U.S. Military Regime And Its Policies

U.s. Military Regime And Its Policies
Since General Ne Win's seizure of power in 1962, the military regime controlling Myanmar has
called itself many things. Throughout the 1960s to 80s, it was the Burmese Socialist Programme
Party; during the late 80s to 90s, it was State Peace and Development Council; and in the present
day they're known as the State Law and Order Restoration Council. Though each of these different
names represent a different era of Burmese military control, with different policies and different
political dynamics, one thing is for certain: no matter the name, figurative political head, or
purported change in objectives, the military regime is still firmly entrenched into the country's
political workings – and they wish to keep it this way. As the Burmese people look to the future, this
is the biggest and most obvious obstacle standing in the way of progress. There is much debate and
discussion amongst the international community and within Myanmar itself as to how the Burmese
should move forward, but it is unanimous that the problem lies fundamentally with the military
regime and its policies. Aung San Suu Kyi and her National League for Democracy seek to solve
this problem through the ousting of the State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC). She
chooses to do this not through an insurgency–lead coup d'etat or mass uprising, but rather through
political maneuvership that promotes democratization (i.e. meaningful citizen representation in
parliament), constitutional reforms, and
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Burm AAnd Strong People
Leigh Lyter
October 22, 2016
Period 1
Myanmar Research Paper In 1989 the country formerly known as Burma switched its name to
Myanmar, meaning the "fast and strong people". Burma or Myanmar, began as individual states
with several powerful monarchs, over time the British government took over. This resulted in the
First Anglo–Burmese War that lasted from 1824–1826. The most respected of Myanmar's military
leaders during the war was Maha Bandula, who later died in battle. The British went on to win the
war and separate Myanmar into separate colonies in favor of certain ethnicities. Burma gained its
independence when a group called the "Thirty Comrades" created the Burmese Independence Army
and fought with Japan in World War II. The Army believed that if Japan won then they would grant
their country freedom, however when Japan began to weaken the group immediately informed the
British Military and agreed to help the British win the war. Aung San was the leader of Burma at the
time, and he establish the Burmese Independence Army and later went on to see Burma separate
from Britain, however when he assumed the position of leader of his new country he and his cabinet
members were assassinated by an opposition group. U Nu, a former cabinet member, he became
Burma's new leader. At last, Burma was given its independence on January 4, 1948. However, the
new nation was consistently provoked by ethnic communities and opposition groups, this resulted in
multiple civil wars. 10 years

Aung San Suu Kyi Research Paper
Aung San Suu Kyi was kept in house arrest for six years. During those six years, she had the option
of leaving and never returning to Burma. However, she was strong in her decision to stay in Burma
to lead the NLD and fight against the corrupt government. Aung San Suu Kyi's father, Aung San,
was a student, devoted in fighting for independence from the British. Britain seized Burma and
abolished the monarchy. Aung San and his friends, the Thakins, encouraged schools to start striking
back. In the year 1938, many schools and students were joined by peasants and workers to protest
against British rule. Meanwhile, the Thakins joined Japan to force the British out of Burma during
WWII. However, Japan became worse oppressors than Britain, pretending

Comparing Nelson Mandela, Charles Perkins, And Aung San...
Introduction
"Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King, Charles Perkins, and Aung San Suu Kyi never met, but they
fought for the same cause on four different continents." And what cause is it these renowned
pioneers for their times fought for? Justice in the form of Rights and Freedoms.
Key ideas, concepts, policies, countries, objectives, and issues
All of the key ideas, concepts, policies, countries, objectives, and issues are essential to gain an
understanding of the relevance of these individuals' roles in their nations and changing rights and
freedoms.
Their significance in their nations' struggle for rights and freedoms
Not only Charles Perkins and Nelson Mandela, but also Martin Luther King and Aung San Suu Kyi,
were extremely significant ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Students led by Perkins travelled by chartered buses to cities and towns advocating equality of race
in Australia and providing evidence for the racial discrimination that was happening so very often
then. The tour became known as the Freedom Ride and assumed iconic status not only around
Australia but also internationally. After becoming the first ever Aboriginal student in history to
graduate from University in 1965, he became the manager of the Foundation for Aboriginal Affairs
in Sydney, and in 1969 he moved to Canberra to begin work in the Office of Aboriginal Affairs. By
1984 Perkins was Secretary of the Department of Aboriginal

Argumentative Essay On Rohingya
Described as the world's most persecuted people, 1.1 million Rohingya people live in Myanmar.
They live predominately in Rakhine state, where they have co–existed uneasily alongside Buddhists
for decades.Rohingya people say they are descendants of Muslims, perhaps Persian and Arab
traders, who came to Myanmar generations ago. Unlike the Buddhist community, they speak a
language similar to the Bengali dialect of Chittagong in Bangladesh.
The Rohingya are reviled by many in Myanmar as illegal immigrants and they suffer from
systematic discrimination. The Myanmar government treats them as stateless people, denying them
citizenship. Stringent restrictions have been placed on Rohingya people's freedom of movement,
access to medical assistance, education and other basic services.
Violence broke out in northern Rakhine state on 25 August, when militants attacked government
forces. In response, security forces supported by Buddhist military launched a "clearance operation".
Refugees have spoken of massacres in villages, where they say soldiers raided and burned their
homes. The government claims the Rohingya have burned their own homes and killed Buddhists
and Hindus. It says that the military is targeting terrorists, including the Arakan RohingyaSalvation
Army (Arsa), the group that claimed responsibility for the August attacks.
According to the most recently available data from the United Nations in May, more than 168,000
Rohingya have fledMyanmar since 2012.Following violence

The Failure and Rebirth of Burmese Nationalism Essay
All people in the world strive to find a sense of belonging. This sense is coupled with ethnic
identities, cultural customs, and social implications. The groups that inhabit the corner of the world,
now known as Myanmar, have had great struggles and upheavals through the last century. They
have been stricken with World War, independence struggles, as well as military dictatorship. The
Burmese groups have tried with diligence to establish their own states, but in the end all has fallen
upon them and their tale is one of grief and sadness. The failure of Burmese nationalist movement is
through the conflicting interests of the world, the clashes between Burmese ideology, and the
differences of ethnic acceptance. However badly the movement ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
They wanted freedom from British rule and when WWII started Aung San and 29 others, known
collectively as the "Thirty Comrades" left Burma to train in Japan, hoping for liberation ("Burma").
Promises of liberation were made by Japan but after a few years, it was clear that Japan did not wish
for Burmese autonomy. Recognizing this fact, Aung San hurried quickly to negotiate a deal with the
British. He convinced the British to give them their national freedom if they were to fight the
Japanese on behalf of the British. The allied powers won and Britain started the process of halting
its operations in Burma. Aung San was hailed for his achievement of independence from Britain
though the future of Burma was not to be so lucky. Even though he was seen as a controversial
figure due to his communist politics, he was able to unite the minority groups of Burma and secure
the writing of a constitution, agreeing to officially end British control. In July of 1947, a year before
the official "independence" of Burma, Aung San and most of his cabinet were sadly murdered by an
enemy party (Badertscher). That day would be forever marked in Burmese history and San's dreams
were a glimpse at what could have happened if political thought had been more similar and other
resentments were able to be overlooked. Aung San's death and the effects show the power that
different ideologies had towards the

