SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 12
A.1. Steak Sauce: Lawry’s Defense
MKM805 – Strategic Marketing Management
To- Duncan Reith
From- Kush Rathod
Student ID -102108172
Email ID- Krathod2@MySeneca.ca
Date - 28Th March 2018
1
What measures should A.1. Steak Sauce take to increase dollar market share in long run while competing from
new entrant in category and maintain 20% of sales during promotional weeks ?
Challenges Assessment
A.1. Steak Sauce A.1. Steak Sauce faces challenge to increase consumption
of steak sauce per occasion
This problem can’t be dealt with on immediate basis
Competitors A.1. steak sauce doesn’t face any threat from existing
competitors as A.1. has been successful to establish itself
over years
Existing competitors are minimal threat to business as Heinz 57
is not a direct competitor and Private label products have
market share less than 20%
Promotions Promotional weeks is the time when A.1. spends most
revenue on its marketing and bears loss of reducing prices
during this weeks
Promotions are necessary to increase its sale in market and
maintain it’s brand awareness during promotional week. It can
not be changed and has to bear loss
Channels Retailers have power to dictate their margins.
Margins are same during the promotional week and
manufacturer covered cost for price reduction.
Manufacturers need to secure their position in flyers during
the promotional week as retailers tend to only have one
product per category
Channel margins cannot be negotiated and has highest shelf
facing which is in company’s interest to face to any new
competition
Lawry Lawry is a brand of Unilever which gives them strong recall
in the minds of consumers
Lawry is going to spend 20 million dollars for its advertising
while coming up with 2 for 5$ promotional offer to enter
into steak sauce market
Lawry’s Live is one the initiative to attract consumers and it
can lead to help them gain market share
Lawry’s launch will affect market share of A.1. steak sauce due
to Unilever’s strong brand presence.
Promotions offered by Lawry has potential to capture new
customers and needs to be looked after to sustain in market.
Consumers Consumers are highly brand conscious and they are more
likely to buy from premium brands during an occasion.
Lawry’s advertising and promotional efforts can change
behavior of an consumer to buy new product at cheaper
price
Consumers can be affected by heavy advertising and result into
trial purchase among consumers
Consumers may not change it’s brand preference but there are
high chances they might try Lawry’s steak sauce through Lawry’s
Live
2
A.1. Steak Sauce has a strong brand presence in market with minimum competition, it faces an immediate risk
from Lawry’s Steak who is set to launch on April 1 with its promotional offer of 2 for 5$ on memorial day
A.1 .Steak Sauce
• A.1. is the longest and well established player
in the steak sauce market with dollar share
more than 50%
• It has a high consumer value in steak sauce
market compared to other brands
• Expansion of A.1. failed while launching
“Poultry sauce
Competitors
• There was limited competition in steak sauce
market
• Heinz 57 was largest brand competitor in
market
• Private Label were sold at 3.49$ in retail stores
but were least famous in steak sauce category
• Lawry is one of the upcoming competitor with
an leading market share in Marinades
category
Channels
• Retailers had strong channel power with
commission of 30% for all items in category
• 9/10 steak houses served A.1. Steak sauce
which created high brand awareness among
consumers
• A.1.Steak sauce is available in all grocery
store, mass merchandisers stores and club
stores
• Retailers earn 123 million$ from all its brand
Consumers
• Volume sales has been flat in recent years
• Steak sauce was consumed in a lesser
quantity per occasion
• Consumers tend to buy more during holidays
like memorial day and fourth of July
• There is strong loyalty in steak sauce market
Lawry
• Lawry is owned by Unilever which has a
strong position in Marinades and seasoning
industry
• Lawry’s Marinades category is growing 15%
annually
• Considerably low pricing of Lawry’s steak
sauce compared to A.1. Steak sauce at 3.99$
• Lawry’s steak sauce is spending 20 million $
and dropped 5 FSI focusing on May, June and
July
Promotions
• 20% of A.1. steak sauce revenue come during
promotional week
• A.1. steak sauce had promotional price of
4.49$
• A.1. steak sauce uses 10% of revenue in in-
store promotion
• There is strong loyalty in steak sauce market
• FSI of 1 million dollar are dropped in each
quarter by A.1. Steak Sauce
A.1.has advantage of first mover in the market
thereby having power to dominate price in
market as it also matches perceived value of
consumers
Over years there are no new competitors in
industry as the growth of units and volume is
stagnant irrespective of price
Promotional week are most important as steak
sauce is an occasional product and it is the best
time to grab attention of consumers
Retailers have strong influence on brands as
their margins are hardly negotiable and only
support one product per category during
promotional week
Consumers can only be attracted during point of
purchase as it is more of an impulsive behavior
and prices of product are not much affected on
their purchasing decision as it’s occasional
product
Lawry being of the successful brand in
Marinade; it is trying to capture market and risk
entering steak sauce as it has financial power
3
Retailers play important role to steak sauce business and A.1. plays important part in retailers business
4
-Retailers earn $62,997,424
from A.1.Steak sauce overall
-A.1.Steak Sauce has highest
shelf spacing of 6 and
overall 14
-Retailers margin is as high
as 30% which remains to be
same during promotional
week
-Manufacturers are tend to
sponsor in-store promotions
during promotional week
-11.5 million $ is earned only
through one product during
2 weeks which shows high
demand of A.1. Steak sauce
among consumers
A.1. Steak Sauce has high perceived value compared to Lawry’s Steak Sauce due to it’s well established brand
image and can offer 3 pricing to compete with Lawry’s Steak Sauce during its promotional week
Perceived value by consumer based on
everyday pricing
Quality
Price
Brands Prices per Piece
A.1. Steak Sauce 4.99$
Heinz 57 4.79$
Private Label 3.49$
Lawry’s Steak Sauce 3.99$
A.1.Steak Sauce
Heinz 57
Lawry’s Steak
Sauce
Private Label
Products
Brands Prices
A.1. Steak Sauce 4.49$
A.1. Steak Sauce 4.00$
A.1. Steak Sauce 2 piece for 5$
Lawry’s Steak Sauce 2 pieces for 5$
Perceived value by consumer
based on promotional pricing after
launch of Lawry
Price
Quality
A.1. Steak Sauce’s
4.49$
A.1. Steak Sauce’s
4.00$
Lawry’s 2 for 5$
A.1.Steak Sauce’s
2 for 5$
A.1. Steak Sauce has 3 possible
pricing option to compete with
Lawry’s promotional price in
grocery stores
• A.1. Steak Sauce can sell it’s
product for 2 for 5$ which will
attract consumers who are
looking to buy more and might
change perception of quality of
its product
• A.1. Steak Sauce can sell it’s
product for 4.00$ and give
consumers a product which is
well established at all time low
price with highest perceived
quality in market
• A.1. Steak Sauce can sell it’s
product at it’s original
promotional price of 4.49$,
which will not hamper brand
reputation among consumers
thereby not changing it’s
perceived value
A.1. Steak Sauce has highest perceived quality of steak sauce among all of
its competitors in market 5
Possible alternative options affects retailers profit as 20% number of steak sauce is sold in 2 promotional weeks
Customer wants and needs Customers are more likely to buy products during
weeks of Memorial day and 4th of July
Customers are willing to pay price but are looking for
products which tastes good and can’t ruin their day
by having imperfect meal
Customers consume steak sauce in less quantity as
low as one tablespoon per serving
Companies like Heinz 57 distinguish themselves by its
taste and appearance
Channel Capabilities and cost A.1. steak sauce is available in most of the groceries ,
mass merchandisers and club stores
Retailers have a margin of 30% which is to be
changed rarely
Channel power and influence Retailers only run one promotion per product per
category during promotional week
Retailers margin doesn’t change during promotional
week
Competitive postures and actions A.1. has most amount of shelf spacing compared to
other brands
A.1. has been market leader and there are no new
entrants in market
Forces affecting channel 11.5 million $ is earned in promotional week by
retailers by selling A.1. Steak Sauce at 4.49$
Alternatives Effects on Retailers
A.1. Steak Sauce 2 for 5$ Retailers tend to make earnings of
6.4 million $ which is a huge loss
of 5.1 million dollars compared to
its original promotional price
As Steak sauce is consumed in
less quantity it is more likely
people are looking to buy one
product irrespective of price
which completely fails motive of
promotional price
A.1. Steak Sauce 1 for 4$ Retailers earn around 10
million$ which has a bearable
loss of 1 million$ compared to
its original promotional price.
Selling it for 4$ taps into the
wants of consumers which
might increase sales
A.1. Steak Sauce selling at
original promotional price of
4.49$ for 1 piece
A.1. Steak sauce selling at
original promotional price
might affect its market share
due to new entry from Lawry
Retailers play important role during promotional week as they have power to
support one brand and consumers tend to buy more through retailers during this
weeks
6
Price Sensitivity helps us to evaluate buying behavior of consumer during promotional week and their motive
towards buying steak sauce
Consumer economics • Steak Sauce bought during all year round is tend to be
