Military Leadership Essay

Military Leadership
Leadership occurs when people engage each other in a way that both, leaders and followers,
achieve the highest level of motivation and take an organization to new heights. A successful
leader always gets the job done the right way. In my opinion, building a relationship with
subordinates, leading from the front and adaptability are a few qualities essential for the success
of a leader. I believe that a good military leader builds a relationship with his followers who feel
motivated by it and work diligently to get the job done. This is achieved by the leader who makes a
conscious effort to gain thorough knowledge of his personnel background, habits, strengths and
weaknesses. A leader who develops an understanding about how his men react under various
conditions will employ them successfully. Personnel desire that their physical, mental and spiritual
needs are satisfied, it forms the basis of their...show more content...
In a military organization personnel emulate their leaders and the leader who leads from the front
influence his personnel by displaying professional competency and attracts their confidence and
respect. This brings forth a desire in his subordinates to match or even surpass the standards set by
him and generates a healthy competition within the unit. This makes a leader to be a part of the
group, understand the prevalent culture in the organization and, if necessary, transforms it to
enhance efficiency. The more difficult the situation, the greater will be the need for a leader to
inspire his men by displaying personal leadership qualities. A good leader will remain visible when
things are going wrong and invisible when they are going well. On the contrary, a leader who shies
away from setting a personal example of leading from the front does not enjoy the respect of his
subordinates that significantly reduces their
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Military Leadership Development
Abstract Leadership development in the military is critical to its mission and objectives.
Understanding and embracing leadership will foster an agile culture and facilitate attainment of
strategic goals. People desire quality leadership to assist with achieving their goals, albeit personal
or professional development. Having a clear vision and the motivation to perform at high–levels
influences others to work synergistically together to achieve organizational goals. Insomuch,
employees value being treated respectfully, fairly, and ethically. Leaders serve people best when they
help them develop their own initiative and good judgment, enable them to grow, and help them
become better contributors. Military Leadership Development For the next 10–15 years, leadership
development is critical within the military. Training to develop agile leaders will yield a competitive
advantage within both private and public organizations. Importantly, leadership training should
mirror as if one would fight in the new Era International Security Environment. Such tenacity will
confront limited engagements in the next 10 years, plus a great deal of offensive operations in the
15 years. Therefore, trained leaders are flexible to their changing missions, roles, and
responsibilities, thus are more adaptive to compelling new conflicts. Leadership Development
Program Many leaders rely on their technical skills, functional knowledge, and energy to achieve
results and have not mastered core

Military Leadership Philosophy Paper
Throughout my life and my military career I have experienced various leadership styles, from
civilian employers to military Officers and Non–Commissioned officers alike. Each had their own
approach to leadership, some I found to be effective and others I did not. I have attempted to
create a leadership philosophy based on a fusion of the leaders I have encountered and my own
personal experiences. Trust would be the first component of my leadership philosophy, if
subordinates do not trust you they will not follow you. This commodity is earned not given, as a
leader you must first prove that you are trustworthy before subordinates will follow. Second, you
should prove yourself to be knowledgeable in your field. Having a learned knowledge

Military Leadership Essay
1. I believe a true leader, leads from the front. A leader is the first in all, showing the way, setting
an example to all. A leader is trustworthy, loyal and approachable. A leader will support policy and
always do what is right. A leader is look up too and promotes motivation. A leader will take care
of his crew, from his most subordinate to his commander. A leader knows when to allow others
help. I would follow this leader and I wish to be this leader. 2. In the Army we are trained as
future leaders to lead from the front, set an example for others, and take care of your people. We
ensured our guys ate first, slept first, what ever it was, I allowed my guys first. We trained as a
team and put trust in each other because if have too, we would count on each other in battle. I
trusted my squad leaders and platoon sergeants, as I was trusted when I became a squad leader.
Lucky for me, I had great NCOs and officers who looked out for us. They we're good mentors and
pushed us...show more content...
This was my ship's clement. It felt like it was every non–rate for them selves, with petty officer,
chiefs and officers on a high horse. There was no motivation or spirit being instilled is us and I
knew this was wrong. Even thou it seem mostly negative, they where good shipmates who helped
train us and seem to care. My time on the ship was short but I used it as a learning moment for
myself. I knew then that if I was ever put into leadership position, that I would use what I learned
in the Army and my experience from the ship to create my personal leadership style. My
philosophy since then has been, 'take care of your people and the will take care of you'. I ensured
that no one was afraid of me and that I'm approachable. I ensured that I pulled more duty than those
in my duty section. Often I sacrifice my fun so that others can enjoy themselves. I have always been
a good listener, even when they are just whining because some times that all it takes to fix