Oppressed People Essay
The Oppressed People of Burma
Burma, like many other Southeast Asian nations, is a land of much culture and diversity of ethnic
groups. Unfortunately, unlike the people of other nations, the people of Burma have been stripped of
their human rights. Since the military junta had overtaken the Burmese government in 1988, the
people of Burma have been among the most oppressed people in the world. The continuation of the
government's brutality has caught the attention of many outside nations around the world who
increasingly have been intervening in Burma's issues to help its people. As these occurrences are a
major issue for the people of Burma, these problems are not restricted to its boundaries. They are
also becoming a problem for ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Before that time, they had been a British colony since 1885. After fourteen years as an independent
country, they removed their government in 1962 and finally adopted a new constitution in 1974,
becoming a socialist republic. Shortly thereafter in 1988, the country's welfare turned into a brutal
military government and the military established a State Law and Order Resolution Council
(SLORC) to govern the country. Finally, in 1989 the country's name changed from Burma to
Myanmar, a name change that would parallel a change in the way the people of Burma would
appreciate their lives prior to 1988.
The Problem
Ever since Burma's government turned into a military power, the devastation that the people have
had to endure has led to intense oppression. This has become a problematic issue for Burma
including its neighboring countries such as Thailand. The government has acted inhumanely
towards its people. The oppressive acts include forced unpaid labor among its people, including its
children and the elderly. Specifically, children have been forced to labor in the fields of beans,
bricks, chilies, corn, pineapple, rice, rubber, sugarcane, and teak. Also, the government has also
forced nearly half a million of its people to move from their homes so that various projects of
construction and resource extraction can be conducted. An example of such a project is

Burm AAnd Strong People
r 22, 2016
Period 1
Myanmar Research Paper In 1989 the country formerly known as Burma switched its name to
Myanmar, meaning the "fast and strong people". Burma or Myanmar, began as individual states
with several powerful monarchs, over time the British government took over. This resulted in the
First Anglo–Burmese War that lasted from 1824–1826. The most respected of Myanmar's military
leaders during the war was Maha Bandula, who later died in battle. The British went on to win the
war and separate Myanmar into separate colonies in favor of certain ethnicity. Burma gained its
independence when a group called the "Thirty Comrades" created the Burmese Independence Army
and fought with Japan in World War II. The Army believe that if Japan won then they would grant
their country freedom, however when Japan began to weaken the group immediately informed the
British Military and agreed to help the British win the war. Aung San was the leader of Burma at the
time, and he establish the Burmese Independence Army and later went on to see Burma separate
from Britain, however when he assumed the position of leader of his new country he and his cabinet
members were assassinated by an opposition group. U Nu, a former cabinet member, he became
Burma's new leader. At last, Burma was given its independence on January 4, 1948. However, the
new nation was consistently provoked by ethnic communities and opposition groups, this resulted in
multiple civil wars. 10 years later, U Nu was taken

South Suu Kyi 's Freedom From Fear Speech
Freedom, democracy and human rights were the ideals that Burma is lacking under the reign of the
military junta led by Ne Win and his Socialist Party for fifty years. The socialist ideals have only
brought fear and poverty to the people of Burma and the protests against the military government
were always brutally suppressed. Aung San Suu Kyi, daughter of the national hero, General Aung
San who was assassinated by his rival after he fought for Burmese independence from England, was
filled with the ideals that her father fought for and became a leader for the people to unite them and
challenge the right to rule of the people in power. In Aung San Suu Kyi's Freedom From Fear
speech, she argued that the fear of losing power is the real ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
The speech reflected Suu Kyi's vision of Burma as a peaceful country and her courage which she
did use it in her favor to rouse the people who have long waited for a change. The purpose of the
speech was to made the people see a future Burma with a democratically elected government that
respects human rights and to take effective actions against the government through non–violent
confrontations. In Freedom from Fear speech, Suu Kyi begins by speaking the truth of how fear
corrupts all those wielding power and those that are being controlled. As Burma is under the
oppressive regime, she claimed that people may not be able to fight back with arms, but what they
can do is to get rid of fear from their minds, and embrace courage to bear a real revolution which
can only be succeeded if it is born of conviction that a change is desperately needed. Truth, justice
and compassion are the only barriers that can stand up against the government as a government that
is established with force and concern with only short term profits can never give the country the
whole democracy and human rights. Freedom from fear is the utmost importance in politics and
personal life as it is the start of a system that can help realize the declaration of human rights and
democracy. According to Suu Kyi, "As long as there are governments whose authority is founded on
coercion rather than on the mandate of the people and interest groups which place

Compatison of "Spotty Handed Villainesses" and "Keynote...
'A text of timeless appeal is marked by effective construction of rhetoric to support its main ideas.'
Discuss this statement, making detailed reference to at least two speeches.
Great speeches are those which timelessly captivate audiences through their integrity and rhetoric
treatment. This is relevant to Margaret Atwood's speech in 1994, Spotty Handed Villainesses
(hereafter referred to as Villainesses), and Aung San Suu Kyi's speech in 1995, Keynote Address at
the Beijing World Conference on Women (hereafter referred to as Keynote). The ability of a speech
to resonate with audiences is dependent on their effective constructive of rhetoric to support the
orator's main ideas.
In Atwood's 'Villainesses', aims to captivate audiences ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Atwood uses the rhetoric device of dirimens copulatio in the extract "what are novels anyway? Only
a very foolish person would attempt to give a definite answer to that", this hints at self–deprecation
and creates a sense of humility and textual integrity as she accept s this flaw in her argument so to
appear unbiased. Atwood argues that the depiction of women in literature ironically prevents
women's advancement, similarly Aung San Suu Kyo argues that the depiction of women in their
traditional roles of carers and nurturers has prevented their advancement in politics. Atwood
employs polyvocality to shift from complex arguments to the seemingly simplistic anecdote of the
eternal breakfast. Her literary knowledge and wit allows her to embody her message and complex
ideas to convey that she as a woman is complex. The speeches timelessness and treatment of
universal concerns through the construction of rhetoric support her argument and captivate the
attention of past and present audiences.
In 'Keynote', the composer effectively constructs rhetoric to addresses the universal issue of gender
inequality to satisfactorily call for social reform. Suu Kyi was a recognised activist for women's
right and was leader of the democracy movement in Burma. Similarly to Atwood, her context
allowed the audience to trust the speaker, enhancing her ability to engage audiences and increasing
the textual integrity of the speech. She argues that women need to gain a

Ethnic Cleansing In The Rohingya
Ethnic cleansing has not been recognized by the United Nations as an independent crime. Although,
it has been recognized as trying to rid one group of people from an area to make the other group
ethnically homogenous. To do this a group can try to promote fear in another group making them
want to leave so they do not feel safe anymore. Some of these acts can include murder, torture, rape,
etc. (Ethnic Cleansing, Un.org) This is exactly what is happening to the Rohingya in Myanmar.
They are being forced to leave their home and escape to neighboring countries because of
persecution by the primarily Buddhist, Myanmar. They are not allowed citizenship, are forced to
relocate, and been attacked by the Myanmar government on several occasions. Recent studies have
shown that over 160,000 Rohingya have fled Myanmar and over 1,000 have been killed, including
innocent men, women, and children. (Myanmar: Who are the Rohingya, aljezzera.com) The
Rohingya have been in Myanmar since 1982 and not only have gotten no recognition but are not
even allowed citizenship. This is turn limits them to having no power or say in Myanmar. The
government made the Rohingya get foreign identity cards. This in turn, angered many of the
Rohingya for their families had been there for generations. Some Rohingya had even served in the
government prior to this. All their rights to go to school, work, travel, etc. were prohibited because
they were not able to be recognized as citizens. The Myanmar

