Hitler Film Analysis

Hitler Film Analysis
The hilarious part is a commanding component in this film.As,the performer Chaplin reproached
Nazism with a light touch.
For instance, the discourse toward the start of the film, where Hynkel is the portrayal of Hitler,
significantly against semitic, he delievers various put–down to the Jews, which are deciphered just
by: " Our Brilliance has quite recently said a few words on the Jews."
Additionally, Hitler despised kids. We see this when Hynkel dries his hands precisely in the wake of
having touched one. Charles Chaplin has put in his film various references to the acts of the Nazis.
We discover inhumane imprisonments, Gestapo, the attack of Austria or specialist exasperated by
Hitler.
For sure this film is a cartoon of the truth of the 1940s, amid the Second World War. Tomania is a
portrayal of Germany; Adénoïde Hynkel is Adolf Hitler's exaggeration; Benzino Napoloni that of
Benito Mussolini.
The flag of the Nazi party in the film contains two crosses, while in the truth, this one conveys just a
swastika. The hynkel's suit looks unequivocally like the Hitlerian customary outfit did. The physical
appearance additionally focuses on the similarity: Hitler's trademark mustache, hairdo, darker eyes
and dull eyebrows. The pantomimes as the impersonation of the Hitlerian salute, the method for
conveying everything that needs to be conveyed, vicious and jerky and the unrivaled mentality
towards every single other man portrayed Hitler in his lifetime.
Likewise, Benzino
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Great Dictator
As soon as The Great Dictator, directed by Charlie Chaplin in 1940, begins the audience is
immediately brought back into World War I and then the following decades of international conflict
and turmoil (Dir Chaplin 1940). However, the entire film is filled with twists and metaphors, as the
film serves as a satire of Hitler's regime. Chaplin even resembles Hitler, which not only provides the
double–casting of the film but enables the message of the film, echoed in the concluding speech, to
resonate with the audience even further. While I am sure viewers at the time perceived this film in
an extremely different light, as the horrors of the Holocaust were not yet known, to me this film in a
way served as a historical recap filled with parody and mockery. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
From the perspective of someone who knows about this history, these names are effectively funny
and Chaplin's perceptions of these characters definitely should not go over anyone's heads. Even the
Tomanian, or German–gibberish, language adds a layer into the film, creating a more authentic film
for American viewers. However, the ending breaks away from what happened in history, enabling
viewers to see the faults occurring at this time and even anticipate what is yet to come. In that sense,
I found the film relatively predictable until the end because of course we all know what really
happened in Europe at that time. This authenticity during a majority of the film was necessary in
order for viewers understand the harsh realities and persecution going on in Europe, especially from
Chaplin's

Similarities Between Cheorge Orwell And Animal Farm
Charlie Chaplin & George Orwell versus Totalitarianism
So far of what is known, there are 2 stories that was addressed and talks about different social values
in society, whether it was through history or today. Orwell's Animal Farm talks about the process,
aftermath, and danger of totalitarianism in the Russian Revolution using allegories of farm animals.
Pericles takes praise of his Athenian society while contrasting it with other societies in a funeral
oration. There is another literature work that majority of people would find brilliant and somewhat
relates to one of the learned works about social values in society. A speech made by the famous
Charlie Chaplin, called "The Final Speech" from the classic 1940s film, "The Great Dictator,"
includes many points that are associated with dictatorship and the free will of people. Chaplin's
speech and Orwell's Animal Farm have quite similar in terms of technique usage and purposes to the
audience. One of the many points "The Final Speech" and "Animal Farm" have in common is that it
addresses the harm or the danger of totalitarianism applied to a society. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Great Dictator also discusses totalitarianism but in the form of encouraging people oppressed by
dictators to go against them and to be free, as noted in the line, "Soldiers! Don't give yourselves to
brutes ... Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men – machine men with machine minds and
machine hearts! You are not machines! You are not cattle! You are men!" (Paragraph 5, Great
Dictator) They both prove that totalitarianism is never the best government as they enslave the
people, bringing them misery and suffering, and corrupt the government with power. They also
encourage the oppressed people to revolve against totalitarianism and to be free as it was always
intended to be. Both the Final Speech and Animal Farm are similar as they share positive points
about never accepting totalitarianism into their

The Great Dictator By Charlie Chaplin
The Great Dictator– Chaplin Speech Analysis In the 1940's film The Great Dictator by Charlie
Chaplin, Chaplin plays the role of a Jewish Barber set in a time similar to that of World War II. The
jewish barber shares a striking resemblance to that of the great dictator Hynkel. In the third act of
the film Hynkel is captured by mistake from his own soldiers and they mistaken the jewish barber as
their great dictator. With this new great power bestowed upon the jewish barber he uses this chance
to cry out to the people of the newly invaded country that Hynkel had sieged. In this short speech
Charlie Chaplin delivers it with a style similar to that of Hitler. Chaplin at this point uses pure
emotions to fuel his speech while he brings strategies such as hyperboles and metaphors to convince
the audience to stand up for what 's right and to bring humanity back to what we as humans once
were. The biggest factor about Charlie Chaplin 's speech that really draws people in is its emotional
factor. As the great dictator in the film is based off of Adolf Hitler, the format in which Chaplin
gives the speech mirrors Hitler 's style. Like most of Hitler 's speeches, The Jewish Barber starts off
subtle with a soft and gentle voice saying "We want to help one another, human beings are like
that..." The first three paragraphs are given very softly with a touch of sorrow and remorse. Chaplin
pitties humanity with words such as "More than

Great Leaders: Bullies Vs. Dictators
Bullies Vs. Dictators
Bullies and dictators are known as the supreme leaders of their territory, but there is quite a
distinction in what defines a bully and what defines a dictator. A bully is someone who uses their
power to intimidate and harm those who are weaker. On the other hand, a dictator is someone who
gets power by force and that rules a whole country. Both of these live by tormenting the lives of
others, but they have different ways of doing so. They both abide over the Darwinist thought of
survival of the fittest. Bullies, especially at schools, have common things that resemble the life of a
dictator. Although bullies and dictators are both distinctly defined, they both are quite similar by
how they both rule over the weak, abuse their power, and have a comparable personality.
First, bullies rule people who are weak and afraid of them. Bullies like to feel superior and with full
control over their victims. A bully will control anyone who seems helpless to defend themselves. For
instance, vulnerable people become the main ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Dictators are manipulative and give false promises to the people in their country. They blame others
for their mistakes and control them into doing as they please. They believe that their will and their
desire is all that is important. Dictators are also narcissistic and have a feeling of grandeur. The more
power they gain, the more powerful they feel. Dictators are selfish and care more about themselves
than for their people.They do not seek help and believe that nothing is wrong with them. They
believe they are entitled to unlimited praise and deference (Tassew). Dictators have an inability to
identify with the feelings, needs, and viewpoints of others. Despite the fact that bullies rule over
weak people and dictators rule a whole country, they both have similar

