SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Download to read offline
Progress Report                                                                             ELEMENTARY
                                                                                                                          2008-09
                                                                                                                                                               This Progress Report is for:




                A
Progress                                                                                                                                                       SCHOOL                P.S. 160 William T. Sampson
Report                       What does this grade mean?                                How did this school perform?                                                                  (20K160)
Grade                                                                                                                                                          PRINCIPAL             Margaret Russo
                             Schools are assigned letter grades based on               ● This school's overall score for 2008-09 is 79                         ENROLLMENT            788
                             their overall Progress Report score. Schools              ● This score places the School in the 43 percentile of                  SCHOOL TYPE           ELEMENTARY
                             that get As and Bs are eligible for rewards.                all Elementary schools Citywide–i.e., 43 percent of                   PEER INDEX            40.24
                             Schools that get Ds and Fs, or 3 Cs in a row,               those schools scored lower than this school
                             face consequences, including change in school
                             leadership or school closure.



Category                     Calculated Score                                       Category Grade
                                                                                                                                                               In This Report:
                                                                                                                                                               Each school's Progress Report (1) measures student year-
School                                                                                                                                                         to-year progress, (2) compares the school to peer schools
Environment                    10.2 out of 15                                                  A           How scores translate to grades:                     and (3) rewards success in moving all children forward,
                                                           0   15                                                                                              especially children with the greatest needs. The Progress
                                                                                                           ● Schools receive letter grades based               Report measures four areas:
                                                                                                             on their overall score
Student                                                                                                                                                        School Environment
Performance                    19.0 out of 25                                                  A           ● Schools with an overall score
                                                                                                             between 68.0-100 receive a                        uses parent, teacher and secondary student surveys and
                                                           0        25                                       letter grade of A                                 other data to measure necessary conditions for learning:
                                                                                                                                                               attendance, academic expectations, communication,
                                                                                                           ● 87% of schools earned an A in 2008-09             engagement and safety and respect.
Student
Progress                       46.8 out of 60                                                  A                                                               Student Performance
                                                           0               60                              Elementary Table – Overall Grades                   measures student skill levels in English Language Arts and
                                                                                                                                                               Math.
                                                                                                           Grade      Score range           City summary
Additional                                                                                                                                                     Student Progress
                                                                                                              A          68.0-100           87.2% of schools   measures average student improvement from last year to
Credit                           3.0 (15 max)                                                                 B          54-67.9            10.8% of schools   this year in English Language Arts and Math.
                                                                                                              C          43.0-53.9          1.4% of schools    Closing the Achievement Gap
                                                                                                              D          33.0-42.9          0.3% of schools    gives schools additional credit for exemplary gains among
Overall                                                                                                                                                        high-need students.
Score                          79.0 out of 100                                                 A              F          0-32.9             0.3% of schools
                                                           0                             100                                                                   The back page provides specific information about how the
                                                                                                                                                               school performed in each of these areas.


Quality Review Score                                                     State Accountability Status
This school's 2007-08 Quality Review score is:                           Based on its 2008-09 performance, this school is:
                   Well Developed                                                             In Good Standing
To see this school's Quality Review report, find the                     This status is determined by the New York State Department
school's Web site at http://schools.nyc.gov/, click                      of Education under the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. It is
'Statistics' and scroll down to Quality Review Report.                   separate from the school's Progress Report Grade.




    Additional Information


    Closing the Achievement Gap                                                                      Peer Schools
    Schools earn additional credit when their high-need students make                                Each school's performance is compared to the performance of schools in its peer group.
    exemplary gains. These gains are based on the percentage of high-need                            Peer schools are those New York City public schools with a student population most like this
    students who improve by at least one-half of a proficiency level in English                      school's population. Each school has up to 40 peer schools.
    Language Arts or Math (e.g., student improves from 2.25 to 2.75 in ELA, or
    3.20 to 3.70 in Math).                                                                           For Elementary and K-8 Schools, peer schools are determined based on the percentage
                                                                                                     of students at each school that are English Language Learners, Special Education,
    This component can only improve a school's Progress Report grade. It cannot                      Black/Hispanic and Title I eligible.
    lower a school's grade.
                                                                                                     For Middle Schools, peer schools are determined based on the average ELA and Math
                                                                                                     proficiency levels of the school's students before they entered Middle School.