used by consumer itself , on other hand , Steak sauce
bought during holiday weeks are tend to be used
during feasts and social gatherings
• Higher price doesn’t necessarily indicate higher
quality but the quality of brand plays an important
role while buying this product as customers are
looking for good experience of meal during holidays
and won’t think much about prices during this period
• Price of the steak sauce is minimal compared to the
earnings of a consumer and can be afforded by
consumers
Customer Search and Usage • Buyers doesn’t have to pay much while switching
brands
• Consumers can easily compare prices with other
competitors as most the products are available in
same location
• Consumers can taste other steak sauces only after
buying them. Lawry’s Live can be possible factor to
attract consumers by trying them taste the product
• Time of purchase play vital role as consumers tend to
buy products during holidays of memorial day and 4th
of July
Competition • Steak sauce offering by Heinz 57 is considered to be
different in taste and appearance compared to others
• Product testing showed us that Lawry’s product isn’t
good as compared to A.1. original
• A.1. Steak Sauce matches value as perceived by the
consumers
• A.1. is one of the long established brand which brings
trust among consumers
• Lawry’ Steak sauce can leverage it’s brand image as it is
globally known for many of its product
Alternatives Price sensitivity affecting
during promotional week
A.1. Steak Sauce 2 for 5$ Price is not an important
consideration during
holiday period as they are
looking for taste and
reliable brand
2for 5S might dilute quality
of product
A.1. Steak Sauce 1 for 4$ 4$ for 1 during promotional
week can attract consumers
while maintaining the
perception of quality of
product and has less impact
on brand equity in long run
A.1. Steak Sauce selling at
original promotional price
of 4.49$ for 1 piece
Stable prices over years
during promotion doesn’t
hamper brand equity and
this deal is less attractive
than 4 $ as people are
looking to spend less while
getting higher quality of
product
7
Consumers are not price conscious but
looking for quality of products
A.1. Steak Sauce can sell 2 pieces for $5 during promotional week and price match with its competition Lawry’s
steak sauce
Evaluating Criteria Assessment
Consumer’s purchasing behavior Consumer tend to buy same amount product as their
consumption per occasion is less
Effect on competitor It might help us to gain more market share dollars by
competing at price of private labels
Long term effect This might destroy our brand equity in market
thereby giving Lawry a chance to capture market by
leveraging it’s parent brand
Short term effect This will help A.1. Steak sauce increase market share
while taking a hit in operating revenue
Effects on channel Retailers may demand higher margin due loss of 5.1
million dollars
Brand Perception In long run it brand perception might be hampered
regarding quality of product
Change in Operating Revenue A.1. Steak sauce has to make additional promotional
cost of 12 million dollar to compete with Lawry’s
promotion activities
Insights
• Discounting products will not
lead to more consumption as
required quantity is low per
serving
• A.1. Steak Sauce is considered a
good quality of brand which is
generally perceived as high
prices but due to this pricing it
can be perceived as a brand
having reduced brand quality
• 12 million dollar loss will only
help to tackle competition in
short run while hampering
brand’s overall image
• This move indicates that we are
the follower of price according
to competition which will
tarnish brand image which are
established over long time
8
A.1. Steak Sauce can continue its original promotional strategy by selling one piece for $4.49 during promotional
week and not be bothered by new entrant in the market because of it’s brand equity
Evaluating Criteria Assessment
Consumer’s purchasing behavior Consumer tend to opt for same brand as they tend to be
highly brand loyal and same prices increases brand recall
about the product
Effect on competitor A.1. Steak Sauce might lose dollar share to Lawry’s Steak
sauce due to its derived brand value and high promotion
which might just motivate consumers to try new
products
Long term effect Selling at original promotional price helps to withstand
its brand equity in long run
Short term effect A.1. Steak sauce has a loss of 2.5% market share which
gives them a loss of 4.3 million dollars
Effects on channel Retailers earn most revenue in all 3 possible scenarios of
11.5 million dollars.
Brand Perception Brand perception will remain same and will be stagnant
due to its long presence in market with no sudden price
changes
Change in Operating Revenue Operating revenue drops to 55.6 million dollars due to
Lawry Steak sauce’s entry in market
Insights
• A.1. Steak sauce is well
established and long
established brand which gives
them first movers advantage of
being judged upon
• Over years A.1.steak sauce has
created brand image with its
unique taste which gives them
satisfaction during special
occasions
• A.1. Steak sauce is considered
to be good quality brand
compared to any Lawry’s steak
sauce
• A.1. Steak Sauce provides good
amount of earnings to channel
through its business which
gives us some power to
leverage channel
9
A.1. Steak Sauce can sell one for 4$ while maintaining its brand equity for longer term while minimizing it’s losses
in short term
Evaluating Criteria Assessment
Consumer’s purchasing behavior Selling at 4$ will have no effect on its brand value
while attracting consumers to buy product with
highest quality at least cost available
Effect on competitor Selling at 4$ will nullify effect of the trade promotions
by Lawry’s steak sauce and might be able to capture
market share from other competitors
Long term effect Selling at 4$ will have to protect its market share in
long term while maintaining its brand equity
Short term effect Selling at 4$ will create tough competition to capture
market share during its promotional week.
Effects on channel Channels has to bear minimum loss of 1 million dollars
compared to alternative of 2 for 5$ which is
negotiable due to its relation with retailer over years
Brand Perception Brand perception will remain same as it can be
considered as one of the possible perceived price to
sell high quality of product
Change in Operating Revenue A.1. Steak Sauce has to bear loss of 3 million dollars
which help to compete and survive in market
Insights
• Selling one bottle for 4$ will
help to achieve its long term
and short term goal while
giving a signal to new entrant in
market
• As there are no new
competitors in market and with
perception of high price for
high quality is being developed
in minds of consumers over
year.
• Selling one bottle for 4$ will be
considered as one of the brand
which is willing to give cheaper
price for high quality products
• Due to high loyalty in steak
sauce category consumers are
less likely to change their brand
10
4.49$ - Original promotional price
• Not changing price during promotional week
effects its volume market share with a decline of
2.5%
• Due to loss of market share A.1. Steak Units sold
has to face drop of 466,772 units
• A.1. face loss of 4.3 million dollars while taking no
action against its brand competitor
2 for 5$
• Price matching with competitor will lead to
increase in promotion efforts by 12 million $
• Increase in promotional efforts leads to loss in
operating revenue
• Decrease in consumers cuts affects channel
behavior in longer run
Selling one for 4$
• Promotional cost has to be increase by 2% to
match Lawry’s competition.
• A.1. has to bear loss of 3 million dollars
compared to 2002
• With decent cut of 1.2$ per unit retailers are to
be satisfied by A.1.’s offering
Financial analysis of each possible options helps us to understand loss of company and if it is investing it’s money in precise channel to
select an alternative
11
In worst case scenario A.1. steak sauce can loose market share
of 10% but due to its high brand presence it is difficult to loose
its to entire share to one category. Therefore, 10% is divided
among A.1., Heinz 57 , Private label and other products
A.1. Steak Sauce should price itself at 4$ per bottle during promotional week while Lawry is trying to target it’s
consumer at 2 for 5$
• By selling at price of 4$ per bottle A.1. Steak sauce can achieve it’s objective of tackling threat from Lawry’s pricing during
promotional week and maintain it’s brand value in long term
• Selling at 4$ per bottle will give them loss of 3 million $ which can be covered in future years
• Consumers are looking for high quality products and by maintaining reputation of being premium, it will help us to target consumers
• Retailers are being one of the channels having power, during the promotional week of 4$ for 1 they earn 10 million dollars 1 million
less than usual.
• Price doesn’t play important role in purchase decision of Steak sauce during promotional week on other hand quality matters which
is offered by A.1. Steak sauce
12
Fulfilling needs of consumers, providing good percent of margin and offering better perceived value than Lawry’s
Steak sauce during promotion puts us in win win win situation
• As Lawry is being launched on first week of April , A.1. can only play on its pricing tactics which leaves out of option to put
Lawry
• Lawry’s sole motivation is to enter market as it is doing good in marinades line which gives them some room enter other
category
• A.1. being of one well established brand created high brand loyalty among consumers over years which has created
perceived perfect blend taste and quality of sauce in the eyes of consumers