Ethos In The Great Dictator
Speeches are the most common action that most people do when they are trying to express what
beliefs and values they have to a group or nation. A speech can have a strong impact on people if
they have a clear reason or opinions that need to discuss on what they are talking about to make an
impact towards their audience. They can change a person view or opinions on a complex issue that
is relevant to their audience. In the movie "The Great Dictator" that was written, produced, and
directed, by Charlie Chaplin. He had a speech in the movie where; he addresses how humanity has
lost its way and, the only way to be free from that is to unite. Chaplin explains why humanity has
lost their way. He effectively convinces his audience that humanity has ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
From the beginning of his speech, Chaplin showed what kind of character he is. In his speech he
said, "I'm sorry but I don't want to be an Emperor that's not my business. I don't want to rule or
conquer anyone." This shows that he is not a ruler, even if he is the rightful ruler; he does not want
to control or conquer other's rights. Chaplin also stated that, "I should like to help everyone – if
possible – Jew, Gentile black, and white. He shows his personality to all other races other than his
own. It showed that he cared about everyone it doesn't matter what ethnic background you are he
wants to help everyone if he could. In his discussion he states, "We all want to help one another.
Human beings are like that. We want to live by each other's happiness – not by each other's misery.
We don't want to hate and despise one another." To put it in another way he illustrates that he is an
ordinary human despite his ranking. He was showing that he sees how "we' as in people want to live
happily together not to hate or look down on one another. His use of repetitions of the word "we"
had a great meaning behind his character. Instead of addressing him; he was addressing everyone, to
show that he needs everyone's help to accomplish his beliefs of

Charlie Chaplin Speech Essay
The speech is about Charlie Chaplin don't want to be a emperor and rule or conquer anyone. He
want to be cool with everyone if it is possible. He said he don 't want to hurt no one feelings and he
said there is plenty of space for people. Charlie Chaplin said don 't give yourselves to people if you
don 't want your stuff out in the air. Fight for your lives to get no problem. In the passage he that not
his business to be a Emperor. Black or White will like to help each other when they are down. He
don 't want to despise people feeling.He said we don 't want to be mean to everyone. He want
everybody to live happy to each other.He don 't want to be mean to everyone. This evidence
explains that Charlie Chaplin do not want to be mean to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I think Chaplin went with sound because he wanted to get in dept with what he was saying. I think
the speech sound is that he get louder and ge get emotional about what he is talking about. He is
easily considered one of the most important figures in industries, with a career that spanned more
than 75 years. I think he was great, he was trying to show that he was getting so emotional. He felt
sad because he thought that some people didn't believe what he was saying was true. He want
people to take his word in life and use it to let your life be better. Chaplin was the that comedies to
create a show for the little kids to have fun to watch. He made over a decade after he made his first
sound. He was frequently trying to attempted the Nazis comedy. Him and the Nazis had a refusal to
accept anything other than joke. Chaplin exposes his feeling by bursting and swollen his bubble of
meanful words. He was giving this message because they wanted him to feel famous to everyone.
This explain that he know what he talking about. He really want people to listen to what he is
talking about because it 's really important to him.I think that he is scared to talk.He like to help
everyone. The issue of the film is when the barber is given the opportunity to speak to the people of
the two warring countries as the dictator. . In fact, Charlie Chaplin felt that this would twist his
message and eventually his success would fall apart.

Charlie Chaplin Research Paper
"A day without laughter is a day wasted" Charlie Chaplin was an actor in the silent film industry and
live show performances. Charlie Chaplin will be forever remembered for his funny acting and
hilarious stunts. Charlie Chaplin was one of the most known comedians in the movie industry and
live show performances. Chaplin was born in London on April 1889 of his mother, Lily Harley and
his father, Charles Chaplin Sr, he had one brother, Sidney. During Chaplin's childhood, he was a tap
dancer and played a part in the Lancaster Lads, a tap dancing and comedy group. His education
came from charitable schools because he was so poor. In 1908 he joined casey's circus, and he
earned $150 a week. He had two marriages and 8 children. He started

Rhetorical Analysis Of Charles Chaplin's Speech By Charlie...
The speech is about Charlie Chaplin don't want to be a emperor and rule or conquer anyone. He
want to be cool with everyone if it is possible. He said he don't want to hurt no one feelings and he
said there is plenty of space for people. Charlie Chaplin said don't give yourselves to people if you
don't want your stuff out in the air. Fight for your lives to get no problem. In the passage he that not
his business to be a Emperor. Black or White will like to help each other when they are down. He
don't want to despise people feeling.He said we don't want to be mean to everyone. He want
everybody to live happy to each other.He don't want to be mean to everyone. This evidence explains
that Charlie Chaplin do not want to be mean to anybody. He is a helpful man that want disturb no
one when they are doing something.He want to get out mess people put him in.He do not want to be
the dictator. He didn't want to let his business out to the world. Charlie Chaplin audience is us
because he wanted to talk to us about life. He was talking about he don't want to be a emperor
because that not his business and he have strong feeling about how thing are going.He telling people
do not give up on what you are doing and don't fight for soldier fight for slavery for your life can be
better to you and your family. The audience want to learn that it is important to live for your mistake
and do what he told you to do.He said if we didn't have a quality life we will be violent. The sound
of Charlie Chaplin sound is a democracy call for the citizen get to stand to fight the candidates
around us and the dinner table. Some stuff that He talk about is getting to personal that it's easy to
forget what we fighting for in the same country. The nation is fully busy in the politics of the
election. Charlie Chaplin had a fabulous embarrassing exaggeration. Charlie Chaplin was example
for the Hollywood Interview. Charlie had ran the Nazis off by telling them that he was a
Jewish.Charlie told them that he was a dictator and they was extremely caution of picking sides for
the war. Half of it was up to the main people from the German market. I think Chaplin went with
sound because he wanted to get in dept with what he was saying.He want people

