Legal Alert - Vietnam - First draft Decree on mechanisms and policies to enco...
Coastal zone cadastral land "high water mark" Whittal "integrated coastal management" icma amendment bill_sagi aug_2013
1. THE ICMA 24 OF 2008 AMENDMENT BILL
– SAGI UPDATE
Jennifer WHITTAL, Geomatics, UCT
2. ICMA Amendment Bill definition
by the substitution for the definition of ‘‘high-water
mark’’ of the following definition:
‘‘ ‘high-water mark’ means the highest line reached
by coastal waters,
but excluding any line reached as a result of—
(a) exceptional or abnormal [floods or storms that
occur no more
than once in ten years] weather or sea conditions;
or
(b) an estuary being closed to the sea;’’
3. Estuaries
Definition of estuary open to the
sea and closed to the sea:
Legal vs environmental definitions
Critical for defining the HWM and
set backs such as CPZ extents
Unless there is a definition which
will stand up in boundary law, I suggest:
Open estuary: an estuary which has been open to the sea for
any period of time in the previous 10 year period
Closed estuary: an estuary which has not been open to the
sea in the previous 10 year period
4. Erosion and accretion
There will no longer be replacement of curvilinear
HWM boundaries with fixed straight line boundaries
Natural erosion and accretion will now still occur
with the moving HWM boundary
As in river boundary movement, this is not a land transfer,
therefore not alienation of coastal public property
HWM and straight line bounded land can lose land to the
sea
HWM land can gain land by accretion without limit
Straight line land can only gain land which was landward
of the straight line at grant
6. Coastal Protection
Zone in Fish Hoek
Flood Prone areas
61 land units, 15 fully inside
Agricultural zoning/not zoned/not
township or urban within 1000m of
HWM
10 land units, 9 fully inside
Areas within 100 m of HWM
219 land units, 151 fully inside
Total 290 land units in the CPZ
Only 175 fully inside
7. Counter arguments to comments made at
portfolio committee hearings:
Argument to include the 1:10 year storms again
Coastal land will be lost compared to the Sea Shore definition land ownership
Is the intention to increase the sea shore, or to manage coastal development?
Workshop discussions - failure to enforce the existing legislation (people building
below the HWM or preventing access to the sea shore) is the issue - it does not
require a change in the position of the HWM.
1:10 year storm evidence is not visible on the ground for long
the physical evidence is essentially the "monument/beacon" which is used by Joe Public to
ascertain when he/she is on the sea shore as opposed to private land
little evidence for surveyors or others to locate the position on the ground as required by law -
surveys cannot wait until this storm event
8. Counter arguments to comments made at
portfolio committee hearings:
Contented that without the 1:10 included, that the HWM moves instantaneously
with the high water.
No, under the Sea Shore Act, the position was defined annually and coincident with usual
meteorological, weather (storm) and astronomical (spring tide) effects.
Now, under the proposed amendment bill, all but the exceptional events are included.
This, by implication, includes expected meteorological, weather (storm) and astronomical
(spring tide) effects - these effects may not coincide annually, but are likely to coincide
every two or three years, I would think.
Evidence will most likely remain visible on the shoreline from which the person (be it the
surveyor or Joe Public) can ascertain the most likely position of the legal HWM.
9. Counter arguments to comments made at
portfolio committee hearings:
It was put to the PC that land ownership is possible up to the middle
of an estuary.
no – never has been – estuaries are below the HWM and are part of coastal
waters
where the river ends and the estuary begins – that is rather the question
Contention that the moving HWM results in alienation of CPP land
which is prohibited:
fluid river boundary: land unit and hence the ownership is ager non-limitatus and
unconstrained in area . When the boundary moves there is no transfer. Area can
change without alienation taking place.
sea-shore and coastal HWM boundary land parcels are ager non-limitatus
My name is Jenny Whittal – academic member of staff in Geomatics at the University of Cape Town. Thank you for the opportunity to address this committee on the Amendment Bill to the ICMA.
Much clearer
1:10 year removed
I am still unclear as to the legal meaning of estuaries closed and open to the sea. I understand that there is an environmental classification of all SA estuaries, but this is not a legal definition or classification. Clarification is critically important as the sea shore may extend way inland for an open estuary and not for a closed estuary. Land bordering on estuaries is often of high value and this is likely to be contested if not clarified here. My suggestion is as follows:
Open estuary: an estuary which has been open to the sea for any period of time in the previous 10 year period – this would therefore include those temporarily open to the sea and those permanently open to the sea
Closed estuary: an estuary which has not been open to the sea in the previous 10 year period
5
The inclusion of some land units may cast the CPZ far into the interior and way beyond what could be considered the coastal environment. Some land parcels have sections close to the coast, but are very large and the whole land unit is then burdened as being part of the CPZ.
This is likely to occur due to
16(d) which includes the whole of a land unit where any part of this falls within 1km of the HWM (rural land) and
16(e) 100m from the HWM (urban land).
16(i) which includes any land unit adjacent to a 100 year flood/storm event
Is the intention to include such parcels into the CPZ? What about parcels only partially falling in this zone – follow cadastral boundaries?
Some questions remain, and I suppose we will find our way with the new legislation over time. But I am very grateful for the opportunity to engage with the Dept of Environmental Affairs and Tourism in regards to the Act, the Bill and the effect on property boundaries, and this Bill has gone a long way to allaying my fears with the implementation of the Act as it currently stands.