More Related Content

What's hot

Case Analysis:Colgate-PalmolivePrecision Toothbrush
Case Analysis:Colgate-PalmolivePrecision ToothbrushCase Analysis:Colgate-PalmolivePrecision Toothbrush
Case Analysis:Colgate-PalmolivePrecision ToothbrushVivek Kumar Gupta
 
Colgate case study- Harvard Business Review
Colgate case study- Harvard Business ReviewColgate case study- Harvard Business Review
Colgate case study- Harvard Business ReviewHarish kumar
 
Colgate Palmolive - Harvard Business School case
Colgate Palmolive - Harvard Business School caseColgate Palmolive - Harvard Business School case
Colgate Palmolive - Harvard Business School caseNaveen Yakkundi
 
Brannigan Foods | Harvard Case
Brannigan Foods | Harvard CaseBrannigan Foods | Harvard Case
Brannigan Foods | Harvard CaseRohan Bharaj
 
Colgate Precision - Harvard Business Case Analysis
Colgate Precision - Harvard Business Case AnalysisColgate Precision - Harvard Business Case Analysis
Colgate Precision - Harvard Business Case AnalysisUsha Vijay
 
Jones Blair case brief
Jones Blair case briefJones Blair case brief
Jones Blair case briefrodeo123
 
Optical Distortion, Inc
Optical Distortion, IncOptical Distortion, Inc
Optical Distortion, Inculugbek55
 
Colgate Palmolive: The Precision Toothbrush
Colgate Palmolive: The Precision ToothbrushColgate Palmolive: The Precision Toothbrush
Colgate Palmolive: The Precision ToothbrushSAIKAT DAS
 
Colgate-Palmolive Company: The Precision Toothbrush Case Study
Colgate-Palmolive Company: The Precision Toothbrush Case StudyColgate-Palmolive Company: The Precision Toothbrush Case Study
Colgate-Palmolive Company: The Precision Toothbrush Case StudyUttaravalli Abhinav
 
Unilever Brazil Case
Unilever Brazil CaseUnilever Brazil Case
Unilever Brazil CasePrakhar Jain
 
Exploring Brand-Person Relationships-Three Life histories
Exploring Brand-Person  Relationships-Three Life historiesExploring Brand-Person  Relationships-Three Life histories
Exploring Brand-Person Relationships-Three Life historiesAmrita Sarkhel
 