                 Exemplary                                                                           The peer schools for P.S. 160 William T. Sampson are:
                 Proficiency
    Credit       Gains                Student Group                                                  DBN      School Name                                      DBN      School Name
                                      English Language Arts                                          29Q033 P.S. 033 Edward M. Funk                            02M001 P.S. 001 Alfred E. Smith
                                                                                                     24Q091 P.S. 091 Richard Arkwright                         27Q065 P.S. 65 - The Raymond York Elementary School
                   30.0%              English Language Learners                                      25Q214 P.S. 214 Cadwallader Colden                        04M497 Central Park East I
                                                                                                     28Q117   P.S. 117 J. Keld / Briarwood School              24Q088   P.S. 088 Seneca
     +0.75         43.8%              Special Education Students
                                                                                                     31R046   P.S. 046 Albert V. Maniscalco                    21K212   P.S. 212 Lady Deborah Moody
                      -               Hispanic Students in the Lowest Third Citywide                 25Q020   P.S. 020 John Bowne                              08X304   P.S. 304 Early Childhood School
                                                                                                     28Q055   P.S. 055 Maure                                   30Q085   P.S. 085 Judge Charles Vallone
                      -               Black Students in the Lowest Third Citywide                    25Q165   P.S. 165 Edith K. Bergtraum                      30Q150   P.S. 150 Queens

     +0.75         48.0%              Other Students in the Lowest Third Citywide                    24Q071   P.S. 071 Forest                                  24Q012   P.S. 012 James B. Colgate
                                                                                                     28Q161   P.S. 161 Arthur Ashe School                      30Q084   P.S. 084 Steinway
                                      Mathematics                                                    30Q011   P.S. 011 Kathryn Phelan                          03M163   P.S. 163 Alfred E. Smith
                                                                                                     08X014   P.S. X014 Senator John Calandra                  27Q064   P.S. 064 Joseph P. Addabbo
                   18.1%              English Language Learners                                      28Q121   P.S. 121 Queens                                  28Q206   P.S. 206 Horace Harding
                                                                                                     02M002   P.S. 002 Meyer London                            27Q063   P.S. 063 Old South
                   25.0%              Special Education Students
                                                                                                     30Q002   P.S. 002 Alfred Zimberg                          22K197   P.S. 197 Brooklyn
                      -               Hispanic Students in the Lowest Third Citywide                 25Q029   P.S. 029 Queens                                  31R011   P.S. 11 Thomas Dongan School
                                                                                                     14K031   P.S. 031 Samuel F. Dupont                        27Q100   P.S. 100 Glen Morris
                      -               Black Students in the Lowest Third Citywide                    30Q078   P.S. 078                                         84K593   Excellence Charter School of Bedford Stuyvesant

         +1.5      42.3%              Other Students in the Lowest Third Citywide                    14K110   P.S. 110 The Monitor                             31R013   P.S. 013 M. L. Lindenmeyer
                                                                                                     30Q070   P.S. 070 Queens                                  01M110   P.S. 110 Florence Nightingale
    (-) indicates less than 15 students in this category

    The Progress Report is a key component of Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg's and Chancellor Joel I. Klein's Children First reforms. The Progress Report is designed to assist
    administrators, principals and teachers in accelerating the learning of all students. The Progress Report also enables students, parents and the public to hold the NYC Department
    of Education and its schools accountable for student achievement and improvement and for ensuring a high quality education for every student in NYC's public schools. If you have
    any questions or comments about the Progress Report, please visit http://schools.nyc.gov/Accountability/SchoolReports/ProgressReports/ or send us an email at
    pr_support@schools.nyc.gov.
Each school's Progress Report (1) measures
                                                                                              SCHOOL P.S. 160 William T. Sampson
   Results by Category                                                                       PRINCIPAL Margaret Russo



   HOW TO INTERPRET THIS CHART
   A school is evaluated by asking how far its score in each category has                               0%         25%   50%       75%    100%     In this example, the school's attendance is 95%. This is
   moved along the range of scores for all schools. These charts show that                              Min                                Max     75% of the way from the lowest attendance at any school
   movement as a percentage. In the example to the right, the school's score    Attendance                                                         (80%) to the highest attendance (100%).
   is 75% of the way from the lowest to the highest score in the City.              95%        75.0%
                                                                                                        80.0%                            100.0%    Below, the green charts on the left compare the school to
   If a school performs at the top end of the range, the bar will be fully                                                                         its peer group. The blue charts on the right compare the
   shaded. If a school performs at the low end of the range, the bar will not                                                                      school to schools Citywide. Peer scores count three times
   be shaded. If a school performs in the middle of the range, half the bar                                                                        as much as City scores. Peer and City ranges are based on
   will be shaded                                                                                                                                  the outcomes of schools from 2005-08.




