SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
Translation Page 72
Chapter 7 Foundation loads
The foundation loads were calculated from a supporting frame work from the
following load cases and load case groups determining (from chapter 6.1.1)
Single load cases
In single load cases the part factor of safety are not included
Load case dead weight LF1
Without stations
Load case LF2 minimum dead load of the stations
Section it is calculated on G = 100 kg.
Load case LF3 maximum dead weight of the stations
Section it is calculated on G = 200 kg.
Load case traffic load LF4 (the same value like with possible snowy load)
The whole platform is loaded with p = 3.50 KN/m ².
Also the stairs are considered, in addition, with g = 3.50 KN/m.
Load case storm load LF5 in X directions
With the wind impact areas of the stations
Range from at z= 0 to 10m qeq(10) = 0.80 KN/m²
Range from at z= 10 to 20m qeq(20) = 1.00 KN/m²
Load case storm load LF6 in Y directions
As of LF 5
Translation Page 73
Load groups
In these loads the single load cases of the part factor of safety are already included.
All load groups (with the stability proof after theory 2nd order)
The operating wind is 30% of the storm load. (Factor 0.30 or 1.35×0.30 = 0.405)
Load group LG1
Installation with maximum numbers of visitors, heavy stations and X impact of wind
1.35×LF1 + 1.35×LF3 + 1.35×LF4 + 0.3×1.35×LF 5
Load group LG2
Installation almost empty, in operation with light stations and X impact of wind
1.35×LF1 + 1.35×LF2 + 0.3×1.35×LF 5
Load group LG3
Installation without operation with light stations and X impact of storm
1.35×LF1 + 1.35×LF2 + 1.35×LF 5
Load group LG4
Installation without operation with light stations and Y impact of storm
1.35×LF1 + 1.35×LF2 + 1.35×LF 6
Translation Page 74
Foundation loads of load group LG1
Knot No. Force [KN] res. Q
Foundation loads of load group LG2
Knot No. Force [KN] res. Q
Translation Page 75
Foundation loads of load group LG3
Knot No. Force [KN] res. Q
Foundation loads of load group LG4
Knot No. Force [KN] res. Q
Translation Page 76
Remark to the foundation loads
In this calculation 18 single foundations were considered. The horizontal loads are
also depending strongly on the stiffness of the structure. With connected foundations
only Σ H have to be are derived. The dimensions of foundation dependent on the
ground conditions and can be determined only on site. In this loads the part factor of
safety are already included. The supports of the outside poles were modeled so that
they only tractive forces up to the dead weight of the foundations are absorbed. The
dead weight of outside poles are considered with at least 20 KN. Then lift off loads of
more than 20 KN are absorbed up by the steel structure. The supports of poles were
calculated agilely, however, reserves are shown for the assembly loads with a low
rigidity of momentum.
Translation Page 77
Values indicating the absolute Maximum
max V = -600 KN min V = +20 KN (minus foundation weight)
max Q = 70 KN
Screw anchor
6 screw anchor of Hilti HSL-3, M16 Bore ∅ 24, bore depth 125mm
permitted shear force with 4 screw anchors and s >24cm
permitted V= 111 KN > given. Q = 70 /1.35 = 52 KN
Alternative screw anchor with similar capacity are possible

More Related Content

Similar to B.1 foundation loads

design-of-open-web-girder-bridge.pdf
design-of-open-web-girder-bridge.pdfdesign-of-open-web-girder-bridge.pdf
design-of-open-web-girder-bridge.pdfaslhal
 
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-rLec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-rCivil Zone
 
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-rLec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-rMUST,Mirpur AJK,Pakistan
 
Cee 312(2)
Cee 312(2)Cee 312(2)
Cee 312(2)apudgr8
 
Analysis and design of high rise rc building under seismic load
Analysis and design of high rise rc building under seismic loadAnalysis and design of high rise rc building under seismic load
Analysis and design of high rise rc building under seismic loadHtinKyawHloon1
 
Design of Various Types of Industrial Buildings and Their Comparison
Design of Various Types of Industrial Buildings and Their ComparisonDesign of Various Types of Industrial Buildings and Their Comparison
Design of Various Types of Industrial Buildings and Their ComparisonIRJESJOURNAL
 
