Nutrient Solution Formulation for Hydroponic (Perlite, Rockwool, NFT) Tomatoes in Florida

1. HS796
Nutrient Solution Formulation for Hydroponic (Perlite,
Rockwool, NFT) Tomatoes in Florida1
George J. Hochmuth and Robert C. Hochmuth2
1. This document is HS796, one of a series of the Horticultural Sciences Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date October 1990 as
SSVEC44. Revised April 2001. Reviewed March 2015. Visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.
2. George J. Hochmuth, professor, Soil and Water Science; and Robert C. Hochmuth, Extension agent IV, North Florida Research and Education Center,
UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville, FL 32611.
The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to
individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national
origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other UF/IFAS Extension publications, contact your county’s UF/IFAS Extension office.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, UF/IFAS Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A & M University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County
Commissioners Cooperating. Nick T. Place, dean for UF/IFAS Extension.
Plants require 16 elements for growth and these nutrients
can be supplied from air, water, and fertilizers. The 16
elements are carbon (C), hydrogen (H), oxygen (O),
phosphorus (P), potassium (K), nitrogen (N), sulfur (S),
calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), magnesium (Mg), boron (B),
manganese (Mn), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), molybdenum
(Mo), and chlorine (Cl). The key to successful management
of a fertilizer program is to ensure adequate concentrations
of all nutrients throughout the life cycle of the crop. Inad-
equate or excessive amounts of any nutrient result in poor
crop performance. Excessive amounts can be especially
troublesome since they can damage the crop, waste money
and fertilizer resources, and pollute the environment when
fertilizer is released during flushing of the nutrient delivery
system.
For Florida greenhouse vegetable producers, management
focuses on all nutrients except for C, H, and O. The latter
three elements are usually supplied in adequate amounts
from air and water. Growers in northern climates, where
greenhouses are not ventilated in the winter, see benefits
from additions of C from carbon dioxide (CO2
). Increased
yields in Florida from additions of CO2
are unlikely due to
the need for frequent ventilation.
Crop demand for nutrients changes through the season.
Small amounts of nutrients are needed early, then the
demand increases as the crop grows, especially after several
clusters of fruit have been set on the plant. A common
problem comes early in the season when plants become too
vegetative (bullish) from too much N. The bullish growth
distorts the leaves and stems, causing cracks and grooves
in the stems. These openings are excellent entry ports for
decay-causing organisms such as soft rot. Bullish plants
usually produce misshapen fruits often with significant
amounts of blossom-end rot and cat-facing. Keeping the
N level low (60 to 70 parts per million) early in the season
helps eliminate bullishness.
High K also can be a problem since it can interfere with
the plant’s capability to absorb Ca and Mg. Plants exposed
to excess K often develop Mg deficiency on the lower
leaves and the fruits often develop blossom-end rot (BER),
especially early in the season.
Nutrient management programs should begin with an
understanding of the nutrient solution concentrations in
parts per million (ppm) for the various nutrients required
by tomato plants. By managing the concentrations of
individual nutrients, growers can control the growth and
yield of the crop. Table 1 presents the fertilizer recommen-
dations for tomatoes for the various growth stages during
the season in Florida. These recommendations are appli-
cable to all types of production systems (perlite, rockwool,
and NFT) in which healthy roots are maintained, and are
a suitable base when determining a nutrient solution plan
for cucumbers and peppers. However, cucumbers will need
more N early in the season than tomato.

2. 2Nutrient Solution Formulation for Hydroponic (Perlite, Rockwool, NFT) Tomatoes in Florida
The major elements to manage are N and K for the reasons
cited above. The program outlined in Table 1 has been
proven in Florida and should provide adequate nutrition
and avoid the problems of bullishness as well as the prob-
lems of fruit ripening disorders indirectly caused by excess
K. Final solution pH should be in the range of 5.8 to 6.2.
One of the first steps in a nutrient management program is
to test the well water. A water sample should be analyzed
for pH, carbonates, S, Mg, Ca, and Fe. Most well water in
Florida has pH greather than 6.5. The pH and carbonates
are used to guide in the acidification of the nutrient solu-
tion. Water from many wells in Florida contains significant
amounts of Ca and often small amounts of Mg. Growers
can take advantage of these nutrients, which in the case of
Ca, might be 40 to 60 ppm. Some, but probably not all of
this Ca is available to the crop.
