Running head B & G FOODS (BGS) COMPANY 1B & G FOODS (BGS) C.docx

Running head: B & G FOODS (BGS) COMPANY
1
B & G FOODS (BGS) COMPANY
11
B & G Foods (BGS) Company
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
1. Background and Industry of the company
B & G Foods (BGS) is an American holding food company
headquartered in Parsippany-Toy Hills, New Jersey, in the
United States. The company was created in 1889 to sell pickles,
condiments, and relish. It has multiple subsidiary branches both
in North and South America. Currently, the company
manufactures, markets, and distributes various portfolios of
shelf-stable and frozen foods both in North and South America.
Besides, the company deals with a variety of foodstuffs,
including vegetables and cereals. B & G Foods (BGS) operates
in the Packaged Foods Industry, where there is a large firm with
huge capital based. However, the company is among the top-
performing companies in the industry, with approximately an
annual revenue of $ 1.7 billion (NYSE, 2019).
2. Common size analysis
B & G Foods, Inc. is an international company operating mainly
between two continents of North and South America. B & G
Foods, Inc is a medium-sized company 2,590 employees
comprising of both casuals and full-time employees. It is a fast-
growing company and has been reporting a tremendous growth
in its annual revenues. For instance, in 2018, the company
reported yearly revenue of $1.7 billion (NYSE, 2019). The
amount was relatives higher compared to the total revenues
earned in the previous years.

B & G Food Inc, possess strong entrepreneurial skills that
enable the management to run all organizational activities more
efficiently. Despite the size of the company, the management of
B & G Foods ensures proper time management to ensure the
smooth running of operations. The top management also
engages in strategic thinking to identify various ways that can
help in improving the efficiency and effectiveness of different
activities in different departments (NYSE, 2019).
The managerial system of B & G Foods is relatively advanced
compared to other firms in the same industry. The management
of the company smoothly facilitates running the routine
activities of the company regardless of external threats to
ensure that each department achieves that expected goals. The
latter has helped in promoting the overall growth of the firm
because most of organizational goals and objectives are met as
anticipated (NYSE, 2019).
Financial ability is another factor that is considered in the
determination of the size of a company. B & G Food Company
has a stream of revenues from sales of its products. Frequently
cash inflows increase the company's capital base that making it
have enough finances to run all organizational activities. Sale of
manufactured products is the primary source of funds for B & G
Foods Company (NYSE, 2019). Statistically, B & G Food's
sales volumes have been increasing annually, which increases
its financial ability to expand its operation to different parts of
the world.
The availability of labor is another factor that determines the
size of a firm. The size and quality of work a company can be
used to assess its overall size. On the same note, B & G Foods
has relative significant numbers of employees comprising of
both casual and full-time employees. Currently, the company
has 2,590 employees at its headquarter site who perform

different activities (NYSE, 2019). The number of the company's
employees is much higher than the number of employees in the
same industry, which indicates that B & G Foods is a medium-
sized company.
The size s of the market the company sells its products is
relatively large compared to market size served by other firms
in the same industry. It sells its products both in the North and
South American countries, including Mexico, Canada, and the
United States, among other countries. The size of this market it
serves is prominent due to high demands from customers. Since
the company still targets only the North and South American
countries but no other markets from oversea countries, it is a
medium-sized company.
3. Trend analysis of B & G Foods Company
Trend analysis refers to the process analysis business
information of a firm for an extended period to identify
consistency in performance. There are vital factors that are
considered while performing a company's trend analysis. The
key factors that are always considered while performing trend
analysis of a firm include gross profit, cost of labor, sales
volume turnover, debts production levels, and marketing, among
other factors.
B & G Foods' general performance has improved over the past
five years. The main reason for such positive results is because
of an increase in net sales of the company for five years. For
instance, since 2014, the company's net sales have increased
from $ 837.3 million to $ 958.9 million in 2015, progressively
to $ 1.7 billion in 2018 (NYSE, 2019).
Besides, the company's expenses have also been fluctuating for
the past five years. The variation in net expenditures is
attributed to the change in organizational operation and the
influence of both internal and external factors. For instance, in

