following day,
the Americans presented their proposal to the Israeli delegation, which roused heated discussions
between the U.S. and Israel. This framework outlined that Israel was to restore Egyptian sovereignty
to the Sinai in exchange for Egypt's establishment of a full peace and normal relations with Israel.
The framework additionally proposed a five–year translational arrangement for the West Bank and
Gaza, resulting in the abolishment of Israeli military administration and establishment of a self–
governing authority in the West Bank and Gaza. The Israelis recommended multiple changes to this
framework, and on Sept. 11th Carter presented the Israeli–revised American proposal to Sadat.
Sadat responded that he might be willing to allow Israel to retain two of its airfields for three years
and Israeli settlers to remain in the Sinai for the same period of time. On September 12th, President
Carter presented his "Framework for a Settlement in Sinai" to Sadat and Begin, which comprised
Carter's own views on a potential solution. Sadat largely accepted this proposal, yet Begin found
fault with Carter's language surrounding Resolution 242 and even suggested Israel's willingness to
end the negotiations unsuccessfully. The next day, some progress was made as both sides agreed that
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

A Brief Story of Yitzhak Rabin
1. Introduction On the evening of November 4, 1995, it was the time to celebrate the joyfully
weekend. But for the peace–loving people, particularly for the peace–loving people in Israel and
Arab, it was actually a black weekend. It was precisely that evening, one of the creators of
Palestinian–Israeli peace, who was known as peaceful warrior, Yitzhak Rabin, Premier of Israeli,
was murdered by an assassin. The world had shocked, his imposing and heartrending life, became
the focal point of the people immediately. All the peace–lovers were sorrowful for his death. They
burst into tears for him, prayed for him, wished his soul to be serene in heaven. A peace dove had
been gunned down; a peace warrior was falling down with several barbaric, ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
In July 1976, Israeli hostages on a plane hijacked. But they were rescued from Uganda by the I.D.F.
This was a great success in the war with terrorists. It demonstrated that Israel refused to capitulate to
terrorism. In April 1977, Yitzhak Rabin resigned as prime minister in the wake of the revelation that
his wife, Leah, retained a bank account in the U.S. from the time her husband had served as
ambassador there. (At the time, operating a foreign currency account was illegal under Israeli
currency law.) (Yang Mansu, 2007) 2.8 As Minister of Defense In 1984, the national government of
Israel agreed to elect Rabin as minister of defense, until the failure of the second unity government
in 1990. One of his tasks was disengaging the I.D.F. from a war of attrition in Lebanon. The two
sides of the war established a narrow zone of security in southern Lebanon. He also canceled the
Lavi aircraft project which developed by Israel Aircraft Industries. Also, he cut off part of the
defense budget as part of efforts to help the economy and halt inflation. In December 1987, the
outburst of the Intifada (the Palestinian uprising in the occupied territories) caught Israel by
surprise. Rapidly, Israel escalated to alarming proportions. Rabin initially adopted an iron–fist
policy to suppress the uprising and instructed the I.D.F. to respond to

Culture Essay : Israel 's ' Zionists Of America Convention...
Culture Essay: Israel
Introduction: "Israel was not created in order to disappear– Israel will endure and flourish. It is the
child of hope and the home of the brave. It can neither be broken by adversity nor demoralized by
success. It carries the shield of democracy and it honors the sword of freedom."This quote from
President John F. Kennedy 's Zionists of America Convention speech can considerably show that
despite the small size of the country, its culture spreads out from many different foundations that
would allow Israel itself to thrive. Israel has such a great history behind it. There has been a great
deal of events that have occurred in this country. A lot of the history is still standing today and is
still in fact being talked about. However violence and disagreements have contribute a serious role
in Israel's short history. In just the six one years Israel has been declared a state they have fought in
six wars, two civil wars, and over hundreds of disputes over the state. Yet, Israel still stands proofing
that it 's people have survived against all odds, and will continue to survive. Since their culture is
massive, and we all have many things to be learn from it. The culture of Israel , which includes
religion, holidays, food, and influential people, is essential to their flourish throughout the world.
Religion: Religion in Israel is an essential part of the country and plays a major role in shaping
Israeli culture and lifestyle. Israel is also the only

Definition Essay: What Is Everyone's Definition Of Freedom?
Imagine the wind blowing through your hair and the sun glistening on your face. You have no
worries and all you can focus on is what is right in front of you. There is nothing that could breach
the happiness that is flowing through your body. This is where you feel the utmost freedom. The
soccer field is where I feel free. Straight from the dictionary, freedom is "the power to act, speak, or
think as one wants without hindrance and restraint." (Merriam–Webster 1), but each person has their
own personal definition of freedom. Freedom is different for all people; comparatively, it is soccer
for me. People fight for freedom every day. Some people are born into that way of life, but some
people work for it and earn it. That is why everyone's definition of freedom is different. What might
be freedom to someone who has had it all their life would be different to someone who has never
experienced it before. For example, one person's freedom may be getting to hang out with their
friends without a curfew. But, to someone else, it could be having the ability to choose who they
want to marry and when, seeing that they do not automatically have that freedom. Freedom is a
personal idea being that everyone experiences it in a different way. It's just like the saying of Yotam
Ottolenghi, "one man's trash is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Every person has their own way to define freedom as everyone has had different experiences in life
that have shaped their definition. Whether working for it or being grateful is daily life for someone,
freedom is always a gift and a goal that people work to achieve. The place that I feel the most free is
the soccer field. Obligations and worries are shoved to the side when there is a ball at my feet;
consequently, it is where I feel the most happy. In conclusion, freedom is the place you feel the most
content and carefree. It is tough for one to live without freedom. Therefore, it is almost impossible
to live without soccer for