Sulfur and iron concentrations are determined because
they can increase potential for irrigation emitter clogging
from bacterial slimes that use the Fe and S for growth.
These nutrients generally are not considered in the nutrient
formulation calculations.
Formulation Methods
There are basically two methods to supply the fertilizer
nutrients to the crop: 1) premixed products, or 2) grower-
formulated solutions. The two methods differ in the
approach to formulating the fertilizer and the resulting
nutrient-use efficiency. Fertilizer materials that can be used
for both methods are presented in Table 2. The formulae
in this publication are for a final dilution of 1 gallon each
stock to 100 gallons of final solution. If using proportioners
installed in parallel on one water source line, amounts of
fertilizers in stocks will need to be calculated keeping in
mind the intended final concentrations.
Pre-Mix Method
There are several commercial pre-mixed fertilizer formula-
tions and some of these generalized formulations are
presented in Table 2. Some of these materials contain Mg,
some do not. Those that do not will need to be supple-
mented with magnesium sulfate. All formulations need
supplementing with Ca (from calcium nitrate or calcium
chloride) and N (from several possible sources). Formula-
tions using these premixed materials that approximate
the recommended program are presented in Table 3. In
Table 3, the amount of pre-mixed material was chosen to
provide adequate P since the pre-mixed material is the
only source of P. The pre-mixed materials contain large
amounts of K making it difficult to achieve the desired K
and Ca concentrations. This could cause an early problem
with BER when there is excess K coming from the A stock
and a low Ca concentration in the well water (below 50
ppm) because K can interfere with Ca uptake by the root.
This problem is common to all pre-mixed formulae. More
Ca can be supplied from calcium chloride but it would be
better to have lower K concentrations. A related problem
is that some of the pre-mixed formulae have too much N
in the formulation to allow for providing adequate Ca by
adding calcium nitrate. An option to increase the Ca in the
solution is to supplement the calcium nitrate stock with
calcium chloride. Each pound of calcium chloride (36% Ca)
in 30 gallons of stock solution results in a 14 ppm increase
in Ca in the final nutrient solution delivered to the plants.
The pre-mixed materials come fairly close to providing the
desired concentrations of micronutrients, although some
are higher than needed in Florida.
Formulation Recipe Method
Information on formulating fertilizer solutions from
individual ingredients is presented in Tables 4 and 5. Four
formulae are presented to provide options for formulat-
ing nutrient solutions depending on grower preference.
Formula 1 uses phosphoric acid to provide P and to simul-
taneously partially acidify the nutrient solution. Additional
acidification might be required for some water and this
can be accomplished with sulfuric acid. This formula also
uses potassium chloride to provide K. There is no problem
with using potassium chloride as a partial source of K.
It provides K in the same form as potassium nitrate and
potassium chloride is less expensive. The chloride ion is
not toxic to plants in these amounts provided and some
research shows that it contributes to fewer fruits with soft
rot Only greenhouse soluble-grade potassium chloride
should be used. Formula 1 also uses individual chemicals to
provide the micronutrients.
Formula 2 is a variation of formula 1, however, formula 2
uses a pre-mixed micronutrient package, S.T.E.M. (soluble
trace element mixture), to supply most of the micronutri-
ents. However, S.T.E.M. does not, alone, provide enough
B, Fe, or Mo, so these are supplemented from individual
ingredients.
Formula 3 uses monopotassium phosphate to provide
the P and some K. Monopotassium phosphate is the
most common source of P in the commercial pre-mixed
materials. Acidification of the nutrient solution should
be accomplished by another acid such as sulfuric acid.
Formula 3 also uses potassium chloride and provides the
micronutrients from individual ingredients.

3. 3Nutrient Solution Formulation for Hydroponic (Perlite, Rockwool, NFT) Tomatoes in Florida
Formula 4 uses potassium nitrate to supply all of the K.
One potential problem in this formula is that large amounts
of N are also supplied with the potassium nitrate and this
restricts the amounts of calcium nitrate that can be added.
Reducing the calcium nitrate too far might lead to BER
unless the well water is supplying some Ca. Supplying some
of the K from potassium chloride will allow room for more
calcium nitrate.
Products for the formula method are easily obtainable
in Florida and this method should result in considerable
financial savings, especially for large growers. There is
a small amount of extra effort involved in the formula
method due to the extra measuring. The resulting higher
degree of control over the nutrient supply to the crop
should more than pay back any increased effort.
