This document summarizes the purpose and methodology of a research study investigating the relationship between employers' perceptions of convicts and the ability of convicts to find employment after release. The study aims to examine how employers perceive convicts, how convicts perceive their ability to reenter the workforce, and whether education level impacts employment outcomes. It outlines surveys of employers and convicts to collect both quantitative and qualitative data on perceptions and concerns. Interviews will further explore survey responses. Results may provide insight into improving employment and reducing recidivism among released convicts.
4. Employers & Convicts
The effects of employers’ perceptions
on convicts reentering the workforce
Josh Maxwell
Northeastern State University
5. The United States
• is 6th in college degrees and
1st in incarceration rate
• has < 5% of the world’s pop’l,
yet jails ~25% of the world’s
prisoners *
• has seen a 20 year increase: **
1980 – 330,000
1999 – 1.4 million
* Owens(2009)
** Lynch & Sabol (2001)
infographic: FastCoDesign (http://bit.ly/YS4fi1)
6. “Higher education is an
investment for students’
futures…
…Prison is an investment
ensuring ex-convicts have no
future.”
• Ex-con Unemployment: 60%
• College Grad: 12.1%
• Prisoners attending educational
programs while serving time
were less likely to be
incarcerated *
* Vacca (2004)
infographic: FastCoDesign (http://bit.ly/YS4fi1)
7. New Jersey Cost Comparison
1 Princeton Student vs 1 Trenton Inmate*
$37,000 / year / student
$44,000 / year / inmate
* FastCoDesign (http://bit.ly/YS4fi1)
8. “We are poor stewards of
taxpayer money if we ignore
rehabilitation…” *
Will cost taxpayers less in the long run**
Aid convicts in finding job, lower recidivism ***
* Early (2005), p 2
** Haulard (2001)
*** Vacca (2004)
10. “Negativity is the one theme
regarding how convicts perceive
society’s view of them...” *
Convicts feel they are stereotyped in the media as
drug addicts, killers, whores, or “no goods”
Very little air-time is dedicated to convicts who
successfully reenter the workforce & society *
* Howard (2009), p 2
11. Purpose & Research Questions
1. What correlation, if any, is there
between employers’ perceptions and
convicts’ ability to find employment?
a. How do employers perceive convicts?
b. What are convicts’ perceptions of reentry
into the workforce?
12. Purpose & Research Questions
2. Is there a relationship between
employer’s perception of convicts and
convicts’ emotional well being?
3. How does the education level of a
convict correlate to their ability to find
employment after release?
14. Employer Surveys (open/likert)
• What type of business?
• Likely hood of hiring convict?
1 2 34 5
• Would education level affect
decision?
Scale:
1-Very Likely 2-Likely 3-Don’t know
4-Unlikely 5-Very Unlikely
15. Convict Surveys (open/likert)
• Why were you incarcerated?
• Level of incarceration?
county state federal
• How concerned were/are you
about finding employment upon
release?
1 2 3 4 5
Scale:
1-Very Concerned 2-Concerned 3-Don’t know
4-Unconcerned 5-Very Unconcerned
17. Interviews
• Travel to business, home, jail
• Phone interviews a possibility
• Hard copies of questionnaire
• Open-ended questions based on survey
• Minimum of 20 mins, max of 2 hours
18. Confidentiality
Confidentiality Agreement
• Anonymity
• No names, only general information
• Paper data to electronic, paper destroyed
• Stored for 10 years, password protected
• Discarded or follow-up for new research
19. Expected Findings
1. Employers will be less likely to hire
convicts if given the choice.
2. Convicts will be nervous about being
able to attain employment because of
social prejudices
3. Education level will have very little if
any affect on findings