Six Days by Jeremy Bowen Essay
In this ambitious work, Jeremy Bowen details the happenings between Israel and Palestine. This
Middle East war sparked much debate throughout the world especially amongst historians. Bowen
uses this work as a personal recount of the six days that shaped the world as it is today. Bowen, an
experienced BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) journalist and editor, presented the world with
the Radio 4 series which allowed listeners to learn of the Six Day war. Through a detailed
assessment of Bowens words readers of the book are able to submerse themselves back to 1967 and
view how monumental moments such as West Bank settlements, the rise of Yasser Arafat, Black
September and the 1973 Yom Kippur war all have roots stemming from the Six–Day ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Egypt than began to mobilize its forces in and around the Suez Canal, moving its forces eastward
across the Sinai desert towards the Israeli border, challenging the extraction of UN Emergency
Force (UNEF) stationed along the boundary. The Egyptians ousted the UN Emergency Force
(UNEF) from the Gaza Strip and Sinai, and continued pouring its military forces into these areas.
Thus, Egypt closed the Straits of Tiran to Israeli shipping, constituting a case for war for Israel.
Responding the Egyptian call, the governments of Jordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Syria and Lebanon
encouraged their militaries towards the Israeli border. Israel mobilized its reserve forces, and
launched a diplomatic campaign to win international support for ending the Egyptian blockade of
Israeli shipping through the Strait of Tiran.
Bowen then begins to chronicle parts of the war as it develops from hour to hour. One of the
benefits of reading this book besides the content is that Bowen is explore policies, planning, and
combats in equal measure. He devotes special attention, for example, to the accurate accounts from
the Israeli side, the idea that diplomacy was merely an option and the fact the prime minister at the
time, Levi Eshkol was very reluctant to go to war.
In the midst of the thorough detail, however, Bowen still manages to highlight the essential details
of the war. He also shows that Palestinians were a witness to the cultivation of their own history.
Bowen also

To What Extent Was the Middle East Conflict between 1948...
Discursive essay
Topic: To what extent was the Middle East conflict between 1948 to 1978 fuelled by the interests
and concerns of the superpowers in the region?
From 1948 to 1978, in the Middle East, the two superpowers at the time the USA and the USSR
were trying to exert their spheres of influence in the Middle East. Each superpower supported
different sides to the conflict with the USA and the West supporting Israel and any other Arab
country that saw the spread of communism as a threat and the USSR supporting the Arab states that
wanted to destroy the Jewish state. The USA interests in the region were for the oil fields and the
Suez Canal trading root while the USSR saw it as strategic value for the oil supplies to the west and
the important trade roots. Both of the superpowers were supplying their allies in the region with
financial and military aid. The four major wars that were fought during this time 1948 the war of
liberation, the Suez crisis, the six day war and the Yom Kippur war had been influenced by the
superpowers using the Middle Eastern countries as their pawns as one tried to undermined the
others influence in the region. How each of the Superpowers used covert warfare in order to secure
their interests in the Middle East.
The war of liberation in 1948–1949 was caused by the two superpowers getting involved in the
formation of the Jewish Israeli state. In 1947 the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern
Ireland, suffering from economic downfall

Terrorism And Its Effects On The World
As sweat drips off of your body you round the corner of the street. You take a moment to admire
that it's a beautiful day in Boston and there's nothing you'd rather be doing then running the
marathon. As you pump your arms and continue to run euphoria takes over as the "runner 's high"
spreads throughout your body. Suddenly you're thrown to the ground by as an explosion goes off to
your left. Ears ringing, you stumble up and look around. There are people all over, bleeding, crying,
and dead. The only feeling you have now is horror. Terrorist groups all over the world are
destroying communities and families by recruiting their young children and killing innocent people.
Terrorism is sweeping the world and it's growing steadily. With a constant inflow of young soldiers,
terrorist groups are stronger than before. They have surely mastered the art of recruiting the weak
and vulnerable and using their weaknesses to carry out dangerous and deadly missions. There are
hundreds of extremist groups carrying out terrorist acts all over the world. Throughout history
terrorism has been a consistent issue in the Middle East. There are however a few that have had
detrimental impacts on countries throughout the Middle East. There are five major terrorist groups
that have had major impacts on local communities and religions that will be discussed. They are all
diverse and based around different religions. Each group is very different but seems to have the
same goal in mind.
CSA

Militancy In The Pre-Independence
Adam Pollack
4–25–17
English 110
Bruce Allen Heggen
Israeli Militancy in the Pre–Independence
The origins of the present day Israeli Defence forces and israeli politics run very far back in the
history of the jewish homeland, even predating the state of israel itself. In the beginning the defence
forces were very unorganized and had goals solely of protection. Through time the jewish militias
developed into different tranches with different purposes and goals. Many times these militias
actually found conflict with each other. There were many changes in the region from the late 19th
century into the mid 20th century. Two world wars, the largest genocide in human history the 1880–
1948 held massive significance to the jewish people and eventually ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Zionists became less and less cooperative with the british as the underground militias gained power
through the years. In 1940 a new organization arose as a branch of the Irgun. The Lehi which means
Fighters for Freedom in Israel is a group that sought to fight the british during World War II. Along
with fighting against the british they sought to ally themselves with the German Nazis. The Nazi's
were intrested in getting rid of their jewish population and so the Lehi offered to have them
evacuated to Israel in exchange for alliance in fighting the British. In the weeks before the
Independence war The Irgun and Lehi groups entered neIghborhood Deir Yassin and killed 254 arab
residents. This event would be knows as the Deir Yassin Massacre. The founder of the Lehi as
Avraham Stern a long time friend of Abraham Thomas. A notable commander of Lehi was Yitzhak
Shamir, He had a long history of defying british rule. Arrested many times for undercover work by
the british, and a member of Lehi he was a villain to the british and exiled to Africa. After
independence He joined the Mossad, an intelligence agency in the Israeli Defence Forces. He served
as prime minister of Israel in 1986–