Army Leader: Characteristics of LDRSHIP Essay
The Army's definition of leadership is "the process of influencing people by providing purpose,
direction and motivation while operating to accomplish the mission and improving the
organization." An army leader is anyone who inspires and influences people to accomplish their
goals. Leaders motivate people both inside and outside the army to help them pursue their goals,
focus thinking, and shape decisions for the better of the army. Leadership can be acquired by
anyone as long as they have the self–determination to do so. The main principles of leadership in the
army are broken down in to the acronym LDRSHIP (loyalty, duty, respect, selfless service, honor,
integrity, personal courage), characteristics the army aims to instilled in each...show more content...
Situational leadership theory is when a leader adapt's to the situation and the management styles
to the behavioral needs of the individual or group. Trait approach leadership gives more credence
to the qualities and traits that people are born with that make them natural born leaders. Officers
are taught to lead by example which means learning from the officers who came before them. As
a leader in the army, a solider is constantly watched and must uphold the army core values at all
times. Setting a good example for the young, non commissioned officers (NCOs) in the battalion
is vital to the battalions cohesion and morale. In order to lead by example an officer is taught
different leadership styles to incorporate in the field For instance, participating leadership style is
especially appropriate when there is time receive input, information, and recommendations of your
subordinates. The primary goal of the army is to develop the leaders of tomorrow. Leadership can
always be improved on throughout life. At the end of the day, a true leader "in the army will do
these three things live by the army core values, know the warrior ethos, and lead by example"–MSI
textbook. Leaders both in and out of the army are held to a higher standard holding themselves in a
professional manner at all times. The success of the group is attributed to the leadership styles and
core values instilled in the solider to do his job effectively. General Eisenhower once

From Combat to Cubicle: Examining Post–9/11 Combat Veterans Transitioning to Private Sector
Leadership Positions After becoming involved with several organizations serving the Post–9/11
Combat Veteran population, I have become increasingly aware of fellow veterans' desires to continue
to lead upon returning from the battlefield. After numerous deployments in support of multiple
campaigns, these men and women transition from the military with valuable leadership training and
experience that the private sector can benefit from. This skill set of leadership intangibles, including
strategic personnel management, adaptability, and problem solving, are simply too expensive and
time consuming for most tightly budgeted organizations to properly train...show more content...
There are three styles of leadership in particular that are applicable to the military leader;
Transactional, Transformational, and Servant. Transactional leaders in a military environment
pursue outcomes that are mutually rewarding by providing concise instructions and holding
subordinates accountable for their actions. This leadership style eliminates assumptions and allows
for subordinates to react rapidly and effectively, which is highly desirable in the chain of command
work structure implemented by all military organizations. Key characteristics of the transformational
leader are their ability to develop esprit–de–corps and to recognize the talents inherently in their
subordinates and to cultivate those talents to enable their organization to succeed. Servant
leadership is the converse of leadership in much of corporate America and the style I believe can be
most effective in aiding private sector organizations in maintaining high employee retention rates.
Servant leaders are selfless and seek to invest in the people they lead by genuinely caring about them
and their

Military Leadership Role
While enlisted in the military I was in charge of several firemen within my work center. I ensured
they arrived to work on time and completed daily tasks. Most people would consider this position
as a leadership role. However, I viewed it as more time management and personnel management. My
most influential role occurred once I exited the military. I worked as an assistant boxing coach for
at–risk youth. My specific job requirements were to teach basic boxing fundamentals and exercise
programming. Nonetheless, I took it upon myself to incorporate goal setting. Most of them would
set their goal to win a certain championship or to achieve a knockout in their next fight. Since our
control of the outcome is rather limited, I encouraged children

