Gun control advocate Sarah Brady’s infamous vow to “get rid of all the guns” has never been more prescient, as we enter a second term of the Obama administration – 18 months after Obama assured Brady during a White House meeting that gun control was “very much on his agenda.”

6. infowars magazine is published by Free Speech Systems, LLC. 12 times a year. All content within this magazine is Copyright Free Speech Systems, LLC. Permission to reprint original infowars articles in whole or in part is gladly
granted, provided full credit is given. Some articles are copyrighted by our contributing writers, so check to see if copyright free status applies. The articles appearing within this publication reflect the opinions and attitudes
of their respective authors and not necessarily those of the publisher, advertisers or editorial team. Subscriptions and Bulk orders are available online at www.infowarsshop.com or through customer service at 1-888-253-3139. To
receive a free electronic version of the magazine become an infowars insider by signing up at www.infowars.com/newsletter. For general information, advertising or editorial inquiries contact 512-646-4414 or ADVERTISING@infowars.com.
Publisher
Editor In Chief
Graphics
Contributing Writers
Contributing Artist
Advertising
Alex Jones
Molly Maroney
Carter Watkins
Molly Rogers
Inkmouf
Justin Wheeler
Rob Reeger
Molly Maroney
Kurt Nimmo
Paul Joseph Watson
Alex Jones
Steve Watson
Adan Salazar
Ron Paul
Jon Rappoport
Aaron Dykes
Melissa Melton
Mike Adams
Donna Anderson
Janee Meadows
Mear One
Will Jones
Derek Einkauf
Matt Williams
Russell Dowden

7. PRISONPLANET.COM
Please tell Alex that the founders
first created “Associations”. Those
were the meetings and not Tea Parties.
Please check George Mason’s history!!!
PLEASE! Then they wrote “resolutions” in the counties.
They then sent representatives to a convention to build
a new government (speaking of Virginia now because
they did it first) There they dissolved the House of Bur-
gess’s with George Mason’s Declaration of Rights which
lead the way to become Virginia’s Bill of Rights inside
of her constitution, 17 days later on June 29, 1776.
Jefferson had the rough copy from Mason via Richard
Henry Lee’s trip back to Philly. What we need to do
is create “associations for liberty” in each County, Town
and City. They then need to appoint representatives to
a determined state wide convention. This Convention
should be called a “Bill of Rights Restoration Conven-
tion.” The state can either abolish their parts of govern-
ment as Virginia has the power to or add that power
and certainly, anything for resetting their connections
to the Federal Government.
Vince Agnelli
Catlett, Virginia
Are you a zombie? Do the symbols and logos that de-
fine your very identity perhaps cause or trigger involun-
tary responses of hunger, fear, desire, and hatred? Will
you soon be attacking those pesky humans who don’t
conform to your hive mentality, who don’t eat your tasty
toxic food, who don’t love the television ‘programming’?
If you are not, then take heart my friend, for you are
the light out of the darkness that has fallen upon us.
You can see it in the masses – an almost indescribable
sense of despair and in the dull eyes. Epidemic levels
of obesity, depression, and stupidity are the new norm.
The human body, mind, and soul is under attack. There
is a very malignant force at work destroying our very
existence as a free and healthy people. We can all see
the symptoms, but finding the cause takes courage.
For thousands of generations our ancestors had to
fight, claw, and stay watchful in the night in order to
survive both natural and manmade dangers to life, lib-
erty, dignity, and sovereignty. And now we are told we
are a cancer – a species of virus that must be contained.
Your history has been erased, your opinions have been
manufactured, your idols have been created and de-
stroyed, and your children are being turned against
you. No amount of prescriptions and sedations will
make this dystopian nightmare go away, but there is a
beautifully human solution.
WAKE UP!
You are not a zombie! You are not a virus. You are not
defined by the material items shoved upon you. You are
not defined by your digital status, or your wage-slavery,
or your neat little box you are made to live in.
You may have been poisoned since birth, and lied to
until you believed it was good for you – but you can
wake up and rise out of your mental darkness! Stop
buying what they are selling. Question everything, in-
cluding history. Turn off the idiot box, use your brain
again, and live the enlightened and healthy life that so
many for so long struggled to pass on to you.
Paul Gray
Austin, Texas
EDITOR’S NOTE: Franchising opportunities will be
available soon. Inquire for more information about start-
ing a franchise in your community.
I have yet to get a subscription to the magazine. I see
you have given them away on the streets of Austin and
I’m so damn jealous...I live in Pittsburgh...and this city
would never have something like that...well unless I do
it. One thing...I am an avid Alex listener...I love and re-
spect him...I just would like for once to have a show or
showcase [talk about] the GOOD things that are hap-
pening in the cause for freedom: Tenth Amendment
Center, WeAreChange, you folks and more...I think it
would be good to see that it is working.
Paul Sampsell
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
The statement “Forever blessed is the good man,”
which was used by Logan Patrik Madaras, is iconic of the
man who believes in the spirit of goodness amongst men
which redeems. In an all too familiar future, that ideal is
amongst Logan’s greatest visions for all of us. When we
say these things, it is important to remind ourselves not
to abandon the reflections of our own selves in others,
for as Logan put it quite wisely, “The future is in all of
our hands while the destiny of Earth is in God we trust”.
So often we see pleas for help like those in section of
the magazine in our community. And so often, while we
know for sure there are corrupt things in our world, we
only know these things to ensure our own protection, and
as most of us now believe, protectionism is a gateway to
slavery. This will never be untrue so long as a man or
woman is a victim to something he or she cannot control.
I say this because recently, there was an Executive Order
by the President to allow security partnerships in the de-
fense of the homeland from the threat of Terrorism.
I hope all stay safe in the coming days, and that someone
reading this is rational enough to know that, as a Canadi-
an, it is impossible for me to be anything but complacent
in this manner as far as the U.S. security is concerned. I
only know that, because of that specific damage to the
American brain, my country will slowly become at risk
of the same damage, whereas we can all make a differ-
ence today.
Matthew
Canada
EDITOR’S NOTE: The magazine is available free online
via email when you sign up at www.infowars.com/news-
letter. Each viewer has alternative viewing options. How-
ever the easiest way to ensure you receive the magazine is
by subscription at www.infowarsshop.com.
I just wanted to say thank you for the free online is-
sues of the new Infowars magazine. Regrettably, I find
it impossible to read online and it just results in frustra-
tion when I attempt reading it on line. I would love to
have the paper copy but the price is just too costly for
me. Is there any possible way that the online magazine
could be formatted as a newsletter or in PDA format? I
would love to be able to read the new magazine.
Catherine Stevens
Freeport, Illinois
LETTERSTOTHEEDITOR
WE would like to invite you to write
a caption for the ‘what is obama
thinking?’ picture on the previous
page. we will pick the best caption
and publish it in the next issue. As
Always Please send questions and
comments to letters@infowars.com.
Please be sure to include name,
location and contact information in
your response.

10. Nothing special will happen on this day other
than lots of people meditating globally, which is, in
a way, a special thing all by itself. But the universe
isn’t coming to an end.
The day after the non-event, watch for the
mainstream media to blame “doomsday websites”
for claiming doomsday was going to occur. In truth,
most alternative websites are claiming nothing
much will happen on that day.
Watch for free speech to be increasingly called “hate
speech” when it criticizes the government or advocates
liberty. Watch for renewed efforts to censor internet sites
that advocate liberty and freedom. You may see Google
removing such sites from its search engine. YouTube
will get even more aggressive at banning videos that
teach liberty, and the mainstream media will continue
to pound propaganda into the minds of the mainstream
zombies, teaching them that people who believe in
liberty are somehow “terrorists.”
Pedophiles unite! Buoyed by the Obama surge, the
TSA will ramp up its hiring and begin building a literal
army of pedophiles, thieves and psychopaths which
will soon begin to appear across the USA running
roadside checkpoints.
I also predict that the vast majority of Americans are
now so brainwashed into a slave mentality that they will
gladly agree to TSA body cavity searches on the side of
In fact, the next four years will be a tumultuous
time for the free speech of those who criticize
government and Obama. At the same time, the
“free speech” of those who threaten conservatives
with violence will be completely tolerated, if
not encouraged. The rhetoric of violence is just a
preview of what’s coming in the physical realm.
The NDAA, of course, gives Obama the “right” to
pursue precisely those actions: No judge, no jury and
not even a warrant required!
the road in the name of “protecting us from terrorism.”
This isn’t mere conjecture. A new survey reveals
that roughly one third of Americans have already
surrendered their dignity to a slave-inducing police
state, and many would actually smile in the name of
“security” while they are being medically raped by the
TSA in the name of a completely fabricated “war on
terror” stolen straight out of the novel 1984.
Following the mass layoffs and slashing of employee
hours, the nation will begin to see yet more families and
individuals in a state of economic desperation.
This will inevitably lead to more crime as people
turn to theft to try to make ends meet. Watch for more
copper thefts as well as more emboldened hit-and-run
crime tactics (such as motorcycles being driven through
shopping malls, smashing jewelry store cases and
making off with the loot).
I predict you will see more vehicles smashing
through the front doors of retail stores, more home
burglaries and more muggings, especially in high-
population cities where Obama’s economic policies
have the most devastating impact. Right now,
Detroit is already a “war zone” where police warn
visitors not to enter the city, and Chicago will soon
join the ranks of cities where gangs run rampant,
outnumbering police by a wide margin.
Last year, Obama signed the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) executive order on
New Year’s Eve, cleverly burying news of the event
underneath New Year’s celebrations nationwide.
The NDAA gutted the Bill of Rights and turned
America into a bonafide police state, with no due
process, no Fifth Amendment, and no Bill of Rights. It
authorized secret arrests, secret kill lists of American
citizens, and endless secret prison detainment without
ever being charged with a crime, among other things. It
signified the complete destruction of the Bill of Rights,
and Obama signed it in secret.
This year, he’ll use a similar holiday cover to sign some
other devastating executive order that, for example,
criminalizes criticism of the government (or something
else similarly ridiculous).
written by MIKE ADAMS
INFOWARS.COM10

