Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Implementing Innovations: Validation, IP Contest, Diffusion and Evaluation
1. STAGE 3. STAGE III. CAN DO:
IMPLEMENTING INNOVATIONS
1. Validation of the Innovation Plan with the organization
2. IP Contest
3. Diffusion
4. Evaluation
2. What´s inside of a LR
STAGE 3. STAGE III. CAN DO: IMPLEMENTING INNOVATIONS
3. Validation of the IP & contest
ACTIVITIES DESCRIPTION GOALS TOOLS TIPS
•Engage those who
Validation of 1. Presentation of the 1. The innovation 1. Innovation plan
the Innovation Lessons Learned and plan is guide and will facilitate or stop
Plan with the innovation Plan validated by suggested you and make them
organization 2. Include adjustments the activities feel represented
•Use the learning
proposed organization
3. Make available expert 2. Reinforce materials of the LR
•Plan process not
ex post technical critical
assistance concepts and just one activiite
•Choose partners
tools
•Choose experts and
IP Contest 1. Voluntary the 1. Reinforce
participants present critical leaders as jury,
their adjusted concepts and make public the
proposal to contest tools criteria and IP files
2. Funding of the best 2. Contribute to a and results
•Prefer concrete and
plan, considering it´s live bank of
scalling up potential. innovations viable ideas either
than mega changing
strategies
STAGE 3. STAGE III. CAN DO: IMPLEMENTING INNOVATIONS
4. Diffusion and Evaluation
ACTIVITIES DESCRIPTION GOALS TOOLS TIPS
•Each profile need a
Diffusion 1. Organize all 1. Relevant agents 1. Online:
documents produced are informed www.procasur. different pack and
by the LR and able to use org/fida com chanel
•Partnership
2. Pack it in different knowledge 2. Offline in: E-
•Rich contact data
ways harvest by the books and
3. Distribute in an LR. printed base
strategic way publications
3. Videos
4. Feedback
report
•Evaluation is
Evaluation 1. Participatory 1. Recommendati 1. Survey for main
evaluation of process, ons and agents expensive, agree on
products, results and adjustments involved: basic dimensions
expected outcome 2. Outcome participants, and indicators, use
2. Documentation evidence hosts, team those already
2. Case studies available.
•Evaluate
after 9 or 12
months. application not
concepts.
STAGE 3. STAGE III. CAN DO: IMPLEMENTING INNOVATIONS
5. What do LR have that other not?
Critical Points Other Training LR
Methodology
Source of Knowledge High level of abstraction Practical
Target One knowledge for all Each profile need a specific
Everyone knowledge
The chosen one
Dissemination of Multiply Creatively adapt and adopt
Knowledge knowledge
Teachers Formally Certificate Experts LRT, practitioners, experts
(4 to 1)
Training Beneficiaries Passive, memorize Active, learn to research
solutions and innovate
Development Concentrated in an Hotel or Concentrated In the field
diluted in time
Evaluation Number of beneficiaries Application
Management of concepts
6. LR 2009 (an invitation…)
• Cultural Assets for the rural and local development
Colombia / May
• Development Banks: amplifying the access to financial services of the
rural poor
Brazil and Guatemala / June
• Green Markets
Colombia / June
• Access to Land
Ecuador and Bolivia/ Africa???/ Second semester
• Young Rural Talents
Latinamerica