Oppressed People Essay

Oppressed People Essay
The Oppressed People of Burma
Burma, like many other Southeast Asian nations, is a land of much culture and diversity of ethnic groups. Unfortunately, unlike the people of other
nations, the people of Burma have been stripped of their human rights. Since the military junta had overtaken the Burmese government in 1988, the
people of Burma have been among the most oppressed people in the world. The continuation of the government's brutality has caught the attention of
many outside nations around the world who increasingly have been intervening in Burma's issues to help its people. As these occurrences are a major
issue for the people of Burma, these problems are not restricted to its boundaries. They are also becoming a problem for ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Before that time, they had been a British colony since 1885. After fourteen years as an independent country, they removed their government in 1962
and finally adopted a new constitution in 1974, becoming a socialist republic. Shortly thereafter in 1988, the country's welfare turned into a brutal
military government and the military established a State Law and Order Resolution Council (SLORC) to govern the country. Finally, in 1989 the
country's name changed from Burma to Myanmar, a name change that would parallel a change in the way the people of Burma would appreciate their
lives prior to 1988.
The Problem
Ever since Burma's government turned into a military power, the devastation that the people have had to endure has led to intense oppression. This
has become a problematic issue for Burma including its neighboring countries such as Thailand. The government has acted inhumanely towards its
people. The oppressive acts include forced unpaid labor among its people, including its children and the elderly. Specifically, children have been
forced to labor in the fields of beans, bricks, chilies, corn, pineapple, rice, rubber, sugarcane, and teak. Also, the government has also forced nearly
half a million of its people to move from their homes so that various projects of construction and resource extraction can be conducted. An example of
such a project is
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Genocide In Burma
The Proposed Solution to the Genocide in Burma
The Rohingya or the minority group in Burma, have been persecuted by the mainly Buddhist majority since the 11th century. According to Wikipedia,
King Bayinnaung of Burma, one of the country's earliest kings, prevented and persecuted any Rohingya Muslims from celebrating prominent Islamic
holidays such as Eid–ul Adha and Eid–ul Fitr. The following Burmese king, King Bodawpaya, butchered four of the Rohingya's high–ranking religious
leaders for not consuming pork, which is strictly against Islamic Sharia law. In 2012, events escalated when 166 Muslim Rohingya were massacred
due to violence between the two groups ("Persecution of," n.d.). This Muslim Minority group has been on the agenda of government ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
This strategic power move targets a country's population. Social sanctions, such as banning popular American and European websites (Google,
Twitter, Facebook, etc.) can impede the progress of a nation's citizens causing them to be years behind the rest of the world. Another example of
social sanctions is prohibiting a country from international competition, such as the World Cup or the Olympics, similar to the occurrence in South
Africa when it was bared from the Olympics and World Cup due to their racist apartheid regime. These sanctions can technologically deprive a nation
of most developments. If a nation is technologically deprived, it cannot compete with other countries due to lack of sufficient knowledge. It also
keeps its citizens enclosed in a theoretical bubble, disconnecting them from the rest of the world. This is problematic for Burma's government, a nation
cannot advance into the future, if its people are still affixed, lingering to the past. If there is no growth in knowledgeable professionals, Burma's
officials will take notice and realize that it is not in their best interest nor its citizens, to remain deadlocked in the past and will hopefully terminate its
regime on the Rohingya

Myanmar, Better Known To The Rest Of The World As Burma,
Myanmar, better known to the rest of the world as Burma, is a basic country arranged in Southeast Asia. It was at one time a prosperous country and
now is one of the poorest countries on the planet today. As showed by Thadithil, this is an ordered history of the events: "In 1886, Burma transformed
into a district of English India. 1936, Burma separates from India. 1942, Japan invaded Burma. 1945, the Anti–Fascist Freedom League, drove by Aung
San, deceives Japan, and helps allies reoccupy Burma. 1947, the Burmese won their freedom, Aung San wins the fundamental race yet was murdered
during a meeting of the Executive Council (Maung). 1948, U Nu ends up being the Prime Minister. 1976, Ethnic freedom groups continue to revolt and
finally ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Her two children are natives of the UK and were seldom let see her.
In spite of the fact that she was bound to her home, she tried to affirm her basic rights, to oppose the authorities, and to go outside Yangon. This
sometimes–incited pompous experiences in odd conditions, for instance, her being held for a couple of days on a bridge on the edges of Yangon in
1998 and again in 2000, and being denied a ticket on a train to Mandalay in 2000, which was the reason she was returned to home confinement in
August 2000 (Wilson). It 's difficult to conceive how exhaustively and brutally she was kept secluded from her own people and the rest of the world by
the Myanmar authorities. Most of the time, the only communication she had was a short–wave radio so she could tune into BBC. She didn 't have
access to the telephone. NLD Headquarters had a telephone, however, more often than not, it was out and the authorities did their best to keep her far
from there. She didn 't have admittance to the web and/or satellite broadcasts until after her discharge from detainment in late 2010.
Suu Kyi 's philosophy is that individuals merit the opportunity to pick their own fates, and non–violent ways of justice. Although she was very young
when Aung San was murdered, everything that she had learned about him was of his sacrificial strength and a solid confidence in a free and law
based Burma (Suu Kyi, Aris, Havel, and

Effects Of Decolonization Of Burma
Alexey Skyban (14201708)
Intro International Politics
13 October 2014
Unwillingness to do what is Right
Decolonization after 1945 undoubtedly caused more harm than good. Inevitably, colonized countries across the globe would have eventually requested
sovereignty. Today, many decolonized countries are beginning to prosper and flourish; however, their path to such a state was long and challenging.
The fluke in decolonization was not that it happened, but the way it did. Only concerned with self–interest and prosperity domestically, European
Empires were blinded to the consequences of abandoning their colonies without any guidance or support. Poor decolonization of Burma resulted in
widespread oppression, downfall of the economy, and violation of human rights. Britain left Burma with a very weak government unable to control its
own country. As a result, the democratic government was overthrown and a ruthless tyrant rose to power.
Before British rule, Burma was a wealthy, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The new government was continuously challenged by communists and under–represented ethnic groups. Home to one of the largest diversity of ethnic
groups, it was extremely challenging to please all. With demands of, "protection of ethnic culture, language, and religion, the devolution of tangible
executive, legislative, and judicial power to the ethnic states within a true federal union, and a democratic form of government" (ConflictMap.org) not
met, the ethnic groups turned to violence. As a result, Burma experienced intense periods of civil war which devastated and destabilized the country
even further. As the economy collapsed, U Nu was forced out of office by GeneralNe Win in order to "restore law and order". U Nu was re–elected in
February 1960, but two years later on March 2nd 1962, Ne Win seized power in a coup d'Г©tat and proclaimed himself to be Burma's new military

