2. ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑΤΑ ΛΗΨΕΩΣ ΑΠΟΦΑΣΕΩΝ
Σύστημα
Κλίμακα
Λήψη
α π οφάσεων
Ε π εξ εργασία
π ροτάσεων
Μεταβίβαση
ψήφου
Σχηματισμός
ομάδων
Αξιολόγηση
Προθεσμίες
Gen Assembled
Υπηρεσία
Ναι
Ναι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Ναι
Leading Boards
Υπηρεσία
Όχι
Ναι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Ναι
-
Ναι
ChoiceRanker
Κοινωνική
Ναι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
DemoChoice
Αμφ
Hyperarchy
Κοινωνική
Ναι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Loomio
Κοινωνική
Ναι
Ναι
Όχι
Ναι
Όχι
Ναι
DemocracyLab
Κοινωνική
Ναι
Ναι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Αμφ
CrowdVote
Κοινοτική
Ναι
Όχι
Ναι
Ναι
Όχι
Όχι
Αμφ
Dyn Democracy
Κοινοτική
Ναι
Όχι
Ναι
Όχι
Ναι
Όχι
Όχι
Open Democracy
Κοινοτική
Ναι
Όχι
Ναι
Ναι
Ναι
Όχι
Ναι
Vilfredo
Κοινοτική
Ναι
Ναι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Αμφ
Wisdom of crowds
Κοινοτική
Ναι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Ναι
Όχι
Αμφ
Direct Congress
Ευρεία
Ναι
Ναι
Όχι
Ναι
Ναι
Ναι
Yes/No
Ναι
Votetocracy
Ευρεία
Ναι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Yes/No
Όχι
White House 2
Ευρεία
Όχι!!
Ναι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Priorities
Όχι
Cyb Democracy
Ευρεία
Ναι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Ναι
Yes/No
Όχι
Virtual Parliament
Ευρεία
Ναι
Όχι
Όχι
Ναι
Όχι
Όχι
Like/Dislike
Όχι
Adhocracy
Ευρεία
Ναι
Ναι
Ναι
Ναι
Όχι
Όχι
Schulze
Ναι
Helios Voting
Ευρεία
Ναι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Ναι
Liquid Feedback
Ευρεία
Ναι
Όχι
Ναι
Ναι
Όχι
Όχι
Schulze
Ναι
Open Assembly
Ευρεία
Ναι
Ναι
Όχι
Όχι
Ναι
Όχι
Schulze
Ναι
Virtual Pol
Ευρεία
Ναι
Όχι
Όχι
Ναι
Όχι
Ναι
Yes/No
Ναι
Votorola
Ευρεία
Ναι
Ναι
Ναι
Ναι
Ναι
Όχι
Democracy 2.0
Ευρεία
Ναι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
Όχι
[1] http://www.metagovernment.org/wiki/Active_projects
[2] http://www.metagovernment.org/wiki/Related_projects
[3] http://www.metagovernment.org/wiki/Standardization
Αλγόριθμος
Χρήση
Αμφ
Αμφ
Like/Dislike
Ναι
Ναι
Μελετη
Yea/No
Αναπτ
2
3. ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑΤΑ ΛΗΨΕΩΣ ΑΠΟΦΑΣΕΩΝ
-Votorola is a technology for the broadbased guidance of societal systems.
-We explore techniques that enable people
to orient their discussions toward mutual
understanding and consensus;
-to independently compose primary
legislative bills, plans and other draft
norms in critical opposition to authority;
-to guide the decisions of authority;
- and together to steer society as a whole.
http://zelea.com/project/votorola/home.html
3
4. ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑΤΑ ΛΗΨΕΩΣ ΑΠΟΦΑΣΕΩΝ
- The voting mechanism is a delegate cascade that is open to continuous
recasting.
- Votes are public. There are no secret ballots. The identities of all voters are
revealed. Anyone may trace the flow of their votes through the cascade, and
thence to the terminal candidates who hold them.
4
6. ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑΤΑ ΛΗΨΕΩΣ ΑΠΟΦΑΣΕΩΝ
- Assent for each candidate is measured by the quantity of votes received. A
candidate holding votes is known as a base candidate.
- Assent is the expression of agreement.
- The typical form of a cascade is a tree, that has a single base candidate at the root
(root candidate), voters at the leaves (top), and delegates among the branches in
between.
6
8. ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑΤΑ ΛΗΨΕΩΣ ΑΠΟΦΑΣΕΩΝ
Textbender is a system of collaborative writing based on recombinant text. It
implements a social Web medium with potential applications ranging from open art
to open democracy. The underlying mechanism is evolutionary genetics:
- The text exists as a population of variants, one per author.
- Authors swap fragments and arrangements of the text, peer to peer.
- Genes encode a traceable record of authorship throughout.
8
9. ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑΤΑ ΛΗΨΕΩΣ ΑΠΟΦΑΣΕΩΝ
Τhe system remembers the authorship of each contribution, no matter how small, wherever it happens to survive in an
individual document. A document is a patchwork of discrete genes, each of which encodes a piece of text. In addition, each
gene records its own origins and ancestry. The combined ancestries of all genes of a document are, therefore, a record of
that document's authorship. When a piece of text is transferred to another document, a portion of authorship is transferred
too. When that document is later subject to a genealogical trace, it will reveal the contributions made to it by all surviving
pieces of text, and the historical authorship of each.
9
16. ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑΤΑ ΛΗΨΕΩΣ ΑΠΟΦΑΣΕΩΝ
The architecture takes seriously the ideal of heroic outside guidance. It aims to situate
the hero guide beyond the formalized guideway and within the context of the
lifeworld as is. An ordinary person speaks from that everyday context and the course
of society is changed.
On the system side, the aim is to guide the whole of the state administrative system as
is. The architecture provides for this purpose a comprehensive catalogue of guidance
practices that requires no initiative or structural change on the part the state, because
the institution of the guideways is independently anchored in the lifeworld.
16