Here are some of the key reasons why Cesar Chavez was an important figure:
- He fought for workers' rights and fair treatment of migrant farmworkers. As a farmworker himself, he witnessed firsthand the poor working conditions and exploitation that farmworkers faced. He dedicated his life to organizing and advocating for better wages, benefits, and protections for these workers.
- He led major nonviolent protests and strikes, such as the Delano grape strike and boycott. These efforts brought national attention to the struggles of farmworkers and helped pressure growers to recognize unions and agree to contracts establishing higher pay and grievance procedures.
- He was a pioneer of the use of nonviolent civil disobedience tactics
1. Cesar Chavez Essay
Cesar Chavez
Cesar Chavez was an American labor leader and leader of the civil rights movements. Chavez was
in search of justice for his people, especially Mexicans and Latinos. He stands up for these people
because he saw how their bosses were with those people. Their bosses were treating them like
slaves and not paying them the amount of money they should be getting. Chavez was a victim of
that and he saw that no one was making any changes and he took the chance and do justice.
Chavez was born on March 31, 1927, in Arizona. Chavez was dedicated to work in the field and to
help others. Chavez joined a company called the National Farm Workers Association and he started
working right away because the company needed people to start...show more content...
The company was aware of what Chavez was doing, but they didn't pay that much attention until they
started to lose money. Theboss of the company was started to get concerned and started sending
his people to stop the strikes. The strikes of Chavez were nonviolence so he didn't care if the
police or somebody came to stop it because it's against the law. However, the boss sends his
people over to Chavez and told him that if they don't stop the strike they will open fire to all the
people. The people of Chavez were getting scared, but Chavez was motivating them by saying "si
so Puede" until the police shot fire and took Chavez to jail. Cesar kept fighting until he got out of
jail and proceed his work he had left. Cesar was losing hope because people were not following
him because if they do they will get shot. Cesar stopped eating for a week to see if the people
were still caring to change the way they were getting threaten and the people got the message and
started doing strikes again without fear. The company was in rage, but they couldn't do anything
and the people were getting hopped. People from other countries were joining them too. People
were with Chavez and when the company had no choice but to surrender. Chavez at the end stood
up and started to eat again and he does justice for his people and for all the people around the world
saying the famous phrase, "Si se Puede".
In conclusion, Chavez is an important
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
2. Cesar Chavez Essay
One of the greatest civil rights activists of our time; one who believed the ways of Gandhi and
Martin Luther King that "violence can only hurt us and our cause" (Cesar Chavez); a quiet, devoted,
small catholic man who had nothing just like those he help fight for; "one of America's most
influential labor leaders of the late twentieth century" (Griswold del Castillo); and one "who became
the most important Mexican–American leader in the history of the United States" (Ender). Cesar
Chavez; an American farm worker, who would soon become the labor leader that led to numerous
improvements for union workers; it is recorded that Chavez was born near Yuma, Arizona on
March 31, 1927 and died on April 23, 1993 in San Luis, Arizona. (Wikipedia) His...show more
content...
Chavez joined his parents to help harvest carrots, cotton, and grapes under the blazing California
sun. During this period Cesar Chavez experienced the corrupt labor contractors, extremely low
wages, and poor living and working conditions that the migrant workers had to endure. Around this
time as well, he got his first glimpse of union organizing when his father became active in several
union activities. (Ramakrishnan; Russell) It is believed that Chavez's father and uncle actively
supported unions. Therefore he learned at a young age firsthand about strikes, organizing
operations, and also picket lines. (Gale Encyclopedia) During his lifetime, Cesar Chavez and his
followers made many changes and contributions to society. While he was alive, he had the privilege
to see what his non–violence actions produced; what they transpired. It is recorded that Chavez
began actively organizing workers in the fields in 1952. The California–based Community Service
Organization (CSO) recruited and trained for his work. Chavez built new chapters of CSO, led voter
registration drives, and helped Mexican–Americans confront issues of police and immigration abuse
during the next ten years. In 1958 he became general director of CSO. With $1,200 of his own
savings, Chavez resigned four years later, to found the National Farm Workers Association (NFWA)
in 1962. (Gale Encyclopedia) He was a very determined man; strived in everything he put his mind
to. Russell declares that by
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
3. Letter From Delano By Cesar Chavez Summary
How can an individual be persuaded to change his entire view of a group he detests? In "Letter
from Delano", by Cesar Chavez, the writer is attempting to perform this impossible feat on E.L.