The Ten Stages of Genocide by Gregory H. Stanton
Did you know that today there are still acts of genocide happening around the world? "The Ten Stages of Genocide" is an article written by Gregory H.
Stanton, the president of Genocide Watch, an organization that is fighting to end genocide. In this article, Stanton lists ten stages that will occur in a
genocide, starting with the stage of classification and ending with the stage of denial. In Burma, a sovereign state, also known as Myanmar, a minority
ethnic group named the Rohingya is being discriminated by the majority of the population and the government in Burma. The Rohingya have been
denied Burmese citizenship since 1982, when a law was enacted by the state government that excludes the Rohingya as one of Burma's ethnic groups
("Myanmar Will Not Recognize"). There has also been reports of ethnic cleansing, anti–Muslim violence, and forced labor ("Plight"). Because the
Burmese government refuses to recognize the Rohingya Muslims as one of their official national races and denies the Rohingya of their rights, the
United Nations and Gregory Stanton, president of Genocide Watch, recognize the ethnic discrimination of this group as a growing problem. The United
Nations strives to stop the mistreatment of the Rohingya, and Genocide Watch declares that Rakhine State in Burma is in a state of genocide
emergency, going through the ten stages of genocide. Because of the cruel treatment of the Muslim Rohingya people in Burma, the United Nations and
Gregory Stanton are calling

Essay on Multilateral Intervention within ASEAN
The admission of Burma into ASEAN and the reluctance of ASEAN to resolve Burma's ongoing political turmoil (the most recent, 2010 elections) have
sparked off much debate and controversy among the member states as well as the international community. This is because ASEAN upheavals the
non–interference principle in managing its inter–relations, indicating lack of credibility, importance and unity. Therefore, this policy memo will suggest
some short and long term strategies that will re–orientate political and economic change in Burma in accordance to ASEAN's interest.
Interest ASEAN
Firstly, the reputation of ASEAN is closely linked to the measures that should be taken to resolve Burma's current political turmoil. ASEAN has been...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Regional Stake Holders
United States
The United States are negotiating on free trade agreements (TIFA) with ASEAN, though the negotiations are relatively inactive due to some
hindrances such as lack of transparency, large amount of bureaucratic paperwork to do business, especially in Burma (Aung Zwa) inequality
(preferential policies) barring foreigners from the lucrative public procurement sector practiced by some member states of ASEAN (Lee Hock Guan).
Besides that on the foreign policy and security front, the United States realizes the importance of ASEAN in facilitating to materialize its interest, to
contain the rising of China and thus to remain as the hegemonic power in South East Asia. ASEAN is also playing as a key partner in combating
against terrorism. This is because some Islamic extremist groups which are linked to Al–Qaeda had been using ASEAN countries to meet up for their
attacks.
China Firstly, there has been an influx of assistance, trade and investment from China to Burma. This can be seen as in just ten years, trade between
Burma and China grew from US$15million to US$800 million. For instance, from 1991 to 1995, about $US740 million of approximately US$1 billion
in arms purchased by Burma came from China. Therefore, China maintains a good relation with Burma because Burma had been importing its military
hardware. Secondly,

Burm A Military Dictatorship Country For Many Years
Burma used to be a military dictatorship country for several years. The military dictatorship system was initially led by General Ne Win, who ruled the
country with brutality since 1962. In 1974, the government forced people to approve a new constitution for establishing a one–party (Burma Socialist
Program Party or BSPP) government with 415 members. General Ne Win changed the name of the country to the Socialist Republic of the Union of
Burma. They held a one–party election and General Ne Win turned into Chairman of the State Council and President of Burma U Ne Win. However,
the military junta was still controlling. Burma's economy were facing bankruptcy by 1987 (Background Information). As people suffered from the
extreme political ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
She gave a speech to the masses of people who were gathering at Shwedagon Pagoda in Rangoon. In September, during the congress meeting, a
multi–party system was voted by 75% of the representatives. However, the BSPP turned down the changes. The protests kept going and the army
and police forces also began to support the protestors (The protests of "8888"). Using excessive brutal measures, the Burmese military made the
protests stop and took the power again on September 18, 1988. General Saw Maung abolished the 1974 constitution and established the "State Law
and Order Restoration Council(SLORC)". However, in 1997, the SLORC was broken down and changed to the State Peace and Development
Council (SPDC) which continued to rule until 2010 by General Than Shwe. National League for Democracy (NLD) party was one of the notable
political parties in 1988 and 1989. It was led by Aung San Suu Kyi. Since she was very popular like today, the SLORC put her under house arrest in
July 1989 (Background Information). The government made her remain under house arrest in Rangoon for six years. In May 1990, the free and fair
multi–party election was held. Although NLD leader was under house arrest, they won "392 of 485 parliamentary seats (or 80% of the seats)".
Nevertheless, "The SLORC refused to transfer power to the NLD claiming that transfer of power to a civilian government could not happen

The Political Engagement Of Burma
As Burma seeks to distance itself from China, despite Burma's failed engagement on the energy front, India may very well be destined to be the major
beneficiary. Burma has been grateful that India has focused on education, provision of technology and services, and infrastructure just as much as it has
focused on energy (Maini, 2014). With all things considered, China virtually has monopoly over Burma's offshore gas fields. Its economic and political
engagement in Burma is greater than any other country in the world beyond comparison.
Tribal Rights Approximately 33% of Burma's population consists of tribal groups. The population ranges from the Wa and Kachins in the North, to the
Chins in the Northwest, to the Rohingya Muslims with ties ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Contrary to popular belief, the tribes are weary of Burma becoming a democracy too soon. "Suu Kyi is little more than a symbol of the wrong issue –
democracy first! Ethnic rights and the balance of ethnic power are preconditions for democracy (Kaplan, 2011). The granddaughter of famous military
general Aung San, Aung San Suu Kyi, has led Burma's National League of Democracy. India has a strong relationship with Suu Kyi, as India
supported Burma's democracy leader prior to changing its policy to engagement with the regime. Suu Kyi studied in India, won the Nehru Award for
International Peace in 1982, and her family has strong ties to Jawaharlal Nehru (Myint–U, 2011). Although Suu Kyi and the tribes are against the same
military, their visions for the order are different by which a transition to a civilian government must to occur. The major concern of the tribes is their
rights through a federation that grants them self–rule. Suu Kyi specifically desires elections, with less regard for the distinctive approach that will be
necessary in order to satisfy the tribes. India and Suu Kyi have distanced from each other, creating an opportunity for India to advocate for the tribes.
The tribes may very well look to India as a model to follow given India's own form of

