Agricultural Revolution Essay

10. The changes the Agricultural Revolution involved were reclaiming wastelands as done by
Cornelius Vermuyden, to expose more land that could be used for farming, selective breading to
ensure healthier livestock, using more manure to help fertilize the land, crop rotation of crops
that would help replenish the soil of the nutrients it lacked, as well as discovering the significance
of clover. Additionally, the Agricultural Revolution also involved the use of horses instead of
oxen because horses were faster, as well as drilling seeds in a straight row with Jethro Tull's idea.
Also, enclosing the fields was a major change the Agricultural Revolution involved because it
allowed for the better raising of sheep which increased the production of wool on farms. 11. The
dramatic growth of population in the eighteenth century was due to a decreasing death rate because
the disappearance of the Bubonic Plague, inoculations, the increased capability to safeguard food,
and the ability to receive emergency supplies due to a more centralized state contributed to the
decreased death rate that outweighed just the increased birth rates because now many more people
out of the original amount that had been born were living longer. On top of an evident decrease in
the death rate, the increase birth rate was not substantial enough to have a dramatic effect on the
population growth because people still would have died had these issues existed. 12. The advantages
of the putting–out system for
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Impact Of The Agricultural Revolution
Very nice post, Bailey. I thought it was really surprising that the crops the Native Americans
domesticated ended up being sixty percent of the world's agricultural wealth. We really do owe
them a dept. It would be interesting to learn how they "bred" these plants in order to produce
plants that gave a good harvest. You have to imagine it took a lot of trial and error. I agree with you
that the transition to a sedentary lifestyle likely had the biggest impact of the Agricultural
Revolution. It certainly enabled the different tribes to interact with each other and build
relationships, for better or worse. As for the social changes, I agree that the women took on a larger
role in providing for the family but I'm not sure how much their status

The Major Causes Of The Agricultural Revolution
The Agricultural Revolution began as an idea of how to organize fields known as the enclosure
system to substantially produce food. Because of their colonies in the Americas, the British thrived
on new types of food brought from across the Pacific. Additionally, new technologies such as the
**** furthered the productivity of food production. After the influx of new machinery, food types,
and the enclosure system, Great Britain was able to provide more food for its people which both
increased the population while the amount of labor decreased and lowered the cost of food.
A major effect of the Agricultural Revolution was the cultivation of more food and how the cost
of food lowered. This is due to the way in which the cost of food went down. After this increase of
spending money, people of all classes in Europe were able to afford finer things, such as clothing
which is particularly accentuated in document 7. The statistics in Document 2 depict an increase of
the amount of food and productivity of fields in Britain particularly from 1650–1850. The
Agricultural Revolution lasted from the mid–sixteenth to late eighteenth century, supporting the
statistics. Clearly, the amount of money acquired from producing food increased significantly and
for a longer period of time, proving that there was a larger amount of food. In document 3, and
author named Arthur Young described in detail the number of potatoes and other types of food being
grown in Ireland. Not only does his

Agricultural Revolution:–
Introduction:–
Agricultural has been most ancient profession that was adopted by human beings. At start it was
mostly for purpose to fulfill own dietary needs. The methods adopted by farmers were not very
sophisticated. The yield of crops was quite less as there was no way to protect crops from
diseases it was common for farmers to lose their crops against different diseases and remain with
inadequate food for rest of the year. Furthermore was no agricultural equipments available for them
so they can make use of large lands. However with research and technological advancements it
became possible for the farmers to not only protect their crops against decides but also increase
their yield with use ore more effective and sophisticated way of cultivation. (Overton, 1996 p15)
The era between mid 17th and 19th century is marked with revolutionary changes in the field of
agriculture due to increase in land productivity. This era is known as agricultural revolution. It was
time when agricultural out grew faster than ever before and economic scale of cultivation started to
progress due to availability to transportation resources that enable rural farmers to sell their crops to
other markets. (Wyatt, 2009, p 12) This increase in productivity resulted in extra income for farmers
and increased food supply in the market that resulted growth of population and average age of
common people. It was nearly the same time when industrial revolution started many