School Environment                                                               Your
                                                                                School's
                                                                                                        0%
                                                                                                        Peer Min
                                                                                                                   25%   50%       75%    100%
                                                                                                                                     Peer Max
                                                                                                                                                               0%
                                                                                                                                                               City Min
                                                                                                                                                                          25%      50%         75%    100%
                                                                                                                                                                                                 City Max     Number of
Comprises 15% of the Overall Score                                               Score       Your School Relative to Peer Horizon:                 Your School Relative to City Horizon:                       students
This Year's Score:             Survey Scores (10 points)
10.2 out of 15



 A
                                   Academic Expectations:                         7.8          54.5%                                                  57.7%
                                                                                                        6.6                                8.8                 6.3                                     8.9



                                   Communication:                                 6.8          40.7%                                                  42.3%
                                                                                                        5.7                                8.4                 5.7                                     8.3



                                   Engagement:                                    7.0          55.2%                                                  56.3%
                                                                                                        5.4                                8.3                 5.2                                     8.4



                                   Safety and Respect:                            8.1          55.0%                                                  62.1%
                                                                                                        7.0                                9.0                 6.3                                     9.2



                               Attendance (5 points)                             96.4%         102.1%                                                 94.0%
                                                                                                        91.5%                            96.3%                 88.5%                                 96.9%




Student Performance                                                              Your
                                                                                School's
                                                                                                        0%
                                                                                                        Peer Min
                                                                                                                   25%   50%       75%    100%
                                                                                                                                     Peer Max
                                                                                                                                                               0%
                                                                                                                                                               City Min
                                                                                                                                                                          25%      50%         75%    100%
                                                                                                                                                                                                 City Max

Comprises 25% of the Overall Score                                               Score       Your School Relative to Peer Horizon:                 Your School Relative to City Horizon:
This Year's Score:             English Language Arts
19 out of 25



 A
                                   Percentage of Students                        77.6%         71.2%                                                  75.5%                                                      339
                                   at Proficiency (Level 3 or 4):                                       49.9%                            88.8%                 25.8%                                 94.4%



                                   Median Student Proficiency (1.00-4.50):        3.27         64.4%                                                  67.7%                                                      339
                                                                                                        2.98                              3.43                 2.60                                   3.59


                               Mathematics


                                   Percentage of Students                        96.3%         87.9%                                                  92.1%                                                      353
                                   at Proficiency (Level 3 or 4):                                       69.5%                            100.0%                53.2%                                 100.0%



                                   Median Student Proficiency (1.00-4.50):        3.90         76.1%                                                  82.4%                                                      353
                                                                                                        3.20                              4.12                 2.82                                   4.13




Student Progress                                                                 Your
                                                                                School's
                                                                                                        0%
                                                                                                        Peer Min
                                                                                                                   25%   50%       75%    100%
                                                                                                                                     Peer Max
                                                                                                                                                               0%
                                                                                                                                                               City Min
                                                                                                                                                                          25%      50%         75%    100%
                                                                                                                                                                                                 City Max

Comprises 60% of the Overall Score                                               Score       Your School Relative to Peer Horizon:                 Your School Relative to City Horizon:
This Year's Score:             English Language Arts
46.8 out of 60



 A
                                   Percentage of Students Making                 67.9%         86.5%                                                  83.4%                                                      324
                                   at Least 1 Year of Progress                                          48.0%                            71.0%                 44.8%                                 72.5%



                                   Percentage of Students in School's            85.5%         71.1%                                                  72.2%                                                      76
                                   Lowest 1/3 Students Making at Least                                  63.8%                            94.3%                 60.0%                                 95.3%
                                   1 Year of Progress

                                   Average Change in Student Proficiency          0.39         65.4%                                                  67.6%                                                      94
                                   for Level 1 and Level 2 Students                                     0.22                              0.48                 0.16                                   0.50