Assess the Short Term Significance of the Suez War of 1956
Assess the short term significance of the Suez War of 1956
The Suez War had profound short term significance in many aspects. It can be argued to be one of
the first wars in the Arab–Israeli conflict which involved substantial foreign involvement. Although
Britain and France were humiliated and lost their influence in the Middle East, it highlighted the
rising importance of Cold War politics in the Middle East. Egypt and Israel can be considered as
winners of the Suez War; Egypt gained complete control of the Suez Canal and Israel had access to
the Straits of Tiran. However, both countries were to remain hostile and the legacy of the Suez War
will be conflict, not peace.
First of all, the Suez War in 1956 played a significant role in ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
As well as the Three 'Operational Objectives' from the Sinai Campaign, it consisted of three political
aims; to overthrow Nasser, expand Israeli borders and establishment of a new political order in the
Middle East. Unlike the successes from their operational objectives, they failed to achieve the
political aims. In the first political aim, Israel paid a heavy political price for ganging up with
Britain and France against the emergent forces of Arab nationalism. In the second political aim
involving Israel's borders, Israel was forced to disgorge all the territory it had conquered. The third
aim however, written by Shlaim tends to contradict Moshe Dayan's view that the 'victory in Sinai
meant that Israel emerged as a state that would be welcomed as a friend and ally.' While this may
not be directed at Arab nations, it may have been implied in terms of relations with foreign powers.
Although Ben Gurion failed to topple Nasser and achieve his political aims, the Suez War had
allowed Gurion to force Sharett's resignation which initially gave him the option of launching a war
against Egypt. Moreover, Shlaim contends that Israel and Ben Gurion learned two important lessons
from its experience in the Suez War. Firstly, Israel must rely on nuclear deterrence to protect its
borders rather than expanding it. Secondly, Israel was to depend on the US in future decision
making and must deal and directly consult with the US

The Western Wall
Today we look at the temple that existed in Christ's day, and the remaining wall.
http://andnowyouknowmore.blogspot.com
King Herod refashioned this Temple into an edifice of great splendor.
This temple, the last divinely approved sanctuary of the Jewish dispensation was refurbished by
Herod the Great commencing in 19 B.C. It had been built in the days of Ezra, and was defiled and
cleansed again in the days of the Maccabees, and was now raised to new heights of grandeur. Its
construction was still going forward when Jesus blessed its courts with his presence, and it was not
completed in every respect until A.D. 64, just six years before its last destruction.
Herod complained that the Temple of Zerubbabel was built like a fortress and was shorter ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
our professor took the class to visit the wall. We were instructed not to face the wall as we could be
mistaken for praying and would be arrested by the Jordanian police.
There are several stories as to why it is called the "Wailing Wall".
Many believe that the Wailing Wall got its name because millions of Jews cry, (praying, wailing),
over the destruction of the Temple. There are times the Wall gets covered with small water drops,
resemble tears, for no known reason. Many felt that the wall was crying. Last reported time the wall
"cried" was in 1940. Scientists still cannot explain the reason of such "crying".
There is a legend that on the "crying" day a white dove flies down to the Wall and sits still on one of
its stones. It cries out with a sad voice resembling human moaning.
According to the Talmud that reads that when the Temple was destroyed, all the Gates of Heaven
were closed, except for one: the Gate of Tears. At the Wall, Jews have always poured their hearts out
to God. Thus it became known as the "Wailing Wall" because of the centuries of endless tears, shed
by Jews yearning to rebuild

Analysis Of The Handmaid's Tale By Margaret Atwood
"Freedom is the oxygen of the soul, "Moshe Dayan once said. Freedom is the power or right to act,
speak, or think as one wants without hindrance or restraint. Having freedom and being free is a
privilege, a privilege that is denied to many. Without freedom individuals lose the opportunity to
think as they wish, and express themselves and, most importantly lose touch with the person they
truly are. In the novel, The Handmaids Tale by, Margaret Atwood freedom that had once been alive
and present has been taken away from the people of Gilead. Before time in the state of Gilead
freedom was something every citizen was presented with, but when a coup takes place and the
government collapses that privilege is taken away. The women of the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Even today the dominant ideology is freedom and a belief of a better country. In the novel, Aunt
Lydia stated," Freedom to and freedom from. In the days of anarchy, it was freedom to. Now you are
being given freedom from. Don't underrate it" (Atwood, 156.) What the character meant by this
quote was that there are two kinds of freedom. The freedom that they had before, the freedom that
they were given to dress how they desired and were permitted to read, write, and spend money are
described as freedom to. Now they are in the state of horrible conditions and are not allowed to do
whatever they want and to make their own decision therefore it is freedom from. With all this being
said the character says that they should still be grateful for what little freedom they have left and not
mourn for the freedom they had in the past. The thematic relationship between freedom to and
freedom from has been historically present, but instead it is the other way around. The people of our
country now have freedom to while many decades before the people had freedom from. To mention
if something is culture specific means to mention something that pertains to a specific culture. The
culture of Gilead was taken away from them with their freedom. The people of