Summary Of The Agricultural Revolution
The Agricultural Revolution was a wide–scale shift for many human cultures that moved from the
hunting and gathering lifestyle to a lifestyle of agriculture and settlement; this transition is what
Harari would describe, in his book Sapiens, as "History's Biggest Fraud," (Harari 77). The
Agricultural Revolution allowed humans to see how plants grew and developed and helped them
learn to replicate this and domesticate plants. Harari discusses several points that argue how harmful
the Agricultural Revolution actually was. First of all, he argues that hunter–gatherers were more
physically healthy than the average farmer: "[hunter gatherers] were less in danger of starvation
and disease" (Harari 79). At the start of this revolution, farmers found that they could produce a
large sum of food however this food was not necessarily healthy for individuals. The main source
of food was wheat and this did not lead to a very balanced diet. The diet of a forager consisted of
many different vitamins and minerals that cannot be found in the few plants, such as wheat,
potatoes, and rice, that were produced by farmers. The lack of nutrients led to a society of more
people affected by malnutrition. Secondly, the entire community relied on the fields and granaries
of the agricultural village. It was not uncommon for a surrounding village to take over the
settlement leaving the individuals with no home or source of food. In a nomadic society, the village
could get up at any point and more readily

Agricultural Revolution DBQ Essay
The replacement of the idle fallow with crops constituted the Agricultural Revolution. It was
important because the new types of crops made allowed farmers to feed their animals more, which
led to a greater amount of meat and improved diets. It had the greatest effect in England and the Low
Countries. The enclosure movement was where those who practiced crop rotation also wanted a
enclosed, fenced–in field in order to farm efficiently. It promoted economic growth because the
Dutch could specialize and sell to a huge population to earn a great amount of money. It also caused
severe hardship because in England, the amount of independent peasant farmers declined and it
reduced access of poor people to land. Small peasant farmers became landless...show more content...
Also, the death rate was only slightly lower than the birth rate. Lastly, war affected the death rate
because it spread disease as soldiers shared diseases with others. In the 1700s, the population
started to increase significantly because there was a decline in the amount of deaths as the bubonic
plague went away. Stricter laws about quarantine were made along the Austrian border with
Turkey and in Mediterranean ports. Also, a new brown rat started eliminating the black rat, the one
that carried the bubonic plague. All of these helped eliminate the plague. The putting out system
worked by having a merchant gave raw materials to rural cottage workers. At home, the cottage
workers would process those raw materials and then return the finished product to the merchant,
who would pay the workers and sell the product. It was a form of capitalism. The Navigation Acts
were laws stating that any good imported into England and Scotland from Europe needed to be
imported on British or American ships. Great Britain was able to create a vast trading and colonial
empire because colonists had to export their own products on American or British ships, and they
had to buy goods from Great

By 1750 U.S was mainly agricultural, this meant the country was essentially pre–industrial and
domestic. According to our text 9 out of every 10 Americans lived on a farm (2). Households were
generally engaged in subsistence farming and production was done mostly for home consumption.
America had an immeasurable amount of fertile unused land that the government gave away (2). At
the time of George Washington's inauguration in 1789 the U,S population comprised of 4 million
people. The population had doubled to 8 million at the time of the War of 1812 and then again to 16
million in 1835. This rapid population growth did not stop until 1858, we did however continue to
increase in number just at a slower pace, hitting our 100 million mark in 1915, and 300 million in
2006 (3). As the population rapidly increased so did the output of farm labor. By the 1800 the
factory system was introduced which caused the economy to turn from agricultural. Our text states
that all the regions of the U.S. remained agricultural years following the Civil War, moreover New
England, Middle Atlantic states, and the Midwest were poised for major industrial expansion the
would last until the Great Depression (3).The Southern economy however remain agricultural well
into the 20th century. Southern farms were large and by 1860 four– fifths...show more content...
In the latter part of the 1840s John Deere manufactured steel plows, which was a huge upgrade
from the crude wooden plows previously used. A mechanical reaper was patented in 1834 by Cyrus
McCormick, by the end of the Civil War this reaper had quadrupled the average farm output of a
laborer. In addition the Appleby twin binder and the Pitts thresher worked in sync making America's
agriculture the world's most productive (4). Our text tells us that "one of the most dramatic
agricultural advances was the mechanical cotton picker," this came around 1944

