Integrating Telephony Systems with Salesforce: Insights and Considerations, B...
From Java to Python: beating the Stockholm syndrome
1. from java to python
beating the stockholm syndrome
Javier Arias Losada
@javier_arilos
2. We are going to compare Java versus Python
through some random topics… but not trying to
be exhaustive or follow any logical patterns…
just aspects I liked, disliked or just caught my
attention.
Disclaimer
1. Some points have been improved in latest versions of Python
and Java
2. Opinions stated are those of the author, Javier Arias
3. Working since 1997 with OO languages, mainly in
Java and some Smalltalk… one has some rigidness
regarding idioms, mental schemes and patterns…
Python approach to many aspects is different
from Java and tends to be more pragmatic.
4. verbosity and ease of reading (I)
“(…) when you program, you have to think about how someone will read your
code, not just how a computer will interpret it.”
- Kent Beck
Indentation, expressiveness and idioms, libraries matter.
BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(file));
String line;
while ((line = br.readLine()) != null) {
// do something with line.
}
br.close();
with open(...) as f:
for line in f:
# do something with line
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5868369/how-to-read-a-large-text-file-line-by-line-in-java
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8009882/how-to-read-large-file-line-by-line-in-python
5. verbosity and ease of reading (II)
logical expressions & truthy values:
if x and x not in elements:
print ‘done’
if (x != null && !elements.contains(x))
{
System.out.println(“done”);
}
Python seems to be ahead here, improves this productivity?
Usually code is easier to read and maintain in Python.
Refactoring is faster and more secure in Java (static typing
+ advanced IDE’s).
6. verbosity and ease of reading (III)
method and function definition
An example: parse N lines of a file, searching for a text
Python keyword args: named and optional, default values.
def search(txt, file=’./f.txt’, lines=0):
return 0
Java method overriding: different methods with different
parameters (number and type)
public int search(String txt, String file, Integer lines){
return 0;
}
7. verbosity and ease of reading (IV)
Lets add optional params in Java:
public int search(String txt, Integer lines){
search(txt, “./f.txt”, lines);
}
public int search(String txt, String file){
search(txt, file, 0);
}
Java’s method signature overriding is very useful for
maintaining functions (and constructors) less cluttered.
8. verbosity and ease of reading (V)
New Requirement: extend our search function to search for a
client’s name, accept instances of Client class.
public int search(Client client, String file){
search(client.getName(), file);
}
def search(what, file=’./f.txt’, lines=0):
if isinstance(what, Client):
what = what.name
(...)
Results of the exercise:
Java: one core method and three “facilitator” methods.
Python: one method that is caring about type of parameters.
9. verbosity and ease of reading (VI)
List and dictionary comprehensions
a real example: filtering a dictionary.
filtered_policies = {pol: spr_message.policies[pol]
for pol in _GCM_ALLOWED_POLICIES
if pol in spr_message.policies}
Python Dict and list comprehension are very flexible and
powerful ways of creating lists and dict on the fly.
filteredPolicies = sprMessage.getPolicies().keySet()
.retainAll(GCM_ALLOWED_POLICIES);
Java is usually more verbose and less fluent for this
collection related tasks, but sometimes a well designed API
can do miracles, as in this example.
10. verbosity and ease of reading (end)
searched google looking for
the shortest tutorials of each language:
As an objective indicator,
Teach yourself Java in 21 minutes:
http://www.debevc.uni-mb.si/IT2003/Razno/teach_Java_21_minutes.pdf
Learn Python in 10 minutes:
http://www.stavros.io/tutorials/python/
Python is half as verbose as Java.
If you ignore me, in the time of this talk you can learn both
languages.
Just joking :-)
11. as object oriented languages (I)
inheritance
Liskov Substitution Principle: If S is a subtype of T, then
objects of type T may be replaced with objects of type S.
Use your code without caring about what type or subtype it is.
Java
simple inheritance.
interfaces.
statically-strongly typed.
Python
multiple inheritance.
dynamically-strongly typed.
12. as object oriented languages (II)
composition-inheritance-multiple inheritance
“In object-oriented programming, Inheritance is the evil forest (...) deep inside
the Dark Forest Inheritance is the Evil Queen Multiple Inheritance (...)”
- Learn Python the hard way:
http://bit.ly/O709e9
Java super
super();
super.aMethod();
Python super
super(class, object)
super may not call parent: MRO
A
/
super always call parent.
B
C
/
D
About MRO in Python: http://bit.ly/18RHQBC
13. as object oriented languages (III)
inheritance
The Circle / Ellipse problem:
➔ In maths, circle is a special case for an ellipse: both axes
are equal
➔ Who should be superclass and subclass?