11. PRISONPLANET.COM
As Obamacare kicks in (2013 and 2014), employers will do three things to
avoid going bankrupt under the financial oppression of socialized health care:
1. FIRE more workers to reduce overall business size.
2. REDUCE workers’ hours to below the government mandated threshold for
health care.
3. OFFSHORE more jobs to other countries.
The net effect of this will be, predictably, millions more Americans out of work
or working two or three low-paying jobs, none of which actually provide them the
health care they were promised by Obama.
This is not a sure thing, but chances are that Fukushima’s
remaining structure will suffer a partial or total collapse within
the next year, causing an unprecedented release of radiation
that will reach U.S. shores.
This could happen at any moment, technically, thanks to
another earthquake or tsunami. Even a typhoon could cause
sufficient damage to topple a large fuel containment pool.
For some inexplicable reason, nuclear fuel pools are stored
above ground in the Fukushima facility, making them highly
susceptible to environmental damage.
Under Obama, food stamps and unemployment claims have already
experienced alarmingly worsening numbers. Watch for things to get even
worse as more Americans thrown out of work by the failed economic policies
of the Obama administration sign up for free food and paycheck entitlements
from the government.
This is part of the plan, of course: Gut the economy and make the population
entirely dependent on government. From there, it’s a slam-dunk to get elected
as a socialist or even a communist, and the U.S. economy begins to take on
the look of a nation like Venezuela or Argentina.
The U.S. government won’t be allowed to go bankrupt just
yet. Although it has run out of money yet again under the
insane debt spending blowout of Obama, the debt ceiling will
be raised yet again, and the Fed will print new money to keep
buying up U.S. debt.
The long-term effect of this compounding debt spiral is,
of course, financial suicide, but that doesn’t seem to occur
to today’s zombified voters who are really only concerned
with how many handouts they can get right NOW!
The droughts of 2012 will be felt via sticker shock at the
grocery stores beginning in the first quarter of 2013. Watch
for not just price increases on most products made with wheat
and corn, but also shrinking food package volumes so that
manufacturers deliver less food in a similar-looking package.
Manufacturers will “downsize” their packages, in other
words, while keeping prices the same. This is another way
food inflation hits home.
This is all the prelude to the coming “Cultural Revolution” in America,
where the political left will soon call for the mass culling of all
survivalists, independent farmers, and anyone who follows a lifestyle
of self-reliance. Individuality will be seen as a threat to the leftist
collective, and those who do now bow down to the power of the police
state will not only be arrested and terminated; the mainstream media
will CHEER the entire process through hate propaganda disguised as
“protecting America from terrorism.”
To help pull this off, a false flag event will almost certainly be staged
that depicts some hapless gun owner as a crazy person who poses a
threat to society. Watch for another Colorado-style mass shooting, or the
bombing of a government building followed by the immediate blaming
of a convenient patsy. All the usual suspects on talk radio will also
A REVOLUTION IS IN AMERICA’S FUTURE
11

12. be blamed for it: Alex Jones, Rush Limbaugh,
Michael Savage and so on.
There is little question now that those who believe in
the real America are sooner or later going to have to
take a stand against the Obammunism agenda and
the endless hoards of “useless eaters” who now only
exist to feed off the government (while confiscating
as much wealth from the producers as possible).
How and when this actually happens is anybody’s
guess, but it will likely take many years to
completely unfold.
I’ve always advocated non-violent revolutions via
the ballot box, but at this point it’s obvious that
those who suck the economy dry through never-
ending handouts are now the voting majority. They
now outnumber the innovators, the entrepreneurs
and the productive citizens of society. From here, it’s
only a downward spiral as citizens repeatedly vote
themselves more and more handouts until the entire
system collapses in both financial and cultural ruin.
As Ron Paul recently said, “America is far gone.”
“We’re over the cliff,” Ron Paul recently said on
Bloomberg Television. “People do not want anything
cut. They want all the bailouts to come. They want
the Fed to keep printing the money. And they don’t
believe that we’ve gone off the cliff or are close to
going off the cliff. They think we can patch it over,
that we can somehow come up with some magic
solution. But you can’t have a budgetary solution
if you don’t change what the role of government
should be. As long as you think we have to police
the world and run this welfare state, all we are
going to argue about is who will get the loot.”
WHAT YOU CAN DO TO PROTECT
YOURSELF DURING THIS SLOW TRAIN
WRECK AND RISE OF TERRIBLE EVIL?
Preventing the total economic destruction of
America will now require a Ron Paul Revolution,
where tens of millions of Americans march
in the streets and demand an end to out-of-
control government and all its evils. Yet, the
U.S. government has designated the very act of
marching in the streets as an “act of terrorism,” so
these protests would almost immediately escalate
into a shooting war.
We are nowhere near the point where the
population at large is awake enough to engage in
such actions, by the way. Things are going to get
much worse before they get better.
The next four years are going to be like watching
an economic train wreck in super-slow motion,
augmented by bursts of police state activity,
censorship clamp-downs and of course increased
government confiscation of everything you own:
Land, money and even formerly private companies.
Today, we are living in an occupied nation, where
the vast majority of those who claim to be running
the country are, in reality, enemies of the state. They
are dismantling, day by day, America’s economy,
America’s workforce, America’s industries and even
American pride. What will be left in four more
years will be nothing but a shadow of the great
America we once knew.
Mike Adams is a natural health award-winning
journalist and the editor of www.naturalnews.com.

13. We discovered nearly every whey protein powder is heated. Heat damages proteins, rendering them
useless, even harmful to your body. Don’t waste another dollar on inferior whey protein. Learn exactly
what you should look for & avoid when searching for a superior whey protein powder. Discover which
one proves to be the purest & most powerful, consistently standing above the rest in quality & taste.
Look for Cold-Processed, Not Cold-Filtered
Once protein has been subjected to any amount of heat for any
period of time, it becomes denatured, or damaged. Denaturing
destroys the proteins’ effectiveness at supporting the immune
system and significantly weakens all body-building properties.
Don’t be fooled by the term “cold-filtered.” Cold-filtering is
NOT the same as cold-processing. Some brands rapidly cool
down the liquid whey after pasteurization to diminish the
amount of damage or denaturing done to the proteins. They call
this step "cold-filtering.” Cold-filtered protein powders have
still been significantly damaged. Until recently it was
impossible to find a whey protein powder that had not been
subjected to heat at some point during processing.
One World Whey™ Protein Powder is the first, 100%
UNHEATED, cold-temperature processed, completely all-
natural, unrefined, and grass-pasture raised milk-whey protein
powder. Regardless of the claims, no other protein powder
on the market is truly unheated from start to finish. One
World Whey™ is produced using the patented TruCool™
process, which is the world’s first all-natural, cold-formulation
process for maximum nutrient retention. This unique
microbial-safe process produces the highest level of naturally
occurring, cell-regenerating, lean muscle-developing and
immune system-enhancing, bioactive whey protein.
This is not the same old heat-refined whey protein that
virtually all other protein powder manufacturers sell to
unsuspecting consumers. Unlike other ordinary protein
supplements taken to meet daily nutritional needs or build
muscle, One World Whey™ is a full-spectrum, all-natural,
nutritional POWER FOOD providing overall life-enhancing
benefits.
Pure, Natural, Raw Whey from Grass Pasture Milk
The superior whey in One World Whey™ is obtained from the
milk of cows on Amish farms, where they graze on chemical-
free grass. No pesticides or herbicides are ever used. The
cows are humanely treated. No hormones, steroids, or
antibiotics are ever administered. From this pure milk, raw
whey protein is obtained to create an unrivaled protein
supplement.
One World Whey™ provides an amazing 25 grams of
superior protein in every serving. It is produced using only
the purest, most natural ingredients. No artificial ingredients
are ever used. Unheated stevia is used as a natural sweetener to
create an unbelievable taste without a single gram of sugar.
High Cysteine Levels Boosts Master Antioxidant
One World Whey™ makes it possible for your body to
significantly increase its production of glutathione. This protein
powder’s superior whey contains high levels of the amino
acid cysteine. Cysteine is the rate limiting amino acid that is
needed to create glutathione. Cysteine combines with richly
available amino acids, glycine and glutamate inside the body’s
cells to produce glutathione. Glutathione is considered to be
the body's master antioxidant. It is essential to the immune
system and liver for the detoxification of heavy metals and
other toxins. Glutathione actually binds to heavy metals inside
cells and elsewhere and then carries them out of the body.
Amazing Health Benefits of One World Whey™
 Detoxifies Heavy Metals & Toxins
 Boosts Master Antioxidant Levels
 Anti-Aging Properties
 Sharpens Brain Function
 Reduces Body Fat
 Increases Lean Muscle
 Boosts Energy Levels
 Enhances Athletic Abilities
 Speeds Exercise Recovery
 Supports Optimal Blood Sugar Levels
“It Actually Made Me Feel Better.
It’s By Far the Best I've Ever Tried!”
“During the past 30 years, I've tried a half-dozen or so whey
protein products. One World Whey™ is the first one in which I
noticed a discernible difference. It not only tastes better than
any other vanilla whey I've used, but it actually made me feel
better. This difference became even more dramatic when I ran
out and had to substitute another popular whey protein
product. Most people know how beneficial whey protein
powder is. More people need to know is how much more
beneficial One World Whey™ is. It’s by far the best I've ever
tried. I will never let myself run out of it again.” -Rich Maender
You Won’t Find One World Whey™ Just Anywhere
One World Whey™ Protein Powder is available through
Synergistic Nutrition in one and five pound containers. Choose
from three delicious, all-natural flavors: vanilla, strawberry, or
chocolate. Even children love the taste! Call 1(864)895-6250
or go to www.sgn80.com to receive a Limited-Time Offer
Discount on One World Whey™ Protein Powder.

14. INFOWARS.COM
“
“
G
un control advocate Sarah Brady’s infa-
mous vow to “get rid of all the guns”
has never been more prescient, as we
enter a second term of the Obama
administration – 18 months after
Obama assured Brady during a White
House meeting that gun control was
“very much on his agenda.”
Gun sales surged before the election, and panic
buying continues to proliferate, with stocks of gun
manufacturers like Ruger and Smith & Wesson going
parabolic, as Americans prepare for an all out assault
on the Second Amendment.
Obama himself publicly signaled his intention to
reintroduce the assault weapons ban during the
second presidential debate.
“What I’m trying to do is to get a broader conver-
sation about how do we reduce the violence general-
ly,” Obama said during the debate at Hofstra Univer-
sity. “Part of it is seeing if we can get an assault
weapons ban reintroduced.”
Obama’s anti-gun record clearly suggests he will
use his lame duck term as a tool with which to evis-
cerate the Second Amendment.
As an Illinois state senator, Obama attempted to limit
sales of handguns to one per month and even voted
against a bill that protected firearms manufacturers
from lawsuits over misuse of their products by others.
Obama has consistently supported the assault weapons
ban and even ridiculed gun owners during an April 2008
speech when he said small town people “cling to guns”
to express their frustration.
Obama’s March 2011 meeting with Brady, during
which he assured her that he was working “under the
radar” to assault gun rights just months before the Fast
and Furious scandal broke clearly indicates that Ameri-
cans may “cling to guns” for a very salient reason – the
SECOND AMENDMENT IN THE CROSSHAIRS
fear that an Obama administration with nothing to lose
is set to take a huge bite out of the Second Amendment.
Gun rights are already being whittled away through
regulatory procedures that operate outside of the law,
with the ATF last year issuing a letter ordering firearms
dealers in border states to report sales of two or more
semi-automatic rifles, and following it up by harassing
gun owners with intimidating home visits as well as
threatening gun dealers to spy on their customers.
The ATF’s regulatory backdoor assault on gun rights
is also opening the door for shotguns to be banned
under the justification that they can hold more than
two rounds, a move Dudley Brown, executive director
of Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, said “will be the most
dangerous interpretation of the 1968 Gun Control Act
ever envisioned and will outlaw thousands of perfectly
legitimate home defense shotguns.”
Americans who buy a few boxes of ammunition are
also being treated as suspicious individuals and ques-
tioned by police.
Senator Dianne Feinstein D-CA has already
resolved to push a new piece of anti-gun legisla-
tion that would, “Ban pistol grips and high-capacity
magazines, eliminate any grandfathering and ban
sales of weapons in possession.”
The fact that Barack Obama has occasionally prom-
ised not to target the Second Amendment is completely
meaningless. Indeed, if you look at all the other liberties
his administration has savaged, the assurance that he
won’t dismantle gun rights should almost be taken as a
threat that he will.
• As part of his 2008 campaign pledge, Obama
promised to close down Guantanamo Bay. The Obama
administration not only failed to close the infamous
prison camp, they expanded its use.
• Last year (after campaigning to protect Habeas
Corpus before he was elected), Obama promised not
Whatwe needto do is changethewayinwhich
peoplethink aboutguns, especiallyyoung
people….We haveto be repetitive aboutthis….
We needto dothis everydayoftheweek, and just
reallybrainwash people intothinking about
guns in avastlydifferentway.”
The mostfoolish
mistakewe could
possiblymakewould
beto allowthe
subjected peopleto
carryarms. History
showsthatall
conquerorswho
have allowedtheir
subjected peoples
to carryarms have
preparedtheir own
downfall byso
doing.”
attorney general Eric Holder
edict of march 18, 1938
Adolph Hitler
14