Barr Jr., the president of the California Grape and Tree Fruit League. Throughout his life, 1927 to
1993, Chavez was a prominent civil rights activist who fought for the rights of farm workers. He
performed nonviolent protests including marches, boycotts, and hunger strikes. One famous boycott
was the Grape Strike, in which Cesar urged Americans to buy grapes from foreign places in order
to bring attention to the plight of field workers. By 1969, when the letter was written, Chavez had
already co–founded the National Farm Workers Association. His goal was to fight for better
treatment, increased pay, and improved working conditions. His nonviolent methods were extremely
similar to the protests of Martin Luther King Jr., who was assassinated in 1968, over the rights of
African Americans. In the letter, Cesar Chavez is specifically addressing claims, made by the
California Grape and Tree Fruit League, of a violent protest performed by the farm workers.
Throughout the letter, Chavez confronts the shocking accusations, explains his use of nonviolent
methods, and emphasizes the purpose of his protests. He strives to make the president understand the
plight of the workers and view their protests as a product of the worker's determination for change,
not as violent and personal attacks that
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
4. Cesar Chavez: An Effective Leader
Cesar Chavez was an effective leader for three main reasons: grassroots organizer and believer in
equal treatment, self–sacrifice, tough tactics. He was a believer in equal treatment and even got the
same pay and housing as those who worked for him. The picture shows that Cesar Chavez was not
going to give up not even how much self–sacrifice was required to prove his point. Last, in the data
It shows that Cesar Chavez used tough tactics to prove his point. As a result, Cesar Chavez was a
very great leader for copious amounts of reasons. To begin with, Cesar Chavez was a good leader
because he believed in equal treatment. According to "Ann McGregor's Remembering Cesar:
The Legacy of Cesar Chavez," He thought that everyone should have the same living conditions
no matter who they are or who they labor. "We found (a room) at the end of the corridor, that was
piled with broken furniture and empty beer cans," which shows how bad the conditions his
workers had to deal with. There was also equal treatment by pay, everyone got $7.50 a week for food
and $5.00 a week for other expenses (housing provided) (Cesar Chavez had this pay and...show more
content...
To begin with, he went on a hunger strike to prove his point and try to expand his organization. The
hunger strike consisted of 25 days that he and others refused to eat enough required to keep up their
body's needs. This strike got so much attention even Senator Robert F. Kennedy came down to
support Cesar and his organization throughout this hunger strike. Cesar worked throughout this
period of time to grow his movement which got the attention of many which decided to join the
cause to get justice without violence. Finally, it shows that Cesar was going to get his word out there
no matter how much self–sacrifice was required in distinction to Time–Life Pictures/Getty Images,
March 11,
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
5. Cesar Chavez Thesis
My partner and I were struggling to choose a topic,my partner Sondra Satele first picked was
Cesar Chavez but i felt like it was too simple we search for someone who was not as common we
found to like Oskar Schindler but we didn't feel like we would find enough resources on him. So
we looked deeper into Cesar Chavez's story as we researched more into the topic we soon came to
find that he had a huge impact on farmers. We liked him because he represented a group of
minorities that The way we conducted are research was from various sources. We got most of our
books from a field trip our school took to the University of Washington. This soon led us to many
endless nights of trying to better emphasize our thesis, until we realized the main purpose
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
6. How Cesar Chavez Saved My Life Summary
The article "Cesar Chavez Saved My Life," written by Daniel "Nane" Alejandrez reflects on Mr.