Colgate Palmolive - The Precision Toothbrush - Case Study Analysis
Colgate Palmolive - The Precision Toothbrush - Case Study AnalysisColgate Palmolive - The Precision Toothbrush - Case Study Analysis
Colgate Palmolive - The Precision Toothbrush - Case Study AnalysisSharanya Ray
 
Aqualisa quartz - Case study
Aqualisa quartz - Case studyAqualisa quartz - Case study
Aqualisa quartz - Case studyRaoul Gauthier
 
Optical Distortion Marketing Plan
Optical Distortion Marketing PlanOptical Distortion Marketing Plan
Optical Distortion Marketing PlanSrinivasan Raghavan
 
Aqualisa Quartz: Simply a Better Shower
Aqualisa Quartz: Simply a Better ShowerAqualisa Quartz: Simply a Better Shower
Aqualisa Quartz: Simply a Better ShowerAkshay Hiremath
 
"Culinarian Cookware" case study analysis
"Culinarian Cookware" case study analysis"Culinarian Cookware" case study analysis
"Culinarian Cookware" case study analysisSindoor Naik
 
Launching krispy natural case study analysis
Launching krispy natural case study analysisLaunching krispy natural case study analysis
Launching krispy natural case study analysisAbhishek Pathak
 
NATUREVIEW FARM CASE STUDY
NATUREVIEW  FARM CASE STUDYNATUREVIEW  FARM CASE STUDY
NATUREVIEW FARM CASE STUDYRaghav Thapar
 

What's hot (20)

Case Analysis:Colgate-PalmolivePrecision Toothbrush
Case Analysis:Colgate-PalmolivePrecision ToothbrushCase Analysis:Colgate-PalmolivePrecision Toothbrush
Case Analysis:Colgate-PalmolivePrecision Toothbrush
 
Truearth
TruearthTruearth
Truearth
 
Colgate case study- Harvard Business Review
Colgate case study- Harvard Business ReviewColgate case study- Harvard Business Review
Colgate case study- Harvard Business Review
 
Colgate Palmolive - Harvard Business School case
Colgate Palmolive - Harvard Business School caseColgate Palmolive - Harvard Business School case
Colgate Palmolive - Harvard Business School case
 
Brannigan Foods | Harvard Case
Brannigan Foods | Harvard CaseBrannigan Foods | Harvard Case
Brannigan Foods | Harvard Case
 
Colgate Precision - Harvard Business Case Analysis
Colgate Precision - Harvard Business Case AnalysisColgate Precision - Harvard Business Case Analysis
Colgate Precision - Harvard Business Case Analysis
 
Jones Blair case brief
Jones Blair case briefJones Blair case brief
Jones Blair case brief
 
Optical Distortion, Inc
Optical Distortion, IncOptical Distortion, Inc
Optical Distortion, Inc
 
Colgate Palmolive: The Precision Toothbrush
Colgate Palmolive: The Precision ToothbrushColgate Palmolive: The Precision Toothbrush
Colgate Palmolive: The Precision Toothbrush
 
Colgate-Palmolive Company: The Precision Toothbrush Case Study
Colgate-Palmolive Company: The Precision Toothbrush Case StudyColgate-Palmolive Company: The Precision Toothbrush Case Study
Colgate-Palmolive Company: The Precision Toothbrush Case Study
 
Unilever Brazil Case
Unilever Brazil CaseUnilever Brazil Case
Unilever Brazil Case
 
Exploring Brand-Person Relationships-Three Life histories
Exploring Brand-Person  Relationships-Three Life historiesExploring Brand-Person  Relationships-Three Life histories
Exploring Brand-Person Relationships-Three Life histories
 
Colgate Palmolive - The Precision Toothbrush - Case Study Analysis
Colgate Palmolive - The Precision Toothbrush - Case Study AnalysisColgate Palmolive - The Precision Toothbrush - Case Study Analysis
Colgate Palmolive - The Precision Toothbrush - Case Study Analysis
 
Aqualisa quartz - Case study
Aqualisa quartz - Case studyAqualisa quartz - Case study
Aqualisa quartz - Case study
 
Optical Distortion Marketing Plan
Optical Distortion Marketing PlanOptical Distortion Marketing Plan
Optical Distortion Marketing Plan
 
Aqualisa Quartz: Simply a Better Shower
Aqualisa Quartz: Simply a Better ShowerAqualisa Quartz: Simply a Better Shower
Aqualisa Quartz: Simply a Better Shower
 
"Culinarian Cookware" case study analysis
"Culinarian Cookware" case study analysis"Culinarian Cookware" case study analysis
"Culinarian Cookware" case study analysis
 
Launching krispy natural case study analysis
Launching krispy natural case study analysisLaunching krispy natural case study analysis
Launching krispy natural case study analysis
 
Mountain dew
Mountain dewMountain dew
Mountain dew
 
NATUREVIEW FARM CASE STUDY
NATUREVIEW  FARM CASE STUDYNATUREVIEW  FARM CASE STUDY
NATUREVIEW FARM CASE STUDY
 

Similar to 2018 03 28 kush rathod a.1.steak sauce

Natureview farm: Case Analysis
Natureview farm: Case AnalysisNatureview farm: Case Analysis
Natureview farm: Case AnalysisShayantan Roy
 
Natureview Farm - Harvard Case Study
Natureview Farm - Harvard Case StudyNatureview Farm - Harvard Case Study
Natureview Farm - Harvard Case StudySanthosh Kumar
 
Natureview Farm - HBR Case Study
Natureview Farm - HBR Case StudyNatureview Farm - HBR Case Study
Natureview Farm - HBR Case StudyTejus Vamshi
 
Launching krispy natural case study.
Launching krispy natural case study.Launching krispy natural case study.
Launching krispy natural case study.Saksham Gupta
 
Launching Krispy Natural : A Case Study
Launching Krispy Natural : A Case StudyLaunching Krispy Natural : A Case Study
Launching Krispy Natural : A Case StudyZain Rizwan
 
Harvard business review:Natureview Farm
Harvard business review:Natureview FarmHarvard business review:Natureview Farm
Harvard business review:Natureview FarmSukkhadaJoshii
 
A Harvard Business School Case Study- Launching Krispy Natural: Cracking the ...
A Harvard Business School Case Study- Launching Krispy Natural: Cracking the ...A Harvard Business School Case Study- Launching Krispy Natural: Cracking the ...
A Harvard Business School Case Study- Launching Krispy Natural: Cracking the ...Sumedha Uppal
 
Launching Krispy Natural: Cracking the Product Management Code
Launching Krispy Natural: Cracking the Product Management CodeLaunching Krispy Natural: Cracking the Product Management Code
Launching Krispy Natural: Cracking the Product Management CodeDhwani Kothari
 