◆
◆
If Ellipse is the parent: what happens with the Ellipse method that
stretches an axis? what does that mean for Circle instances?
If Circle is the parent, seems counterintuitive and no code reused.
Two ways of thinking about subclassing:
1.
2.
The OO classic view
Pragmatic’s non-taxonomy based approach
14. as object oriented languages (IV)
inheritance, classic OO view
a subclass is a specialization of a superclass.
Organize your code by taxonomies: "Is-a" relationships. e.g. Dog
is-an Animal.
"Inheritance is the idea that one class is a specialization of another class." Code Complete.
This is what the majority of us do: at least in Java, probably
in Python as well.
15. as object oriented languages (V)
inheritance, alternative approach
Inheritance as a mechanism for code reuse,
nothing to do with taxonomies.
Raymond Hettinger, Python core developer:
Put the Dog on top,
if the Dog has more code that is useful for Animal
From The art of subclassing, Raymond Hettinger.
"How do you decide which one is on top? There is no principle of specialization. (...) Why do we
subclass? Is just a way to reuse code. (...) the one that has more code that is reusable by the other
class should be the parent. If the Dog has more code that is useful for Animal, put the Dog on top.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=miGolgp9xq8#t=640
16. as object oriented languages (VI)
polymorphism
[1]
- ad-hoc polymorphism: function overloading [already covered]
- parametric polymorphism: generic type that can handle
different types without worrying about their types.
Java: generics:
List<String> l = new ArrayList<String>();
Python: builtin:
l = []
[1]three types of polymorphism, according to wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.
org/wiki/Polymorphism_(computer_science)
17. as object oriented languages (VII)
polymorphism
- subtyping polymorphism: duck and chicken walk differently
Java: inheritance + interfaces + static typing
public class Duck extends Bird implements Swimmer{
public String quack(){
(...)
public void walk(){
(...)
(...)
Duck donald = new Duck();
donald.walk();
donald.fly();
donald.quack();
donald.swim();
[1]three types of polymorphism, according to wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.
org/wiki/Polymorphism_(computer_science)
18. as object oriented languages (VII)
polymorphism
- subtyping polymorphism: duck and chicken walk differently
Python: inheritance + duck typing + protocols
class Duck(Bird):
def quack():
def walk():
(...)
(...)
(...)
donald = Duck()
donald.walk()
donald.fly()
donald.quack()
donald.swim()
[1]three types of polymorphism, according to wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.
org/wiki/Polymorphism_(computer_science)
19. as object oriented languages (VII)
encapsulation:
OCP (open closed principle) : "software entities (classes, modules,
functions, etc.) should be open for extension, but closed for modification"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open/closed_principle
visibility (public, protected, ...), javabeans (Java)
versus
"_", "we are all consenting adults here" (Python)
[1]
Python name mangling.
[1] from python mail: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/tutor/2003-October/025932.
html
20. execution model (I)
Python execution model differs from those of Java and C++.
In Python everything is a name bounded to an object.
In Java class lifecycle is
separated in load,
initialization and execution.
In Python, LoC are executed.
No separation between
declaration and execution.
1. Class resolved and loaded.
2. Class is initialized.
3. Code in class used.
Functions (def)
(class)
Modules
Entry points to code well
defined: main
Classes
(import)
Entry points to code are the
same modules
22. execution model (III)
●
●
●
implicit variable declaration
duplicate declarations
parameter default values that are mutable
class A(object):
def __init__(self, p1=0,
p2=None,p3=[]):
self.v1 = p1
self.v2 = p2
self.v3 = p3
def method1(self, p):
self.v3.append(p)
def method1(self, p1, p2):
self.lastp1 = p1
self.v3.append(p2)
print self.lastp1
In [5]: a = A(p2=3)
In [6]: a.method1(1, 2)
1
In [9]: print a.lastp1
1
In [10]: a2 = A(p1=3)
In [12]: print a2.v3
[2]
In [13]: print a.v3
[2]
23. execution model (IV)
monkey patching
class A(object):
def __init__(self, p1=0,
p2=None,p3=[]):
self.v1 = p1
self.v2 = p2
self.v3 = p3
def method1(self, p):
self.v3.append(p)
def method1(self, p1, p2):
self.lastp1 = p1
self.v3.append(p2)
print self.lastp1
In [22]: a = A()
In [23]: a.method1(1, 2)
1
In [24]: def m1(self, p, p2):
print 'modified ' + str
(p)
....:
In [25]: A.method1 = m1
In [26]: a.method1(1, 2)
modified 1
Remember: in Python everything is a name bounded to an object.
24. wrap up
You solve the problems.
The most important part of
any language is you, the
developer.
No clear winner, today I
prefer Python.
Thanks for attending!