Alejandraz's past, covering some very unfortunate events, but with a purpose of pulling emotion
from the reader. While reading some parts of the article, I had to reread it over a few times to
comprehend the point that the author was trying to make. The most important thing about
knowing his past is that it is significantly different, and much more positive in the future because
of one person, Cesar Chavez. When Daniel Alejandrez was a young boy, he noticed his father
bowing his head to a superior and thought to himself that he would never do that. The reason
behind this was anger. Fast forward to around the age of seventeen, he and a few fellow coworkers
had noticed that they were being paid four times less than his older coworkers who were using
machines and not their bare hands. On the radio, a voice called "You must organize. You must seek
justice. You must ask for better wages." The voice was Cesar Chavez. With this quote in mind, he
and his coworkers went on strike against the contractor and they raised the wages from $1.65 to
$1.95. The point was not to raise wages, but to call attention to the unfair treatment that they were
enduring. The article then jumps to present day, in which he uses his past to relate to current
convicts and help them overcome the position that they are in, by allowing the prisoners to
understand their own culture and those of different cultures,
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
7. Cesar Chavez Hero's Journey
Cesar Chavez: A Hero's Journey "We draw our strength from the very despair in which we have
been forced to live. We shall endure"(Cesar Chavez). Growing up, Cesar Chavez worked in many
fields and labor camps, and he immigrated to many different states, but he was able to become
successful, despite his previous hardships. Chavez was born on March 31st 1927 in a small town
near Yuma, Arizona, but because his family was in search of work, they never stayed in the same
town very long. During the Great Depression, his family had lost their farm, so they had no choice
but to move to California to become a migrant farm worker. He hardly ever went to school because
of his work in the fields, but when he did go to school, he was discriminated...show more content...
This 5 year protest, lasting from 1965–1970, made them march 300 miles across California to
Sacramento, and they made sure it was all a non violent protest . Chavez was so passionate about
his protest, he went 25 days without food, and he only drank water. He chose to do this as an act
of penitence toward the farm workers. This risky tactic was a contributing factor to his death, 28
years later (ufw.org). His final stage of thehero's journey was the Return stage. Chavez had to
adjust to a new lifestyle because after he went 25 days without food, he lost 35 pounds, and he
was too weak to speak for the next 28 years. He mastered the 2 worlds when he won 3 awards for
his leadership in the public/community service. He won the Pacem in Terris award in 1992 for
public service with spanish cultures, he won the Jefferson award for public service. The
Jefferson award is the highest award a civilian can get, so he was very honored to receive this
award. Finally, he received the ... The hero's journey followed by odysseus can be compared to
the one traveled by Cesar Chavez. In the Odyssey, Odysseus was told by Helios not to eat the cattle
he was provided with. He did as told and started to starve. Although Chavez was not told to starve, he
chose to stay famished, due to the non–violent protesting. Both Odysseus and Chavez starved for the
purpose of their contrition toward the men they were leading. Another way you can compare
Odysseus to Chavez, is the way they lead their people.
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
8. Cesar Chavez Rhetorical Analysis
Cesar Chavez, a civil rights leader fighting for improving pay and working conditions of farmers,
employs the use of nonviolence resistance in his role as a leader of the United Farm Workers. As
a child, Chavez and his family worked as farmers on a field as migrant workers who were most
likely treated in an unjust manner and thus, he dedicated his life to improving the conditions for all
farmers. To honor Martin Luther King Jr. on the 10th anniversary of his death, Chavez wrote to a
religious magazine that helps people in need about the benefits of nonviolent resistance. Throughout
his letter, Chavez applies rhetorical devices such as pathos, diction, and juxtaposition to persuade
and inform people about how powerful and effective nonviolence techniques can be for civil rights.
Multiple times, throughout the text, Chavez uses pathos to appeal emotionally to his audience.
Chavez builds a connection and empathy with the readers and persuades them to be people who
fight for causes nonviolently. In the sixth paragraph Chaves states that, "men and women who are
truly concerned about people are non violent by nature. These people become violent when the deep
concern they have for people is frustrated and when they are faced with seemingly insurmountable
odds." Chavez states that everyone who actually cares about people should be nonviolent, that they
shouldn't have to resort to violence because they don't need it. This quote builds a connection and
causes self–reflection for the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
9. Cesar Chavez once explained the horrors of society when he said, "When the man who feeds the
world by toiling in the fields is himself deprived of the basic rights of feeding, sheltering and
caring for is family, the whole community of man is sick." (ufw.org) That means that the whole of
humanity is sick and cruel when the man who works the fields all day long to feed the all of the
citizens of the entire world can't even provide for himself. It was not a small amount of people it
affected, it was millions, and millions of citizens across the world. Chavez was a large factor in
beginning to abolish racism, or also called the Civil Rights Movement. Chavez's life started in a
small adobe home, near Yuma Arizona on March 31, 1927. His parents
...show more content...