"Characterization of hoisting operations on the dynamic response of the lifti...
"Characterization of hoisting operations on the dynamic response of the lifti..."Characterization of hoisting operations on the dynamic response of the lifti...
"Characterization of hoisting operations on the dynamic response of the lifti...TRUSS ITN
 
Structural Behaviors of Reinforced Concrete Dome with Shell System under Vari...
Structural Behaviors of Reinforced Concrete Dome with Shell System under Vari...Structural Behaviors of Reinforced Concrete Dome with Shell System under Vari...
Structural Behaviors of Reinforced Concrete Dome with Shell System under Vari...ijtsrd
 
CHAPTER 3 (part 1) Wind Load and procedure.pptx
CHAPTER 3 (part 1) Wind Load and procedure.pptxCHAPTER 3 (part 1) Wind Load and procedure.pptx
CHAPTER 3 (part 1) Wind Load and procedure.pptxMamushLeta
 
Chimney design &engg code
Chimney design &engg codeChimney design &engg code
Chimney design &engg codeVarun Nath
 
Lecture 6 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering Iaşi
Lecture 6 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering IaşiLecture 6 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering Iaşi
Lecture 6 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering IaşiUrsachi Răzvan
 
Explanatory Examples on Ductile Detailing of RC Buildings.pdf
Explanatory Examples on Ductile Detailing of RC Buildings.pdfExplanatory Examples on Ductile Detailing of RC Buildings.pdf
Explanatory Examples on Ductile Detailing of RC Buildings.pdfNagaManikantaTatikon
 
The International Journal of Engineering and Science (The IJES)
The International Journal of Engineering and Science (The IJES)The International Journal of Engineering and Science (The IJES)
The International Journal of Engineering and Science (The IJES)theijes
 

Similar to B.1 foundation loads (20)

design-of-open-web-girder-bridge.pdf
design-of-open-web-girder-bridge.pdfdesign-of-open-web-girder-bridge.pdf
design-of-open-web-girder-bridge.pdf
 
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-rLec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
 
Lec 13-14-15
Lec 13-14-15Lec 13-14-15
Lec 13-14-15
 
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-rLec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
 
Cee 312(2)
Cee 312(2)Cee 312(2)
Cee 312(2)
 
Analysis and design of high rise rc building under seismic load
Analysis and design of high rise rc building under seismic loadAnalysis and design of high rise rc building under seismic load
Analysis and design of high rise rc building under seismic load
 
seismic ubc -97
seismic ubc -97seismic ubc -97
seismic ubc -97
 
Design of Various Types of Industrial Buildings and Their Comparison
Design of Various Types of Industrial Buildings and Their ComparisonDesign of Various Types of Industrial Buildings and Their Comparison
Design of Various Types of Industrial Buildings and Their Comparison
 
"Characterization of hoisting operations on the dynamic response of the lifti...
"Characterization of hoisting operations on the dynamic response of the lifti..."Characterization of hoisting operations on the dynamic response of the lifti...
"Characterization of hoisting operations on the dynamic response of the lifti...
 
Structural Behaviors of Reinforced Concrete Dome with Shell System under Vari...
Structural Behaviors of Reinforced Concrete Dome with Shell System under Vari...Structural Behaviors of Reinforced Concrete Dome with Shell System under Vari...
Structural Behaviors of Reinforced Concrete Dome with Shell System under Vari...
 
CHAPTER 3 (part 1) Wind Load and procedure.pptx
CHAPTER 3 (part 1) Wind Load and procedure.pptxCHAPTER 3 (part 1) Wind Load and procedure.pptx
CHAPTER 3 (part 1) Wind Load and procedure.pptx
 
Chimney design &engg code
Chimney design &engg codeChimney design &engg code
Chimney design &engg code
 
Bridge
BridgeBridge
Bridge
 
Lecture 6 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering Iaşi
Lecture 6 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering IaşiLecture 6 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering Iaşi
Lecture 6 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering Iaşi
 
G.p presentation
G.p presentationG.p presentation
G.p presentation
 
Explanatory Examples on Ductile Detailing of RC Buildings.pdf
Explanatory Examples on Ductile Detailing of RC Buildings.pdfExplanatory Examples on Ductile Detailing of RC Buildings.pdf
Explanatory Examples on Ductile Detailing of RC Buildings.pdf
 