                                   Average Change in Student Proficiency          0.07         95.2%                                                  96.7%                                                      230
                                   for Level 3 and Level 4 Students                                     (0.13)                            0.08                 (0.22)                                 0.08


                               Mathematics


                                   Percentage of Students Making                 78.1%         81.8%                                                  90.9%                                                      344
                                   at Least 1 Year of Progress                                          49.7%                            84.4%                 41.1%                                 81.8%



                                   Percentage of Students in School's            79.8%         71.5%                                                  78.1%                                                      84
                                   Lowest 1/3 Students Making at Least                                  50.0%                            91.7%                 46.0%                                 89.3%
                                   1 Year of Progress

                                   Average Change in Student Proficiency          0.63         100.0%                                                107.5%                                                      21
                                   for Level 1 and Level 2 Students                                     0.12                              0.63                 0.06                                   0.59



                                   Average Change in Student Proficiency          0.04         63.3%                                                  73.5%                                                      323
                                   for Level 3 and Level 4 Students                                     (0.15)                            0.15                 (0.21)                                 0.13

More Related Content

What's hot

Jarvis Collegiate Institute Gr 9 - 12 - EQAO School Report
Jarvis Collegiate Institute Gr 9 - 12 - EQAO School ReportJarvis Collegiate Institute Gr 9 - 12 - EQAO School Report
Jarvis Collegiate Institute Gr 9 - 12 - EQAO School ReportEvanSage
 
Brown Junior Public School - EQAO Board Report
Brown Junior Public School - EQAO Board ReportBrown Junior Public School - EQAO Board Report
Brown Junior Public School - EQAO Board ReportEvanSage
 
Cottingham Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School Report
Cottingham Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School ReportCottingham Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School Report
Cottingham Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School ReportEvanSage
 
Smarterbalancedassessments10 12
Smarterbalancedassessments10 12Smarterbalancedassessments10 12
Smarterbalancedassessments10 12hardyrcs
 
Jarvis Collegiate Institute Gr 9 - 12 - EQAO Board Report
Jarvis Collegiate Institute Gr 9 - 12 - EQAO Board ReportJarvis Collegiate Institute Gr 9 - 12 - EQAO Board Report
Jarvis Collegiate Institute Gr 9 - 12 - EQAO Board ReportEvanSage
 
Middle School Report Card 2011-2012
Middle School Report Card 2011-2012Middle School Report Card 2011-2012
Middle School Report Card 2011-2012JD Williamson
 

What's hot (7)

Jarvis Collegiate Institute Gr 9 - 12 - EQAO School Report
Jarvis Collegiate Institute Gr 9 - 12 - EQAO School ReportJarvis Collegiate Institute Gr 9 - 12 - EQAO School Report
Jarvis Collegiate Institute Gr 9 - 12 - EQAO School Report
 
Brown Junior Public School - EQAO Board Report
Brown Junior Public School - EQAO Board ReportBrown Junior Public School - EQAO Board Report
Brown Junior Public School - EQAO Board Report
 
Cottingham Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School Report
Cottingham Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School ReportCottingham Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School Report
Cottingham Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School Report
 
Smarterbalancedassessments10 12
Smarterbalancedassessments10 12Smarterbalancedassessments10 12
Smarterbalancedassessments10 12
 
Jarvis Collegiate Institute Gr 9 - 12 - EQAO Board Report
Jarvis Collegiate Institute Gr 9 - 12 - EQAO Board ReportJarvis Collegiate Institute Gr 9 - 12 - EQAO Board Report
Jarvis Collegiate Institute Gr 9 - 12 - EQAO Board Report
 
Education Indicators
Education IndicatorsEducation Indicators
Education Indicators
 
Middle School Report Card 2011-2012
Middle School Report Card 2011-2012Middle School Report Card 2011-2012
Middle School Report Card 2011-2012
 

Similar to Elementary School Progress Report 2008-09

Third READ Conference, Eschborn, Germany
Third READ Conference, Eschborn, GermanyThird READ Conference, Eschborn, Germany
Third READ Conference, Eschborn, GermanyJimmy Keng
 