The agriculture revolution was the most ground–breaking revolution out of domestication, industrial
and the information revolution. Agriculture improved and evolved the domestication. Even the
industrial revolution would not have been possible if agriculture was not widely used beforehand.
Domestication permitted individuals to stay in one place, building their lives and communities to
last for ages, instead of living the dangerous nomadic life. They were able to finally rely on crops,
that were going to grow for sure, instead of uncertainly gathering from foreign lands. Whether it be
extensive or intensive horticulture, it was a very time consuming and hard labour job. Maintaining
their food supply was the former hunter–gatherers full time

The Industrial Revolution came after the Agricultural Revolution having similar end at the end of
their respective revolutions is an example of how history can lump times together and claim
"progress as an aim." The agricultural revolution and the industrial revolution do help each other in
sustaining their growth whether it was economically, socially, or in power because both revolutions
provided the other with dependant part; the Industrial Revolutions provided mass produced
machinery to the agricultural society and in return the agricultural revolution provided the material
for the mass produced items. C.P Snow describes the "agricultural and the industrial–scientific, are
the only qualitative changes in the social life living condition...show more content...
Looking into the past with modern eyes makes it easier to make the assumption that the progress of
man is something that was ordained to happen the way it turned out, but even at the time of
revolutions, time was still progressing and fluctuating so the outcome we look back on today is just
the outcome that occurred. The first scientific revolution was a time of progress in natural philosophy
which saw progress in thought away from the Church for knowledge from the natural world. Each
revolution despite the progress of each one has its own value. The agricultural revolution was
progressive through the advancement of farm tools and strategies that later were used to grow crops
at a more efficient rate. The Industrial Revolution was a period of change from an agrarian society to
one that manufactured items at immense rates through machinery. The Agricultural and the
Industrial Revolution could be used to promote progress, but the progressive agenda was not in line
with their present. The Scientific Revolution that was happening in the midst of the twentieth
century that saw the sciences emerges into the power. Finally the progress theory can be used to see
spurts of progress through the various revolutions, but it is an ideal that is

Agricultural And Industrial Revolution
There were many developments in the agricultural and industrial revolutions in Russia and
England starting with the doubling of factories and urbanization. The effect was both good and
bad because it helped to give people jobs and be able to get money to survive and have better
housing situations that lasted long term, but it was bad because children would work as young as 5
years old and they would get hurt very easily though in 1819 that was put to a stop by the Factory
Act. The people who built the factories were getting more rich and Manchester became the center of
the British Cotton industry. Yet the employes were getting underpaid and very overworked for all
the work they were doing and little difference was being made to their living/working

Agricultural Revolution Essay
Welcome to the age of an agricultural revolution as everyday biotechnology continues to bring
innovation to human's most basic needs – food. Food is essential to any living organism, providing
energy for our production and nutrients for our protection. Without this fundamental element, life
cannot exist. Our lack to produce our own energy, like plants, causes us to become dependent on
others for survival. Humans existence is attributed only to the million years of evolution our food
source underwent to sustain our survival. Changing the primary nature of our food source, whether
it is plant or animal, directs mankind in a dangerous future if our food dependency is permanently
hampered. Welcome to the age of an agricultural devolution...show more content...
With only a 20–year history, genetic engineering is only a young science with much uncertainly
relativity compared to other fields. Much of the elements bioengineering studies and experiments, the
DNA genome and sequence, are still unknown to the scientific community. Changes in genes greatly
transform the condition, structure, and essence of an organism, giving us an entirely different and
unnatural creation. Even when the physical effects are barely noticeable or deemed safe and ethical,
these modified creations' effects on the environment are impossible to predict and will only emerge
when the damage done becomes evident to the human population. Though a large unknown looms
over modifying genes, bioengineering industries insist upon dismissing the scare over genetic foods
with the vast potential "miracle" foods can benefit upon human society.
Most of the promises made by these corporations are promises of luxury, not necessity, and carry an
inherently and dangerous risk. As science continues to understand further the basic element of life,
DNA, the danger involved genetically modifying organisms becomes apparent. The beneficial
potential genetic engineering brings are attractive, but paradoxically it also brings disastrous
potential at a greater degree. The qualities brought forth by these GM foods are not necessary for our
survival and only brings forth dangerous consequences to our health, environment, and economy. In
order to

