Presentation for IT8000

1. *
Michelle (Marotti) Murphy

2. *Meckel, Stanoevska-Slabeva, &
Martignoni (2006) argue that Web
2.0 is not a technology but a
philosophy “The objective of all
Web 2.0 services is to mutually
maximize the collective intelligence
of the participants” (p. 12).
*“People who live in the intersection
of social worlds are at higher risk of
having good ideas” Burt, 2005, p. 90

3. O'Reilly notes the capacity of Web 2.0 for harnessing
collective intelligence
Web 2.0 tools utilize individual and group contributions
to create value.
Web 2.0 may have its most pervasive impact on
learning outside of formal contexts.
Studies demonstrate how Web 2.0 tools are helping
integrate formal education with the real lives and
informal learning experiences of students
Web 2.0 affords the use of lightweight, readily
accessible, and low-cost learning applications and
tools.
*

4. *The term began in a brainstorming
session with Tim O’Reilly as a platform
to harvest collective intelligence
*The purpose was to facilitate creativity,
collaboration and sharing.
*

5. *Networks are defined as a system of people
or things that communicate with each other
and work together as a unit. Connections are
necessary to be part of the network.
*Networks add diversity to learning
*George Siemens has coined the term and
identified networked learning as a subset of
connectivism.
*Connected learning is a blend of formal,
informal and social learning.
*

6. *Garrison and
Anderson developed
this model based on
the premise that
social presence,
cognitive presence
and teaching
presence interact
to create an
engaging learning
environment.
Garrison and Anderson 2001
*

7. “The network is
characterized by
more fluid
membership,
emergent control,
persistence, and
“This model is the participation
mainstream of marked ebbs and
formal education flows of
today” interaction”
*