Burma American Revolution
Burma is located in southeastern Asia and bordered by the Bay of Bengal to the south, Bangladesh and India to the north, China, Thailand, and Laos to
the east. Today it is known as Myanmar and is home to more than 100 ethnic groups. Yangon is one of the largest cities in the country with the
well–known temple of Shwedagon Pagoda, which houses many beautiful Buddhist relics. However, prior to this, Burma was actually a colony of
Britain and suffered many human rights violations on the path to independence. Burma fought with the British in 1945 to prevent Japanese invaders
from entering Burma during World War II. Aung San, leader of an anti
–fascist movement popular since the struggle in Japan, built a military and
political base to negotiate with Britain. According to Dulcinea, he was temporarily in charge of the government which stirred conflicts in Burmese
ethnic groups, yet he proved to unify the nationalist movement. Fortunately, San signed a deal granting Burma independence from the British in 1947.
However before the deal went into full swing, San and cabinet members were assassinated. These mournful deaths halted the advancement towards
independence. In the midst of the 1988 unrest, Aung San Suu Kyi, daughter of Aung Sun, returned to Burma to care for her mother. She remained in
Burma due to her sudden interest in politics. On... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The governmental effort to threaten the black market led to problems such as the change in currency and wiping out savings of people that could not
document the transfer of money to them. What troubled the people the most was that they could not find what they needed in prices they could afford.
Based on Asian Survey, the military also stepped in to help in 1988 by trying to increasing distribution of products but it only added to the distress of
the people and the chaos the

The Causes Of Genocide Against The Rohingya
Rejected peoples in South Asia have been subjected ethnic cleansing as a result of newly formed nation states throughout the 20th century. Since before
Burma's independence in 1947, it is no exception. The first reports of ethnic cleansing in Burma were as early as 1978 after the Burmese military had
attempted to deport the ethnic minority known as the Rohingya in neighboring Bangladesh. Since then the situation has entered a continued spiral of
alleged state–sponsored oppression against the Rohingya. The warning signs of genocide against the Rohingya is becoming ever so increasing at a
rapid rate over the last decade. In May 2015, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum issued a report stating that the deep concern that "so
many preconditions for genocide are already in place." On the 6th of February 2017, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights officially
classified that the violence against the Rohingya could be a genocide.
This conflict spans multiple generations of Burmese with a deep seeded hatred towards the Rohingya, and creates questions that would help understand
the root causes for the Rohingya genocide. Why are the both the ethnic majority and the government in Myanmar, so driven to commit genocide on the
Rohingya minority? The answer to this question is asserted by examining the economic circumstances in the country.Burma has faced extreme
underdevelopment and corruption post the military junta takeover in 1962. The difficult economic circumstances in the state of Myanmar are the
primary driving force for the majority to commit genocide on the Rohingya by what they view as the most rational solution to better their economic
circumstances. In order to illustrate this assertion and draw conclusions from it, we must analyze the major economic risk factors and warning signs
that have been prevalent in Burmese history since the British colonial period. This paper will first outline who the Rohingya people are, their origins,
and their significance to Burmese history. Secondly, the economic situation in Myanmar as well as the logic of understanding this atrocity from an
economic circumstance. Lastly, the response and treatment by the military and ethnic majority towards the Rohingya will be

Miss Burma Symbolism
In the town of Burma, where militarism, violence and racial differences took place, two people from different ethnicities discovered how to love even
through the hardships of social acceptance and language barriers. This couple was symbolic of the Burman society through the aspects of social
interactions and political revolution. The novel Miss Burma has a much deeper meaning to it than just the human life story. Many would say the
symbolism is a key feature in this novel and one must interpret the provided information ever so carefully to execute the overall meaning. This isn't just
another "forbidden romance" novel like Romeo and Juliet, Charmaine's reasoning and meaning behind her words provide that extra boost to grabbing
the reader's attention. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This conflict associates with the quote, "It's not anyone else's country." (10) By this, Charmaine Craig is presenting patriotism for their country and
the impact that'll occur in their country. As stated in the previous text, Burmans have a way of life that is culturally acceptable to marry someone of
their alike kind. To connect this occurrence with real life knowledge, this was also a worldwide issue back in historic times. The love between a
Burman lady, Khin, and a Jewish man, Benny, was politically revolutionary in a way that altered the Burman views of society, culture, and beliefs.
Referring back to patriotism, the book's threshold starts off with the original Burman mindset – if one is a Burman, they will marry a Burman. This sets
the tone for the exposition to allow change to occur throughout the rising action, climax, and falling action. In these three categories, mini conflicts pop
up here and there. For example, in the rising action, when Khin and Benny commence to know each other, their language barrier restricted particular
interactions – like conversation. Their talking was minimal, they had totally different languages, and it eventually led to foreshadowing how their
marriage followed through. Although this was a huge conflict with them, they made things work and found their love for one another to be an escape
from loneliness and the bigger issue of

Analysis Of George Orwell 's ' The Elephant '
George Orwell began the essay with his perspective on British domination. He stated that it is evil and alongside of that it is oppressive. He felt
hatred and guilt toward himself and the Burmese people. The people of Burma did not feel threatened because the narrator of the story had killed the
elephant. The Burmese people have lost their dignity and integrity while trying to fight off the British imperialism. Orwell uses allegories to describe
his experience of the British imperialism and he had his own view of the matter of slaying the elephant. He successfully used ethos, pathos, and logos
by attracting the audience to read his story. He had to make a scene in the story to make the people of Burma feel the same emotion. The elephant was
the one reason why it makes this story emotional. He used logos to show that he can kill the elephant even if he does not want to so that it does not
make him look fool.
Logos is used to show logic and persuade an audience by reason. When the author talks about the irony and the reality of imperialism, he compares
himself to the figure of a sahib. The comparison to the sahib is a term that was used to name aristocratic rulers. It is an important symbol of their
cultural image. British imperialism is a hostile environment and does not justify exploitation by controlling the Burmese people. The story sets the tone
of the author's story to be un–comforting. This story shows his flaws and how he taunts others, even his own people of Burma.