He didn't like school as a child because he heard many wretched, racist comments; he also saw
signs that said, "Whites Only" One of the worst parts was that Spanish was verboten at his school.
If a student got caught violating that rule, they were hit on the knuckles with via a ruler. That
was was very unfortunate, considering that he only spoke Spanish at his house. In eighth grade
he left school to support his family by working in the fields. He did this on behalf of his father
getting in an accident, no longer able to work. At the age of 19 he enlisted into the Navy, near the
end of World War II. Chavez was in the Navy for two years even though he was glad to leave
California; on his account while living in California he said, " . . . wretched migrant camps,
corrupt labor contractors, meager wages for backbreaking work, bitter racism." (history.com) That
explains how rough life was in California. In 1948 he got married with a woman named Helen
Fabela. In their time together they had eight kids in the city of San Jose. In the time around 1950
they traveled together all around the country teaching migrant workers to read and to also write, so
they could officially become U.S.
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
10. Why Was Cesar Chavez Important
The fight is never about grapes or lettuce it is always about people. I believe that we need heroes
in our life because they can change our with their characteristics. Thats why i chose Cesar Chavez
because he is helpful, friendly and caring. Helpful, Cesar Chavez is helpful because he helped the
native farm workers with their jobs. He helped the native farm workers to get better payed and
have breaks in their jobs. Back then the native farm workers didn't get payed enough and they
wouldn't have breaks. Cesar Chavez also helped also helped many native farm workers a lot because
they used to work for many hours. Friendly, He is friendly because when he used to fight for civil
rights a lot of people and also native farm workers used to support
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
11. Essay about Cesar Chavez
Cesar Chavez Since before the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, race relations between the United
States and Mexico have been less than great. The United States has a history of prejudice and
racism. On a national level this sentiment has formed some legislation, and on a lower level it has
formed the way many people conduct their lives. Mexican have been exploited for their work for
decades. One man fought long and hard for his people and their civil liberties. That man was Cesar
Chavez. Cesar Chavez was born in Yuma, Arizona to a middle
–class family. Cesar's family owned
there land and also ran a business. When the depression hit in the1930's, the young Cesar Chavez
and his family left to find work in California as farm...show more content...
He found that the locals were upset because the braceros were taking their jobs. The bracero
program began in Congress in 1942. It's purpose was to import seasonal contract laborers in times
of labor shortages in the states. Apparently, the farmers would falsely claim labor shortages in
order to import braceros. The wages that farmers paid the braceros was a lot lower than that they
would have to pay the local workers. The farmers were also able to make their money back from
the braceros by charging them excess for room and board. Cesar combated against the farmers by
organizing boycotts, sit–downs and protests. All of Cesar's accomplishments got him the state
executive directorship for the CSO. He served this position for two years. In 1962, Chavez
proposed that the CSO support a union movement for farm workers. The movement was brought
to a vote a vote and rejected. During his time at the CSO, he had met Dolores Huerta, a woman
who shared his passion for obtaining farm worker's civil rights. His plan was to fight for the rights
of the migrant and resident farm workers in California. To achieve this goal, Chavez set out to form
a "viable union" among the thousands of disenfranchised farm workers. Chavez encountered many
obstacles after the formation of his union and at the beginning of their strike. Aside from the fact that
many of the workers were hesitant to join Chavez and go against
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
12. Ethos Pathos Logos In Cesar Chavez Speech
In the excerpt, Cesar Chavez, labor union organizers and civil rights leader, discusses how
nonviolent resistance to problems in society easily resolves a situation better than violent protest.
Throughout his speech, he uses many rhetorical strategies to argue his view on nonviolent
resistance. Chavez' use of ethos, logos, and pathos, creates his passionate attitude towards nonviolent
resistance. Chavez introduces the article with a use of ethos with his first reference to Dr. Martin
Luther King. While fighting for the rights of African Americans, King never turned to violent
protest, and Chavez admires that about him. By introducing King in the first paragraph, it creates a
sense of easier understanding to see his view. Chavez later references to Gandhi, who was a
non–violent icon in India fighting for civil rights. He says,...show more content...