2014, the net expenses of the company were $ 22,821, in 2015
the value increased to $ 52, 149 but later reduced to $ (69,401)
in 2017 and in 2018 the value was $ 49, 842 (NYSE, 2019). The
fluctuation is caused by various factors the management can
slightly control the.
Additionally, the company's human resource management has
improved in the last five years. The improvement is caused by
the rise of organizational activities over the years. For example,
in 2014, the company had approximately 1600 employees;
however, the number has been increasing steadily from 1600
employees to a current number of 2,590 employees (NASDAQ,
2019).
In general, the company's size and performance has increased
over the last five years. Its annual revenues have been growing
steadily since 2014. Also, the company has adopted the use of
advanced technology components to help in performing
different organizational activities to achieve the company's
targets.
4. Financial ratio analysis of B & G Foods Inc
Financial ration analysis involves assessing the performance of
various ratios. In this section, the key ratios that will be
analyzed include liquidity ratios, profitability ratios, operating
performance ratios, and return on investment ratios.
1. Liquidity ratios
Ratios/ Year
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Current ratio
2.12
3.43
2.63

4.40
2.27
Quick ratio
0.97
1.11
1.29
1.91
0.72
Net-working capital ratio
2.98
3.71
2.18
2.52
1.82
Analysis
Liquidity ratios are used to evaluate the capacity of a business
to services its short term obligations. Current ratios assist
investors and creditors in understanding if the company can pay
all its current liabilities. A relative higher current ratio is
constructive for a company than a lower ratio. Since 2014, B &
G Foods Inc.'s current ratio has been fluctuating, and its value
is above 2.0 (NASDAQ, 2019). The values imply that the
company is capable of serving its short term liabilities using its
current assets.
Besides, the company's quick ratios from 2014 to 2018 are
slightly more than zero. The figures infer that the company has
been able to slight pay for its short-term responsibilities using
its quick assets. (NASDAQ, 2019) For instance, in 2014 and
2018, its quick ratio values were 0.97 and 0.72, respectively.
The values imply that the company could not meet its short-term
obligations using its quick assets.
Lastly, B & G Foods Inc.'s net working capital is relatively
higher for the five years. Higher positive values of the ratio
infer that the company is capable of settling its current
liabilities using its existing assets.
2. Profitability ratios

Ratios/ Year
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Gross Profit Margin
29.25%
30.02%
31.27%
26.79%
20.52%
Operating Profit Margin
13.68%
17.91%
18.44%
14.46%
19.93%
Net Profit Margin
4.83%
8.12%
7.94%
13.24%
10.17%
Analysis
A profitability ratio is metrics utilized to evaluate the capability
of a firm to make revenues relative to its operating costs,
retained earnings, assets, and shareholders' equity. According to
the values of gross profit margin, the company is capable of
generating revenues from the sale of its inventories. The figure
mirrors the excellent performance of the company since its
margin has been more than 20.0 % (NASDAQ, 2019).
On the other hand, the operating profit margin is an expression
of the percentage of the total revenue made up of total operating
income. From the results of the company's operating profit
margin, the values illustrate that B & G Foods Inc. has been

making slightly reasonable profits from 2014 to 2018 (NYSE,
2019).
Lastly, the net profit margin has been low for the last five. The
values of the ratio for five years implies that the company's net
profit has been small for five years. A less net profit is likely to
affect the company's activities besides building future
investments.
3. Return on Investment ratios
Ratios/ Year
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Earning Power ratio
29.25%
30.02%
31.27%
26.79%
20.52%
ROA
2.51%
3.64%
3.98%
6.71%
5.21%
ROE
11.37%
16.18%
15.40%
26.82%
20.16%
Typically, the return on investment ratios is utilized to measure
the value of profits that a corporation from investing its assets
or shareholders' equity. According to the figures in the table
above, B & G Foods Inc. has been earning a relatively

reasonable amount from investing its assets and shareholders'
equity.
In general, B & G Foods Inc. is liquid because it has been able
to use its current assets to meet all its short-term obligations.
However, some ratios are slightly low, which shows that the
company is at risk of failing to meet some of its commitments
in case the values continue to decline (NASDAQ, 2019). As
such, if the management wants to improve the company's
performance, they should reduce operating expenses and
increase long term investments.
5. Evaluation of B & G Foods Return on Equity
Return on Equity = (Net income/ Shareholders) x 100 %
2016
Net income = $ 0.11 billion
Shareholders’ equity = $ 0.79 billion
Return on Equity = ($ 0.11 billion/$ 0.79 billion) x 100 %
Return on Equity = 15.40 %
2017
2018
Explanation
B & G Foods Inc. has had an increase in ROE. Statistically, the
company’s return on shareholders’ equity has been increasing
progressively annually. For example, in 2016, the value was
15.40 %, while in the subsequent year, that value rose to
26.82%. The increase in the return on equity illustrates a good
performance. However, in 2016, the company's return on equity
slightly reduced to 15.40 %, which implies that the company
generated less amount of revenues for its investment