Water-Fertilization Relationship
The nutrient solution formulations presented in this
publication were designed for production systems using
hydroponic approaches to tomato culture. The media
discussed in this publication (perlite, rockwool or NFT)
require frequent irrigations during the day, ranging from
10 to 20 cycles per day, depending on the weather and
greenhouse environment, in order to maintain about 20%
solution leach. It is impossible to have an exact formula-
tion that will work for every production system under
any environmental conditions. For example, when using
a media of high water-holding capacity, fewer irrigation
cycles will be needed during the day. In this situation,
the nutrient concentrations in the irrigation water might
need to be greater than those presented in this publication
so that adequate nutrition is supplied. A general rule-of-
thumb is that nutrient concentrations need to be greater in
production systems requiring fewer irrigations, compared
to systems requiring more frequent irrigations.

4. 4Nutrient Solution Formulation for Hydroponic (Perlite, Rockwool, NFT) Tomatoes in Florida
Table 1. Fertilizer recommendations for hydroponic (perlite, rockwool, and NFT) tomatoes in Florida.
Stage of growth
1 2 3 4 5
Nutrient Transplant to
1st
cluster
1st
cluster to
2nd
cluster
2nd
cluster to
3rd
cluster
3rd
cluster to
5th
cluster
5th
cluster to
termination
--------------- Final delivered nutrient solution concentration (ppm)z
--------------
N 70 80 100 120 150
P 50 50 50 50 50
K 120 120 150 150 200
Ca 150 150 150 150 150
Mg 40 40 40 50 50
S 50 50 50 60 60
Fe 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8
Cu 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Mn 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
Zn 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
B 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
Mo 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
NOTE: Ca, Mg, and S concentrations may vary depending on Ca and Mg concentration in wellwater and amount of sulfuric acid used for
acidification.
z
1ppm = 1mg/liter

5. 5Nutrient Solution Formulation for Hydroponic (Perlite, Rockwool, NFT) Tomatoes in Florida
Table 2. Pre-mixed and individual-salt fertilizer materials for use in hydroponic nutrient solution formulations.
Selected Pre-mixed Materialsz
Nutrient Pre-mix 1
4-18-38
%
Pre-mix 2
3-15-27
%
Pre-mix 3
5-11-26
%
Pre-mix 4
7-17-37
%
N 4 3 5 7
P2
O5
(P) 18 (7.7) 15 (6.5) 11 (4.7) 17 (7.3)
K2
O (K) 38 (32) 27 (22) 26 (22) 37 (31)
Mg 0 5.32 0 0
Fe 0.4 0.45 0.31 0.40
Mn 0.2 0.057 0.05 0.10
Zn 0.05 0.034 0.016 0.02
Cu 0.05 0.011 0.016 0.01
B 0.20 0.170 0.05 0.18
Mo 0.01 0.011 0.01 0.01
Individual Ingredientsy
Ammonium nitrate (NH4
NO3
) 33.5% N
Calcium nitrate liquid (7-0-0-11) 12.1 lb/gal (Ca(NO3
)2
) 7%N, 11% Ca
Calcium nitrate (Ca(NO3
)2
)-dry 15% N, 19% Ca
Calcium chloride (CaCl2
) 36% Ca
Potassium nitrate (KNO3
) 13% N, 36.5 K
Monopotassium phosphate (KH2
PO4
) 23% P, 28% K
Phosphoric acid (H3
PO4
) 13 lb./gal. 23% P
Potassium chloride (KCl) - greenhouse 51% K
Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4
) 10% Mg, 14% S
Solubor 20.5% B
Copper sulfate (CuSO4
) 25% Cu
Zinc sulfate (ZnSO4
) 36% Zn
Iron, Fe 330 chelated iron, etc. 10% Fe
Manganous sulfate (MnSO4
) 28% Mn
Sodium molybdate (Na2
(Mo)4
) (liquid), (11.4 lb/gal) 17% Mo
Sodium molybdate (dry) Na2
(MoO4
) 39.6 % Mo
Soluble Trace Element Mixture (S.T.E.M.): 1.35% B
7.5% Fe
8.0% Mn
0.04%Mo
4.5% Zn
3.2% Cu
Convert K2
O to K by multiplying by 0.83. Convert P2
O5
to P by multiplying by 0.44.
z
Mention of a trade name does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation.
y
Exact nutrient concentration of the fertilizer material may vary depending on commercial source.