Chaplin And Hitler
In the second decade of the twentieth century, a man named Charlie Chaplin achieved world fame
through cinema. He did so even before the cinema had come of age. Chaplin's contribution to the
development of cinema was nothing short of enormous. The time in which Chaplin's career was
flourishing, was also a time when the world was experiencing many problems. Chaplin's personal
beliefs, in combination with the events happening in the world at the time, were a driving force in
what message one of his later films carried.
Many historians note the similarity of Chaplin to Hitler. One of the most apparent facts is that they
were both born within four days of each other in the year 1889. Furthermore, the two men bore ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He was no longer "The tramp" in films. A real job and a social standing, as a Jewish barber, had
replaced his comical mannerisms and out–of–touch approach to life. His decision to do the film
made sense for the time, seeing as he had a great disdain for the German government. It also would
not be an overstatement to say that Chaplin harbored a small "grudge" against the German regime.
The film progresses steadily to its controversial anti–Nazi climax. Charlie the barber is mistaken for
the dictator (Hynkel) and is marched to the podium by his supporters to deliver a speech to the
congregation. Upon arriving there, the barber rallies himself to deliver a noteworthy speech against
the evils of fascism and dictatorship. The speech he delivers goes as follows:
I'm sorry, but I don't want to be emperor. I don't want to rule or conquer anyone. I should like to help
everyone, if possible –– Jew, Gentile –– black men –– white . . . The way of life can be beautiful,
but we have lost the way. Greed has poisoned men's souls –– has barricaded the world with hate ––
has goose–stepped us

Stormtroopers In The Great Dictator
The portrayal of the "Double–Cross," the spoof of Nazis, and Adenoid Hynkel, the spoof of Adolf
Hitler, in Charlie Chaplin's The Great Dictator (1940) is complex and contradictory at times. The
stormtroopers are the butt of frequent jokes throughout the film. However incompetent they are,
though, there is no doubt they pose a real threat. As the film develops the dynamics between Hynkel
and the stormtroopers, we learn the stormtroopers mainly pose a threat because they're easily
corruptible and blindly following the orders of Hynkel and other high–ranking fascists who do
genuinely hold the beliefs they profess. The lower–ranking fascists show more flexibility in their
behaviors, acting however will benefit their leaders the most. We see the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He meticulously fantasizes in his destruction of Jewish people and brown–eyed brunette people to
create what he considers to be a pure Aryan race, but also breaks out into immature quarrels such as
the food fight he has with Napaloni. It's easy to imagine a horrific and violent situation arising from
nothing more than his unreasonable anger. At the same time, we see his malevolence specifically as
he plans how to control the Jewish people in this concentration camps. He discusses with Garbitsch
how they need to do something astronomical in order to obtain the submission of the Jews. In this
scene, Chaplin reflects on his plans in a mirrored cabinet, indicating his thoughts about how he
wants to be seen. However, Hynkel and Garbitsch quickly work backwards and decide they must
cease their persecution in order to borrow money from a Jewish banker Epstein, invade Osterlich,
and use that display of power to secure their submission. He sees Jews as clearly inferior, but is
clever enough to attempt manipulating them into helping their own destruction. Luckily, Epstein
isn't naive enough to fall for this, and Hynkel's true colors reappear as he receives the rejection and
orders intense persecution in the Jewish

Charlie Chaplin's The Great Dictator
Kathy A. Weaver Mrs. Mary Scudier Writing l 2 October 2017 Dictate Fate, Then vs. Now British
comedian Charlie Chaplin produced a comedic satire, The Great Dictator, which reflected Hitler's
endeavors. The film was released in 1941 and before its production, WWI ended and the Germans
sought out a scapegoat for their devastated economy. Due to this, Hitler rose to power by assigning
blame to the Jewish community. The Germans then committed awful acts on the Jewish population,
contributing to WWII. Through this all, Charlie Chaplin saw a reason to make a movie: waging war
against Hitler on the big screen. His film targeted anti–nazi audiences, leaving those who watched to
laugh at the Germans. In this movie, Chaplin focuses on the history surrounding Germany, but adds
his own twist as well. The two main characters are both played by himself. One is a poor barber, and
the other is the dictator of Germany, Hynkel. In the beginning, the barber saves the life of a man on
the last day of WWl. Immediately after, he's admitted into a hospital and stays in a coma for the next
20 years. When the barber wakes up, he is in the middle of the Holocaust. Later, the man he saved
turns out to be a Nazi, and helps warn off fellow soldiers from bothering the barber. Regardless of
his friends wishes, the town becomes overrun with Nazis and is no longer safe. As a result, his
friend decides to help him escape. Soon after they take off, the barber is mistaken for Hynkel. He
has to give a speech to

The Great Dictator Essay
My group decided to recreate Charlie Chaplin's last scene in The Great Dictator. In the final scene,
the barber is disguised as "Hitler" and is asked to give a speech in front of thousands. Unprepared
and nervous the barber makes his way to the podium and gives a heartfelt speech about how we
should all unite instead of fighting each other. After the speech is given the barber is seen exhausted,
while the crowd goes wild. The scene itself uses so many different filming techniques. The scene
featured used height to to keep the speaker and the audience almost eye to eye. It's implication was
to make it so it seem as if the speaker and the audience were having a conversation. It also featured
a close shot types to keep the audience focused on ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The barber says things such as "Greed has poisoned men's souls"(Capra), or "Our knowledge has
made us cynical"(Capra). With both of these techniques in use, the speech could be seen as an
effective piece of propaganda. While in our scene we decided to change the topic from "Nazis" to a
more modern threat: ISIS. With this piece we decided to keep everything faithful besides the subject
of the speech. But overall we keep the pacing, the structure, and the delivery of the speech mostly
the same. We had the barber walk up to the podium looking and nervous and uncertain. He then
gave the audience a heartfelt speech about how the people need to band together and stop ISIS. The
scene then ends with the barber looking spent and exhausted. We used the same basic film
techniques as the film: The rule of thirds,Height, and Shot Type, and just to name a few. We also
tried to appeal to system 1 by making it simple and easy for people to understand. Also Hitler had
pointed that propaganda must be simple and understandable by even the dimmest of

Charles Spencer Chaplin was definitely a man that brought a smile to everyone's face that watched
him. Charlie Chaplin was born on April 15, 1889, in London, England to the couple Charles
Chaplin, Sr., and Hannah Hill (Lynn, Kenneth, pg.376). Chaplin's goal was to achieve the title of the
most famous person in the world. And he was willing to do anything to reach that goal. When
Charlie's mother fell sick, he sang for her on stage at the age of five. Everyone in the audience loved
him and showered their money onto the stage. He was also really loved by the audience at the time,
when Chaplin was eight, and he appeared in a dancing act called "Eight Lancashire Lads"(A.Kn,
pg.94). Charlie was excited with the attention that he received. And so he stepped into the industry
when half–brother, Sidney, also his agent, got Chaplin a contract at the London Hippodrome, when
Charlie was ten years old. Within a few years Charlie was among the most popular child artists in
England. Charlie's father died because of alcoholism in St. Thomas Hospital in London, on May 9th,
1901, when Charlie was only twelve years old. His father was thirty–seven ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He stayed with them up until 1913, and then in the May of 1913, Charlie signed a contract with
Adam Wessel, who was also interested in Keystone Films. Charlie signed with him for a $125 a
week and then on December 29, 1913, Chaplin signed with Keystone Films for $150 a week.
Chaplin made his first feature film, in the January of 1914, "Making a Living". Charlie worked with
the Keystone Films throughout 1914, until November when he signed a contract with Essanay
Films, where he made $1,250 a week, and where he also had to make 14 films, during the year of
1915. Chaplin's first movie where he was not just featuring was "The Tramp" where he was the
"tramp". His character was a small man, with a black moustache and a funny