The Political Problems Of Burma
Burma, also known as Myanmar, has been independent since 1948 and is involved in one of the world's longest on–going civil war. The British and
Japanese occupation from 1924 to 1948 exacerbated tensions between ethnic groups. The country is also characterised by its unstable political regime,
mainly military ones, and its diverse ethnic background. The main ethnic group are the Bamar and occupy 60% of the land (Laoutsides and Ware,
2016). But no less than 135 ethnicities occupy the 40% left. Identity in the country is seen as the main explanation as to why the country cannot solve
its political problems and is in constant conflict. We can wonder however to what extent can the conflict be understood by solely focusing on identity.
If identity is an important factor in the emergence of tensions it is only one facet of the problem. Alternative theories to the identity explanation on the
causes of civil war are polarised between grievance and greed theories (Ballentine and Nitzschke, 2003). However, it is possible to have a complete
understanding of the causes and dynamics of ethnic conflict when combining these two set of theories together. Conflict arises from the grievance of
an ethnic group but is then maintained by the actors' greed.
First, we will see the limits of identity theory in explaining ethnic conflicts using the example of Burma. Then we will see how grievances can initiate
conflict and how the greed theory explains why it then persists. Finally, we will apply our

Shooting An Elephant
George Orwell's short story, "Shooting an Elephant", demonstrates the harsh environment, and survivalist mode that the people of Burma are in. The
Burmese people had been unjustly seized over, the British Empire was crumbling therefore they invaded the space around them. The narrator starts
preparing the essay manifesting his perspective on British Imperialism. He claims that it is evil and he is contradicting the oppressors. Although he is a
British officer in Burma, he feels a certain hatred and guilt towards himself, the empire, and the "evil–spirited little beasts," (Orwell) the Burmese
people. The people of Burma despised British and were not afraid to exhibit their feelings. But were quick to call on the narrator when trouble arose.
George ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He was chained up on a daily basis. Thai elephants are working animals, the elephant therefore resembles, in his servant–to–master relation, the native
Burman who was enrolled into the service of the British Empire. (Wilson and Lazzari) The elephant was over worked and the narrator describes how
older male elephants experience a session of musk and are chained up until it has passed. In this case the elephant was strong enough to break the chain
he was put on, lead his master in the wrong direction and trail heavily into town. The elephant raged around the town, destroying everything in its path,
including houses, farms, and even a Burmese man. The elephant symbolized how the British used their power and dominance to overpower the smaller
countries. It used its power to panic the town. The number of shot that were fired by the narrator, resemble that small pieces of himself that were
emitted from his conscious. Each of the shots were to kill the animal who was resembling the imperialism, but were also the hate and resentment the
narrator was emitting. And eventually the institution that destroys both the oppressor and the oppressed won. In its final moments, the elephant very
much resembles a human victim, which is no doubt what drives the narrator to flee before the agonized animal has died (Wilson and

Imperialism in Burma
Burma: a country of exceptional beauty, abundant natural resources, valuable minerals, fertile soil, and one of the healthiest climates in the tropics.
Britain desired these features, so they imperialized the whole country in 1885 and imposed colonial rule throughout Burma. Imperialism is... The
British benefit and hurt the country in many ways, completely changing the country forever. Westernimperialism in Burma was more costly than
beneficial; even though the British improved and modernized education, transportation, and daily life, they also destroyed the economy, culture, and
religion, ultimately causing more harm than good by dividing the country, killing many natives, and scarring the country forever. The British greatly
weakened politics in Burma. When the British invaded Burma, troops burned down villages and suppressed dissent with mass executions. British
colonial rule used the principle of 'divide and rule.' 'Divide and rule' divided the country into separate areas based on nationality. The colonial
administration relied heavily on Indian bureaucrats to impose their interests. The British ended Burma's monarchy and sent their king Thibaw into exile
because he provoked a dispute with a British timber company. Britain wanted control of Burma to protect its possessions in India and to gain a land
route to China. The British incorporated Burma into India, and Burma became known as 'Further India.' The British imposed colonial rule in 1886; the
Burmese

Myanmar: A Nation in Crisis Essay
Myanmar: A Nation in Crisis
The nation of Myanmar, also known as Burma, is currently under the rule of a ruthless totalitarian regime, guilty of numerous human rights violations
and target of intense international criticism. Located in Southeast Asia, on the western border of Thailand and Laos, it has been under military rule
since World War II.Burma is mired in socioeconomic crisis stemming from the rule of the military junta, and the citizens are suffering. The
environment of Burma is being destroyed, the people are treated inhumanely, and the country is notorious for its contribution to global narcotics. The
paragraphs below detail the current situations facing the country, why they came about, and the parties that are to blame for ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Eventually the Toungoo dynasty emerged in the 16th century, and the country was unified under a single Burmese state. The dynasty fell in 1752 after
years of invasion, clashes with the Portuguese, and ultimately a Mon rebellion.
The rebellion gave way to the Kongbaung dynasty, which did restore Burmese control over the country. There was a great deal of friction and
eventually full–fledged fighting between the Kongbaung dynasty and the British, particularly over the coastal province of Arakan. This tension gave
way to the First Anglo–Burmese war in the early 19th century, after which the British gained control of Arakan as well as the province of Tenasserim.
The Second Anglo–Burmese War in 1852 gave the British near complete control of Burma, and it was annexed as a British Colony in 1885. Although
it required the suppression of various uprisings and widespread dissent, British rule actually helped modernize the country, create a more stable social
structure, and increase the productivity of its industries. The British made Burma a leading exporter of rice, and the city of Yangon became a major
shipping port as a result. However, this economic expansion came at the expense of traditional Burmese customs and culture. British control eventually
began to wear upon the residents of Burma, and a new independence movement was driven by university student movements as well as religious
movements

George Orwell 's ' Shooting An Elephant ' And ' A Hanging '
In George Orwell's "Shooting an Elephant" and "A Hanging". The setting of both the spots was in Burma, a nation in Asia. In "A Hanging" the
setting was principally in a correctional facility while in "Shooting an Elephant was in a Moulmein, in lower Burma where an Elephant went 'quiet '.
The Characters in "A Hanging" were for the most part a Hindu who was little whit no hair and obscure fluid eyes, additionally he had a thick, mustache
which was humongous for his body. AdditionallyGeorge Orwell played a character in the story however he was the storyteller furthermore there were
six superintendents. The utilization of hues in both stories was for the most part yellow and chestnut. The yellow was utilized to recognize the
general population 's shade in "Shooting an Elephant" while in "A Hanging" it was utilized to apply a picture of the climate and setting of the prison.
Chestnut in "A Hanging" was utilized to recognize the men, "cocoa quiet men were crouching". Chestnut in the other story was utilized to apply a
setting 's vibe. The opening line in "Shooting an Elephant" was "IN MOULMEIN, LOWER BURMA, I was despised by extensive quantities of
individuals the main time in my life that I have been sufficiently critical for this to transpire". In "A Hanging" the opening line is "It was in Burma, a
soaked morning of the downpours". I feel that the opening sentence of "Shooting an Elephant was a great deal more powerful as it shows a result of an
intriguing approach to depend

