PADM 620 Assignment 2: Statesmanship and Ethics Grading Rubric Criteria Levels of Achievement Content Advanced Proficient Developing Not Present Points Earned Analysis of Material 32 to 35 points All elements of the assigned topic are clearly and completely addressed in light of 5–7-page requirement. Analyses flow in a logical and effective manner, address all elements of the assignment thoroughly, and reach the nuances of the issues raised. Complex issues are navigated with precision, clarity, and detail. 29 to 31 points Major elements of the assigned topic are discussed in a meaningful way, but the paper would benefit from additional clarity, depth, or detail. Analyses are generally well constructed and complex issues are recognized. 1 to 28 points Some elements of the assigned topic are mentioned, but the discussion is incomplete, unclear, superficial, or otherwise does not meet expectations. Analyses are general and lacking in depth. Complex issues and nuances are overlooked. 0 points Assigned elements are not discussed. Organization 32 to 35 points The paper is focused and well organized. The paper has a clear thesis, and a clear and substantive introduction and conclusion. The paper effectively uses headings and subheadings, as appropriate, to focus and deepen analyses. 29 to 31 points The paper is reasonably well organized and follows a logical path from idea to idea and section to section. The paper includes an adequate introduction and conclusion. 1 to 28 points The paper is in need of additional organization and clarity. Ideas and/or sections of the paper either do not flow logically, or are in need of fundamental improvement. The paper is lacking an adequate introduction and/or conclusion. 0 points The paper lacks an introduction, conclusion, and meaningful organization. Content Advanced Proficient Developing Not Present Points Earned Evaluation, Synthesis, and Adequate Use of Sources 32 to 35 points Sources, concepts and ideas are evaluated critically and synthesized in a manner that moves beyond restatement and makes a valuable contribution to the assigned topic. 29 to 31 points Sources are used correctly and support the paper’s analyses and conclusions. Concepts and ideas are understood and linked in a reasonable way that supports the paper’s conclusions. Paper reflects a good familiarity with the major ideas, but would benefit from greater critical evaluation and synthesis. 1 to 28 points Some sources are used, but are not critically evaluated and/or are not used in an effective manner. Paper would benefit from a more substantive use of sources, more appropriate reliance on sources, and/or better skill in evaluating, synthesizing, or applying ideas, concepts, or sources. 0 points Sources are not used; ideas and concepts from sources are not evaluated or synthesized. Structure Advanced Proficient Developing Not Present Points Earned Mechanics 14 to 15 points No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Writing is ...

1. PADM 620
Assignment 2: Statesmanship and Ethics Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Points Earned
Analysis of Material
32 to 35 points
All elements of the assigned topic are clearly and completely
addressed in light of 5–7-page requirement. Analyses flow in a
logical and effective manner, address all elements of the
assignment thoroughly, and reach the nuances of the issues
raised. Complex issues are navigated with precision, clarity, and
detail.
29 to 31 points
Major elements of the assigned topic are discussed in a
meaningful way, but the paper would benefit from additional
clarity, depth, or detail. Analyses are generally well constructed
and complex issues are recognized.
1 to 28 points
Some elements of the assigned topic are mentioned, but the
discussion is incomplete, unclear, superficial, or otherwise does
not meet expectations. Analyses are general and lacking in
depth. Complex issues and nuances are overlooked.
0 points
Assigned elements are not discussed.
Organization
32 to 35 points
The paper is focused and well organized. The paper has a clear