Summary Of Martin Luther King And Aung San Suu
The two world known leaders, Martin Luther King, Jr. and India's Aung San Suu, were social
activists who believed that democracy could be achieved through peaceful resistant. Martin Luther
King Jr. believed that its people who sought to stand up against oppressor regimes and fight for
equal rights in the United States of America. On the other hand, the National league for democracy
leader, Aung San Suu Kyi who lived in Burma fought for democracy in her country. Thus, one is
right to argue out that the two world leaders, Martin Luther King Jr. of America and Aung San Suu
of India, believed in the spirit of democracy and equal rights for everybody in their respective
countries. The two leaders wrote articles that have remained to be historical in world politics. The
two wrote letters concerning how their societies looked like and how they wished democracy could
be achieved someday. During his time in jail, Martin Luther King Jr. wrote a letter titled 'The Letter
from Birmingham Jail.' The letter illustrated that he was in jail in Birmingham because of lack of
justice and on how discrimination should not be the order of the day. Comparing Aung San Suu's
article, 'In Quest of Democracy,' she expresses her opinion on democracy and how she has longed to
create democracy. In both articles, the two leaders try to reach out and express their value towards
achieving a democratic state. Aung San Suu Kyi reveals her efforts to achieve a democracy state and
how she had fought against the government through peaceful demonstrations. On the other hand,
Martin Luther King Jr. expresses on how injustices have taken over governance and on how people
should rise against such regimes. In their writings, the two leaders expressed their feelings how they
have fought for equal rights and more rights for their citizens through nonviolent means. They
reveal their own experiences in the fight for justice and democracy without violating the rights of
other people. In his letter, King ascertains that he experienced injustice while he was involved in the
Montgomery Bus Boycott as well as in the Albany Movement. As the head of those movements, Dr.
King wrote what he underwent though. 'Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice

The Pros And Cons Of Tourism In Myanmar
Although some countries and the democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi have both made statement to
people do not to visit Myanmar due to many reasons such as the culture & human rights protection,
political fights and terrorist attack, the tourism became open to the world again. The National
Democratic League has boycott the activity of "Visit Myanmar year 1996" because they thought
tourism was only financially benefited the regime, but NLD made a new statement in 2011, 15 years
later, replaced of revenging the government revenue by stopping tourism, they stated that tourism
development affects Myanmar's nature, local culture and local population of Myanmar. However,
they also made acknowledge of responsible tourism can act as an important role in the country's
economy and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
And over two–thirds of the tourists who visited Myanmar in 2012 came from Asia. But a lot of the
customers did not come for vacation but for managing business. Based on the tourists' data of 2012,
the types of tourism that the customers have chosen were like the following: package tours occupied
23%; foreign independent travelers were accounted for 42%, business travelers were 20% and
others had 15%. Here we can see, two–thirds were independent international customers. Miyamoto
indicated in her article "A Study on Ethnic Tourism in Myanmar" that, the package tour customers
were much lower than the independent tour customers in 2012, the reason has high probability with
the unsound infrastructure in Myanmar; and the amount of independent tourists of 2012 were less
may related to the political unrest and terror attack additionally. In June 2012, deadly violence
occurred in the west area of Myanmar due to the tensions of religious faction and it resulted a state
of emergency declared by Burma's president. People dead and injured, hundreds of houses were
burned in the fire also and the unrest riot has been increasing. Thus, the security issues might be the
main reason why tourists increased slowly in

The Rhetorical Analysis Of Aung San Suu Kyi
Aung San Suu Kyi is a visionary that fights for Burma, her country, believing that people should
fight for democracy and freedom through non–violent movements. She had a clear knowledge of
her government and the government that she wanted for her people. As Aung Dan Suu said, it is not
power that corrupts but fear. Fear of losing power corrupts those who wield it and fear of the
scourge of power corrupts those who are subject to it (page 682). In order to bring this matter to the
reader's attention, Aung San Suu employs several rhetorical strategies. She uses the three main
rhetorical devices: ethos, pathos, and logos to provide expert opinions on the subject. Through the
text "Freedom from fear", she made her ideas clear and define for ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Aung San Suu demonstrates ethos in her speech by contrasting her father with the pacifism of
Gandhi by stating: "The words used by Jawaharlal Nehru to describe Mahatma Gandhi could be
applied to Aung San." (page684). She uses that allusion to show her admiration for Gandhi, whom
she identifies as "Abhaya", the absence of fear from the mind. Aung San Suu strongly supports his
immense contribution to human rights, peace, and non–violent resistance to fight oppression. She
uses Gandhi as an example to persuade the reader that, just like him, she is worthy of trust and
respect. She wants to show them that she has the same beliefs, same ideology as Gandhi, whom with
his moral and methods brought down imperialism, colonialism and dictatorships. Kyi even
continues to say that "there is an inevitable sameness" when she compares Gandhi to her father. A
lot of attention focused on her because she is the daughter of once an influential man, so she knows
that if she talks about him they would have no problem as to follow her. When it comes to her
thoughts about Burma's governments, Kyi shows a good amount of planning and knowledge when
talking about economic growth. She states that: "Public dissatisfaction with economic hardships has
been seen as the chief cause of the movement in Burma, sparked off by the student demonstrations
of 1988." (page682).

Case Study : Heineken 's Beer Market
MGMT720
Project Team 4
Paper Topic: Heineken in Myanmar
Assignment C: Personal trust building
Matthew Luk Introduction:
The Myanmar's beer market that has long been dominated by Myanmar Brewery, a state–owned
firm which is closely connected with the Myanmar military, with ~80 percent market share.
Although Myanmar's beer consumption is some of the lowest in Asia at just 3.2 liters per person, it
is estimated to undergo rapid growth as the market is opening after the election of Aung San Suu
Kyi in 2015.
In 2015, Heineken established a local JV partnership with Alliance Brewery Company to brew and
sell Heineken beers in Myanmar. They have opened a $US60 million brewery near the commercial
capital Yangon to brew Heineken for the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Here are some of the highlights of the major barriers for each of the strategic option that would
negatively impact trust building with stakeholders.
Option 1: Alliance with Carlsberg
Contextual:
1. Unfamiliar cultures/language: Although both Heineken and Carlsberg are considered foreign
multinational companies, there are still differences in corporate governance and culture between the
two firms, which might create barriers for a successful partnership. Moreover, the difference in
culture between the two local JV company (Alliance Brewery Company and Golden Star Group)
will make the alliance more complicated. The difference in language used for these 4 parties
(English or Dutch for Heineken, Danish/English for Carlsberg, and Burmese for Alliance Brewery
Company and Golden Star Group) will create additional trust barrier during the negotiation process.
Organizational:
1. Personnel turnover: As Carlsberg already has a Bago plant located in the targeted expansion
regions , having a partnership with Carlsberg means the employment of the Carlsberg employees in
the Bago plant might be affected, as Heineken might want to put their own management/workers in
the plant based on the new ownership structure. It is not sure whether the Bago plant management
and workers will trust the new owner.
Option 2: Organic growth

Contextual:
1. Suspicion of outsiders (esp. companies) and social conflict: It is not sure that

Aung San Suu Kyi Suicide
What are you willing to risk for the people of your country? Your life? Your freedom? That was the
question Aung San Suu Kyi had to answer when she was faced with extreme opposition for her view
of a democratic government for her country of Burma (Myanmar). Aung San Suu Kyi was born and
spent part of her life in Burma but went abroad to continue her education. She returned in 1988 to a
country in the midst of a violent protest against U Ne Win, the nation's leader. She began to speak
out against U Ne Win and rallied for peace and democracy. In 1989, she was placed under house
arrest and cut off from the rest of the world. The government told her that if she agreed to leave the
country, they would free her but she refused. She stood her ground