Military Leadership Styles And Philosophies
All organizations, whether governmental, corporate, or private, have structures with leadership
positions at various levels and different leadership philosophies. However, the military is an
organization that differs from the rest of them, because of the specific mission and complex
scenario. Therefore, military leadership styles and philosophies are very different from all other
kinds, and are far more special. There is no leadership position outside of the military that deals
with handling hard decisions and the motivation of people for activities that may require them
make the ultimate sacrifice for a greater good. Thus, to be a military leader means to have special
devotion and dedication for taking care of your followers, while...show more content...
Moreover, a true leader must not allow the unconscious transfer of their focus from the people to
themselves, by fixating on their career, ego, and personal success. A lack of emotional
intelligence may bring a toxic environment into the unit, which is not a trait of a good leader.
Furthermore, by focusing on themselves, a leader fails to accomplish a basic principle of a good
leadership, which is to care for the people, because they are the milestone of a true leader's success.
Taking care of the people by applying a high degree of emotional intelligence, which includes
self–awareness, self–regulation, motivation, empathy, and social skill, irrefutably distinguish a true,
successful, and effective leader from all others. A true, successful leader will incorporate emotional
intelligence in their leadership philosophy in order to create long–term strong and successful teams
that will be motivated to follow and complete the mission regardless of the circumstances. Applying
emotional intelligence in relationships within the organization, through the five domains, will
continue to further develop emotional intelligence awareness, thereby enhancing the capabilities to
create flexibility in their leadership style to be able to cope with any situation or event that may ask
for the whole team's commitment and sacrifice.

Military Leadership Research Paper
– Introduction
a.Definition of Military Leadership
b.Significance of the study of Military Leadership
c.Definition of Terms
– Body
a.History of leadership in the military
b.Different theories and styles of leadership
c.Leadership skills
d.Leadership of the future in the military.
– Conclusion
a.Concluding Statement

The leadership in our military is quite astonishing. Within this project, we will be looking at different
strategies that has helped ensure military leadership is top notch. Without great leadership, there
would be chaos and corruption in a company. Not only will we look at the United States and their
tactics on military leadership, but also some viewpoints worldwide. The highly disciplined military
leadership styles are a great reflection of true leadership and can be used in the civilian workplace.
This paper will reflect on how any company can exceed in their leadership capabilities by learning
from successful military leaders. With their expertise, we shall use their guidelines on obtaining an
outstanding leadership roles in businesses.
Keywords: Military Leadership
Military Leadership
According to the Encyclopedia the definition of military leadership is:
Within the U.S. military, leadership is generally considered something of a given. It is a fundamental
ingredient of warfare, without which the outcome of a combat operation cannot be assured. The
leader is the brain, the motive power of command, upon whom subordinates rely for guidance and
wisdom, and depend upon for good judgment. The leader must be determined, unflappable and
charismatic; confident in delegation of authority; able to combine the various strands of command
into a common thread; seasoned, intelligent, and thoughtful. (Oxford, 2000).
Let us first start with how military leadership is

Military Leadership
What does leadership really means to you? There have been many theories about leadership and its
styles, based among the relationships between human beings in which one or more persons exert a
degree of influence that can lead others to conquer a common goal. It doesn't matter what they say
about leadership what really matter is how you see yourself as a leader, what impact have you left in
your men, is it positive? Is it negative? What is your commander's opinion about you? Have you
thought about that before? Many questions to answer, don't they? As military leaders and guidance
for soldiers, we must demonstrate: endurance of character, competence, commitment, courage,
patriotism, honor, wisdom, justice, integrity, faith, charisma, high standards of communication,
discernment, generosity, initiative, listening, passion, positive attitude, high standards for
problem–decision making, responsibility, security, self–discipline, dedication to service, be open to
criticism and continuous improvement and many more. No matter...show more content...
Besides that, soldiers should spend most of the time training for war because every military
conflict requires more prepared soldiers and leaders to assume combat responsibilities. In my
judgment, combat leadership probably represents the greatest leadership challenge for any leader,
because we have to execute the mission while ensuring our soldier's welfare, morale and their
lives. To manage this risk and emerge victoriously is what makes a true leader because our
soldiers are our team, our family on the battlefield. it does not mean that we can only be combat
leaders. We must be able to lead our troops wherever we are, in any circumstance; we should
assume the leader's role at any