15. PRISONPLANET.COM
“
to sign the National Defense Authorization Act, with
its provisions for the indefinite detention of American
citizens, yet put his signature on the bill in the dead
of night on New Year’s Eve. Indeed, it was the Obama
administration itself that argued for the removal of
language that would have protected Americans from the
provisions and then had them reinstituted after a court
had struck them down.
• AS PARTOF HIS CAMPAIGN
PITCH, OBAMA PROMISED
TO “NOTUSE SIGNING
STATEMENTS AS AWAYOF
DOING AN END RUN AROUND
CONGRESS.” OBAMA HAS
ISSUED NO LESSTHAN 19
SIGNING STATEMENTS SINCE
HETOOK OFFICE.
• In 2008, Obama promised “no more illegal wiretap-
ping of American citizens.” Just months after he took
office, Obama expanded Bush’s warrantless wiretap-
ping program. The invasiveness of illegal wiretapping is
worse under Obama than it was under Bush.
THE HISTORY OF GUN
CONTROL IS THE
HISTORY OF TYRANNY
The history of gun control tells us that state seizure
of firearms is habitually used as a precursor to impose a
power monopoly of the state.
Right back to Roman times, the lower orders were
disarmed of all their weapons in a bid to suffocate
the political power of the people and limit their
ability to voice grievances.
Japanese warrior Toyotomi Hideyoshi was candid
in explaining why the population of that country
was disarmed in what came to be known as the
Great Sword Hunt in 1588 when he decreed: “The
possession of unnecessary implements [of war]
makes difficult the collection of taxes and dues,
and tends to foment uprisings.”
Communist mastermind Chairman Mao echoed a
similar sentiment when he stated, “Political power
grows out of the barrel of a gun.”
Fast forward 250 years, and some of the first gun
control laws in the embryonic United States were
against black people, to ensure they remained slaves.
Blacks were prohibited “to keep or carry any firelock of
any kind, any military weapon, or any powder or lead.”
Adolf Hitler was also abundantly aware of the fact
that the one thing standing in the way of a repres-
sive dictatorship is an armed population. In 1938 the
Nazis banned Jews “from acquiring, possessing, and
carrying firearms and ammunition, as well as trun-
cheons or stabbing weapons.”
In the 21st century, the primary vanguard of gun
control has been elevated to the international level.
Hours after Obama’s re-election victory, his adminis-
tration joined with 150 other governments to renew
support for the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty, a
process that critics have warned will set the stage for
Americans to have their gun rights voted out of exis-
tence by the global body with no involvement from the
U.S. Congress or Senate.
Whether Obama chooses to characterize his second
term by declaring war on the Second Amendment
remains to be seen, but it’s almost inevitable given that
virtually every one of Obama’s promises before his 2008
election success has been broken, we will once again
witness the lurching advance of big government over
the next four years as cherished rights are chewed up
and spat out with wanton disregard for the Constitu-
tional foundation of the country.
We mustget
rid of allthe
guns.” sarah Brady
15

20. 20
WHY OBAMA WILL REVIVE THE PUSH FOR
CO2 TAXES, AND THE “GREEN” AGENDA
IS ABOUT CONTROL AND PROFITS, NOT
SAVING THE ENVIRONMENT
B
arack Obama’s campaign for the presidency
leading up to the 2008 vote centered, in part,
around his image as an environmentalist
who would bring “green” energy solutions to
America. The 2012 campaign, on the other hand, was
far more reserved in advertising these policies.
Fierce battles in Congress over cap and trade, the
science of global warming and those who stand to profit
from carbon tax schemes drove the agenda underground
midway through Obama’s first term, but that doesn’t
mean it has gone away.
Obama now stands poised to rule by regulations, to
tax and control by a thousand cuts.
Indeed, the day after Obama was re-elected, mega-
banks announced that the administration was
considering reintroducing a carbon tax, promising the
environmental scheme could provide revenue that could
help pay down the U.S. deficit. Never mind that the tax
is really about control, and the money would be mostly
funneled through banks profiting off the scheme.
But that’s only the frontal assault, a push for legislation
that may or may not be achievable with a divided
Congress.
Instead, Barack Obama is continuing a tradition that
began with FDR, who demanded “broad executive
power,” and progressed into the dictatorial actions taken
by George W. Bush, who as president used executive
orders and the stroke of the pen to implement policy
and rule by fiat.
Back in 2008, presidential candidate and Senator
written by AARON DYKES

21. Barack Obama promised to bring the industry to its
knees through emissions regulations. “If somebody
wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can, it’s
just that it will bankrupt them,” Obama told the San
Francisco Chronicle. “Under my plan of a cap and trade
system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket,”
he also stated.
Obama and his appointee Lisa Jackson have used
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to do just
that, first officially declaring CO2 to be a dangerous
pollutant, then using red tape to crack down on energy
production, namely coal.
Days before the election, the Washington Examiner
revealed that the EPA had more than 50 staffers working
to finalize strict new regulations on greenhouse gases it
would implement during the lame duck session in the
event that Obama was not re-elected. Those new rules
would effectively prevent new coal power plants from
being built. Estimates show these new regulations alone
would cost the U.S. economy some $700 billion.
But Larry Bell, writing for Forbes.com, exposed the
fact that this was just the beginning. The full agenda
under Obama’s second term, just in energy regulations
alone, involves countless new proposals through the
EPA, under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Clean Water
Act (CWA) and other provisions, to regulate greenhouse
gas regulations, ozone standards, bodies of water big
and small across the United States, hydraulic fracking,
storm-water run-off requirements, the sulphur content
in gasoline, cement used for construction, cooling
towers, coal ash, spill prevention rules, farm dust
regulations and much more.
While some of these issues are legitimate concerns,
the overall scope of the regulatory assault amounts to
one net effect: higher costs for energy, for construction
materials and for the cost of achieving bureaucratic
approval and paperwork, which will in turn hamper
businesses and slow the economy even more. Obama’s
mean, green agenda will kill anywhere from half a
million to 1.4 million jobs just by 2014, according to
estimates conducted by the American Council for Capital
Formation. Senator James Inhofe (R-OK), a staunch
critic of the entire carbon agenda, published a report in
the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public
Works Minority Committee titled, “A Look Ahead to
EPA Regulations for 2013: Numerous Obama EPA Rules
Place on Hold Until After the Election Spell Doom for
Jobs and Economic Growth.” All this, and the EPA is
just one agency at Obama’s disposal. CNS News found
that the Obama administration is rapidly deploying
regulations, averaging 68 new requirements per day,
with at least 6,125 new proposals for taxation and red
tape underway. Through endless regulations, President
Obama intends to circumvent the stopgap measure of
Congress and rule as Bush did, by executive decree,
using agencies, as FDR did, to impose policy across the
land. But why would Obama pursue such devastating
policies just when America is trying to recover from the
greatest economic down turn of our time, which he has
presided over under sustained criticism?
Because the bankers are running the show, and
Obama, like Mitt Romney, is beholden to those banking
interests. In the most basic economics, supply and
demand are interrelated. Greater supply weakens
demand, creating abundance and cheap goods. On the
other hand, a weaker supply creates greater demand
and creates more expensive goods.
The burden of regulations, when applied to energy
costs, for instance, creates not only a more expensive
product, but an artificial scarcity on supply. Under
“green” (for money, not the environment) policies,
Americans will pay more for less electricity. Likewise,
under carbon taxes, where companies and individuals
trade for the right to pollute and bid up the price, an
artificial supply on carbon credits is also created, driving
up the price on something that didn’t even have a cost
prior to the regulation. And who does this benefit, but
the money changers? The bankers, the carbon traders
and the promoters of those systems stand to make
fortunes. Former Vice President Al Gore, among others,
was slated to become a “carbon billionaire” under cap-
and-trade schemes he had devised with a partner and
executive from Goldman Sachs. The concept of pricing
carbon itself evolved out of President Clinton’s Council
on Sustainable Development, formed in 1993, where Al
Gore sat with the heads of numerous energy companies,
including Enron’s CEO Ken Lay, to finalize a profitable
approach to environmentalism.
Years later, Enron became notorious with scandal and
fraud, but not before it made a killing in the deregulated
energy market of California. The documentary Enron:
Smartest Guys in the Room clearly demonstrates with
real audio recordings how traders from Enron and other
firms colluded with energy insiders to artificially shut
down power plants, creating energy shortages and
blackouts, so that they could drive up the price and rake
in the profits. It emerged in November 2012 that Barclays
was doing something quite similar, facing some $470
million in fines for rigging the U.S. electricity market.
Its employees had been caught bragging about their
manipulations in email, setting an investigation under
way. Obama’s latest round of carbon taxes was proposed
by HSBC Holdings Plc. who are currently facing record
fines of $1.5 billion for admitted money laundering
ESTIMATES SHOW THESE
NEW REGULATIONS ALONE
WOULD COST THE UNITED
STATES ECONOMY SOME
$700 BILLION.
activity - aiding Mexican drug cartels, terrorists group
and rogue nations with their finances.
The very mega-banks Americans bailed out in 2008
under duress include many of the same firms that stand
to make huge profits under carbon taxes and the trade
of their derivatives on the market, as well as other
lucrative (and controlling) regulations that may be
imposed on the U.S. economy. Yet the crisis itself was
created in large part by the horror of these banks betting
on the global derivatives market with the savings,
pensions and investments of ordinary, hard-working
Americans.
These examples of the crony capitalist market are
creating, and feeding, the larger problem that President
Obama’s new regulations will only exacerbate. The
crony market is the very opposite of anything even
resembling a free market. Worse than just inefficient, it
breeds corruption. Solyndra is iconic of that – picking
winners and losers, and subsidizing insiders with no
meaningful return to the taxpayers who funded it.
But it is far worse than just Solyndra. The scope of
involvement of the globalist offshore entities that control
the big banks means that the system is gamed from
the beginning. Regulations amount to a virtual racket
when you factor in the insider trading of information
about the atmosphere of the market. Friends of the
administration and of the banks get waivers, know the
timing and otherwise have telling advice about how
to place their bets. Meanwhile, honest businesses are
saddled with loads of paperwork, new taxes and the
constant threat of regulatory intervention. For already
dominant financial institutions, eliminating competition
is an easy task.
The public is sold on the merit of backing “green”
environmental initiatives, thinking they’ve joined a
beneficial program to help save the earth, conserve
resources and stick it to the polluters. But the truth is
they have been deceived. Whether it is the Rockefeller
Brothers Fund and their original Standard Oil interests,
Dutch Royal Shell, Goldman Sachs, General Electric, or
many other big players, it is too often the big polluters
who are actually driving the regulatory regime,
partnered with big banks to profit from the control of
our human activities.
Whatever the concerns we may have about our
environment, we are unintentionally enabling our
economic domination and the demise of the global
economy through dangerous regulations like the ones
Obama is now beginning to implement as his second
term unfolds.
Aaron Dykes is a researcher, reporter, producer and
writer for the Nightly News and www.infowars.com. He
graduated from the University of Texas and has been
working with Alex Jones since 2006.
21