Comparative Essay
Comparing Aung San Suu Kyi's excerpt from "In Quest with Democracy" and Martin Luther King's
"Letter from Birmingham Jail" Aung San Suu Kyis and Martin Luther King Jr. are among the great
activists the world has ever witnessed who have gallantly championed for the liberation of the
masses from oppressing institutions and systems of power. Both authors had rooted their campaigns
in the tenets of their religious faith, which endeared themselves with the masses. Change is
inevitable and their efforts in no doubt bore fruits for in each case they have received world
recognition for what they did for the people. Aung San Suu Kyi's excerpt "In Quest with
Democracy" and Martin Luther King's "Letter from Birmingham Jail", surpassed other ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Both are agree that oppressive institutions will only change from struggles of liberation. Austin (47)
argues while appealing to logic, King explained why it was in the leaders' pretext whether religious
or not to sympathize with the masses in their plight highlighting the ugliness of injustice for he says,
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere". By using innuendos, King criticizes those
who turn a blind eye to injustices around them. Suu Kyi also digs deep to the injustices of the
military regimes in Burma that viewed democracy as western ideology and alien to non–Western
world so that they would cling to the reigns of power without opposition (propaganda). Though both
texts appeal for peaceful negotiations, to achieve rights of the people, King implies that if the
oppressive institutions do not give in, the masses should act in a manner which forces for a
resolution. The situation depicted by Suu Kyi in Burma is of political injustices; the rights of the
Burmese to free and fair elections in a democratic nation are negated by despotic leaders who do not
practice the Buddhist traditions. According to Austin (82) Suu Kyi became the voice of the people
and through her the masses have seen the authoritarian rule which is not acting in their best
interests. King presents the social injustices that the blacks and the minorities in American society
face. The

What Key Event Happened In 1990
Questions:
1) What key event happened in 1947, as depicted early in the film, and how do you feel this may
have affected the young Aung San Suu Kyi's attitude toward politics in her later life?
In 1947, Kyi was only 2 years old when her father led a movement for the independence of Burma.
Named Aung San, her father paved the way for the independence of Burma. However, shortly after
the independence, he was assassinated along with his several colleagues. The people who
assassinated him were masked and in proper uniforms.
After the incident, Kyi was sent to England, however, this incident would have made her revengeful
that she used in a positive sense to support democracy and betterment of Burma.
2) Why did Aung San Suu Kyi return to Burma in 1988, and how did she become involved in the
political situation there? Why do you think she became involved, even though she had not
previously been involved in politics? ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, when her mother fell ill, she was forced to return to Burma in 1988. On her return she saw
many people in hospital and surroundings who not only praised and remembered her father but also
were injured and shattered after the 8888 Uprising. This made Kyi felt conscious of how badly these
people need a change and reform in Burma for their actual independence.
3) What key event happened in 1990, and what were the reactions of Aung San Suu Kyi and her
supporters, as well as the reaction of the military rulers?
In 1990, elections were held in Burma where Kyi and her party won by majority. While Kyi and her
supporters were happy and confident of their win and probable reforms, the military refused to
accept the results of elections. She was put under house arrest while her family including husband
and children were banned to enter Burma. She spent a decade in house arrest.
4) What key event happened to Aung San Suu Kyi and her family in

What Is The Theme Of The Glass Palace
Deepa Bavanasi The Glass Palace
Amitav Ghosh explores different storytelling forms and complicates the picture of pre– and
postcolonial South Asian identity in his fourth novel The Glass Palace1. His ambitious epic tells
"the stories of a cast of characters, royal working – clogs, and bourgeois Indians, Bengalis, and
Burmese – as they grapple with their sense of place and self while violent historical events reshape
twentieth century Burma and India2".
Amitav Ghosh's The Glass Palace is an evocation of the recent past of the glorious culture and
eventual of Burma along with the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Yes, look around you, look at how we live. Yes, we who ruled the riches land in Asia are now
reduced to this. This is what they have done to us, this is what they will do to all of Burma. They
took out kingdom, promising roads and railways and ports, but mark my words, this is how it will
end. In a few decades the wealth will be gone – all the gems, the timber and the oil – and then they
too will leave. In our golden Burma where no one ever went hungry and no one was too poor to
write and read, all that will remain is destitution and ignorance, famine and despair. We were the
first to be imprisoned in the name of their progress; millions more will follow. This is what awaits
us all: this is how we will all end – as prisoners, in shantytowns born of the plague. A hundred years
hence you will read the indictment of Europe's greed in the difference between the kingdom of Slam
and the state of our own enslaved realm. (88) The formal declaration of Burma's independence in
1948 and the initial phase of democratic order were replaced by military rule which did not evoke
the popular unrest as there is not so much public awareness. It is rather strange that the military
dictatorship was able to combine two characteristics of earlier regimes, a central heard akin to a
monarch as the sole source of power and the repressive nature of colonial rule, without the benefits
of either. The country still reels under its sway

Aung San Suu Kyi: Activist and Political Leader
In Warren Bennis' book, "On Being A Leader", He identifies the key traits of a good leader as "
having a... guiding vision, passion, curiosity, integrity and being daring". When deciding to choose
which leader to research for my final paper I looked to find someone who possessed Bennis' stated
traits of a great leader. I chose the activist and political leader from the country of Burma
(Myanmar), Aung San Suu Kyi.
Biography (Early Life)
Aung San Suu Kyi was born in Burma on June 19, 1945. She was raised in Burma through her early
years then eventually joined her mother, Daw Khin Kyi in India. Both of her parents were heavily
involved in politics. Her mother, Daw Khin Kyi, was appointed as the Burmese ambassador to India
in 1960. Her father, General Aung San was a revered national hero in Burma, well known for
leading the Burmese people to independence. She was partly educated in India and eventually
attended St. Hugh's College and Oxford University, where she received her bachelor's and master's
degree in politics, economics and philosophy. Afterward, she worked in the United Nations
Secretariat in New York for two years. In 1972 she married a well–known scholar named Michael
Vaillancourt Aris. The pair went on to have two sons, Alexander and Kim. (BOOK BIOGRAPHY
OF HER LIFE) In 1988 Suu Kyi had just returned to Burma from studying abroad to tend to her ill
mother. She came home to find that chaos had erupted in Burma. Burma was in the midst of
political upheaval

The Political Engagement Of Burma
As Burma seeks to distance itself from China, despite Burma's failed engagement on the energy
front, India may very well be destined to be the major beneficiary. Burma has been grateful that
India has focused on education, provision of technology and services, and infrastructure just as
much as it has focused on energy (Maini, 2014). With all things considered, China virtually has
monopoly over Burma's offshore gas fields. Its economic and political engagement in Burma is
greater than any other country in the world beyond comparison.
Tribal Rights Approximately 33% of Burma's population consists of tribal groups. The population
ranges from the Wa and Kachins in the North, to the Chins in the Northwest, to the Rohingya
Muslims with ties ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Contrary to popular belief, the tribes are weary of Burma becoming a democracy too soon. "Suu Kyi
is little more than a symbol of the wrong issue – democracy first! Ethnic rights and the balance of
ethnic power are preconditions for democracy (Kaplan, 2011). The granddaughter of famous
military general Aung San, Aung San Suu Kyi, has led Burma's National League of Democracy.
India has a strong relationship with Suu Kyi, as India supported Burma's democracy leader prior to
changing its policy to engagement with the regime. Suu Kyi studied in India, won the Nehru Award
for International Peace in 1982, and her family has strong ties to Jawaharlal Nehru (Myint–U,
2011). Although Suu Kyi and the tribes are against the same military, their visions for the order are
different by which a transition to a civilian government must to occur. The major concern of the
tribes is their rights through a federation that grants them self–rule. Suu Kyi specifically desires
elections, with less regard for the distinctive approach that will be necessary in order to satisfy the
tribes. India and Suu Kyi have distanced from each other, creating an opportunity for India to
advocate for the tribes. The tribes may very well look to India as a model to follow given India's
own form of

