2. Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Management (ICETEM14)
step up conversion ratio [3]. It can be used in both CCM (continuous conduction mode) and DCM (discontinuous
conduction mode). But the disadvantage is that it can be applied for boost operations only. Apart from this it is suffered
from high inrush current and isolation problems. As an advance in technology in this paper Cuk converter is used as a
PFC converter [4].
The topology based on Cuk converter offers many advantages when compared to other converter topologies. It
includes automatic current shaping, both input and
implementation, protection from inrush currents etc. Proposed Cuk converter is subjected to be operated in discontinuous
conduction mode (DCM) which aids to achieve near unity power fac
zero current switching (ZCS) turn ON and turn OFF are possible
three semiconductors in current path. Compared with SEPIC converter
currents even at low ripple. So Cuk converter acts as a common selector in major basic topologies.
2. CONVENTIONAL CUK PFC CONVERTER
A conventional PFC Cuk rectifier is drawn in Fig 1. From the circuit, when switch Q
through three power semiconductor devices. That is two bridge diodes and one switch. Likewise when the switch is OFF,
current will flow through three diodes. So in every switching period current flow through three semiconductor devices
this will result in conduction losses and poor efficiency.
Fig 1: Conventional PFC Cuk converter
3. PROPOSED TOPOLOGY
In order to reduce the conduction losses and to improve the power supply efficiency, a Cuk converter bridgeless
topology is employed. The Cuk converter in DCM offers improved current shaping properties as compared with other fly
back converters .apart from all of this the major advantage is concerned with losses in switches and diodes. The
performance of new topology is compared with that of the conventional
Fig 2. Along with it block diagram regarding the proposed system is also shown.
International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Management (ICETEM14)
30-31, December, 2014, Ernakulam, India
192
can be used in both CCM (continuous conduction mode) and DCM (discontinuous
conduction mode). But the disadvantage is that it can be applied for boost operations only. Apart from this it is suffered
problems. As an advance in technology in this paper Cuk converter is used as a
The topology based on Cuk converter offers many advantages when compared to other converter topologies. It
includes automatic current shaping, both input and output continuous currents, less ripple content in input current, easy
implementation, protection from inrush currents etc. Proposed Cuk converter is subjected to be operated in discontinuous
conduction mode (DCM) which aids to achieve near unity power factor and reduced total harmonic distortion (THD). Also
nd turn OFF are possible. Moreover the selected topology still has a problem those
three semiconductors in current path. Compared with SEPIC converter [8], Cuk converter has continuous input and output
currents even at low ripple. So Cuk converter acts as a common selector in major basic topologies.
CONVENTIONAL CUK PFC CONVERTER
A conventional PFC Cuk rectifier is drawn in Fig 1. From the circuit, when switch Q
through three power semiconductor devices. That is two bridge diodes and one switch. Likewise when the switch is OFF,
current will flow through three diodes. So in every switching period current flow through three semiconductor devices
this will result in conduction losses and poor efficiency.
Fig 1: Conventional PFC Cuk converter
In order to reduce the conduction losses and to improve the power supply efficiency, a Cuk converter bridgeless
topology is employed. The Cuk converter in DCM offers improved current shaping properties as compared with other fly
back converters .apart from all of this the major advantage is concerned with losses in switches and diodes. The
y is compared with that of the conventional type [9]. The proposed circuit
Fig 2. Along with it block diagram regarding the proposed system is also shown.
Fig 3: Bridgeless Cuk Rectifier
International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Management (ICETEM14)
, December, 2014, Ernakulam, India
can be used in both CCM (continuous conduction mode) and DCM (discontinuous
conduction mode). But the disadvantage is that it can be applied for boost operations only. Apart from this it is suffered
problems. As an advance in technology in this paper Cuk converter is used as a
The topology based on Cuk converter offers many advantages when compared to other converter topologies. It
output continuous currents, less ripple content in input current, easy
implementation, protection from inrush currents etc. Proposed Cuk converter is subjected to be operated in discontinuous
tor and reduced total harmonic distortion (THD). Also
. Moreover the selected topology still has a problem those
erter has continuous input and output
currents even at low ripple. So Cuk converter acts as a common selector in major basic topologies.