6. 6Nutrient Solution Formulation for Hydroponic (Perlite, Rockwool, NFT) Tomatoes in Florida
Table 3. Examples of formulations using pre-mixed commercial materials.
Stage of growth
1 2 3 4 5
Transplant to 1st
cluster set
1st
cluster to
2nd
cluster
2nd
cluster to
3rd
cluster
3rd
cluster to
5th
cluster
5th
cluster to
termination
---------------------------Pre-mix 1 (4-18-38)------------------------
1 2 3 4 5
A Stock 16 lb. Pre-mix 1
10 lb. MgSO4
16 lb. Pre-mix 1
10 lb. MgSO4
16 lb. Pre-mix 1
10 lb. MgSO4
16 lb. Pre-mix 1
12 lb. MgSO4
16 lb. Pre-mix 1
12 lb. MgSO4
B Stock 7.5 lb. Ca(NO3
)2
9.5 lb. Ca(NO3
)2
12.0 lb. Ca(NO3
)2
16.5 lb. Ca(NO3
)2
20.5 lb. Ca(NO3
)2
-------------------------final concentrations (ppm)-------------------
N 70 82 100 124 148
P 49 49 49 49 49
K 200 200 200 200 200
Ca 56 71 94 124 154
Mg 40 40 40 48 48
S 50 50 50 60 60
Fe 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
Cu 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Mn 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
Zn 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
B 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
Mo 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
----------------------------------Pre-mix 2 (3-15-27)---------------------------
A Stock 20 lb Pre-mix 2 20 lb Pre-mix 2 20 lb Pre-mix 2 20 lb Pre-mix 2
2 lb MgSO4
20 lb Pre-mix 2
2 lb MgSO4
B Stock 7.5 lb Ca(NO3
)2
9.2 lb Ca(NO3
)2
12. 4 lb Ca(NO3
)2
15.7 lb Ca(NO3
)2
19 lb Ca(NO3
)2
2 lb KNO3
-------------------------final concentrations (ppm)---------------------------
N 70 80 100 120 150
P 51 51 51 51 51
K 178 178 178 178 208
Ca 57 69 93 118 143
Mg 42 42 42 50 50
S (est.) 50 50 50 60 60
Fe 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
Cu 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09
Mn 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45
Zn 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27
B 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35
Mo 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09
--------------------------Pre-mix 3 (5-11-26)----------------------------
1 2 3 4 5
A Stock 27 lb Pre-mix 3
10 lb. MgSO4
27 lb Pre-mix 3
10 lb. MgSO4
27 lb Pre-mix 3
10 lb. MgSO4
27 lb Pre-mix 3
12 lb. MgSO4
27 lb Pre-mix 3
12 lb. MgSO4
B Stock 2.8 lb Ca(NO3
)2
4.4 lb Ca(NO3
)2
7.7 lb Ca(NO3
)2
11 lb Ca(NO3
)2
16 lb Ca(NO3
)2
----------------------final concentrations (ppm)----------------------
N 70 80 100 120 150

7. 7Nutrient Solution Formulation for Hydroponic (Perlite, Rockwool, NFT) Tomatoes in Florida
Stage of growth
1 2 3 4 5
Transplant to 1st
cluster set
1st
cluster to
2nd
cluster
2nd
cluster to
3rd
cluster
3rd
cluster to
5th
cluster
5th
cluster to
termination
P 51 51 51 51 51
K 232 232 232 232 232
Ca 21 33 58 83 120
Mg 40 40 40 50 50
S 50 50 50 60 60
Fe 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3
Cu 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17
Mn 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55
Zn 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17
B 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55
Mo 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
-----------------------Pre-mix 4 (7-17-37)-----------------------
1 2 3 4 5
A Stock 17 lb. Pre-mix 4
10 lb. MgSO4
17 lb. Pre-mix 4
10 lb. MgSO4
17 lb. Pre-mix 4
10 lb. MgSO4
17 lb. Pre-mix 4
12 lb. MgSO4
17 lb. Pre-mix 4
12 lb. MgSO4
B Stock 4 lb. Ca(NO3
)2
6 lb. Ca(NO3
)2
9 lb. Ca(NO3
)2
12 lb. Ca(NO3
)2
17 lb. Ca(NO3
)2
--------------------------final concentrations (ppm)----------------------
N 71 83 101 119 149
P 49 49 49 49 49
K 208 208 208 208 208
Ca 30 45 67 89 127
Mg 40 40 40 48 48
S 50 50 50 60 60
Fe 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7
Cu 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Mn 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67
Zn 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14
B 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Mo 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
NOTE: Calculations in above table are for amount of fertilizer material in 30-gal stock tanks and then for a 1:100 dilution (1 gal each stock in 100
gals final nutrient solution). Fertilizer amounts placed in each stock tank will need to be doubled if fertilizer proportioner (1:100) pumps are
installed in parallel in same incoming water line.