Great Words In The Great Dictator, By Charlie Chaplin
Great words spoken by a truly great man in his speech from The Great Dictator. Charlie Chaplin
expressed a single idea that summed up a single and painful period in history, "We all think too
much and feel too little." As much as people expected from me I can't help but wonder what it
would have been like to grow up during the time that the streets were filled with the sound of swing.
A moment of time where I could escape to and feel free from my burdens that weigh heavy on my
shoulders. This is a place that I can think about to avoid the scar that covers most of my heart.
My scar wasn't a wound that happened in an instant, but instead it was a wound that was cut over
time. Some of the cuts were shallow while others felt they would ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
I could smell it all around me as it clung to my skin and lingered on my clothes. It was a rancid
smell that made my day turn sour. As I did my mental checklist that I do every morning as I get
ready for the day my mood did not change, because no amount of perfume was going to cover the
smell of my open wound that was festering in my chest. I began to pace around the room that began
to suffocate me with the stench, but I was too afraid to leave. I knew that day was not a day I could
face the mirror that hung on the back of my door. The 'Gatekeeper' to my room that allows anyone to
enter, but denies me the option to leave. It's a struggle to face him everyday, but I needed to face that
challenge. My steps were slow and cautious trying to avoid looking at him I slowly preparing for a
battle that I had already lost. When my eyes meet my reflection I froze on the spot. They (eyes)
scanned over my body and judged as the voices filled my head like battle cries. The voices of my
past insecurities and the words of others having a showdown in my mind. "You're too skinny," going
against "You're so pretty," or "It must be nice to be that little...". Outside of that a major battle was
going on that shouting above the rest, "You have the ideal body type. Every guy must want you."
fighting against, " Why am I so lonely?" I felt my body with my hands as I went over everything I
disliked about it, everything that I disliked about

Charlie Chaplin The Great Dictator Analysis
The Great Dictator made in 1940, written, produced, and directed, by Charlie Chaplin: was then a
controversial film because it exposed Nazism and anti–Semitism with humor. The film is composed
of some silent film's methods such as muted gestures, and mimes, but this film was Chaplin's first
true sound film. Chaplin's film was a stroke of genius, he interprets the horrors happening in
Germany throughout WWII in an ironic but also elegant way. In the film, the main subject is Adolf
Hitler and the rise of European fascism.
I found the film meaningful, it was a controversial topic back then. I believe the film did far greater
good than harm because it encourages independent thought. Chaplin's ability to be serious was not
limited to his humor, yet he intelligently transports the sadistic nature of the event portrayed in the
film and the monstrosities of the Holocaust. "The Great Dictator", was the representation of the war
and dictatorship. I think it's a good thing to make light of something like the Nazis because it
provides one of the most effective ways to examine basic moral issues without the negative
commutation.
The Holocaust was a tragedy that occurred because of the immense power the Nazis had.
Individuals, governments, and organizations made choices that induced legalized discrimination,
prejudice, mass murder, and hatred. The film was directed in a way that allows the viewers to get an
idea of the amount of power Hitler had over Germany. Chaplin's object was

Rhetorical Analysis Of The Great Dictator
Has greed taken over the world so much? To the point where other humans take over someone else's
life, because it makes people feel better about themselves? Have humans taken away the basic
human rights of other people to gain control over the world. In Charlie Chaplin's film, The Great
Dictator, he gives a speech when they call him dictator of the world, and although he may have just
been acting, his words rang true. Everyone has to fight for freedom, untie to free the world, to
progress together, to free all men. This is a very effective speech, because it capture the audience
attention, and in a way plays with their emotions, almost tricking them into believing every word
that Charlie Chaplin says is the truth.He makes great points about why the world should work ...
Even though this speech was given in the 1930's, it highlights the main problems that are wrong
with the world. In his speech, Charlie Chaplin knew how to reach the audience's emotions by
connecting himself to the words he was saying. Charlie Chaplin showed the emotion he had through
his facial features, and the way his voice varied throughout his speech. He also reached his audience
by telling them they have the power to change and free the world, and he actually believed it. He
uses many rhetorical devices, such as, addressing the soldiers directly after they had already been to
war telling them not to give into brutes (figure of speech), "I should like to help everyone, jew,
gentile, black, and white" (repetition), and "as long as men die, liberty will never perish"
(parallelism). He uses repetition of words to get his point across, and parallelism to show how our
liberty is not really free, gaining his audience's attention. "As long as men die, liberty will never
perish." this quote is saying as long as there are men fighting for our freedom, their will be freedom
and

What Is The Effect Of The Movie The Great Dictator
The movie "The Great Dictator" is based on World War I, where the protagonist Hannah (Chaplin)
was fighting in the army of the Tomania, who also resembled Hynkel (Chaplin), who eventually
became the Dictator of Tomania. After a series of events, Hannah the soldier was mistaken for the
Dictator and Hynkel was arrested by his own soldiers. In this speech, before the assembled crowd of
Tomania, Hannah denounces everything that Hynkel stands for and made a rousing plea for
democracy. Chaplin started his speech with great humility and pain, in the words "I am sorry, I don't
want to be an emperor. That's not my business." He was pained by the long lasting acrimonious
effect of the continuous war, which was creating more and more dictators. Addressing

The Great Dictator 's Speech By Charlie Chaplin
In "The Great Dictator's Speech" spoken by Charlie Chaplin, a famous actor in the early 20th
century, seems to talk about the evils in the world and how mankind should all unite and make peace
with one another without the need for war, death, and petty rivalries. However, the goal of the
speaker in this speech actually points towards his desire to gain power, which he will then abuse as
it is written in the name," The Great Dictators Speech." The main purpose of the speech itself is to
inform people and all of humanity has the power of themselves rather than a dictator. In other
words: Freedom and peace in the world. Chaplin's character talks of how man has fallen, succumbed
to greed and misery, which then turns into war and bloodshed. He uses this to convince people they
all must set aside their differences to unite as one to prevent future struggles in the world. In his first
quote Chaplin says,"We all want to help one another. human beings are like that. We want to live by
each other's happiness– not by each other's misery. We don't want to hate and despise one another. In
this world there is room for everyone." He is stating in this text that the world would be a better
place should people work together and exercise the love of looking out for one another. If men
weren't so preoccupied with greed and self gratification, negative emotions like hate and misery
would cease. The next quote states," The hate of men will pass, and dictators will die, and the power
they