Essay on The Arab-Israeli Conflict
There were many factors which contributed to the wars between the Arabs and Israelis in 1956,
1967 and 1973. One of which was President Nasser's personality.
In the 1950's a new president, Gamal Abdul Nasser, came to power in Egypt. President Nasser had a
very strong and determined character and was very eager to get revenge on the Israelis for the 1948
war, which Egypt lost. President Nasser wanted to get Palestine back into the Arab control and to do
this he had to unite the Arab world under his control. In order to get what he wanted Nasser needed
money and arms.
Czechoslovakia was giving aid in the form of money and weaponry to the Egyptians. The reason
they did this was because they ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
President Nasser also persuaded King Hussein of Jordan to help the Fedayeen by allowing them to
go through Jordanian territory, to carry out their attacks.
The west were frightened of losing their influence in the Middle East and thus they, along with
Israel, decided to make a joint attack on Egypt.
This factor therefore led to great conflicts between the Arabs and Israelis.
b) Choose one factor which you think was the most important in causing the war. (9 marks)
From the list of factors given, I consider that the Russian foreign policy was the most important in
causing the wars in 1956, 1967 and 1973 between the Arab's and Israelis.
During the Arab–Israeli conflict, the world's two greatest 'super–powers', USA and the USSR were
in a cold war against each other. Since they were bitter enemies, it is evident that once the USSR
found out that the USA were helping Israel in the war, it decided to help the Arabs in rivalry.
The Suez–Sinai war in 1956 was when the USSR first helped the Arabs by providing them with
military arms and equipment. Since Czechoslovakia was under the influence of the USSR and it was
the main country to provide the Arab world with fighter planes, warships, bombers, tanks and guns,
it was seen as though the USSR were directly providing help for the Arabs. It can be seen that
without all the USSR's military

Comparing Shlomo Yitzchaki And Rav Moshe Feinstein
Ralph Waldo Emerson, an American writer of poetry, lecturer, essayist and leader of the
Transcendentalist movement in the 19th century once said, "A great man is always willing to be
little". Meaning that the best, brightest, strongest, bravest, smartest, most courageous people are
always willing to "duck down" to their colleagues level and make them feel as equals even though
they aren't. This quote could not better describe the greatest people of their respective generations,
Rav Shlomo Yitzchaki (a.k.a Rashi) and Rav Moshe Feinstein. These two great Jewish men asserted
themselves as leader of the Jewish people in each of their times and fought valiantly for to keep the
Jewish people together through arguably the two greatest ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Rav Shlomo Yitzchaki was born to Rabbi Yitzchak and his wife (not much is known about her) in
1040 in the town of Troyes, located in Northeastern France historically southeast of Paris and as the
Capital of Champagne, where some say he received his early education. His father's distinguished
family traced itself back to Rabbi Yochanan Hasandlar, a student of the tanna, a torah sage around
the end of the second Jewish Temple, Rabbi Akiva ben Yosef, lived from about 50 C.E to about 132
C.E, and from there to King David, who was leader of the ancient Israelite kingdom as it retook its
homeland. His mother was the sister of Rabbi Shimon Hazaken, the elder. With his wife, Rashi had
three daughters but no sons, and their names were Yocheved, who married Rabbi Meir ben Shmuel
(one of Rashi's greatest students), Miriam who married Yehuda be Nathan (also known as the Rivan,
the completer of Rashi's commentary to the tractate of Makkot), and Rachel. In turn, their children
the Rashbam, Rabbenu Tam etc. who became later known as the tosafist were practically
commentators on Rashi comments. When it came to supporting his family, Rashi supported them
through wine although it's unclear what he did in the process of it's creation, whether it was creating
it or selling it. Furthermore, he was the unofficial Rabbi of the entire Troyes/Europe, because he was
the greatest torah scholar of his time and had his own Yeshiva. Therefore, he probably received
money through answering people's halachic questions. Unfortunately, on July 13, 1105 Rashi died at
the age of 65, yet had managed to be recognized as the foremost leader of his generations and write
a commentary on more than no one had done before him or after him. To conclude, Rashi

Essay about Anwar Sadats Decision To Make
Throughout time the decisions made by an individual or a group, such as President Anwar Sadat and
his decision to make peace with Israel has dramatically changed the course of history. Every leader
in history has made a decision that has affected the world, or just his nation in some way. After
many years of struggling to keep peace among the Jews and Arabs, President Anwar Sadat, finally
decided to make peace with Israel. Peace between Israel and Egypt would mean great changes were
going to take place. This momentous decision would be a large step up for the two nations and
would lead to them better lives, in peace. Before the Egyptian Israeli Peace Pact was signed in 1978,
Palestine and Israel were enemies with each other in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They didn't think that the Arabs would have the nerve to attack on the holiest day. Since it is a fast
day, that made it worse, since the soldiers were considerably weaker on that day. Nine Arab states
helped along with the Egyptian–Syrian war effort. The Yom Kippur War ended as a tie. A tie didn't
look good for Israel, since they had won all of the previous wars, however it looked better for the
Arabs. In 1978, the Camp David Accords were signed between Israeli Prime Minister, Menachem
Begin, and Egyptian President, Anwar Sadat, in Maryland at Camp David along with US President
Jimmy Carter as a witness. The Camp David Accords first began when President Sadat took a trip to
Jerusalem to discuss the topic of peace between Egypt and Israel with Prime Minister Begin. This
visit started talks between the two countries and had them developing peace negotiations. In the
midst of creating peace, there was a period where nothing else was being done. Since there was a
deadlock, President Carter invited both Sadat and Begin to Camp David to work out a permanent
peace agreement. The Camp David Accords were signed in September, 1978. In March 1979, the
peace treaty, better known as the Egyptian Israeli Peace Pact, was completely finished and was
finally signed. The Egyptian Israeli Peace Pact was signed in 1979 in Washington. The treaty has
nine articles. The treaty has a military

Historical Fiction Book Report of The Hope by Herman Wouk
Historical Fiction Book Report:
The Hope by: Herman Wouk
The book The Hope is the story of Zev Barak, Benny Luria, Sam Pasternak, Kishote, four of Israel's
army officers during the major battles and struggles of Israel from 1948 until 1967. The War of
Independence, The Six Day War, and the 1956 Sinai Campaigns were all major events that had
major effects on Israel.
The book starts out with the war of independence in the town of Latrun with the Haganah 7th
brigade. The battle of Latrun was a battle that took place in beginning phases of the war. This battle
was a failure to the Haganah 7th brigade, which was newer formed unit. The main road between Tel
Aviv and Jerusalem which was commanded by the Latrun fortress. Arab forces were trying to take
over the fortress and deny jews from entering into Jerusalem. This particular battle and the events
depicted around and about the battle in the book are events and occurrences of actual history but it is
a simplified version of the events, of course. But the things that are not actual or real things in
history are the characters. Sam Pasternak is the fictional character used to illustrate the tasks of
Colonel Chaim Herzog which was a Israeli army officer who became an army general, later a
popular historian of the military, and then took on Israel's envoy to the UN, he even took on two
terms as President of Israel. The story of "Burma Road" in the book, like the battle of Latrun, is
simplified. All though, in the