Contributions Of The Agricultural Revolution
1. Agricultural Revolution: The agricultural revolution marked the transition from a hunter
gatherer society to an existence based on stationary farming and food production. This revolution
was the most significant event in western history because it provided for so much growth. The
stationary farming led to the development of civilizations, stationary cities and towns. People no
longer needed to be mobile and be able to follow animals or move to new land once they depleted
resources in one area. The stationary farming provided enough food for society to stay put.
Eventually, the farming practices became so productive that one farmer could feed multiple
families. This allowed for people in the community to focus on new skills and start building a
civilization, instead of everyone just working toward the next meal and solely for food. It paved
the way for new jobs, and for children to be educated. Families no longer needed their children to
work all day. The revolution allowed for the population to become educated and to focus on
making life better, instead of only focusing on food. As the food source became more stable and
farming practices became easier, the population increased dramatically. It was now possible for
civilizations to support a large number of people.
2. Black death: The Black Death was a plague that swept across europe during the 14th century. It
killed an estimated в…“ of the population in Europe. In cities the death toll was much higher
because the

How Did The Agricultural Revolution Affect Europe
Economically, the Agricultural Revolution majorly impacted the way of life in the Europe, through
new technological farming advancements and improved land efficiency, ultimately leading to a
greater abundance of food. Compared to feudal society when people depended on small individual
crop yields, many fields were combined in order to produce much larger harvests, increasing the
bounty of food overall. Improved land efficiency came with new innovative ideas, including crop
rotation. Allowing nutrients such as nitrogen to return to the soil, crop rotation along with fodder
crops rotated the fields of crops every few years, leading to more successful yields of crops.
Additional advancements in farming technology, such as the seed drill, helped

The Agricultural Revolution: A Mistake
I don't believe the Agricultural Revolution was a mistake because with out it we wouldn't of learned
about infectious diseases and parasites, along with significance of diets, and the importance of
storing food. Back than they did not have refrigeration or proper canning techinques but from this
we were able to learn that if you store food you can keep it for longer periods of time instead of
eating the food the same day it was collected. Also from understanding about proper storing
techniques we were able to learn more about diseases. Many farmers would loose their crops to
diseases spread by insects or the soil. Now we know to spray pesticides and grow crops during their
specific growing season to help prevent diseases. For example corn is

The Pros And Cons Of The Agricultural Revolution
One main idea from the video was that, in a cause and effect sort of way, is hurting the Earth. The
reasoning behind this theory was that the surplus in food caused by the agricultural revolution
created opportunities for more civilizations which in essence is destroying the natural parts of
Earth. Another main idea is that even though their are some disadvantages to the agricultural
revolution, it was needed for us to move forward as a human race. Without it we would never have
gotten to the point in which we are self sufficient when it comes to food. It also helped us be able to
settle down in civilizations and build the cities we now know

British Agricultural Revolution
The eighteenth and nineteenth hundreds of years conveyed much progression to Britain and
America. It was amid this time period that the British Agricultural insurgency occurred, which was a
time of noteworthy rural advancement stamped by new cultivating methods and innovations that
prompted a huge increment in nourishment creation. This rural development made an expansive
influence that spread all through the nations. Individuals were presently ready to leave the ranches
and move into urban communities in light of the fact that there was adequate horticultural
generation to bolster life far from the homestead.
The accommodations of city life made an interest for different items, for example, garments and
trivial things that enhanced the personal

Physiocrats: The Agricultural Revolution
Our timeline will begin in 1680 and end in 1780. For our project we will build a timeline of the
physiocrats in a photo journal. We will include Turgot, Cantillon, Condillac, and Quesnay. It will
span across these hundred years highlighting the major physiocratic economists. We will anchor our
timeline in the events of the day, most specifically the exploration and the influx of resources from
the new world, and the shifting monarchies which pressed for expansion beyond stability. We will
tie these events to the views presented by our four thinkers who saw land as the foundation of
wealth creation. Between 1680 and 1780 two major revolutions occurred that related to the ideas
discussed by the physiocrats: The Agricultural Revolution in 1700