The Final Speech Analysis : Sir Charles Spencer
The Final Speech Analysis Sir Charles Spencer "Charlie" Chaplin, was known as an English comic
actor, filmmaker, and composer who rose to fame during the era known as silent film, and also
wrote one of the greatest speeches ever written. It is during his speech, in the movie "The Great
Dictator", released in 1941, that Chaplin gives one of the most memorable speeches that is still
conversed about in the present, and has in the past year been trending on social media due to its'
undeniable relevance towards today's social issues. As with today the turmoil over the election, our
current elected president and the way social media is led to perceive the views of the Republican
Party. The purpose of this speech is to convey the idea that even ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He goes on to say that, "We all want to help each other. Human beings are like that. We want to live
by each other's happiness – not by each other's misery." Chaplin states this so that he may appeal to
everyone and anyone in all walks of life. It is a social convention people just want to have the ability
to live their life with others in a peaceful and joyful state. Mr. Charles Chaplin continues saying, "...
earth is rich and can provide for everyone. The way of life can be free and beautiful, but we have
lost our way," furthering the point that humans want to ultimately coexist, without the threat of
violence and Chaplin believes the world was created in a way that enables us to do just that. The
only problem is that the memory of how to do such a thing has absconded from many people's
minds. "Greed has poisoned men's souls...goose–stepped us into misery and bloodshed." Here Mr.
Chaplin is able to expertly use slang that the audience understands and associates with. This is the
reason Chaplin gives for the ability to cohabitate having been forgotten. Over time, "machinery that
gives us abundance has left us in want." We can obtain all the essentials that are needed to live so
very easily that our minds have been conditioned to think we are in need of

Analysis Of The Great Dictator Charlie Chaplin
The 'Great Dictator' written and directed by Charlie Chaplin is a film that circles around two
characters, which are both played by Chaplin. The movie begins in a time and place similar to one
where Hitler had risen to power, and started his annihilation of the Jews. Chaplin plays both the
amnesiac Jewish barber and Hynkel (Hitler), the dictator of Tomainia. Hynkel though a powerful
and ruthless dictator is often shown to be comically dwarfed both in height and intelligence. His
right–hand commander, or trash guy, seems to be the one behind some of his plans. He compliments
Hynkel with words of praise then proceeds to hint at ways to destroy the Jews, and take over the
neighboring states. But as the film progresses, we see how Chaplin portrays Hynkel as being utterly
ridiculous; the man cannot seem to do anything without growing angry at his own incompetence.
Movies like this, and a similar film, 'Inglorious Bastards', portray Hitler as a man who in the face of
death or immediate anger will quiver and blubber nonsense or the next second muster enough anger
to rant as loud as possible (ex: "Cheese and Crackers!) I think Chaplin did good capturing the
Fuhrer's mannerisms in such an ironic way. Some of his mannerisms include the feeble, affected
hand–salute; Inclination for striking ludicrous attitudes; The fabulous fits of rage and violent facial
contortions.
There were many themes I noticed in the film, and one of the most prevalent themes was the use of
satire. The use of humor and exaggeration provided a constant comic relief from the actual reality of
what was going on during this time. Although he did state at one point that he was unaware, or not
fully aware of Adolf's actions and intentions. According to an article, Chaplin wrote in his biography
that he 'regretted making the "The Great Dictator:" "Had I known of the actual horrors of the
German concentration camps, I could not have made the Great Dictator; I could not have made fun
of the homicidal insanity of the Nazis." I found it interesting that in a way his film was
foreshadowing history itself. At the beginning of the film, the detective missile continues to aim at
the Jewish soldier, no matter how many times he changes directions. It felt like

Research Paper On The Assassination Of Julius Caesar
Joseph Amaral
Mr. Cheney
9th grade lit/comp.
05 December 2017
The Assassination Of Julius Caesar Despite the fears of becoming a harsh dictator, the assassination
of Julius Caesar was unjust because Caesar brought peace to rome, he was killed for no reason, and
he had great ideas that would benefit the roman empire. Caesar was born to a very poor family, and
through hard work he moved up the ranks in politics, and became the "dictator in perpetuity" of
rome. He had a short one year of serving as the dictator before his assassination. Julius Caesar
brought peace to rome by winning many battles, and having great leadership skills. He defended
rome from many Germanic tribes, and conquered a lot of territory from them. After defeating
pompey

Charlie Chaplin Stereotypes
Charlie Chaplin has directed over thirty films. He is known for humanizing characters, making them
more realistic. In the year of 1925, he directed and starred in arguably his most famous film, The
Gold Rush. Humanization plays a huge roll in this movie. Most movies all seem to have characters
that we like to call stereotypes. Characters that are known in movies, but not really known in real
society. This even started in 1920's as we date back to characters like "Americas sweetheart" and
"vamps" in film. Charlie Chaplin plays a role as a little tramp. We see that he is a very kindhearted,
hardworking, and odd character. He is short, he has a thick dark mustache, and he isn't the best
looking. Chaplin humanizes this character into a role that

Essay On The Great Dictator
The Great Dictator and The war "Life is a tragedy when seen in close–up, but a comedy in long–
shot." ― Charles Chaplin A tramp, a gentleman, a poet, a dreamer, a lonely fellow, a great
humanitarian, always hopeful of romance and adventure, Charlie Chaplin gave more than immense
to the film industry by his weird tips and tricks of directing the movie and his hotshots. His bravo
skills in acting and his passion for his work made his iconic figure of "Charlie Chaplin" from
Charles Chaplin (who is a lesser known guy apparently). He believed in human values and was
against the concept of war. He being an aficionado of black humour, made a tragic comedy 'The
Great Dictator' (1940) and went on to two other war driven comedies, 'Shoulder Arms' (1918) ...
This is sufficient to lead a happy peaceful life and doesn't even require terrorizing anyone with
cannonades and bullets. When nature provided us things for free, why to go all tacky and choose the
modus operandi of killing people for power just to earn more which is not helping us in any way?
Paradoxically, with power should come responsibility– which should be naively used for the
betterment of mankind. Greed is the root of all evil deeds. It has poisoned our sane minds and
caressing souls and left us frenzied about conflicting pain to humanity. We are living in cocoons,
hiding our real selves and forgetting our human values. Man has created technology for easier living
of mankind, but now technology is slowly dominating over mankind. Our knowledge has made us
cynical. We think a lot but just feel too little. More than machinery, we need humanity; more than
cleverness, we need kindness and gentleness. Without these qualities, life will be violent and all will
be lost. He had a negative notion of industrialization and its dehumanizing effects on man and thus
was against mechanization as it snatched the human dignity. He emphasized on the human vales
again and again, as the people tend to forget them in this world and do deadly things at the cost of
mankind. Technology has also been a boon to mankind, as distances have reduced we can travel
from one place to another whenever and wherever we want with