Necessary Covenants
How can we forget Gods watchful eye over His glory and covenant with us, it will stand responsible
to all generations as a memorial to Jesus Christ and His blood sacrifice over us.
We find it hard to understand covenants since have never entered into a covenantal relationship. Our
society relies on contractual agreements and the non–binding consequences and that we feel
augmentative after a period of time and can be broken. The closest to a covenantal agreement on the
continent of the United States was the American Indian and the Mafia. A covenant is binding
agreement to death between individuals or tribes and is strengthened by all parties involved with the
swearing of an oath and mingling of blood. It is established by either the slaughter ... Show more
I will bless those who bless you, and the one who curses you I will curse. And in you all the families
of the earth will be blessed."
Gen 15:5 God took Abraham outside and said, "Now look toward the heavens, and count the stars, if
you are able to count them." And He said to him, "So shall your descendants be."
9 God said to Abraham, "Bring Me a three year old heifer, and a three year old female goat, and a
three year old ram, and a turtledove, and a young pigeon." 10 Then he brought all these to Him and
cut them in two, and laid each half opposite the other; but he did not cut the birds.
12 Now when the sun was going down, a deep sleep fell upon Abram; and behold, terror and great
darkness fell upon him. 17 It came about when the sun had set, that it was very dark, and behold,
there appeared a smoking firepot and a flaming torch which passed between these pieces.
The Second Covenant 18 And on that same day the LORD said, "To your descendants I have given
this land, from the river of Egypt as far as the great river, the river Euphrates. That's a much larger
area, than Israel has acquired to date. Evidently another war is coming. God doesn't forget His

A Brief Story of Yitzhak Rabin
1. Introduction
On the evening of November 4, 1995, it was the time to celebrate the joyfully weekend. But for the
peace–loving people, particularly for the peace–loving people in Israel and Arab, it was actually a
black weekend. It was precisely that evening, one of the creators of Palestinian–Israeli peace, who
was known as peaceful warrior, Yitzhak Rabin, Premier of Israeli, was murdered by an assassin. The
world had shocked, his imposing and heartrending life, became the focal point of the people
immediately. All the peace–lovers were sorrowful for his death. They burst into tears for him,
prayed for him, wished his soul to be serene in heaven.
A peace dove had been gunned down; a peace warrior was falling down with several ... Show more
During the war, many of his friends and comrades fell down. From July to December of 1948, he
served as operations with the rank of lieutenant colonel. Soon he was masterminding a successful
campaign wich drove the Egyptians and Jordanians from the Negev desert in Operations Yoav, Lot,
Assaf, Horev and Uvdah. In 1949 he took part in the Israeli–Egyptian armistice negotiations in
Rhodes.
2.4 Service in the Israel Defense Forces
In 1949, Rabin was appointed commander of the I.D.F.'s first course for battalion and promoted to
colonel. In 1950 he was the head of the General Staff's Operations Division. One of the most
important tasks for him was organizing transit camps for over 100,000 new immigrants who began
streaming into Israel immediately after independence. In January 1954, Rabin was promoted to
major general and was appointed head of the General Staff Training Division. From 1956 to 1959 he
headed the Northern Command. In May 1959 he became chief of the Operations Branch. Rabin was
named deputy chief of staff in January 1961. He was appointed the seventh chief of staff in
January1964. In the Six–Day War, June 1967, the I.D.F.'s state of readiness under his command
emerged with a stunning victory. They defeating Arab armies on three fronts and occupying the
Sinai Peninsula, the Golan Heights, the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
2.5 Diplomatic Service
Leaving military in 1968, Rabin took the position of ambassador to the United States., for five
years. It

The Affect Of The Six-Day War On Israel
Terrorism and war have affected Israel, and the people living there, ever since they became their
own nation. Over the long history of Jerusalem it has been destroyed twice, besieged 23 times
attacked 52 times, and captured and recaptured 44 times. Jerusalem was established by King David
as the capital city of Israel, however there has since been a struggle of which religion should occupy
the region. Christians and Muslims have been fighting a long time to control the land of Israel
because they both feel they are entitled to it. The Muslims believe Muhammad's armies founded
Israel. On the other hand, the Christians feel positive that the land should be theirs because they
founded it first. Numerous people have died over the years for ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Arab nations were trying to eliminate Israel and take away the shame they felt after they were
defeated a few years earlier when they fought Israel. The countries against Israel united together and
planned out the war thinking it would be a piece of cake. Moreover, Israel fended off the countries
and won the war in six days hence the name the Six–Day War. General Mordechai Hod, who was a
commanding general for the Israeli Air Force, said about the Six–Day War, "The dangers of Israel's
extermination was hardly present before the Six–Day War" (Dodd and Mead Co). The Six–Day War
increased the number of terrorist attacks that Israel has now, this is because many countries are not
fans of Israel and are upset about the way they lost the war. The countries that fought Israel used a
billion dollars worth of supplies during the war, causing serious debt. The Six–Day War changed the
events that happened in Israel and the ones that are still occurring in Israel. Israel gained some
respect because of how they won the war against all the countries facing them in the Six–Day War.
Furthermore, Israel gained respect from some of the countries. Even though Israel had a small
population they put up a tough fight. Israel showed resilience during the Six–Day War, and since the
war they have been able to protect their