How To Be A Military Leader Essay
Leadership is defined as the ability to accomplish a set goal(s) due to the act of inspiring and
motivating a group of your peers. Former United States president Dwight D. Eisenhower made
famous a quote that stated, "Leadership consists of nothing but taking responsibility for everything
that goes wrong and giving your subordinates credit for everything that goes well."
(Notable–quotes.com). One of the most important aspects of the work area is leadership. Without
leadership, there will be no guidance to for teamwork and the percentage of successful goal will be
slim to none. Becoming a great leader is no easy feat however. An exceptional leader must lock in on
specific attributes such as intellect, moral character, and human...show more content...
The warning order must also follow the guidelines of the five paragraph OPORD format. A
warning issue may include what the mission consists of, coordinating instructions, deadline, and
who is all responsible for seeing this task is seen through. Which brings us to our final step of
leader's responsibilities: make a tentative plan. This is what really separates the boys from the
men. Up until now, it was merely receiving orders of what to do and who is a part of the plan.
Step 3 is all about the plan for mission essentials, analysis, specific and implied tasks, and a
restated mission report. The responsibility for this step is something not for the weak minded as
no situation is the same. Throughout history our country has had many leaders. Whether you're
the leader of a business, military platoon, or the leader of our great nation you were withheld with
the honor and trust to govern the actions and best interests of fellow Americans. But just because
you have achieved the title of a leader does not by default make you a good leader. A good leader
is a person who has risen above and beyond to show cooperation, perseverance, and respect to
decisions made by those still above you at one point in time. "As a seasoned member of the military,
you've risen through the ranks because you understood your mission and performed your duties with
distinction. At this stage of your career, your most important contribution may be how well you take
care of the service members and

Army Leadership Style Essay
Every leader in the U.S. Army have a different leadership style. During my thirteen years in the
Army I have seen several leaders placed in positions where it was obvious that they were born for
that position, performing admirably and making very real contributions. In other situations
leaders were placed in positions of leadership appearing unprepared for the role. These leaders
over time were soon surrounded by other leaders that ensured their success. Several leaders in my
career have left a lifelong mark on my leadership style. Every one of them left me with knowledge
that have built a foundation for my leadership beliefs and style. There is also what we call in the
Army, "toxic leadership" which produce harm to the organization, leaders

Military Leadership Philosophy
A concise, well thought out leadership philosophy will assist a leader in improving an organization.
My leadership philosophy statement is; if you develop a vision, believe in and support all the people
within your organization, then they will propel the organization to do amazing things. My
philosophy has evolved over time and was developed mainly from past experiences and enhanced
through formal education programs and personal reflection. Within the military organizations that I
have served, I've experience that most people want to do the right thing and make positive
contributions to an organization as long as the leaders within that organization provide a vision of
where they want the organization to go, show that they truly care about...show more content...
I believe that I would have made many of the same decisions with only a few changes if I were faced
with the same challenges. Both the commander and I have a tendency to emphasize people focused
behaviors which "include developing a positive climate, facilitating team member participation in the
group...and being friendly and supportive."1 We both agree that a vision is necessary for the
organization which was accomplished when the commander created the commanders tenants. My
leadership philosophy believes in and support all members of the organization. The commander
brought underutilized/marginalized members back into the organization and spoke with all ranks
within the organization to get their input on the health of the squadron for squadron improvements.
I was very impressed with the way the commander viewed the type of person he wanted in the
CEM; an individual with a differing viewpoint that can assist in making better decisions. One
decision that I would've made that differed from the commander were keeping a first–sergeant that I
did not have a good relationship with. As Lt Col Jeffry Smith states, the first–sergeant is the "most
important informal leader of your squadron."1 If I were to have a conflict with my first–sergeant,
which I could not resolve, and it brought