23. N O W D E P A R T I N G
DANGER! TRAVEL ADVISORY!
BEWARE OF TSA CRIMEZONES
Y O U R L U G G A G E
29
27
24 17
15
14
14
11
6
12
6
6
5
10
10
12
7
7
9
# OF FIRED TSA EMPLOYEES
253 Total
TOP 2 0 MA J OR A I RPORT S
PRISONPLANET.COM 23

24. A M E R I C A N S
D I G N I T Y O RF
P O L I C E S T A T E
T
he new survey commissioned by Infowars
and conducted by Harris Interactive has also
found that almost one third of American
adults would accept a “TSA body cavity
search” in order to fly, with a majority of Americans
also feeling a law that would make disobeying a TSA
agent in any public place illegal is reasonable.
The shocking results emphasize the level of indignity
Americans are willing to tolerate in order to travel. They
also highlight how the TSA’s reputation has remained
largely intact despite a series of scandals and widespread
criticism from innumerable public figures.
However, on other fronts the poll provides good news
for those concerned with how liberties are being lost
in the name of stopping terrorism. For example, a clear
majority (65 percent) of American adults feel that TSA
pat down policies that in some cases involve TSA agents
touching travelers’ genitals are unacceptable.
The survey was conducted online by Harris Interactive
on behalf of Infowars from November 5 to 7 among
2,059 American adults.
American adults were asked the following question as
part of the poll:
Given the recent reports concerning the
threat posed by terrorists who plan to implant
bombs within their own bodies, how willing,
if at all, would you be to undergo a TSA body
cavity search in order to fly?
A total 30 percent of American adults said they
would be “willing” or “somewhat willing” to accept a
body cavity search; 57 percent would be “completely”
or “somewhat unwilling” to submit to it and 13
percent answered “don’t know.”
Although the exact definition was not explained in the
question, given that the term “body cavity search” refers
to the most intrusive search imaginable, one normally
performed on dangerous felons before they go to prison,
the fact that almost one third of American adults would
submit to such an invasion of their privacy simply to get
on a plane is astounding.
Given the rash of stories about TSA agents touching
travelers’ genitals as part of pat down procedures for
those who “opt out” of body scanners, the poll posed the
following question:
In some cases, the TSA’s more invasive pat
down procedures now include agents touching
travelers’ genital area through their clothing.
How acceptable, if at all, do you feel this is,
considering the potential major threat posed
by terrorists?
Despite the fact that this policy is already underway
in some instances, a full 65 percent of American adults
found TSA workers touching genitals “completely”
or “somewhat unacceptable.” A further 35 percent of
American adults found this “completely” or “somewhat
acceptable”. More Republicans than Democrats (12
percent to 9 percent) were likely to find this “completely
acceptable.”
Those concerned with how much power has been
concentrated into the hands of TSA workers, who are
after all federal employees and not police officers,
would also be disturbed at the response to the following
question:
How reasonable or unreasonable do you feel
it is that travelers should be made by law to
obey every command given by a TSA agent
inside an airport or any other public place
given the threat posed by terrorists?
A total 57 percent of American adults said this was
“completely” or “somewhat reasonable.” A minority
of 43 percent said passing a law that would mandate
total obedience to a TSA agent was “completely” or
“somewhat unreasonable.” Further, only 16 percent of
people thought it was “completely unreasonable.”
Surprisingly, given their traditional distrust of big
government, 60 percent of Republicans thought it
reasonable compared to 64 percent of Democrats and 46
percent of Independents.
Asked how the TSA is performing in its screening
duties at U.S. Airports, 77 percent of American adults
said the federal agency was doing an excellent, good
or fair job. Only 23 percent of American adults thought
the TSA was doing a not very good job or a bad job in
its duties. Despite sustained negative media coverage of
the agency’s activities, of that latter netcategory, only 9
percent in total thought the TSA was doing a “bad job.”
Nearly One Third Of
Americans Would
Accept ‘TSA Body
Cavity Search’ in
Order to Fly
written by Paul Joseph Watson
INFOWARS.COM24

25. S U R R E N D E R
R S E C U R I T Y
N O W A R I V I N GR
More Democrats than Republicans (84 percent to
73 percent) responded that they thought the TSA was
doing an excellent, good or fair job.
The idea of mandating travelers wear an electric
shock bracelet sounds like something out of a dystopian
sci-fi movie, but the proposal was seriously considered
and very nearly implemented by the Department of
Homeland Security back in 2008.
According to a video put out by Avion Communications
Group, not only would the bracelets have been used
to deliver incapacitating electric shocks to suspected
terrorists, they would also have contained tracking
technology to spy on the wearer.
In reference to this, the survey asked the following
question:
In 2008, the Department of Homeland
Security expressed an interest in having
travelers wear electric shock bracelets that
would both track travelers through the airport
as well as allow airport officials and flight
crews to incapacitate potential terrorists.
How willing, if at all, would you be to wear such
a bracelet in order to fly?
An astounding 35 percent of American adults responded
that they would be “completely” or “somewhat willing”
to wear the shock bracelet. Republicans were more likely
to be willing than Democrats, 41 percent to 34 percent.
Only a slim majority of 52 percent said they would
be “completely” unwilling or “somewhat unwilling”
to wear the shock bracelet. The rest (13 percent)
responded “don’t know.”
The fact that a sizable portion of American adults are
willing to wear a device that would allow a TSA agent
or other airline official to arbitrarily deliver a paralyzing
electric shock similar to a taser gun is a shocking
indication of how much freedom and dignity Americans
are happy to give up in the name of security.
Given how close the DHS came to actually
implementing the plan, one wonders if it is likely to
rear its head once more.
In 2008, the Washington Times reported on how DHS
official Paul S. Ruwaldt of the Science and Technology
Directorate, office of Research and Development,
wrote to Lamperd Less Lethal, Inc. indicating that
the Department of Homeland Security was ready to
purchase devices from the company that would be used
to deliver incapacitating shocks to airline passengers, all
of whom would be mandated to wear the shock bracelet
once they checked in for their flight.
In his letter, Ruwaldt also noted how the bracelet
could be used as a “method of interrogation,” in other
words a torture device. He also raised the prospect of
using the device against protesters to allow the
temporary “restraint of large numbers of individuals in
open area environments by a small number of agents or
Law Enforcement Officers.”
The letter stated that the DHS was “interested
in…. the immobilizing security bracelet” and that
it was “conceivable to envision a use to improve air
security, on passenger planes.” Other letters made it
clear that the DOD, the CDC, Department of Interior,
Department of Agriculture Forestry service as well as
unnamed law enforcement agencies were also keen
on acquiring the device.
Following a wave of negative publicity, the DHS
pulled the plug on its interest in the electric shock
bracelet, and Lamperd Less Lethal, Inc. set about
removing the letters from Ruwaldt it had previously
proudly displayed on its website.
The results of this poll again underscore
how ignorant many Americans remain of their
rights at airports and other transport hubs
where TSA agents are present. The results also
clearly indicate that a substantial portion of
Americans, around one in three, are willing to
toleratevirtuallyanyindignityifitisperformed
in the name of safety and security.
To view the results of the survey in full please visit:
h t t p : / / s t a t i c . p r i s o n p l a n e t . c o m / p / i m a g e s /
november2012/poll.doc
Abbreviated Methodology
This survey was conducted online within the United
States by Harris Interactive on behalf of Free Speech
Systems from November 5-7 among 2,059 adults ages 18
and older. This online survey is not based on a probability
sample and therefore no estimate of theoretical sampling
error can be calculated. For complete survey methodology,
including weighting variables, please contact watson-
paul3@sky.com.
Paul Joseph Watson is editor and writer for the infowars
site www.prisonplanet.com. He is the author of “Order
Out of Chaos.” Watson is also a regular fill-in host for the
Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.
A PARTICULARLY
SHOCKING DISCOVERY
PRISONPLANET.COM 25