How Does Charlie Chaplin Use Satire In The Great Dictator
The propaganda offered in the 1940s was very effective, due to the manipulative tactics used by
creators and the easily influenced population of America. Take the movie "The Great Dictator" for
instance. In this movie, Charlie Chaplin uses satirical and ironic themes in order to portray the real
meaning about World War 2.Throughout the film, Chaplin tries to convey the theme that, people
with the power to create amazing things and do amazing things (make machinery, philosophy,
breakthrough discoveries) shouldn't use that power in order to fight over who is better. This can be
seen in both of the characters he plays. By using this theme and satirical strategy, Chaplin makes the
Nazi Party and Hitler himself look like fools. Chaplin has used a parody on the way Hitler speaks,
orders his followers, and how he acts towards the Jewish populations, in which Hitler is seen to be
like a child with a lot of power; in which in reality, his generals are seen to be doing most of the
work, while Hitler is seen to just be ordering people around constantly, even for smaller tasks. The
producers of this film use the scenes of parody and irony to provide propaganda against the Nazi
Party; thus showing American society that what the Nazi's are doing is both bad and ridiculous,
which also justifies the need to stop fighting, through the use of war. However, during Chaplin's
final speech, he discusses the necessary movement of stopping war and working together to solve
problems, if we claim to have the amazing power to win a war.

Imagine being a kid, losing your father to alcoholism, experiencing your own mother breaking down
on stage, and having to live place to place. Having been born to two troubled parents, Charlie
Spencer Chaplin started his career at a young age and built himself up. Starting his career in The
Eight Lancashire Lads, Chaplin was able to let his name be known to dignitary people. His
enthusiasm to rise up from the gutters amazes me, as not many can do as much as he did for himself.
Charlie was born on April 16, 1889 in London, England to Lily Harley, and Charles Chaplin Sr. His
parents split up when he was young, due to his mother's affair with Leo Dryden. Since the break off,
Lily had a breakdown on stage during one of her plays, her health was declining, thus resulting in
hardships. Without the income that acting gave Hannah, she would have troubles paying everything
she needed to. Her ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
According to, (grab citation)is a 32 minute film is about a woman mistaking her husband for The
Tramp. Beginning at a rail way station, we learn that the wife and husband are waiting to board the
train; when the train leaves, the Tramp appears. Chaplin created this character while with Fred
Karno, during the film Kid Auto Races at Venice. The Idle Class mainly focuses on the humor of
facial resemblance and doppelgängers. After the completion of this movie, Chaplin decided to take a
vacation. When Chaplin was done with his vacation, he went onto produce 11 more movies until he
eventually ended his career with his only color movie. According to the Charlie Chaplin website, he
then created A Woman of Paris, The Gold Rush, The Circus, City Lights, Modern Times, The Great
Dictator, Monsieur Verdoux, Limelight, A King in New York, and A Countess from Hong Kong. Of
these movies, IMDb rates City Lights as number two. This collection of movies take place from

The Great Dictator ( 1940 ) And The Interview ( 2014 )
Many films that make a mockery of dictators have been released over the years, but two of those
films stand out for how accurate their parodies are in reality, that stands up to a known oppressor.
These two films are The Great Dictator (1940) and The Interview (2014). These two films share the
comedic twist of Classical Hollywood Narrative to outline their story. Unlike many other films
mocking a dictator these two films create a parody of a known figure in modern history to
demoralize each despot for the good of the oppressed society. Outside of the film itself, they share a
severe backlash upon release that involves bombings, cyber–attacks, and bans on both films. The
following discussion will examine how the similarities in the techniques employed by each
filmmaker during development helped to strengthen each film's satiric impact, while also causing
each film to incur a similarly harsh and violent reception upon debut.
By 1938 Chaplin was one of the greatest writers, directors and actors in the film industry, well
known for his socioeconomic and political satire within The United States. He felt so confident in
his ability in mocking the world's most dangerous man that he was willing to spend $1.5 million of
the $2 million budget. The two differences in this later film from his earlier work were the
introduction of sound in films and the disappearance of his reoccurring protagonist "The Little
Tramp". Chaplin's use of sound in this film was a huge factor in history, not

Essay on charlie chaplin
What a little tramp! Charlie Chaplin, who brought laughter to millions worldwide as the silent
"Little Tramp" clown. Born in East Street, Walworth, London on 16 April, 1889,
Charles
Spencer Chaplin was the son of a music hall singer and his wife. Charlie Chaplin's parents divorced
early in his life, with his father providing little to no support, either financial or otherwise, leaving
his mother to support them as best she could. Chaplin's mother Hannah was the brightest spot in
Charlie's childhood; formerly an actress on stage, she had lost her ability to perform, and managed
to earn a subsistence living for herself, Charlie, and Charlie's older half–brother Sidney by sewing.
She was an integral part of Charlie's young ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Charlie was a lifelong pacifist, but he was also a realist who saw that the aggression of the Axis
powers had to be stopped. In many ways, Chaplin was politically naive –– such as speaking at fund
raisers for the Communist USSR, whom Chaplin simply saw as our allies in the fight. And by
suggesting that America immediately open a two front war to help our "friends" in the
Soviet Union. These were some of the reasons that the government began keeping tabs on the
immigrant film maker. Although he worked for all of these years in America, he maintained his
British citizenship, and had no intention of becoming an American citizen.
Moreover, due to the false rumors that Chaplin was a communist or communist sympathizer, as well
as an organized protest by various unions resulting in theaters refusing to show his films. Charlie
took a vacation to England, wanting to show his new wife and children his native country. Upon
leaving the territorial waters of the United States of America, Charlie
Chaplin received a cable, informing him that the State Department had rescinded his reentry permit
–– effectively locking him out of the country as an undesirable alien. There were many reasons for
this –– Chaplin's unorthodox political views, the false accusation that he was a
Communist, and not least of all, money. There would have been an attempt by the federal
government to seize Chaplin's assets, which were enormous. However, his wife Oona returned to