Military Leadership
into a common thread; seasoned, intelligent, and thoughtful.
When judging the qualities of leadership, there is a tendency to think of the gifted, or natural leader,
involving some expectation that leadership is an inherent personality quality that some have, and
...show more content...
Army Staff College, and the Naval War College. Historical examples ofmilitary success and failure
featured prominently in their curricula, on the assumption that trialвЂђandвЂђerror under combat
conditions was a poor method of inculcating leadership skills. Lessons learned in the classroom were
then effected in map and field exercises. The expectation was, and still is, that nonвЂђcombat
training would provide a fund of practical knowledge upon which a commander could use as a point
of departure under battlefield conditions.
For the educational reformers, emulation was key, although they admitted that talent was also
valuable. Raw talent, however, was no substitute for its disciplined application. Considering the
growing complexity and lethality of war, education was regarded as the surest means of directing
talent toward the desired end. Yet the question of native ability remained; could those without it
become effective leaders? A problem reformers grappled with was the difference between
leadership and command; they are not the same thing, for not all commanders are good leaders,
and not all leaders are good commanders. During the Civil War, Gen. George McClellan, for
example, was a truly inspirational leader who won the total devotion of his troops, yet consistently
failed to achieve decisive victory in battle. Gen. Ulysses S. Grant, on the other hand, was an
excellent commander, to whom few would

Military Leadership
A successful leader is the one who gets the job done the right way. True leadership occur when
people engage each other in a way that the leaders and followers achieve the highest level of
motivation and take an organization to new heights. In my opinion, building a relationship with
subordinates, leading from the front and adaptability are a few qualities essential for the success
of a leader. I believe that a good military leader builds a relationship with his followers who feel
motivated by it and work diligently to get the job done. This is achieved by a leader who make
conscientious efforts to gain thorough knowledge of his personnel background, habits, strengths and
weaknesses. A leader who develops an understanding about how his men react under various
conditions will employ them successfully. Personnel desire to satisfy their physical, mental and
spiritual needs form the basis of their...show more content...
In a military organization personnel emulate their leaders and the leader who leads from the front
influence his personnel by displaying professional competency and attracts their confidence and
respect. This brings forth a desire in his subordinates to match or even surpass the standards set by
him and generates a healthy competition within the unit. By doing so the leader becomes a part of
the group, understands the culture prevalent in the organization and if necessary transforms it to
further enhance efficiency. The more difficult the situation, greater will be the need for a leader to
inspire his men by displaying personal leadership qualities. A good leader will remain visible when
things are going wrong and invisible when they are going well. On the contrary, a leader who shies
away from setting a personal example of leading from the front does not enjoy the respect of his
subordinates that significantly reduces their

Army Leadership Levels
"Leadership is the process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction, and motivation to
accomplish the mission and improve the organization" (Mills, 2013). The Army measures its leaders
by their attributes and their core leader competencies. Also, a leader must be able to train, coach and
mentor their subordinates. Additionally, the Army has three levels of leadership: Direct,
Organizational, and Strategic. An effective leader understands and practices these qualities at an
operational level. Leader Attributes are measured by their character, presence, and intellect.
Character is defined by living the Army Values, Warrior Ethos, and discipline. Presence is a leader's
ability to demonstrate military and professional bearing, fitness,...show more content...
This is face to face leadership and influences the organization indirectly through their subordinates.
Direct level leaders monitor and coordinate team efforts, provide clear and concise mission intent,
and set expectations for performance. Direct level leadership influences can span from a few
people to a few dozen people. Organizational leadership happens on a broader spectrum. Leaders at
this level establish policies and effect the climate that supports their subordinate leaders. The addition
of subordinates can often make it difficult for them to see and judge immediate results. Their
planning and focus usually ranges from two to ten years. They must establish a long–term vision for
their organization and enable their subordinates to accomplish their mission while abiding by their
core leader competencies. Strategic level leadership is the highest level. They are responsible for
large organizations and prepare their commands and the Anny for future roles. Strategic leaders
apply all of their core leader competencies they acquire as direct and organizational leaders, and
adapt them to more complex realities of their strategic environment. They are responsible for new
systems acquisition, programs, research, and