EQ06.pdf
EQ06.pdfEQ06.pdf
EQ06.pdf
 
Steel warehouse design report
Steel warehouse design reportSteel warehouse design report
Steel warehouse design report
 
Bridge loading
Bridge loadingBridge loading
Bridge loading
 
The International Journal of Engineering and Science (The IJES)
The International Journal of Engineering and Science (The IJES)The International Journal of Engineering and Science (The IJES)
The International Journal of Engineering and Science (The IJES)
 

More from esregroup

Chien lee meliopoulos
Chien lee meliopoulosChien lee meliopoulos
Chien lee meliopoulosesregroup
 
Cevre aydınlatma altyapı rev
Cevre aydınlatma altyapı revCevre aydınlatma altyapı rev
Cevre aydınlatma altyapı revesregroup
 
Brochure healthcare 2006
Brochure healthcare 2006Brochure healthcare 2006
Brochure healthcare 2006esregroup
 
Brochure general 2006
Brochure general 2006Brochure general 2006
Brochure general 2006esregroup
 
Biddle ground resistance testing - megger
Biddle   ground resistance testing - meggerBiddle   ground resistance testing - megger
Biddle ground resistance testing - meggeresregroup
 
B.2 foundation position
B.2 foundation positionB.2 foundation position
B.2 foundation positionesregroup
 
Ayd ses-renkli
Ayd ses-renkliAyd ses-renkli
Ayd ses-renkliesregroup
 
Aydinlatma direkleri temel temel detaylari
Aydinlatma direkleri temel  temel detaylariAydinlatma direkleri temel  temel detaylari
Aydinlatma direkleri temel temel detaylariesregroup
 
Antalya su kayaği 15-02-2008
Antalya su kayaği 15-02-2008Antalya su kayaği 15-02-2008
Antalya su kayaği 15-02-2008esregroup
 
Antalya su kayaği 04-02-2008-detay
Antalya su kayaği 04-02-2008-detayAntalya su kayaği 04-02-2008-detay
Antalya su kayaği 04-02-2008-detayesregroup
 
Antalya su kayaği 04-02-2008 özet
Antalya su kayaği 04-02-2008 özetAntalya su kayaği 04-02-2008 özet
Antalya su kayaği 04-02-2008 özetesregroup
 
Antalya su kayagi merkezi
Antalya su kayagi merkeziAntalya su kayagi merkezi
Antalya su kayagi merkeziesregroup
 
Acrobat document4
Acrobat document4Acrobat document4
Acrobat document4esregroup
 
Acrobat document3
Acrobat document3Acrobat document3
Acrobat document3esregroup
 
Acrobat document2
Acrobat document2Acrobat document2
Acrobat document2esregroup
 

More from esregroup (20)

Chien lee meliopoulos
Chien lee meliopoulosChien lee meliopoulos
Chien lee meliopoulos
 
Cevre aydınlatma altyapı rev
Cevre aydınlatma altyapı revCevre aydınlatma altyapı rev
Cevre aydınlatma altyapı rev
 
Brochure healthcare 2006
Brochure healthcare 2006Brochure healthcare 2006
Brochure healthcare 2006
 
Brochure general 2006
Brochure general 2006Brochure general 2006
Brochure general 2006
 
Biddle ground resistance testing - megger
Biddle   ground resistance testing - meggerBiddle   ground resistance testing - megger
Biddle ground resistance testing - megger
 
Betonanker
BetonankerBetonanker
Betonanker
 
B.2 foundation position
B.2 foundation positionB.2 foundation position
B.2 foundation position
 
Ayd ses-renkli
Ayd ses-renkliAyd ses-renkli
Ayd ses-renkli
 
Aydinlatma direkleri temel temel detaylari
Aydinlatma direkleri temel  temel detaylariAydinlatma direkleri temel  temel detaylari
Aydinlatma direkleri temel temel detaylari
 
Avrşmplogo
AvrşmplogoAvrşmplogo
Avrşmplogo
 
Art ice
Art iceArt ice
Art ice
 
Antalya su kayaği 15-02-2008
Antalya su kayaği 15-02-2008Antalya su kayaği 15-02-2008
Antalya su kayaği 15-02-2008
 