(NASDAQ, 2019). Usually, a decrease in return on equity
reduces the interest of shareholders to invest more in the
company. As such, it is prudent for the management to identify
the best investments that can regularly increase return on
shareholders' equity.
According to NASDAQ (2019), B & G Foods Inc.'s return on
equity tremendously increased in 2017 from 15.40% to 26.82%
the increase shows that there was a general improvement in
performance in 2017. The percentage increase in return on
equity was attributed to the rise in the company's revenues from
the investment of shareholders' equity. Usually, ROE is used to
assess the value of yields that a company from investing its
shareholders' equity. Therefore, the increase in ROE indicates
that B & G Foods Inc. generated a large amount of money from
investing its shareholders' equity in various activities. As such,
it is imperative for the management of B & G Foods Inc to
identify the best investment to venture shareholders' equity to
maximize the profitability of the firm. The primary cause of the
changes in Return on Equity is the rise in net income of the
business. Besides, according to the industry analysis, B & G
Foods has reported a high return on equity compared to some of
its competitors.
6. Recommendations
Statistically, B & G Foods Company's financial performance is
average. Its annual revenues have increased over the past five
years. The increase is attributed to excellent management skills
and entrepreneurial skills that assist in enhancing organizational
activities. For the company to realize better performance in the
future, the management should consider the following
recommendation:
i. The management should adopt the used of advanced
technology in the production of its products to improve the
quality of its products. In doing so, it will be able to increase its
sales volume as well as increasing its competitive advantage in
the market.
ii. The management should also pay more attention to

empowering employees by providing a conducive working
environment to motivate them to remain loyal and committed to
their duties.
iii. The company needs to properly manage its annual expenses
to increase its revenues in the future.
iv. There is a need for the management to manage the company's
both current and fixed assets. In doing so, the company will be
able to service its short-term obligations by its assets.
v. The board of management of B & G Foods Inc. should
increase the company’s retained earnings and use it to invest in
profitable investments to improve the profitability of the
company.
vi. For the company to improve its liquidity, the management
should shift from short-term obligations to long-term debts. In
doing so, the firm will realize an increase in its quick and
current ratios. As a result, B & G Foods will be able properly to
manage its obligations; thus, it will enable the company to have
better financial performance in the future.
vii. Lastly, B & G Foods should get rid of unproductive assets.
7. Reflection
Generally, the financial ratios are useful in a business set up
because they help in assessing the performance of a company.
Some of the ratios used to evaluate organizational performance
include profitability ratios, liquidity ratios, and Return on
Investment ratios. Profitability ratios are to assess the ability of
a firm to generate revenues relative to its operating costs,
retained earnings, assets, and shareholders' equity. Liquidity
ratios used to determine the capacity of a firm to services its
short term obligations. While Return on Investment ratios are
utilized to measure the value of returns that a firm from
investing its assets or shareholders' equity. Therefore, the
management of B & G Foods Inc. should properly handle these
ratios to evaluate the performance of the company
appropriately. The latter will help to get rid of unproductive
assets and operations to improve the company's performance in
the future.