Ca, Mg, and S values will vary upwards depending on the amount of Ca and Mg coming from the water source, and the of S coming from the
sulfuric acid used for acidification.

8. 8Nutrient Solution Formulation for Hydroponic (Perlite, Rockwool, NFT) Tomatoes in Florida
Table 4. The following list provides the ppm of a specific nutrient provided by a specified amount of a particular fertilizer material
for a 30-gal stock tank and a final dilution of 1:100.
Amount of material Material ppm nutrient provided
1 lb Potassium nitrate 5 ppm N
14.5 ppm K
1 lb Ammonium nitrate 13.3 ppm N
1 lb Potassium chloride 20.3 ppm K
1 lb Magnesium sulfate 4 ppm Mg
5.6 ppm S
1 pint Liquid calcium nitrate 4.2 ppm N
6.6 ppm Ca
1 lb Dry calcium nitrate 6.1 ppm N
7.5 ppm Ca
1 lb Calcium chloride 14.3 ppm Ca
1 quart Phosphoric acid 30 ppm P
1 gramz
Solubor 0.018 ppm B
0.5 lb Fe 330 chelated iron 2.0 ppm Fe
100 grams S.T.E.M. 0.12 ppm B
0.28 ppm Cu
0.66 ppm Fe
0.70 ppm Mn
0.0035 ppm Mo
0.39 ppm Zn
1 gram Copper sulfate 0.021 ppm Cu
1 gram Manganese sulfate 0.024 ppm Mn
1 gram Zinc sulfate 0.03 ppm Zn
1 ml Liquid sodium molybdate 0.02 ppm Mo
1 gram Dry sodium molybdate 0.03 ppm Mo
1 lb Monopotassium Phosphate 9 ppm P
11 ppm K
z
A gram scale or laboratory pipette will be needed to measure amounts of micronutrients or to calibrate a measuring spoon set to provide the
correct amount of micronutrient materials. The following are some approximate equivalences for measuring dry fertilizer materials.
Approximate weight (grams) for several measuring utensils
Fertilizer 1 teaspoon (level) 1 tablespoon (level) one dry“ounce”in measuring cup
Sequestrene Fe 330 4 14 20
Ammonium molybdate 7 - -
Sodium molybdate 4 - -
Solubor 2 6 10
S.T.E.M. 5 14 25
Manganese sulfate 6 16 30
Zinc sulfate 5 13 26
Copper sulfate 7 20 35

9. 9Nutrient Solution Formulation for Hydroponic (Perlite, Rockwool, NFT) Tomatoes in Florida
Table 5. Several examples of tomato nutrient solution formulations using the“formula method”with individual ingredients.
Stage of growth
1 2 3 4 5
Transplant to 1st
cluster
1st
cluster to
2nd
cluster
2nd
cluster to
3rd
cluster
3rd
cluster to
5th
cluster
5th
cluster to
termination
----------------------------------FORMULA 1-------------------------------
A Stock 3.3 pts
Phos. acid
3.3 pts
Phos. acid
3.3 pts
Phos acid
3.3 pts
Phos. acid
3.3 pts
Phos. acid
6 lb. KCl
10 lb. MgSO4
6 lb. KCl
10 lb. MgSO4
6 lb. KCl
10 lb. MgSO4
2 lb. KNO3
6 lb. KCl
12 lb. MgSO4
2 lb. KNO3
6 lb. KCl
12 lb. MgSO4
6 lb. KNO3
1 lb. NH4
NO3
10 gr CuSO4
35 gr MnSO4
10 gr ZnSO4
40 gr Solubor
3 ml Na Moly
10 gr CuSO4
35 gr MnSO4
10 gr ZnSO4
40 gr Solubor
3 ml Na Moly
10 gr CuSO4
35 gr MnSO4
10 gr ZnSO4
40 gr Solubor
3 ml Na Moly
10 gr CuSO4
35 gr MnSO4
10 gr ZnSO4
40 gr Solubor
3 ml Na Moly
10 gr CuSO4
35 gr MnSO4
10 gr ZnSO4
40 gr Solubor
3 ml Na Moly
B Stock 2.1 gal.