2. thesis, and a clear and substantive introduction and conclusion.
The paper effectively uses headings and subheadings, as
appropriate, to focus and deepen analyses.
29 to 31 points
The paper is reasonably well organized and follows a logical
path from idea to idea and section to section. The paper
includes an adequate introduction and conclusion.
1 to 28 points
The paper is in need of additional organization and clarity.
Ideas and/or sections of the paper either do not flow logically,
or are in need of fundamental improvement. The paper is
lacking an adequate introduction and/or conclusion.
0 points
The paper lacks an introduction, conclusion, and meaningful
organization.
Content
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Points Earned
Evaluation, Synthesis, and Adequate Use of Sources
32 to 35 points
Sources, concepts and ideas are evaluated critically and
synthesized in a manner that moves beyond restatement and
makes a valuable contribution to the assigned topic.
29 to 31 points
Sources are used correctly and support the paper’s analyses and
conclusions. Concepts and ideas are understood and linked in a
reasonable way that supports the paper’s conclusions. Paper
reflects a good familiarity with the major ideas, but would
benefit from greater critical evaluation and synthesis.
1 to 28 points
Some sources are used, but are not critically evaluated and/or
are not used in an effective manner. Paper would benefit from a

3. more substantive use of sources, more appropriate reliance on
sources, and/or better skill in evaluating, synthesizing, or
applying ideas, concepts, or sources.
0 points
Sources are not used; ideas and concepts from sources are not
evaluated or synthesized.
Structure
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Points Earned
Mechanics
14 to 15 points
No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present.
Writing is precise and word choice is appropriate.
12 to 13 points
Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present.
Writing style is sufficient and word choice is adequate.
1 to 11 points
Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present.
Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word
choice is generally good.
0 points
Numerous spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors are present.
Writing style is difficult to understand and word choice is poor.
Structure
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Points Earned
Current APA Format Elements
14 to 15 points

4. Citations and format are in current APA style. Cover page,
bibliography, etc. are correctly formatted. Paper is double-
spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New
Roman font.
12 to 13 points
Citations and format are in current APA style with few errors.
Cover page, bibliography, etc. are present with few errors.
Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12
point Times New Roman font.
1 to 11 points
Citations and format are in current APA style, though several
errors are present. Cover page, bibliography, etc., are included,
though several errors are present. Paper is double-spaced, but
margins or font are incorrect.
0 points
Citations are not formatted correctly. Cover page, bibliography,
etc. are not included or formatted incorrectly. Paper is not
double-spaced, margins are incorrect, or font is incorrect.
Research Elements
14 to 15 points
At least 4–7 high quality primary and secondary sources are
utilized in a mature and effective manner. Research effectively
incorporates multiple nuanced viewpoints of complex issues.
Adequate number of sources (per assignment instructions) are
used. A complete and accurate bibliography is provided.
Arguments are correctly and effectively supported by research.
12 to 13 points
Primary and secondary sources of acceptable and appropriate
nature and quality are utilized. Research reflects multiple
viewpoints of complex issues. Adequate number of sources (Per
assignment instructions) are used. A complete and accurate
bibliography is provided. Arguments are acceptably supported
by research.
1 to 11 points
Fewer than the 4 sources of acceptable and appropriate nature

5. and quality are utilized. Research does not reflect multiple
viewpoints of complex issues. An incomplete or inaccurate
bibliography is provided. Arguments are tangentially supported
with research. Arguments incorporate research but often include
or rely upon personal opinion without appropriate support.
Sources are used inappropriately at times.
0 points
Appropriate sources are not used, or sources are lacking
entirely. Arguments are not supported by research. Opposing
viewpoints are dismissed or ignored. Bibliography is incomplete
or missing.
Total
/150
Instructor’s Comments:
Page 1 of 3
PADM 620
Administrative Memoranda Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Points Earned
Analysis of Material
27 to 29 points
All elements of the assigned topic are clearly and completely
addressed in light of 3–5-page limit. Analyses flow in a logical
and effective manner, address all elements of the assignment
thoroughly, and reach the nuances of the issues raised. Complex
issues are navigated with precision, clarity, and detail.
24 to 26 points
Major elements of the assigned topic are discussed in a