When Chavez states an argument, he then addresses the reader's emotions to resolve any uplifting
self conflict. He states, "Nonviolence has exactly the opposite effect." Then in the next paragraph
he states, "But if we are committed to nonviolence only as a strategy or tactic, then if it fails the
only alternative is to turn to violence." He does this for the people that do not completely agree
with his point, to show that he acknowledges both sides, which strengthens his argument. He later
uses, "Examine history. Who gets killed in the case of violent revolution?" He does this to make
the reader remember the past of violent protest and how many people sacrificed their lives for a
cause, which makes the reader more passionate towards supporting his argument. Chavez achieves
his main purpose to persuade to support his view on nonviolent resistance. He does this by not only
using many examples, but to challenge the reader into thinking deeper into the lines of his speech.
By doing so, as well as using his many rhetorical strategies throughout, Chavez becomes very
effective in his
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
13. Cesar Chavez Essay
One of the greatest civil rights activists of our time; one who believed the ways of Gandhi and
Martin Luther King that "violence can only hurt us and our cause" (Cesar Chavez); a quiet, devoted,
small catholic man who had nothing just like those he help fight for; "one of America's most
influential labor leaders of the late twentieth century" (Griswold del Castillo); and one "who became
the most important Mexican–American leader in the history of the United States" (Ender). Cesar
Chavez; an American farm worker, who would soon become the labor leader that led to numerous
improvements for union workers; it is recorded that Chavez was born near Yuma, Arizona on
March 31, 1927 and died on April 23, 1993 in San Luis, Arizona. (Wikipedia) His...show more
content...
They then moved to California looking for work in the fields as temporary farm laborers; just like
thousands of other rural families in the southwest. The family led a nomadic life; moving very
often in search of migrant work. Chavez joined his parents to help harvest carrots, cotton, and
grapes under the blazing California sun. During this period Cesar Chavez experienced the corrupt
labor contractors, extremely low wages, and poor living and working conditions that the migrant
workers had to endure. Around this time as well, he got his first glimpse of union organizing when
his father became active in several union activities. (Ramakrishnan; Russell) It is believed that
Chavez's father and uncle actively supported unions. Therefore he learned at a young age firsthand
about strikes, organizing operations, and also picket lines. (Gale Encyclopedia) During his lifetime,
Cesar Chavez and his followers made many changes and contributions to society. While he was
alive, he had the privilege to see what his non–violence actions produced; what they transpired. It is
recorded that Chavez began actively organizing workers in the fields in 1952. The California–based
Community Service Organization (CSO) recruited and trained for his work. Chavez built new
chapters of CSO, led voter registration drives, and helped Mexican–Americans confront issues of
police and immigration abuse during the next ten years. In 1958 he became general director of CSO.