Deer Park Junior and Senior Public School Gr JK - 8 - EQAO School Report
Deer Park Junior and Senior Public School Gr JK - 8 - EQAO School ReportDeer Park Junior and Senior Public School Gr JK - 8 - EQAO School Report
Deer Park Junior and Senior Public School Gr JK - 8 - EQAO School ReportEvanSage
 
Whitney Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School Report
Whitney Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School ReportWhitney Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School Report
Whitney Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School ReportEvanSage
 
Brown Junior Public School - EQAO School Report
Brown Junior Public School - EQAO School ReportBrown Junior Public School - EQAO School Report
Brown Junior Public School - EQAO School ReportEvanSage
 
Wyoming Accountability in Education Act - 1/16/14 Presentation
Wyoming Accountability in Education Act - 1/16/14 PresentationWyoming Accountability in Education Act - 1/16/14 Presentation
Wyoming Accountability in Education Act - 1/16/14 PresentationJay Harnack
 
Encuesta de Calidad Educativa en Chiapas (ECECH) English
Encuesta de Calidad Educativa en Chiapas (ECECH) EnglishEncuesta de Calidad Educativa en Chiapas (ECECH) English
Encuesta de Calidad Educativa en Chiapas (ECECH) EnglishIDEAfundacion
 
Assessment and accountability during COVID-19
Assessment and accountability during COVID-19Assessment and accountability during COVID-19
Assessment and accountability during COVID-19Analisa Sorrells
 
The Grove Newsletter January 2011
The Grove Newsletter January 2011The Grove Newsletter January 2011
The Grove Newsletter January 2011Lisa_McVey
 
Rosedale Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School Report
Rosedale Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School ReportRosedale Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School Report
Rosedale Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School ReportEvanSage
 
Making the Grade
Making the GradeMaking the Grade
Making the GradeMebane Rash
 
Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...
Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...
Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...National Partnership for Educational Access
 
Explain an SPF Report
Explain an SPF ReportExplain an SPF Report
Explain an SPF Reportjordanwb
 

Similar to Elementary School Progress Report 2008-09 (17)

Third READ Conference, Eschborn, Germany
Third READ Conference, Eschborn, GermanyThird READ Conference, Eschborn, Germany
Third READ Conference, Eschborn, Germany
 
Deer Park Junior and Senior Public School Gr JK - 8 - EQAO School Report
Deer Park Junior and Senior Public School Gr JK - 8 - EQAO School ReportDeer Park Junior and Senior Public School Gr JK - 8 - EQAO School Report
Deer Park Junior and Senior Public School Gr JK - 8 - EQAO School Report
 
Whitney Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School Report
Whitney Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School ReportWhitney Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School Report
Whitney Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School Report
 
Brown Junior Public School - EQAO School Report
Brown Junior Public School - EQAO School ReportBrown Junior Public School - EQAO School Report
Brown Junior Public School - EQAO School Report
 
Wyoming Accountability in Education Act - 1/16/14 Presentation
Wyoming Accountability in Education Act - 1/16/14 PresentationWyoming Accountability in Education Act - 1/16/14 Presentation
Wyoming Accountability in Education Act - 1/16/14 Presentation
 
Encuesta de Calidad Educativa en Chiapas (ECECH) English
Encuesta de Calidad Educativa en Chiapas (ECECH) EnglishEncuesta de Calidad Educativa en Chiapas (ECECH) English
Encuesta de Calidad Educativa en Chiapas (ECECH) English
 
Assessment and accountability during COVID-19
Assessment and accountability during COVID-19Assessment and accountability during COVID-19
Assessment and accountability during COVID-19
 
The Grove Newsletter January 2011
The Grove Newsletter January 2011The Grove Newsletter January 2011
The Grove Newsletter January 2011
 
Rosedale Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School Report
Rosedale Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School ReportRosedale Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School Report
Rosedale Junior Public School Gr JK - 6 - EQAO School Report
 
Making the Grade
Making the GradeMaking the Grade
Making the Grade
 
E valuate brochure
E valuate brochureE valuate brochure
E valuate brochure
 
Gateways ppt
Gateways pptGateways ppt
Gateways ppt
 
Warner Poster
Warner PosterWarner Poster
Warner Poster
 
SRC-DATA.pptx
SRC-DATA.pptxSRC-DATA.pptx
SRC-DATA.pptx
 
Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...
Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...
Readiness Matters: The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and...
 