The Genocide in Myanmar Essay
Super Biased Research Paper In the past two years, a genocide has been going on in Myanmar that
little people around the world know about. The victims that have been affected by this mass murder
are the Rohingya Muslims, who originated from the subcontinent of India and are a minority group
that makes up 5% of the country's population. Today, the physical and emotional abuse endured by
the Rohingya Muslims prevails a prominent issue in the Middle East. Over in Burma, many of the
Muslims are murdered, beaten, or attacked by various religious groups, while government officials
either stand and watch or occasionally help. The Rohingya Muslims is a small Muslim group that
emerged in India during the time of the British Raj. The group ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The leaders include the president of Burma, Thein Sein, and a famous politician of the country,
Aung San Suu Kyi. The two groups comprise of the Sangha, which is a community of Buddhist
monks, and the Rakhine Nationalities Development Group (RNDG), which is a political party in
Myanmar. In 1991, Aung San Suu Kyi won the Nobel Peace Prize for forming the National League
for Democracy and coincidently disapproved of violence and hoped that all ethnic groups could
"cooperate in harmony." Since then, she has denied any evidence of an ethnic cleansing, when asked
about it in an interview and she has talked about the Rohingya Muslims, stating that "They are not
our citizens." The president, Thein Sein, has done many things to contribute to the ethnic cleansing.
He has come up with ideas to end the ethnic cleansing, such as "expelling" the muslims from the
country or getting the United Nations to "resettle" them somewhere else.
The Rohingya Muslims have tried many things to cope with these attacks, resulting in both good
and bad outcomes. For most of the Rohingyas, they were either kicked

Analysis Of The Article ' Ralph Waldo Emerson '
Nhan Chau
Ms.Patton
English 3
10 September 2015 Aung San Suu Kyi Ralph Waldo Emerson was an American essayist,
philosopher, and poet, most of his philosophy is different from the real world. In the article "Self–
Reliance", Emerson's view of the non–conformist is important for each individual in order for them
to be independent and follow their own thoughts. Each individual should believe in themselves,
value their own experience, and share with society. Based on Emerson's belief, Aung San Suu Kyi is
a non– conformist because she is independent, has no fear, and believes what she does is right. It is
important for each individual to value their own self reliance, opinion, experience, believe in
themselves and be brave to do what they think is right. Believing in ourselves is the key to being
successful. Emerson comments, "To believe your own thought, to believe that what is true for you in
private heart is true for all men – that is genius." (01). Emerson encouraged people to believe in
themselves, no matter what others thought. Each individual's mind has value and society has no
power to control us. We were born to enjoy life, so we have the power to do what we think is right.
Emerson also states, "It is easy in the world to live after the world's opinion; it is easy in solitude to
live after our own, but the great man is he who in the midst of the crowd keeps with perfect
sweetness the independence of solitude." (05). People should stand up for themselves and

Pepsi Co Essay
PepsiCo gained entry to India in 1988 by creating a joint venture with the Punjab government–
owned Punjab Agro Industrial Corporation (PAIC) and Voltas India Limited. This joint venture
marketed and sold Lehar Pepsi until 1991 when the use of foreign brands was allowed; PepsiCo
bought out its partners and ended the joint venture in 1994. [1] Others claim that firstly Pepsi was
banned from import in India, in 1970, for having refused to release the list of its ingredients and in
1993, the ban was lifted, with Pepsi arriving on the market shortly afterwards. These controversies
are a reminder of "India's sometimes acrimonious relationship with huge multinational companies."
Indeed, some argue that PepsiCo and The Coca–Cola Company have "been ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
But an Indian parliamentary committee, in 2004, backed up CSE's findings and a government–
appointed committee is now trying to develop the world's first pesticide standards for soft drinks.
Coke and PepsiCo opposed the move, arguing that lab tests aren't reliable enough to detect minute
traces of pesticides in complex drinks. On December 7, 2004, India's Supreme Court ruled that both
PepsiCo and competitor The Coca–Cola Company must label all cans and bottles of the respective
soft drinks with a consumer warning after tests showed unacceptable levels of residual pesticides.
[citation needed]
Both companies continue to maintain that their products meet all international safety standards
without yet implementing the Supreme Court ruling.[citation needed] As of 2005, The Coca–Cola
Company and PepsiCo together hold 95% market share of soft–drink sales in India. [4] PepsiCo has
also been alleged to practice "water piracy" due to its role in exploitation of ground water resources
resulting in scarcity of drinking water for the natives of Puthussery panchayat in the Palakkad
district in Kerala, India. Local residents have been pressuring the government to close down the
PepsiCo unit in the village.
In 2006, the CSE again found that soda drinks, including both Pepsi and Coca–Cola, had high levels
of pesticides in their drinks. Both PepsiCo and The Coca–Cola Company maintain that their drinks
are safe for consumption

Film Analysis Of The Lady
The Lady details the political upheavals that rocked Burma (also known as "Myanmar") during the
second half of the 20th century. The Lady is set primarily in Burma. However, many scenes are set
in England. The film, as a biopic, makes many claims about the events that occurred during Ang San
Suu Kyi's rise to power. It also prompts questions about the causes and effects of the events in the
movie. Additionally, the film creates an experience for the viewer that written history cannot
emulate. The Lady is the most significant film concerning Ang San Suu Kyi's life. In this paper, I
will examine this movie from a number of different lenses. Truth Claims: The Lady presents various
truth claims through many different forms. The costuming, the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Suu Kyi did the same. Some in their country were concerned that both these leaders were too far
influenced by their time in the west. In order to disaffirm these concerns, Gandhi dressed like a
common Indian civilian. In this way, he was displaying his love for India over his love for England.
Suu kyi acted similarly. Suu Kyi was the daughter of the former leader of the country. She could
have dressed in all the opulence and affluence of royalty. Rather, in the film she dressed simply, and
elegantly. This dress choice reflected her graceful character. This costuming decision gave us insight
into Ang Suu's character. As Michelle Yeoh (the actress who played Suu Kyi) told Pagesix, a branch
of the NYTimes, the silk and cotton costumes are all Burmese. (Pagesix.com Staff) Additionally, the
movie pictured Suu Kyi in key scenes with flowers in her hair. These flowers made Kyi look
angelic.. To many westerners, these flowers represented the hope for a greater life that Ang San Suu
Kyi offered her nation. However, others viewed these flowers as a threat. Hannah Beech of
time.com writes about the real–life military dictators of Burma, "But they still act as if there is no
greater enemy than this slight woman with flowers in her hair" (Beech). The director made sure that
we noticed these flowers in Kyi's hair. There was a close–up shot of her placing the flowers in her
hair. There was a tracking shot that seemed to zoom in on the blossoms.

