1. CRICOS QLD 00244B | NSW 02225M TEQSA: PRV12081
LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
Innovative Pathways to Inclusion: Turning Policy into
Positive Student Outcomes
Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement Conference
January 2019
Presented by members of the Leadership Research International (LRI) team
University of Southern Queensland, Australia
4. LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
Data collection from:
• Queensland State Education Schools (Australia)
• Primary and Secondary schools
• Principals, teacher leaders, Directors
• Metropolitan to Rural and Remote contexts
• 7 sites and over 40 participants
Research Sites
6. LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
Refractive Phenomenological Data
analysis (Abawi, 2012) was conducted
using the following Filters and Phases:
Filters:
• Research Based Framework
• Organizational Culture
Phases:
• Phase 1: Filter Themes
• Phase 2: Emerging Themes
• Phase 3: Research Questions
Research Approach
Phase 1
Themes related to Organizational
Culture and RBF
Phase 2
Emerging Themes
Phase 3
Answering Research Questions
7. LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
Schein’s Organisational Culture
Culture is the deeper level of basic
assumptions and beliefs that are shared by
members of an organization, that operate
unconsciously and define in a basic 'taken for
granted' fashion an organization's view of its
self and its environment. (p. 6-7)
Schein, E. H. (2010), Organizational Culture and Leadership
Artifacts
Values and
Beliefs
Norms and
Assumptions
9. LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
What are the leadership practices, at all
levels, that contribute to a clear vision
of inclusion and a shared pedagogical
approach to student learning?
Discussant
10. LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
Paper 1: LEADING
How do school leaders
effectively leverage strengths
within the system and their own
school contexts to ensure that
individual student needs are
met?
Cecily Andersen
Dr Cheryl Bauman
Paper 1: LEADING
How do school leaders
effectively leverage strengths
within the system and their own
school contexts to ensure that
individual student needs are
met?
Cecily Andersen
Dr Cheryl Bauman
LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
11. LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
1. Committing to a
Social Justice
Agenda
7. Distributing &
Sustaining Leadership
4. Referencing a clear
Vision for Inclusion
8. Modelling Overt Self-
Reflection & Learning
9. Structuring
Communication
2. Having
Strength of
Character
3. Cultivating a
Moral Imperative
5. Sharing
Language
Expectations
10. Building
Partnerships
6. Embracing Differing
Viewpoints
12. LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
Paper 1: LEADING
How do school leaders
effectively leverage strengths
within the system and their own
school contexts to ensure that
individual student needs are
met?
Cecily Andersen
Dr Cheryl Bauman
Paper 1: LEADING
How do school leaders
effectively leverage strengths
within the system and their own
school contexts to ensure that
individual student needs are
met?
Cecily Andersen
Dr Cheryl Bauman
LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
13. LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
Paper 2: Aligning
What types of school-wide
pedagogical approaches enable
successful inclusion to translate
into high achievement
outcomes?
Tania Leach
“Students experience inclusive
education when they can access and
fully participate in learning, alongside
similar-aged peers, supported by
reasonable adjustments and teaching
strategies tailored to meet their
individual needs.” Inclusion is
embedded in all aspects of school life
and is supported by culture, policies
and every day practices”
(Department of Education, p4 2018)
Leadership
14. LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
“Look this is the culture of the
school. So the number one for me
would be that connection, the way
we work together, that team
approach”
Reflective practice
Formal reflective culture
provides safety to build
capability
• Leadership supports and models
reflective practice
• Self reflection is central to personal
growth
• Collegial culture that is strength based.
• Evidence based reflection
1. Cascade Coaching Model
2. Formal and Structured reflective
conversations
3. Formal Mentoring
15. LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
“So once again it is years of being
able to live your vision and
culture…you get to a point where
change is not about change but
about continuous learning”
Informed Leadership
• Distributive Leadership Model
• Instructional and relational
Leadership Approaches
• Collective accountability for all
student learning
16. LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
Evidence based data practices
“We are inclusive because we are allowing
all students to shine. We feel that we are
offering, targeted support for the needs of
individual students….not just because of
verification or behavior or social emotional
needs"
• Whole school processes are focused on
developing clarity of student learning needs
and successes.
• Shared accountability for all students
learning
• Decisions are based on knowing each
students learning story inside and outside
the classroom
17. LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
Data Informed Decisions
• Identify relevant data and reflect upon range
of evidence collected
• Translate Data to identify student’s next
steps in learning
• Select pedagogies
• Identify short term data tools to ensure
learning has occurred
18. LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
Evidence based pedagogy
“That's what our lessons do, following the Anita
Archer, explicit instruction format…very much
modelling…it has got to be modelled… we are not
going to assume ,especially in our context that
these little ones know what it looks like.”