Antalya su kayaği 04-02-2008-detay
Antalya su kayaği 04-02-2008-detayAntalya su kayaği 04-02-2008-detay
Antalya su kayaği 04-02-2008-detay
 
Antalya su kayaği 04-02-2008 özet
Antalya su kayaği 04-02-2008 özetAntalya su kayaği 04-02-2008 özet
Antalya su kayaği 04-02-2008 özet
 
Antalya su kayagi merkezi
Antalya su kayagi merkeziAntalya su kayagi merkezi
Antalya su kayagi merkezi
 
Antalya a..
Antalya a..Antalya a..
Antalya a..
 
Ad1 90-10
Ad1 90-10Ad1 90-10
Ad1 90-10
 
Acrobat document4
Acrobat document4Acrobat document4
Acrobat document4
 
Acrobat document3
Acrobat document3Acrobat document3
Acrobat document3
 
Acrobat document2
Acrobat document2Acrobat document2
Acrobat document2
 

B.1 foundation loads

  • 1. Translation Page 72 Chapter 7 Foundation loads The foundation loads were calculated from a supporting frame work from the following load cases and load case groups determining (from chapter 6.1.1) Single load cases In single load cases the part factor of safety are not included Load case dead weight LF1 Without stations Load case LF2 minimum dead load of the stations Section it is calculated on G = 100 kg. Load case LF3 maximum dead weight of the stations Section it is calculated on G = 200 kg. Load case traffic load LF4 (the same value like with possible snowy load) The whole platform is loaded with p = 3.50 KN/m ². Also the stairs are considered, in addition, with g = 3.50 KN/m. Load case storm load LF5 in X directions With the wind impact areas of the stations Range from at z= 0 to 10m qeq(10) = 0.80 KN/m² Range from at z= 10 to 20m qeq(20) = 1.00 KN/m² Load case storm load LF6 in Y directions As of LF 5
  • 2. Translation Page 73 Load groups In these loads the single load cases of the part factor of safety are already included. All load groups (with the stability proof after theory 2nd order) The operating wind is 30% of the storm load. (Factor 0.30 or 1.35×0.30 = 0.405) Load group LG1 Installation with maximum numbers of visitors, heavy stations and X impact of wind 1.35×LF1 + 1.35×LF3 + 1.35×LF4 + 0.3×1.35×LF 5 Load group LG2 Installation almost empty, in operation with light stations and X impact of wind 1.35×LF1 + 1.35×LF2 + 0.3×1.35×LF 5 Load group LG3 Installation without operation with light stations and X impact of storm 1.35×LF1 + 1.35×LF2 + 1.35×LF 5 Load group LG4 Installation without operation with light stations and Y impact of storm 1.35×LF1 + 1.35×LF2 + 1.35×LF 6
  • 3. Translation Page 74 Foundation loads of load group LG1 Knot No. Force [KN] res. Q Foundation loads of load group LG2 Knot No. Force [KN] res. Q
  • 4. Translation Page 75 Foundation loads of load group LG3 Knot No. Force [KN] res. Q Foundation loads of load group LG4 Knot No. Force [KN] res. Q
  • 5. Translation Page 76 Remark to the foundation loads In this calculation 18 single foundations were considered. The horizontal loads are also depending strongly on the stiffness of the structure. With connected foundations only Σ H have to be are derived. The dimensions of foundation dependent on the ground conditions and can be determined only on site. In this loads the part factor of safety are already included. The supports of the outside poles were modeled so that they only tractive forces up to the dead weight of the foundations are absorbed. The dead weight of outside poles are considered with at least 20 KN. Then lift off loads of more than 20 KN are absorbed up by the steel structure. The supports of poles were calculated agilely, however, reserves are shown for the assembly loads with a low rigidity of momentum.
  • 6. Translation Page 77 Values indicating the absolute Maximum max V = -600 KN min V = +20 KN (minus foundation weight) max Q = 70 KN Screw anchor 6 screw anchor of Hilti HSL-3, M16 Bore ∅ 24, bore depth 125mm permitted shear force with 4 screw anchors and s >24cm permitted V= 111 KN > given. Q = 70 /1.35 = 52 KN Alternative screw anchor with similar capacity are possible