Comparison OfMuch Madness Is Divinest Sense, By John...
"Freedom" is a word which defines a lot of things from a different perspective because "Freedom is
the Oxygen of the Soul," says Moshe Dayan. We know that freedom means free from something and
this something could be one thing for different people from different position and place. To make a
connection or contrast between " On Liberty " by John Stuart Mill with " Much Madness is Divinest
Sense " by Emily Dickison and " Daddy " by Sylvia Plath, the primary key terms are –Freedom,
Majority, Minority, Social Liberty, Authority, and Mankind. " On Liberty " Mill didn't say what he
believes, but he explained the reality of our society that we have to face in every moment like the "
Tyranny Of The Majority ." On the other side, the poems are used different metaphors to express the
feelings of the writers exactly what they were thinking or intuiting at that moments. Like as – "
Much Madness is Divinest Sense " ( Dickinson,492 ) or " Daddy, I have had to kill you ." By the
punctuation, metaphors, word choices, and comparing images, Emily Dickinson and Sylvia Plath
state that if you are not a part or member of the " Tyrannical Majority " the society will deprive you
of the liberty and your life.
In the Emily Dickinson's poem, "Much Madness is Divinest Sense," reflects a feminism outlook to
our society. In every lineation, the writer expresses her anger towards her community by the term
"Madness." She utilizes her poem to describe the feelings of a person because of the rejection from

Princess Masako Analysis
Moshe Dayan, an Israeli military leader and politician, once exclaimed that "Freedom is the oxygen
of the soul." Humans need to have freedom in order to live happily, similar to how the body needs
oxygen to survive. Without liberation, one will start to break down mentally and physically. In the
novel, Princess Masako, written by Ben Hills, Masako Owada is a commoner that was very
studious, outspoken, and she enjoyed playing softball as well as tennis; she experiences the feeling
of having no freedom. This story uncovers the harsh reality of Masako's journey before and after
marrying the prince of the Chrysanthemum throne, Naruhito Hironomiya, which includes her
moving to many places with her family, her efforts in getting a job, and her ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Although it was not likely for a child to successfully complete their education while missing out on
important parts of their schooling, Masako did the impossible by achieving a great amount in her
academic career (Hills 47). In brief, Masako's childhood contributed to the development of her
adaptability to her environment.
Next, Masako Owada showed determination in not only her school work, but also in her efforts
towards achieving her dream job: a diplomat in the Foreign Ministry. Within the Japanese culture,
women are considered to be a group of cheap, expendable, and unskilled workers until they are
married; then they no longer have a job (Hills 113). Keeping this in mind, Masako knew that she
needed to overcome the gender inequality in order to reach her goal, and no person or lack of
education neither got in her way nor discouraged her. She graduated from Harvard University and
from the University of Tokyo to fill in the gaps of her education for the Foreign Ministry entrance
exam (Hills 109 and 115). In addition, Hills puts into perspective how competitive and how male–
dominated the Foreign Ministry entrance exam was by stating that "...of 800 people nationwide who
sat for the exam, only 28 passed. And of those 28, only three were women" (Hills 115). Despite all
odds, Masako passed this entrance exam, which in turn, exhibits her determined nature when

Myerhoff: An Anthropologist? Essay
In studying the Jewish elderly members of the Center, Myerhoff attempted to understand the people
there as an isolated society with a distinct culture. Through participant observation, as well as
carefully recorded interviews and conversations, Myerhoff aimed to document this culture and
understand it as a basis for unity among the Center members. Her immersion in this culture along
with her anthropological perspective made her successful in representing the people of the Center.
In her book, Number the Days, Myerhoff provides readers with an ethnographic analysis of the
existence of a culture. After reading the book, I feel that I have a comprehensive understanding of
the Center people. Through her descriptions, based on ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Despite initial assumptions and unanticipated intricacies of the group, I feel that Myerhoff
successfully illustrated the distinctness and many facets of this culture that formed in response to the
subsystems of Judaism and old age, as well as gender and the surrounding environment.
In order to understand any culture, it is essential to acknowledge the importance of taking a holistic
view. This approach, which gained recognition and validation in the twentieth century, stresses the
importance of accounting for all of the components of a culture. The concept requires an
understanding of each subsystem, which dictates certain aspects of the culture being studied. With
this theory as basis for her approach, Myerhoff is faced with the difficult task of piecing together the
many parts contributing to the formation of the culture at the Center, while simultaneously
recognizing the distinctions between the acting subsystems. Sometimes it seems that realizing what
leads to specific cultural constructs would be extremely difficult; this is especially the case with
traits that have become so naturalized that only an outsider would recognize them as distinct and
significant. That said, it is obvious that there are advantages to studying a completely exotic culture,
as the majority of anthropologists do; however, Myerhoff chose to do her fieldwork in a culture that
is centered

The Yom Kippur War
Militaries, intelligence analysts, and policy makers have had to face complex and delicate problems
like issues of surprise attacks in their respective countries. Such rare occurrences are particularly
true for nations like Israel, as demonstrated in 1973 during the Yom Kippur War. It was on October
6, 1973, the "Day of Atonement" for Jews locally called Yom Kippur, when Israel was surprisingly
attacked along its Golan Heights and on its positions in the much–contested Sinai Peninsula by
Syrian and Egyptian forces. The invaders had an advantage over their rivals as most Israeli soldiers
were observing Yom Kippur away from their usual posts. The vaunted Israeli commanders sent the
Israeli Defense Forces reeling, eventually beating back the offensive. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
While all respondents agreed that state political and military intelligence leaders gave misguiding
information resulting to the devastating events of the war, 13 and 11 respondents pointed out errors
and biases related to political and religious inclinations respectively.
Discussion
Although the first tables were not in the main purpose of the study, the data sets they present
describe demographic numbers of the respondents with regard to their experience in the state and
military offices of the Israeli nation. This would ensure validity of results of the surveys based on
knowledge of the subject question. The findings acquired from the surveys was cross–analyzed with
the data collected from multiple literature, archived records and study reports on the Yom Kippur
War to form a pattern that was consistent with past findings, which concur that indeed that
intelligence information was inaccurately evaluated by political and military intelligence leaders of
Israel resulting in flawed decisions in the 1973 Yom Kippur