Genocide In Darfur
Concerning the ethnic minorities of Burma, I believe that we are in a period where carefully analyzed humanitarian input can have a successful
impact. Unlike the genocide in Darfur, we're aware of a developing situation where large–scale genocide has not taken place yet. History further lends a
hand in paralleling the cordoning in society of minorities such as the Rohingya with that of the black African minorities in the Nuba Mountains of
Sudan. Lessons gained in the events in Sudan should be considered in defending the minorities of Burma who are facing human rights violation. The
first step is "early engagement" and awareness. Advocacy before a potential genocide of Burmese minorities will focus international attention on the
Burmese government. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Sudanese government refused to allow NGOs into the Nuba Mountains, where genocide by attrition was taking place. However, "a London–based
human rights group, African Rights, played an instrumental part in both reaching out to the Nuba as well as bringing their plight to the attention of the
international community." African Rights was able to gain access to the Nuba Mountains and provide valuable communication logistics to the Nuba,
which provided a window to the international community of the human rights violations carried out by the Sudanese government. Similarly, Burmese
minorities such as the Rohingyas have been separated from the larger Burmese society. They have very little rights and sustenance. A scenario eerily
familiar to that of the Nuba people. We need to insert humanitarians within these cordoned communities to document human rights violations. The
international community will have a more difficult time ignoring tangible documentation. Moving this groups work beyond university campuses and
onto the ground in Burma is critical to preventing this potential

George Orwell A Hanging
"A Hanging" is a story that was written by the author George Orwell. In this story, Orwell narrates the inhuman capital punishment he saw while he
served in Burma as a member of the imperial police officer. It is a real experience in Orwell's life. He witnessed an execution that led him to feel how
brutal a capital punishment was and how powerless he was in which he could not make any change to it. From the narrative, it is apparently true to say
that Orwell was uncomfortable with the prisoner's execution. This is well evident when he points out "It is curious, but till that moment I had never
realized what it means to destroy a healthy, conscious man." Though the author was filled with anger over the barbarous execution in Burma, he had to
oppress his anger because he did not have any position and power to make any change. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A sickly light, like yellow tinfoil, was slanting over the high walls into the jail yard." This clearly shows that he had no choice but forced himself to
witness the scene that he did not want to see. At this point in time, Orwell made his position clear that capital punishment was totally brutal and
inhumane. Furthermore, Orwell used a dog to express his sympathy and the deepest thoughts towards the prisoners. The actions of the dog make a big
contrast between the Orwell's sympathetic thoughts and the cruel actions of the

Comparison Of Burma And Chile
My reasoning behind using Burma and Chile, is that these two cases are both similar in the fact that the factions were important in demanding change,
but both obtained different outcomes. The reason why I believe that Burma failed in its attempt to become a democratic state, was due to having an
enormous amount of participants that were willing to die for democracy, but overall their movements lacked in quality. According to Chenoweth and
Stephan, "internal disunity and the presence of multiple armed factions weakened the opposition resistance" (Chenoweth & Stephan p.185). In Burma,
its populace knew that they had to protest and riot unjust actions that General Ne Win carried out, the objective of the movements were not clear and
neither was

The Causes Of Ethnic Cleansing In Burma
Burma
I argue that Wirathu of Burma's preaching of hate–filled sermons should not be tolerated. While it is not the cause of the ethnic cleansing in Burma, his
sermons can instigate violence between the Muslims and Buddhists in the country. This ignites more rationalization of the ethnic cleansing.Burma is no
stranger to war or outside influence from other countries in the west, and after the Buddhists of the county fought against military rule in 2007, they
won the international administration (Wade 6). Since the change in administration the Buddhist have been the most vocal about the external threat the
Islamic faith causes for the country (Wade 6). Most of the violence is directed toward the Rohingya Muslims that were banned from Bangladesh
because of violent campaigns (Wade 7). With the Buddhist being the majority, it is easy for them to push out the Rohingya with the ethnic cleansing,
and some argue that Wirathu is at the head of the violence.
Wirathu's sermons include ideas like "In every town there is a savage Muslim majority" (Hodal 4). Or "we are being sexually harassed, ganged up
on, and raped in in every town" (Hodal). Using this kind of language is bound to make his followers and others believe that these acquisitions are true
of the Rohingya. Wirathu also states that "Muslims are only well behaved when they are weak, and that when they are strong they become like wolfs or
jackals and hurt other animals" (Our World" Myanmar's Extremist Monk Wirathu). Wirathu's

What Is The Idea Of Shooting An Elephant By George Orwell...
In "Shooting an Elephant" by George Orwell, he confesses to the hatred of an imperialistic India that causes him to go against his beliefs while
receiving no respect. At this time Burma was under British control with the use of imperialism. George Orwell was an English police officer serving
in Burma, India and hating each aspect of his time there. He was hated by all the Burma, just for being British, but George Orwell was not necessarily
mad, for he sided with the Burma people. He hated the idea of imperialism because it turned people against themselves. However, he didn't like the
Burma people either because they had no respect for him. They would purposely humiliate him in soccer games by knocking him over or standing
making jokes. He still

George Orwell Shooting An Elephant
Shooting an Elephant, George Orwell merely trying to not look like a fool, an inner battle testing his morality and mind. The story taking place in
Burma, the protagonist, a British police officer named George Orwell. Orwell is picked on and loathed by the Burmese, constantly enduring their
tricks and pure despisement. The story truly starts when he is called into do something about a stray elephant who is raging at a bazaar. Once he
arrives at the scene him, a Burmese sub–inspector and some Indian constables discover a dead body a coolie). The coolie had been killed by the
raging elephant, upon discovering the gruesome scene, the office requests an elephant rifle be brought to him. The orderly after delivering the rifle,
tells Orwell the location... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Orwell never wanted to shoot the Elephant as he even compared destroying the elephant to "destroying a huge and costly piece of machinery."
However, as the crowd which represented pressure, watched on with amusement as if as Orwell put it, "they were watching me as they would watch
a conjurer about to perform a trick." The "magic rifle" being Orwell's wand that entranced the audience with every move he made. As Orwell
continues to have an inner dilemma he ultimately becomes as he puts it, "in reality I was only an absurd puppet pushed to and fro by the will of those
yellow faces." One of the major themes throughout the book being pressure to conform. Keep in mind that during this time Orwell a British police
officer justifiably despised upon in Burma as Great Britain colonized Burma enforcing harsh imperialism. Orwell at first tried to justify himself if he
shot the elephant by walking within twenty–five yards and if the elephant charged him he would shoot. However, that play never came into fruition as
he could not get past the possibility that the Burmese would see him get trampled by the elephant. As his previous plan to not shoot the elephant went
down the train, he finally cracked under pressure, solving his inner dilemma. A subtle element incorporated into the elephant was when he would not
die after Orwell shot him. That represented how he made the wrong choice and was truly unjustified in shooting the elephant as his dilemma never truly
ended, it merely transformed into something else. The elephant represented Colonialism as you could never truly kill that, furthermore, you can not go
back in time and fix your mistakes. As can be seen with him leaving the elephant after continuously shooting him, not being able to endure the "dreadful
noise." Representing that Orwell's actions like that of Britain colonizing Burma, were both irreversible,