Analysis Of The Great Dictator And Alphaville
Movie is a medium to express the ideology of the time. Different movies from different time may
show different central ideas because of the different political and social environment. The social
settings decide the central ideas of the movie and the image shown in the movie. Therefore, social
environment is an important factor to consider when analyzing a movie. This essay uses The Great
Dictator and Alphaville as examples to show how the political and social environment influence the
central ideas of serious movies.
The movie Alphaville tells the audience a story of liberation through "the genres of dystopian
science fiction and film noir". The secret agent Lemmy Caution sneaks into Alphaville, a city
controlled by artificial ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Indeed, when receiving the invitation from the generals, the action of the Jewish barber is so
unnatural that the audience will burst into laughter. In Alphaville, the factors of black comedy are
implicit, but the audience can still notice some humorous details in this movie. For example, the life
of people in Alphaville is so absurd and ridiculous that can be considered as humorous. The
audience can feel the unnatural in such an unrealistic setting. As for the degree of fun, The Great
Dictator more satisfies the genre of a "comedy".
To dig out the central idea of a movie, the audience should pay attention the themes and symbolism
the movies try to portray. The Alphaville shows the audience a dystopian picture. Alphaville is a city
controlled by the A.I. Alpha 60, there is no democracy nor freedom here. When Johnson kills
professor von Braun and destroys Alpha 60, he gives the city a rebirth. This movie presents a
fustigation to the totalitarianism and a yearning for free will. How about The Great Dictator? This
movie presents a similar picture. The Hynkel in this movie is similar to the Alpha 60 in Alphaville.
The speech given by the Jewish barber in the ending of the movie shows a desire for freedom and
democracy. Of course, The Great Dictator shows something more. It advocates for sympathy to the
Jewish group, which suffers misfortune in WWII.
For any serious movie, its image and central idea depend on the time and social environment when

An Exploration Of The Great Dictator
Running head: AN EXPLORATION OF THE GREAT DICTATOR (1940) 1 AN EXPLORATION
OF THE GREAT DICTATOR (1940) 2 An Exploration of Charlie Chaplin 's Influences, Symbolism,
and Use of Sound in The Great Dictator (1940) Vincent G. Foisy Cleveland State University. An
Exploration of Charlie Chaplin?s Influences, Symbolism, and Use of Sound in The Great Dictator
(1940) In the early 1900?s, Charlie Chaplin became one of the most famous filmmakers in American
history. His clumsy portrayal of The Little Tramp in many silent pictures led to him becoming a
household name by 1917; his vast writing and directing career was just getting started. By the 1930?
s, sound had taken over the silver screen; however, Chaplin refused to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
By this time, Chaplin, a vocally political anti–fascist, had expressed his dislike for Germany?s
Fuhrer and had been working on The Great Dictator since 1937 (Cole, 2001). Despite this, Chaplin
was pressured ?either to render the images and message of his film inoffensive to Hitler and
Mussolini, which meant eliminating any anti–fascist propaganda element, or else to drop the project
altogether? from the start of his work on the film (Cole, 2001). Until this point in time, the American
cinema had ignored Hitler?s presence and actions, as propaganda films were still slightly looked
down upon, due to their misuse during World War I (Cole, 2001). Perhaps another reason for
Chaplin?s public dislike of Hitler, was that his wife at the time, Paulette Goddard, was herself
Jewish (Brownlow & Kloft, 2002). In the film itself, Chaplin shows many events that reflect the
reality of late 1930?s Germany including most prominently the treatment of the Jewish people
through representations of anti–semitic graffiti and an event reminiscent of Kristallnacht. In the
early scenes of the Jewish ghetto, the windows all have painted graffiti reading "Jew" (Sherman,
2002). During the beginning of Jewish persecution in Germany, it was not uncommon for Nazis and
Nazi sympathizers to paint anti–semitic texts on to the windows of Jewish–owned shops and homes.
Through enormous set pieces, innovative camera work, and great attention to detail, Chaplin was

The Great Dictator Satire
The 1940 film, "The Great dictator" written, directed, produced, and starring Charlie Chaplin is a
prime example of a political satire. The film was made to primarily satirize Adolf Hitler, Benito
Mussolini, anti semitism and fascism. Throughout the movie, many different satirical devices are
used, but one key device used by Chaplin is over exaggeration. In "The Great Dictator" over
exaggeration is used during Hynkel's speeches every time he speaks German, the various ways that
Hynkel and Napolini are each trying to claim power over the other, and the scene in which Hynkel is
glOBE THINF Chaplin greatly satirizes Hitler in "The Great Dictator" and one tactic he uses is to
over exaggerate the German language. He does this by saying random

Satirical Comedy In Charlie Chaplin's The Great Dictator
The Great Dictator is a satirical comedy about the dictator of Tomainia, Adenoid Hynkel, and what
happens when he attempts to expand his empire, and ultimately conquer the world. Hynkel's story
parallels the story of a poor Jewish barber as he tries to avoid persecution from Hynkel's regime.
The plot of this movie was meant to satirically mirror the events that were happening in the real
world after WWI. When Charlie Chaplin began production on The Great Dictator, the war had yet to
begin. In fact, he had already finished the bulk of the filming before Hitler had begun his blitzkrieg
of Europe. Charlie has stated that if he knew of Hitler's appalling actions, he would have never
produced the film in the first place. During the time of the films release, motion pictures were
popular due to their ability to entertain and distract citizens from what was going on in their lives.
Mass audiences watched films in the cinema in order to feel moved, entertained, distracted, or even
persuaded. With this in mind, we can look at The Great Dictator as a piece of persuasive media
meant to sway the audience toward a democratic view of society. As you may be able to tell from
Chaplin's film, he is an anti–fascist. This was expressed consistently throughout the film. For
example, Hynkel's tumble down the stairs after his mock–speech blatantly represents Chaplin's
feelings towards Hitler by using physical, slap–stick comedy. Another example of this is the speech
itself. Chaplin was clearly

Nazi Symbols In The Great Dictator, By Charlie Chaplin
In Charlie Chaplin's movie, The Great Dictator, Chaplin imposes a comic element in order to
denounce the Nazi power and Adolf Hitler with a light touch. Through this satirical movie, Chaplin
is trying to enlighten the audience on how heinous Adolf Hitler was. When this movie was initially
released to the public, many people in the world were not fully aware of Hitler's atrocities. This film
became very controversial because people began to realize the resemblance between the character
Adenoid Hynkel, the despotic dictator of Tomainia, and Hitler. Chaplin cleverly used this comedic
film to appropriate Hitler and his regime as the antagonists. The audience is able to discern scenes
and details where Chaplin purposely subverts common Nazi symbols ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Ultimately, the barber is mistakenly identified as the dictator by others. This leads to the crux of the
film where barber is given the opportunity to speak before the entire country, impersonating the
dictator. Initially, the barber starts of the final speech in an unobtrusive manner by speaking rather
softly and plainly. However, as he progresses through his speech, he becomes noticeably more
confident and passionate about his words. He shares his vision of an ideal society where there is no
hostility between people of different backgrounds. He envisions freedom and unity in the world.
There were often palpable moments in which the intensity of Chaplin's speech and delivery has fully
encapsulated the audience. The delivery of this speech is strikingly different from that of Hynkel's in
the beginning of the film. In this speech, Hynnkel is portrayed as a nonsensical, doltish, barbaric
leader. Due to the fact that his speech consisted of babble, animal sounds, and random English and
German words, it had to be translated by a clear male narrator in English. Chaplin uses this
exaggeration to mimic Hitler's style of speech, insinuating that Hitler use of militancy is

