China has been successful at lifting much of its population out of poverty. This was accomplished through policies that distributed wealth more evenly and increased access to resources. The document discusses definitions of poverty and statistics showing declines in global poverty rates from 52% in 1981 to 21% in 2012. Countries like Norway have almost no poverty due to policies that lift up the masses as consumers rather than just showing off wealth. Wealth is defined not just by GNP but also general well-being as measured by GNH.
2. +
Find an example of a country that has
been successful at lifting all or most of it
population out of poverty.
Discuss explanations of how this was
accomplished.
4. +
Poverty definition
”The state or condition of having little or no money, goods, or
means of support; condition of being poor” -
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/poverty
Absolute and relative poverty
9. + With almost the same resources, how does
differences like this develop?
Norway, Nigeria
Policy of wealth distribution
Lifting the masses = consumers
”Showing of” instead of lifting
Absloute: 1,25 dollars a day
Relative: I forhold til en gruppe
Man kan telle antall fattige. Da får man det som på engelsk kalles: Head count measure.
Deler man det tallet på antall innbyggere får man såkalte Head count ratio (ordrett oversettelse: hodetellingsforholdstall): Headcount measure/innbyggertall = Head count ratio.
En svakhet ved dette målet er at det ikke sier noe om hvor langt under målestokken den enkelte fattige befinner seg. Derfor kan det være bedre å bruke andre metoder å regne ut på:
Fattigdomsgap (Poverty Gap) = Hvor mye det vil koste å få alle fattige over fattigdomsgrensa. Avstanden mellom fattigdomsgrensa og inntekten til de fattige totalt sett.
Gjennomsnittlig fattigdomsgap (APG) = Fattigdomsgap/Antall fattige. Gir avstanden mellom fattigdomsgrensa og inntekten til de fattige, gjennomsnittlig for hver fattig.
Normalisert fattigdomsgap = APG/Fattigdomsgrense. Hvor mye man er under fattigdomsgrensa i forhold til fattigdomsgrennsa. Gir et tall mellom 0 og 1, der lavest mulig tall betyr minst fattigdom.
Ant absolute poverty,
According to these estimates, 21 percent of people in the developing world lived at or below $1.25 a day. That’s down from 43 percent in 1990 and 52 percent in 1981.
This means that 1.22 billion people lived on less than $1.25 a day in 2010, compared with 1.91 billion in 1990, and 1.94 billion in 1981.
Resources
Policy of wealth distribution
Norge fordeligspolitik vs nigeria borgerkrig
The key to success in norwegian society isthe wealth distrubution. Its political consensus to invest the oil income for future use, and also use it to the good of comon people. Therefore we have split the wealth between the polulation =making more of us consumers = more money for the country.
Nigeria on the other hand, has a more corrupt society where induvidials try to benefit for themselves and their inner circle, from their lands resources. The focus is on short term profits rather than sustainable development for the country. At the same time, nigeria is one of the countries in africa with highest growth in GNP, as we saw in the diagram. BUT, this does not show the living standars or how many people benefits from the resources /the wealth is divided between.
The key to lift the masses is wealth distrubution and investment in future projects. Not showing of with building skylines like this one in lagos, but invest the money in the masses. A sustainable solution is lift the masses – and make them future consumers.