Ca(NO3
)2
2.4 gal.
Ca(NO3
)2
2.7 gal.
Ca(NO3
)2
3.3 gal.
Ca(NO3
)2
3.3 gal.
Ca(NO3
)2
or 11.5 lb dry
Ca(NO3
)2
or 13.1 lb dry
Ca(NO3
)2
or 14.8 lb dry
Ca(NO3
)2
or 18.0 lb dry
Ca(NO3
)2
or 18.0 lb dry
Ca(NO3
)2
0.7 lb Fe 330 0.7 lb Fe 330 0.7 lb Fe 330 0.7 lb Fe 330 0.7 lb Fe 330
----------------------final concentrations (ppm)------------------------
N 70 80 100 120 153
P 50 50 50 50 50
K 119 119 148 148 206
Ca 111 (86)z
127 (98) 143 (111) 174 (135) 174 (135)
Mg 40 40 40 48 48
S 56 56 56 66 66
Fe 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8
Cu 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Mn 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
Zn 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
B 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
Mo 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
---------------------------------FORMULA 2-------------------------------
A Stock 3.3 pts
Phos. acid
3.3 pts
Phos. acid
3.3 pts
Phos. acid
3.3 pts
Phos. acid
3.3 pts
Phos. acid
6 lb KCl
10 lb. MgSO4
6 lb KCl
10 lb. MgSO4
6 lb KCl
10 lb. MgSO4
2 lb. KNO3
6 lb KCl
12 lb. MgSO4
2 lb. KNO3
6 lb KCl
12 lb. MgSO4
6 lb. KNO3
1 lb. NH4
NO3
100 gr. S.T.E.M.
40 gr. Solubor
3 ml Na Moly
100 gr. S.T.E.M.
40 gr. Solubor
3 ml Na Moly
100 gr. S.T.E.M.
40 gr. Solubor
3 ml Na Moly
100 gr. S.T.E.M.
40 gr. Solubor
3 ml Na Moly
100 gr. S.T.E.M.
40 gr. Solubor
3 ml Na Moly
B Stock 2.1 gal
Ca (NO3
)2
2.4 gal
Ca (NO3
)2
2.7 gal
Ca (NO3
)2
3.3 gal
Ca (NO3
)2
3.3 gal
Ca (NO3
)2
or 11.5 lb dry
Ca (NO3
)2
or 13.1 lb dry
Ca (NO3
)2
or 14.8 lb dry
Ca (NO3
)2
or 18.0 lb dry
Ca (NO3
)2
or 18.0 lb dry
Ca (NO3
)2
0.5 lb Fe 330 0.5 lb Fe 330 0.5 lb Fe 330 0.5 lb Fe 330 0.5 lb Fe 330
---------------------------final concentrations (ppm)--------------------------
N 70 80 100 120 150

10. 10Nutrient Solution Formulation for Hydroponic (Perlite, Rockwool, NFT) Tomatoes in Florida
Stage of growth
1 2 3 4 5
Transplant to 1st
cluster
1st
cluster to
2nd
cluster
2nd
cluster to
3rd
cluster
3rd
cluster to
5th
cluster
5th
cluster to
termination
P 50 50 50 50 50
K 119 119 148 148 206
Ca 111(86)z
127(98) 143(111) 174(135) 174(135)
Mg 40 40 40 48 48
S 56 56 56 66 66
Fe 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7
Cu 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28
Mn 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
Zn 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39
B 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84
Mo 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
---------------------------------FORMULA 3---------------------------------
A Stock 5.5 lb KH2
PO4
4 lb KNO3
10 lb MgSO4
5.5 lb KH2
PO4
4 lb KNO3
10 lb MgSO4
5.5 lb KH2
PO4
5 lb KNO3
10 lb MgSO4
1 lb KCl
5.5 lb KH2
PO4
8 lb KNO3
12 lb MgSO4
1 lb KCl
5.5 lb KH2
PO4
8 lb KNO3
12 lb MgSO4
1 lb KCl
2 lb NH4
NO3
10 gr Cu SO4
35 gr Mn SO4
10 gr Zn SO4
40 gr Solubor
3 ml Na Moly
10 gr Cu SO4
35 gr Mn SO4
10 gr Zn SO4
40 gr Solubor
3 ml Na Moly
10 gr Cu SO4
35 gr Mn SO4
10 gr Zn SO4
40 gr Solubor
3 ml Na Moly
10 gr Cu SO4
35 gr Mn SO4
10 gr Zn SO4
40 gr Solubor
3 ml Na Moly
10 gr Cu SO4
