Supreme Court Cases Essay

Supreme Court Case Analysis
"Under the Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction, the Court hears cases appealed from federal
courts of appeals, or it may hear appeals from federal district courts in certain circumstances in
which an act of Congress has been held unconstitutional" (Bohm & Haley, pp. 278, 2011). The
appellate powers also extend to cases from states higher courts as long as the appeals are limited
to violations of federal law or constitutional rights. In fact, the Supreme Court is primarily an
appellate court, however, "the Supreme Court also has original jurisdiction... to two types of cases:
(1) cases involving representatives of foreign governments; and (2) certain cases in which a state is
a party" (Bohm & Haley, pp. 279, 2011). While the topic of judicial...show more content...
First, strict constructionists believe "that the Constitution should be implemented as written, and if
any changes are to take place in rights, responsibilities, or liberties, the changes should take place
through the political system (Congress)" (Pollock, pp. 320, 2017). Conversely, Interpretationists
view the Constitution is as an ever–evolving document that encompasses issues that should have
been addressed during its creation. As such, the differences in how the Constitution is viewed
result in conflicting views that directly correlate to various understandings of the law. The Third
District Court of Appeals made note, "that it is well settled that judge can form "mental
impressions" but it is prohibited from prejudging the case, i.e. "making up their mind""
(Pankauski & Hauser, 2015). Moreover, to prejudge was defined as deciding before having heard all
of the evidence. The Supreme Court is indeed biased, as it is unavoidable because all human
beings are fallible. However, it cannot be considered prejudgment solely because their path of
reasoning is understood beforehand. As long as all aspects of the case are considered before a
decision is reached the case is not
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Argumentative Essay: The Supreme Court
"It will be of little avail to the people, that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the
laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be
understood"(James Madison, Federalist 62). The Constitution, despite being precise in some areas,
like how many years a president can serve, is vague and can be interpreted in many ways, and the
one to interpret it is the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is the final arbiter in all the legal
proceedings that one case should undergo. They are are supposedly unbiased, and free from any
political pressures. The chief justice can either exercise his powers with restraint or with activism,
like the Burger Court, but what will happen if the Supreme Court intervened

United States Supreme Court Justices Essay
United States Supreme Court Justices The current Supreme Court membership is comprised of nine
Supreme Court Justices. One of which is the Chief Justice and the other eight are the Associate
Justices. The Justices are Chief Justice John Roberts, Jr., and Associate Justices: John Paul Stevens,
Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, David H. Souter, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg,
Stephen G. Breyer and Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr. Chief Justice John Roberts, Jr., was sworn into
the Supreme Court on September 29, 2005 and was nominated by President George W. Bush. John
Roberts, Jr., took the place of Chief Justice William Renquist after he passed away and the seat
became open. His political affiliation is Republican and he has worked for...show more content...
He attended the University of Chicago and after serving in the Navy he attended the Northwestern
University Law School and graduated with the highest grades in the law school history. He has
been married twice and has a son and three daughters from his first wife. Associate Justice Antonin
Scalia was sworn into the Supreme Court on September 26, 1986 and was nominated by President
Ronald Reagan. He took the place of Associate Justice William H. Renquist when Renquist was
sworn in as Chief Justice. Justice Antonin Scalias' political affiliation is Republican. Justice Antonin
started his career as a commercial lawyer for a brief period. He then taught Law at The University
of Virginia. After about 4 years of teaching he went into government service starting under President
Nixon and then President Ford. During President Carters reign, Justice Antonin left government
service to go back to teaching law. He went back into government service under President Reagans
administration and was appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Washington D.C. Justice Antonin
Scalia attended Georgetown University and graduated as the Valedictorian of his class. He then
went on to attend and graduate from Harvard Law School. He is married and had nine children.
Associate Justice Anthony M. Kennedy was sworn into the Supreme Court on February 18, 1988
and was nominated by President Ronald Reagan. He took the place of Associate