References
NYSE (2019). B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS). Accessed from
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/BGS?p=BGS&.tsrc=fin-srch
NASDAQ (2019). B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS). Financial
performance. Accessed from
https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/wall-street-eats-bg-foods-
steady-financial-growth-2012-08-24
NYSE (2019). B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS). Profitability ratios.
Retrieved from https://www.nyse.com/quote/XNYS:BGS
Stuck with excess inventory, Neptune Gourmet Seafood is
toying with the idea of launching a second,
inexpensive product line. But if Neptune stoops to conquer,
rivals might retaliate with price cuts, and
the new line might end up cannibalizing the old.
HBR's cases, which are fictional, present common managerial
dilemmas and offer concrete solutions from experts.
JIM HARGROVE'S startled expression would have been
amusing had he not been in such a pitiable state. He was
standing in the yacht's magnificently appointed galley,
wondering if his stomach would be able to hold down the cola
he was pouring into a crystal flute, when his colleague, Rita
Sanchez, said something outrageous. Now the drink had
spilled down the length of his pleated khakis, and he was
sputtering. "You aren't seriously suggesting that we reduce

prices by 50%. Are you?”
It had been a long day for Hargrove, marketing director of $820
million Neptune Gourmet Seafood, North America's
third-largest seafood producer. When the firm's chairman and
CEO, Stanley Renser, had invited his senior managers
to sail with him to inspect one of Neptune's new freezer
trawlers, Hargrove had demurred. He hated sailing on small
boats-they made him sick, he told his boss. Renser had pointed
out that the 120-foot yacht he owned wasn't exactly
small. Besides, Poseidon II never rolled, even in a storm; the
renowned Tommaso Spadolini had designed it. In fact,
it was one of the last boats built by Italy's famous Tecnomarine
boatyard! Eventually, Renser had won him over, and
Hargrove had arrived that Friday morning as eager to see the
yacht as he was to visit one of the state-of-the-art
fishing vessels on which Neptune had bet its future.
Hargrove hadn't felt seasick all morning. There were no swells
that day. Flat and glassy, the ocean glittered in shades
of turquoise, silver, and gold. Aboard the freezer trawler, he
had been fascinated by the technologies that allowed
the vessel to catch fish in an environ- mentally sustainable way
and to freeze them in a manner that gave Neptune

an edge over rivals. But when the yacht had started to head back
to Fort Lauderdale, Hargrove had crumpled. While
his colleagues had made a beeline for the sundeck, he had spent
the afternoon in the oak-lined main saloon, where
he'd sunk into a leather sofa, clenching and unclenching his
muscles to fight the ocean's incessant motion.
Tired of trying to take his mind off the problem by focusing on
the distant horizon, Hargrove was exploring the galley
when Sanchez, his counterpart in sales, had walked in.
"Hey, Jim. You better?" she had asked solicitously.
"I'll survive" Hargrove had grimaced. "We can't be too far from
home now. But let's not talk about it. What's
happening topside?”
"Oh, nothing much. Stanley's showing people the garage where
he parks the water scooters and Windsurfers,"
Sanchez informed him. She gave Hargrove a challenging look
and added: "You want to hear something that'll really
take your mind off your seasickness? I'm convinced that we
have to drop our prices by 40% to 50%-and soon.”
Big Fish in a Small Pond
Hargrove snatched a stack of cocktail napkins to mop up the

cola, but his eyes never left Sanchez's face. He hoped
she'd break into a smile to indicate that she was teasing him
about the price cut. It had to be a joke, right? Seafood
was a high-end business in North America, and Neptune was an
upmarket--many believed the most upmarket--
player in the $20 billion industry. During the past 40 years, the
company had earned a reputation for producing the
best seafood, and Neptune did everything it could to preserve
that premium image among customers.
The company reached its consumers, who were extremely
demanding, through various channels. Neptune generated
about 30% of its revenues by selling frozen and processed fish
products to U.S. grocery chains, like Shaw's
Supermarkets, and organic food retailers, like Whole Foods
Market, all along the eastern seaboard and in parts of the
Midwest.
http://web.ebscohost.com.libproxy.lib.csusb.edu/ehost/detail?vi
d=4&hid=119&sid=a4bbbf72-e94d-45f9-9d40-
a425440489bc%40sessionmgr13&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3Qtb
Gl2ZQ%3d%3d#toc
The Neptune's Gold line of seafood products, manufactured in
two sophisticated plants near Cedar Key, Florida, and
Norfolk, Virginia, dominated most segments in terms of quality,
and therefore sold at premiums compared with other