A conventional PFC Cuk rectifier is drawn in Fig 1. From the circuit, when switch Q is ON current flows
through three power semiconductor devices. That is two bridge diodes and one switch. Likewise when the switch is OFF,
current will flow through three diodes. So in every switching period current flow through three semiconductor devices,
In order to reduce the conduction losses and to improve the power supply efficiency, a Cuk converter bridgeless
topology is employed. The Cuk converter in DCM offers improved current shaping properties as compared with other fly
back converters .apart from all of this the major advantage is concerned with losses in switches and diodes. The
]. The proposed circuit is shown below in
3. Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Management (ICETEM14)
30-31, December, 2014, Ernakulam, India
193
The bridgeless Cuk rectifier is formed by connecting two DC-DC converters together. For every switching cycle
each converter operates for time (T/2) of the total time. From figure, when switch is ON, the current Iac flows through
L1, Q1 and Dp. Likewise when switch is OFF, current flows through diode D01.So in each case, current flows through one
or more semiconductor device. As a result the conduction losses in active and passive switches are reduced and circuit
efficiency is considerably reduced. Here the slow recovery diodes Dp and Dn always connect the output voltage to input
ac line voltage in order to prevent the common mode noise problems. Thus the circuit is free from noise and EMI
problems [8]. Also by the reduction of conduction losses, energy savings as well as cost savings can be achieved. In fig
(3), there are two recovery diodes along with the two switches. The switches are operated with same control circuitry.
That is switch Q1 is turned ON for positive cycle and Q2 vice versa. As a result the complexity of the circuit can be
reduced [10].
4. MODE OF OPERATION
Before the explanation some assumptions has to be made. The converter should be operated in steady state
condition. The components should be ideal and lossless. The value of output capacitor should be large enough to
withstand the voltage stresses. Due to symmetry only positive half cycle is to be analyzed. During the positive half cycle,
the first half of the circuit involves in the operation. That is the path L1-Q1-C1-L01-D01 is active through diode Dp which
connects input source and output. Likewise during the negative half cycle, the path L2-Q2-C2-L02-D02 is active which
connects input and output. The Cuk converter is operating in its discontinuous conduction mode which offers additional
advantages like natural near unity power factor, zero current switching etc [10].
5. CONVERTER DESIGN
For DCM operation the following condition should be satisfied.
Ke<Ke-crict=1/2(M+sin(ωt))2
(1)
Where Ke is the dimension parameter and is given by,
Ke=2Le/RL.TS (2)
Let the other parameters be:
Input voltage = 100Vrms, output voltage = 48V, power = 150W.
From this, output current I0 = 3.12A. the load resistance is given by V = I × R and obtained as 15.3Ω. Assume the output
voltage is less than 1% and the switching frequency be 50KHZ.
∆iL1 < 10% IL1 (3)
∆IL2 = (1-D)/F.L2 (4)
∆VC1 = D.Vd.Id/V0.C.F (5)
∆IL1 = D.Vin/ L.F1 (6)
From the above equations the values of inductor and capacitor are obtained as:
L1= L2=1mH
L01=L02=22µH
C1=C2=1µF
Cout=12000Μf
4. Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Management (ICETEM14)
6. SIMULATION AND MODELLING
Fig 4: Simulation diagram of conventional Cuk converter
International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Management (ICETEM14)
30-31, December, 2014, Ernakulam, India
194
SIMULATION AND MODELLING
Fig 4: Simulation diagram of conventional Cuk converter
Fig 5: Output voltage and current
Fig 6: THD of conventional Cuk
International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Management (ICETEM14)
, December, 2014, Ernakulam, India
5. Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Management (ICETEM14)
In fig 4, simulation diagram of conventional Cuk converter is shown. And in
waveforms of voltages and THD are shown. The power factor is measured in terms of THD. Apart from this in figures
7,8,9 the proposed topology is shown. When compared the THD is reduced from 14.17% to 5.26%, which shows that the
proposed system has reduced losses.bas a result the efficiency is higher than that of conventional system.
Input voltage
Switching Frequency
Input inductors L1
Output inductors L
Energy transfer capacitors C
Filter capacitors C
Active Switches Q
Output diodes Do, D
Input diodes Dp and D
Filter L & C
International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Management (ICETEM14)
30-31, December, 2014, Ernakulam, India
195
Fig 7: Bridgeless Cuk Converter
Fig 8: Output voltage and current
TABLE I: SIMULATION DETAILS
In fig 4, simulation diagram of conventional Cuk converter is shown. And in fig 5 & 6 the corresponding
waveforms of voltages and THD are shown. The power factor is measured in terms of THD. Apart from this in figures
7,8,9 the proposed topology is shown. When compared the THD is reduced from 14.17% to 5.26%, which shows that the
proposed system has reduced losses.bas a result the efficiency is higher than that of conventional system.