Supreme Court Case Analysis
Opinion The order of law is the utmost importance of maintaining a safe and healthy society. And
with upholding these laws, sometimes our laws come within conflict or cause confusion between
rights of parties both seeking justice. And today, we indeed face a conflict created from past
Supreme Court rulings, legislation, and constitutional powers. In this contested court for the manner
of Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III v. City of Chicago, we must first look at the questions before
us. Can the Attorney General create conditions upon the Byrne grant program? And in doing so, is
placing the conditions become a means of coercion? The City of Chicago has argued that the actions
that the Attorney General and the President have enacted are...show more content...
Chicago argues that the courts overturned the Brady Act because of the unconstitutionality of a
federal registry maintained by the government as it is direct violation of state sovereignty. This
does seem at odds within the Constitution's supremacy clause, that if state law and federal law are
within conflict of one another, federal law is to be observed overall. The constitution is unclear,
but the "right to bear arms" and "shall not be infringed" is clear enough for majority opinion to
conclude an unconstitutionality of the Brady Act within this argument. State sovereignty is
impeded by enticing the state government to enforce federal law. By doing this, it's clear to many
that may think Congress could potentially conspire to legislate all the work stateside and reap any
benefits with little effort. A view that keeps these powers in check from becoming tyrannical and
overbearing. Moving to a case that is similar in essence to the Prinz v. United States case. Reno v.
Condon (2000) is similar as it pertains to the issue of state sovereignty again. In 1994, there was
high concern about the rampant unsolicited confidential information being bought and sold by states
obtained by the state DMV. Congress, as an answer to this rampant invasion of privacy by passing
the Driver's Privacy Protection Act (DDPA). A bill that restricted the ability of a state to disclose
confidential information without the

The Power Of The Supreme Court
The supreme court plays a specific role in the United States government. Then Supreme Court has
the power to check the actions of the president and the congress. Overall, what the Supreme court
does is to make sure no laws violate the constitution and makes sure the president's actions are
allowed by the constitution. The power of that law which is to view the executive and legislative
actions is called judicial review. It is not all–power, just like the rest of the branches, it has limited
power and each branch checks up on each other to make sure one doesn't have too much power on
the others. One of the laws that the Supreme Court decided to change was the issue with abortion.
Roe v. Wadereached the Supreme Court on appeal in 1970 and remained the Supreme Court's most
recognized decision regarding the right of privacy through the Fourteenth Amendment, and mostly
argued whether it was human murder or simply protecting personal liberty and privacy.
In Roe v. Wade, the court looked at a Texas law that did not permit abortion
...show more content...
However, the majority refused to accept this theory and that the due process clause of the fourteenth
amendment was an 'appropriate source' of this case but the court determined it was also "broad
enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy." (Blackmun)
They stated that, and with all respect to the law of Texas, that their belief of life is too general and
debatable and therefore not convincing enough to outweigh the woman's freedom. The court saw
that the states had interests in protecting a woman's health and potential for life so they decided to
even out these concerns by making abortion legal in the early months of pregnancy but not so legal
in the later months of

100-150 Supreme Court Cases
The United States Supreme Court holds about 100–150 cases each year. Most of the cases they hear
are dealing with constitutional rights and federal laws. Des Moines, Iowa in December of 1965
Mary Beth Tinker and a few of her friends decided to protest against the Vietnamese war by wearing
black armbands to school. When school officials found about their protest they thought it would
disrupt school environment and they decided that anyone who refused to remove the armband would
be suspended. On the other hand the students parents believed that they had the right to protest at
school and any interference of school officials would be a violation of their 1st amendment rights. I
believe that the ruling of the Supreme Court of deciding on

Supreme Court Cases Essay
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. vs. Sawyer Also commonly referred to as The Steel Seizure Case,
it was a United States Supreme Court decision that limited the power of the President of the United
States to seize private property in the absence of either specifically enumerated authority under
Article Two of the US Constitution or statutory authority conferred on him by Congress. The
Majority decision was that the President had no power to act except in those cases expressly or
implicitly authorized by the Constitution or an act of Congress. Marbury vs. Madison: A landmark
case in United States Law and the basis for the exercise of judicial review in the United States,
Plessey boarded a car of the East Louisiana Railroad that was designated by whites for use by white
patrons only. Although Plessey was one–eighth black and seven–eighths white, under Louisiana state
law he was classified as an African–American, and thus required to sit in the "colored" car. When
Plessey refused to leave the white car and move to the colored car, he was arrested and jailed. The
Court rejected Plessey's arguments based on the Thirteenth Amendment, seeing no way in which the
Louisiana statute violated it. In addition, the majority of the Court rejected the view that the
Louisiana law implied any inferiority of blacks, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Instead, it
contended that the law separated the two races as a matter of public policy. Smith v. Allwright: An
important decision of the United States Supreme Court with regard to voting rights and, by
extension, racial desegregation. Lonnie E. Smith, a black voter in Texas, sued for the right to vote
in a primary election being conducted by the Democratic Party. The law he challenged allowed the
party to enforce a rule requiring all voters in its primary to be white. At this point in history, the
Republican Party was so weak in the South that most Southern elections were decided by the
outcome of the Democratic primary. Southern States claimed that the Democratic Party was a
private organization, while Smith said that the law in question essentially disenfranchised him by