26. F
or years, the system denied that blood samples
from newborns were being taken at birth and
databased into DNA ‘warehouses.’ Alex Jones and
other alternative researchers railed against it for
more than a decade. Now, that period of denial is over,
and the same system is instead declaring its right to do so.
Bioethicists in the Science Translational Medicine
journal argued that researchers should be able to retain
and peruse the “genetic treasure trove” of blood samples
taken during routine screenings at hospitals after birth,
despite long-standing objections over privacy, parental
rights and disclosure.
In fact, governments across the Western world —
and almost every state in the United States — have
been collecting, retaining, researching and cataloguing
genetic material of babies without any statutory authori-
ty to do so, and without parental knowledge for decades.
Long legal battles in states including Minnesota and
Texas have resulted in decisions requiring informed
consent over these practices, given the existence of
genetic privacy laws, and yet health departments and
other related entities have petitioned for exemptions
from these requirements. In essence, the state has, in
many cases, declared ownership over your DNA, keeping
genetic material indefinitely. However, in Minnesota
and Texas, authorities have been ordered to destroy
millions of samples to comply with privacy laws.
Twila Brase, president of the Citizens’ Council on
Health Care, worked on many of these cases, and breaks
down the issue in the following video:
“The DNA taken at birth from every citizen is essen-
tially owned by the government, and every citizen
becomes a potential subject of government-sponsored
genetic research,” Brase states. “It does not require
consent and there are no requirements to inform
parents about the warehousing of their child’s DNA for
the purpose of genetic research.
A 2008 law signed by President George W. Bush
appears to give legitimacy to storing and researching
newborn genetic material, despite legal challenges and
outcry from people like Congressman Ron Paul, who say
the law is unconstitutional.
Now, bioethicists Michelle Huckaby Lewis, Michael E.
Scheurer, Robert C. Green and Amy L. McGuire have
written a white paper to argue for the legitimacy of
preserving these DNA samples for research, in spite of
parental objections and clear civil rights issues.
The abstract for their policy paper, Research Results:
Preserving Newborn Blood Samples, summarizes the issue:
Retention and use, without explicit parental permis-
sion, of residual dried blood samples from newborn
screening has generated
public controversy over
concerns about viola-
tions of family privacy
rights and loss of paren-
tal autonomy. The public
debate about this issue
has included little discus-
sion about the destruction
of a potentially valuable
public resource that can
be used for research
that may yield improve-
ments in public health.
The research community
must advocate for poli-
cies and infrastructure
that promote retention
of residual dried blood
samples and their use in
biomedical research.
These bioethicists
have complained that a
“narrow view of privacy
is hampering research,”
insisting instead that
“the research commu-
nity must advocate for
policies that support the
retention of these samples
and their use in biomed-
ical research,” as author
Michelle Lewis stated.
These DNA samples must be used to the “fullest extent
possible to improve the health of our citizenry,” accord-
ing to the authors.
The policy is squarely on the side of larger state
power, where the concerns of the individual are swept
aside in the name of the “greater good.” These authors
emphasize the potential for research in medical treat-
ments and other potentially life-saving solutions, and
yet the era has dawned where consumer-patients are
offered access to costly patented genetic interventions
where an individual’s God-given genetic material is
sold back to them for a price.
It is an emerging paradigm of total state control over
life, reproduction, screening for “designer babies” and
other related areas controlled by the system for the
benefit of insider crony corporate interests. And the
collectivist “bioethicists,” (who are really neo-eugeni-
cists), are arguing for so-called ethical tradeoffs in every
conceivable field — abortion, cloning, artificial insem-
ination, end of life care (a.k.a. death panels), animal
rights, transhumanism, euthanasia, eugenics, life exten-
sion, human experimentation and much more.
Their philosophy, to empower the technocratic state
and selectively advance preferred individuals under that
system, comes from the classical Eugenics era, where
leading voices like T. H. Huxley, president of the Royal
Society of Science and grandfather of author Aldous
Huxley and biologist/UNESCO founder Julian Huxley,
argued that under eugenics, it is “ethical” to replace
inferior individuals (and their reproductive rights) with
that of superior individuals. It is an elitist creed that has
passed down from the ages and continues today in the
hands of the globalist cabal steering the emerging world
government system.
Leading bioethicists have argued, in official white
papers mind you, that babies should be allowed to be
killed up to age 3, that health care rationing and death
panels are justifiable, that water supplies should be
laced with lithium and other mind-altering drugs to
socially control the population, and much more.
After years of denying that blood samples
were taken at birth, bioethicists are arguing
for the government’s right to seize newborns’
blood samples for global database.
SYSTEM ANNOUNCES
IT WILL USE DNA
STOLEN FROM
BABIES written by AARON DYKES
INFOWARS.COM

27. PRISONPLANET.COM

28. Last train out to get off the grid?
Amazing“SolarGenerator”Is
LikeHavingASecretPower
PlantHiddenInYourHome!
N
ew solar powered backup provides instant
electrical power in any outage or disaster.
If you have ever wanted to have an emergency
backup system that supplies continuous electrical power,
this will be the most important message you will ever read.
Here is why.
There is now a completely portable (and ultra-high
efficient) solar power generator which produces up to 1800
watts of household electricity on demand when you need it
most. News of this “solar backup generator” (it’s the first
“off-the-grid” breakthrough in 50 years) is spreading like
wild fire all across the country!
Why?
The answer is easy. You see, this solar generator is
extremely powerful and yet very simple to use. It produces
continuous electricity and runs with absolutely no noise
whatsoever. It emits no fumes. But the best part about the
solar generator is that once you own one, you can...
Generate Free Electricity From The Sun!
Charged by the sun with a powerful solar panel, the unit
then stores the power for your use when you need it. We
all face natural disasters, with hurricanes, tornadoes, snow
and ice storms cutting off electrical power to millions of
Americans each year.
Then there are man-made disasters and outages.
Blackouts and rolling brownouts are becoming common in
many parts of the United States as our grid gets stretched
beyond its capacity.
The truth is, we are extremely vulnerable to all kinds
of meltdowns that can create temporary or even permanent
electrical outages. That’s why if you are one of the few
Americans that thinks ahead, you need to…
Have A Solar Powered Backup In Place!
When you compare a solar generator to a gas generator,
the difference is pretty remarkable. Here’s why. First, gas
generators make an incredible amount of racket… if you
can even get them started in the first place. With a gas
generator, you pull and pull some more, all because your
generator has been sitting in the cold and the carburetor is
playing hard to get. This, of course, is not a lot of fun in
the dark. Another reason to avoid gas generators is that you
just can’t safely run one in your house. But the number one
reason you don’t want to be caught in a time of crisis with a
gas generator is…
Gas Stations Can’t Pump Gas
Without Electricity!
It’s true. When the power goes out, you’re left with
whatever gas you have on hand because the gas station
pumps all run on electricity. A few gallons stored in a gas
can means a little electricity for a little while, then it’s
quickly “back to black.”
Here’s the thing: I could go on and on about life without
electricity and what a nightmare gas generators can be.
But here’s the bottom line: Solutions From Science is now
offering an amazing power generating system that can
provide plenty of electrical power in the event of an outage
or emergency. And the best part is that you can have the
power safely in your house.
A True Breakthrough In
Home Power Generation!
Let me try to explain the features and benefits of a solar
generator as simply as possible. If I could bring one over
to your house and let you start plugging in appliances, you
would immediately understand what all the fuss is about.
But I can’t do that. Anyway, here are some of the reasons I
think you’ll want a solar generator:
#1. Maximum Power In Minimum Time.
The solar generator can be set up in just a few minutes.
Then, all you have to do is start plugging things in. It can run
both AC & DC appliances anywhere… anytime.
#2. Back Up Power When You Need It Most.
It’s called a “solar backup” because it’s designed to come
to your rescue when power trouble starts and your lights go
out. Run a small refrigerator (high efficient ones are best) to
keep your food from going bad.
#3. Portable Power.
If the going ever gets too tough where you are and you
decide to “get out of dodge,” you simply throw it in the car
and take off to a safer destination.
#4. Generates Permanent Power.
The unit provides 1800 watts of electricity at peak power.
That’s enough to run many appliances in your house. The
generator is recharged constantly by the sun allowing you
to use the system while charging it at the same time. Many
users choose to keep appliances plugged in permanently to
reduce electrical costs and help pay for the unit.
#5. Multiple Uses.
You can use your solar backup to run essential appliances
when emergencies arise. You can recharge phones,
run shortwave radios, televisions, lights, fire place or
furnace fans, as well as computers and printers. Plus,
if you need to work in the woods at the cabin or in a
boat, you can use the solar backup to run power tools,
trimmers, blowers and coffee makers.
#6. Plug And Play Means Instant Power.
The emergency backup system comes ready to
go. Just start plugging in your favorite household
essentials.
By the way... the units go for about $1697.00 plus
shipping and handling.
But I’m going to show you a way around that. I
have negotiated a very special offer for readers of
InfoWars magazine.
Here’s the deal. You can use coupon code IW201 to
get one for $200.00 off as a reader of InfoWars magazine.
To do that, the absolute fastest way to get one is by going
to the website at:
www.MySolarBackup.com
If you would like to order by phone, you can
call toll-free by dialing 877-327-0365. Tell whoever
answers that you want the “Solar Backup Generator”
system rushed to you and you have a coupon because
you are a reader of InfoWars magazine.
Or, if you prefer to pay by check or money order
(payable to Solutions From Science), simply send your
payment to:
Solutions From Science
Dept. Solar Backup IW201
815 W. Main St.
P.O. Box 518
Thomson, IL 61285
I’m so convinced every American household needs
a Solar Generator, that I’ve arranged for this special
deal to get one to you at this dirt cheap price. (When
you call, ask about their free shipping offer as well.)
Just hurry, call 877-327-0365
Sincerely,
Mike Walters
P.S. One more thing. It’s very important.
Make sure you use coupon code IW201 to get all the
discounts you have coming as a reader of InfoWars
magazine.
BY MIKE WALTERS
STAFF WRITER, OFF THE GRID NEWS