• Schoolwide Pedagogical Framework
underpinned by School Vision and beliefs
• Assessment capable students
• Learning cycles focused on achieving
student learning goals
19. LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
Evidence based practices
“So one of the process we are using is
the five student questions. We go on a
walk and talk which is the way of
ensuring you've got consistency
happening across your school. You do it
as a clarity thing…”
Impact on Learning
• Whole School Process to look for the
learning line of sight
• Learning Walks and Talks
• 5 Student Questions
• Holistic Student Learning Data
• Teacher reflection
22. LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
Daily work practices
Inclusive
pedagogies
Open ended
view
Dynamic
process
Range of
options
Translation of inclusion policy to daily classroom practice
4: Getting it right from the start
Transitions
prioritised
Home to
school EC centre to
primary
school
Primary
school to
high school
Classroom to
playground
SE Hub to
classroom
Foster care
to family
23. LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
Daily work practices
Explicit
teaching &
modelling
Role plays Modelling
Feedback
Scaffolding
Student
centred
structures
Accessible
Independent
Interesting
There are pictures on cards
throughout the classroom to aid
a child’s independence, literacy
and problem-solving skills. (T1 PS2)
Translation of inclusion policy to daily classroom practice
4: Getting it right from the start
27. LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
All groups and organizations need to know how they are doing against their goals and
periodically need to check to determine whether they are performing in line with their
mission. This process involves three areas in which the group needs to achieve
consensus leading to cultural dimensions that later drop out of awareness and become
basic assumptions. Consensus must be achieved on what to measure, how to measure
it, and what to do when corrections are needed. The cultural elements that form
around each of these issues often become the primary focus for what newcomers to
the organization will be concerned about because such measurements inevitably
become linked to how each employee is doing his or her job. (p. 97)
― Edgar H. Schein, 2010, Organizational Culture and Leadership
How inclusive is your educational context?
28. LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
Principles underpinning Policy into Positive Student
Outcomes
Principle 1 Informed shared social justice leadership at multiple levels – learning from and with others
Principle 2 Moral commitment to a vision of inclusion – explicit expectations regarding inclusion embedded in
school wide practice
Principle 3 Collective commitment to whatever it takes – ensuring that the vision of inclusion is not compromised
Principle 4 Getting it right from the start – wrapping students, families and staff with the support needed to succeed
Principle 5 Professional targeted student-centred learning – professional learning for teachers and support staff
informed by data identified need
Principle 6 Open information and respectful communication – leaders, staff, students, community effectively
working together
(https://www.intechopen.com/books/new-pedagogical-challenges-in-the-21st-century-contributions-of-research-in-education/inclusive-schoolwide-pedagogical-principles-
cultural-indicators-in-action)
30. LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
Strategic Foundations - ?
Community Cohesiveness - ?
Schoolwide Pedagogical
Development and Deepening - ?
Generative Resource Design - ?
Holistic Professional Learning – ?
How is HPL different from
Professional Development?
What are the leadership practices,
at all levels, that contribute to a
clear vision of inclusion and a
shared pedagogical approach to
student learning?
31. CRICOS QLD 00244B | NSW 02225M TEQSA: PRV12081
Leaders creatively harness and leverage the talent and
potential of school staff, system staff, students and community
in order to cater for individual need. The assumption that
underpins school practices is that all students can succeed if
the focus is on enabling learning – no matter what!
32. LEADERSHIP
RESEARCH
INTERNATIONAL
References and Key Publications
Abawi, L. (2012). Introducing refractive phenomenology. International Journal of Multiple Research
Approaches, 6(2)141-149.
Abawi, L. (2013). School meaning systems: The symbiotic nature of culture and 'language-in-use'.
Improving Schools, 16(2), 89-106.
Andrews, D., & Crowther, F. (2003). 3-dimensional pedagogy: The image of 21st century teacher
professionalism. In F. Crowther (Ed.), Australian College of Educators Yearbook, 2003. Teachers as
leaders in a knowledge society (pp. 95-111). Deakin West, Australia: Australian College of Educators.
Bauman, C. (2014). An exploration of the interconnectedness between elementary teacher job
satisfaction, school culture and student achievement: A study in two Canadian elementary schools.
(Doctoral thesis), University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.
Bauman, C. (2015). A refreshing perspective on teacher leadership: How teacher leaders effectively
combine the use of autonomy and collaboration to enhance school improvement. Leading & Managing,
21(2), 46-59.