180V
Switching Frequency 20 kHz
1 and L2 1Mh
Output inductors Lo1 and Lo2 22µH
Energy transfer capacitors C1 and C2 1µF
capacitors Co 12000 µF
Active Switches Q1 and Q2 Rds-on=29mΏ
, Do1 and Do2 Vf =0.9V
and Dn Vf =0.7V
L=1e-4
& C=39e-2
International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Management (ICETEM14)
, December, 2014, Ernakulam, India
fig 5 & 6 the corresponding
waveforms of voltages and THD are shown. The power factor is measured in terms of THD. Apart from this in figures
7,8,9 the proposed topology is shown. When compared the THD is reduced from 14.17% to 5.26%, which shows that the
proposed system has reduced losses.bas a result the efficiency is higher than that of conventional system.
6. Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Management (ICETEM14)
30-31, December, 2014, Ernakulam, India
196
Fig 9: THD of bridgeless converter
7. CONCLUSION
A new topology based on Cuk converter is proposed and simulated. The proposed topology is simulated with
induction motor load. By this the power factor of an IM is increased and considerable efficiency can be achieved. By
considering all other converter topologies, Cuk converter becomes the best solution. Apart from conventional systems,
bridgeless topologies yield more efficiency and energy savings. As IM are the most commonly used electric motors, the
increase in pf and efficiency had lead to tremendous changes in industrial sector
REFERENCES
[1] J.F.Gieras and M.Wing, Permanent Magnet Motor Technology—Design and Application. New York: Marcel
Dekker, 2002
[2] N. Mohan, M. Undeland, and W. P. Robbins, Power Electronics: Converters, Applications And Design.
Hoboken, Nj: Wiley, 1995
[3] W. Choi, J.Kwon, E. Kim, J. Lee, and B.Kwon, “Bridgeless Boost Rectifier with Low Conduction Losses and
Reduced Diode Reverse-Recovery Problems” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol. 54, No. 2, Pp. 769–780, Apr.
2007
[4] W. Wei, L. Hongpeng, J. Shigong, And X. Dianguo, “A Novel Bridgeless Buck-Boost PFC Converter,” In Proc.
IEEE Power Electron. Spec. Conf., 2008, Pp. 1304–1308.
[5] Yungtaek Jang, Milan M Jovanovic “Bridgeless High Power Factor Buck Converter”, IEEE Trans. Power
Electron., Vol. 26, No. 2, Pp. 291–297, Feb. 2011
[6] M. Mahdavi and H. Farzanehfard, “Bridgeless Sepic PFC Rectifier With reduced Components and Conduction
Losses,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol. 58, No. 9, Pp. 4153–4160, Sep. 2011.
[7] Sebastian, J., Cobos, J.A., Lopera, J.M., and Uceda, J.: ‘The Determination of Boundaries Between Continuous
And Discontinuous Conduction Mode In PWM Dc-To-Dc Converters Used As Power Factor Regulators’, IEEE
Trans. Power Electronics, 1995, 10, (5)
[8] Cnnda. Sabzali, E. H. Ismail, M. Al-Saffar, and A Fardoun, “New Bridgeless DCM Sepic and CukPFC Rectifiers
With Low Conduction And Switching losses,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., Vol. 47, No. 2, Pp. 873–881, Mar./Apr.
2011.
[9] Huai Wei, “Comparison of Basic Converter Topologies for Power Factor Correction” University Of Central
Florida, -Orlando, 1998
[10] E.H.Ismailabbas.A.Fardoun,Ahmad.J.Sabazali mustafa.A.Al-Saffar “New Efficient Bridgeless Cuk Rectifiers
For PFC Applications,” IEEE Trans. Power Electronics Vol. 27, No. 7, July. 2012.
[11] Herawati Yusuf, “The Influence Of Air Gaps At 0.4 Duty Cycle On Magnetic Core Type ‘E’ To Increase The
Efficiency of Cuk Converter” International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology (IJEET), Volume 4,
Issue 2, 2013, pp. 71 - 80, ISSN Print : 0976-6545, ISSN Online: 0976-6553.