Film Revolution : Charlie Chaplin : Film Revolutionary
Chaplin: Film Revolutionary
A revolutionary idea are certain movements that change life as we know it entirely, take for example
the revolutionary idea of a film. There would be no film if it were not for it's forefathers such as
photography, pictures drawn on caves, yet still dating back to the time of story telling. None of these
implicit ideas would be able to be born without the Humans that set off these chains of events. An
important influence in Film is 1940's celebrity, Charlie Chaplin, by using this art form to create
silent films to evoke political questioning, and renovation
Chaplin's specialty in film was the art of silent films, an area in which intricate forms of pantomime
must be performed in order to deliver the story toward the audience. When the film was introduced
to sound, Chaplin felt as if he was being confined, "If I did make a talking picture, no matter how
good I was I could never surpass the artistry of my pantomime... If I talked I would become like any
other comedian." This new technology started to cage up Chaplin's abilities since the use of sound
meant that there would be certain restrictions in the way the actor is allowed to move, and the
unnatural sound of their voices due to the need of over articulation for the microphone to pick up the
sound. It comes to no surprise why Chaplin was so offended by the new movement and renovations
that came to revolutionize the film industry itself, the fusion between film and sound. Though
Chaplin was

Speech In Charlie Chaplin's The Great Dictator
The scene our group selected from Charlie Chaplin's The Great Dictator shows Chaplin giving a
speech about why the people should not give into the power of dictators. One technical aspect that
was emulated from Chaplin's speech was the use of dialogue. Chaplin begins his speech negatively,
softly, and calmly. In the beginning of Chaplin's speech, he speaks in a negative tone: "We all want
to help one another. Human beings are like that. We want to live by each other's happiness – not by
each other's misery. We don't want to hate and despise one another. The way of life can be free and
beautiful, but we have lost the way" (Chaplin 0:00:14– 0:32). Chaplin explains how human beings
should behave. From 2:00:44 Chaplin gradually gets louder, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
From 1:58:54 until 2:00:13 the camera is up close to Chaplin and shows him above the arms, taking
up most of the viewing space, making it seem like he is directly talking to the viewer. Then from
2:00:23–2:01:23 Chaplin is shown from the waist above. Then at 2:01:23 the camera zooms onto
Chaplin and shows only his arms and above. The purpose of the scene is to ensure that the viewer
will remember the speech and see how passionate Chaplin is while giving the speech to the viewer.
In the first minute and eleven seconds of the speech, it starts off in a negative and calm tone about
how Maumee Valley does not live up to the expectation that students have the right to leave trash all
over the school. Then it gradually transitions into a positive, hopeful tone for how Maumee Valley
students can help Maumee Valley live up to expectation. Finally, in the final fifty–one seconds in the
speech, Wyatt provides a solution to how Maumee Valley can live up to its expectations. In the
speech, our group uses various events that have happened in the school and are well–known to both
the students and faculty, "the experience of familiarity has a simple but powerful quality of 'pastness'
that seems to indicate that it is a direct reflection of prior experience" (Kahneman 61). In our speech
we reference the incident of when Danny Wainstein found grapes in the vending machine, and the
many times plates and food trays have been found lying in the commons. The familiarity of these
events

The Great Dictator Satire
The polarizing views on dictatorships have spawned some of the greatest film, art, and literature
masterpieces of that past centuries. Whether it is questioning their morality, legality, or functionality,
works of art place dictatorships in the hot seat and attempt to pry them open in order to get to the
very core of their existence. Two films that spectacularly do this are Charlie Chaplin's The Great
Dictator and Jean–Luc Godard's Alphaville. Whether it is the always hilarious clumsy nature of
Charlie Chaplin or the eerie, inquisitive behavior of secret agent Lemmy Caution, both films
criticize dictatorships through a variety of cinematic devices. The Great Dictator, by Charlie
Chaplin, uses humor as a way to soften the tension surrounding ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Though Alphaville is not a black comedy, there are several points throughout the movie that can be
seen as humorous to the viewer. These rare points, although subtle, reflect the idea that the city of
Alphaville itself and what is stands for is one big joke in the eyes of Jean–Luc Godard. One instance
where humor is introduced in the film is when LemmyCaution meets up with Henri Dickson at a
local hotel. Dickson, joined by a seductress, takes Caution up to his room to chat. After they are
done discussing their secret business, Dickson retires to the bedroom with the seductress to relieve a
little stress. What is funny about this scene is that Dickson, a secret agent who's job is to uncover the
unseen, doesn't even realize that Caution is still in the room. He is embarrassing himself in the way
he talks to the seductress and the way he acts around her. The scene then takes the humor to the next
level when Caution takes out his camera and begins to take pictures of Dickson and the seductress.
It would be one thing if Caution had a camera with no flash or only took one picture of Dickson;
instead his camera has a very bright flash and he takes close to 10 pictures of Dickson. This scene is
hilarious because once again Dickson, who is a secret agent and should be very keen at noticing the
world around him, does not realize that he is being watched at photographed by Caution. Although
this film is quite different from The Great Dictator in the sense the there is not comedy around every
corner, the tiny bits of humor like the Dickson bedroom scene and two scientists being named
Heckle and Jeckle (the names of two cartoon birds) provide with viewer with some comedic relief. T
hese scenes are also important because they reassure the viewer that the director's intention is to
criticize the

The Great Dictator And No Regrets For Our Youth
There were three films we saw in class; these three films were made during political and social
change in their respective countries. The three films have a similar style and it helped people to cope
with this reality. These films represent the political social freedom of speech. First, The Great
Dictator, a film with humor, was made at the beginning of World War II when Charlie Chaplin spoke
for the first time representing different characters to prove his opposition against Nazism and
mocking Hitler. His humoristic film relieves political stress over society. Next, No Regrets For Our
Youth, a sentimental film, was made at the end of World War II and represents a new generation
with new changes. The principal character projected the new style

Hitler Film Analysis

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Jacqueline Thomas

More from Jacqueline Thomas (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Hitler Film Analysis