The Supreme Court Essay example
The Supreme Court At the apex of our federal court system stands the United States Supreme Court.
It stands as the ultimate authority in constitutional interpretation and its decision can be changed
only by a constitutional amendment. Two documents are responsible for its creation which is the
Constitution, which explicitly creates the Supreme Court, and the Judiciary Act of September 24,
1789. The Supreme Court is the only court named in the constitution laying out the Courts basic
jurisdiction, identifying the mode of selection and tenure for justices. Under Article III, Section 1 of
the Constitution provides that "[t]he judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one
Supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the...show more content...
13). The first Supreme Court in 1789 consisted of five justices. Congress added a sixth seat in
1790 and a seventh in 1807 to ease the strain on justices as the number of circuit courts increased.
Congress added the eighth and ninth seats in 1837. Membership stayed at nine until 1863, when
Congress added a tenth seat, only to abolish it when a justice died in 1865. In 1867, Congress
reduced the seats to seven to limit the opportunity of President Jackson to appoint new members.
Congress restored the number of seats to nine in 1869, and in 1891 abolished the Supreme Court
justices' circuit–riding burden. The number of justices has remained fixed at nine, for over 100
years, making tie votes unlikely unless circumstances prevent a justice from participating in
deliberations. There is currently one Chief Justice and eight associate justices in the Supreme Court
although Congress does have the authority to change the number of justices sitting on the Supreme
Court (Van Dervort, 2000, p. 69). Qualifications to become a justice although not spelled out
immediately became obvious. From the beginning, justices have all been lawyers and most have
pursued legal and political careers prior to serving the Court. The attainment of a high position in
government or the legal profession is also beneficial as they lend credibility for the consideration.
Some justices however chose a different path that began with private practice followed by at some
point by elevation to

Supreme Court Case
Supreme Court Case
Happy Villa
May 19, 2014
Loanan Ase
In the case of Robert Tolan and Marian Tolan vs. Jeffrey Wayne Cotton, I will be discussing what
interest me about this case. I will also deliberating on the liability and criminal liability of this case.
The Tolan vs. Cotton case interests me because theUnited States have so many police that are
brutalizing citizens. In some cases the police officers are getting away with it. After reading,
reviewing, and studying this case I have learn a lot about the criminal system and laws that men and
women should obey. I will explain how the nine judges on the Supreme courts all came to a verdict
against the police officer Jeffrey Cotton after he shot an innocent suspect. This people...show more
content...
Accomplice Liability and Criminal Liability Accomplice liability consents the court to find a
person or persons criminally liable for actions committed by another person. Criminal liability is
when a person is commits the crime or act and that he or she intent to commit the crime at that
moment. Sergeant Cotton was acquitted of all criminal charges against him in the criminal side.
However, the Robert and Marian Tolan felt that the lower court's decision was not fair. I do agree
with the Tolans. I believe that courts did not take the evidence that was present to them
inconsideration that Cotton was guilty. Cotton carelessly made an error on typing in the car tag
number that Robert Tolan and his cousin was driving. Since, he made that mistake he is responsible
criminal and civil. He should have been since to prison time and he should be responsible of the
wellbeing of Robert Tolan. On the other hand Cotton was found not criminal liability for the charges
in criminal court but Tolan took his case to the Supreme Court. Cotton then was found responsible in
civil court.
Difference between the various elements of crime including actus reus, mens rea, and concurrence
Mens rea, actus reus, and concurrence are all elements to a crime. These elements must be present to
charge a person with a crime. The guilty mind is known as the mens rea being that a person has the
intent to commit the crime with the mental capacity. The "actus reus" of an