Essay The Architecture of Moshe Safde
Moshe Safdie is an architect who really examines how a building can shape an area. Not only how
the space may look but its functionality, impact on the environment, and impact on the surrounding
community. He seeks to engage and enrich the communities making unique and inviting spaces to
fit the needs of each project. (Safdie Architects) One of Safdie's most well known buildings is
Habitat 67 (or Habitat). The concept of Habitat began in Safdie's master's thesis. He submitted the
idea to the 1967 World Exhibition and, when it was accepted, established his own firm to help see
its completion. (Safdie Architects) A series of carefully planned and stacked concrete blocks,
Habitat seeks to create a space where every resident of the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Yad Vashem Children's Memorial was initially built in 1987. The original building is tunneled
through the hillside as he envisioned. The room with the photographs became the Hall of Names. A
big circular shaped ceiling holds hundreds of pictures of the children who had died. The next room
an eternal flame burns. There is a voice that plays that gives the names, places of birth, and ages at
death of each of the children that died. The voice does not repeat for six months. After going
through this room, a hallway takes you back out into the sunlight out the side of the hill overlooking
the mountains of Judea. (Safdie Architects) Eventually the museum was expanded and reworked and
Safdie was hired for part of this as well. (Arc Space) Marina Bay Sands is a 845,000 square meter
area and a $5.7 billion build cost project that was constructed in Singapore. It consists of a hotel,
casino, shops and restaurants, a convention center, the Museum of ArtScience, and topped 55 stories
up with a 9,941 square meter "SkyPark". The SkyPark is also the world's largest cantilever
stretching 65 meters (213 feet) beyond the roof of the last skyscraper. It also contains seven site–
specific works of public art handpicked by Safdie. (Saieh) It offers a full 360 degree view of the city
from the top and the towers were designed to frame the city from a distance. (Arc Space) This is one
of

Six-day War and Israeli Military Leaders
Why was Israel so successful in dealing with threats to its survival in the years 1948–73?
Israel's success in dealing with the treats it came across was due to many factors. These included
Israel's military tactics; which is one of the most important ones. Israeli determination for an
independent state, the disunity between the Arab people, territory and the role of the US all played a
part in the triumph of Israeli survival in the years 1948 – 73.
Israeli military tactics were a long–term factor of why Israel was so extraordinary at dealing with
everything that was thrown at them. Israel's troops were highly motivated and better trained than
any Middle Eastern country as the Israelis fought beside Britain in WWII. Additionally ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This included the recognition of Israeli borders and it's right to security. Which also played a part in
Israel's survival.
Furthermore Israeli determination of independence was yet another factor why Israel successfully
dealt with its threats. The Law of return gave any Jew in the world the right to become a citizen of
Israel. The UN passed a solution calling for the partition of Palestine. It recognized the right of the
Palestinian people to self–determination, as the partition plan allowed for the establishment of an
Arab state. It let the Palestinians to be considered as refugees and war victims as some of the
Palestinian people had just been affected by the holocaust. This then lead to world opinion of the
survivors to be very sympathetic which assisted them as soon after they were granted the right to
secure themselves and return to their homeland and gain independence.
Besides Israeli determination of Independence, the lack of Arab unity also made an appearance into
how Israel survived so successfully. The lack of Arab co–ordination in the 6–day war really affected
Israel, as they were able to us the Napoleonic Strategy. This meant they could attack each Syria,
Egypt and Jordan one at a time. This gave the Israeli military enough time and effort to deal with the
Arab armies who opposed them separately

Essay on Israeli Settlements
On the 17th of April 2012, Palestinian Authority President, Mahmoud Abbas, sent a letter to Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu indicating the only way the Palestinian Authority would agree
to move forward with peace talks is if Israel would agree to freeze the building of settlements in the
West Bank1. Israeli settlements in the West Bank have become the largest obstacle in negotiating a
two–state solution and it appears the continued expansion of Israeli settlements may render a two–
state solution impossible. Inside the Israeli government following the 1967 war there was a debate
about how to deal with the newly occupied territories of the West Bank, Gaza Strip, Sinai Peninsula,
and Golan Heights. The debate revolved around two ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
With Israel's border needs in mind, Allon proposed a multifaceted solution for Israel's occupation of
the West Bank. He suggested Israel would incorporate the Jordan Valley, the Judean desert along the
west coast of the Dead Sea, the area surrounding the Jerusalem metropolitan area, and a small tract
of land south west of the Palestinian city of Hebron6. This configuration of newly incorporated land
was designed to "provide Israel with the minimal defensible borders that are indispensable without
impairing, to any meaningful extent, the basic interests of the other side, including those of the
Palestinian community"7. It is important to note that Allon envisioned that the non–incorporated
"Palestinian" parts of the West Bank would remain free of Israeli settlers and would eventually be
handed back to the Kingdom of Jordan in order to form a future Jordanian–Palestinian state. The
second important part of Allon's plan is the use of a "selective settlement policy" within the
incorporated areas of the West Bank as part of Israel's defense strategy8. The selective settlement
policy allowed for Israelis to settle in the West Bank, but only in areas lacking large Palestinian
cities and villages. Unfortunately, the Allon Plan failed to account for the religious fundamentalism
that would motivate much of the settlement building in the West Bank.
Founded in 1974, the Gush Emunim movement strongly advocated the return of Jews to the