29. ThismaywellbethelasttimeIspeakontheHouseFloor. Atthe
endoftheyearI’llleaveCongressafter23yearsinofficeovera36
yearperiod. Mygoalsin1976werethesameastheyaretoday:
promotepeaceandprosperitybyastrictadherencetotheprinciples
ofindividualliberty.
Itwasmyopinion,thatthecoursetheU.S.embarkedoninthelatter
partofthe20thCenturywouldbringusamajorfinancialcrisisand
engulfusinaforeignpolicythatwouldoverextendusandundermine
ournationalsecurity.
ToachievethegoalsIsought,governmentwouldhavehadtoshrink
insizeandscope,reducespending,changethemonetarysystem,and
rejecttheunsustainablecostsofpolicingtheworldandexpanding
theAmericanEmpire.
Theproblemsseemedtobeoverwhelmingandimpossibletosolve,
yetfrommyviewpoint,justfollowingtheconstraintsplacedonthe
federalgovernmentbytheConstitutionwouldhavebeenagood
placetostart.
HowMuchDidIAccomplish?
Inmanyways,accordingtoconventionalwisdom,myoff-and-on
careerinCongress,from1976to2012,accomplishedverylittle.
Nonamedlegislation,nonamedfederalbuildingsorhighways—
thankgoodness. Inspiteofmyefforts,thegovernmenthasgrown
exponentially,taxesremainexcessive,andtheprolificincreaseof
incomprehensibleregulationscontinues. Warsareconstantand
pursuedwithoutCongressionaldeclaration,deficitsrisetothesky,
povertyisrampantanddependencyonthefederalgovernmentis
nowworsethananytimeinourhistory.
Allthiswithminimalconcernsforthedeficitsandunfunded
liabilitiesthatcommonsensetellsuscannotgoonmuchlonger. A
grand,butnevermentioned,bipartisanagreementallowsforthe
well-keptsecretthatkeepsthespendinggoing. Onesidedoesn’t
giveuponepennyonmilitaryspending,theothersidedoesn’tgive
uponepennyonwelfarespending,whilebothsidessupportthe
bailoutsandsubsidiesforthebankingand corporateelite. And
thespendingcontinuesastheeconomyweakensandthedownward
spiralcontinues. Asthegovernmentcontinuesfiddlingaround,our
libertiesandourwealthburnintheflamesofaforeignpolicythat
makesuslesssafe.
ThemajorstumblingblocktorealchangeinWashingtonisthetotal
resistancetoadmittingthatthecountryisbroke.Thishasmade
compromising,justtoagreetoincreasespending,inevitablesince
neithersidehasanyintentionofcuttingspending.
ThecountryandtheCongresswillremaindivisivesincethere’sno
“lootlefttodivvyup.”
WithoutthisrecognitionthespendersinWashingtonwillcontinue
themarchtowardafiscalcliffmuchbiggerthantheoneanticipated
thiscomingJanuary.
Ihavethoughtalotaboutwhythoseofuswhobelieveinliberty,asa
solution,havedonesopoorlyinconvincingothersofitsbenefits. If
monetarysystem,itwasdoomedtofail. Wehaveendedupwith
asystemthatdoesn’tproduceenougheventofinancethedebtand
nofundamentalunderstandingofwhyafreesocietyiscrucialto
reversingthesetrends.
Ifthisisnotrecognized,therecoverywilllingerforalongtime.
Biggergovernment,morespending,moredebt,morepovertyfor
themiddleclass,andamoreintensescramblebytheelitespecial
interestswillcontinue.
WeNeedanIntellectualAwakening
Withoutanintellectualawakening,theturningpointwillbedriven
byeconomiclaw. Adollarcrisiswillbringthecurrentout-of-control
systemtoitsknees.
Ifit’snotacceptedthatbiggovernment,fiatmoney,ignoringliberty,
centraleconomicplanning,welfarism,andwarfarismcausedour
crisiswecanexpectacontinuousanddangerousmarchtoward
corporatismandevenfascismwithevenmorelossofourliberties.
Prosperityforalargemiddleclassthoughwillbecomeanabstract
dream.
Thiscontinuousmoveisnodifferentthanwhatwehaveseeninhow
ourfinancialcrisisof2008washandled. Congressfirstdirected,
withbipartisansupport,bailoutsforthewealthy. Thenitwasthe
FederalReservewithitsendlessquantitativeeasing.Ifatfirstit
doesn’tsucceedtryagain;QE1,QE2,andQE3andwithnoresults
wetryQEindefinitely—thatisuntilittoofails. There’sacosttoall
ofthisandletmeassureyoudelayingthepaymentisnolongeran
option. Therulesofthemarketwillextractitspoundoffleshandit
won’tbepretty.
Thecurrentcrisiselicitsalotofpessimism. Andthepessimismadds
tolessconfidenceinthefuture. Thetwofeedonthemselves,making
oursituationworse.
Iftheunderlyingcauseofthecrisisisnotunderstoodwecannotsolve
ourproblems.Theissuesofwarfare,welfare,deficits,inflationism,
corporatism,bailoutsandauthoritarianismcannotbeignored. By
onlyexpandingthesepolicieswecannotexpectgoodresults.
Everyoneclaimssupportforfreedom. Buttoooftenit’sforone’s
ownfreedomandnotforothers. Toomanybelievethattheremust
belimitsonfreedom.Theyarguethatfreedommustbedirectedand
managedtoachievefairnessandequalitythusmakingitacceptable
tocurtail,throughforce,certainliberties.
Somedecidewhatandwhosefreedomsaretobelimited. Theseare
thepoliticianswhosegoalinlifeispower.Theirsuccessdependson
gainingsupportfromspecialinterests.
NoMore‘isms’
Thegreatnewsistheanswerisnottobefoundinmore“isms.” The
answersaretobefoundinmorelibertywhichcostsomuchless.
Underthesecircumstancesspendinggoesdown,wealthproduction
goesup,andthequalityoflifeimproves.
Justthisrecognition—especiallyifwemoveinthisdirection—
increasesoptimismwhichinitselfisbeneficial. Thefollowthrough
asmandatedbytheConstitution?
WhyisGermanyconcernedenoughtoconsiderrepatriatingtheir
goldheldbytheFEDforherinNewYork? Isitthatthetrustinthe
U.S.anddollarsupremacybeginningtowane?
Whydoourpoliticalleadersbelieveit’sunnecessarytothoroughly
auditourowngold?
Whycan’tAmericansdecidewhichtypeoflightbulbstheycanbuy?
WhyistheTSApermittedtoabusetherightsofanyAmerican
travelingbyair?
Whyshouldtherebemandatorysentences—evenuptolifeforcrimes
withoutvictims—asourdruglawsrequire?
Whyhaveweallowedthefederalgovernmenttoregulatecommodes
inourhomes?
WhyisitpoliticalsuicideforanyonetocriticizeAIPAC?
Whyhaven’twegivenuponthedrugwarsinceit’sanobvious
failureandviolatesthepeople’srights?Hasnobodynoticedthat
theauthoritiescan’tevenkeepdrugsoutoftheprisons?Howcan
makingourentiresocietyaprisonsolvetheproblem?
Whydowesacrificesomuchgettingneedlesslyinvolvedinborder
disputesandcivilstrifearoundtheworldandignoretherootcause
ofthemostdeadlyborderintheworld-theonebetweenMexicoand
theUS?
WhydoesCongresswillinglygiveupitsprerogativestotheExecutive
Branch?
Whydoeschangingthepartyinpowerneverchangepolicy?Couldit
bethattheviewsofbothpartiesareessentiallythesame?
Whydidthebigbanks,thelargecorporations,andforeignbanksand
foreigncentralbanksgetbailedoutin2008andthemiddleclasslost
theirjobsandtheirhomes?
Whydosomanyinthegovernmentandthefederalofficialsbelieve
thatcreatingmoneyoutofthinaircreateswealth?
Whydosomanyacceptthedeeplyflawedprinciplethatgovernment
bureaucratsandpoliticianscanprotectusfromourselveswithout
totallydestroyingtheprincipleofliberty?
Whycan’tpeopleunderstandthatwaralwaysdestroyswealthand
liberty?
WhyistheresolittleconcernfortheExecutiveOrderthatgives
thePresidentauthoritytoestablisha“killlist,”includingAmerican
citizens,ofthosetargetedforassassination?
Whyispatriotismthoughttobeblindloyaltytothegovernmentand
thepoliticianswhorunit,ratherthanloyaltytotheprinciplesof
libertyandsupportforthepeople?Realpatriotismisawillingnessto
challengethegovernmentwhenit’swrong.
Whyisitisclaimedthatifpeoplewon’t orcan’ttakecareoftheir
ownneeds,thatpeopleingovernmentcandoitforthem?
Whydidweevergivethegovernmentasafehavenforinitiating
violenceagainstthepeople?
Whydosomemembersdefendfreemarkets,butnotcivilliberties?
Whydosomemembersdefendcivillibertiesbutnotfreemarkets?
CONTINUEDONPG.32CONTINUEDONPG.32CONTINUEDONPG.32