Supreme Court Cases, Thematic Essay
Thematic Essay–Supreme Court Cases The outcome of cases that have gone through the United
States Supreme Court judicial branch have each had a major impact on how the laws and
amendments of the United States Constitution are interpreted. Two cases in particular that
expanded constitutional liberties is the case of Engel vs. Vitale (1962) and the case of Tinker vs.
Des Moines School District (1969). Not only did both of these cases expand constitutional liberties
in general, they more specifically, expanded rights within the school system. In the case of Engel
vs. Vitale, the main topic dealt with prayer at school. The New York State board of regents
composed a non–denominational prayer to be used in the state's public schools....show more content...
In my opinion, this court case gives freedoms to students today when it comes to religious clubs
or decisions to participate in religious activities and allows students to make their own choices to
determine their path in life. In the case of Tinker vs. Des Moines School District, the main topic
dealt with a silent protest at school. During the winter of 1965, students organized a silent protest
against the Vietnam War and wore black armbands to school. The school board learned about a
possibility to this kind of protest a few days earlier and created a policy against antiwar protests.
When the students wore the armbands to school they were going against the policy and were
required to remove them or suspension from school would result. Five students refused and were
sent home. The parents of the students appealed to the United States Supreme Court. As in the first
case discussed, the issue before the court was also based on the first amendment of the Constitution.
The question before the court was; "Do school officials have the right to restrict the free expression
of students without first showing that such expression will disrupt the operation of the school?".
After deliberation, the court overturned the decisions of the lower courts and determined that the
school board's actions violated the first and fourteenth

Supreme Court Case Research Paper
Did you know James Madison was Americas smallest president he was was just 5'4 he was
considered a shy president but he did a lot for this country. he wrote most of the federalists papers
most of the U.S. constitution and all of the bill of rights. Marbury vs Madison was the first
supreme court case to use judicial review. This event is so important because it finalized the ability
of the supreme court to review a law to determine whether or not that law constitutional. If they
didn't review the law to see if it was constitutional or not things would of changed Madison could of
got another term and some laws could of changed. Another reason is that this case is important is
because it showed that the supreme court was more powerful than

Landmark Supreme Court Cases Project Essay
Landmark Supreme Court Cases Project Part I Judicial Activism– When judges deny legislators or
the executive the power to do something unconstitutional. Judicial Restraint– A legal term that
describes a type of judicial interpretation that emphasizes the limited nature of the court's power.
Judicial restraint asks judges to base their judicial decisions solely on the concept of stare decisis.
Precedent– A legal decision or form of proceeding serving as an authoritative rule or pattern in future
similar or analogous cases. Majority opinion– A judicial opinion agreed to by more than half of the
members of a court. A majority opinion sets forth the decision of the court and an explanation of the
rationale behind the court's decision....show more content...
Years later, in 1954, Brown v. Board was brought to light. It challenged the school boards and
their policies on segregation of public schools. When taken to court, the judge ruled in favor of
the school boards. Thwarted, Brown appealed to the Supreme Court with the argument that the
schools systems were unequal. The Supreme Court ruled that is did in fact violate the equal
protection law and Brown won. Brown v. Board is a judicial activism case because the judges
who made the decisions in both Plessy's and Brown's cases to bring their opinion into the matter
and make a decision based of of it. The judges initially had a lower opinion of African Americans
at the time of Plessy v. Ferguson and they felt that the conditions and the fairness of the Jim Crow
laws was right and just. Whereas, later in Brown v. Board the Supreme Court saw now that
Blacks were equal with Whites and deserved to have the same privileges and rights, as any person
should. Brown v. Board had a major impact on the United States of America. It created a place
that truly is free. Where all people are under the protection of the law. Where people of any color
or religion or class can get along and have the same rights as any other person in this country. This
case banished the mindset of "separate but equal" and established the new precedent of "together
and equal and free." That is why Brown v. Board is so

Supreme Court Cases: A Case Study
(B)Evidence of the Handgun and Magazine Should not be Suppressed Because Officer Richardson
Seized the Evidence in Plain View and as a Result of a Protective Sweep
The Supreme Court indicated that entry into a home based on exigent circumstances requires
probable cause to believe that the entry is justified. (People v. Ormonde (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th
282.) Exigent circumstances mean that an emergency requiring swift action to prevent imminent
danger. (Id.) A protective sweep under Maryland v. Blue is a quick and limited search of the
premised incident an arrest and conducted to protect the safety of police officer or others. (Id. (citing
Maryland v. Buie (1990) 494 U.S. 325).) An officer must have a reasonable belief based on specific
on specific