Burm A Military Dictatorship Country For Many Years
Burma used to be a military dictatorship country for several years. The military dictatorship system
was initially led by General Ne Win, who ruled the country with brutality since 1962. In 1974, the
government forced people to approve a new constitution for establishing a one–party (Burma
Socialist Program Party or BSPP) government with 415 members. General Ne Win changed the
name of the country to the Socialist Republic of the Union of Burma. They held a one–party
election and General Ne Win turned into Chairman of the State Council and President of Burma U
Ne Win. However, the military junta was still controlling. Burma's economy were facing bankruptcy
by 1987 (Background Information). As people suffered from the extreme political ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
She gave a speech to the masses of people who were gathering at Shwedagon Pagoda in Rangoon.
In September, during the congress meeting, a multi–party system was voted by 75% of the
representatives. However, the BSPP turned down the changes. The protests kept going and the army
and police forces also began to support the protestors (The protests of "8888"). Using excessive
brutal measures, the Burmese military made the protests stop and took the power again on
September 18, 1988. General Saw Maung abolished the 1974 constitution and established the "State
Law and Order Restoration Council(SLORC)". However, in 1997, the SLORC was broken down
and changed to the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC) which continued to rule until
2010 by General Than Shwe. National League for Democracy (NLD) party was one of the notable
political parties in 1988 and 1989. It was led by Aung San Suu Kyi. Since she was very popular like
today, the SLORC put her under house arrest in July 1989 (Background Information). The
government made her remain under house arrest in Rangoon for six years. In May 1990, the free
and fair multi–party election was held. Although NLD leader was under house arrest, they won "392
of 485 parliamentary seats (or 80% of the seats)". Nevertheless, "The SLORC refused to transfer
power to the NLD claiming that transfer of power to a civilian government could not happen

Aung San Suu Kyi And The Lottery By Shirley Jackson
Different people make the world go round Human clones may make an exceptional story line for a
mainstream science fiction movie. However if we all were clones, our world would lack the
diversity it thrives on. We would be stuck in a humdrum cycle without the diversity others bring.
Barbara Johnson expresses acceptance of diversity by saying "We, as human beings, must be willing
to accept people who are different from ourselves." Discrimination, acceptance and tolerance toward
diverse people are values that today's society's struggles with the most. "American Flag stands for
Tolerance" newspaper editorial by Ronald J. Allen, "Towards a True Refuge" speech by Aung San
Suu Kyi and "The Lottery" short story by Shirley Jackson demonstrate, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Allowing people to flourish by their own means gives them the power to dictate their own beliefs.
Whatever these beliefs may be we must learn to accept them through ways presented in Aung San
Suu Kyi's speech in order to avoid disarray. She states "the only way out of an impasse of hate ,
bloodshed and social and economic chaos credited by men is for those men to get together to find a
peaceful solution"( Suu Kyi CR 12). The answer to peace and acceptance is within the place it was
loss, ourselves. We have to change our instinct to judge people to an instinct of acceptance. Society
must make this change through interaction and conversation, ways brought up in Suu Kyi's speech,
with one another to ultimately understand and accept people different from ourselves. In order for
society to accept people unlike ourselves, we must learn to have tolerance for their views. Emphasis
on differing views and the importance of tolerating them is shown when Ronald J. Allen wrote "with
controversy comes debate, enlightenment, and renewed commitment" (Allen 20). Tolerating
contrasting ideas to our own brings new arguments and
Sears 3 points to the surface that would have otherwise been left unaddressed. Putting prominence
on contradictory views opens society up to learn and continue to grow from one another. Without
understanding others, who are different from

Fighting for Equality and Freedom Essays
Across all nations and cultures, the enduring pursuit of equality in life seems global and timeless.
Some would believe that their own country has achieved a true democracy with no residual
inequalities of which to speak, while others know they are at the other end of the spectrum, enduring
unjust laws that should not be bestowed on any human. Through the course of history many
countries have fought for that democracy and all the equality that it implies. While some believe
they have reached that goal, others continue to fight for the most basic human rights, even in this
time of enlightenment. The journey each country takes on its road to that place may vary by
origination, length, severity and outcome, but the goal seems to be the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In more recent history, King reminds readers of the fundamental values that the United States were
built on as written in the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, showing once again that
equality was the intention of the forefathers from the beginning. His vivid examples of the daily
injustices still endured by the Negro society despite written law against such behaviors put a visual
image to the term "injustice" that could not be ignored. In one example, King writes, "your speech
stammering as you seek to explain to your six year old daughter why she can't go to the public
amusement park...and you see tears welling up in her little eyes when she is told that Funtown is
closed to colored children," appealing to all people on a different level – that of a mother or father,
instead of black or white (177). While imprisoned by an unjust law for leading a peaceful
demonstration, a blatant violation of his First Amendment right, King's thoughtful and thorough
response to the eight clergymen's letter conveyed patience and love while steadfastly demanding
equality long overdue. Although decades after King, Aung San Suu Kyi's agenda was basically the
same; however, her attempts to gain general equality in a democracy for all citizens of Burma have
not been as successful. The excerpt "From In Quest of Democracy" seems a more formal approach
seeking to remind both the junta in charge and the ordinary citizens of the goodness, compassion,
and

Suu Kyi 's Story Is One That Will Never Be Forgotten
Myanmar, formerly known as Burma is a country located in South– East Asia. It is here, from the
years 1962 onwards, that we have used as our example of a breach of humans rights, as a
government abuses its power and brings a country to ashes, and how one individual has made an
astounding impact to change the lives of those affected for the better. Aung San Suu Kyi's story is
one that will never be forgotten. This is a woman, who sacrificed her freedom, for the country
Burma's rights for a non–violent democratic government. And so the story goes.
In Burma, 1962, a dictator, U Ne Win, carried out a coup d'état, or an "overtake", of the ruling
government party. U Ne Win introduced the Revolutionary Council of the Union of Burma, whose
members ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When she returned she found widespread slaughter of protestors rallying against the brutal dictator
U Ne Win. Outraged by this violence she spoke out against him and initiated a nonviolent
movement toward achieving democracy and human rights. Soon, her efforts were noticed and in
July 1989 the Junta military government placed Suu Kyi under house arrest and cut off any
communication she might have had with the outside world. The Union military told Suu Kyi that
she would be set free under the conditions that she agreed to leave the country, but she refused to do
so – insisting that she would continue her struggle until the junta released the country to a civilian
government and freed their political prisoners.
This was the first sacrifice Aung San Suu Kyi made for her country. Instead of leaving, and
pretending that Burma's troubles were no longer hers, she stayed. She stayed to make a difference.
For 6 years, she stayed in house arrest.
In 1990 a parliamentary election was held, and the party that Aung San Suu Kyi was associated,
called the National League for Democracy, won with 80% votes in their favour. However, the Junta
military government overruled these results, and 20 years later declared them invalid.
Although she was unable to personally stand up to the government while she was in house arrest,
people all across the globe were beginning to take note of her. Suu Kyi was awarded a human rights
prize, known as the Rafto Prize in 1990.