Developing and Assessing Teacher Effectiveness
Developing and Assessing Teacher EffectivenessDeveloping and Assessing Teacher Effectiveness
Developing and Assessing Teacher Effectiveness
 
Explain an SPF Report
Explain an SPF ReportExplain an SPF Report
Explain an SPF Report
 

Recently uploaded

Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionMastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionSafetyChain Software
 
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17Celine George
 
internship ppt on smartinternz platform as salesforce developer
internship ppt on smartinternz platform as salesforce developerinternship ppt on smartinternz platform as salesforce developer
internship ppt on smartinternz platform as salesforce developerunnathinaik
 
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxIntroduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxpboyjonauth
 
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Sapana Sha
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTiammrhaywood
 
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting DataJhengPantaleon
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityGeoBlogs
 
Pharmacognosy Flower 3. Compositae 2023.pdf
Pharmacognosy Flower 3. Compositae 2023.pdfPharmacognosy Flower 3. Compositae 2023.pdf
Pharmacognosy Flower 3. Compositae 2023.pdfMahmoud M. Sallam
 
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxCARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxGaneshChakor2
 
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon ACrayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon AUnboundStockton
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxNirmalaLoungPoorunde1
 
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17Celine George
 
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptxEPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptxRaymartEstabillo3
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfsanyamsingh5019
 
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️9953056974 Low Rate Call Girls In Saket, Delhi NCR
 
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17Celine George
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionMastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
 
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini Delhi NCR
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini  Delhi NCR9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini  Delhi NCR
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini Delhi NCR
 
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdfTataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
 
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17
 
internship ppt on smartinternz platform as salesforce developer
internship ppt on smartinternz platform as salesforce developerinternship ppt on smartinternz platform as salesforce developer
internship ppt on smartinternz platform as salesforce developer
 
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxIntroduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
 
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
 
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
Pharmacognosy Flower 3. Compositae 2023.pdf
Pharmacognosy Flower 3. Compositae 2023.pdfPharmacognosy Flower 3. Compositae 2023.pdf
Pharmacognosy Flower 3. Compositae 2023.pdf
 
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxCARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
 
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon ACrayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
 
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
 
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptxEPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
 
