2. PRO: Cost Effective for Students
Alleviates the need for expensive textbooks and materials.
Reduces financial stresses for students which promotes cognitive function.
Eliminates students having to decide NOT to purchase textbooks due to
costs.
Reduces financial barriers for students and promotes graduation rates.
3. PRO: Educator Innovation
Reduces restrictions of how teachers can interact with educational
resources.
Allows educators to adjust resources to fit the needs of their courses.
Multiple viewpoints can be incorporated into course materials rather than
a singular viewpoint from one or two textbooks.
Provides ability to make real-time adjustments to course materials.
4. PRO: Often Cutting Edge
Can be improved quickly through direct editing or feedback.
Current events can be applied to course materials where appropriate.
Alleviates the need to wait for publications of new editions for updates.
5. PRO: Digitalized Learning
Digital distribution of necessary textbooks.
Increased accessibility for students with barriers.
Educators may use a variety of high quality worksheets from OER websites
rather than low quality printed versions.
6. PRO: Collaboration
Promotes networking of educators to develop materials for common
courses.
Peer review increases standards of OER quality.
Create resources that can be used across disciplines.
7. CON: Quality Issues
Anyone can create an account and post material so some resources may
not be accurate.
If resource is not continuously updated it may become obsolete and
inaccurate.
Additional time taken to review quality of resources.
8. CON: Extra Effort for Educators
Modifying resources to apply to courses.
Verifying copyrights.
Providing materials in LMS.
Verifying any links used are still accurate prior to each quarter/semester.
9. CON: Technology Issues
Poor internet connection to access materials.
Specific software may be required to access materials that students may
not have.
Students may not have continual access to laptop/computer.
Students may not have continual access to internet.
10. CON: Accessibility
Some materials are published in formats that may be difficult for students
to download and access.
Resources may not be ADA compliant and will need to be double checked
prior to usage.
Not all resources are properly formatted for the use of screenreaders.
11. CON: Inequity to Resources
Most OERs available only in English without other language options.
If OER is only in one language, must be translated.
12. Attributions
"Introduction to Open Educational Resources" by The University of Texas at Arlington is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0
"Benefits of OERs" by The University of Adelaide is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
"Why OER?" by Online Consortium of Oklahoma is licensed under CC BY 4.0
"Pros and Cons of Using OERs for Instruction" by University of Maryland Global Campus is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0