Ethnic Conflict And Violence In The Rakhine State Of Burma
The origins of ethnic conflict and violence are crucial factors in understanding what motivates groups to commit such atrocious crimes. In the Rakhine
State of Burma a bloody battle has emerged, placing the Rohingya population of the country in the crosshairs of violent military crackdown and
discrimination by the majority Buddhist population. Due to a long complex relationship between the different groups of Burma, predominantly the
muslims and buddhist, a culture of hatred has cast out those in the Rakhine State, Muslim population, claiming them to be foreign aliens with no claims
to rights or freedom within the country. Ervin Straub argues that these long standing cultural differences and living conditions play an integral role in
understanding the rationale behind ethnic violence. The psychological process that goes behind committing these acts is diversely motivated and can
create a strong feeling of hatred and resentment. The persecution of the Rohingya in Burma as a result of deep rooted cultural differences, an us versus
them mentality, and an obedience to authority supports Ervin Staub's argument that these differences can create mental process and rationale for
committing acts of heinous violence.
The history of violence in the Rakhine State against the Rohingya stretches back to the colonial rule of Myanmar by the British. For over a century the
British ruled the country and set in place policies that would encourage a new migrant workforce of Rohingya to enter

The Military Rule Of Burma
The land on which modern–day Myanmar stands could be traced back to Pagan Dynasty. Britain gradually took control of Myanmar in 1824. Burma
was able to gain its independence from the Great Britain in 1948. Burma became a parliamentary democracy, granting autonomous states to minorities.
In 1962 Union Revolutionary Council overthrew the civilian government and suspended the constitution. As a result, the country was under military
rule from 1962 to 1988. The military government transitioned to a socialist economy, nationalized all major industries and reduced the foreign
influence. Years of military rule and suppression and a failed attempt to move to a multi– party election system led to the imposition of economic
sanctions to Myanmar. A new constitution was voted in by the public in 2008, that established a parliamentary system where the military has the 50%
of the seats. The military government was officially dissolved in 2011, and a former member, Thein Sein was inaugurated as president and PM,
convening a largely civilian parliament and begun political, economic and parliamentary reforms. Thein Sein administration brought a period of reform
and enabled the return of international engagement. Through series of reforms such as pardoning to most political prisoners, relaxation of censorship
and efforts toward peace with rebel groups. A second wave of economic reforms was announced that reduced the role of the government in sectors such
as energy, forestry, health care,

Burm A And Strong People
Leigh Lyter
October 22, 2016
Period 1
Myanmar Research Paper In 1989 the country formerly known as Burma switched its name to Myanmar, meaning the "fast and strong people". Burma
or Myanmar, began as individual states with several powerful monarchs, over time the British government took over. This resulted in the First
Anglo–Burmese War that lasted from 1824–1826. The most respected of Myanmar's military leaders during the war was Maha Bandula, who later
died in battle. The British went on to win the war and separate Myanmar into separate colonies in favor of certain ethnicities. Burma gained its
independence when a group called the "Thirty Comrades" created the Burmese Independence Army and fought with Japan in World War II. The Army
believed that if Japan won then they would grant their country freedom, however when Japan began to weaken the group immediately informed the
British Military and agreed to help the British win the war. Aung San was the leader of Burma at the time, and he establish the Burmese Independence
Army and later went on to see Burma separate from Britain, however when he assumed the position of leader of his new country he and his cabinet
members were assassinated by an opposition group. U Nu, a former cabinet member, he became Burma's new leader. At last, Burma was given its
independence on January 4, 1948. However, the new nation was consistently provoked by ethnic communities and opposition groups, this resulted in
multiple civil wars. 10 years

Burmese Food Culture : Burma
Burmese cuisine Burma, also known as Myanmar, is located in the Southeast Asia and bordered by India, China, Thailand and Laos. Because of its
special geographical location, Burma is a multicultural country and it has different ethnic groups like Indian, Chinese and Thai. Burmese food culture
didn 't get much attention for everyone because of their history. But in fact, the Burmese food culture is very similar to the other Asian countries ' that
has its very attractive features. So in order to know more about the Burmese food culture, we need to find out some of the Burmese food knowledge,
such as their food traditions, their eating patterns, and etiquettes, their therapeutic/medicinal foods/taboos. Understanding the food... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Laphet has become the common signature in Burma. No matter as a meal or as a main snack, Laphet is very necessary and popular. The different
cooking styles can display the different taste of the Laphet. As a tropical country, fruit has been the main ingredient in Burma. Many of the tropical
fruit is lush in Burma like mango, banana, lychee and so. But the Burmese like the mango so much. The Burmese mangos are very famous in Asia
because their mango is very sweet and has enough moisture. As Burmese rhyme said "Of all the fruit, the mango is the best; of all the meat, the pork
is the best; and of all the leaves, lahpet is the best". As a multicultural country, Burmese eating patterns and etiquettes are different from the
neighboring countries. "Burmese traditionally eat a morning meal and an evening meal that is taken before dark. The meals are served on a large
platter or on a low table, with members of the household sitting on mats. Food is eaten with the fingers, although sometimes utensils are used. It is
common to drink water and eat fruit after the main meal. Throughout the day people eat betel and smoke tobacco. Burmese not only drink tea made
from dried tea leaves but also eat pickled tea as a snack. Other snacks include chappatis, fried insects, and Chinese pastries."(Countries and Their
Cultures). As you know, Burmese eating pattern is like the habits mixed with Indian and Chinese. In Burma, people like to set on the mat

