1. The seven deadly sins of
librarianship
Jo Webb
By Pieter Brueghel (http://gnozis.info/?q=node/2792) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
2. 1. Lust
• The pleasures of the
flesh, including:
– A desire for money and
power.
– Living only in the present
• A focus on meeting our
own needs and wants,
not those of our users.
• Lack of planning
By The original uploader was Grammaticus VII at English Wikipedia (Original text: Anonymous) (13th century manuscript) [Public domain], via WikimediaCommons
3. 2. Gluttony
• Over-indulgence and
over-consumption to
the point of waste.
• In LIS:
– too much information
– no prioritising
• In policy and in teaching
Sebastian Brant [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
4. 3. Avarice
• Rapacious desire for
and pursuit of material
possessions
• For librarianship:
– Our sense of value and
status
– Doing everything
– Collections without
access
– Refusal to collaborate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Carving_on_exterior_of_Lincoln_Cathedral_%281%29.JPG
5. 4. Sloth
• Spiritual or emotional
apathy, wasting due to
lack of use
– Lack of action
– Lack of expertise
• Failure to learn and
develop
• Failure to act
Hieronymus Wierix [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
6. 5. Wrath
• Love of justice
perverted to revenge
and spite
• Excessive adherence to
rules
• Inflexibility
• No tolerance of
ambiguity and
uncertainty
By Peter Paul Rubens ([1]) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
7. 6. Envy
• ‘A sad or resentful
covetousness towards
the traits or possessions
of someone else.’
• Jealousy of other
professions and their
perceived status
Giotto [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
8. 7. Pride
• Being better or more
important than others
• False professionalism
• ‘I can do anything’
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kellymcpherson/27115230165
9. 1. ‘Castitas’ and plan for the future
• ‘Purity, knowledge and
wisdom’
• Learn and question your
practice
• Focus on values
• Build your evidence
base
• Big-picture and strategic
thinking
• Avoid faddishness
Giotto [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
10. 2. ‘Temperance’ – set priorities
• Link plans to priorities
• Be aware of your
environment
• Manage the present
• Consider the needs of
your stakeholders
• Take action
Piero del Pollaiolo [Publicdomain], via Wikimedia Commons
11. 3. ‘Caritas’ - service
• Ranganathan:
1. Books are for use.
2. Every reader his / her book.
3. Every book its reader.
4. Save the time of the reader.
5. The library is a growing organism.
• What is your mission? And vision?
And do you follow this?
• Understand your organization
and how it operates:
• What and where are costs?
• Do we create barriers to meeting
our purpose? What are they?
Lucas Cranach the Elder [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
12. 4. Countering sloth through diligence
• ‘Persistence, fortitude,
effort and ethics’
• Challenge yourself, your
practice and your
organization
• CPD learning and change
• Reflective/reflexive
practice
• Engage with academic
literature
• Professional engagement
By Jan Saenredam after Hendrik Goltzius (British Museum) [Public domain], <a
href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AThree_virtues_Diligentia.jpg">viaWikimedia
Commons</a>
13. 5. Patience
• ‘Showing forgiveness and
being merciful’
• Focus on laws/principles
rather than rules
• Question
• Understand user
experience
• Recognizing ambiguity
and uncertainty
• Flexibility to create
positive outcomes and
constructive relationships
Andreas F. Borchert [CC BY-SA 3.0 de (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/deed.en), CC BY-SA
4.0-3.0-2.5-2.0-1.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0-3.0-2.5-2.0-1.0) or GFDL
(http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html)], via Wikimedia Commons
14. 6. Combat envy with kindness
• Michael Gorman, Our enduring
values:
– Stewardship
– Service
– Intellectual Freedom
– Privacy
– Rationalism
– Commitment to literacy and
learning
– Equity of access
– Democracy
Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=628151
15. 7. The end of false pride
• What is a profession?
• Celebrate our
distinctiveness and our
strengths
• Collaborate
• Boundaries can limit
but also define in a
positive way.
By Kathleen de la Peña McCook [CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)], via Wikimedia
Commons
16. Jo Webb FCLIP FRSA FHEA
National Teaching Fellow
Visiting Fellow, University of East London
@jwebbery
jwebbery@gmail.com
Domenico di Michelino [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
Editor's Notes
Conferences are a time for reflection and review; an opportunity to remove oneself from the interruptions of daily life, the crises so often focused on the behaviours of individuals or technology, and find a time to step back to review and reflect.
We do this in what are often convivial surroundings, in a culture of openness and sharing, and thus seek clarity and enlightenment
Sometimes though I fear conferences serve as opportunities to reinforce what we know and believe, or perhaps what we desire to be true. We hear and accept fewer discordant voices in our profession, and although we are more accepting of difference and diversity, all too often we fear to disagree. I am not making any particulalry radical claims in this talk, but I hope it provides some food for thought, by exploring some issues in a slightly different ways.
But first of all some background. I come from a Roman Catholic background, and went to a RC primary schools, where I learnt the catechism: to enumerate the seven deadly sins and the blessings of the Holy Spirit, [more examples] I then studied rather a lot of medieval history, and was especially interested in the C12th renaissance, heresy and scholasticism, and I did a special paper on Dante and Petrarch.
The middle ages formed our idea of universities, of a collegiate community of scholars, seeking knowledge and sharing learning. It also formed our understanding of a profession. Initially this meant a declaration to holy orders,and of course, universities existed for the education of those in holy orders. In time, profession developed other meanings, and emerged into the definition relevant for us today of an occupation defined by the application of a shared body of knowledge and shared values, possessing barriers to entry and practice and some regulation. So, I would suggest, our notion of a profession is derived from the clerical obligations of university study.
I might also add, without wishing to sound pompous that there should be an element of altruism in our commitment to service as librarians, that suits various definitions of profession.
Sins are specific acts of commission or omission
The clumiest of my analalogies. Rather than referring to sex in the stacks or other inappropriate behaviour, I will define lust for librarians as
Doing everything
Collections without access
Refusal to collaborate