6. meaningful way, but the memorandum would benefit from
additional clarity, depth, or detail. Analyses are generally well
constructed and complex issues are recognized.
1 to 23 points
Some elements of the assigned topic are mentioned, but the
discussion is incomplete, unclear, superficial, too general, or
otherwise does not meet expectations. Analyses are general and
lacking in depth. Complex issues and nuances are overlooked.
0 points
Assigned elements are not discussed.
Organization
27 to 29 points
The memorandum is focused and well organized. The
memorandum has a clear thesis, and a clear and substantive
introduction and conclusion. The memorandum effectively uses
headings and subheadings as appropriate to focus and deepen
analyses.
24 to 26 points
The memorandum is reasonably well organized and follows a
logical path from idea to idea and section to section. The
memorandum includes an adequate introduction and conclusion.
1 to 23 points
The memorandum is in need of additional organization and
clarity. Ideas and/or sections of the memorandum either do not
flow logically, or are in need of fundamental improvement. The
memorandum is lacking an adequate introduction and/or
conclusion.
0 points
The memorandum lacks meaningful organization and an
introduction and conclusion.
Content
Advanced
Proficient
Developing

7. Not Present
Points Earned
Evaluation, Synthesis, and Adequate Use of Sources
27 to 29 points
Sources, concepts and ideas are evaluated critically and
synthesized in a manner that moves beyond restatement and
makes a valuable contribution to the assigned topic.
24 to 26 points
Sources are used correctly and support the memorandum’s
analyses and conclusions. Concepts and ideas are understood
and linked in a reasonable way that supports the memorandum’s
conclusions. Memorandum reflects a good familiarity with the
major ideas, but would benefit from greater critical evaluation
and synthesis.
1 to 23 points
Some sources are used, but are not critically evaluated and/or
not used in an effective manner. Memorandum would benefit
from a more substantive use of sources, more appropriate
reliance on sources, and/or better skill in evaluating,
synthesizing, or applying ideas, concepts, or sources.
0 points
Sources are not used; ideas and concepts from sources are not
evaluated or synthesized.
Structure
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Points Earned
Current APA Format Elements
11.25 to 12 points
Citations and format are in current APA style. Cover page,
bibliography, etc. are correctly formatted. Memorandum is
double-spaced with 1-inch margins and 12-point Times New
Roman font.

8. 10 to 11 points
Citations and format are in current APA style with few errors.
Cover page, bibliography, etc. are present with few errors.
Memorandum is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and 12
point Times New Roman font.
1 to 9 points
Citations and format are in current APA style, though several
errors are present. Cover page, bibliography, etc., are included,
though several errors are present. Memorandum is double-
spaced, but margins or font are incorrect.
0 points
Citations are not formatted correctly. Cover page, bibliography,
etc. are not included, or are formatted incorrectly. Memorandum
is not double-spaced, margins are incorrect, or font is incorrect.
Structure
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Points Earned
Mechanics
11.25 to 12 points
No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present.
Writing is precise and word choice is appropriate.
10 to 11 points
Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present.
Writing style is sufficient and word choice is adequate.
1 to 9 points
Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present.
Writing style is understandable, but could be improved. Word
choice is generally good.
0 points
Numerous spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors are present.
Writing style is difficult to understand and word choice is poor.

9. Research Elements
13 to 14 points
High quality primary and secondary sources are utilized in a
mature and effective manner. Research effectively incorporates
multiple nuanced viewpoints of complex issues. At least 2
scholarly sources are used (in addition to the course text,
assigned readings, and the Bible). A complete and accurate
bibliography is provided. Arguments are correctly and
effectively supported by research.
11.75 to 12.75 points
Primary and secondary sources of acceptable and appropriate
nature and quality are utilized. Research reflects multiple
viewpoints of complex issues. At least 2 scholarly sources are
used (in addition to the course text, assigned readings, and the
Bible) are used. A complete and accurate bibliography is
provided. Arguments are acceptably supported by research.
1 to 11.5 points
Fewer than 4 sources of an acceptable and appropriate nature
and quality are utilized. Research does not reflect multiple
viewpoints of complex issues. An incomplete or inaccurate
bibliography is provided. Arguments are only tangentially
supported by research. Arguments incorporate research, but
often include or rely upon personal opinion without appropriate
support. Sources are used inappropriately at times.
0 points
Appropriate sources are not used or are lacking entirely.
Arguments are not supported by research. Opposing viewpoints
are dismissed or ignored. Bibliography is incomplete or
missing.
Total
/125
Instructor’s Comments:
Page 2 of 3
PADM 620