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
 
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
 

Elementary School Progress Report 2008-09

  • 1. Progress Report ELEMENTARY 2008-09 This Progress Report is for: A Progress SCHOOL P.S. 160 William T. Sampson Report What does this grade mean? How did this school perform? (20K160) Grade PRINCIPAL Margaret Russo Schools are assigned letter grades based on ● This school's overall score for 2008-09 is 79 ENROLLMENT 788 their overall Progress Report score. Schools ● This score places the School in the 43 percentile of SCHOOL TYPE ELEMENTARY that get As and Bs are eligible for rewards. all Elementary schools Citywide–i.e., 43 percent of PEER INDEX 40.24 Schools that get Ds and Fs, or 3 Cs in a row, those schools scored lower than this school face consequences, including change in school leadership or school closure. Category Calculated Score Category Grade In This Report: Each school's Progress Report (1) measures student year- School to-year progress, (2) compares the school to peer schools Environment 10.2 out of 15 A How scores translate to grades: and (3) rewards success in moving all children forward, 0 15 especially children with the greatest needs. The Progress ● Schools receive letter grades based Report measures four areas: on their overall score Student School Environment Performance 19.0 out of 25 A ● Schools with an overall score between 68.0-100 receive a uses parent, teacher and secondary student surveys and 0 25 letter grade of A other data to measure necessary conditions for learning: attendance, academic expectations, communication, ● 87% of schools earned an A in 2008-09 engagement and safety and respect. Student Progress 46.8 out of 60 A Student Performance 0 60 Elementary Table – Overall Grades measures student skill levels in English Language Arts and Math. Grade Score range City summary Additional Student Progress A 68.0-100 87.2% of schools measures average student improvement from last year to Credit 3.0 (15 max) B 54-67.9 10.8% of schools this year in English Language Arts and Math. C 43.0-53.9 1.4% of schools Closing the Achievement Gap D 33.0-42.9 0.3% of schools gives schools additional credit for exemplary gains among Overall high-need students. Score 79.0 out of 100 A F 0-32.9 0.3% of schools 0 100 The back page provides specific information about how the school performed in each of these areas. Quality Review Score State Accountability Status This school's 2007-08 Quality Review score is: Based on its 2008-09 performance, this school is: Well Developed In Good Standing To see this school's Quality Review report, find the This status is determined by the New York State Department school's Web site at http://schools.nyc.gov/, click of Education under the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. It is 'Statistics' and scroll down to Quality Review Report. separate from the school's Progress Report Grade. Additional Information Closing the Achievement Gap Peer Schools Schools earn additional credit when their high-need students make Each school's performance is compared to the performance of schools in its peer group. exemplary gains. These gains are based on the percentage of high-need Peer schools are those New York City public schools with a student population most like this students who improve by at least one-half of a proficiency level in English school's population. Each school has up to 40 peer schools. Language Arts or Math (e.g., student improves from 2.25 to 2.75 in ELA, or 3.20 to 3.70 in Math). For Elementary and K-8 Schools, peer schools are determined based on the percentage of students at each school that are English Language Learners, Special Education, This component can only improve a school's Progress Report grade. It cannot Black/Hispanic and Title I eligible. lower a school's grade. For Middle Schools, peer schools are determined based on the average ELA and Math proficiency levels of the school's students before they entered Middle School. Exemplary The peer schools for P.S. 160 William T. Sampson are: Proficiency Credit Gains Student Group DBN School Name DBN School Name English Language Arts 29Q033 P.S. 033 Edward M. Funk 02M001 P.S. 001 Alfred E. Smith 24Q091 P.S. 091 Richard Arkwright 27Q065 P.S. 65 - The Raymond York Elementary School 30.0% English Language Learners 25Q214 P.S. 214 Cadwallader Colden 04M497 Central Park East I 28Q117 P.S. 117 J. Keld / Briarwood School 24Q088 P.S. 088 Seneca +0.75 43.8% Special Education Students 31R046 P.S. 046 Albert V. Maniscalco 21K212 P.S. 212 Lady Deborah Moody - Hispanic Students in the Lowest Third Citywide 25Q020 P.S. 020 John Bowne 08X304 P.S. 304 Early Childhood School 28Q055 P.S. 055 Maure 30Q085 P.S. 085 Judge Charles Vallone - Black Students in the Lowest Third Citywide 25Q165 P.S. 165 Edith K. Bergtraum 30Q150 P.S. 150 Queens +0.75 48.0% Other Students in the Lowest Third Citywide 24Q071 P.S. 071 Forest 24Q012 P.S. 012 James B. Colgate 28Q161 P.S. 161 Arthur Ashe School 30Q084 P.S. 084 Steinway Mathematics 30Q011 P.S. 011 Kathryn Phelan 03M163 P.S. 163 Alfred E. Smith 08X014 P.S. X014 Senator John Calandra 