Supreme Court Cases
How Supreme Court decisions sought to assert federal power over state laws(pp. 240–241)
Supreme Court reflected and reinforced nationalism during the post–Ghent years, despite the
ominous setbacks concerning slavery.
Chief Justice John Marshall continued to dominate the high tribunal.
Marshall increased the power of the federal government
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819): Maryland attempted to impose tax on Bank of America to destroy
it. John Marshall denied the right of Maryland with Hamilton's doctrine of implied power
"That the power to tax involves the power to destroy" & "That a power to create implies a power to
preserve."
"Loose construction"
Marshall considered that the Constitution derived from the consent of the people and thus...show
more content...
Woodward (1819)
Dartmouth College was granted a charter by King George III in 1769. (Daniel Webster ('01))
New Hampshire state legislature had seen fit to change it.
Marshall denied the state and stated that the original charter must stand.
The Constitution protected contracts against state encroachments.
Marshall buttressed the federal Union and helped to create a stable, nationally uniform environment
for business and checked the excesses of popularly elected state legislatures.
How Americans debated the scope of government's role in the economy with the acceleration of a
national and international market economy(pp. 232–235)
The spirit of national consciousness was formed after the War of 1812
Washington Irving and James Fenimore Cooper attained international recognition in the 1820s, as
the nation's first writers of importance to use American scenes and themes.
School textbooks were written by Americans instead of British for Americans.
North American Review began publication in 1815 in world magazine.
American painters drew native landscapes.
A revived Bank of the United States was voted by Congress in 1816.
Reconstruction of the capital.
Expansion of the army.
"The American System''
Construction of factories
The path–breaking Tariff of 1816
The first tariff in American history instituted primarily for protection,

Supreme Court Case Essay
1. What is the role of the Supreme Court?
Echoing my forum statement of week 2, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) was
created by, and receives its authority from Article III of the United States (U.S.) Constitution in
1787 and ratified in 1789 [1]. As head of the U.S. Governments judicial branch, the role of SCOTUS
is to enforce the Rule of Law of the U.S. Constitution, seeing that the lower courts do not undermine
the Constitution and the freedoms and liberties it provides to the citizenry; they are the ultimate
arbiters in judicial cases. SCOTUS is comprised of a Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices, who
are all appointed by the President of the United States, but must be confirmed by Congress, and
serve a life term until they choose to retire, resign or are removed due to gross neglect or legal
misconduct. The SCOTUS also acts a check and balance to the President and Congress, ensuring
they do not abuse their authority by exercising their...show more content...
The authority of judicial review by SCOTUS is not actually defined by the U.S. Constitution, but
rather inferred by the Constitution's framework, design and the history of case law heard by
SCOTUS. Judicial Review doctrine was solidified by comprehensive consent across all legal spheres
after the case of Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803) [2]. This case became a landmark verdict,
establishing the definite separation between the branches of government, not just in theory, but in
practical application when SCOTUS ruled an act of Congress unconstitutional [2]. 3. Explain the two
theories of constitutional interpretation, the "living constitution" and "originalist". Which theory do
you believe is the correct theory to

21st Century Supreme Court Cases
The idea of corporate personhood is not a few fangled idea brought on with the start of the 21st
Century. The idea of protecting the rights of people associated with a corporation is far from
new. Supreme Court decisions dating back over 200 years have blurred the lines between
individual rights and the rights of corporations. The more recent cases Burwell v. Hobby Lobby
Stores and Citizens United v. FEC are just a few of the recent case that have ruled in favor of
expanding corporate personhood. However, there have been over fifteen major Supreme Court
decisions that have changed the way corporations are viewed in the eyes of the law. Santa Clara
County v. Southern Pacific Railroad, 1886 was a landmark case questioning if the state of California