10. Administrative Memorandum 1 Instructions
Read these instructions and the grading rubric carefully before
beginning your research paper. You are responsible to read and
understand these documents.
You are required to write a brief memorandum explaining and
contrasting the roles of government, citizens, businesses, and
nonprofits in traditional public administration with the roles of
those same entities in the context of the New Public
Management. You must include an evaluation in light of biblical
principles.
This is a graduate-level research assignment designed to test
your ability to conduct effective research, gain a nuanced
understanding of complex concepts, synthesize the ideas
reflected in your research with those reflected in your textbook
readings, and to evaluate and apply these ideas to an issue of
political economics.
As with all graduate-level assignments, you are expected to
comport yourself with the highest writing, research, and ethical
standards. To do well on this assignment, you must conduct
high-quality research and offer a rich, well-supported analysis;
mere opinion or conjecture will not suffice.
You must avoid careless or simple grammatical errors such as
misspellings, incomplete sentences, comma splices, faulty
noun/verb agreement, etc. Such errors will result in substantial
point deductions.
Plagiarism in any form is strictly prohibited and may result in
failure of the assignment, failure of the course, and/or removal
from the program. It is your responsibility to ensure that you
fully understand what constitutes the various forms of
plagiarism and to avoid all forms of plagiarism.
This research paper must be 3–5 pages (not including title page,
reference page, and any appendices). This paper must be in
current APA format with 1-inch margins, 12-pt Times New
Roman font, and must include a title page and reference page.
You must include citations to at least 2 scholarly sources (in
addition to the course textbooks, assigned readings, and the

11. Bible) to fully support your assertions and conclusions.
Submit Administrative Memoranda 1 by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on
Sunday of Module/Week 4.
PADM 620
Assignment 2:Statesmanship and Ethics Instructions
Read all instructions and the grading rubric carefully before
beginning your research paper. You are responsible for reading
and understood these documents.
For this assignment you will write a 5–7-page research paper
focusing on the role of statesmanship and ethics in public
administration. Specifically, you must explain 1) the role
statesmanship should play in modern public administration; 2)
how the issue of ethics is approached in public administration;
and 3) how these matters may be evaluated in light of biblical
principles.
This is a graduate-level research assignment designed to test
your ability to conduct effective research, gain a nuanced
understanding of complex concepts, synthesize the ideas
reflected in your research with those reflected in your textbook
readings, and to evaluate and apply these ideas to an issue of
political economics.
As with all graduate-level assignments, you are expected to
comport yourself with the highest writing, research, and ethical
standards. To do well on this assignment, you must conduct
high-quality research and offer a rich, well-supported analysis;
mere opinion or conjecture will not suffice.
You must avoid careless or simple grammatical errors such as
misspellings, incomplete sentences, comma splices, faulty
noun/verb agreement, etc. Such errors will result in substantial
point deductions.
Plagiarism in any form is strictly prohibited and may result in
failure of the assignment, failure of the course, and/or removal
from the program. It is your responsibility to ensure that you
fully understand what constitutes the various forms of

12. plagiarism and to avoid all forms of plagiarism.
This research paper must be 5–7 pages (not including title page,
reference page, and any appendices). This paper must be in
current APA format with 1-inch margins, 12-pt Times New
Roman font, and must include a title page and reference page.
You must include citations to at least 4–7 appropriate sources
(in addition to the course textbooks, assigned readings, and the
Bible) to fully support your assertions and conclusions.
Submit Assignment 2: Statesmanship and Ethics by 11:59 p.m.
(ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 3.