brands. For example, Neptune's Gold canned salmon, tuna,
sardines, mackerel, herring, and pilchard enjoyed a 30%
higher price point, on average, than other brands; and Neptune's
(Sold lump crabmeat, anchovies, clams, lobster
meat, mussels, oysters, and shrimp commanded a 25% premium
over rival products.
That wasn't the company's biggest market, though. Neptune had
emerged as the supplier of choice to the best
restaurants within 250 miles of its Fort Lauderdale headquarters
as well as to the biggest cruise lines, which together
accounted for a third of the company's sales. Another 33% came
from wholesalers that distributed the company's
products to restaurants all over the United States. In fact, sushi
bars from New York to Los Angeles increasingly
bought Neptune's frozen fish instead of buying fresh fish and
freezing it themselves. And, befitting the humble
origins of founder John Renser, approximately 4% of Neptune's
sales came from a fish market outside Fort
Lauderdale that the company owned and operated.
It wasn't easy to live up to the tagline "The Best Seafood on the
Water Planet." Dogged by competition - especially
from China, Peru, Chile, and Japan-as well as tough fishing
laws, Neptune invested heavily to stay ahead of rivals.

Stanley Renser, the company's largest shareholder, had recently
expanded the firm's equity base, although doing so
had shrunk his share to 10%. The capital infusion allowed
Neptune to invest $9 million in six freezer trawlers of the
kind Hargrove had visited. Those ships' autopilot mechanisms
guided them to the best fishing grounds, manipulated
fishing gear, landed catches, and reported data to shore. Other
systems, along with new fishing equipment, ensured
that only mature fish were caught and that the nets were not
overfilled, thus reducing damage to the haul. As a
result, Neptune increasingly landed only top-quality catches.
What's more, the freezer trawlers used a new technology to
superfreeze fish to -70°F (instead of the usual -10°F or -
23°F) within four hours of capture. The fish would freeze so
quickly with this method that ice crystals couldn't form in
them or on them. That allowed the fish to retain their original
flavor, texture, and color; and when cooked, they
tasted like they were fresh out of the water. Moreover, by
packing the catch in snow made from dry ice and
surrounding it with liquid nitrogen, the process increased shelf
life by 50%. No wonder the gourmet magazine
Connoisseur's Choice had rated Neptune's products foremost in
quality for the tenth year in a row.

Against the Current
To Hargrove, the company's premium image, investments in
new technologies, and obsession with quality made any
price cut--let alone the notion of chopping prices in half-
unthinkable. But Sanchez refused to back down." I'm not
kidding, Jim. It's pretty clear that we have a big inventory
problem. We have to slash prices to get rid of those
excess stocks.”
Hargrove knew exactly what Sanchez was talking about. In the
past three months, Neptune's finished goods
inventory had shot up to 60 days' supply--twice the normal level
and three times what ill had been a year ago. Like
many of his colleagues, Hargrove considered the inventory
pileup a temporary phenomenon; stocks had risen
because the company had added ships to the fleet and could
process catches more efficiently than before. Surely, if
Neptune sold some old ships and stuck to its plan of launching
ready-to-eat, fish-based meals, its inventory would
soon fall to normal levels.
Sanchez and her sales team, however, were convinced that they
faced a more enduring situation. "I told you this a
month ago, Jim, and I'll say it again. The new laws have
reduced our access to fish near the coast and forced us to
go farther out to sea. Because the fishing grounds are richer

there, and because we're using new technologies, our
catches have grown bigger on average. That's why, even in the
past four weeks when we've seen demand reach an
all-time high, our inventory has continued to grow.”
"First of all, it makes no sense to me to cut prices when demand
is rising,” Hargrove said, exasperatedly. "Besides,
think about how customers would perceive a large price cut. If
you slash prices by 50%, people will think there's
something wrong with the fish-like it's rotten or full of
mercury! It would destroy our premium image and
permanently erode our brand equity.”
Gl2ZQ%3d%3d#toc
Sanchez shook her head. "Customers recognize that we sell a
perishable product and that the supply of fish
fluctuates from day to day. They expect prices to vary. The
prices of fruits, vegetables, and flowers change all the
time, don't they? A few years ago, coffee bean prices
plummeted when growers realized they'd be better off selling
inventories than watching the beans rot. Since then, coffee
prices have gone up again. No one seems to object when