The Causes Of The Agricultural Revolution
The agricultural revolution is one of the most important events in human history. Also referred to as
the neolithic revolution, it converted nomadic individuals who relied on constantly following
animal migrations for survival into settlers. The need to travel for hunting had diminished and
farming villages began to spring up, which led to the beginning of early civilizations. Due to the
significance this revolution had on developing society, historians have been searching for more
information regarding it. While there is a limited amount of information on the time period where
this took place, the knowledge that has been gained can paint a picture that describes what may
have occurred. What we know now can give us an idea of answers to questions such as how the
agricultural revolution began and the results it had on the first civilizations. Before the agricultural
revolution, early humans would need to constantly gather and hunt for food in order to feed
themselves. Since animals migrated and edible plants became sparse in their location, they could not
stay in the same location permanently. This resulted in these early humans travelling constantly in
order to find food for survival. Based on speculation, it is believed that they would travel in groups,
since hunting and gathering required effort from more than one individual. When these groups were
stationary, they would set up camps and live in either caves or simple wooden structures covered in
animal hides. However as

Agricultural Revolution occurred in many different regions of the world, including Fertile Crescent
and Mesoamerica. Fertile Crescent, where the revolution first occurred in 9000–7000 B.C.E, was
located in present–day Iraq, Syria, Israel, Palestine, and Southern Turkey. Mesoamerica, located in
present–day Mexico, had the revolution occurred about 6000 years later since the agriculture started
in the Fertile Crescent. Numerous differences between two different regions from different
hemispheres show why Fertile Crescent had advantages over Mesoamerica in terms of Agriculture.
Significant environmental differences between Mesoamerica and Fertile Crescent determines what
kinds of resources they could obtain. In other words, a region with a plethora...show more content...
Fertile Crescent had environmental advantages; therefore, it had had more resources than in
Mesoamerica. For example, only llama or alpaca could be domesticated in Mesoamerica, and no
sheep, goats, pigs, cattle, or horses were found in the Eastern hemisphere. Thus, the people in
Mesoamerica had to find a source of protein, and they started relying more on hunting and fishing
than domesticating. Had people also lacked mineral–rich cereal grains, so they grew squash, beans,
and teosinte, an ancestral form of corn or maize, to supplicate themselves with dietary protein. On
the other had, in the Fertile Crescent, they could domesticate more various kinds of species, since
they had already existed in the Fertile Crescent. Rich cereal grains, barley, wheat, lentils, and figs
could be grown, and people could intake sufficient nutrients. With existing animals and plants in
the Fertile Crescent, people could breed animals to produce more different types of species, which
could provide them plenty of food. Even though a blight would strike the plants, people would still
have other foods that they could feed themselves with. As a result, people of the Fertile Crescent
were able to have a longer lifespan, and a greater population than it did in Mesoamerica. With more
people to work together with, agriculture was able to thrive more in the Fertile Crescent than in

Women and the Agricultural Revolution Essay
Women and the Agricultural Revolution
Elise Boulding in her article, Women and the Agricultural Revolution, argues that women played a
key role in initiating the Agricultural Revolution. She defines the revolution as happening within
two stages: horticulture and agriculture proper. Women had a prominent role within the earlier form,
horticulture. Horticulture is defined as farming for subsistence only.Women's roles on thefarm were
not as dominant as society grew to farming for surplus instead. Boulding begins the article by
discussing the shift society made from wandering nomads to settled villagers. She explains that it
was women who recognized that plants could be easily domesticated. It was because of the
domestication of...show more content...
They did much of the planting and gathering, and Boulding states that women probably even
constructed the mud–houses in the early villages. In this horticulture society, children also helped
women. They carryed out many chores on the farm, such as taking care of animals and gathering
grain. These roles would change as farming shifted to agriculture proper.
At horticulture stage, the farming of these early people was for the purpose of providing enough
food for the family. In these farms, women were able to farm the lands without much aid. Instead,
they used simple small hand tools to do the work. However, once the farms grew in size and they
had a surplus of food, they required more help.
Gradually, as the farms grew, there was a shift from merely farming to provide for the family, to
farming for economic profit as well. As a result, Boulding argues that women were no longer the
main workers on the farm. Women continued to help the development of the Agricultural Revolution
despite their role change. Originally, women used digging sticks for gathering, planting, and growing
plants. As the farming purpose changed, however, the tools changed as well.
The plow and animals were used for cultivation, making women less visible on the field.
Yet, women continued to help by creating baskets and discovering pottery, all of which enabled them
to store more grain.

Agricultural Revolution Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Agricultural Revolution Essay

Similar to Agricultural Revolution Essay (7)

More from Paper Writing Service College

More from Paper Writing Service College (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Agricultural Revolution Essay