With
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
14. Cesar Chavez Research Paper
Cesar Chavez is a well known, important, labor leader, civil rights activist and founder of the
National Farm Workers Association. Cesar Chavez was born on March 31, 1927 in Yuma
Arizona. At a young age Chavez learned about the injustices and maltreatment of Mexicans at the
hands of Anglo citizens. At the age of 10 Chavez and his family lost their home and store in 1937
forcing them to travel to California to become farm workers. At the time farm workers had to
travel from farm to farm for whatever harvest was in season. Cesar Chavez only received an 8th
grade education and went on to attended 38 different schools until he dropped out to become a farm
worker. In his earliest form of social activism Chavez joined the Community Service Organization,
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
15. Rhetorical Analysis Of Cesar Chavez Speech
Rhetorical Analysis: Cesar Chavez speech to the Commonwealth Club (1984) On November 9,
1984 in San Francisco, California, Cesar Chavez gave his speech to the Commonwealth Club of
California. This club is not a profit educational organization based in Northern California and it's
the oldest and largest public affairs forum that puts together events about politics, culture, society,
and the economy. Cesar Chavez was a labor leader and civil rights activist who was known to help
others, especially farm workers. He spoke out against the inequality these people endured to labor
and living conditions. Chavez's speech is rhetorically effective because he uses repetition, ethos,
pathos, and logos. First, Chavez uses ethos to persuade his audience
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
16. Cesar Chavez Elegy
Great people are what make this world a better place just like these people I am going to write
about."Elegy on the death of Cesar Chavez" by Rudolfo Anaya is an elegy that is about when
Cesar's death and what the people did after his death. Another story is an informational text called
"Flesh and blood so cheap" by Albert Marrin is about a fire that took many people's lives and
what they did during the fire. Both of these people made a big impact however I think Cesar
Chavez made the bigger impact because he didn't just bring attention to the problem he did
something to fix I think the people in the triangle fire made a lesser difference in the world because
they didn't do as much a Cesar Chavez did but the world wouldn't be the same without them. One
reason I think they did a good thing for the world is,"Onlookers saw many dreadful sights, none so
more than the end of a love affair."[Marrin,13] This shows that the people watching might of said
something to fix the problem. Another quote is,"Those who reached the ninth–floor stairway door
found it locked."[Marrin,7] This shows that if this book was published back then someone would
complain to give workers better rights. To conclude this paragraph i think these people did a good
thing for society....show more content...
I think Cesar Chavez made a bigger difference in this world because of this quote, "Kill the day and
stop all time, stop la muerte Who has robbed us of our morning sun that Luminus light that greeted
workers as they Gathered around the dawn campfires Let the morning light of Quetzalcoatl and
christian saint Shine again." [Anaya,14–19] In this quote it shows that people would want to bring
back Cesar Chavez to help farm workers with their lives. Another quote is, "This man who moved
like the light of justice die." [Anaya,24]. In the quote it shows that the people thought that he was
full of
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
17. Cesar Chavez Essay
Throughout time there have been many people who have wanted to enact change or make a
difference. Cesar Chavez helped migrant farmers with their unsafe work conditions and their lack
workers rights. Mother Jones marched for children's rights and to create child labor laws. Van
Jones is fighting for human rights currently. These people all did amazing things and all fought for
a singular purpose.Cesar Chavez, Mother Jones, and Van Jones all helped fight to enact change, by
making people notice their cause and by having the perseverance to keep fighting for others to have
better lives. Cesar Chavez fought for other migrant farmers because he had experienced what they
were experiencing and thought he should make a difference when Chavez...show more content...
This shows Mother Jones immense kindness by helping children without cause, just because she
loved children. Mother Jones loved children and when she went to see the mill children she saw that
"Their bodies were bone–thin, with hollow chests. Their shoulders were rounded from long hours
spent hunched over the workbenches"(Josephson). This shows the horrible conditions the mill
children had to endure before Mother Jones's March of the Mill Children. After the march had failed
due to the president being unwilling to the mill children Josephson noted: "Though she had not met
with the president, Mother Jones had drawn the attention of the nation to the problem of child
labor"(Josephson). This proves that even though Mother Jones march was not successful it had
grabbed the attention of the public and made the public realize the problems the mill children were
facing. Mother Jones was able to get the attention of the public by marching with the mill children to
the president, although they were not able to meet with the president her efforts were not in vain and
it started the long journey to child labor laws just because of her kind nature. Van Jones is still
currently fighting for human rights, Van Jones has taken a different approach than most and has
founded many enterprises to get
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
18. Cesar Chavez And Civil Disobedience
Being disobedience is a trait that can be used for the right or wrong reasons. It forms an obstacle
reflection on how we are supposed to use or react in the situational concept. A negative word can
be used for the ones that are capable to rise in a resembling way. For instance, Cesar Chavez, a
labor leader and participated during the civil rights. He dedicated his entire life to improve the
treatment and pay for farm workers. Similarity, was Rosa Parks, the women that was called, "the
mother of the freedom movement." She jeopardized herself and broke many rules in order to stand
up and get a better life habit. These two people that I provided are examples of risk takers that are
also as well disobedient, but are doing it for a good reason.
In 1927, Cesar Chavez dedicated his life to get improving treatment, pay and working conditions for
the farm workers. He put others as a priority before himself and his needs. The people that were
against him thought of him as...show more content...