the prices of chicken, beef, or pork rise and fall because of
changes in the marketplace. I'm not willing to leave
money on the table by refusing to react to supply-and-demand
fluctuations.”
"But why do you want to cut prices so drastically? Why not just
offer customers a 10% discount? I can see us doing
that in the winter, when sales are slow, anyway" Hargrove
pointed out.
Sanchez shook her head again. "It won't work, Jim. Our
warehouses are so full that it's going to take a lot more than
that to make a difference. And with $9 million tied up in the
new ships, you know we won't be keeping them in
harbor. Our inventories are going to keep growing unless we do
something radical.”
"Selling product at a loss is radical, all right," Hargrove
muttered grimly. On many of its products, Neptune wasn't
making enough profit after manufacturing costs to sustain a
deep price cut.
In fact, the company's margins had already shrunk by 10% in
the past year because of rising costs and growing
competition.
"You're talking about sunk costs," Sanchez shot back. "Selling
product at a loss to generate some revenue is better
than throwing it away. What I'm proposing, though--”

"Have you considered how our competitors will react?"
Hargrove cut in. "If we do this, some of them are bound to
retaliate with even deeper price cuts, and then we'll be in a
price war none of us can afford--Neptune least of all,
given our cost structure.”
Sanchez held up a hand. "Of course, of course. But you're
assuming it says 'Neptune's Gold' on the discounted
product. I actually envision a new brand.”
Hargrove exploded. "You don't create a new brand to deal with
a temporary increase in supply! Besides, you won't
fool anybody. Everyone will know who's responsible for
flooding the market and eroding margins.”
It was clear to Sanchez that she wasn't making much headway
with Hargrove. "Look, Jim, this really isn't the place
for this discussion, and perhaps I'm not being as clear as I
should be. I want to put this issue on the MOC's agenda
for Friday." The Marketing and Operations Council, which
comprised Neptune's top executives, met twice per month.
"Fine, as long as Stanley is at the meeting, too. I'll go up on
deck and talk to him tight away," said Hargrove, his
seasickness all but forgotten. "The sooner you stop thinking
about a price cut, the better.”
Swimming with the Sharks
As the week progressed, word spread about the solution that

Sanchez had proposed to tackle Neptune's inventory
problem. Both Hargrove and Sanchez were drawn into lively
debates with their colleagues, and they soon realized
that whether people were in favor of price cuts or against them,
everyone had an opinion on the subject.
A day before the MOC meeting, Sanchez received an
unexpected visitor. It was Nelson Stowe, the company's legal
counsel and a longtime confidant of the Renser family, hovering
at her door. "Ah, Rita. Got a minute?" Stowe asked
in his mild-mannered fashion.
Realizing that this was no ordinary visit--Stowe had never
called on her before--Sanchez quickly invited him into her
office. After they had settled in, Stowe got slowly to the point.
"I've been hearing that you want to launch a mass-
market brand. Interesting! You know, before we opened the fish
market, John Renser wanted to do something
similar. He wanted to sell some of our fish at a low price so that
more people would eat seafood. But that was a long
time ago.
"I'm sure you're thinking through the implications of your
strategy," he continued, "but one issue concerns me. Have
you thought about how the Association will react?”
Stowe was referring to the powerful U.S. Association of

Seafood Processors and Distributors, whose members, such
as Neptune, accounted for 80% of America's seafood
production. The ASPD influenced American and global policies
related to the fishing industry and imposed quality standards on
members. It also conducted surveys of wholesale
and retail seafood prices and, twice a year, published
benchmark prices that influenced the pricing policies of seafood
producers and distributors.
Gl2ZQ%3d%3d#toc
"I don't know, Nelson," Sanchez sighed. "But I doubt that the
Association can do anything.”
"I wouldn't be so sure," said Stowe. "At the prices you're
suggesting, you're likely to endanger our ASPD Gold Seal of
Approval. We're the only company that has the seal on every
product we sell. But the Association could easily change
that.”
"No!" Sanchez cried out. "It can't! Regardless of the prices we
charge, our products will still meet the ASPD's quality
standards. Besides, we're just selling the same fish under a
different brand.”