The Freedom Of Burm Kyi Suu Kyi
"S is for Suu Kyi, fearless voice of Burma" (Cynthia 22). Aung San Suu Kyi has sacrificed a lot for
Burma, or Myanmar, and its people. Suu Kyi has done a lot of fearless things for Myanmar, and its
people, and she proves that you can do pretty much anything you want to in this world, when
fighting for the right cause. Doing what is right, no matter the circumstance has brought Aung San
Suu Kyi to do fearless things. In 1820 Burma was taken under British rule, and in 1886 was
considered part of India thanks to the British (Baderstcher, "Our world: Myanmar"). In 1937, is
when Burma got its official title as Burma, and became its own colony (Baderstcher, "Our world:
Myanmar"; Schraff 1994:84). Suu Kyi 's father, Aung San , ran the "1940 's nationalist movement",
that secured Burma 's freedom, from Britten, and in 1948, Burma got its independence from Britten
( Ashby, Gore Ohrn 1995: 285; Schraff 1994:84). But Suu Kyi 's Father, wasn't there to see that day,
he was assassinated in 1947, "just months" before he was going to be the "leader of the new
independent state", but they still considered him as the "Father of Modern Burma" ( Ashby, Gore
Ohrn 1995: 285; Victor 1998: 8). Aung San Suu Kyi was just 2 years old, when he was assassinated
(Schraff 1994:84). Aung San Suu Kyi was born on June 19th , in Rangoon Burma, or now Yangon
Myanmar, with a "father who craved independence, and a mother who had a great sense of duty"
(Davis, 2015; Ashby, Gore Ohrn 1995:285). Suu Kyi

Disadvantages Of Rohingya
Rohingya's are a Muslim ethnic minority group that has lived as an inhabitance in Mayanmar for
centuries, Today more than a million of them lives in the country, most in the western coastal state
of Rakhine . Where they make up around a third of the population .They speak their own language
which is not recognized by the state. It is one of the poorest states in the country with ghetto– like
camps and a lack of basic service and opportunities due to ongoing violence persecution, hundreds
and thousands of Rohingya have fled to neighbouring Countries either land or boat over the course
of many decades. Muslim have lived in the area now known as Myanmar since as early as the 12th
century, according to many historians and Rohingya groups.The Arakan Rohingya national
organization has said Rohingya have been living in Arakan from time immemorial referring to the
area known as Rakhine. After independence the government viewed the migration that look place
during British rule as illegal , and it is on this basis that they refuse citizenship to the majority of
Rohingya. This has led many Buddhists to consider the Rohingya to be Bengali, rejecting the term
Rohingya as a recent invention, created for
Political reasons. In 2010, when the military leaders released pro – democracy leader of Mayanmar
Ayng San Suu Kyi from house arrest, Most of the political leaders thought Burma was beginning to
change for the better. When they demanded citizenship they also asked for the state that had been
promised to them. Ultimately the army crushed the resistance movement. Hundreds and thousands
of desperate Rohingya people are fleeing a vicious military purage in Myanmar. Troops have burned
scores of villages, beheading men raping women, and even killing children. In some place, Buddhist
militias and people have joined in the attacks against the Muslim majority Rohingya. The Myanmar
army and government call their assault a counterterrorist operation, but the U,N, has labeled it a text
book example of ethnic cleansing. The government of Myanmar officially recognizes 135 ethnic
group. This sounds like, to use a technical term a lot. It would thus seem that they tried to be pretty
inclusive, at least when making these official

Aung San Suu Kyi and Faith Bandler
Aung San Suu Kyi:
Her words strike the tone of what is to follow; establishing the structure, purpose and goals of what
is hoped will be achieved.
References' to the United Nations and the "international Year of Tolerance" give added authority to
what is being said. It provides an international context for the issues being raised and greater sense
of urgency for what is being advocated, Aung San also effectively uses her "own experience" in
campaigning for human rights and power sharing in Burma, to "emphasize the positive aspect of
tolerance." The speaker establishes her purpose in the opening paragraph, " I want to try and vice
some of the common hopes which firmly unite us in all our splendid diversity." This is reference to
"common ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
She wants to sketch the efforts of those who have struggled so hard to improve indigenous rights but
she also wants to show t hat there are those who deliberately turn a blind eye to the past. This 'sight'
imagery is effective because she talks metaphorically of "ignorance" and "blindness to other
peoples' way of life".
Faith talks about her own difficulty in fathoming the "millions... who are hungry... who are
homeless... who are without work." She also talks about those who are "wrongfully imprisoned"
[maybe use this as the intro], tortured and murdered. The dimensions of suffering on the basis of
"differences" are incomprehensible [link this to the aborigines]. She had asked herself, "why is it so
hard to find our commonalities?" she cites prejudice and a tendency to be condemnatory rather than
give praise to those who "patiently bear the brunt of many misdeeds and indecencies."
She specifically addresses the "you" within her audience when she refer to the "struggle to
reconcile" in order to lighten "the burden of that terrible baggage that has to do with our
differences." She mentions the active and violent dispossession of land, describing the loss of life,
"fierce battles and conflict."
Faith begins by acknowledging and thanking her audience but quickly assers that she is saddened
because little real reconciliation progress seems to have been made since

Democracy Was Not Suitable For Burma
From 1948 – 1962, the country existed as a democratic republic, but was largely dysfunctional as
there were continued insurgencies by different ethnic and political factions, such as the Red Flag
Communists, the White Flag Communists, the Thirty Comrades, the Revolutionary Burma Army,
and the Karen National Union. In 1962 General Ne Win and the Revolutionary Council led a
military Junta that seized control of the Government. They deposed of Prime Minister U Nu and
openly declared that "Parliamentary democracy was not suitable for Burma." (Hoare 2015) The
highly superstitious and oppressive leadership of Ne Win can be observed in what was labeled The
Burmese Path to Socialism – a guiding ethos to the government of the time that was largely
oppressive. The key tenants to this path included a totalitarian military rule, which gave no freedoms
to its people. Like many other communist dictatorships, it embraced an attitude of authoritarian
socialism, anti–western sentiment, and anti–intellectual fervor. In Beyond Rangoon we bear witness
to the story of Aung Ko, a University Professor who was fired for housing student protestors,
despite not being involved in any other way. (Boorman 1995) Anti–intellectualism is a key for
oppressive regimes to retain power, as they must succeed in silencing all criticism and dissent. More
than just being anti–western, the country adopted a militant Burmese nationalism that led to a
xenophobic exclusion of "the other." This, some ways, was a relic

Oppresship In Frederick Douglass
Paulo Freire once said, "No one can be authentically human while he prevents others from being
so." To me this quote means that no one can call themselves human while dehumanizing others. The
Narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass by Frederick Douglass takes us on Douglass' journey
growing up during slavery. His story shows us the forms of oppression he was faced with, like the
violence not only he had to endure but also witness. Similarly the Myanmar: Who are the Rohingya?
By Al Jazeera Staff discusses how this group of people are being displaced and targeted by violence.
This violence and displacement is the main form of oppression the Rohingya people have to deal
with and fight against. Both Frederick Douglass and the Staff of The New York Time and Al Jazeera
argue that oppression is perpetuated by violence and power. However, Frederick Douglass argues
oppression is overcome by education, while the Al Jazeera and The New York Times say that
oppression is overcome by Aung San Suu Kyi fighting for over 1 million rohingyan people's rights.
Both Frederick Douglass and the Al Jazeera Staff argue that oppression is perpetuated through
violence and power. An example of this violence and power is in The narrative of the life of
Frederick Douglass, he takes us on his own real life experiences coming face to face with this
violence since he was a slave. Douglass says "Whom he used to tie up to a joist, and whip upon her
naked back till she was literally covered with blood." This shows exactly how the oppression of
slaves was perpetuated, making slaves so scared by abusing them and treating them less than human
so they would not fight back. Another example of oppression being perpetuated through violence
and power can be found in Myanmar: Who are the Rohingya? This article discusses the
displacement of this "ethnic group" and not only the violence they also experience, but how difficult
their lives are for being who they are. The author says, "During such crackdowns, refugees have
often reported rape, torture, arson, and murder by Myanmar security forces. " The phrase "reported
rape, torture, arson, and murder by Myanmar security forces" shows exactly how violence and
power is being used against the Rohingya