Krispy Natural: A Case Study
Krispy Natural: A Case StudyKrispy Natural: A Case Study
Krispy Natural: A Case StudySatyartha Saxena
 
Launchingkrispynatural
LaunchingkrispynaturalLaunchingkrispynatural
LaunchingkrispynaturalAkshay Agrawal
 
Quality Promise Program: Empowering Consumers As Your Quality-Control Agents
Quality Promise Program:  Empowering Consumers As Your Quality-Control AgentsQuality Promise Program:  Empowering Consumers As Your Quality-Control Agents
Quality Promise Program: Empowering Consumers As Your Quality-Control AgentsFeliciaRogers
 

Similar to 2018 03 28 kush rathod a.1.steak sauce (20)

Kayem foods, inc. buzz marketing
Kayem foods, inc. buzz marketingKayem foods, inc. buzz marketing
Kayem foods, inc. buzz marketing
 
Private label
Private labelPrivate label
Private label
 
NON veg pickels
NON veg pickelsNON veg pickels
NON veg pickels
 
NATUREVIEW CASE STUDY
NATUREVIEW CASE STUDYNATUREVIEW CASE STUDY
NATUREVIEW CASE STUDY
 
Natureview
NatureviewNatureview
Natureview
 
Natureview farm: Case Analysis
Natureview farm: Case AnalysisNatureview farm: Case Analysis
Natureview farm: Case Analysis
 
Natureview Farm - Harvard Case Study
Natureview Farm - Harvard Case StudyNatureview Farm - Harvard Case Study
Natureview Farm - Harvard Case Study
 
Natureview Farm - HBR Case Study
Natureview Farm - HBR Case StudyNatureview Farm - HBR Case Study
Natureview Farm - HBR Case Study
 
Launching krispy natural case study.
Launching krispy natural case study.Launching krispy natural case study.
Launching krispy natural case study.
 
Krispies
KrispiesKrispies
Krispies
 
Launching Krispy Natural : A Case Study
Launching Krispy Natural : A Case StudyLaunching Krispy Natural : A Case Study
Launching Krispy Natural : A Case Study
 
Harvard business review:Natureview Farm
Harvard business review:Natureview FarmHarvard business review:Natureview Farm
Harvard business review:Natureview Farm
 
Natureview farm
Natureview farmNatureview farm
Natureview farm
 
A Harvard Business School Case Study- Launching Krispy Natural: Cracking the ...
A Harvard Business School Case Study- Launching Krispy Natural: Cracking the ...A Harvard Business School Case Study- Launching Krispy Natural: Cracking the ...
A Harvard Business School Case Study- Launching Krispy Natural: Cracking the ...
 
Launching Krispy Natural: Cracking the Product Management Code
Launching Krispy Natural: Cracking the Product Management CodeLaunching Krispy Natural: Cracking the Product Management Code
Launching Krispy Natural: Cracking the Product Management Code
 
Krispy Natural: A Case Study
Krispy Natural: A Case StudyKrispy Natural: A Case Study
Krispy Natural: A Case Study
 
Nature view
Nature viewNature view
Nature view
 
Nature view
Nature viewNature view
Nature view
 
Launchingkrispynatural
LaunchingkrispynaturalLaunchingkrispynatural
Launchingkrispynatural
 
Quality Promise Program: Empowering Consumers As Your Quality-Control Agents
Quality Promise Program:  Empowering Consumers As Your Quality-Control AgentsQuality Promise Program:  Empowering Consumers As Your Quality-Control Agents
Quality Promise Program: Empowering Consumers As Your Quality-Control Agents
 

Recently uploaded

Tech Startup Growth Hacking 101 - Basics on Growth Marketing
Tech Startup Growth Hacking 101  - Basics on Growth MarketingTech Startup Growth Hacking 101  - Basics on Growth Marketing
Tech Startup Growth Hacking 101 - Basics on Growth MarketingShawn Pang
 
VIP Call Girl Jamshedpur Aashi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Jamshedpur
VIP Call Girl Jamshedpur Aashi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service JamshedpurVIP Call Girl Jamshedpur Aashi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Jamshedpur
VIP Call Girl Jamshedpur Aashi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service JamshedpurSuhani Kapoor
 
Pitch Deck Teardown: NOQX's $200k Pre-seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: NOQX's $200k Pre-seed deckPitch Deck Teardown: NOQX's $200k Pre-seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: NOQX's $200k Pre-seed deckHajeJanKamps
 
Call Girls Miyapur 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Miyapur 7001305949 all area service COD available Any TimeCall Girls Miyapur 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Miyapur 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Timedelhimodelshub1
 
Call Girls in Gomti Nagar - 7388211116 - With room Service
Call Girls in Gomti Nagar - 7388211116  - With room ServiceCall Girls in Gomti Nagar - 7388211116  - With room Service
Call Girls in Gomti Nagar - 7388211116 - With room Servicediscovermytutordmt
 
Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...
Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...
Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...lizamodels9
 
Call Girls Pune Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Pune Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Pune Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Pune Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableDipal Arora
 
Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...
Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...
Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...lizamodels9
 
7.pdf This presentation captures many uses and the significance of the number...
7.pdf This presentation captures many uses and the significance of the number...7.pdf This presentation captures many uses and the significance of the number...
7.pdf This presentation captures many uses and the significance of the number...Paul Menig
 
/:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In...
/:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In.../:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In...
/:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In...lizamodels9
 
Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...Dipal Arora
 
GD Birla and his contribution in management
GD Birla and his contribution in managementGD Birla and his contribution in management
GD Birla and his contribution in managementchhavia330
 
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSMMonte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSMRavindra Nath Shukla
 
Grateful 7 speech thanking everyone that has helped.pdf
Grateful 7 speech thanking everyone that has helped.pdfGrateful 7 speech thanking everyone that has helped.pdf
Grateful 7 speech thanking everyone that has helped.pdfPaul Menig
 
BEST Call Girls In Greater Noida ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
BEST Call Girls In Greater Noida ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,BEST Call Girls In Greater Noida ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
BEST Call Girls In Greater Noida ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,noida100girls
 
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,noida100girls
 
RE Capital's Visionary Leadership under Newman Leech
RE Capital's Visionary Leadership under Newman LeechRE Capital's Visionary Leadership under Newman Leech
RE Capital's Visionary Leadership under Newman LeechNewman George Leech
 
M.C Lodges -- Guest House in Jhang.
M.C Lodges --  Guest House in Jhang.M.C Lodges --  Guest House in Jhang.
M.C Lodges -- Guest House in Jhang.Aaiza Hassan
 
Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...
Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...
Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...lizamodels9
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Tech Startup Growth Hacking 101 - Basics on Growth Marketing
Tech Startup Growth Hacking 101  - Basics on Growth MarketingTech Startup Growth Hacking 101  - Basics on Growth Marketing
Tech Startup Growth Hacking 101 - Basics on Growth Marketing
 
VIP Call Girl Jamshedpur Aashi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Jamshedpur
VIP Call Girl Jamshedpur Aashi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service JamshedpurVIP Call Girl Jamshedpur Aashi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Jamshedpur
VIP Call Girl Jamshedpur Aashi 8250192130 Independent Escort Service Jamshedpur
 
Pitch Deck Teardown: NOQX's $200k Pre-seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: NOQX's $200k Pre-seed deckPitch Deck Teardown: NOQX's $200k Pre-seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: NOQX's $200k Pre-seed deck
 
Call Girls Miyapur 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Miyapur 7001305949 all area service COD available Any TimeCall Girls Miyapur 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Miyapur 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
 
Call Girls in Gomti Nagar - 7388211116 - With room Service
Call Girls in Gomti Nagar - 7388211116  - With room ServiceCall Girls in Gomti Nagar - 7388211116  - With room Service
Call Girls in Gomti Nagar - 7388211116 - With room Service
 
KestrelPro Flyer Japan IT Week 2024 (English)
KestrelPro Flyer Japan IT Week 2024 (English)KestrelPro Flyer Japan IT Week 2024 (English)
KestrelPro Flyer Japan IT Week 2024 (English)
 
Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...
Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...
Call Girls In Radisson Blu Hotel New Delhi Paschim Vihar ❤️8860477959 Escorts...
 
Call Girls Pune Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Pune Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Pune Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Pune Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...
Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...
Lowrate Call Girls In Laxmi Nagar Delhi ❤️8860477959 Escorts 100% Genuine Ser...
 
7.pdf This presentation captures many uses and the significance of the number...
7.pdf This presentation captures many uses and the significance of the number...7.pdf This presentation captures many uses and the significance of the number...
7.pdf This presentation captures many uses and the significance of the number...
 
/:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In...
/:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In.../:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In...
/:Call Girls In Indirapuram Ghaziabad ➥9990211544 Independent Best Escorts In...
 
Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
Call Girls Navi Mumbai Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Avail...
 
GD Birla and his contribution in management
GD Birla and his contribution in managementGD Birla and his contribution in management
GD Birla and his contribution in management
 
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSMMonte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
 
Grateful 7 speech thanking everyone that has helped.pdf
Grateful 7 speech thanking everyone that has helped.pdfGrateful 7 speech thanking everyone that has helped.pdf
Grateful 7 speech thanking everyone that has helped.pdf
 
BEST Call Girls In Greater Noida ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
BEST Call Girls In Greater Noida ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,BEST Call Girls In Greater Noida ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
BEST Call Girls In Greater Noida ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
 
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
 
RE Capital's Visionary Leadership under Newman Leech
RE Capital's Visionary Leadership under Newman LeechRE Capital's Visionary Leadership under Newman Leech
RE Capital's Visionary Leadership under Newman Leech
 
M.C Lodges -- Guest House in Jhang.
M.C Lodges --  Guest House in Jhang.M.C Lodges --  Guest House in Jhang.
M.C Lodges -- Guest House in Jhang.
 
Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...
Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...
Call Girls In Sikandarpur Gurgaon ❤️8860477959_Russian 100% Genuine Escorts I...
 