Shooting An Elephant Analysis
Shooting an Elephant
Shooting an Elephant is a short story written by George Orwell that takes place in Burma. In this short story George Orwell writes about a life
experience he had while he was a young police officer in Burma. Orwell did not enjoy his time in Burma because of the lack of connections he was
able to make with people there. He did not agree with the way they ran things, didn't get along with the people, and had a great amount of hatred for
his job. On top of Orwell disliking all of this, the people in Burma made it obvious to him that they did not appreciate him either. While Orwell was
at a soccer game, he was purposely tripped and instead of anyone showing sympathy for him, everyone yelled out with laughter. Orwell was having
a tough time adjusting and badly wanted to get out of Burma. However he was patiently waiting for a big moment he could take advantage of and
get the people of Burma to gain a little respect for him. Then one day his opportunity came. The opportunity in front of him was as big as he could
imagine. While I was reading this story, I was very engaged and was always wondering what was going to happen next. There were many parts of this
short story that people could connect to. For example, Orwell was having a tough time adjusting to his new culture. I personally do not connect to
that, but I know that many other people in this world are able to connect with Orwell's tough time adjusting. If the reader is able to connect to a
story/book on a personal level, it makes it a lot more enjoyable (easier) to read. Connecting to a story keeps a reader very engaged to the book and
makes them want to keep reading to see how the author/character handles their situation. There was one big event in this story that I and in my
opinion just about everybody should be able to connect too. Towards the end of the short story, Orwell was faced with a tough decision. Orwell was
having a normal day, dreading but getting through his job, and all of a sudden something happened. He had gotten word that an elephant had been
loose around town ruining everything in its path and even killing one civilian. Orwell was the first to the scene and initially did not know how to react.
While he was

Analysis Of George Orwell 's ' Shooting An Elephant '
"Shooting an Elephant" by George Orwell is a story about Orwell 's experience as a police officer for the British Raj in frontier Burma. The exposition
digs into an inward clash that Orwell encounters in his part of representing the British Empire and maintaining the law. At the opening of the narration,
Orwell state, "Theoretically–and secretly, of course–I was all for the Burmese and all against their oppressors, the British..." (Orwell, 1) by doing this,
he clears up that he is against the British colonial undertaking in Burma. In unequivocal terms he says that he is in favor of the Burmese people, whom
he feels are persecuted by colonial rule.
As a police officer, he sees the brutalities of the imperial undertaking very close and direct. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While its dangerous conduct and the Burmese 's defiance that is more modest may not be undeniably great things, they are made reasonable propelled
by the harsh conditions both the elephant and the Burmese have undergone to persevere.
Orwell state, "All I knew was that I was stuck between my hatred of the empire I served and my rage against the evil–spirited little beasts who tried to
make my job impossible" (Orwell, 1). As much as he wants to champion for the plights of the oppressed he is still reluctant to do so as he is unable to
overcome his intuitive urge to avenge the humiliations he suffers at the hand of the Burmese. The character thus has resentment towards the local due
to their unrelenting actions of humiliating him. He also has a strong belief of implied sense that the community, which is at the forefront of humiliating
him, should see him as their alternative powerful hero. Through his actions to portray his powerful nature he proves that he is no different from the
empire he is condemning therefore lacking moral authority to do so.
In a similar manner, the character does not get the whole picture on how he fits into the underlying forces of power of colonialism in Burma and more
so in getting the clear perspective of the narrative brought forth by the rampaging elephant. It is clear that the dynamics of power and colonialism are
too complex to be depicted within a single point of view. Colonialism leads to contradictory

Democracy Was Not Suitable For Burma
From 1948 – 1962, the country existed as a democratic republic, but was largely dysfunctional as there were continued insurgencies by different ethnic
and political factions, such as the Red Flag Communists, the White Flag Communists, the Thirty Comrades, the Revolutionary Burma Army, and the
Karen National Union. In 1962 General Ne Win and the Revolutionary Council led a military Junta that seized control of the Government. They
deposed of Prime Minister U Nu and openly declared that "Parliamentary democracy was not suitable for Burma." (Hoare 2015) The highly
superstitious and oppressive leadership of Ne Win can be observed in what was labeled The Burmese Path to Socialism – a guiding ethos to the
government of the time that was largely oppressive. The key tenants to this path included a totalitarian military rule, which gave no freedoms to its
people. Like many other communist dictatorships, it embraced an attitude of authoritarian socialism, anti–western sentiment, and anti–intellectual
fervor. In Beyond Rangoon we bear witness to the story of Aung Ko, a University Professor who was fired for housing student protestors, despite not
being involved in any other way. (Boorman 1995) Anti–intellectualism is a key for oppressive regimes to retain power, as they must succeed in
silencing all criticism and dissent. More than just being anti–western, the country adopted a militant Burmese nationalism that led to a xenophobic
exclusion of "the other." This, some ways, was a relic

George Orwell Shooting An Elephant
The essay "Shooting an Elephant" by George Orwell examines the truths behind British imperialism and colonialism by following the life of a
British soldier stationed in Burma in the 1920s. The essay describes a situation where the Burmese people pressure a young soldier to take action
and go against his own desires by exterminating an elephant that had previously raided and destroyed parts of a village and killed one of the
Burmese. The soldier also describes his feelings of distaste towards the work that was being done in Burma. This event is when the soldier begins to
realize that he is a puppet being played by both the British and the Burmese to do their dwelling. British imperialism is proved to be evil, resulting in
the personal gain of the British ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During this time, Burma was exploited for its natural resources and served as a trading post between China and Britain as it was accessible by boat
through the Bay of Bengal and the Andaman Sea. Throughout this time of British imperialism the Burmese natives were heavily oppressed by
British powers. European sports such as soccer and other cultural values made their way into the daily life of the Burmese. These people were also
forced to live in poverty, and prisoners were kept in filthy cage–like structures in close quarters with one another and showed evidence of being beaten.
Due to the circumstances, the Burmese despised the British and never let an opportunity to humiliate a soldier go to waste, whether that entailed
glaring, tripping, or spitting on an Englishman. Not only was hatred towards the work of the British Empire from the Burmese evident, but it can also
be seen from some of the British soldiers who were able to see the dirty work up close. Although the young soldier in "Shooting an Elephant" stationed
in Burma was British he states that what he saw in Burma "oppressed [him] with an intolerable sense of guilt"