"Don't fool yourself, Rita. The Association has a great deal of
discretion about who gets the Gold Seal and who
doesn't. If it believes that our pricing strategy will cost the
fishing industry a lot of money, it might withhold the seal
on our low-end products- for starters. I'd like us to remember
that the Association isn't going to stand by idly while
we disrupt the industry," Stowe warned as he got up to leave.
"Keep me posted, will you?”
A Pretty Kettle of Fish
At 8 AM on Friday, Sanchez walked into the conference room
on Renser's heels. "How was Newfoundland?" she
asked.
"Lousy," croaked Renser, who had returned late the previous
night after delivering the keynote address at the
Canadian Fish Producers' annual conference. "I caught a cold,"
he complained. "Happens every time I fly
commercial.”
"At least riding in planes doesn't make you feel nauseated,"
Hargrove quipped as he joined them. "That's more than I
can say for tiding in boats.”
Once everyone had settled down, Hargrove got the meeting
under way. "We have several routine items on the
agenda," he began. "But Rita and I have added a topic we think
is important, so I suggest we move to that first."

When everyone nodded in agreement, Sanchez and Hargrove ran
through the issues they had discussed on the
yacht.
As they concluded their summaries, Bernard Germain,
Neptune's COO, spoke up. "Do we know which of our rivals
are considering price cuts? We aren't the only company facing
overcapacity. It would be naive of us to believe that
all our competitors will hold prices for the industry's good.”
"I can't believe it!" Hargrove burst out. "You're in favor of
price cuts?”
"I don't know yet, Jim. I'm trying to understand why Rita's
suggestion that we introduce a low-priced seafood brand
is so off-the-wall. Why can't we use a new brand to appeal to
value-minded customers? Seems to me that we have
the product; we can distribute it using our existing channels;
and we can achieve a new positioning through
packaging, advertising, and pricing. I don't see the difference
between this strategy and what companies like Kellogg
do with their private-label businesses. In fact, if we don't want
to launch a second brand, we could think about
supplying retailers with private-label products.”
"I'm not suggesting that we get into the private-label business,"
Sanchez was quick to reply. "That can pose

problems, as many consumer goods manufacturers have
discovered. I feel we should create a mass-market brand
called, say, Neptune's Silver.”
"That's terrible!" snapped Hargrove. "By calling it Neptune's
Silver, you're positioning the cheap product right next to
Neptune's Gold in the eyes of consumers. Then they'll be more
likely to try it and, once they do, they'll realize there's
no difference in quality. We'll end up cannibalizing our own
sales. Why would any company in a high-end segment do
something so crazy?”
"I guess you don't remember what transpired in the wine
industry a couple of years ago," responded Pat Gilman, the
head of Neptune's institutional business, whose taste for high-
end products was well known. "A California vintner,
Bronco Wines, did something exactly that 'crazy.' It was the
same kind of situation: a glut of grapes, huge
inventories. They slapped a new brand name on the stuff and
sold it through Trader Joe's for $1.99 a bottle. It's
called Charles Shaw, but people nicknamed it Two-Buck
Chuck.”
"Not only do I know about it, but I've also tried it," Sandy
McKain, head of the company's consumer business, piped
in. "I can tell you, it's worth every penny. But Pat, I don't think
the scenario is exactly the same. Even in Bordeaux, a

lot of winemakers offer a premium wine and several cheaper
wines, but they use grapes of different qualities to
make the different grades. Would we be doing that?”
Gl2ZQ%3d%3d#toc
"In Bronco's case, it was the same grapes they'd been using for
higher-priced wines," Gilman said. "As for Jim's
point, I'm sure they had some customers migrate to the cheaper
stuff. But think about the upside. In the United
States, 88% of wine sold is consumed by 12% of the population-
-”
"Hey, Pat" Hargrove called out. "How much of that do you
personally account for?”
Gilman joined in the laughter before continuing: "The point is,
more people will opt for a bottle of wine with dinner if
they can get a passable one on the cheap. Wine sales have
grown at the expense of other beverages in recent years.
The same thing could happen to us. Even with people eating
healthier things, seafood sales lag behind those of beef,
chicken, and pork. The way I see it, this isn't about reducing
inventory. It's about introducing our products to a