2018 03 28 kush rathod a.1.steak sauce

  • 1. A.1. Steak Sauce: Lawry’s Defense MKM805 – Strategic Marketing Management To- Duncan Reith From- Kush Rathod Student ID -102108172 Email ID- Krathod2@MySeneca.ca Date - 28Th March 2018 1
  • 2. What measures should A.1. Steak Sauce take to increase dollar market share in long run while competing from new entrant in category and maintain 20% of sales during promotional weeks ? Challenges Assessment A.1. Steak Sauce A.1. Steak Sauce faces challenge to increase consumption of steak sauce per occasion This problem can’t be dealt with on immediate basis Competitors A.1. steak sauce doesn’t face any threat from existing competitors as A.1. has been successful to establish itself over years Existing competitors are minimal threat to business as Heinz 57 is not a direct competitor and Private label products have market share less than 20% Promotions Promotional weeks is the time when A.1. spends most revenue on its marketing and bears loss of reducing prices during this weeks Promotions are necessary to increase its sale in market and maintain it’s brand awareness during promotional week. It can not be changed and has to bear loss Channels Retailers have power to dictate their margins. Margins are same during the promotional week and manufacturer covered cost for price reduction. Manufacturers need to secure their position in flyers during the promotional week as retailers tend to only have one product per category Channel margins cannot be negotiated and has highest shelf facing which is in company’s interest to face to any new competition Lawry Lawry is a brand of Unilever which gives them strong recall in the minds of consumers Lawry is going to spend 20 million dollars for its advertising while coming up with 2 for 5$ promotional offer to enter into steak sauce market Lawry’s Live is one the initiative to attract consumers and it can lead to help them gain market share Lawry’s launch will affect market share of A.1. steak sauce due to Unilever’s strong brand presence. Promotions offered by Lawry has potential to capture new customers and needs to be looked after to sustain in market. Consumers Consumers are highly brand conscious and they are more likely to buy from premium brands during an occasion. Lawry’s advertising and promotional efforts can change behavior of an consumer to buy new product at cheaper price Consumers can be affected by heavy advertising and result into trial purchase among consumers Consumers may not change it’s brand preference but there are high chances they might try Lawry’s steak sauce through Lawry’s Live 2
  • 3. A.1. Steak Sauce has a strong brand presence in market with minimum competition, it faces an immediate risk from Lawry’s Steak who is set to launch on April 1 with its promotional offer of 2 for 5$ on memorial day A.1 .Steak Sauce • A.1. is the longest and well established player in the steak sauce market with dollar share more than 50% • It has a high consumer value in steak sauce market compared to other brands • Expansion of A.1. failed while launching “Poultry sauce Competitors • There was limited competition in steak sauce market • Heinz 57 was largest brand competitor in market • Private Label were sold at 3.49$ in retail stores but were least famous in steak sauce category • Lawry is one of the upcoming competitor with an leading market share in Marinades category Channels • Retailers had strong channel power with commission of 30% for all items in category • 9/10 steak houses served A.1. Steak sauce which created high brand awareness among consumers • A.1.Steak sauce is available in all grocery store, mass merchandisers stores and club stores • Retailers earn 123 million$ from all its brand Consumers • Volume sales has been flat in recent years • Steak sauce was consumed in a lesser quantity per occasion • Consumers tend to buy more during holidays like memorial day and fourth of July • There is strong loyalty in steak sauce market Lawry • Lawry is owned by Unilever which has a strong position in Marinades and seasoning industry • Lawry’s Marinades category is growing 15% annually • Considerably low pricing of Lawry’s steak sauce compared to A.1. Steak sauce at 3.99$ • Lawry’s steak sauce is spending 20 million $ and dropped 5 FSI focusing on May, June and July Promotions • 20% of A.1. steak sauce revenue come during promotional week • A.1. steak sauce had promotional price of 4.49$ • A.1. steak sauce uses 10% of revenue in in- store promotion • There is strong loyalty in steak sauce market • FSI of 1 million dollar are dropped in each quarter by A.1. Steak Sauce A.1.has advantage of first mover in the market thereby having power to dominate price in market as it also matches perceived value of consumers Over years there are no new competitors in industry as the growth of units and volume is stagnant irrespective of price Promotional week are most important as steak sauce is an occasional product and it is the best time to grab attention of consumers Retailers have strong influence on brands as their margins are hardly negotiable and only support one product per category during promotional week Consumers can only be attracted during point of purchase as it is more of an impulsive behavior and prices of product are not much affected on their purchasing decision as it’s occasional product Lawry being of the successful brand in Marinade; it is trying to capture market and risk entering steak sauce as it has financial power 3
  • 4. Retailers play important role to steak sauce business and A.1. plays important part in retailers business 4 -Retailers earn $62,997,424 from A.1.Steak sauce overall -A.1.Steak Sauce has highest shelf spacing of 6 and overall 14 -Retailers margin is as high as 30% which remains to be same during promotional week -Manufacturers are tend to sponsor in-store promotions during promotional week -11.5 million $ is earned only through one product during 2 weeks which shows high demand of A.1. Steak sauce among consumers
  • 5. A.1. Steak Sauce has high perceived value compared to Lawry’s Steak Sauce due to it’s well established brand image and can offer 3 pricing to compete with Lawry’s Steak Sauce during its promotional week Perceived value by consumer based on everyday pricing Quality Price Brands Prices per Piece A.1. Steak Sauce 4.99$ Heinz 57 4.79$ Private Label 3.49$ Lawry’s Steak Sauce 3.99$ A.1.Steak Sauce Heinz 57 Lawry’s Steak Sauce Private Label Products Brands Prices A.1. Steak Sauce 4.49$ A.1. Steak Sauce 4.00$ A.1. Steak Sauce 2 piece for 5$ Lawry’s Steak Sauce 2 pieces for 5$ Perceived value by consumer based on promotional pricing after launch of Lawry Price Quality A.1. Steak Sauce’s 4.49$ A.1. Steak Sauce’s 4.00$ Lawry’s 2 for 5$ A.1.Steak Sauce’s 2 for 5$ A.1. Steak Sauce has 3 possible pricing option to compete with Lawry’s promotional price in grocery stores • A.1. Steak Sauce can sell it’s product for 2 for 5$ which will attract consumers who are looking to buy more and might change perception of quality of its product • A.1. Steak Sauce can sell it’s product for 4.00$ and give consumers a product which is well established at all time low price with highest perceived quality in market • A.1. Steak Sauce can sell it’s product at it’s original promotional price of 4.49$, which will not hamper brand reputation among consumers thereby not changing it’s perceived value A.1. Steak Sauce has highest perceived quality of steak sauce among all of its competitors in market 5
  • 6. Possible alternative options affects retailers profit as 20% number of steak sauce is sold in 2 promotional weeks Customer wants and needs Customers are more likely to buy products during weeks of Memorial day and 4th of July Customers are willing to pay price but are looking for products which tastes good and can’t ruin their day by having imperfect meal Customers consume steak sauce in less quantity as low as one tablespoon per serving Companies like Heinz 57 distinguish themselves by its taste and appearance Channel Capabilities and cost A.1. steak sauce is available in most of the groceries , mass merchandisers and club stores Retailers have a margin of 30% which is to be changed rarely Channel power and influence Retailers only run one promotion per product per category during promotional week Retailers margin doesn’t change during promotional week Competitive postures and actions A.1. has most amount of shelf spacing compared to other brands A.1. has been market leader and there are no new entrants in market Forces affecting channel 11.5 million $ is earned in promotional week by retailers by selling A.1. Steak Sauce at 4.49$ Alternatives Effects on Retailers A.1. Steak Sauce 2 for 5$ Retailers tend to make earnings of 6.4 million $ which is a huge loss of 5.1 million dollars compared to its original promotional price As Steak sauce is consumed in less quantity it is more likely people are looking to buy one product irrespective of price which completely fails motive of promotional price A.1. Steak Sauce 1 for 4$ Retailers earn around 10 million$ which has a bearable loss of 1 million$ compared to its original promotional price. Selling it for 4$ taps into the wants of consumers which might increase sales A.1. Steak Sauce selling at original promotional price of 4.49$ for 1 piece A.1. Steak sauce selling at original promotional price might affect its market share due to new entry from Lawry Retailers play important role during promotional week as they have power to support one brand and consumers tend to buy more through retailers during this weeks 6