27Q064 P.S. 064 Joseph P. Addabbo 18.1% English Language Learners 28Q121 P.S. 121 Queens 28Q206 P.S. 206 Horace Harding 02M002 P.S. 002 Meyer London 27Q063 P.S. 063 Old South 25.0% Special Education Students 30Q002 P.S. 002 Alfred Zimberg 22K197 P.S. 197 Brooklyn - Hispanic Students in the Lowest Third Citywide 25Q029 P.S. 029 Queens 31R011 P.S. 11 Thomas Dongan School 14K031 P.S. 031 Samuel F. Dupont 27Q100 P.S. 100 Glen Morris - Black Students in the Lowest Third Citywide 30Q078 P.S. 078 84K593 Excellence Charter School of Bedford Stuyvesant +1.5 42.3% Other Students in the Lowest Third Citywide 14K110 P.S. 110 The Monitor 31R013 P.S. 013 M. L. Lindenmeyer 30Q070 P.S. 070 Queens 01M110 P.S. 110 Florence Nightingale (-) indicates less than 15 students in this category The Progress Report is a key component of Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg's and Chancellor Joel I. Klein's Children First reforms. The Progress Report is designed to assist administrators, principals and teachers in accelerating the learning of all students. The Progress Report also enables students, parents and the public to hold the NYC Department of Education and its schools accountable for student achievement and improvement and for ensuring a high quality education for every student in NYC's public schools. If you have any questions or comments about the Progress Report, please visit http://schools.nyc.gov/Accountability/SchoolReports/ProgressReports/ or send us an email at pr_support@schools.nyc.gov.
  • 2. Each school's Progress Report (1) measures SCHOOL P.S. 160 William T. Sampson Results by Category PRINCIPAL Margaret Russo HOW TO INTERPRET THIS CHART A school is evaluated by asking how far its score in each category has 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% In this example, the school's attendance is 95%. This is moved along the range of scores for all schools. These charts show that Min Max 75% of the way from the lowest attendance at any school movement as a percentage. In the example to the right, the school's score Attendance (80%) to the highest attendance (100%). is 75% of the way from the lowest to the highest score in the City. 95% 75.0% 80.0% 100.0% Below, the green charts on the left compare the school to If a school performs at the top end of the range, the bar will be fully its peer group. The blue charts on the right compare the shaded. If a school performs at the low end of the range, the bar will not school to schools Citywide. Peer scores count three times be shaded. If a school performs in the middle of the range, half the bar as much as City scores. Peer and City ranges are based on will be shaded the outcomes of schools from 2005-08. School Environment Your School's 0% Peer Min 25% 50% 75% 100% Peer Max 0% City Min 25% 50% 75% 100% City Max Number of Comprises 15% of the Overall Score Score Your School Relative to Peer Horizon: Your School Relative to City Horizon: students This Year's Score: Survey Scores (10 points) 10.2 out of 15 A Academic Expectations: 7.8 54.5% 57.7% 6.6 8.8 6.3 8.9 Communication: 6.8 40.7% 42.3% 5.7 8.4 5.7 8.3 Engagement: 7.0 55.2% 56.3% 5.4 8.3 5.2 8.4 Safety and Respect: 8.1 55.0% 62.1% 7.0 9.0 6.3 9.2 Attendance (5 points) 96.4% 102.1% 94.0% 91.5% 96.3% 88.5% 96.9% Student Performance Your School's 0% Peer Min 25% 50% 75% 100% Peer Max 0% City Min 25% 50% 75% 100% City Max Comprises 25% of the Overall Score Score Your School Relative to Peer Horizon: Your School Relative to City Horizon: This Year's Score: English Language Arts 19 out of 25 A Percentage of Students 77.6% 71.2% 75.5% 339 at Proficiency (Level 3 or 4): 49.9% 88.8% 25.8% 94.4% Median Student Proficiency (1.00-4.50): 3.27 64.4% 67.7% 339 2.98 3.43 2.60 3.59 Mathematics Percentage of Students 96.3% 87.9% 92.1% 353 at Proficiency (Level 3 or 4): 69.5% 100.0% 53.2% 100.0% Median Student Proficiency (1.00-4.50): 3.90 76.1% 82.4% 353 3.20 4.12 2.82 4.13 Student Progress Your School's 0% Peer Min 25% 50% 75% 100% Peer Max 0% City Min 25% 50% 75% 100% City Max Comprises 60% of the Overall Score Score Your School Relative to Peer Horizon: Your School Relative to City Horizon: This Year's Score: English Language Arts 46.8 out of 60 A Percentage of Students Making 67.9% 86.5% 83.4% 324 at Least 1 Year of Progress 48.0% 71.0% 44.8% 72.5% Percentage of Students in School's 85.5% 71.1% 72.2% 76 Lowest 1/3 Students Making at Least 63.8% 94.3% 60.0% 95.3% 1 Year of Progress Average Change in Student Proficiency 0.39 65.4% 67.6% 94 for Level 1 and Level 2 Students 0.22 0.48 0.16 0.50 Average Change in Student Proficiency 0.07 95.2% 96.7% 230 for Level 3 and Level 4 Students (0.13) 0.08 (0.22) 0.08 Mathematics Percentage of Students Making 78.1% 81.8% 90.9% 344 at Least 1 Year of Progress 49.7% 84.4% 41.1% 81.8% Percentage of Students in School's 79.8% 71.5% 78.1% 84 Lowest 1/3 Students Making at Least 50.0% 91.7% 46.0% 89.3% 1 Year of Progress Average Change in Student Proficiency 0.63 100.0% 107.5% 21 for Level 1 and Level 2 Students 0.12 0.63 0.06 0.59 Average Change in Student Proficiency 0.04 63.3% 73.5% 323 for Level 3 and Level 4 Students (0.15) 0.15 (0.21) 0.13