bigger market: the more budget-conscious consumer. And if it's
like wine, the educated consumer will then trade up
to Neptune's Gold.”
A furious discussion followed about how hard it would be for
Neptune to win shelf space in supermarkets for a new
brand, particularly for a low-priced product that might go head-
to-head with the grocers' own private-label offerings.
The group was also divided about whether it should sell a
second brand through the same channels or through
different ones. Germain wondered aloud whether Neptune
should target new geographic markets--like South America
and Central America--with a low-priced offering.
"Hang on!" exclaimed a clearly frustrated Hargrove. "When we
started, weren't we debating whether it made sense
to launch a new brand to deal with a temporary inventory
problem? That would mean we'd kill it once we solved that
problem. I--”
"If customers like our new brand, it might constitute a better
growth strategy," Sanchez interrupted. "The way I look
at it, the second brand could prove to be a win-win
proposition.”
"I don't know if it's as simple as that," Germain said slowly.
"Every luxury company I know of--Gucci, Mercedes-Benz,

BMW, Tiffany, even Hyatt--has struggled to go mass without
destroying its premium image. For that matter, when
fashion designers like Isaac Mizrahi create an affordable line
for a retailer like Target, I wonder if that adds to the
brand's luster or tarnishes it?”
Renser, who had been quiet until then, cleared his scratchy
throat. His colleagues were starting to rehash territory
they had already covered, and instead of sharpening their
arguments, they seemed to be obfuscating them. On one
hand, they appeared to agree that it would be important to keep
the two brands separate. On the other hand, they
were talking about migrating customers from the low-end brand
to the high-end brand, which would mean linking
the two. Renser knew that the group was waiting to hear where
he stood, but he didn't yet know what to say. How
long could he leave them hanging--along with his company's
fortunes--between the devil and the deep blue sea?
Should Neptune launch a mass-market brand?
GUIDELINES FOR WRITING A CASE STUDY

Please make certain that your case study analysis is no longer
than 600 words.
When you write a case study, it is important not summarize the
case. Please resist
this temptation. I would like you to follow the following outline
for your case
studies:
1) Please identify the central issue(s) or problem(s) in the case
study;
2) Please explain what the source of the central issue(s) or
problem(s) is. Why
is the situation the way it is?
3) Please explain what the implications and/or ramifications of
the situation
are;
4) Please make a recommendation or endorsement. (It is
essential that your
recommendation be supported by your analysis in step #3).
Diversification Analysis

Diversification analysis is a technique that helps a firm search
for growth opportunities from
among current and new markets as well as current and new
products. For any market, there is
both a current product (what the firm now sells) and a new
product (what the firm might sell in
the future). And for any product there is both a current market
(the firm's existing customers) and
a new market (the firm's potential customers). As Ben & Jerry's
seeks to increase sales revenues,
it considers all four market-product strategies shown in Figure:
of current products in current
markets, such as selling more Ben & Jerry's Bonnaroo Buzz Fair
Trade–sourced ice cream
to U.S. consumers. There is no change in either the basic
product line or the markets served.
Increased sales are generated by selling either more ice cream
(through better promotion or
distribution) or the same amount of ice cream at a higher price
to its current customers.

ting strategy to sell current
products to new markets. For
Ben & Jerry's, Brazil is an attractive new market. There is good
news and bad news for this
strategy: As household incomes of Brazilians increase,
consumers can buy more ice cream;
however, the Ben & Jerry's brand may be unknown to Brazilian
consumers.
products to current markets.
Ben & Jerry's could leverage its brand by selling children's
clothing in the United States.
This strategy is risky because Americans may not see the
company's expertise in ice cream
as extending to children's clothing.
products and selling them in new
markets. This is a potentially high-risk strategy for Ben &
Jerry's if it decides to try to sell
Ben & Jerry's branded clothing in Brazil. Why? Because the
firm has neither previous
production nor marketing experience from which to draw in
marketing clothing to Brazilian

consumers.
Figure: Four market-product strategies: alternative ways to
expand sales revenues for Ben & Jerry’s
using diversification analysis.

Running head B & G FOODS (BGS) COMPANY 1B & G FOODS (BGS) C.docx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Running head B & G FOODS (BGS) COMPANY 1B & G FOODS (BGS) C.docx

Similar to Running head B & G FOODS (BGS) COMPANY 1B & G FOODS (BGS) C.docx (20)

More from healdkathaleen

More from healdkathaleen (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Running head B & G FOODS (BGS) COMPANY 1B & G FOODS (BGS) C.docx