Thesis About Rohingya
Who are the Rohingya? Described as the world's most persecuted people, 1.1 million Rohingya
people live in Myanmar. They live predominately in Rakhine state, where they have co–existed
uneasily alongside Buddhists for decades. Rohingya people say they are descendants of Muslims,
perhaps Persian and Arab traders, who came to Myanmar generations ago. Unlike the Buddhist
community, they speak a language similar to the Bengali dialect of Chittagong in Bangladesh. The
Rohingya are reviled by many in Myanmar as illegal immigrants and they suffer from systematic
discrimination. The Myanmar government treats them as stateless people, denying them citizenship.
Stringent restrictions have been placed on Rohingya people's freedom of movement, access ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
On 4 September, the UN said its aid agencies had been blocked from supplying life–saving supplies
such as food, water and medicine to thousands of civilians in northern Rakhine state. What's the
background to the story? For decades ethnic tensions have simmered in Rakhine state, with frequent
outbreaks of violence. In October 2016 nine police officers were killed by armed men, believed by
officials to be Muslims. Amid the ensuing violence, 87,000 Rohingya Muslims fled to Bangladesh
and government troops expanded their presence in Rakhine state. At the time, a senior UN official
alleged that the Myanmar government was seeking to rid the country of its Muslim minority – an
accusation that has been made repeatedly by human rights groups. The government denies the
charge. In August, Myanmar further increased the number of troops in Rakhine, after seven
Buddhists were found hacked to death. The buildup of troops prompted warnings of a fresh wave of
violence. The most recent violence is seen as a major escalation not only because of the scale, but
because of the involvement of the new Rohingya militant group, the Arakan Rohingya Salvation
Army. It says the attacks on government forces were an act of

Common Themes in Speeches by Passionate Leaders
An effective and enthralling speech does not only relate to the content or context, but to the
appropriate utilisation of rhetorical techniques and structure that contest universal requisite ideas,
past, present and future that captivate and engage audiences. Since the beginning of time, society
has been presented with inspirational and passionate leaders who deliver speeches that remain
invaluable due to their themes regarding peace, security, prejudice, equality and basic human rights.
These themes are explored in Anwar Sadat's, Aung San Suu Kyi and Faith Bandlers unique speeches
"Statement to the Knesset" (1977), "Keynote Address at the Beijing World Conference on Women"
(1995) and "Hope, Faith and Reconciliation" (1999) which allow the memory of the past and a
reminder of who we are today.
Continuous battles and terrorism between Israel and Egypt had been occurring four years preceding
to Anwar Sadat's "Statement to the Knesset" (1977). Anwar Sadat, the Prime Minister of Egypt,
address to the Israeli Knesset was presented to an audience which involved both parties and persons
who supported and resented him. Sadat draws upon religious, political and personal values to
motivate and propose to the Israeli Knesset a solution for peace to the extremity of an age long
conflict between the Egypt and Israel.
Beginning his speech, Sadat employs the use of religious allusions and pathos in order to set the
foundations of his argument to bring unity to both countries through the

Healthcare Should Be Suu Kyi 's First Priority For...
Introduction Than Aung is the current minister for the Ministry of Health in Burma. Than Aung is
fairly new to this job; he assumed office 1 August 2014. Than Aung is preceded by Pe Thet Khin
who was the minister from March 2011– July 2014. Before Aung became minister, he was the
Deputy Minister of the Ministry of Health in Burma. He was also a member of the Naypidaw
Council and was the Director of the Myanmar Army Medical Corps. Having such a successful
career so far, his opinion is taken very seriously with issues of healthcare.
Topic 1: The Platform of Aung San Suu Kyi
Aung San Suu Kyi states, "If suffering were an unavoidable part of our existence, we should try to
alleviate it as far as possible in practical, earthly ways." Healthcare should be Suu Kyi's first priority
for reforming Burma. Burmese citizens, namely children, are not getting the healthcare that they
deserve. Although Burma is striving for universal healthcare, the amount of money allotted is not
enough for people to get the proper care that they need. As of 2014, Burma allotted approximately
$USD18 per capita while the regional average of south–east Asia was approximately $USD70 per
capita. Burma needs to budget more money for healthcare. The mortality rate of children under the
age of five in Burma is 9.3% higher than the global average, and children are not the only place
where issues arise. Almost 1 in 4 Burmese citizens between 30–70 die from a noncommunicable
disease (NCD) of either a cancer,

Aung San Suu Kyi Essay Questions
Question No. 1 Answer:
The movie is remarkable story of Aung San Suu Kyi (Michelle Yeoh) and her husband, Michael Aris
(David Thewlis). It is likewise the story of the peaceful mission of the woman who is at the center
of Burma's democracy movement. Notwithstanding separation, long separations, and a hazardously
threatening administration, their affection perseveres until the very end. In 1947, when Aung San
Suu Kyi is two years of age, her father Aung San drives Burma to independence. Be that as it may,
soon subsequently, on 19 July 1947, he alongside a gathering of his partners is killed by a gathering
of armed men in uniform. As a grown–up Suu Kyi goes to England, discovers an adoring husband,
and has an upbeat family life. Yet, in 1988 her mom's weakness compels her to come back to Burma
where her father, Aung San, is still generally recollected. Movie synopsis likewise uncovers that in
1947; the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Suu's vicinity causes distress for the heartless, distrustful and superstitious officers who standard the
nation. They might want to be freed of her; however her unmistakable quality, her global
associations and the hesitance to make another saint like Aung San keep them from utilizing the
standard fierce routines. Rather, Suu is welcome to leave the nation and afterward, when she won't,
is set under a house arrest that will extend, in different structures, more than two decades. Moreover
when she visits her mom in the healing center in 1988, she meets a large portion of the individuals
who were injured amid the Tatmadaw's crackdown in the 8888 Uprising. She understands that
political change is required in Burma and is soon attracted into the movement to advance change.
She acknowledges the part of symbol in backing of self–determination by the Burmese individuals
and dedicates herself to exercises in backing of objectives of more prominent political

Sphere Of Influence
Sphere of Influence
Aung San Suu Kyi influenced the people of Myanmar or Burma, which is East of India. The People
of Myanmar were influenced by her because she spoke up against the harsh rule of dictator U Ne
Win without using violent actions. Suu Kyi became the General Secretary of a new democratic party
called "National League of Democracy (NLD)." This position helped Suu Kyi speak up against U
Ne Win because of her political power. Being the daughter of someone who influenced Myanmar,
former Commander of the Burma (Myanmar) Independence Army, Aung San, she has gained much
popularity because of her father, but also because she was brave enough to speak up against Ne Win
to achieve democracy and human rights. Dictator U Ne Win resigned, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Also known as "The Lady" as she won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1991; also an outstanding example
of the power of the powerless. Suu Kyi spent her time between 1989–2010 in some sort of detention
because of her efforts to bring democracy to the military which ruled Myanmar. This made her an
international symbol of peaceful resistance in the face of cruelty. She didn't use violent actions to
accomplish her goals which is one of the reasons why she is a great example to many people. Suu
Kyi spoke out to help many people who don't have rights; and also to achieve democracy for
Myanmar, her hometown. Aung San Suu Kyi still today, is fighting for democracy and human rights
because she believes in human rights and will always help and fight for these things. Aung San Suu
Kyi, the woman known as "The Lady", known because she was brave enough to speak up against
dictator U Ne Win, and also the first woman to serve as Minister of Foreign Affairs of Myanmar, the
Minister of the President's Office, the Minister of Electric Power and Energy, and the Minister of
Education; Aung San Suu Kyi served as all of these which is one of the reasons why she is known

U.S. Military Regime And Its Policies

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Gloria Young

More from Gloria Young (16)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

U.S. Military Regime And Its Policies