How Is the Situation Today Between Israelis and...
The recent affair in Israel seems to be escalating everyday as the Israelis and Palestinians are
clashing over the costs of past events and the conflict has been one of the most unstable and
constant wars in modern world history. The Israeli military have continued to occupy Palestinian
Territories and on a daily basis, inhabitants of those lands have been killed, injured or kidnapped.
Despite recent major Israeli violence, Palestinians have created pacific marches and demonstrations
in the West Bank and Gaza, to retaliate. There have been attempts by other nations such as
neighbouring Arab nations, the USA, Britain and USSR, to solve the crisis, although, their
intervention have seemed to make the situation even worse. According to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
According to the report of the UNSCOP in August 1947, the UN were going to help with the
partition about investigating the situation in Palestine and to "submit such proposals as it may
consider appropriate solution for the problem of Palestine," but they wouldn't interfere with other
affairs in Palestine after that. This report is reliable because it was written by the UN and they stood
by their word. Thereby, I believe this contributed to the Palestinian expulsion during the war of
1948–49, because there being no UN interference could have meant that the Israelis felt they had
major authority to aggressively terrorise the Palestinians, as they were also under their control, so
approximately 711,000 people fled or were expelled from the State of Israel, according to the UN.
Revisionist historian, Ilan Pappé, published the book, 'A History of Modern Palestine' in 2004 which
suggests that he believes the Israelis were wrong for "implementing a systematic expulsion of the
local population," which was predominantly Palestinian. This is extremely reliable information
because Pappé is a Jew, yet he argues against his people; this shows that he is not biased. Also, the
fact that he is a revisionist historian shows that he has departed from the Israeli national ethos of
believing that they are not primarily to be charged for the dead end. However, Einstein stated that he
would "much rather see reasonable

Arab Military Performance During The World War II
Within the modern military era, Arabic–speaking armies have traditionally shown themselves to
generally ineffective. From the 1960s, where Egyptian regular forces performed poorly against
Yemeni irregulars, to the '70s, where the Syrians only managed to impose their will upon Lebanon
through the utilisation of their overwhelming weight of weaponry and numbers. The Iraqis army
demonstrated their own ineptitude in the 1980s, firstly with their wars with Iran, where their
opponents were in possession of an army ripped apart by internal revolutionary turmoil showed
ineptness against an Iranian military ripped apart by revolutionary turmoil in the 1980s, and
secondly in their failure to win a three–decades–long war against the Kurds. Even with the
intervention of Western powers, Arab military performance has remained poor, especially on both
sides of the 1990 Kuwait war, where they performance was at best mediocre.4 Despite all these
examples however, the primary military area in which Arabic armies have performed poorly is in
their wars with Israel, where despite three Arabic attempts to conquer Israel with conventional
warfare in 1948, 1967 and 1973, Israel has always emerged victorious. And the Arabs have done
poorly in nearly all the military confrontations with Israel. In an article for the Middle East
Quarterly in 1999 titled "Why Arabs Lose Wars", Norvell De Atkine, a U.S. Army retired colonel
with eight years residence in Lebanon, Jordan, and Egypt, and a graduate

Arab Israeli Conflict Dbq
The Arab Israeli conflict is one of the major dilemmas in the world in the modern history. Many
political leaders assume that this is the most complicated conflict around the world, even bigger than
Cold War. During the 1960's and the 1970's, the Arab world decided to go with confrontation and
fight fire with fire. The Middle East became a war zone where all the Arab countries lined up to win
back Palestine. However, the Israeli cabinet was smart enough to maintain their presence in the
Palestinian Land. Nevertheless, many Arabic Leaders did not manage the war against Israel
vigorously.
There were many other reasons that caused the tense relationship between Nasser and the western
powers. However the Arab– Israeli conflict was the biggest ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The declaration was written by the United Kingdom's Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour. The
declaration was directed to the Zionist community where it stated:
His Majesty's government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the
Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being
clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of
existing non–Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in
any other country.
This declaration triggered the hatred of the Arabs towards the Jewish people, ringing the bells of an
unending war. This shows that Britain was the biggest ally of the Jewish state during the early 20th
century.
Soon the USA was able to substitute the British role. After WWII, the Jewish society were able to
deliver the tragedy that took place in Germany; they were able to influence the ultimate powers in
the world, convening them that the Nazis tortured the Jewish people and burned them down to death
during the Holocaust. Therefore the Jewish people were able to gain the sympathy of all Europe and
the USA. The Jews were really clever in utilizing this event to sustain Palestine. They convinced the
world that they are the population that was labored throughout history; and all they are asking for is
to live peacefully in their holly land. Furthermore, many of the six

The Egyptian Syrian Attack Of September 1973
Assess the reasons for Israel's unpreparedness for the Egyptian Syrian attack of October 1973
The Egyptian Syrian attack that took place on Yon Kippur is a hugely significant event in the history
of the Arab Israeli conflict. Often referred to as 'the trauma', the attack revealed a number of key
issues with regards to Israeli defence and intelligence that ultimately resulted in a severe lack of
preparation. Israel was unprepared for a plethora of interlinking issues that resulted in a series of
fatal mistakes with regard to intelligence and military preparedness. With regards intelligence, an
entrenched and overconfident conviction in 'the Concept' blinded the Israeli's to the concrete
evidence and forewarnings of the Egyptian Syrian mobilization. The ingenuity of the Egyptian's was
also crucial to Israeli unpreparedness, especially the deployment of the almost certain double agent
– Ashraf Marwan.
The 'Concept' is the first significant reason why Israel was grossly unprepared for the attack – she
did not expect it and this was blunder of her own making. Upon official investigation into the errors
of Israeli preparation, the 1975 Agranat Commission highlighted Israel's Military Intelligence
Directorate – Aman – had 'persistently adhered' to a single incorrect 'Concept' regarding Egypt's
attack capabilities, disregarding other key intelligence as a result. This 'Concept' was that Egypt
would not wage war on the Israeli's before she had, firstly, acquired long range attack

Essay On Israel

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Lindsay Alston

More from Lindsay Alston (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Essay On Israel