  • 7. Price Sensitivity helps us to evaluate buying behavior of consumer during promotional week and their motive towards buying steak sauce Consumer economics • Steak Sauce bought during all year round is tend to be used by consumer itself , on other hand , Steak sauce bought during holiday weeks are tend to be used during feasts and social gatherings • Higher price doesn’t necessarily indicate higher quality but the quality of brand plays an important role while buying this product as customers are looking for good experience of meal during holidays and won’t think much about prices during this period • Price of the steak sauce is minimal compared to the earnings of a consumer and can be afforded by consumers Customer Search and Usage • Buyers doesn’t have to pay much while switching brands • Consumers can easily compare prices with other competitors as most the products are available in same location • Consumers can taste other steak sauces only after buying them. Lawry’s Live can be possible factor to attract consumers by trying them taste the product • Time of purchase play vital role as consumers tend to buy products during holidays of memorial day and 4th of July Competition • Steak sauce offering by Heinz 57 is considered to be different in taste and appearance compared to others • Product testing showed us that Lawry’s product isn’t good as compared to A.1. original • A.1. Steak Sauce matches value as perceived by the consumers • A.1. is one of the long established brand which brings trust among consumers • Lawry’ Steak sauce can leverage it’s brand image as it is globally known for many of its product Alternatives Price sensitivity affecting during promotional week A.1. Steak Sauce 2 for 5$ Price is not an important consideration during holiday period as they are looking for taste and reliable brand 2for 5S might dilute quality of product A.1. Steak Sauce 1 for 4$ 4$ for 1 during promotional week can attract consumers while maintaining the perception of quality of product and has less impact on brand equity in long run A.1. Steak Sauce selling at original promotional price of 4.49$ for 1 piece Stable prices over years during promotion doesn’t hamper brand equity and this deal is less attractive than 4 $ as people are looking to spend less while getting higher quality of product 7 Consumers are not price conscious but looking for quality of products
  • 8. A.1. Steak Sauce can sell 2 pieces for $5 during promotional week and price match with its competition Lawry’s steak sauce Evaluating Criteria Assessment Consumer’s purchasing behavior Consumer tend to buy same amount product as their consumption per occasion is less Effect on competitor It might help us to gain more market share dollars by competing at price of private labels Long term effect This might destroy our brand equity in market thereby giving Lawry a chance to capture market by leveraging it’s parent brand Short term effect This will help A.1. Steak sauce increase market share while taking a hit in operating revenue Effects on channel Retailers may demand higher margin due loss of 5.1 million dollars Brand Perception In long run it brand perception might be hampered regarding quality of product Change in Operating Revenue A.1. Steak sauce has to make additional promotional cost of 12 million dollar to compete with Lawry’s promotion activities Insights • Discounting products will not lead to more consumption as required quantity is low per serving • A.1. Steak Sauce is considered a good quality of brand which is generally perceived as high prices but due to this pricing it can be perceived as a brand having reduced brand quality • 12 million dollar loss will only help to tackle competition in short run while hampering brand’s overall image • This move indicates that we are the follower of price according to competition which will tarnish brand image which are established over long time 8
  • 9. A.1. Steak Sauce can continue its original promotional strategy by selling one piece for $4.49 during promotional week and not be bothered by new entrant in the market because of it’s brand equity Evaluating Criteria Assessment Consumer’s purchasing behavior Consumer tend to opt for same brand as they tend to be highly brand loyal and same prices increases brand recall about the product Effect on competitor A.1. Steak Sauce might lose dollar share to Lawry’s Steak sauce due to its derived brand value and high promotion which might just motivate consumers to try new products Long term effect Selling at original promotional price helps to withstand its brand equity in long run Short term effect A.1. Steak sauce has a loss of 2.5% market share which gives them a loss of 4.3 million dollars Effects on channel Retailers earn most revenue in all 3 possible scenarios of 11.5 million dollars. Brand Perception Brand perception will remain same and will be stagnant due to its long presence in market with no sudden price changes Change in Operating Revenue Operating revenue drops to 55.6 million dollars due to Lawry Steak sauce’s entry in market Insights • A.1. Steak sauce is well established and long established brand which gives them first movers advantage of being judged upon • Over years A.1.steak sauce has created brand image with its unique taste which gives them satisfaction during special occasions • A.1. Steak sauce is considered to be good quality brand compared to any Lawry’s steak sauce • A.1. Steak Sauce provides good amount of earnings to channel through its business which gives us some power to leverage channel 9
  • 10. A.1. Steak Sauce can sell one for 4$ while maintaining its brand equity for longer term while minimizing it’s losses in short term Evaluating Criteria Assessment Consumer’s purchasing behavior Selling at 4$ will have no effect on its brand value while attracting consumers to buy product with highest quality at least cost available Effect on competitor Selling at 4$ will nullify effect of the trade promotions by Lawry’s steak sauce and might be able to capture market share from other competitors Long term effect Selling at 4$ will have to protect its market share in long term while maintaining its brand equity Short term effect Selling at 4$ will create tough competition to capture market share during its promotional week. Effects on channel Channels has to bear minimum loss of 1 million dollars compared to alternative of 2 for 5$ which is negotiable due to its relation with retailer over years Brand Perception Brand perception will remain same as it can be considered as one of the possible perceived price to sell high quality of product Change in Operating Revenue A.1. Steak Sauce has to bear loss of 3 million dollars which help to compete and survive in market Insights • Selling one bottle for 4$ will help to achieve its long term and short term goal while giving a signal to new entrant in market • As there are no new competitors in market and with perception of high price for high quality is being developed in minds of consumers over year. • Selling one bottle for 4$ will be considered as one of the brand which is willing to give cheaper price for high quality products • Due to high loyalty in steak sauce category consumers are less likely to change their brand 10
  • 11. 4.49$ - Original promotional price • Not changing price during promotional week effects its volume market share with a decline of 2.5% • Due to loss of market share A.1. Steak Units sold has to face drop of 466,772 units • A.1. face loss of 4.3 million dollars while taking no action against its brand competitor 2 for 5$ • Price matching with competitor will lead to increase in promotion efforts by 12 million $ • Increase in promotional efforts leads to loss in operating revenue • Decrease in consumers cuts affects channel behavior in longer run Selling one for 4$ • Promotional cost has to be increase by 2% to match Lawry’s competition. • A.1. has to bear loss of 3 million dollars compared to 2002 • With decent cut of 1.2$ per unit retailers are to be satisfied by A.1.’s offering Financial analysis of each possible options helps us to understand loss of company and if it is investing it’s money in precise channel to select an alternative 11 In worst case scenario A.1. steak sauce can loose market share of 10% but due to its high brand presence it is difficult to loose its to entire share to one category. Therefore, 10% is divided among A.1., Heinz 57 , Private label and other products
  • 12. A.1. Steak Sauce should price itself at 4$ per bottle during promotional week while Lawry is trying to target it’s consumer at 2 for 5$ • By selling at price of 4$ per bottle A.1. Steak sauce can achieve it’s objective of tackling threat from Lawry’s pricing during promotional week and maintain it’s brand value in long term • Selling at 4$ per bottle will give them loss of 3 million $ which can be covered in future years • Consumers are looking for high quality products and by maintaining reputation of being premium, it will help us to target consumers • Retailers are being one of the channels having power, during the promotional week of 4$ for 1 they earn 10 million dollars 1 million less than usual. • Price doesn’t play important role in purchase decision of Steak sauce during promotional week on other hand quality matters which is offered by A.1. Steak sauce 12 Fulfilling needs of consumers, providing good percent of margin and offering better perceived value than Lawry’s Steak sauce during promotion puts us in win win win situation • As Lawry is being launched on first week of April , A.1. can only play on its pricing tactics which leaves out of option to put Lawry • Lawry’s sole motivation is to enter market as it is doing good in marinades line which gives them some room enter other category • A.1. being of one well established brand created high brand loyalty among consumers over years which has created perceived perfect blend taste and quality of sauce in the eyes of consumers