Military Leadership
into a common thread; seasoned, intelligent, and thoughtful. When judging the qualities of
leadership, there is a tendency to think of the gifted, or natural leader, involving some expectation
that leadership is an inherent personality quality that some have, and...show more content...
Testing and promotion review replace the combat situation, while leadership itself becomes genuine
military doctrine. The guiding assumption of leadership doctrine is that incapable practitioners will
be winnowed out before their mediocrity costs lives in battle. Battle represents the severest test of a
commander's mastery of leadership doctrine, for the commander must stimulate subordinates to do
things that would imperil their health, even cost them their lives. It is here that the leadership role
diverges from the command role. Command merely vests the leader with authority to define and
order the accomplishment of an objective. Achieving it requires the additional influence of
leadership. Ideally, the leader sets the standard for command through personal example and shared
sacrifice. He must, therefore, demonstrate confidence in the troops and in his own abilities, while
acknowledging the risks his decisions may entail. If subordinates trust the leader's judgment and
abilities, and believe that he would not unnecessarily expose them to danger, his authority and
decisions will not be questioned. Under the stress of combat, however, a leader cannot assume
instant obedience. Fear and the instinct for selfвЂђpreservation are powerful disincentives to any
dangerous enterprise, and the commander cannot simply will them

Military Leadership Examples
The most dominant tenant of military leadership is to "lead by example." What people fail to
realize, however, is that everyone leads by example. Some people tend to lead by a good
example, and some people tend to lead by a bad example. I firmly believe that the first "leadership
example" you get as a cadet has the ability to shape your future experiences and contributions. Be it
one semester of having a great instructor, or three years of having a phenomenal tactical officer
(TAC), I would argue that the rate of return on cadet output with a positive experience is tenfold that
of a negative experience. My TAC of Company C–2, Major (Promotable) Nicole Ussery was that
positive experience for me at school. MAJ Ussery is a female Military

Military Leadership
Military leadership theory brings forth the discovery of many ideas regarding the application of
knowledge from a military background in a business environment. Much information was
premised on business owners, managers and employees working collectively, how to improve
communication skills, and how to define a goal and motivate others to follow it based on military
leadership. The connection between these two worlds of business and military is apparent. Many
of today's companies derive their structure and leadership model from that which is applied in the
army. The military typically has a main leader or a decision maker, who transmits orders to
subordinates at lower levels. This model is almost identical to what is seen in many...show more
content...
There are plenty of people who possess the personality traits associated with leadership, yet many
of these people never seek out positions of leadership (Wheeler, 2000). Behavioral Theory This
theory is based on the idea that a person is not born a leader, but that a person becomes a leader
through self–development and learning. It focuses not on mental qualities or internal states, but on
the actions and behaviors of leaders. According to this theory, people can learn to become leaders
through teaching and observation (Wheeler, 2000). One can conclude that it is the converse of the
Great Man theory. Contingency Theory According to this theory, there is not a leadership style that
would be best in all situations. Contingency theory of leadership focuses on particular variables
related to the environment that might determine which particular style of leadership is best suited
for the situation. If the leader is highly effective in one situation, he or she may not necessarily be
effective in another. Success depends upon a number of variables, including qualities of the
followers, the leadership style or aspects of the situation (Wheeler, 2000). Situational Theory This
theory states that situational factors, rather than skills of leader, determine the effectiveness of
leadership. Situational theories propose that leaders choose the best course of action based upon
situational variables. Different styles of leadership are needed

Military Leadership Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Paper Writing Service Reviews

More from Paper Writing Service Reviews (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Military Leadership Essay