Judicial Review: Supreme Court Cases
Judicial Review is one of the court's most important powers and arguably the most powerful one
that this branch or any branch has. This is a power that allows the supreme court to make
legislative and executive actions subject to review and possible invalidation. The power of
Judicial Review was earned in the Supreme Court Case Marbury v. Madison. In this case it was
decided that James Madison's decisions to prevent William Marbury from taking office as justice of
the peace was unconstitutional, this has extended the power and now created what is known as
judicial review. This has continued to affect laws and acts presently such as in the case ofUnited
States v. Nixon when Nixon was denied the powers of absolute executive privilege due to

Essay on Supreme Court Cases
Supreme Court Cases
Engle vs. Vitale
Case: In the late 1950's the New York State Board of Regents wrote and adopted a prayer, which was
supposed to be nondenominational. The board recommended that students in public schools say the
prayer on a voluntary basis every morning. In New Hyde Park Long Island a parent sued the school
claiming that the prayer violated the first amendment of the constitution. The school argued that the
prayer was nondenominational and did not attempt to "establish or endorse" a religion
and thus that it did not violate the establishment clause.
Constitutional issue it relates to: Freedom of Religion
Decision: The court ruled against the school district and upheld the establishment clause of the first
In reversing the District Court's entry of judgment for petitioners, the Court of Appeals held that the
Act applied to forbid discrimination against respondents' proposed club on the basis of its religious
content, and that the Act did not violate the Establishment Clause.
Constitutional issue it relates to: Freedom of Religion
Decision: In 1985, the principal and superintendent of Westside High School (a secondary school in
Omaha, Nebraska) cited the Establishment Clause as a reason for denying the request of Bridget
Mergens to form a Christian club that would have the same privileges and meet on the same terms
and conditions as other Westside student groups, except that it would have no faculty sponsor. Ms.
Mergens took the case to court, and won at first. She lost on appeal at the 8th Circuit Court, and
then later won in a 8–1 decision from the Supreme Court
Johnson vs. U.S.
Case: During the 1984 Republican National Convention in Dallas, Texas, respondent Johnson
participated in a political demonstration to protest the policies of the Reagan administration and
some Dallas–based corporations. After a march through the city streets, Johnson burned an American
flag while

Nine Supreme Court Cases
The Supreme Court is made up of nine justices appointed by the president of the United States.
These justices are are tasked with reviewing and deciding which cases of the 7,000 cases they are
presented with each year. The Supreme Court is given the ability to choose most of the cases they
are presented with each year. (1) The Supreme Court discuss cases presented to them by any of the
court justices and they must utilize the rule of four. These rule states that if at least four of the
justices want to hear a case then all nine of them must listen to a case. (1) Although, there are many
cases that could be seen by the Supreme Court, cases are chosen based upon the far–reaching
implications of the case. The Supreme Court also picks up cases

Three Supreme Court Cases
Fairness deserved To start this off, Fairness is deserved to everyone and people try the bend the
truth of it but fairness needs to be simple everyone treated the same. Many sacrifices were made
that didn't have to be made just for civil rights. There were tons of court cases about civil rights
but these three are very good examples. Civil rights is very important and it was impacted by
three Supreme Court cases: Dred Scott vs Sanford, Brown vs Board of Education, and loving vs
Virginia. So, the first Supreme Court case that'll be talked about is Dred Scott vs Sanford a very
unfair court decision. This court case did not give equal rights to slaves at all. Dred Scott a slave
escaped his owner and fled to a free state, but he was still charged as a slave in a free state. Which
is unfair and he was forced back to his owner denying him of his rights. This should be changed
for this is wrong. Like Martin Luther King once said "faith is taking the first step even when you
don't see the whole staircase." Next, the Supreme Court case about brown vs board of Education.
People of all races deserve equality especially in education. And being separated is still not fair. The
court agreed with this and made a change. Which was another step closer to making equality among
all races. But there...show more content...
Marriage is a right that everyone should have and it shouldn't matter if races marry each other. The
law at first was that inter–racial marriage is banned but then the Supreme Court fixed their wrong
decision and unbanned it. Making another step towards equality because for the next generation
they won't have to deal with this issue. "This Civil Rights Act is a challenge to all of us to go to
work in our communities and our states, in our homes and in our hearts, to eliminate the last vestiges
of injustice in our beloved country." – Lyndon B.

Supreme Court Cases Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Paper Writing Services

More from Paper Writing Services (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Supreme Court Cases Essay