The Failure and Rebirth of Burmese Nationalism Essay
All people in the world strive to find a sense of belonging. This sense is coupled with ethnic identities, cultural customs, and social implications. The
groups that inhabit the corner of the world, now known as Myanmar, have had great struggles and upheavals through the last century. They have been
stricken with World War, independence struggles, as well as military dictatorship. The Burmese groups have tried with diligence to establish their own
states, but in the end all has fallen upon them and their tale is one of grief and sadness. The failure of Burmese nationalist movement is through the
conflicting interests of the world, the clashes between Burmese ideology, and the differences of ethnic acceptance. However badly the movement...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They wanted freedom from British rule and when WWII started Aung San and 29 others, known collectively as the "Thirty Comrades" left Burma to
train in Japan, hoping for liberation ("Burma"). Promises of liberation were made by Japan but after a few years, it was clear that Japan did not
wish for Burmese autonomy. Recognizing this fact, Aung San hurried quickly to negotiate a deal with the British. He convinced the British to give
them their national freedom if they were to fight the Japanese on behalf of the British. The allied powers won and Britain started the process of
halting its operations in Burma. Aung San was hailed for his achievement of independence from Britain though the future of Burma was not to be so
lucky. Even though he was seen as a controversial figure due to his communist politics, he was able to unite the minority groups of Burma and
secure the writing of a constitution, agreeing to officially end British control. In July of 1947, a year before the official "independence" of Burma,
Aung San and most of his cabinet were sadly murdered by an enemy party (Badertscher). That day would be forever marked in Burmese history and
San's dreams were a glimpse at what could have happened if political thought had been more similar and other resentments were able to be overlooked.
Aung San's death and the effects show the power that different ideologies had towards the

South Suu Kyi 's Freedom From Fear Speech
Freedom, democracy and human rights were the ideals that Burma is lacking under the reign of the military junta led by Ne Win and his Socialist
Party for fifty years. The socialist ideals have only brought fear and poverty to the people of Burma and the protests against the military government
were always brutally suppressed. Aung San Suu Kyi, daughter of the national hero, General Aung San who was assassinated by his rival after he fought
for Burmese independence from England, was filled with the ideals that her father fought for and became a leader for the people to unite them and
challenge the right to rule of the people in power. In Aung San Suu Kyi's Freedom From Fear speech, she argued that the fear of losing power is the real
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The speech reflected Suu Kyi's vision of Burma as a peaceful country and her courage which she did use it in her favor to rouse the people who have
long waited for a change. The purpose of the speech was to made the people see a future Burma with a democratically elected government that respects
human rights and to take effective actions against the government through non–violent confrontations. In Freedom from Fear speech, Suu Kyi begins
by speaking the truth of how fear corrupts all those wielding power and those that are being controlled. As Burma is under the oppressive regime,
she claimed that people may not be able to fight back with arms, but what they can do is to get rid of fear from their minds, and embrace courage to
bear a real revolution which can only be succeeded if it is born of conviction that a change is desperately needed. Truth, justice and compassion are the
only barriers that can stand up against the government as a government that is established with force and concern with only short term profits can
never give the country the whole democracy and human rights. Freedom from fear is the utmost importance in politics and personal life as it is the
start of a system that can help realize the declaration of human rights and democracy. According to Suu Kyi, "As long as there are governments whose
authority is founded on coercion rather than on the mandate of the people and interest groups which place

Healthcare Should Be Suu Kyi 's First Priority For...
Introduction Than Aung is the current minister for the Ministry of Health in Burma. Than Aung is fairly new to this job; he assumed office 1 August
2014. Than Aung is preceded by Pe Thet Khin who was the minister from March 2011– July 2014. Before Aung became minister, he was the Deputy
Minister of the Ministry of Health in Burma. He was also a member of the Naypidaw Council and was the Director of the Myanmar Army Medical
Corps. Having such a successful career so far, his opinion is taken very seriously with issues of healthcare.
Topic 1: The Platform of Aung San Suu Kyi
Aung San Suu Kyi states, "If suffering were an unavoidable part of our existence, we should try to alleviate it as far as possible in practical, earthly
ways." Healthcare should be Suu Kyi's first priority for reforming Burma. Burmese citizens, namely children, are not getting the healthcare that they
deserve. Although Burma is striving for universal healthcare, the amount of money allotted is not enough for people to get the proper care that they
need. As of 2014, Burma allotted approximately $USD18 per capita while the regional average of south–east Asia was approximately $USD70 per
capita. Burma needs to budget more money for healthcare. The mortality rate of children under the age of five in Burma is 9.3% higher than the
global average, and children are not the only place where issues arise. Almost 1 in 4 Burmese citizens between 30–70 die from a noncommunicable
disease (NCD) of either a cancer,

Shooting An Elephant Imperialism
In the story "Shooting an Elephant", George Orwell offers a description on both the external and internal conflicts that he experiences during his
service as a police officer in Burma in the 1920s. The author's main objective in the story is to present a vivid picture about his living conditions in
Burma. He also expresses his discontentment about the British Empire in regards to their imperialism policies that they were imposing on the people
of Burma. The story revolves around three themes that is a feeling of displeasure between the Burmese natives and the British, Orwell's pressure
feelings and imperialism resentment. According to Orwell, both the conquered and conqueror are annihilated in the event of imperialism. While
working under the British command system in Burma, his personal experience makes him to criticize the evils that were an associate of imperialism.
Explicitly, the author stands with the Burmese people since they are most affected by the oppressions of the colonial rule. As a police officer he shares
about the brutalities that are imposed on the Burma people. His experience makes him to express his resentment on the policies presented by the
imperial power. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The British receive consistent ridicules from the natives. This translates to the British despising the Burma people in return. In the story, Orwell
narrates on the tension that prevailed between the two opposing parties. Inevitably, the author is exposed to a situation of dilemma as a police
officer who was a representative of the imperial power. The people of Burma were averse on the British Empire thus their hate was extended to
Orwell who was the face of the Empire. Due to the resentment of the Burmese on Orwell, his stand on supporting the Burma people was restrained.
As a police officer his focus was on trying to avoid the ridicule and mock that he received from the

Analysis Of George Orwell 's ' Shooting An Elephant '
Kylie Murphy
Professor Wilson
WR 122 5 February 2015
Analysis Essay George Orwell's "Shooting an Elephant" is a story about the experience of the narrator who was asked to shoot a wild elephant. He
was a police officer who worked for British imperialists and killing the elephant would help him receive good judgement from the villagers in Burma.
Orwell says that imperialism is evil and should be eliminated while others think that it is good for the public. The purpose of Orwell's story is to
show the audience that imperialism is harmful and not as good as people think. Orwell uses various literary techniques to show the irony of the
whole situation. Orwell's tone is very blunt and outspoken. He convinces the audience that imperialism has a negative impact on those being
governed under the imperialist's power by using his background, ethos, pathos, and imagery. Orwell's background played a big role in the essay. He is
famous for being a political satirist. In "Shooting an Elephant ", Orwell briefly states his opinions on imperialism. He shows feelings of anxiety, fear,
and hatred about the position he is in. Orwell said, "As for the job he was doing, he hated it more bitterly than he can perhaps make clear" (Orwell
278). Although he worked for the British imperialists, he hated what he was doing. Although he didn't want to, he was put in a position where he had
to do what the villagers wanted him to do. In this case it was shooting the elephant. In the story

Oppressed People Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Oppressed People Essay