The African Americans were forced to sit in the back while the white could sit anywhere, even take
their seat away if their isn't any left. One day, a African American named Rosa Parks refused to sit
in the back of the bus and was sent to jail for her acts of civil disobedience. The reason she was
sent to jail was for her act of breaking the rules, but her acting disobedience lead to boycotts and
launched to the freedom and justice for African Americans. The reason for Rosa Parks stood up
for herself and others. She helped others receive the same treatment as the whites do. Even
though she risked herself by breaking rules and she was sent to jail. The people who were against
her thought she broke a rule and she labeled her a disobedience, but instead she broke the line
between the African Americans and whites. Rosa Parks was served as a symbol of what is possible
to stand up, even if she was the only one
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
19. Cesar Chavez Research Paper
Cesar Chavez a freedom fight for field workers. Cesar fought for the workers by creating the
national farm workers association for not only the workers but for everyone right that has a bad
working condition and bad payment. Cesar Chavez was born on March 31,1927 in Yuma,
Arizona. CesarЕ› parents were Juana Estrada and Librodo Chavez. In his early life, Cesar worked
as a young boy on his family farm by feeding the farm animals, collecting the eggs from the hen
house, and by doing all the chores around the house. While his siblings went to school, Cesar did all
the chores because he was the youngest and didn't go to school until he was six years old. He started
school in Arizona, he thought that his teachers would...show more content...
When the workers marched to the farm owners' houses to protest, the farmers would throw gas
bombs at the workers. Finally, the farmers started to realize that Cesar was right and they began to
give the workers the right conditions they need and the amount of money they deserved. In 1966,
the image of La Virgin de Guadalupe, he led farmworkers on a 250–mile pilgrimage to the capital of
California. Cesar and workers and farmers walked from Delano to Sacramento, California to
demonstrate how serious they were.The farm owners finally gave in and gave the workers good
housing and good working conditions. Cesar is famous for doing his best for the farm workers
and helping them to have the conditions and the rights they deserved. He wouldn't let the workers
use violence against the farmers, and did a long fast instead to raise awareness of the problems. In
1968 he embarked on a spiritual fast for 25 days to affirm his personal commitment and that of the
farm labor movement to non–violence. He fasted again for 25 days in 1972, and in 1988, at the age
of 61, he endured a 36–day "Fast for Life" to pesticides on farmworkers and their children. This has
made him an American
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
20. When caught in an injustice, protesters tend to use various strategies in attempt to successfully
convey their opinions. In an article published by Cesar Chavez, he describes his fight for civil rights
by using Martin Luther King Junior's methods to show how violence fails to promote victory.
Chavez appeals to his audience by using ethos, pathos, and allusion to highlight how nonviolence is
more of an effective form of protesting.
Cesar Chavez uses ethos by using similar characteristics as Dr. King to gain the attention of his
intended audience. For instance, "Dr. Kings entire life was an example of power that non violence
brings to bear in the real world" which shows Chavez talking about King's achievements (1–2).
Chavez gains...show more content...
In another case, "however important the struggle is and however much misery, poverty and
exploitation exists, we know that it cannot be more important than a human life" which also shows
Chavez' familiarity to the emotions of his audience frequently experience (37–39). He brings up a
moral factor as people are starting to consider harmful tactics. He is well aware of how hatred can
lead to harmful effects, and he reminds his audience that it would be immoral to potentially take the
life of a human being just because they are frustrated with the injustice system. Chavez is only
trying to ease his audience because he is familiar that there is a widespread feeling of impatience
and anger.
In Cesar Chavez's article, he alludes Gandhi and God to remind his people why they must
continue to fight with nonviolence. When Chavez states "Our conviction is that human life is a
very special possession by God to man" shows Chavez using God to express how all our lives are
precious and resulting in violence could do more bad than good (9–10). He does not want us to
stoop down to their level and by acting with violence we will be doing exactly that. Chavez also
alludes to Gandhi when he states," The boycott, as Gandhi taught, is the most nearly perfect
instrument of nonviolent change, allowing makes of people to participate actively in a case" which
displays that Chavez is trying to remind them that harmless methods are more effective. If you were
Get more content on HelpWriting.net