32. libertyiswhatweclaimitis-theprinciplethatprotectsallpersonal,
socialandeconomicdecisionsnecessaryformaximumprosperity
andthebestchanceforpeace-itshouldbeaneasysell. Yet,history
hasshownthatthemasseshavebeenquitereceptivetothepromises
ofauthoritarianswhicharerarelyifeverfulfilled.
Authoritarianismvs.Liberty
Ifauthoritarianismleadstopovertyandwarandlessfreedom
forallindividualsandiscontrolledbyrichspecialinterests,the
peopleshouldbebeggingforliberty. Therecertainlywasastrong
enoughsentimentformorefreedomatthetimeofourfoundingthat
motivatedthosewhowerewillingtofightintherevolutionagainst
thepowerfulBritishgovernment.
DuringmytimeinCongresstheappetiteforlibertyhasbeenquite
weak;theunderstandingofitssignificancenegligible. Yetthegood
newsisthatcomparedto1976whenIfirstcametoCongress,the
desireformorefreedomandlessgovernmentin2012ismuchgreater
andgrowing,especiallyingrassrootsAmerica.Tensofthousands
ofteenagersandcollegeagestudentsare,withgreatenthusiasm,
welcomingthemessageofliberty.
Ihaveafewthoughtsastowhythepeopleofacountrylikeours,
oncethefreestandmostprosperous,allowedtheconditionsto
deterioratetothedegreethattheyhave.
Freedom,privateproperty,andenforceablevoluntarycontracts,
generatewealth. Inourearlyhistorywewereverymuchaware
ofthis. Butintheearlypartofthe20thcenturyourpoliticians
promotedthenotionthatthetaxandmonetarysystemshadtochange
ifweweretoinvolveourselvesinexcessivedomesticandmilitary
spending.ThatiswhyCongressgaveustheFederalReserveand
theincometax. ThemajorityofAmericansandmanygovernment
officialsagreedthatsacrificingsomelibertywasnecessarytocarry
outwhatsomeclaimedtobe“progressive”ideas.Puredemocracy
becameacceptable.
Theyfailedtorecognizedthatwhattheyweredoingwasexactly
oppositeofwhatthecolonistswereseekingwhentheybrokeaway
fromtheBritish.
Somecomplainthatmyargumentsmakesnosense,sincegreat
wealthandthestandardoflivingimproved formanyAmericans
overthelast100years,evenwiththesenewpolicies.
Butthedamagetothemarketeconomy,andthecurrency,hasbeen
insidiousandsteady. Ittookalongtimetoconsumeourwealth,
destroythecurrencyandundermineproductivityandgetour
financialobligationstoapointofnoreturn.Confidencesometimes
lastslongerthandeserved.Mostofourwealthtodaydependson
debt.
Thewealththatweenjoyedandseemedtobeendless,allowed
concernfortheprincipleofafreesocietytobeneglected. Aslong
asmostpeoplebelievedthematerialabundancewouldlastforever,
worryingaboutprotectingacompetitiveproductiveeconomyand
individuallibertyseemedunnecessary.
TheAgeofRedistribution
Thisneglectusheredinanageofredistributionofwealthby
governmentkowtowingtoanyandallspecialinterests,exceptfor
thosewhojustwantedtoleftalone. Thatiswhytodaymoneyin
politicsfarsurpassesmoneycurrentlygoingintoresearchand
developmentandproductiveentrepreneurialefforts.
Thematerialbenefitsbecamemoreimportantthantheunderstanding
andpromotingtheprinciplesoflibertyandafreemarket. Itisgood
thatmaterialabundanceisaresultoflibertybutifmaterialismisall
thatwecareabout,problemsareguaranteed.
Thecrisisarrivedbecausetheillusionthatwealthandprosperity
wouldlastforeverhasended.Sinceitwasbasedondebtanda
pretensethatdebtcanbepaperedoverbyanout-of-controlfiat
withsoundpoliciesarerequiredwhichmustbeunderstoodand
supportedbythepeople.
Butthereisgoodevidencethatthegenerationcomingofageatthe
presenttimeissupportiveofmovinginthedirectionofmoreliberty
andself-reliance.Themorethischangeindirectionandthesolutions
becomeknown,thequickerwillbethereturnofoptimism.
Ourjob,forthoseofuswhobelievethatadifferentsystemthan
the onethatwehave hadforthe last100years,hasdrivenus
tothisunsustainablecrisis,istobemoreconvincingthatthereis
awonderful,uncomplicated,andmoralsystemthatprovidesthe
answers. Wehadatasteofitinourearlyhistory.Weneednotgive
uponthenotionofadvancingthiscause.
Itworked,butweallowedourleaderstoconcentrateonthematerial
abundancethatfreedomgenerates,whileignoringfreedomitself.
Nowwehaveneither,butthedoorisopen,outofnecessity,for
ananswer. TheansweravailableisbasedontheConstitution,
individuallibertyandprohibitingtheuseofgovernmentforceto
provideprivilegesandbenefitstoallspecialinterests.
Afterover100yearswefaceasocietyquitedifferentfromtheone
thatwasintendedbytheFounders. Inmanywaystheireffortsto
protectfuturegenerationswiththeConstitutionfromthisdangerhas
failed. Skeptics,atthetimetheConstitutionwaswrittenin1787,
warnedusoftoday’spossibleoutcome. Theinsidiousnatureofthe
erosionofourlibertiesandthereassuranceourgreatabundance
gaveus,allowedtheprocesstoevolveintothedangerousperiodin
whichwenowlive.
DependencyonGovernmentLargesse
Todaywefaceadependencyongovernmentlargesseforalmostevery
need. Ourlibertiesarerestrictedandgovernmentoperatesoutside
theruleoflaw,protectingandrewardingthosewhobuyorcoerce
governmentintosatisfyingtheirdemands.Hereareafewexamples:
Undeclaredwarsarecommonplace.
Welfarefortherichandpoorisconsideredanentitlement.
Theeconomyisoverregulated,overtaxedandgrosslydistortedbya
deeplyflawedmonetarysystem.
Debtisgrowingexponentially.
ThePatriotActandFISAlegislationpassedwithoutmuchdebate
haveresultedinasteadyerosionofour4thAmendmentrights.
Tragicallyourgovernmentengagesinpreemptivewar,otherwise
knownasaggression,withnocomplaintsfromtheAmericanpeople.
Thedronewarfarewearepursuingworldwideisdestinedtoend
badlyforusasthehatredbuildsforinnocentliveslostandthe
internationallawsflaunted.Oncewearefinanciallyweakenedand
militarilychallenged,therewillbealotresentmentthrownourway.
It’snowthelawofthelandthatthemilitarycanarrestAmerican
citizens,holdthemindefinitely,withoutchargesoratrial.
Rampanthostilitytowardfreetradeissupportedbyalargenumber
inWashington.
Supportersofsanctions,currencymanipulationandWTOtrade
retaliation,callthetruefreetraders“isolationists.”
Sanctionsareusedtopunishcountriesthatdon’tfollowourorders.
Bailoutsandguaranteesforallkindsofmisbehaviorareroutine.
Centraleconomicplanningthroughmonetarypolicy,regulationsand
legislativemandateshasbeenanacceptablepolicy.
Questions
Excessivegovernmenthascreatedsuchamessitpromptsmany
questions:
Whyaresickpeoplewhousemedicalmarijuanaputinprison?
Whydoesthefederalgovernmentrestrictthedrinkingofrawmilk?
Whycan’tAmericansmanufacturerropeandotherproductsfrom
hemp?
WhyareAmericansnotallowedtousegoldandsilveraslegaltender
Aren’ttheythesame?
Whydon’tmoredefendbotheconomiclibertyandpersonalliberty?
Whyaretherenotmoreindividualswhoseektointellectually
influenceotherstobringaboutpositivechangesthanthosewhoseek
powertoforceotherstoobeytheircommands?
Whydoestheuseofreligiontosupportasocialgospeland
preemptivewars,bothofwhichrequiresauthoritarianstouse
violence,orthethreatofviolence,gounchallenged?Aggressionand
forcedredistributionofwealthhasnothingtodowiththeteachings
oftheworldgreatreligions.
WhydoweallowthegovernmentandtheFederalReserveto
disseminatefalseinformationdealingwithbotheconomicand
foreignpolicy?
Whyisdemocracyheldinsuchhighesteemwhenit’stheenemy
oftheminorityandmakesallrightsrelativetothedictatesofthe
majority?
WhyshouldanyonebesurprisedthatCongresshasnocredibility,
sincethere’ssuchadisconnectbetweenwhatpoliticianssayand
whattheydo?
Isthereanyexplanationforallthedeception,theunhappiness,
thefearofthefuture,thelossofconfidenceinourleaders,the
distrust,theangerandfrustration? Yesthereis,andthere’saway
toreversetheseattitudes. Thenegativeperceptionsarelogical
andaconsequenceofbadpoliciesbringingaboutourproblems.
Identificationoftheproblemsandrecognizingthecauseallowthe
properchangestocomeeasy.
TrustYourself,NottheGovernment
Toomanypeoplehavefortoolongplacedtoomuchconfidenceand
trustingovernmentandnotenoughinthemselves. Fortunately,
manyarenowbecomingawareoftheseriousnessofthegross
mistakesofthepastseveraldecades. Theblameissharedbyboth
politicalparties. ManyAmericansnowaredemandingtohearthe
plaintruthofthingsandwantthedemagoguingtostop. Without
thisfirststep,solutionsareimpossible.
Seekingthetruthandfindingtheanswersinlibertyandself-reliance
promotestheoptimismnecessaryforrestoringprosperity. Thetask
isnotthatdifficultifpoliticsdoesn’tgetintheway.
Wehaveallowedourselvestogetintosuchamessforvariousreasons.
Politiciansdeceivethemselvesastohowwealthisproduced.
Excessiveconfidenceisplacedinthejudgmentofpoliticiansand
bureaucrats. Thisreplacestheconfidenceinafreesociety. Toomany
inhighplacesofauthoritybecameconvincedthatonlythey, armed
witharbitrarygovernmentpower,canbringaboutfairness,while
facilitatingwealthproduction. Thisalwaysprovestobeautopian
dreamanddestroyswealthandliberty. Itimpoverishesthepeople
andrewardsthespecialinterestswhoendupcontrollingboth
politicalparties.
It’snosurprisethenthatmuchofwhatgoesoninWashington
isdrivenbyaggressivepartisanshipandpowerseeking,with
philosophicdifferencesbeingminor.
EconomicIgnorance
Economicignoranceiscommonplace. Keynesianismcontinuesto
thrive,althoughtodayitisfacinghealthyandenthusiasticrebuttals.
BelieversinmilitaryKeynesianismanddomesticKeynesianism
continuetodesperatelypromotetheirfailedpolicies,astheeconomy
languishesinadeepslumber.
Supportersofallgovernmentedictsusehumanitarianargumentsto
justifythem.
Humanitarianargumentsarealwaysusedtojustifygovernment
mandatesrelatedtotheeconomy,monetarypolicy,foreignpolicy,
andpersonalliberty. Thisisonpurposetomakeitmoredifficultto
challenge. But,initiatingviolenceforhumanitarianreasonsisstill
CONTINUEDONPG.29CONTINUEDONPG.29CONTINUEDONCENTERPOSTER

33. 7
IMPORTANT
CONTACTS
other:____________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
CIVIL DEFENCE:___________________________________________________________________________
emergency freequency:________________________________________
POLICE | FIRE | AMBULANCE
DIAL
911
we are always getting new survival items at infowarsshop.com so make sure to check regularly for books, movies, flashlights, etc.
household survival items
ADDRESS:___________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
documents
personal items
birth & marriage certificates
THE AQUA POD KIT
life straw
the pocket socket
thyrosafe
KA350 Voyager Mini
PHONE NUMBERS:____________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
getaway kit
check & replace food & water every
12 months
drivers licences & passports
insurance policies
family photos
towels, toothbrush, soap, & other
sanitary items
a change of clothes
food & water
OTHER SUPPLIES
other emergency items
BABIES & SMALL CHILDREN
drinking water:
{3 liters/day per person}
water for washing & cooking
non-perishable food {canned or
dried}
can opener
gas grill to cook on
waterproof matches
spare batteries
PARTICLE/DUST MASKS
am/fm radio & spare batteries
first aid kit and essential meds
toilet paper and garbage bags
for emergency toilet
PARTICLE/DUST MASKS
PET SUPPLIES
BLANKETS OR SLEEPING BAGS
WIND/SNOW/RAIN-PROOF CLOTHING
DURABLE FOOTWEAR
SUN PROTECTION {HATS/SUNSCREEN}
FOOD/FORMULA/& DRINK
DIAPERS & CHANGE OF CLOTHING
FAVORITE TOY/ACTIVITY
HEARING AIDS
GLASSES/BINOCULARS
MOBILITY AIDS
ASTHMA AND RESPIRATORY AIDS
PERSCRIBED MEDICATIONS
enough for 3
days or more
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
LAST CHECK
With the aftermath of hurricane Sandy resembling the
horrors of Katrina, the government once again has shown
us that they can’t and won’t help in times of crisis.We at
Infowars thought it would be useful to give you a list to
start with when disaster and chaos strike.
Directions: Fill this out, keep it on your fridge, and make
sure everyone in the household understands their role in
your family’s plan when and if anything happens.
infowarsshop.com
1
3
4
5
6
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Alex Jones’ 8-Day
Emergency Grab
and Go Pack
Alex Jones’ 16-Day
Patriot Food Pack
Crystal Quest
Shower Filter
2