35 gr Mn SO4
10 gr Zn SO4
40 gr Solubor
3 ml Na Moly
B Stock 1.5 gal
Ca(NO3
)2
1.8 gal
Ca(NO3
)2
2.2 gal
Ca(NO3
)2
2.4 gal
Ca(NO3
)2
2.5 gal
Ca(NO3
)2
or 8.2 lb dry
Ca(NO3
)2
or 9.8 lb dry
Ca(NO3
)2
or 12.3 lb dry
Ca(NO3
)2
or 13.1 lb dry
Ca(NO3
)2
or 13.7 lb dry
Ca(NO3
)2
0.7 lb Fe 330 0.7 lb Fe 330 0.7 lb Fe 330 0.7 lb Fe 330 0.7 lb Fe 330
------------------------final concentrations (ppm)----------------------
N 70 80 100 120 150
P 50 50 50 50 50
K 119 119 153 153 196
Ca 79(61)z
94(74) 118(92) 126(98) 131(103)
Mg 40 40 40 48 48
S 56 56 56 66 66
Fe 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8
Cu 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Mn 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
Zn 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
B 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
Mo 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
----------------------------FORMULA 4----------------------------
A Stock 3.3 pts
Phos. acid
8.3 lb. KNO3
10 lb. MgSO4
3.3 pts
Phos. acid
8.3 lb. KNO3
10 lb. MgSO4
3.3 pts
Phos. acid
10.3 lb. KNO3
10 lb. MgSO4
3.3 pts
Phos. acid
10.3 lb. KNO3
12 lb. MgSO4
3.3 pts
Phos. acid
13.8 lb. KNO3
12 lb. MgSO4

11. 11Nutrient Solution Formulation for Hydroponic (Perlite, Rockwool, NFT) Tomatoes in Florida
Stage of growth
1 2 3 4 5
Transplant to 1st
cluster
1st
cluster to
2nd
cluster
2nd
cluster to
3rd
cluster
3rd
cluster to
5th
cluster
5th
cluster to
termination
100 gr. S.T.E.M.
40 gr. Solubor
3 ml Na Moly
100 gr. S.T.E.M.
40 gr. Solubor
3 ml Na Moly
100 gr. S.T.E.M.
40 gr. Solubor
3 ml Na Moly
100 gr. S.T.E.M.
40 gr. Solubor
3 ml Na Moly
100 gr. S.T.E.M.
40 gr. Solubor
3 ml Na Moly
B Stock 6.7 pt.
Ca(NO3
)2
9 pt.
Ca(NO3
)2
11.4 pt.
Ca(NO3
)2
2 gal.
Ca(NO3
)2
2.4 gal.
Ca(NO3
)2
or 4.6 lb. dry
Ca(NO3
)2
or 6.2 lb. dry
Ca(NO3
)2
or 7.9 lb. dry
Ca(NO3
)2
or 11.1 lb. dry
Ca(NO3
)2
or 13.3 lb. dry
Ca(NO3
)2
0.7 lb. Fe 330 0.7 lb. Fe 330 0.7 lb. Fe 330 0.7 lb. Fe 330 0.7 lb. Fe 330
---------------------final concentrations (ppm)------------------------
N 70 80 100 120 150
P 50 50 50 50 50
K 120 120 150 150 200
Ca 44(35)z
59(47) 75 (59) 105 (83) 127 (100)
Mg 40 40 40 48 48
S 56 56 56 67 67
Fe 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7
Cu 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28
Mn 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
Zn 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39
B 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84
Mo 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
z
Numbers in parentheses are the ppm Ca when dry Ca(NO3
)2
is used instead of liquid.
NOTE: Calculations in above table are for amount of fertilizer material in 30-gal stock tanks and then for a 1:100 (1 gal each stock in 100 gals
final nutrient solution). Fertilizer amounts placed in each stock tank will need be doubled if proportioner (1:100) pumps are installed in parallel
in same incoming water line.
Ca, Mg, and S values will vary upwards depending on the amount of Ca and Mg coming from the water source, and the amount of S coming
from the sulfuric acid used for acidification.