Crowther, F., Andrews, D., & Conway, J. M. (2013). Schoolwide Pedagogy: Vibrant new meaning for
teachers and principals. Lessons from a successful school system. Moorabbin, Victoria: Hawker
Brownlow Education.
Milne, A. A. (2016). The House at Pooh Corner, Chapter 6. London, UK: Egmont Books.
ISBN10:1405281286
Schein EH. (2004). Organisational Culture and Leadership. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
•ISBN10 1405281286
•ISBN10 1405281286
(Lindy) Speak to each of the domains and explain that the RBF is also the basis of reflective exercise to answer the research question. (Click to next slide)
(Lindy) Our research questions form the basis for this presentation and the discussant. Each paper will be presented to help answer the overall question. We would ask each of you to help answer this from your own perspective using the data and findings presented. An outline of the RBF is on the back of this handout and we ask that you jot down points that appear to fit within each of the Frameworks domains and then to discuss your insights at the end of the presentation. Thank you – I shall now hand over to Cecily and Cheryl.
Department of Education Queensland’s policy statement:
“Students experience inclusive education when they can access and fully participate in learning, alongside similar-aged peers, supported by reasonable adjustments and teaching strategies tailored to meet their individual needs.” Inclusion is embedded in all aspects of school life and is supported by culture, policies and every day practices”
Exploring the principals of collective commitments to whatever it takes and professional targeted student centered learning within sites that reflected the departments policy statement.…the following model emerged.
Should I include this contextual information?
It is also important to note that these schools have long term principals (over 10 years) who have lead the implementation of the following 2 regional wide improvement agendas within their schools:
Development of schoolwide pedagogical framework based on Archer and Hughes Explicit Instruction methodology and
Leading Learning Leadership processes utilising Lyn Sharratt ‘s 14 parameters.
Lived experience quote 2:
“So that’s the model... So we have a lot of reflective professional conversations. We model for our colleagues and we would look and say “Hey what would you change? What did I do well…and through that…this culture…where you can walk into any classroom developed. We are all open to working together and from that comes some really great outcomes.”
Within a reflective culture:
Professional development is holistic and embedded within daily practices rather than confined to a workshop
Acknowledges that we are all life long learners
What this looks like in practice: (reflective practice conversations picture)
Coaching – focused on personal learning is explicitly defined
Leadership team are coached by an external executive coach
Teachers are coached by leadership team who are trained GROWTH coaches:
Formal and structured reflective conversations
Reflective buddies: time provided in staff meetings to reflect and refine practice: what strategies am I using to improve learning? What is working and why? What is not working and how can I change?
Reflective Jigsaw: time provided in professional learning days to reflect and refine whole school priorities and frameworks: what does this look like in my practice and how can I improve?
Common planning time: reflect upon learning journeys of students to inform next learning cycle
Formal mentoring
Staff induction processes: “ there is a formal system where we are taken under the wing for weeks at a time to unpack what we don’t know”
Lived experience quote 2
Distributive leadership
Leadership team consist of formal leadership roles and teacher leaders
Leadership team are lead by a connected principal who walks with staff
Instructional leadership approach
The principal knows every student
All leadership team members are visible in classrooms
Leadership team models practices
Collective accountability
There is a common approach and language used by all the leadership team.
Consistency and collaboration (behavior leader doesn’t mean just look at behavior)
Principal ensures all stakeholders are accountable for their decisions
Purposeful use of data model ensures learning experiences in the classroom reflect learning needs that are connected and reflected in whole school, year level and individual data sources.
Prior to this teachers would make learning and teaching decisions in isolation. Through these process learning is cyclic rather than linear and explicitly continuous.
Whole school data processes:
Common processes to support teachers in making evidence and strength based decisions
Leadership team collaborative data discussions
Whole staff collaborative data discussions (data wall)
Year level or learning need groups (case management meetings)
Enactment of the whole school pedagogical framework ensures:
Strategies are selected to address needs identified in the data
Pedagogy is consistent, modelled and enhanced through pedagogical feedback
There is a common language to talk about teaching and learning
Schoolwide Pedagogical Framework based on authoritative Explicit Instruction Methodology
Every cycle has co constructed learning intentions and success criteria
Student use these to develop learning goals and reflect upon their learning
Underpinned by the gradual release of responsibility teachers model new learning with think alouds
Students metacognition is increased and utilized as evidence of learning
Assessment capable students
Learning Walls
Individual Student Goals
Student Feedback
Teacher Feedback
Clarity of learning intentions
Pedagogical feedback
Learning Line of sight through clear articulation of learning intent and next steps from teachers and students.