36. INFOWARS.COM36

37. “So look, there are fifteen
million votes out there we
haven’t counted yet. What do
you want to do?”
“How long have the polls
been closed?”
“Let’s see. Two hours.”
“The hell with it. Let’s call
it a defeat for Prop 37.”
“Okay.”
T
his isn’t over.
We’re not just looking at how many votes in
California are still uncounted. We’re not just
guessing how it’ll turn out and making little
projections. That’s a sucker’s game.
We’re looking at real symptoms of fraud, and fraud
has tentacles and arms. If you see one piece of fraud,
you keep digging for other pieces. You usually find them.
Start with the incredibly early projections made by
media outlets on election night. Those projections
sank Prop 37.
When you’re in the middle of a football game and the
outcome is still in doubt, if somebody suddenly posts
the final score on the scoreboard, that’s called a lie.
It isn’t an estimate or a guess or a prediction. It’s a lie.
There was once a day in American politics when news
networks would wait for conclusive election results.
They weren’t greedily bent on reporting projections
soon and sooner and soonest.
So let’s get that projection-brainwashing out of our
heads, all right?
The whole business of making early and earlier pre-
dictions on election night is a sham. And it has the
effect of inducing people to tune out.
“Okay, Jones won. That’s that. What percentage of
the votes have been counted? One half of one per-
cent? Zero percent? Gee, I guess these prediction
guys really know what they’re doing. They must have
some fabulous computer models, honey. Let’s watch a
CSI rerun…”
Here is what happened on election night in California.
With many millions of votes still not counted, televi-
sion stations up and down the state sealed the fate of
Prop 37, by saying it had lost.
Many of those California votes are still uncounted.
Yesterday, by consulting four of the 57 county regis-
trars in the state, I found 1.6 million votes still unpro-
cessed. That was chicken feed.
An updated report, as of noon today, November 9,
posted at the California Secretary of State’s website,
indicates that, for all of California, a boggling 3.3 mil-
lion votes remain uncounted.
So who called the shots? Who made the early and
grossly premature projection on election night? Who told
all the media outlets that Prop 37 had been defeated?
I suspected it was Edison Media Research, an outfit
that works for the National Election Pool (NEP). NEP
is a media consortium that supplies election-night
information to the press. This morning I spoke with a
representative of Edison, who told me they didn’t make
the projection on Prop 37.
If true, that leaves Associated Press (AP) as the lead-
ing suspect. AP is part of the National Election Pool as
well. AP has awesome resources.
I spoke with Erin Madigan White, media relations
manager at AP. I asked her whether AP had made the
projections for Prop 37 to media outlets.
She emailed me the following tidbit. It was not quite
an answer to my question, but it was illuminating:
“To clarify: AP does not make ‘projections,’ but
bases our reporting on counting real votes from every
precinct. As our story notes specifically, ‘With all the
state’s precincts reporting, Proposition 37 failed 53.1
percent to 46.9 percent.’”
When someone gives you this kind of sleight-of-hand
maneuver, it’s called a clue. Let’s start with this phrase:
“With all the state’s precincts reporting.” The precincts
were all reporting PARTIAL results. Even today, there
are 3.3 million votes in CA still to be counted.
This tells you that AP was lying. That’s right. Let’s
call it what it was. They were lying about “all pre-
cincts.” It was an intentional con.
And what does the phrase “bases our reporting on
counting real votes” mean? It certainly means “calling
the result of an election.” Because that’s exactly what
AP did with Prop 37, based on partial results, on Nov.8.
That’s a projection. They say they don’t make projec-
tions, but they do. That’s another lie.
On election night, I believe AP must have been the
entity who passed voting information on Prop 37 to
media outlets throughout California.
AP will not speak about their business relationships
with media outlets. They will not name those outlets.
They claim “client confidentiality” on this matter.
Why?
I believe the answer is obvious. AP, the giant wire
service, doesn’t want people to know how much
influence they have on what media outlets report. AP
doesn’t want the public to know how much of the news,
everywhere, comes from AP. And media outlets don’t
want their own customers to know how much of what
they report is really flat-out or recycled AP material.
This powerful AP influence certainly would extend
to election-night reporting.
Knowing how the National Election Pool basically
works, I see no other entity who could have played
that information-provider role for all the networks, TV
stations, radio stations, websites, and newspapers in
California…and in the country, on this past election
night, with respect to Prop 37.
With millions of votes outstanding and uncounted, I
conclude it was AP who provided the data to the net-
works, who then made the early calls against Prop 37
and sank it.
After posting an original article, which exposed
the big lie about Prop 37 early projections, I received
many emails.
Most of the emailers stated they were glad to get the
information. A few people questioned my report. They
said, “Well, a hundred percent of voting precincts have
already sent their vote-counts to the Secretary of State
of California.”
Wrong. A hundred percent of precincts have sent
PARTIAL vote-counts to the Secretary of State.
A few people said, “Well, the counties in California,
who are in charge of counting all votes in their dis-
tricts, have several weeks to wrap up the count. That
happens in every election. Nothing new there.”
I know that. My attack is leveled at the early call
against Prop 37 given to the media, on election night,
when so many votes were still uncounted, when there
was no way to know the final outcome.
A few people said, “Well, of the votes that remain to
be counted in California, about two-thirds would have
to go YES ON 37 to swing 37 over into victory. That
won’t happen.”
Let’s leave that question to the actual vote-count. But
written by JON RAPPOPORT
PRISONPLANET.COM 37

38. INFOWARS.COM
we’re not only talking about the odds
of getting a victory through counting
the rest of the votes. With these hor-
rendous early projections, we’re look-
ing at a symptom of huge fraud here.
The smoke in front of the fire:
Who can guarantee that the votes
already tallied in California were done
faithfully and honestly? Who can
guarantee that the voting machines
were accurately recording votes?
Given AP’s replies to me, and their
policy of secrecy about their media
clients, who wants to trust that news
giant?
Concerning machine vote-fraud,
wake up and smell the coffee. See Bev
Harris’ work at blackboxvoting.org
and also Victoria Collier’s important
articles on this subject. Read up on
the 2000 Bush-Gore fiasco and the
2004 Bush-Kerry voting nightmare
(especially in Ohio).
Many people have emailed me to
ask, “What can we do now?” First of
all, the YES ON 37 people have to for-
get about their concession of defeat.
They need to get busy and look
into vote fraud.
They have to come back to the play-
ing field.
To return to the football analogy, if you’re in the middle of
the game and somebody suddenly posts the final score on the
scoreboard, do you hang your head and walk off and accept
the loss? Is that what you do?
Do you bow down to the system, because you’re afraid that,
if you object, people will label you “sour grapes” and crazy?
Or do you become more relentless?
YES ON 37 needs to demand to look at the voting machines,
the software used in the vote-count. YES ON 37 needs to
probe, with all they have, into what AP did on election night.
And that’s just for starters. Bring on the lawyers. Make some
real waves. Shake people up.
Think about this as well. Why was Prop 37 launched in
California? Why not Arkansas or Louisiana?
Because it’s well-known that California, historically and
presently, is the core of the natural health movement in
America. CA is where it really took hold and spread. CA is
where everybody and his brother want gluten-free bicycles
and organic streetlamps and raw unpas-
teurized sunglasses and GMO-free
underwear.
The sentiment for Prop 37 was over-
whelming a couple of months ago. Then,
boom. Everything went the other way. It
wasn’t just the NO ON 37 ads. It wasn’t
just the massive spending by the NO ON
37 forces.
The real specter of vote fraud is here,
whether you like it or not.
If, indeed, AP made the early reports
or projections or suggestions or advices
of defeat for 37 to media outlets, let’s see
their data and their models of interpre-
tation. Did they do exit polls? I’ve never
heard of AP conducting exit polls.
If as AP claims, they don’t do projec-
tions, are we supposed to believe they
sent out nothing more than raw-vote
counts to a few thousand media outlets
in California, and each and every one
of those outlets decided, on their own,
through their own analysis, that Prop
37 was a lost cause early on election
night?
Don’t believe that for a second. These
local TV stations and newspapers aren’t
independent enough to do that kind of
projecting on their own. They were tak-
ing advice from somewhere. They were
all falling into line. They were merely mouthpieces for some-
one’s projection.
This should trouble you. It should trouble you greatly. Unless
you’re so enamored of projections and computer modeling and
data interpretation and honest and honorable vote machines
that you’re sure everything is just fine and dandy.
Early dismissive projections on election night are part and
parcel of the Big Con. They are wands waved that put people
to sleep and elections to bed.
So, no, Virginia. No. Everything is not okay.
The author of an explosive collection, THE MATRIX
REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a U.S. Congressional
seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a
Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter
for 30 years and has delivered lectures and seminars to
audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free
emails at www.nomorefakenews.com and read more articles
at http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com

39. PRISONPLANET.COM
THEPLAYLIST

40. INFOWARS.COM
O
n Oct. 24, NBC news put out an article attempt-
ing to refute a recent study published in the
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition which
found that drinking as little as one diet soda
sweetened with Aspartame per day could cause an
increased risk of leukemia and lymphoma in adults.
Claiming the study was “weak science,” NBC news
failed to mention the fact that this latest research is the
most thorough on aspartame to date, involving more
than 2 million years of human life data spanning 22
years from more than 77,000 women and 48,000 men.
The NBC story also claims “Few reporters read that
journal,” in reference to American Journal of Clinical
Nutrition, even though it was selected by the Special
Libraries Association as one of the top 100 most
influential journals in Biology and Medicine in the
last 100 years.
Aspartame (otherwise known by its brand names
NutraSweet and Equal or alternate monicker
Acesulfame Potassium) is one of the most widely used
artificial sweeteners on the market today. Found in
thousands of foods and beverages including chewing
gum, candies, diet soft drinks, desserts, yogurt, condi-
ments and even vitamins and pharmaceuticals, aspar-
tame is not limited only to
“sugar-free” diet products. It
is virtually impossible to find
commercially available gum
that does not contain aspar-
tame these days.
The average grocery store
is rife with aspartame-filled
products, so it would likely
surprise the average con-
sumer to find that it took
the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) more
than 20 years to approve
aspartame’s use.
What is aspartame exactly,
and if its so healthy and safe,
why did it take so long for
the FDA to approve it?
Aspartame is the excre-
ment of genetically mod-
ified E. coli bacteria. It is
comprised of 40 percent
aspartic acid, 50 percent
phenylalanine and 10 per-
cent methanol. Aspartic acid
acts as a neurotransmitter,
and too much can actually
THE DANGERS OF
ASPARTAMEover-excite the cells (known as an “excitotoxin”), thus
stimulating them to death. Keep in mind, the blood
brain barrier cannot prevent this in many people, as it
does not fully protect all areas of the brain, especially in
someone already suffering from other chronic diseases
and disorders, and the barrier is not fully developed in
children. While phenylalanine is an amino acid already
present in the brain, excess levels can cause serotonin
to decrease over time, which can lead to chemical
imbalances that cause depression and other mood
and emotional disorders. Methanol is an industrial
solvent, is used as fuel and antifreeze, and is a main
ingredient in many paints and varnish removers. The
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) warns
that methanol ingestion may result in neurological
damage (specifically “permanent motor dysfunction”)
PUBLICATION TITLE
American Journal of
Clinical Nutrition
Consumption of artificial sweetener and sugar-containing soda and risk of
lymphoma and leukemia in men and women
Appetite Saccharin and aspartame, compared with sucrose, induce greater weight gain in
adult Wistar rats, at similar total caloric intake levels
Contact Dermatitis Systemic allergic dermatitis presumably caused by formaldehyde derived from
aspartame
Drug and Chemical
Toxicology
Long-term consumption of aspartame and brain antioxidant defense status
Journal of Biosciences Effect of chronic exposure to aspartame on oxidative stress in the brain of
albino rats
Neurotoxicity
Research
Effect of aspartame on oxidative stress and monoamine neurotransmitter levels
in lipopolysaccharide-treated mice
Nutrition and
Metabolism
Interactive effects of neonatal exposure to monosodium glutamate and
aspartame on glucose homeostasis
PLOS One Gender dimorphism in aspartame-induced impairment of spatial cognition and
insulin sensitivity
written by MELISSA MELTON
Figure 1
MILLIONS OF PEOPLE
CONSUME ASPARTAME
EVERYSINGLE DAY, ITWAS
NEVERTESTED ON HUMANS
PRIORTO ITS APPROVAL.
and visual disturbances leading to blurred or dimmed
vision and eventually blindness.
While Searle Pharmaceuticals attempted to attain
approval for aspartame in the late 1970s, due to multiple
studies provided on the negative effects of the chemical
in lab animals — including the fact that it actually ate
holes in their brains — the FDA set up a public board of
inquiry to investigate the matter in 1980. Based on the
findings, the board found that aspartame might cause
cancer and concluded the sweetener could not be put
on the market until further testing was completed. It
INFOWARS SPECIAL REPORT:
40